The PEET procedure: Punch Excision of Epithelialized Tracts for gastrocutaneous fistula closure

An Evaluation of Pediatric Gastrocutaneous Fistula Closure Through the Punch Excision of Epithelized Tract Procedure

BACKGROUND

Persistent gastrocutaneous fistulae frequently complicate gastrostomy tube placement. A minimally invasive technique for tract closure employing balloon catheter retraction and punch excision of the epithelized tract (PEET) was recently reported. We hypothesized the PEET technique of closure would lead to decreased complications without an increased incidence of recurrence.

METHODS

We conducted a single-center retrospective cohort study evaluating children who underwent gastrocutaneous fistula (GCF) closure 1/1/2018-12/31/2021, comparing patients who underwent the PEET procedure to those repaired with layered closure. Procedure duration and outcomes were additionally compared to the 2018-2019 National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) Participant Use File (PUF) database.

RESULTS

Sixty-two children underwent operative GCF closure, including 25 with PEET and 37 traditional layered closure. Procedural time was significantly decreased employing PEET (14 vs 26 minutes, P < .0001), less than half the national median by the NSQIP PUF database of 292 GCF closures (14 vs 34.5 minutes, P < .0001). Those repaired with the PEET method experienced no episodes of recurrence, surgical site infection, readmission, reoperation, or mortality within 30 days of the procedure. Conversely, in traditional closure, there was a 24.3% complication rate, including 7 surgical site infections, 1 readmission, and 2 unplanned reoperations. National procedural complication rate by NSQIP PUF was 5.5%, with a 4.8% rate of surgical site infection, .3% reoperation incidence, and .3% mortality.

DISCUSSION

Our study suggests GCF closure employing the PEET procedure is a safe, more efficient method of tract closure than the traditional layered closure technique.