Racial/ethnic differences in receipt of surgery among children in the United States

A Scoping Review of Limited English Proficiency and Immigration in Pediatric Surgery

INTRODUCTION

With increasing globalization and diversity, the intersection of immigration and language barriers can impact patient outcomes. This scope review aims to summarize current evidence on immigration and language barriers on pediatric surgical outcomes.

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines. Four databases were searched with Medical Subject Heading terms describing pediatric surgery, immigration, limited English proficiency (LEP), and refugees between 2000-2023. Four independent reviewers screened and analyzed texts for final inclusion.

RESULTS

Thirty-three studies were included. Ten studies described disease incidence and severity, finding that LEP, immigrant, and refugee patients were more likely to present with severe disease in appendicitis and traumatic injuries. five studies described pain management, finding patients with LEP received fewer pain assessments, waited longer for analgesia, and had more discrepancies in pain scores. Seventeen studies investigated treatment receipt and delay, finding that immigrants and patients with LEP had longer time to and reduced rates of treatment. Seventeen studies described surgical outcomes, finding that patients with LEP have longer length of stay and more postoperative emergency department visits but fewer follow-up appointments. In kidney transplants, patients with LEP and immigrants had worse outcomes, but these trends are not seen in immigrants from Europe. Overall, immigrants and refugees have higher rates of complications and mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Immigrants and patients with LEP and are more likely to present with advanced disease and severe injuries, receive inadequate pain management, experience delays in surgery, and suffer more complications. There is continued need to assess the impact of LEP and immigration on pediatric surgery outcomes.

The role of cultural competency training to address health disparities in surgical settings

BACKGROUND

Disparities in health care delivered to marginalized groups are unjust and result in poor health outcomes that increase the cost of care for everyone. These disparities are largely avoidable and health care providers, have been targeted with education and specialised training to address these disparities.

SOURCES OF DATA

In this manuscript we have sought out both peer-reviewed material on Pubmed, as well as policy statements on the potential role of cultural competency training (CCT) for providers in the surgical care setting. The goal of undertaking this work was to determine whether there is evidence that these endeavours are effective at reducing disparities.

AREAS OF AGREEMENT

The unjustness of health care disparities is universally accepted.

AREAS OF CONTROVERSY

Whether the outcome of CCT justifies the cost has not been effectively answered.

GROWING POINTS

These include the structure/content of the CCT and whether the training should be delivered to teams in the surgical setting.

AREAS TIMELY FOR DEVELOPING RESEARCH

Because health outcomes are affected by many different inputs, should the effectiveness of CCT be improvement in health outcomes or should we use a proxy or a surrogate of health outcomes.

Using the Social Vulnerability Index to Analyze Statewide Health Disparities in Cholecystectomy

INTRODUCTION

Addressing the effects of social determinants of health in surgery has become a national priority. We evaluated the utility of the Social Vulnerability Index (SVI) in determining the likelihood of receiving cholecystectomy for cholecystitis in Texas.

METHODS

A retrospective study of adults with cholecystitis in the Texas Hospital Inpatient Discharge Public Use Data File and Texas Outpatient Surgical and Radiological Procedure Data Public Use Data File from 2016 to 2019. Patients were stratified into SVI quartiles, with the lowest quartile as low vulnerability, the middle two as average vulnerability, and the highest as high vulnerability. The relative risk (RR) of undergoing surgery was calculated using average vulnerability as the reference category and subgroup sensitivity analyses.

RESULTS

A total of 67,548 cases were assessed, of which 48,603 (72.0%) had surgery. Compared with the average SVI groups, the low vulnerability groups were 21% more likely to undergo cholecystectomy (RR = 1.21, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.18-1.24), whereas the high vulnerability groups were 9% less likely to undergo cholecystectomy (RR = 0.91, 95% CI 0.88-0.93). The adjusted model showed similar results (RR = 1.05, 95% CI 1.04-1.06 and RR = 0.97, 95% CI 0.96-0.99, for low and high vulnerability groups, respectively). These results remained significant after stratifying for age, sex, ethnicity, and insurance status. However, the differences between low, average, and high vulnerability groups diminished in rural settings, with lower surgery rates in all groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with higher SVI were less likely to receive an elective cholecystectomy. SVI is an effective method of identifying social determinants impacting access to and receipt of surgical care.

Post-operative Opioid Reduction Protocol Reduces Racial Disparity in Clinical Outcomes in Children

INTRODUCTION

Racial disparities in health outcomes continue to exist for children requiring surgery. Previous investigations suggest that clinical protocols may reduce racial disparities. A post-operative opioid reduction protocol was implemented in children undergoing abdominal surgery who were less than 1 years old at a tertiary level hospital. The purpose of this investigation was to determine if the clinical protocol was associated with a reduction in racial disparity in post-operative opioid prescribing patterns and associated clinical outcomes.

METHODS

A post-operative opioid reduction protocol based on standing intravenous acetaminophen, educational sessions with nursing staff, and standardized post-operative sign-out between the surgical and NICU teams was implemented in children under 1 year old in 2016. A time series and before and after analysis was conducted using a historical pre-intervention cohort (Jan 2011-Dec 2015) and prospectively collected post-intervention cohort (Jan 2016-Jan 2021). Primary outcomes included post-operative opioid use and post-operative pain scores stratified by race. Secondary outcomes included associated clinical outcomes also stratified by race.

RESULTS

A total of 249 children were included in the investigation, 117 in the pre-intervention group and 132 in the post intervention group. The majority of patients in both cohorts were either White or Black. The two cohorts were equally matched in terms of pre-operative clinical variables. In the pre-intervention cohort, the median post-operative morphine equivalents in White children was 2.1 mg/kg (IQR 0.2, 11.1) while in Black children it was 13.1 mg/kg (IQR 2.4, 65.3), p-value = 0.0352. In the post-intervention cohort, the median value for White children and Black children was statistically identical (0.05 mg/kg (IQR 0, 0.5) and 0.0 mg/kg (IQR 0, 0.3), respectively, p-value = 0.237). This pattern was also demonstrated in clinical variables including length of stay, intubation length and total parenteral nutrition use. In the pre-intervention cohort, the total length of stay for white children was 16 days while for black children it was 45 days (p = 0.007). In the postintervention cohort the length of stay for both White and Black children were identical at 8 days (p = 0.748).

CONCLUSION

The use of a clinical opioid reduction protocol implemented at a tertiary medical center was associated with a reduction in racial disparity in opioid prescribing habits in children. Prior to the protocol, there was a racial disparity in clinical variables associated with prolonged opioid use including length of stay, TPN use, and intubation length. The clinical protocol reduced variability in opioid prescribing patterns in all racial groups which was associated with a reduction in variability in associated clinical variables.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Racial Disparities in Pediatric Mortality Following Transfusion Within 72 Hours of Operation

BACKGROUND

Postoperative bleeding and transfusion are correlated with mortality risk. Furthermore, postoperative bleeding may often initiate the cascade of complications that leads to death. Given that minority children have increased risk of surgical complications, this study aimed to investigate the association of race with pediatric surgical mortality following postoperative transfusion.

METHODS

We used the NSQIP-P PUF to assemble a retrospective cohort of children <18 who underwent inpatient surgery during 2012-2021. We included White, Black, Hispanic, and 'Other' children who received a transfusion within 72 h of surgery. The primary outcome was defined as all-cause mortality within 30 days following the primary surgical procedure. Using logistic regression models, we estimated the risk-adjusted odds ratio (aOR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) of mortality, comparing each racial/ethnic cohort to White children.

RESULTS

A total of 466,230 children <18 years of age underwent inpatient surgical procedures from 2012 to 2021. Of these, 46,200 required transfusion and were included in our analysis. The majority of patients were non-Hispanic White (64.6%, n = 29,850), while 18.9% (n = 8752) were non-Hispanic Black, 11.7% (n = 5387) were Hispanic, and 4.8% (n = 2211) were 'Other' race. The overall rate of mortality following transfusion was 2.5%. White children had the lowest incidence of mortality (2.0%), compared to children of 'Other' race (2.5%), Hispanic children (3.1%), and Black children (3.6%). After adjusting for sex, age, comorbidities, case status, preoperative transfusion within 48 h, and year of operation, we found that Black children experienced 1.24 times the odds of mortality following a postoperative transfusion compared to a White child (aOR: 1.24; 95%CI, 1.03-1.51; P = 0.025). Hispanic children were also significantly more likely to die following a postoperative transfusion than White children (aOR: 1.19; 95%CI, 1.02-1.39; P = 0.027).

CONCLUSION

We found that minority children who required a postoperative transfusion had a higher odds of death than White children. Future studies should explore adverse events following postoperative transfusion and the differences in their management by race that may contribute to the higher mortality rate for minority children.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II.

CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER AND REGISTRY

Not applicable.

Racial Inequity in Pediatric Anesthesia

Purpose of Review

Minority health disparities have received renewed attention in the USA following several highly publicized racial injustices in 2020. Though the focus has been largely on adults, children are not immune to these inequities. By reviewing racial disparities in pediatric perioperative care, we aim to engage the anesthesia community in the fight against systemic racism.

Recent Findings

Minority children have higher rates of anesthetic and surgical morbidity compared to White children, including respiratory events, length of stay, hospital costs, and even death. These inequities occur across surgical specialties and environments.

Summary

Racial disparities in the perioperative health and management of children are ubiquitous. Herein, we will summarize recent pediatric health disparity literature, discuss some important contributors to persistent inequities, and propose avenues for anesthesiologists to impact the pursuit of equitable healthcare outcomes.