Regiroli G, Loi B, Pezza L, Sartorius V, Foti A, Barra PF, Centorrino R, Di Nardo M, De Luca D. Continuous Venovenous Hemofiltration Performed by Neonatologists With Cardio-Renal Pediatric Dialysis Emergency Machine to Treat Fluid Overload During Multiple Organ Dysfunction Syndrome: A Case Series.
Pediatr Crit Care Med 2023;
24:e196-e201. [PMID:
36728157 DOI:
10.1097/pcc.0000000000003177]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES
A new device is available for neonates needing extracorporeal renal replacement therapy. We reviewed the use of this device (in continuous venovenous hemofiltration [CVVH] mode) in term or preterm neonates affected by multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS) with fluid overload.
DESIGN
Case series.
SETTING
Academic specialized referral neonatal ICU (NICU) with expertise on advanced life support and monitoring.
PATIENTS
Neonates with MODS and fluid overload despite conventional treatments and receiving at least one CVVH session.
INTERVENTION
CVVH with the Cardio-Renal Pediatric Dialysis Emergency Machine.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS
Ten (three preterm) neonates were treated using 18 consecutive CVVH sessions. All patients were in life-threatening conditions and successfully completed the CVVH treatments, which almost always lasted 24 hr/session, without major side effects. Three neonates survived and were successfully discharged from hospital with normal follow-up. CVVH reduced fluid overload (before versus after represented as a weight percentage: 23.5% [12-34%] vs 14.6% [8.2-24.1%]; p = 0.006) and lactate (before versus after: 4.6 [2.9-12.1] vs 2.9 mmol/L [2.3-5.5 mmol/L]; p = 0.001). CVVH also improved the Pa o2 to Fio2 (before vs after: 188 mm Hg [118-253 mm Hg] vs 240 mm Hg [161-309 mm Hg]; p = 0.003) and oxygenation index (before vs after: 5.9 [3.8-14.6] vs 4 [2.9-11]; p = 0.002). The average cost of CVVH in these patients was minor (≈3%) in comparison with the median total cost of NICU care per patient.
CONCLUSIONS
We have provided CVVH to critically ill term and preterm neonates with MODS. CVVH improved fluid overload and oxygenation. The cost of CVVH was minimal compared with the overall cost of neonatal intensive care.
Collapse