1
|
Hakimjavadi R, Hong HA, Fallah N, Humphreys S, Kingwell S, Stratton A, Tsai E, Wai EK, Walden K, Noonan VK, Phan P. Enabling knowledge translation: implementation of a web-based tool for independent walking prediction after traumatic spinal cord injury. Front Neurol 2023; 14:1219307. [PMID: 38116110 PMCID: PMC10728823 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1219307] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2023] [Accepted: 11/13/2023] [Indexed: 12/21/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Several clinical prediction rules (CPRs) have been published, but few are easily accessible or convenient for clinicians to use in practice. We aimed to develop, implement, and describe the process of building a web-based CPR for predicting independent walking 1-year after a traumatic spinal cord injury (TSCI). Methods Using the published and validated CPR, a front-end web application called "Ambulation" was built using HyperText Markup Language (HTML), Cascading Style Sheets (CSS), and JavaScript. A survey was created using QualtricsXM Software to gather insights on the application's usability and user experience. Website activity was monitored using Google Analytics. Ambulation was developed with a core team of seven clinicians and researchers. To refine the app's content, website design, and utility, 20 professionals from different disciplines, including persons with lived experience, were consulted. Results After 11 revisions, Ambulation was uploaded onto a unique web domain and launched (www.ambulation.ca) as a pilot with 30 clinicians (surgeons, physiatrists, and physiotherapists). The website consists of five web pages: Home, Calculation, Team, Contact, and Privacy Policy. Responses from the user survey (n = 6) were positive and provided insight into the usability of the tool and its clinical utility (e.g., helpful in discharge planning and rehabilitation), and the overall face validity of the CPR. Since its public release on February 7, 2022, to February 28, 2023, Ambulation had 594 total users, 565 (95.1%) new users, 26 (4.4%) returning users, 363 (61.1%) engaged sessions (i.e., the number of sessions that lasted 10 seconds/longer, had one/more conversion events e.g., performing the calculation, or two/more page or screen views), and the majority of the users originating from the United States (39.9%) and Canada (38.2%). Discussion Ambulation is a CPR for predicting independent walking 1-year after TSCI and it can assist frontline clinicians with clinical decision-making (e.g., time to surgery or rehabilitation plan), patient education and goal setting soon after injury. This tool is an example of adapting a validated CPR for independent walking into an easily accessible and usable web-based tool for use in clinical practice. This study may help inform how other CPRs can be adopted into clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Heather A. Hong
- Praxis Spinal Cord Institute, Blusson Spinal Cord Centre, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Nader Fallah
- Praxis Spinal Cord Institute, Blusson Spinal Cord Centre, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, The University of British Columbia, UBC Hospital, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Suzanne Humphreys
- Praxis Spinal Cord Institute, Blusson Spinal Cord Centre, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Stephen Kingwell
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
- Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Alexandra Stratton
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
- Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Eve Tsai
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
- Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Eugene K. Wai
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
- Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Kristen Walden
- Praxis Spinal Cord Institute, Blusson Spinal Cord Centre, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Vanessa K. Noonan
- Praxis Spinal Cord Institute, Blusson Spinal Cord Centre, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- International Collaboration on Repair Discoveries (ICORD), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Philippe Phan
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
- Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Naye F, Décary S, Houle C, LeBlanc A, Cook C, Dugas M, Skidmore B, Tousignant-Laflamme Y. Six Externally Validated Prognostic Models Have Potential Clinical Value to Predict Patient Health Outcomes in the Rehabilitation of Musculoskeletal Conditions: A Systematic Review. Phys Ther 2023; 103:7066982. [PMID: 37245218 DOI: 10.1093/ptj/pzad021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2022] [Revised: 06/21/2022] [Accepted: 01/06/2023] [Indexed: 05/30/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The purpose of this systematic review was to identify and appraise externally validated prognostic models to predict a patient's health outcomes relevant to physical rehabilitation of musculoskeletal (MSK) conditions. METHODS We systematically reviewed 8 databases and reported our findings according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis 2020. An information specialist designed a search strategy to identify externally validated prognostic models for MSK conditions. Paired reviewers independently screened the title, abstract, and full text and conducted data extraction. We extracted characteristics of included studies (eg, country and study design), prognostic models (eg, performance measures and type of model) and predicted clinical outcomes (eg, pain and disability). We assessed the risk of bias and concerns of applicability using the prediction model risk of bias assessment tool. We proposed and used a 5-step method to determine which prognostic models were clinically valuable. RESULTS We found 4896 citations, read 300 full-text articles, and included 46 papers (37 distinct models). Prognostic models were externally validated for the spine, upper limb, lower limb conditions, and MSK trauma, injuries, and pain. All studies presented a high risk of bias. Half of the models showed low concerns for applicability. Reporting of calibration and discrimination performance measures was often lacking. We found 6 externally validated models with adequate measures, which could be deemed clinically valuable [ie, (1) STart Back Screening Tool, (2) Wallis Occupational Rehabilitation RisK model, (3) Da Silva model, (4) PICKUP model, (5) Schellingerhout rule, and (6) Keene model]. Despite having a high risk of bias, which is mostly explained by the very conservative properties of the PROBAST tool, the 6 models remain clinically relevant. CONCLUSION We found 6 externally validated prognostic models developed to predict patients' health outcomes that were clinically relevant to the physical rehabilitation of MSK conditions. IMPACT Our results provide clinicians with externally validated prognostic models to help them better predict patients' clinical outcomes and facilitate personalized treatment plans. Incorporating clinically valuable prognostic models could inherently improve the value of care provided by physical therapists.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Florian Naye
- School of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada
- Clinical Research of the Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke (CRCHUS), Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada
| | - Simon Décary
- Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Pavillon Ferdinand-Vandry, Université Laval, Quebec, Quebec, Canada
- Tier 1 Canada Research Chair in Shared Decision Making and Knowledge Translation, Centre de recherche sur les soins et les services de première ligne de l'Université Laval (CERSSPL-UL), Quebec, Quebec, Canada
| | - Catherine Houle
- School of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada
- Clinical Research of the Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke (CRCHUS), Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada
| | - Annie LeBlanc
- Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Pavillon Ferdinand-Vandry, Université Laval, Quebec, Quebec, Canada
| | - Chad Cook
- Physical Therapy Division, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Michèle Dugas
- VITAM Research Center, Centre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et de Services Sociaux de la Capitale-Nationale, Quebec, Quebec, Canada
| | - Becky Skidmore
- Independent Information Specialist, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Yannick Tousignant-Laflamme
- School of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada
- Clinical Research of the Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke (CRCHUS), Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Karstens S, Zebisch J, Wey J, Hilfiker R, Hill JC. Validation of the German version of the STarT-MSK-Tool: A cohort study with patients from physiotherapy clinics. PLoS One 2022; 17:e0269694. [PMID: 35776764 PMCID: PMC9249194 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0269694] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2021] [Accepted: 05/25/2022] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The STarT-MSK-Tool is an adaptation of the well established STarT-Back-Tool, used to risk-stratify patients with a wider range of musculoskeletal presentations. OBJECTIVE To formally translate and cross-culturally adapt the Keele STarT-MSK risk stratification tool into German (STarT-MSKG) and to establish its reliability and validity. METHODS A formal, multi-step, forward and backward translation approach was used. To assess validity patients aged ≥18 years, with acute, subacute or chronic musculoskeletal presentations in the lumbar spine, hip, knee, shoulder, or neck were included. The prospective cohort was used with initial data collected electronically at the point-of-consultation. Retest and 6-month follow-up questionnaires were sent by email. Test-retest reliability, construct validity, discriminative ability, predictive ability and floor or ceiling effects were analysed using intraclass correlation coefficient, and comparisons with a reference standard (Orebro-Musculoskeletal-Pain-Questionnaire: OMPQ) using correlations, ROC-curves and regression models. RESULTS The participants' (n = 287) mean age was 47 (SD = 15.8) years, 51% were female, with 48.8% at low, 43.6% at medium, and 7.7% at high risk. With ICC = 0.75 (95% CI 0.69; 0.81) test-retest-reliability was good. Construct validity was good with correlations for the STarT-MSKG-Tool against the OMPQ-Tool of rs = 0.74 (95% CI 0.68, 0.79). The ability of the tool [comparison OMPQ] to predict 6-month pain and disability was acceptable with AUC = 0.77 (95% CI 0.71, 0.83) [OMPQ = 0.74] and 0.76 (95% CI 0.69, 0.82) [OMPQ = 0.72] respectively. However, the explained variance (linear/logistic regression) for predicting 6-month pain (21% [OMPQ = 17%]/logistic = 29%) and disability (linear = 20%:[OMPQ = 19%]/logistic = 26%), whilst being comparable to the existing OMPQ reference standard, fell short of the a priori target of ≥30%. CONCLUSIONS The German version of the STarT-MSK-Tool is a valid instrument for use across multiple musculoskeletal conditions and is availabe for use in clinical practice. Comparison with the OMPQ suggests it is a good alternative.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sven Karstens
- Department of Computer Science, Therapeutic Sciences, Trier University of Applied Sciences, Trier, Germany
- * E-mail:
| | | | - Johannes Wey
- Department of Computer Science, Formerly Therapeutic Sciences, Trier University of Applied Sciences, Trier, Germany
| | - Roger Hilfiker
- School of Health Sciences, HES-SO Valais-Wallis, Leukerbad, Switzerland
| | - Jonathan C. Hill
- School of Medicine, Keele University, Staffordshire, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Wingbermühle RW, Chiarotto A, Koes B, Heymans MW, van Trijffel E. Challenges and solutions in prognostic prediction models in spinal disorders. J Clin Epidemiol 2021; 132:125-130. [PMID: 33359321 DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.12.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2020] [Revised: 12/01/2020] [Accepted: 12/14/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Methodological shortcomings in prognostic modeling for patients with spinal disorders are highly common. This general commentary discusses methodological challenges related to the specific nature of this field. Five specific methodological challenges in prognostic modeling for patients with spinal disorders are presented with their potential solutions, as related to the choice of study participants, purpose of studies, limitations in measurements of outcomes and predictors, complexity of recovery predictions, and confusion of prognosis and treatment response. Large studies specifically designed for prognostic model research are needed, using standard baseline measurement sets, clearly describing participants' recruitment and accounting and correcting for measurement limitations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roel W Wingbermühle
- SOMT University of Physiotherapy, Amersfoort, The Netherlands; Department of General Practice, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Alessandro Chiarotto
- Department of General Practice, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Science, VU University, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bart Koes
- Department of General Practice, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Center for Muscle and Joint Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense M, Denmark
| | - Martijn W Heymans
- Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Emiel van Trijffel
- SOMT University of Physiotherapy, Amersfoort, The Netherlands; Experimental Anatomy Research Department, Department of Physiotherapy, Human physiology and Anatomy, Faculty of Physical Education and Physiotherapy, Vrije Universiteit Brussels, Brussels, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Lorent M, Maalmi H, Tessier P, Supiot S, Dantan E, Foucher Y. Meta-analysis of predictive models to assess the clinical validity and utility for patient-centered medical decision making: application to the CAncer of the Prostate Risk Assessment (CAPRA). BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2019; 19:2. [PMID: 30616621 PMCID: PMC6323757 DOI: 10.1186/s12911-018-0727-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2018] [Accepted: 12/21/2018] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment (CAPRA) score was designed and validated several times to predict the biochemical recurrence-free survival after a radical prostatectomy. Our objectives were, first, to study the clinical validity of the CAPRA score, and, second, to assess its clinical utility for stratified medicine from an original patient-centered approach. METHODS We proposed a meta-analysis based on a literature search using MEDLINE. Observed and predicted biochemical-recurrence-free survivals were compared to assess the calibration of the CAPRA score. Discriminative capacities were evaluated by estimating the summary time-dependent ROC curve. The clinical utility of the CAPRA score was evaluated according to the following stratified decisions: active monitoring for low-risk patients, prostatectomy for intermediate-risk patients, or radio-hormonal therapy for high risk patients. For this purpose, we assessed CAPRA's clinical utility in terms of its ability to maximize time-dependent utility functions (i.e. Quality-Adjusted Life-Years - QALYs). RESULTS We identified 683 manuscripts and finally retained 9 studies. We reported good discriminative capacities with an area under the SROCt curve at 0.73 [95%CI from 0.67 to 0.79], while graphical calibration seemed acceptable. Nevertheless, we also described that the CAPRA score was unable to discriminate between the three medical alternatives, i.e. it did not allow an increase in the number of life years in perfect health (QALYs) of patients with prostate cancer. CONCLUSIONS We confirmed the prognostic capacities of the CAPRA score. In contrast, we were not able to demonstrate its clinical usefulness for stratified medicine from a patient-centered perspective. Our results also highlighted the confusion between clinical validity and utility. This distinction should be better considered in order to develop predictive tools useful in practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marine Lorent
- SPHERE (methodS in Patient-centered outcomes & HEalth ResEarch) U1246, INSERM, Nantes University, Tours University, Nantes, France
| | - Haïfa Maalmi
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Philippe Tessier
- SPHERE (methodS in Patient-centered outcomes & HEalth ResEarch) U1246, INSERM, Nantes University, Tours University, Nantes, France
| | - Stéphane Supiot
- Department of Radiotherapy, Institut de Cancérologie de l’Ouest René Gauducheau, Saint Herblain, France
- INSERM UMR892, Nantes University, Nantes, France
| | - Etienne Dantan
- SPHERE (methodS in Patient-centered outcomes & HEalth ResEarch) U1246, INSERM, Nantes University, Tours University, Nantes, France
| | - Yohann Foucher
- SPHERE (methodS in Patient-centered outcomes & HEalth ResEarch) U1246, INSERM, Nantes University, Tours University, Nantes, France
- Nantes University Hospital, Nantes, France
- IRS2, SPHERE U1246, 22 boulevard Bénoni Goullin, 44200 Nantes, France
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Saluja V, Sharma A, Pasupuleti SS, Mitra LG, Kumar G, Agarwal PM. Comparison of Prognostic Models in Acute Liver Failure: Decision is to be Dynamic. Indian J Crit Care Med 2019; 23:574-581. [PMID: 31988548 PMCID: PMC6970204 DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23294] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and aims Acute liver failure (ALF) is a rare disease entity with a high mortality. Management is dependent on accurate prognostication. Materials and methods One hundred consecutive patients presenting with ALF were prospectively evaluated. The King's college criteria (KCC), ALF early dynamic model (ALFED), sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score, and acute physiology and health evaluation II (APACHE II) scores were compared to predict mortality. Results There were significant differences in means of all the scores between survivors and nonsurvivors. The SOFA 48 hours had the highest area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) (0.857) closely followed by the ALFED score (0.844). The optimal cutoff for the SOFA score at 48 hours to predict subsequent survival outcome is ≥10 and for the ALFED score is ≥5. Sequential organ failure assessment 48 hours had a good sensitivity of 87%, and the ALFED score showed a good specificity of 84%. The decision curve analysis showed that between a threshold probability of 0.13 and 0.6, use of the SOFA score provided the maximum net benefit and at threshold probabilities of >0.6, the use of ALFED score provided the maximum clinical benefit. Conclusion Dynamic scoring results in better prognostication in ALF. The SOFA 48 hours and ALFED score have good prognostication value in nonacetaminophen-induced liver failure. How to cite this article Saluja V, Sharma A, Pasupuleti SSR, Mitra LG, Kumar G, Agarwal PM. Comparison of Prognostic Models in Acute Liver Failure: Decision is to be Dynamic. Indian J Crit Care Med 2019;23(12):574–581.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vandana Saluja
- Department of Anesthesia and Critical Care, Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Anamika Sharma
- Department of Anesthesia and Critical Care, Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Samba Sr Pasupuleti
- Department of Statistics, Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Lalita G Mitra
- Department of Anesthesia and Critical Care, Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Guresh Kumar
- Department of Research, Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Prashant M Agarwal
- Department of Anesthesia and Critical Care, Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, New Delhi, India
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Aluvaala J, Collins GS, Maina M, Berkley JA, English M. A systematic review of neonatal treatment intensity scores and their potential application in low-resource setting hospitals for predicting mortality, morbidity and estimating resource use. Syst Rev 2017; 6:248. [PMID: 29212522 PMCID: PMC5719732 DOI: 10.1186/s13643-017-0649-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2017] [Accepted: 11/28/2017] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Treatment intensity scores can predict mortality and estimate resource use. They may therefore be of interest for essential neonatal care in low resource settings where neonatal mortality remains high. We sought to systematically review neonatal treatment intensity scores to (1) assess the level of evidence on predictive performance in predicting clinical outcomes and estimating resource utilisation and (2) assess the applicability of the identified models to decision making for neonatal care in low resource settings. METHODS We conducted a systematic search of PubMed, EMBASE (OVID), CINAHL, Global Health Library (Global index, WHO) and Google Scholar to identify studies published up until 21 December 2016. Included were all articles that used treatments as predictors in neonatal models. Individual studies were appraised using the CHecklist for critical Appraisal and data extraction for systematic Reviews of prediction Modelling Studies (CHARMS). In addition, Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) was used as a guiding framework to assess certainty in the evidence for predicting outcomes across studies. RESULTS Three thousand two hundred forty-nine articles were screened, of which ten articles were included in the review. All of the studies were conducted in neonatal intensive care units with sample sizes ranging from 22 to 9978, with a median of 163. Two articles reported model development, while eight reported external application of existing models to new populations. Meta-analysis was not possible due heterogeneity in the conduct and reporting of the identified studies. Discrimination as assessed by area under receiver operating characteristic curve was reported for in-hospital mortality, median 0.84 (range 0.75-0.96, three studies), early adverse outcome and late adverse outcome (0.78 and 0.59, respectively, one study). CONCLUSION Existing neonatal treatment intensity models show promise in predicting mortality and morbidity. There is however low certainty in the evidence on their performance in essential neonatal care in low resource settings as all studies had methodological limitations and were conducted in intensive care. The approach may however be developed further for low resource settings like Kenya because treatment data may be easier to obtain compared to measures of physiological status. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION PROSPERO CRD42016034205.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jalemba Aluvaala
- KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programme, P.O Box 43640 – 00100, Nairobi, Kenya
- Department of Paediatrics and Child Health, College of Health Sciences, University of Nairobi, Kenyatta National Hospital, P. O. Box 19676-00202, Nairobi, Kenya
- Centre for Tropical Medicine and Global Health, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX3 7FZ UK
| | - Gary S. Collins
- Centre for Statistics in Medicine, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, Botnar Research Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX3 7LD UK
| | - Michuki Maina
- KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programme, P.O Box 43640 – 00100, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - James A. Berkley
- KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programme, P.O Box 43640 – 00100, Nairobi, Kenya
- Centre for Tropical Medicine and Global Health, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX3 7FZ UK
- The Childhood Acute Illness & Nutrition (CHAIN) Network, P.O Box 43640 – 00100, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Mike English
- KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programme, P.O Box 43640 – 00100, Nairobi, Kenya
- Centre for Tropical Medicine and Global Health, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX3 7FZ UK
| |
Collapse
|