Combining psychopharmacotherapy and psychotherapy is not associated with better treatment outcome in major depressive disorder - evidence from the European Group for the Study of Resistant Depression

The clinical perspective on late-onset depression in European real-world treatment settings

The clinical phenotype of the so-called late-onset depression (LOD) affecting up to 30% of older adults and yielding heterogeneous manifestations concerning symptoms, severity and course has not been fully elucidated yet. This European, cross-sectional, non-interventional, naturalistic multicenter study systematically investigated socio-demographic and clinical correlates of early-onset depression (EOD) and LOD (age of onset ≥ 50 years) in 1410 adult in- and outpatients of both sexes receiving adequate psychopharmacotherapy. In a total of 1329 patients (94.3%) with known age of disease onset, LOD was identified in 23.2% and was associated with unemployment, an ongoing relationship, single major depressive episodes, lower current suicidal risk and higher occurrence of comorbid hypertension. In contrast, EOD was related to higher rates of comorbid migraine and additional psychotherapy. Although the applied study design does not allow to draw any causal conclusions, the present results reflect broad clinical settings and emphasize easily obtainable features which might be characteristic for EOD and LOD. A thoughtful consideration of age of onset might, hence, contribute to optimized diagnostic and therapeutic processes in terms of the globally intended precision medicine, ideally enabling early and adequate treatment allocations and implementation of respective prevention programs.

A Retrospective Case-Control Study on the Differences in the Effectiveness of Theta-Burst Stimulation Therapy for Depression with and without Antidepressant Medication

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) therapy has few side effects and comparable therapeutic effects to antidepressant treatment, but few studies have introduced TMS therapy as an initial treatment for MDD. The objective of this study was to retrospectively compare the clinical outcomes between 50 MDD patients without antidepressants (i.e., TMS monotherapy) and 50 MDD patients with antidepressants plus TMS therapy, matched for age, sex, and depression severity. The presence or absence of antidepressant therapy in first-line treatment was determined via a detailed interview by psychiatrists. The study design was a retrospective observational case-control study using the TMS registry data. The key inclusion criteria were adult patients who met the diagnosis of MDD and received 20-30 sessions of intermittent theta-burst stimulation (iTBS) therapy to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC). In this study, the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) was used as the primary outcome measure. No significant group differences existed in the baseline MADRS total score between the unmedicated and medicated patient groups. Following TMS therapy, no significant group differences in response rate, remission rate, or relative total score change in the MADRS were observed. The main limitations were the retrospective design and the use of registry data as a source. Our findings suggest that TMS monotherapy may be as effective as TMS add-on therapy to antidepressants when used as the first-line therapy for MDD, but randomized controlled trials are needed.

Patterns and predictors of antidepressant prescribing among adults with cancer and depression in ambulatory care settings in the United States

OBJECTIVE

Despite depression being a common comorbidity among adults with cancer, limited literature is available regarding pharmacologic depression treatment patterns and predictors in this population. This study aims to examine patterns and predictors of antidepressant prescribing among adults with cancer and depression in ambulatory care settings in the United States (US).

METHODS

This retrospective, cross-sectional study utilized data collected from the 2014 to 2015 National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NAMCS). The study sample consisted of adults (age ≥ 18 years) with cancer and depression (unweighted N = 539; weighted N = 11,361,000). A multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to adjust for individual-level factors to identify predictors of antidepressant prescribing.

RESULTS

Most patients were adults aged ≥ 65 years, female, and non-Hispanic whites. Thirty-seven percent of the study sample received antidepressant treatment. Multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed that race/ethnicity, physician specialty, and number of medications were significantly associated with receiving antidepressant(s). For example, non-Hispanic whites were two-and-half times more likely to receive an antidepressant [OR 2.43, 95% confidence interval 1.13-5.23] compared to other race/ethnic groups. Every unit increase in the number of prescribed medications increased the likelihood of receiving an antidepressant by 6% (OR 1.06, 95% CI: 1.01-1.11).

CONCLUSION

Among adults with a comorbid cancer and depression diagnosis and a recorded U.S. ambulatory care visit in 2014-2015, 37% received antidepressant treatment. This suggests most patients with cancer and depression do not receive pharmacologic treatment for depression. Future studies are needed to investigate the impact of antidepressant treatment on health outcomes in this patient population.

Merazin hydrate produces rapid antidepressant effects by activating CaMKII to promote neuronal activities and proliferation in hippocampus

In our previous studies, we demonstrated that merazin hydrate (MH) had rapid antidepressant effects, but the deep mechanism needed to be further investigated. In this study, we used depressive-like model, behavioral tests, molecular biology and pharmacological interventions to reveal the underlying mechanisms of MH's rapid antidepressants. We found that a single administration of MH was able to produce rapid antidepressant effects in chronic unpredictable mild stress (CUMS) exposed mice at 1 day later, similar to ketamine. Moreover, MH could not only significantly up-regulated the expressions of cFOS, but also obviously increased the number of Ki67 positive cells in hippocampal dentate gyrus (DG). Furthermore, we also found that the phosphorylated expression of calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II (CaMKII) was significantly reduced by CUMS in hippocampus, which was also reversed by MH. In addition, pharmacological inhibition of CaMKII by using KN-93 (a CaMKII antagonist) blocked the MH's up-regulation of cFOS and Ki67 in hippocampal DG. To sum up, this study demonstrated that MH produced rapid antidepressant effects by activating CaMKII to promote neuronal activities and proliferation in hippocampus.

Overcoming the myths of esketamine administration: different and not difficult

Intranasal esketamine for treatment-resistant depression has been introduced and approved by the FDA and EMA in 2019 and 2020, respectively. Since then, the administration practices were found different among countries. Major depression has a high impact on many humans lives worldwide and more than a third of treated people are not responding after several treatment attempts. Additional administration with esketamine closed this gap for more than the half of these non-responders. Guidelines for the treatment of major depression recommend starting with add-on esketamine after 2-4 serious attempts of treatment with standard antidepressants (SSRI/SNRI) irrespective of augmentation with others, e.g., second generation antipsychotics or lithium. Thus, intranasal esketamine became an important role in the evidence-based treatment of major depression. The authors review and critically evaluated published articles focusing on preparation, management and observation of intranasal esketamine treatment. There exists a clear recommendation for administrating intranasal esketamine in a medical environment, not limited to a clinical setting for selecting the dose, monitoring the improvements and managing adverse events. The administration of intranasal esketamine is considered as safe during the application itself and long-lasting or severe adverse events during long-term treatment are very rare. Since this is a new approach for treatment application psychiatrists face new different but not difficult treatment procedures compared to prescribing only a medication.

Routine treatment pathways in a cohort of patients with major depression and suicidality in Italy: the ARIANNA observational study

BACKGROUND

Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) with suicidal ideation, intent, or behavior is a psychiatric emergency with controversial care management. Our study describes the comprehensive treatment pathways of this population in Italian routine clinical practice.

METHODS

ARIANNA [NCT04463108] is an observational prospective and retrospective cohort study involving both primary data collection and secondary data extract. A total of 137 adult MDD patients with suicidality were enrolled from 24 Italian care sites and followed for 90 days. Other than the description of treatment patterns, the impact of treatment on depressive symptoms and suicidality, the burden on the patient's and caregiver's quality of life, healthcare resource utilization and costs were described.

RESULTS

Of the 133 eligible patients, 68.4% were female, and the median age was 47. Approximately half of the study population had a current severe major depressive episode. Treatment strategies at the time of active suicidal ideation with intent definition/confirmation (t0) were heterogeneous, increasing in complexity during observation. According to the MADRS, patients with remission at t0+1 day were 2.6%, with the mean total score decreasing from 37.2 at t0 to 32.3.

LIMITATIONS

The study sites were not randomly selected.

CONCLUSIONS

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first cohort study that prospectively describes the characteristics of patients with MDD and suicide risk in Italy, and how they are treated in clinical practice. The study confirms this is a difficult-to-treat population. In addition, a lack of rapid, effective treatment for reducing depressive symptoms and suicidality is observed.

Treatment-resistant depression: definition, prevalence, detection, management, and investigational interventions

Treatment-resistant depression (TRD) is common and associated with multiple serious public health implications. A consensus definition of TRD with demonstrated predictive utility in terms of clinical decision-making and health outcomes does not currently exist. Instead, a plethora of definitions have been proposed, which vary significantly in their conceptual framework. The absence of a consensus definition hampers precise estimates of the prevalence of TRD, and also belies efforts to identify risk factors, prevention opportunities, and effective interventions. In addition, it results in heterogeneity in clinical practice decision-making, adversely affecting quality of care. The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the European Medicines Agency (EMA) have adopted the most used definition of TRD (i.e., inadequate response to a minimum of two antidepressants despite adequacy of the treatment trial and adherence to treatment). It is currently estimated that at least 30% of persons with depression meet this definition. A significant percentage of persons with TRD are actually pseudo-resistant (e.g., due to inadequacy of treatment trials or non-adherence to treatment). Although multiple sociodemographic, clinical, treatment and contextual factors are known to negatively moderate response in persons with depression, very few factors are regarded as predictive of non-response across multiple modalities of treatment. Intravenous ketamine and intranasal esketamine (co-administered with an antidepressant) are established as efficacious in the management of TRD. Some second-generation antipsychotics (e.g., aripiprazole, brexpiprazole, cariprazine, quetiapine XR) are proven effective as adjunctive treatments to antidepressants in partial responders, but only the olanzapine-fluoxetine combination has been studied in FDA-defined TRD. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is established as effective and FDA-approved for individuals with TRD, with accelerated theta-burst TMS also recently showing efficacy. Electroconvulsive therapy is regarded as an effective acute and maintenance intervention in TRD, with preliminary evidence suggesting non-inferiority to acute intravenous ketamine. Evidence for extending antidepressant trial, medication switching and combining antidepressants is mixed. Manual-based psychotherapies are not established as efficacious on their own in TRD, but offer significant symptomatic relief when added to conventional antidepressants. Digital therapeutics are under study and represent a potential future clinical vista in this population.

Real-world characteristics of European patients receiving SNRIs as first-line treatment for major depressive disorder

BACKGROUND

Serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs) are among the most frequently prescribed antidepressants (ADs) for major depressive disorder (MDD), with an increasing trend in the last decade. Given the relative dearth of information regarding rationales for their preferred use as first-line ADs in the broad clinical routine, the present study systematically investigated real-world characteristics of MDD patients prescribed either SNRIs or other AD substances across different countries and treatment settings.

METHODS

In the present secondary analyses based on a large European, multi-site, naturalistic and cross-sectional investigation with a retrospective assessment of treatment outcome, we firstly defined the proportion of MDD patients receiving SNRIs as first-line AD psychopharmacotherapy and secondly compared their sociodemographic and clinical characteristics to those patients prescribed alternative first-line ADs during their current major depressive episode (MDE).

RESULTS

Within the total sample of 1410 MDD patients, 336 (23.8 %) received first-line SNRIs. Compared to other ADs, SNRIs were significantly associated with inpatient care, suicidality and treatment resistance during the current MDE, and a longer lifetime duration of psychiatric hospitalizations. Moreover, greater severity of depressive symptoms at study entry, higher daily doses of the administered ADs, as well as more frequent prescriptions of psychopharmacotherapeutic add-on strategies in general and antipsychotic augmentation in particular, were significantly related to first-line SNRIs.

CONCLUSIONS

Considering the limitations of a cross-sectional and retrospective study design, our data point towards a preferred use of first-line SNRIs in a generally more severely ill MDD patients, although they did not lead to superior treatment outcomes compared to alternative ADs.

The sociodemographic and clinical profile of patients with major depressive disorder receiving SSRIs as first-line antidepressant treatment in European countries

INTRODUCTION

Due to favorable antidepressant (AD) efficacy and tolerability, selective-serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) are consistently recommended as substances of first choice for the treatment of major depressive disorder (MDD) in international guidelines. However, little is known about the real-world clinical correlates of patients primarily prescribed SSRIs in contrast to those receiving alternative first-line ADs.

METHODS

These secondary analyses are based on a naturalistic, multinational cross-sectional study conducted by the European Group for the Study of Resistant Depression at ten research sites. We compared the socio-demographic and clinical characteristics of 1410 patients with primary MDD, who were either prescribed SSRIs or alternative substances as first-line AD treatment, using chi-squared tests, analyses of covariance, and logistic regression analyses.

RESULTS

SSRIs were prescribed in 52.1% of MDD patients who showed lower odds for unemployment, current severity of depressive symptoms, melancholic features, suicidality, as well as current inpatient treatment compared to patients receiving alternative first-line ADs. Furthermore, patients prescribed SSRIs less likely received add-on therapies including AD combination and augmentation with antipsychotics, and exhibited a trend towards higher response rates.

CONCLUSION

A more favorable socio-demographic and clinical profile associated with SSRIs in contrast to alternative first-line ADs may have guided European psychiatrists' treatment choice for SSRIs, rather than any relevant pharmacological differences in mechanisms of action of the investigated ADs. Our results must be cautiously interpreted in light of predictable biases resulting from the open treatment selection, the possible allocation of less severely ill patients to SSRIs as well as the cross-sectional study design that does not allow to ascertain any causal conclusions.