Suppression of the acute upregulation of phosphorylated-extracellular regulated kinase in ventral tegmental area by a μ-opioid receptor agonist is related to resistance to rewarding effects in a mouse model of bone cancer

The antagonistic activity profile of naloxone in μ-opioid receptor agonist-induced psychological dependence

Naloxone is a μ-opioid receptor antagonist that has been used to prevent overdose-related respiratory depression and deaths by the illicit use of opioids. Naloxone can also deter the abuse potential of opioids, but little has been reported regarding its antagonistic activity profile against opioid-induced psychological dependence. This study aimed to confirm the antagonistic activity profile of naloxone against several μ-opioid receptor agonists and investigate whether naloxone could affect the psychological dependence induced by widely used μ-opioid receptor agonist, oxycodone. In the Guanosine-5'-o-(3-thio) triphosphate (GTPγS) binding assay, naloxone (30-30,000 nM) inhibited the GTPγS binding induced by oxycodone, hydrocodone, morphine, and fentanyl. It elicited parallel rightward shifts in the concentration-response curves, indicating that naloxone possessed a competitive antagonistic activity profile against these μ-opioid receptor agonists. In the conditioned place preference test, oxycodone (0.01-1 mg/kg, i.v.) produced dose-dependent increases in place preference. The increased place preference induced by oxycodone (1 mg/kg) was significantly attenuated by co-administration of naloxone at a dose of 0.5 mg/kg but not 0.01 mg/kg. Naloxone (0.5 mg/kg, i.v.) also blocked oxycodone (1 mg/kg)-induced dopamine release in nucleus accumbens; however, at a lower dose (0.01 mg/kg), it did not affect the intrinsic dopamine release by oxycodone. These results indicate that the psychological dependence of oxycodone could be antagonized by naloxone, depending on the dose. This characterization might lead to a better understanding of the competitive antagonistic activity profile of naloxone for μ-opioid receptor in the brain.

Endogenous opiates and behavior: 2017

This paper is the fortieth consecutive installment of the annual anthological review of research concerning the endogenous opioid system, summarizing articles published during 2017 that studied the behavioral effects of molecular, pharmacological and genetic manipulation of opioid peptides and receptors as well as effects of opioid/opiate agonists and antagonists. The review is subdivided into the following specific topics: molecular-biochemical effects and neurochemical localization studies of endogenous opioids and their receptors (1), the roles of these opioid peptides and receptors in pain and analgesia in animals (2) and humans (3), opioid-sensitive and opioid-insensitive effects of nonopioid analgesics (4), opioid peptide and receptor involvement in tolerance and dependence (5), stress and social status (6), learning and memory (7), eating and drinking (8), drug abuse and alcohol (9), sexual activity and hormones, pregnancy, development and endocrinology (10), mental illness and mood (11), seizures and neurologic disorders (12), electrical-related activity and neurophysiology (13), general activity and locomotion (14), gastrointestinal, renal and hepatic functions (15), cardiovascular responses (16), respiration and thermoregulation (17), and immunological responses (18).

Bone Metastasis Pain, from the Bench to the Bedside

Bone is the most frequent site of metastasis of the most common cancers in men and women. Bone metastasis incidence has been steadily increasing over the years, mainly because of higher life expectancy in oncologic patients. Although bone metastases are sometimes asymptomatic, their consequences are most often devastating, impairing both life quality and expectancy, due to the occurrence of the skeletal-related events, including bone fractures, hypercalcemia and spinal cord compression. Up to 75% of patients endure crippling cancer-induced bone pain (CIBP), against which we have very few weapons. This review’s purpose is to discuss the molecular and cellular mechanisms that lead to CIBP, including how cancer cells convert the bone “virtuous cycle” into a cancer-fuelling “vicious cycle”, and how this leads to the release of molecular mediators of pain, including protons, neurotrophins, interleukins, chemokines and ATP. Preclinical tests and assays to evaluate CIBP, including the incapacitance tester (in vivo), and neuron/glial activation in the dorsal root ganglia/spinal cord (ex vivo) will also be presented. Furthermore, current therapeutic options for CIBP are quite limited and nonspecific and they will also be discussed, along with up-and-coming options that may render CIBP easier to treat and let patients forget they are patients.

Mice with cancer-induced bone pain show a marked decline in day/night activity

INTRODUCTION

Cancer-induced bone pain (CIBP) is the most common type of pain with cancer. In humans, this pain can be difficult to control and highly disabling. A major problem with CIBP in humans is that it increases on weight-bearing and/or movement of a tumor-bearing bone limiting the activity and functional status of the patient. Currently, there is less data concerning whether similar negative changes in activity occur in rodent models of CIBP.

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether there are marked changes in activity in a rodent model of CIBP and compare this to changes in skin hypersensitivity.

METHODS

Osteosarcoma cells were injected and confined to 1 femur of the adult male mouse. Every 7 days, spontaneous horizontal and vertical activities were assessed over a 20-hour day and night period using automated activity boxes. Mechanical hypersensitivity of the hind paw skin was assessed using von Frey testing.

RESULTS

As the tumor cells grew within the femur, there was a significant decline in horizontal and vertical activity during the times of the day/night when the mice are normally most active. Mice also developed significant hypersensitivity in the skin of the hind paw in the tumor-bearing limb.

CONCLUSION

Even when the tumor is confined to a single load-bearing bone, CIBP drives a significant loss of activity, which increases with disease progression. Understanding the mechanisms that drive this reduction in activity may allow the development of therapies that allow CIBP patients to better maintain their activity and functional status.