Chest x-ray vs. computed tomography of the chest in pediatric blunt trauma

Clinical Predictors of Major Intrathoracic Injury in Pediatric Blunt Trauma

OBJECTIVES

Blunt trauma in pediatric patients accounts for a significant proportion of pediatric death from traumatic injury. Currently, there are no clinical decision-making tools available to guide imaging choice in the evaluation of pediatric patients with blunt thoracic trauma (BTT). This study aimed to analyze the rates of missed major intrathoracic injuries on chest x-ray (CXR) and identify clinical risk factors associated with major intrathoracic injuries to formulate a clinical decision-making tool for computed tomography (CT) use in pediatric patients with BTT.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective single-center study using an institutional trauma database of pediatric patients. Inclusion criteria included age, blunt trauma, and patients who received a CXR and thoracic CT within 24 hours of presentation. Thoracic CT findings were graded as major, minor, or none, and comparison CXR was used to determine the rate of missed thoracic injuries. Eighty-four patient variables were then collected, and clinically relevant variables associated with major intrathoracic injuries were placed in a logistic regression model to determine the best predictors of major injury in pediatric BTT patients.

RESULTS

A total of 180 patients (48.3%) had CXR that missed an injury that was seen on thoracic CT. In our cohort, 20 patients (5.4%) had major injuries that were missed on CXR. Characteristics correlating with major thoracic injuries were older age (odds ratio [OR], 1.125; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.015-1.247), chest pain (OR, 4.907; 95% CI, 2.173-11.083), abnormal chest auscultation (OR, 3.564; 95% CI, 1.406-9.035), and tachycardia (OR, 2.876; 95% CI, 1.256-6.586). Using these 4 variables, receiver operating characteristic analysis revealed an area under the curve of 0.7903.

CONCLUSIONS

Pediatric BTT patients older than 15 years with tachycardia, chest pain, or abnormal chest auscultation are at increased risk for major intrathoracic injuries and may benefit from thoracic CT.

A systematic review and meta-analysis of incidental findings in computed tomography scans for pediatric trauma patients

PURPOSE

To quantitatively synthesize and report the frequency and category of incidental findings on Computed Tomography (CT) scans in pediatric trauma patients.

METHODS

A thorough literature search was carried out in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases until March 6, 2023, in adherence to the preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Studies describing incidental findings on CT scans in trauma patients ≤21 years were included. Incidental findings were grouped into three categories: Category 1 (requiring immediate or urgent evaluation or treatment), Category 2 (likely benign but which may require outpatient follow-up), and Category 3 (benign anatomic variants or pathologic findings that do not require follow-up or intervention).

RESULTS

Seven studies were included in this study, which revealed a combined rate of 27.10 % of incidental findings with notable heterogeneity among the studies. Aggregated frequencies were 10.15 % for Category 1, 32.18 % for Category 2 and 51.44 % for Category 3. Subgroup meta-analysis on abdominal CT scans showed a higher pooled incidence of incidental findings at 47.17 %, but with lower heterogeneity than the general meta-analysis.

CONCLUSION

The study underscores the prevalence of incidental findings in pediatric trauma patients undergoing CT scans. The categorization of these findings provides useful information for clinicians in determining appropriate follow-up and management strategies.

Have the UK Pediatric Trauma Protocols resulted in a reduction in chest computed tomography imaging for children presenting with major blunt trauma?

Objectives

To observe variation in imaging requests after publication of the Royal College of Radiologists UK Paediatric Trauma Protocols in 2014, recommending limited use of thoracic computed tomography (CT) to appropriately clinically risk stratified children.

Method

A retrospective observational study using data from the Trauma Audit & Research Network in the United Kingdom, for children (0-16 years of age) for the years 2012-2021. Percentages were calculated to facilitate comparison between year groups (under 1 year of age, 1-10 years of age, 11-15 years of age), and CT imaging categories reviewed: (1) whole-body CT (WBCT); (2) abdominopelvic CT (CTAP) with chest radiograph (CXR); (3) chest, abdomen, and pelvic CT (CTCAP) with CXR; (4) CTCAP without CXR; and (5) other imaging.

Results

Increased use of the recommended protocol (CXR with CTAP) was observed after guidance publication but was not sustained: infants under 1 year old, 0.0% in 2012, 7% in 2017, 0.0% in 2021; 1-10-year-olds, 4% in 2012, 13.9% in 2017, 5.5% in 2021; 11-15-year-olds, 7.1% in 2012, 10.2% in 2017, 6.6% in 2021. Requests for WBCT increased from 2012-2021 (all age groups, 2.4%, 2012, to 5.3%, 2021) and requests for CTCAP were consistently at a higher level than that of the recommended protocol.

Conclusion

The increased use of CXR with CTAP after publication of the guidelines, was not sustained with a decreasing trend observed from ∼2017, raising concern for the ionizing radiation burden in this population.

Application of a Thoracic CT Decision Rule in the Evaluation of Injured Children: A Quality Improvement Initiative

BACKGROUND

Differences in injury patterns in children suggest that life-threatening chest injuries are rare. Radiation exposure from computed tomography increases cancer risk in children. Two large retrospective pediatric studies have demonstrated that thoracic computed tomography can be reserved for patients based on mechanism of injury and abnormal findings on chest radiography.

OBJECTIVE

Implement a decision rule to guide utilization of thoracic computed tomography in the evaluation of pediatric blunt trauma, limiting risk of unnecessary radiation exposure and clinically significant missed injuries.

METHODS

A protocol for thoracic computed tomography utilization in pediatric blunt trauma was implemented using a Plan-Do-Study-Act cycle at our Level I pediatric trauma center, reserving thoracic computed tomography for patients with (1) mediastinal widening on chest radiography or (2) vehicle-related mechanism and abnormal chest radiography. We modified our resuscitation order set to limit default imaging bundles. The medical record and trauma registry data were reviewed for all pediatric blunt trauma patients (younger than 18 years) over a 30-month study period before and after protocol implementation (May 2017 to July 2018 and February 2019 to April 2020), allowing for a 6-month implementation period (August 2018 to January 2019).

RESULTS

During the study period, 1,056 blunt trauma patients were evaluated with a median (range) Injury Severity Score of 5 (0-58). There were no significant demographic differences between patients before and after protocol implementation. Thoracic computed tomography utilization significantly decreased after implementation of the protocol (26.4% [129/488] to 12.7% [72/568; p < .05]), with no increase in clinically significant missed injuries. Protocol compliance was 88%.

CONCLUSIONS

Application of decision rules can safely limit ionizing radiation in injured children. Further limitations to thoracic computed tomography utilization may be safe and warrant continued study due to the rarity of significant injuries.

Pediatric scapular fractures and associated injuries following blunt chest trauma

BACKGROUND

Scapular fractures in the pediatric population are rare, and medical literature is lacking regarding these specific injuries in the pediatric population. Prior studies have shown that scapular fractures resulting from blunt chest trauma have been associated with significant morbidities in adults, and that a majority of scapular fractures are missed on chest X-ray (CXR) and seen on computerized tomography only (SOCTO). Further guidance is needed regarding the prevalence of coinciding injuries in the pediatric population and the modality for diagnosis.

OBJECTIVES

The primary objectives of this study were to assess 1) the frequency of scapular fractures following blunt trauma in the pediatric cohort, 2) the frequency of other associated thoracic injuries, 3) the proportion on scapular fractures SOCTO.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study with data obtained from our study site's Trauma Registry. Patients under 18 years receiving both a CXR and chest CT following blunt trauma or any patient diagnosed with a scapular fracture by any modality from January 2009 to December 2019 were included. Primary outcome variables were the presence of a scapular fracture diagnosed by any modality, absence of scapular fracture, and scapular fractures SOCTO. Charts were also reviewed for the following concurring injuries: 1) contusion/atelectasis, 2) pneumothorax, 3) hemothorax, 4) rib fracture, 5) other fracture, 6) vascular injury, 7) mediastinal injury, 8) diaphragm rupture, 9) foreign body, 10) incidental finding.

RESULTS

Of 12,826 charts of pediatric patients with blunt chest trauma, 1405 obtained both CXR and chest CT. Sixty (0.47%) were diagnosed with scapular fracture, and 48 (73.3%) of the fractures were SOCTO. The most commonly associated injuries were other fracture (88.3%), lung contusion/atelectasis (78.3%), pneumothorax (58.3%) and rib fracture (58.3%). Patients with scapular fractures had higher injury severity scores (ISS) and more frequently required surgery for other intrathoracic injuries. Only five patients required surgical management of the scapular fracture with the rest managed conservatively.

CONCLUSION

Pediatric scapular fractures are rare and are often associated with other intrathoracic injury. A majority of scapula fractures are missed on CXR, but identification of the injury did not change management as most were treated conservatively.

Selective Computed Tomography (CT) Imaging is Superior to Liberal CT Imaging in the Hemodynamically Normal Pediatric Blunt Trauma Patient

BACKGROUND

The optimal imaging strategy in hemodynamically stable pediatric blunt trauma remains to be defined. The purpose of this study was to determine the differences between selective and liberal computed tomography (CT) strategy in a pediatric trauma population with respect to radiation exposure and outcomes.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of hemodynamically stable blunt pediatric trauma patients (≤16 y) who were admitted to a Level I trauma center between 2013-2016. Patients were stratified into selective and liberal imaging cohorts. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were used to compare outcomes between the groups. Outcomes included radiation dose, hospital and ICU length of stay, complications and mortality.

RESULTS

Of the 485 patients included, 176 underwent liberal and 309 selective CT imaging. The liberal cohort were more likely to be severely injured (ISS>15: 34.1 versus 8.4%, P< 0.001). The odds of exposure to a radiation dose of >15 mSv were higher with liberal scanning in patients with both ISS > 15 (OR 2.78, 95% CI 1.76-5.19, P< 0.001) and ISS ≤ 15 (OR 3.41, 95% CI 2.19-8.44, P < 0.001). Adjusted outcomes regarding mortality, ICU length of stay, and complications were similar between the cohorts.

CONCLUSION

Selective CT imaging in hemodynamically stable blunt pediatric trauma patients was associated with reduced radiation exposure and similar outcomes when compared to a liberal CT strategy.