Effectiveness of an Internet-based preparation for psychosomatic treatment: Results of a controlled observational study

Evidence-Based Evaluation of eHealth Interventions: Systematic Literature Review

Background

Until now, the use of technology in health care was driven mostly by the assumptions about the benefits of electronic health (eHealth) rather than its evidence. It is noticeable that the magnitude of evidence of effectiveness and efficiency of eHealth is not proportionate to the number of interventions that are regularly conducted. Reliable evidence generated through comprehensive evaluation of eHealth interventions may accelerate the growth of eHealth for long-term successful implementation and help to experience eHealth benefits in an enhanced way.

Objective

This study aimed to understand how the evidence of effectiveness and efficiency of eHealth can be generated through evaluation. Hence, we aim to discern (1) how evaluation is conducted in distinct eHealth intervention phases, (2) the aspects of effectiveness and efficiency that are typically evaluated during eHealth interventions, and (3) how eHealth interventions are evaluated in practice.

Methods

A systematic literature review was conducted to explore the evaluation methods for eHealth interventions. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed. We searched Google Scholar and Scopus for the published papers that addressed the evaluation of eHealth or described an eHealth intervention study. A qualitative analysis of the selected papers was conducted in several steps.

Results

We intended to see how the process of evaluation unfolds in distinct phases of an eHealth intervention. We revealed that in practice and in several conceptual papers, evaluation is performed at the end of the intervention. There are some studies that discuss the importance of conducting evaluation throughout the intervention; however, in practice, we found no case study that followed this. For our second research question, we discovered aspects of efficiency and effectiveness that are proposed to be assessed during interventions. The aspects that were recurrent in the conceptual papers include clinical, human and social, organizational, technological, cost, ethical and legal, and transferability. However, the case studies reviewed only evaluate the clinical and human and social aspects. At the end of the paper, we discussed a novel approach to look into the evaluation. Our intention was to stir up a discussion around this approach with the hope that it might be able to gather evidence in a comprehensive and credible way.

Conclusions

The importance of evidence in eHealth has not been discussed as rigorously as have the diverse evaluation approaches and evaluation frameworks. Further research directed toward evidence-based evaluation can not only improve the quality of intervention studies but also facilitate successful long-term implementation of eHealth in general. We conclude that the development of more robust and comprehensive evaluation of eHealth studies or an improved validation of evaluation methods could ease the transferability of results among similar studies. Thus, the resources can be used for supplementary research in eHealth.

Internetbasierte Therapie in der Versorgung von Patienten mit depressiven Störungen: Ein Überblick

Zusammenfassung. Internet- und mobilbasierten Interventionen wird großes Potenzial in der Behandlung von Menschen mit depressiver Symptomatik zugeschrieben. Diese Einschätzung hat sich in den letzten Jahren vor dem Hintergrund mehrerer Programmentwicklungen und einer Vielzahl von Studien zur Wirksamkeitsprüfung der zumeist auf der kognitiven Verhaltenstherapie basierten Angebote etabliert. Ziel der vorliegenden Übersichtsarbeit ist es, zu prüfen, inwieweit sich aus der empirischen Befundlage wissenschaftlich fundierte Empfehlungen für die Versorgungsbereiche Prävention, Primärversorgung, ambulante Psychotherapie, fachärztliche Versorgung sowie die stationäre Behandlung ableiten lassen. Hierfür werden die Ergebnisse ausgewählter Studien, die in den genannten Versorgungsbereichen angesiedelt sind und die Erhebung der Diagnose depressive Störung auf ein Expertenurteil stützen, kritisch bewertet. In der Schlussfolgerung ermöglicht die gegenwärtige Studienlage keine eindeutige Empfehlung zum Einsatz von internetbasierten Behandlungsprogrammen in den genannten Versorgungsbereichen.

[Internet- and mobile-based approaches : Psycho-social diagnostics and treatment in medical rehabilitation]

Technology-based approaches for psychosocial diagnostics and interventions provide an attractive opportunity to optimize medical rehabilitation. Based on an Internet- and mobile-based assessment of existing functional health impairments, appropriate planning, implementation of corresponding courses of action as well as outcome assessment can take place. This can be implemented in the form of Internet- and mobile-based interventions (IMI).The present article provides an overview of the basic knowledge of IMI and their evidence base both in general and in particular for their use in medical rehabilitation. Important aspects of internet and mobile-based psycho-social diagnostics are discussed subsequently. Finally, an outlook for the use of Internet- and mobile-based diagnostics and interventions in medical rehabilitation is given.

Evaluation of a video-based Internet intervention as preparation for inpatient psychosomatic rehabilitation: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Background

Patients’ treatment expectations are a key factor in psychotherapy. Several studies have linked higher expectations to better treatment success. Therefore, we want to evaluate the impact of a targeted video-based intervention on patients’ expectations and the treatment success of inpatient rehabilitation.

Methods/design

All patients who will be referred to inpatient psychosomatic rehabilitation in three clinics will receive a study flyer with information about how to log in to the study platform together with the usual clinic information leaflet. Patients will receive the study information and informed consent upon login and will be randomized into the intervention or the control group. The intervention group (n = 394) will get access to our virtual online clinic, containing several videos about inpatient rehabilitation, until their admission to inpatient rehabilitation. The control group (n = 394) will receive no special treatment preparation. Questionnaires will be given at study inclusion (T0), two weeks before admission to (T1), and at the end of (T2) inpatient rehabilitation. The primary outcome is the outcome expectancy measured with the Credibility Expectancy Questionnaire at T1. Secondary outcomes include treatment motivation, mental health, work ability, depression, anxiety, and satisfaction with and usage of the Internet platform.

Discussion

We expect the intervention group to benefit from the additional preparation concerning their outcome expectancy. If successful, this approach could be used in the future to enhance the efficacy of inpatient rehabilitation.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02532881. Registered on 25 August 2015.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13063-016-1417-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.