Potentially traumatic events, social support and burden of persistent somatic symptoms: A longitudinal study

The association between patterns of exposure to adverse life events and the risk of chronic kidney disease: a prospective cohort study of 140,997 individuals

Exposure to adverse life events is linked to somatic disorders. The study aims to evaluate the association between adverse events at varying life stages and the risk of chronic kidney disease (CKD), a condition affecting about 10% population worldwide. This prospective cohort study included 140,997 participants from the UK Biobank. Using survey items related to childhood maltreatment, adulthood adversity and catastrophic trauma, we performed latent class analysis to summarize five distinct patterns of exposure to adverse life events, namely "low-level exposure", "childhood exposure", "adulthood exposure", "sexual abuse" and "child-to-adulthood exposure". We used Cox proportional hazard regression to evaluate the association of patterns of exposure to adverse life events with CKD, regression-based mediation analysis to decompose the total effect, and gene-environment-wide interaction study (GEWIS) to identify interactions between genetic loci and adverse life events. During a median follow-up of 5.98 years, 2734 cases of incident CKD were identified. Compared with the "low-level exposure" pattern, "child-to-adulthood exposure" was associated with increased risk of CKD (hazard ratio 1.37, 95% CI 1.14 to 1.65). BMI, smoking and hypertension mediated 11.45%, 9.79%, and 4.50% of this total effect, respectively. Other patterns did not show significant results. GEWIS and subsequent analyses indicated that the magnitude of the association between adverse life events and CKD differed according to genetic polymorphisms, and identified potential underlying pathways (e.g., interleukin 1 receptor activity). These findings underscore the importance of incorporating an individual's psychological encounters and genetic profiles into the precision prevention of CKD.

Persistent physical symptoms: definition, genesis, and management

Persistent physical symptoms (synonymous with persistent somatic symptoms) is an umbrella term for distressing somatic complaints that last several months or more, regardless of their cause. These symptoms are associated with substantial disability and represent a major burden for patients, health-care professionals, and society. Persistent physical symptoms can follow infections, injuries, medical diseases, stressful life events, or arise de novo. As symptoms persist, their link to clearly identifiable pathophysiology often weakens, making diagnosis and treatment challenging. Multiple biological and psychosocial risk factors and mechanisms contribute to the persistence of somatic symptoms, including persistent inflammation; epigenetic profiles; immune, metabolic and microbiome dysregulation; early adverse life experiences; depression; illness-related anxiety; dysfunctional symptom expectations; symptom focusing; symptom learning; and avoidance behaviours, with many factors being common across symptoms and diagnoses. Basic care consists of addressing underlying pathophysiology and using person-centred communication techniques with validation, appropriate reassurance, and biopsychosocial explanation. If basic care is insufficient, targeted psychological and pharmacological interventions can be beneficial. A better understanding of the multifactorial persistence of somatic symptoms should lead to more specific, personalised, and mechanism-based treatment, and a reduction in the stigma patients commonly face.

The burden of persistent symptom diagnoses in primary care patients: a cross-sectional study

INTRODUCTION

The burden of symptoms is a subjective experience of distress. Little is known on the burden of feeling unwell in patients with persistent symptom diagnoses. The aim of this study was to assess the burden in primary care patients with persistent symptom diagnoses compared to other primary care patients.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study was performed in which an online survey was sent to random samples of 889 patients with persistent symptom diagnoses (>1 year) and 443 other primary care patients after a transactional identification in a Dutch primary care data registry. Validated questionnaires were used to assess the severity of symptoms (PHQ-15), Symptom Intensity and Symptom Interference questionnaires, depression (PHQ-9), anxiety (GAD-7), quality of life (SF-12 and EQ-5D-5L)) and social functioning (SPF-ILs).

RESULTS

Overall, 243 patients completed the survey: 178 (73.3%) patients in the persistent symptom diagnoses group and 65 (26.7%) patients in the control group. In the persistent group, 65 (36.5%) patients did not have persistent symptom(s) anymore according to the survey response. Patients who still had persistent symptom diagnoses (n = 113, 63.5%) reported significantly more severe somatic symptoms (mean difference = 3.6, [95% CI: 0.24, 4.41]), depression (mean difference = 3.0 [95% CI: 1.24, 3.61]) and anxiety (mean difference = 2.3 [95% CI: 0.28, 3.10]) and significantly lower physical functioning (mean difference = - 6.8 [95% CI: -8.96, -3.92]).

CONCLUSION

Patients with persistent symptom diagnoses suffer from high levels of symptoms burden. The burden in patient with persistent symptoms should not be underestimated as awareness of this burden may enhance person-centered care.

Neuroticism and adverse life events are important determinants in functional somatic disorders: the DanFunD study

Several psychological factors have been proposed to be associated with functional somatic disorders (FSD). However, large population-based studies investigating the importance of both personality and adverse life events (ALE) are sparse. This study aimed to investigate the association between FSD and neuroticism and the accumulated number of ALE, respectively. This cross-sectional study included a random sample of the adult Danish population (N = 7493). FSD were established by means of self-reported questionnaires and diagnostic interviews. Neuroticism was measured with the Danish version of the short-form NEO Personality Inventory. ALE were measured with the Danish version of the Cumulative Lifetime Adversity Measure. Strong positive associations were found between neuroticism and FSD, and ALE and questionnaire-based FSD. For interview-based FSD, strong positive associations were found for FSD, multi-organ type, and for the subtype of the general symptoms. The level of self-efficacy did not modify these associations, and no moderating effect of neuroticism and ALE in combination on the probability of having FSD was found. FSD were strongly associated with both neuroticism and the accumulated number of ALE, and these associations were not modified by self-efficacy. In combination, neuroticism and ALE did not have a moderating effect on the probability of having FSD.