1
|
Malek MM, Behr CA, Aldrink JH, Dasgupta R, Heaton TE, Gehred A, Lautz TB, Baertschiger RM, Christison-Lagay ER, Tracy ET, Rhee DS, Rodeberg D, Austin MT, Ehrlich PF. Minimally invasive surgery for pediatric renal tumors: A systematic review by the APSA Cancer Committee. J Pediatr Surg 2020; 55:2251-2259. [PMID: 32386972 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2020.03.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2019] [Revised: 02/20/2020] [Accepted: 03/23/2020] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
UNLABELLED Minimally invasive nephrectomy is performed routinely for adult renal tumors and for many benign pediatric conditions. Although open radical nephroureterectomy remains the standard of care for Wilms tumor and most pediatric renal malignancies, there are an increasing number of reports of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for those operations as well. The APSA Cancer Committee performed a systematic review to better understand the risks and benefits of MIS in pediatric patients with renal tumors. METHODS The search focused on MIS for renal tumors in children and followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) checklist. The initial database search identified 491 published articles, and after progressive review of abstracts and full-length articles, 19 were included in this review. RESULTS There were two direct comparison studies where open surgery and MIS were compared. The remaining studies reported only on minimally invasive nephrectomy. Across all studies, there were a total of 151 patients, 126 of which had Wilms tumor and 10 patients had RCC. 104 patients had MIS, with 47 patients having open surgery. In the two studies in which open surgery and MIS were directly compared, more lymph nodes were harvested during open surgery (median = 2 (MIS) vs 5 (open); mean = 2.47 (MIS) vs 3.8 (open)). Many noncomparison studies reported the harvest of 2 of fewer lymph nodes for Wilms tumor. Several MIS patients were also noted to have intraoperative spill or positive margins. Survival between groups was similar. CONCLUSIONS There is a lack of evidence to support MIS for pediatric renal tumors. This review demonstrates that lymph node harvest has been inadequate for MIS pediatric nephrectomy and there appears to be an increased risk for intraoperative spill. Survival data are similar between groups, but follow-up times were inconsistent and patient selection was clearly biased, with only small tumors being selected for MIS. TYPE OF STUDY Review article. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marcus M Malek
- Department of Surgery, Division of Pediatric Surgery, UPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA.
| | - Christopher A Behr
- Department of Surgery, Division of Pediatric Surgery, UPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Jennifer H Aldrink
- Department of Surgery, Division of Pediatric Surgery, Nationwide Children's Hospital, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH
| | - Roshni Dasgupta
- Division of Pediatric General and Thoracic Surgery, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH
| | - Todd E Heaton
- Department of Surgery, Division of Pediatric Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Alison Gehred
- Grant Morrow, III MD Medical Library, Nationwide Children's Hospital, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH
| | - Timothy B Lautz
- Ann & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL
| | | | - Emily R Christison-Lagay
- Division of Pediatric General and Thoracic Surgery, Yale-New Haven Children's Hospital, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
| | - Elisabeth T Tracy
- Department of Surgery, Division of Pediatric Surgery, Duke University Medical Center
| | - Daniel S Rhee
- Department of Surgery, Division of Pediatric Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - David Rodeberg
- Department of Surgery, Division of Pediatric Surgery, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC
| | - Mary T Austin
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Peter F Ehrlich
- Department of Pediatric Surgery, University of Michigan, C.S. Mott Children's Hospital, Ann Arbor, MI
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Alvarez O, Rodriguez MM, Jordan L, Sarnaik S. Renal medullary carcinoma and sickle cell trait: A systematic review. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2015; 62:1694-9. [PMID: 26053587 DOI: 10.1002/pbc.25592] [Citation(s) in RCA: 63] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2014] [Accepted: 04/03/2015] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Sickle cell trait (SCT) carries a small risk of renal medullary carcinoma (RMC). We conducted a systematic literature review and reported new four RMC cases (total N = 217). Eighty eight percent had SCT and 8% had sickle cell disease; 50% were children. Males had 2.4× risk than females. Isolated hematuria or in combination with abdominal or flank pain was the presenting sign in 66% cases. Tumor-related mortality was 95%. Four non-metastatic patients were long-term disease-free survivors. Although risk appears to be very low, individuals with SCT should be informed about the low risk of RMC with the hope of early diagnosis. Hematuria should prompt immediate investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ofelia Alvarez
- Division of Pediatric Hematology-Oncology, University of Miami, Miami, Florida
| | - Maria M Rodriguez
- Division of Pediatric Pathology, University of Miami, Miami, Florida
| | - Lanetta Jordan
- Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Miami, Miami, Florida
| | - Sharada Sarnaik
- Division of Pediatric Hematology-Oncology, Children's Hospital of Michigan, Detroit, Michigan
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Abstract
The use of laparoscopy has evolved over the last 30 years, particularly in the last decade, from merely extirpative or diagnostic procedures to intricate reconstructive procedures on the major genitourinary organs. The development of laparoscopy as a method of treating urological problems has progressed more slowly in children compared with adults; perhaps due to the availability of miniaturized technology, the steep learning curve and the high success of traditional open surgery. This article seeks to provide a comprehensive review of the evolution of laparoscopy from its inception to its present-day applications in the field of pediatric urology, including the current indications and results of various laparoscopic procedures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Regina D Norris
- Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, Pediatric Urology, 45th and Penn Avenue, 4th Floor Faculty Pavilion, Pittsburgh, PA 15201, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|