Identifying risk factors for enteral access procedures in neonates with congenital diaphragmatic hernia: A novel risk-assessment score

Surgical approaches to congenital diaphragmatic hernia

Surgical repair of the diaphragm is essential for survival in congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH). There are many considerations surrounding the operation - why the operation matters, optimal timing of repair and its relation to extracorporeal life support (ECLS) use, minimally invasive versus open approaches, and strategies for reconstruction. Surgery is both affected by, and affects, the physiology of these infants and is an important factor in determining long-term outcomes. Here we discuss the evidence and provide insight surrounding this complex decision making, technical pearls, and outcomes in repair of CDH.

Long-term follow-up in congenital diaphragmatic hernia

With improvements in initial care for patients with congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH), the number of CDH patients with severe disease who are surviving to discharge has increased. This growing population of patients faces a unique set of long-term challenges, multisystem adverse outcomes, and post-intervention complications requiring specialized multidisciplinary follow-up. Early identification and intervention are essential to mitigate the potential morbidity associated with these challenges. This manuscript outlines a general framework for long-term follow-up for the CDH patient, including cardiopulmonary, gastrointestinal, neurodevelopmental, surgical, and quality of life outcomes.

Approaches to nutrition and feeding in congenital diaphragmatic hernia

In patients with congenital diaphragmatic hernia1, nutrition can represent a challenge both in the short and long term. Its failure to resolve can have a significant impact on multiple aspects of the lives of patients with congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH), ranging from lung function to neurodevelopment. In this review, we will describe the causes of nutritional problems in patients with CDH, their consequences, and possible strategies to address them.

A clinical consensus guideline for nutrition in infants with congenital diaphragmatic hernia from birth through discharge

OBJECTIVE

To develop a consensus guideline to meet nutritional challenges faced by infants with congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH).

STUDY DESIGN

The CDH Focus Group utilized a modified Delphi method to develop these clinical consensus guidelines (CCG). Topic leaders drafted recommendations after literature review and group discussion. Each recommendation was sent to focus group members via a REDCap survey tool, and members scored on a Likert scale of 0-100. A score of > 85 with no more than 25% outliers was designated a priori as demonstrating consensus among the group.

RESULTS

In the first survey 24/25 recommendations received a median score > 90 and after discussion and second round of surveys all 25 recommendations received a median score of 100.

CONCLUSIONS

We present a consensus evidence-based framework for managing parenteral and enteral nutrition, somatic growth, gastroesophageal reflux disease, chylothorax, and long-term follow-up of infants with CDH.

Surgical Risk Factors for Delayed Oral Feeding Autonomy in Patients with Left-Sided Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia

BACKGROUND

Congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) is a rare disease associated with major nutritional and digestive morbidities. Oral feeding autonomy remains a major issue for the care and management of these patients. The aim of this study was to specify the perinatal risk factors of delayed oral feeding autonomy in patients treated for CDH.

METHODS

This monocentric cohort study included 138 patients with CDH. Eighty-four patients were analyzed after the exclusion of 54 patients (11 with delayed postnatal diagnosis, 5 with chromosomal anomaly, 9 with genetic syndrom, 13 with right-sided CDH, and 16 who died before discharge and before oral feeding autonomy was acquired). They were divided into two groups: oral feeding autonomy at initial hospital discharge (group 1, n = 51) and nutritional support at discharge (group 2, n = 33). Antenatal, postnatal, and perisurgical data were analyzed from birth until first hospital discharge. To remove biased or redundant factors related to CDH severity, statistical analysis was adjusted according to the need for a patch repair.

RESULTS

After analysis and adjustment, delayed oral feeding autonomy was not related to observed/expected lung-to-head ratio (LHR o/e), intrathoracic liver and/or stomach position, or operative duration. After adjustment, prophylactic gastrostomy (OR adjusted: 16.3, IC 95%: 3.6-74.4) and surgical reoperation (OR adjusted: 5.1, IC 95% 1.1-23.7) remained significantly associated with delayed oral feeding autonomy.

CONCLUSIONS

Delayed oral feeding autonomy occurred in more than one third of patients with CDH. Both prophylactic gastrostomy and surgical reoperation represent significant risk factors. Bowel obstruction might also impact oral feeding autonomy. Prophylactic gastrostomy seems to be a false "good idea" to prevent failure to thrive. This procedure should be indicated case per case. Bowel obstruction and all surgical reoperations represent decisive events that could impact oral feeding autonomy.

Ethical Considerations in Critically Ill Neonatal and Pediatric Patients

The care of critically ill neonates and pediatric patients can be particularly emotionally and ethically challenging. Emerging evidence suggests that we can improve the patient, family, and care team experience in the critical care setting through a better understanding and application of ethical frameworks and communication strategies. We conducted a multidisciplinary panel session at the American Academy of Pediatrics National Conference and Exhibition in the fall of 2022 wherein we explored a myriad of ethical and communication considerations in this unique patient population, with congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) as the congenital anomaly/disease framework. In this review, we will cover state of the art topics in ethics, communication, and palliative care including basic terminology, communication strategies such as trauma-informed communication, establishing/evolving goals of care, futility, medically inappropriate treatment, ethical frameworks, parental discretion, establishing milestones, internal/external intentions, and re-direction of care. These topics will be helpful to many specialties who are involved in the care of critically ill neonates and children including maternal fetal medicine, pediatrics, neonatology, pediatric critical care, palliative care, and pediatric surgery, along with the pediatric surgical subspecialties. We use a theoretical CDH case as an example and include the live audience responses from the interactive session. This primer provides overarching educational principles, as well as practical communication concepts, that can cultivate compassionate multidisciplinary teams, equipped to optimize family-centered, evidence-based compassionate communication and care.

Unsolved problems in CDH follow-up

In patients affected by CDH, survival beyond the neonatal period continues to increase thanks to technological and pharmacological improvements. Conversely, patients, families and caregivers are more and more frequently facing "new" complex late comorbidities, including chronic pulmonary and cardiac dysfunctions, neurodevelopmental challenges, and specific nutritional requirements, that often require ongoing long-term medical or surgical care. Therefore, late morbidity is now a key focus in clinical care of CDH. The aims of this paper are to stress some of the most important "unsolved problems" for CDH patients at long-term follow-up.