Kampo medicines Rikkunshito and Hangeshashinto prevent cisplatin-induced intestinal mucosal injury in rats

Rodent models for anticancer toxicity studies: contributions to drug development and future perspectives

Antineoplastic treatment induces a type of gastrointestinal toxicity known as mucositis. Findings in animal models are usually easily reproducible, and standardized treatment regimens are often used, thus supporting translational science. Essential characteristics of mucositis, including intestinal permeability, inflammation, immune and oxidative responses, and tissue repair mechanisms, can be easily investigated in these models. Given the effects of mucositis on the quality of life of patients with cancer, and the importance of experimental models in the development of more effective new therapeutic alternatives, this review discusses progress and current challenges in using experimental models of mucositis in translational pharmacology research. Teaser Experimental models for studying gastrointestinal mucositis have provided a wealth of information improving the understanding of antineoplastic toxicity.

Experimental Chemotherapy-Induced Mucositis: A Scoping Review Guiding the Design of Suitable Preclinical Models

Mucositis is a common and most debilitating complication associated with the cytotoxicity of chemotherapy. The condition affects the entire alimentary canal from the mouth to the anus and has a significant clinical and economic impact. Although oral and intestinal mucositis can occur concurrently in the same individual, these conditions are often studied independently using organ-specific models that do not mimic human disease. Hence, the purpose of this scoping review was to provide a comprehensive yet systematic overview of the animal models that are utilised in the study of chemotherapy-induced mucositis. A search of PubMed/MEDLINE and Scopus databases was conducted to identify all relevant studies. Multiple phases of filtering were conducted, including deduplication, title/abstract screening, full-text screening, and data extraction. Studies were reported according to the updated Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines. An inter-rater reliability test was conducted using Cohen's Kappa score. After title, abstract, and full-text screening, 251 articles met the inclusion criteria. Seven articles investigated both chemotherapy-induced intestinal and oral mucositis, 198 articles investigated chemotherapy-induced intestinal mucositis, and 46 studies investigated chemotherapy-induced oral mucositis. Among a total of 205 articles on chemotherapy-induced intestinal mucositis, 103 utilised 5-fluorouracil, 34 irinotecan, 16 platinum-based drugs, 33 methotrexate, and 32 other chemotherapeutic agents. Thirteen articles reported the use of a combination of 5-fluorouracil, irinotecan, platinum-based drugs, or methotrexate to induce intestinal mucositis. Among a total of 53 articles on chemotherapy-induced oral mucositis, 50 utilised 5-fluorouracil, 2 irinotecan, 2 methotrexate, 1 topotecan and 1 with other chemotherapeutic drugs. Three articles used a combination of these drugs to induce oral mucositis. Various animal models such as mice, rats, hamsters, piglets, rabbits, and zebrafish were used. The chemotherapeutic agents were introduced at various dosages via three routes of administration. Animals were mainly mice and rats. Unlike intestinal mucositis, most oral mucositis models combined mechanical or chemical irritation with chemotherapy. In conclusion, this extensive assessment of the literature revealed that there was a large variation among studies that reproduce oral and intestinal mucositis in animals. To assist with the design of a suitable preclinical model of chemotherapy-induced alimentary tract mucositis, animal types, routes of administration, dosages, and types of drugs were reported in this study. Further research is required to define an optimal protocol that improves the translatability of findings to humans.

Efficacy of a Traditional Herbal Formula, Banha-Sasim-Tang in Functional Dyspepsia Classified as Excess Pattern

This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of Banha-sasim-tang (BST) in patients with functional dyspepsia (FD). BST (Banxia-xiexin-tang in traditional Chinese medicine and Hange-shashin-to in Kampo medicine) is traditionally prescribed for the treatment of dyspepsia with epigastric stiffness and gastric fullness in China, Japan, and Korea. Patients with FD were randomly administered an oral dose (10 g) of BST syrup or placebo, twice a day for 4 weeks. The primary outcome was the symptom checklist part of the Nepean dyspepsia index (NDI). The secondary outcomes were the quality of life (QoL) part of the NDI, functional dyspepsia-related QoL (FD-QoL), and visual analog scale (VAS). A total of 60 patients with FD were screened, and 50 were randomized into BST group (n = 25) and placebo group (n = 25). Two patients in the placebo group withdrew before the start of the treatment. Administration of BST syrup resulted in improvement in the symptom-related NDI score in the BST group compared with that in the control group; however, the difference was not significant. BST syrup significantly improved "fullness after eating" index of NDI at follow-up time point (2.88 ± 2.65 vs 4.78 ± 2.69, p = 0.0081). In the total score of the QoL section of the NDI and FD-QoL scales, there was no significant improvement in the BST group compared to that in the placebo group. With regard to improvement in overall FD symptoms, the VAS scale showed improvement in both groups, but the difference was not significant. Interestingly, follow-up investigation showed a significantly beneficial effect of BST on FD symptoms, when compared to placebo. Significant improvement observed in VAS score (39.60 ± 22.29 vs 52.17 ± 20.55, p = 0.048). This indicated that the effect of BST lasted even after the completion of the medication regimen. Overall, our data suggest that while BST showed no significant improvement in the symptom-related NDI score and the QoL related scores in NDI and FD-QoL after 4 weeks of treatment, it effectively improved the VAS score and fullness after eating-related symptoms in the follow-up visit. Clinical Trial Registration:https://cris.nih.go.kr; Identifier KCT 0002013.