1
|
Thirnbeck CK, Espinoza ED, Beaman EA, Rozen AL, Dukes KC, Singh H, Herwaldt LA, Landrigan CP, Reisinger HS, Cifra CL. Interfacility Referral Communication for PICU Transfer. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2024; 25:499-511. [PMID: 38483193 PMCID: PMC11153023 DOI: 10.1097/pcc.0000000000003479] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/05/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES For patients requiring transfer to a higher level of care, excellent interfacility communication is essential. Our objective was to characterize verbal handoffs for urgent interfacility transfers of children to the PICU and compare these characteristics with known elements of high-quality intrahospital shift-to-shift handoffs. DESIGN Mixed methods retrospective study of audio-recorded referral calls between referring clinicians and receiving PICU physicians for urgent interfacility PICU transfers. SETTING Academic tertiary referral PICU. PATIENTS Children 0-18 years old admitted to a single PICU following interfacility transfer over a 4-month period (October 2019 to January 2020). INTERVENTIONS None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS We reviewed interfacility referral phone calls for 49 patients. Referral calls between clinicians lasted a median of 9.7 minutes (interquartile range, 6.8-14.5 min). Most referring clinicians provided information on history (96%), physical examination (94%), test results (94%), and interventions (98%). Fewer clinicians provided assessments of illness severity (87%) or code status (19%). Seventy-seven percent of referring clinicians and 6% of receiving PICU physicians stated the working diagnosis. Only 9% of PICU physicians summarized information received. Interfacility handoffs usually involved: 1) indirect references to illness severity and diagnosis rather than explicit discussions, 2) justifications for PICU admission, 3) statements communicating and addressing uncertainty, and 4) statements indicating the referring hospital's reliance on PICU resources. Interfacility referral communication was similar to intrahospital shift-to-shift handoffs with some key differences: 1) use of contextual information for appropriate PICU triage, 2) difference in expertise between communicating clinicians, and 3) reliance of referring clinicians and PICU physicians on each other for accurate information and medical/transport guidance. CONCLUSIONS Interfacility PICU referral communication shared characteristics with intrahospital shift-to-shift handoffs; however, communication did not adhere to known elements of high-quality handovers. Structured tools specific to PICU interfacility referral communication must be developed and investigated for effectiveness in improving communication and patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caitlin K. Thirnbeck
- Division of Critical Care, Department of Pediatrics, Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children’s Hospital, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL
| | - Elizabeth D. Espinoza
- Oregon Health and Science University School of Nursing and School of Medicine, Portland, Oregon
| | | | - Alexis L. Rozen
- University of Iowa College of Public Health, Iowa City, Iowa
| | - Kimberly C. Dukes
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa
| | - Hardeep Singh
- Center for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness and Safety, Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center and Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | - Loreen A. Herwaldt
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Iowa College of Public Health, Iowa City, Iowa
| | - Christopher P. Landrigan
- Division of General Pediatrics, Department of Pediatrics, Boston Children’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
- Division of Sleep and Circadian Disorders, Departments of Medicine and Neurology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Heather Schacht Reisinger
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa
- Institute for Clinical and Translational Science, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa
| | - Christina L. Cifra
- Division of Medical Critical Care, Department of Pediatrics, Boston Children’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
- Division of Critical Care, Stead Family Department of Pediatrics, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Cho IY, Yun JY, Moon SH. Development and effectiveness of a metaverse reality-based family-centered handoff education program in nursing students. J Pediatr Nurs 2024; 76:176-191. [PMID: 38412709 DOI: 10.1016/j.pedn.2024.02.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2023] [Revised: 01/21/2024] [Accepted: 02/07/2024] [Indexed: 02/29/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Effective patient handoffs are vital in pediatric populations. This study aimed to develop and identify the impact of a metaverse-based handoff program using ZEPETO on nursing students' handoff competence, handoff self-efficacy, learning realism, and satisfaction. DESIGN AND METHODS This study used a non-randomized, pre-post nonequivalent group design to develop, implement, and verify a metaverse-based handoff simulation program in a nursing school in South Korea. We assigned 69 senior nursing students from a university to an experimental group or a control group. We developed a metaverse-based, handoff simulation program of family-centered care by building a pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) using ZEPETO. The program included an online lecture, a metaverse rounding discussion, and a metaverse-based handoff simulation of postoperative care for infants with congenital heart disease. We measured handoff competence, handoff self-efficacy, learning realism, and learning satisfaction pre- and post-program. RESULT(S) The experimental group showed significantly higher handoff self-efficacy than the control group (t = 3.17, p = 0.002). No significant differences were found in handoff competency, learning realism, or learning satisfaction between the groups. CONCLUSION(S) This study confirmed that a family-centered care-based handoff metaverse simulation program based on the experiential learning theory enhanced nursing students' handoff self-efficacy. The program equipped students to conduct safe and effective handoffs in real-world clinical settings by providing an immersive learning experience and emphasizing patient-centered communication. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS Based on these results, family-centered, handoff education programs are recommended to be developed that focus on learning realism and learning satisfaction to enhance nursing students' handoff competence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- In Young Cho
- College of Nursing, Chonnam National University, 160 Baekseo-ro, Dong-gu, Gwangju 61469, South Korea
| | - Ji Yeong Yun
- Department of Nursing, Jesus University, 383 Seowon-ro, Wansangu, Jeonju-si, Jeollabukdo 54989, South Korea
| | - Sun-Hee Moon
- College of Nursing, Chonnam National University, 160 Baekseo-ro, Dong-gu, Gwangju 61469, South Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Parikh NR, Francisco LS, Balikai SC, Luangrath MA, Elmore HR, Erdahl J, Badheka A, Chegondi M, Landrigan CP, Pennathur P, Reisinger HS, Cifra CL. Development and Evaluation of I-PASS-to-PICU: A Standard Electronic Template to Improve Referral Communication for Interfacility Transfers to the Pediatric ICU. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf 2024; 50:338-347. [PMID: 38418317 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcjq.2024.01.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/06/2023] [Revised: 01/18/2024] [Accepted: 01/19/2024] [Indexed: 03/01/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Miscommunication during interfacility handoffs to a higher level of care can harm critically ill children. Adapting evidence-based handoff interventions to interfacility referral communication may prevent adverse events. The objective of this project was to develop and evaluate a standard electronic referral template (I-PASS-to-PICU) to improve communication for interfacility pediatric ICU (PICU) transfers. METHODS I-PASS-to-PICU was iteratively developed in a single PICU. A core PICU stakeholder group collaboratively designed an electronic health record (EHR)-supported clinical note template by adapting elements from I-PASS, an evidence-based handoff program, to support information exchange between referring clinicians and receiving PICU physicians. I-PASS-to-PICU is a receiver-driven tool used by PICU physicians to guide verbal communication and electronic documentation during PICU transfer calls. The template underwent three cycles of iterative evaluation and redesign informed by individual and group interviews of multidisciplinary PICU staff, usability testing using simulated and actual referral calls, and debriefing with PICU physicians. RESULTS Individual and group interviews with 21 PICU staff members revealed that relevant, accurate, and concise information was needed for adequate admission preparedness. Time constraints and secondhand information transmission were identified as barriers. Usability testing with six receiving PICU physicians using simulated and actual calls revealed good usability on the validated System Usability Scale (SUS), with a mean score of 77.5 (standard deviation 10.9). Fellows indicated that most fields were relevant and that the template was feasible to use. CONCLUSION I-PASS-to-PICU was technically feasible, usable, and relevant. The authors plan to further evaluate its effectiveness in improving information exchange during real-time PICU practice.
Collapse
|
4
|
Wolski TP, Kunka S, Smith E, Carter R, Rajbhandari P. Streamlining Telecommunications Center and Interfacility Patient Throughput to a Pediatric Emergency Department by Utilizing an Electronic Handoff: A Quality Improvement Initiative. Pediatr Emerg Care 2024:00006565-990000000-00409. [PMID: 38471751 DOI: 10.1097/pec.0000000000003151] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/14/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Effective handoffs are critical for patient safety and high-quality care. The pediatric emergency department serves as the initial reception for patients where optimal communication is crucial. The complexities of interfacility handoffs can result in information loss due to lack of standardization. The aim of our project was a 50% reduction in monthly calls routed through the communication center from 157 to 78, for interfacility transfers to the emergency department from outpatient sites within our organization over a 1-year period, through utilization of an electronic handoff activity. METHODS We designed a quality improvement project in a tertiary care pediatric hospital to improve the process of interfacility transfer. The initiative aimed to streamline the transfer of patients from ambulatory, urgent care, and nurse triage encounters to the pediatric emergency department by using the electronic health record. The primary outcome measure was number of monthly calls received by the telecommunications center for these transfers.Our process measure was tracked by measuring the utilization of the electronic handoff. In addition, the number of safety events reported because of information lost through using the electronic handoff served as a balancing measure. RESULTS One year after the enterprise-wide rollout of the handoff, the telecommunications center was receiving an average of 29 calls per month versus 157 at time of study initiation, a decrease of 81.5%. Monthly usage increased from zero to an average of 544 during the same period. The project was continued after the initial 12-month data collection and demonstrated stability. CONCLUSIONS Our initiative facilitated the safe and efficient transfer of patients and streamlined workflows without sacrificing quality of patient care. Our telecommunications center has been freed up for other tasks with fewer interruptions during patient throughput. Next steps will analyze the encounters of transferred patients to further optimize patient flow at our organization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas P Wolski
- From the Department of Pediatric Emergency Medicine, Clinical Informatics
| | | | | | | | - Prabi Rajbhandari
- Division of Pediatric Hospital Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Akron Children's Hospital, Akron, OH
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Ryan JM, McHugh F, Simiceva A, Eppich W, Kavanagh DO, McNamara DA. Daily handover in surgery: systematic review and a novel taxonomy of interventions and outcomes. BJS Open 2024; 8:zrae011. [PMID: 38426257 PMCID: PMC10905088 DOI: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrae011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2023] [Accepted: 12/17/2023] [Indexed: 03/02/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Poor-quality handovers lead to adverse outcomes for patients; however, there is a lack of evidence to support safe surgical handovers. This systematic review aims to summarize the interventions available to improve end-of-shift surgical handover. A novel taxonomy of interventions and outcomes and a modified quality assessment tool are also described. METHODS Ovid MEDLINE®, PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched for articles up to April 2023. Comparative studies describing interventions for daily in-hospital surgical handovers between doctors were included. Studies were grouped according to their interventions and outcomes. RESULTS In total, 6139 citations were retrieved, and 41 studies met the inclusion criteria. The total patient sample sizes in the control and intervention groups were 11 946 and 11 563 patients, respectively. Most studies were pre-/post-intervention cohort studies (92.7%), and most (73.2%) represented level V evidence. The mean quality assessment score was 53.4% (17.1). A taxonomy of handover interventions and outcomes was developed, with interventions including handover tools, process standardization measures, staff education, and the use of mnemonics. More than 25% of studies used a document as the only intervention. Overall, 55 discrete outcomes were assessed in four categories including process (n = 27), staff (n = 14), patient (n = 12) and system-level (n = 2) outcomes. Significant improvements were seen in 51.8%, 78.5%, 58.3% (n = 9761 versus 9312 patients) and 100% of these outcomes, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Most publications demonstrate that good-quality surgical handover improves outcomes and many interventions appear to be effective; however, studies are methodologically heterogeneous. These novel taxonomies and quality assessment tool will help standardize future studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica M Ryan
- RCSI SIM Centre for Simulation Education and Research, RCSI, Dublin, Ireland
- StAR MD Programme, School of Postgraduate Studies, RCSI, Dublin, Ireland
- Department of Surgery, The Bon Secours Hospital, Glasnevin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Fiachra McHugh
- Department of Surgery, Mayo University Hospital, Mayo, Ireland
| | - Anastasija Simiceva
- RCSI SIM Centre for Simulation Education and Research, RCSI, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Walter Eppich
- RCSI SIM Centre for Simulation Education and Research, RCSI, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Dara O Kavanagh
- Department of Surgical Affairs, RCSI, Dublin, Ireland
- Department of Surgery, Tallaght University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Deborah A McNamara
- Office of the President, RCSI, Dublin, Ireland
- National Clinical Programme in Surgery, RCSI, Dublin, Ireland
- Department of Surgery, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Starmer AJ, Spector ND, O’Toole JK, Bismilla Z, Calaman S, Campos ML, Coffey M, Destino LA, Everhart JL, Goldstein J, Graham DA, Hepps JH, Howell EE, Kuzma N, Maynard G, Melvin P, Patel SJ, Popa A, Rosenbluth G, Schnipper JL, Sectish TC, Srivastava R, West DC, Yu CE, Landrigan CP. Implementation of the I-PASS handoff program in diverse clinical environments: A multicenter prospective effectiveness implementation study. J Hosp Med 2023; 18:5-14. [PMID: 36326255 PMCID: PMC10964397 DOI: 10.1002/jhm.12979] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2022] [Revised: 08/30/2022] [Accepted: 08/31/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Handoff miscommunications are a leading source of medical errors. Harmful medical errors decreased in pediatric academic hospitals following implementation of the I-PASS handoff improvement program. However, implementation across specialties has not been assessed. OBJECTIVE To determine if I-PASS implementation across diverse settings would be associated with improvements in patient safety and communication. DESIGN Prospective Type 2 Hybrid effectiveness implementation study. SETTINGS AND PARTICIPANTS Residents from diverse specialties across 32 hospitals (12 community, 20 academic). INTERVENTION External teams provided longitudinal coaching over 18 months to facilitate implementation of an enhanced I-PASS program and monthly metric reviews. MAIN OUTCOME AND MEASURES Systematic surveillance surveys assessed rates of resident-reported adverse events. Validated direct observation tools measured verbal and written handoff quality. RESULTS 2735 resident physicians and 760 faculty champions from multiple specialties (16 internal medicine, 13 pediatric, 3 other) participated. 1942 error surveillance reports were collected. Major and minor handoff-related reported adverse events decreased 47% following implementation, from 1.7 to 0.9 major events/person-year (p < .05) and 17.5 to 9.3 minor events/person-year (p < .001). Implementation was associated with increased inclusion of all five key handoff data elements in verbal (20% vs. 66%, p < .001, n = 4812) and written (10% vs. 74%, p < .001, n = 1787) handoffs, as well as increased frequency of handoffs with high quality verbal (39% vs. 81% p < .001) and written (29% vs. 78%, p < .001) patient summaries, verbal (29% vs. 78%, p < .001) and written (24% vs. 73%, p < .001) contingency plans, and verbal receiver syntheses (31% vs. 83%, p < .001). Improvement was similar across provider types (adult vs. pediatric) and settings (community vs. academic).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amy J. Starmer
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of General Pediatrics, Boston Children’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Nancy D. Spector
- Section of General Pediatrics, Department of Pediatrics, St. Christopher’s Hospital for Children, Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
- Department of Pediatrics and Executive Leadership in Academic Medicine, Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Jennifer K. O’Toole
- Department of Pediatrics, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| | - Zia Bismilla
- Department of Paediatrics, Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Sharon Calaman
- Section of General Pediatrics, Department of Pediatrics, St. Christopher’s Hospital for Children, Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Maria-Lucia Campos
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of General Pediatrics, Boston Children’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Maitreya Coffey
- Department of Paediatrics, Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Lauren A. Destino
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Hospital Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Lucile Packard Children’s Hospital Stanford, Palo Alto, California, USA
| | - Jennifer L. Everhart
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Hospital Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Lucile Packard Children’s Hospital Stanford, Palo Alto, California, USA
| | - Jenna Goldstein
- Society for Hospital Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Dionne A. Graham
- Program for Patient Safety and Quality, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Jennifer H. Hepps
- Department of Pediatrics, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Eric E. Howell
- Society for Hospital Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Nicholas Kuzma
- Section of General Pediatrics, Department of Pediatrics, St. Christopher’s Hospital for Children, Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Greg Maynard
- Society for Hospital Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Patrice Melvin
- Program for Patient Safety and Quality, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Shilpa J. Patel
- Department of Pediatrics, Kapi’olani Medical Center for Women and Children/University of Hawai’i John A. Burns School of Medicine, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA
| | - Alina Popa
- Department of Medicine, University of California Riverside, Riverside, California, USA
- Division of Hospital Medicine, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California, USA
| | - Glenn Rosenbluth
- Department of Pediatrics, Benioff Children’s Hospital, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Jeffrey L. Schnipper
- Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Theodore C. Sectish
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of General Pediatrics, Boston Children’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Rajendu Srivastava
- Department of Pediatrics, Primary Children’s Hospital, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
- Healthcare Delivery Institute, Intermountain Healthcare, Murray, Utah, USA
| | - Daniel C. West
- Department of Pediatrics, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Clifton E. Yu
- Department of Pediatrics, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Christopher P. Landrigan
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of General Pediatrics, Boston Children’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Departments of Medicine and Neurology, Division of Sleep and Circadian Disorders, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Bowden SG, Siler DA, Shahin MN, Mazur-Hart DJ, Munger DN, Ross MN, O’Neill BE, Nerison CS, Rothbaum M, Han SJ, Wright JM, Orina JN, Winer JL, Selden NR. Effects of 24-hour versus night-float call schedules on the clinical and operative experiences of postgraduate year 2 and 3 neurosurgical residents. Neurosurg Focus 2022; 53:E12. [DOI: 10.3171/2022.5.focus22181] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2022] [Accepted: 05/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE
To comply with the removal of the 88-hour week exemption and to support additional operative experience during junior residency, Oregon Health & Science University (OHSU) switched from a night-float call schedule to a modified 24-hour call schedule on July 1, 2019. This study compared the volumes of clinical, procedural, and operative cases experienced by postgraduate year 2 (PGY-2) and PGY-3 residents under these systems.
METHODS
The authors retrospectively studied billing and related clinical records, call schedules, and Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education case logs for PGY-2 and PGY-3 residents at OHSU, a tertiary academic health center, for the first 4 months of the academic years from 2017 to 2020. The authors analyzed the volumes of new patient consultations, bedside procedures, and operative procedures performed by each PGY-2 and PGY-3 resident during these years, comparing the volumes experienced under each call system.
RESULTS
Changing from a PGY-2 resident–focused night-float call system to a 24-hour call system that was more evenly distributed between PGY-2 and PGY-3 residents resulted in decreased volume of new patient consultations, increased volume of operative procedures, and no change in volume of bedside procedures for PGY-2 residents. PGY-3 residents experienced a decrease in operative procedure volume under the 24-hour call system.
CONCLUSIONS
Transition from a night-float system to a 24-hour call system altered the distribution of clinical and procedural experiences between PGY-2 and PGY-3 residents. Further research is necessary to understand the impact of these changes on educational outcomes, quality and safety of patient care, and resident satisfaction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephen G. Bowden
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon; and
| | - Dominic A. Siler
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon; and
| | - Maryam N. Shahin
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon; and
| | - David J. Mazur-Hart
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon; and
| | - Daniel N. Munger
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon; and
| | - Miner N. Ross
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon; and
| | - Brannan E. O’Neill
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon; and
| | - Caleb S. Nerison
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon; and
| | - Michael Rothbaum
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon; and
| | - Seunggu J. Han
- Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California
| | - James M. Wright
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon; and
| | - Josiah N. Orina
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon; and
| | - Jesse L. Winer
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon; and
| | - Nathan R. Selden
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon; and
| |
Collapse
|