Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection of Gastric Superficial Lesions: Predictors for Time of Procedure in a Portuguese Center

Predictive Factors for the Outcome of Unsupervised Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection During the Initial Learning Curve with Prevalence-Based Indication

BACKGROUND

For an adequate educational strategy of ESD in non-Asian settings with prevalence-based indication it is essential to define adequate lesions, suitable for the beginner without on-site expert-supervision.

AIMS

We analyzed possible predictors for outcome parameters of effectiveness and safety during the initial learning curve.

METHODS

The first 120 ESDs of four operators (n = 480), performed between 2007 and 2020 in four tertiary hospitals, were enrolled. Uni-/multivariable regression analysis was done with sex, age, pretreated lesion, lesion size, organ, and organ-based localization as possible independent predictors for en bloc resection (EBR), complication, and resection speed.

RESULTS

Rates of EBR, complication, and resection speed were 84.5%, 14.2%, and 6.20 (± 4.45) cm2/h. Independent predictors for EBR were pretreated lesion (OR 0.27 [0.13-0.57], p < 0.001) and non-colonic ESD (OR 2.29 [1.26-4.17] (rectum)/5.72 [2.36-13.89] (stomach)/7.80 [2.60-23.42] (esophagus), p < 0.001), for complication pretreated lesion (OR 3.04 [1.46-6.34], p < 0.001) and lesion size (OR 1.02 [1.004-1.04], p = 0.012) and for resection speed pretreated lesion (RC - 3.10 [- 4.39 to - 1.81], p < 0.001), lesion size (RC 0.13 [0.11-0.16], p < 0.001) and male patient (RC - 1.11 [- 1.85 to - 0.37], p < 0.001). We found no significant difference in the incidence of technically unsuccessful resections in esophageal (1/84), gastric (3/113), rectal (7/181), and colonic (3/101) ESDs (p = 0.76). Technical failure was mainly caused by complication and fibrosis/pretreatment.

CONCLUSION

During the initial learning curve of an unsupervised ESD program with prevalence-based indication, pretreated lesions and colonic ESDs should be avoided. In contrast, lesion size and organ-based localizations have less predictive value for the outcome.

Associate factors for endoscopic submucosal dissection operation time and postoperative delayed hemorrhage of early gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a treatment for early gastric cancer with the advantages of small invasion, fewer complications, and a low local recurrence rate. However, there is a high risk of complications such as bleeding and perforation, and the operation time is also longer. ESD operation time is closely related to bleeding and perforation.

AIM

To investigate the influencing factors associated with ESD operation time and postoperative delayed hemorrhage to provide a reference for early planning, early identification, and prevention of complications.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study based on the clinical data of 520 patients with early gastric cancer in the Second Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical University from January 2019 to December 2021. The baseline data, clinical features, and endoscopic and pathological characteristics of patients were collected. The multivariate linear regression model was used to investigate the influencing factors of ESD operation time. Logistic regression analysis was carried out to evaluate the influencing factors of postoperative delayed hemorrhage.

RESULTS

The multivariate analysis of ESD operation time showed that the maximum lesion diameter could affect 8.815% of ESD operation time when other influencing factors remained unchanged. The operation time increased by 3.766% or 10.247% if the lesion was mixed or concave. The operation time increased by 4.417% if combined with an ulcer or scar. The operation time increased by 3.692% if combined with perforation. If infiltrated into the submucosa, it increased by 2.536%. Multivariate analysis of delayed hemorrhage after ESD showed that the maximum diameter of the lesion, lesion morphology, and ESD operation time were independent influencing factors for delayed hemorrhage after ESD. Patients with lesion ≥ 3.0 cm (OR = 3.785, 95%CI: 1.165-4.277), lesion morphology-concave (OR = 10.985, 95%CI: 2.133-35.381), and ESD operation time ≥ 60 min (OR = 2.958, 95%CI: 1.117-3.526) were prone to delayed hemorrhage after ESD.

CONCLUSION

If the maximum diameter of the lesion in patients with early gastric cancer is ≥ 3.0 cm, and the shape of the lesion is concave, or accompanied by an ulcer or scar, combined with perforation, and infiltrates into the submucosa, the ESD operation will take a longer time. When the maximum diameter of the lesion is ≥ 3.0 cm, the shape of the lesion is concave in patients and the operation time of ESD takes longer time, the risk of delayed hemorrhage after ESD is higher.

Gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection: a systematic review and meta-analysis on risk factors for poor short-term outcomes

OBJECTIVE

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is now established as the first option to manage early gastric neoplasms, but its efficacy may vary according to diverse factors. We aimed to systematically identify risk factors for poor short-term outcomes of gastric ESD with the purpose to improve patients' selection and management.

METHODS

Three online databases (MEDLINE, ISI Web of Knowledge and Scopus) were searched (last search on June 2018) for poor outcomes of gastric ESD (deep submucosal invasion, piecemeal/incomplete resection, noncurative resection and local recurrence).

RESULTS

One hundred five studies were included referring to 52.126 ESDs. Undifferentiated histology and upper location (vs lower) were associated with submucosal invasion [odds ratio (OR) = 2.42 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.62-3.61] and OR = 3.20 (1.04-9.86), respectively] and deep submucosal invasion [OR = 2.98 (2.02-4.39) and OR = 2.35 (1.45-3.81), respectively]. Lesion size greater than 30 mm and ulceration were associated with piecemeal resection [OR = 2.78 (1.17-6.60) and OR = 2.76 (1.23, 6.20), respectively]. Lesion size greater than 30 mm, ulceration, upper location and fibrosis were risk factors for incomplete resection [OR = 3.83 (2.68-5.49), OR = 4.06 (1.62-10.16), OR = 3.71 (2.49-5.54) and OR = 4.46 (1.66-11.96), respectively]. A noncurative resection was more often observed for lesions located in the upper third of the stomach [OR = 1.49 (1.24-1.79)], depressed morphology [OR = 1.49 (1.04-2.12)] and those outside standard criteria [OR = 3.56 (2.31-5.48)]. Older age was significantly linked with local recurrence rates [OR = 3.08 (1.13-5.02)].

CONCLUSION

Several risk factors influence poor efficacy short-term outcomes of gastric ESD that may be used to inform both patients and health providers about the expected efficacy.