Health in medicine: The lost graal

Impact of homeostatic body hydration status, evaluated by hemodynamic measures, on different pain sensitization paths to a chronic pain syndrome

Contrasting findings on the mechanisms of chronic pain and hypertension development render the current conventional evidence of a negative relationship between blood pressure (BP) and pain severity insufficient for developing personalized treatments. In this interdisciplinary study, patients with fibromyalgia (FM) exhibiting clinically normal or elevated BP, alongside healthy participants were assessed. Different pain sensitization responses were evaluated using a dynamic 'slowly repeated evoked pain' (SREP) measure, as well as static pain pressure threshold and tolerance measures. Cardiovascular responses to clino-orthostatic (lying-standing) challenges were also examined as acute re- and de-hydration events, challenging cardiovascular and cerebrovascular homeostasis. These challenges involve compensating effects from various cardiac preload or afterload mechanisms associated with different homeostatic body hydration statuses. Additionally, hair cortisol concentration was considered as a factor with an impact on chronic hydration statuses. Pain windup (SREP) and lower pain threshold in FM patients were found to be related to BP rise during clinostatic (lying) rehydration or orthostatic (standing) dehydration events, respectively. These events were determined by acute systemic vasoconstriction (i.e., cardiac afterload response) overcompensating for clinostatic or orthostatic cardiac preload under-responses (low cardiac output or stroke volume). Lower pain tolerance was associated with tonic blood pressure reduction, determined by permanent hypovolemia (low stroke volume) decompensated by permanent systemic vasodilation. In conclusion, the body hydration status profiles assessed by (re)activity of systemic vascular resistance and effective blood volume-related measures can help predict the risk and intensity of different pain sensitization components in chronic pain syndrome, facilitating a more personalized management approach.

Impact of antihypertensive treatment on resiliency to clinical pain

OBJECTIVES

Although progress has been made in the regulation of hypertension over the past decades, the USA and some other countries have faced a significant rise in incidence of chronic pain management cases during the same period. Studies of the relationship between pain and blood pressure (BP) regulations propose that these two processes may be interconnected. Studies of effects of antihypertensive treatment on pain in general and its chronification have never been reviewed.

METHODS

A narrative review of respective studies with analysis of credibility of the findings was conducted.

RESULTS

Some studies have suggested that aggressive reduction of high BP may contribute to a return in pain symptoms and may require more aggressive, long-term pain management. Other studies propose that long-term antihypertensive medication could also increase the risk for new cases of chronic pain. Pain initiates a central neuroplastic resetting of the baroreceptor activation accounting for sustained increase of BP with an adaptive 'pain-killing' or maladaptive 'pain-complication' effect associated with pain chronification, and these mechanisms may be moderated by antihypertensive medications. However, different antihypertensive drugs and nondrug treatments may diversely affect pain mechanisms at different stages of treatments.

CONCLUSION

Uncontrollable reduction of high BP in some patients with hypertension could increase the risk for chronic pain incidence and its severity. Practical recommendations in BP control should be reconsidered to take into account patients' chronic pain. Further research is needed of moderation effects of different antihypertensive manipulations on pain to improve pain management in these patients.