Ureteric stents in pyeloplasty: a help or a hindrance?

An advantageous practical modification in mini-laparoscopic pyeloplasty for prepubertal children: Extracorporeal ureteral spatulation, suturing and stenting - EUSSS technique

BACKGROUND

Ureteral spatulation, the first ureteral suture, and double-J stenting may be challenging and time-consuming in laparoscopic pyeloplasty, especially in small children. We aimed to present our comparative results of the extracorporeal ureteral spatulation, suturing, and stenting (EUSSS) technique in mini-laparoscopic pyeloplasty (MLP) and the conventional intracorporeal technique in prepubertal children.

METHODS

The data of 46 prepubertal pediatric patients (< 12 years) who underwent laparoscopic pyeloplasty by a single surgeon between January 2021 and October 2023 were retrospectively reviewed. The patients were divided into two groups: who underwent EUSSS-MLP (Group-1, n = 26) and who underwent conventional intracorporeal pyeloplasty (Group-2, n = 20).

RESULTS

The mean age of all patients was 5.3 years (4.8 ± 2.8 years in Group-1 and 6.0 ± 2.1 years in Group-2 p = 0.126). The mean duration of ureteral preparation plus double-J stenting was 5.7 ± 1.6 min in Group-1 and 19.2 ± 4.1 min in Group-2 (p < 0.0001). The mean duration of surgery was statistically significantly higher in Group-2 (p = 0.034). There was no significant difference in terms of postoperative complications (p = 0.482). Laparoscopic pyeloplasty was successful in 42 (91.3%) patients, with no statistically significant difference between the two groups (Group-1: 24 (92.3%), Group-2:18 (90%), p = 0.783).

CONCLUSION

Extracorporeal ureteral preparation and double-J stenting can be safely and effectively preferred in MLP for prepubertal children.

Minimally invasive pyeloplasty versus open pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction in infants: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

To compare the perioperative outcomes and success rates of minimally invasive pyeloplasty (MIP), including laparoscopic and robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty, with open pyeloplasty (OP) in infants.

Materials and Methods

In September 2022, a systematic search of PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library databases was undertaken. The systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted in accordance with PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines, with the study registered prospectively in the PROSPERO database (CRD42022359475).

Results

Eleven studies were included. Dichotomous and continuous variables were presented as odds ratios (OR) and standard mean differences (SMD), respectively, with their 95% confidence intervals (CI). Compared to OP, a longer operation time and shorter length of stay were associated with MIP (SMD: 0.96,95% CI: 0.30 to 1.62, p = 0.004, and SMD: -1.12, 95% CI: -1.82 to -0.43, p = 0.002, respectively). No significant differences were found between the MIP and OP in terms of overall postoperative complications (OR:0.84, 95% CI: 0.52 to 1.35, p = 0.47), minor complications (OR: 0.76, 95% CI: 0.40 to 1.42, p = 0.39), or major complications (OR: 1.10, 95% CI: 0.49 to 2.50, p = 0.81). In addition, a lower stent placement rate was related to MIP (OR: 0.09, 95% CI: 0.02 to 0.47, p = 0.004). There was no statistical difference for success rate between the MIP and OP (OR: 1.35, 95% CI: 0.59 to 3.07, p = 0.47). Finally, the results of subgroup analysis were consistent with the above.

Conclusions

Our meta-analysis demonstrates that MIP is a feasible and safe alternative to OP for infants, presenting comparable perioperative outcomes and similar success rates, albeit requiring longer operation times. However, it is essential to consider the limitations of our study, including the inclusion of studies with small sample sizes and the combination of both prospective and retrospective research designs.

Failure in Double-J stent inserting in laparoscopic pyeloplasty of ureteropelvic junction obstruction: the clinical features and outcomes

BACKGROUND

Double-J (DJ) stent placement is an important procedure during laparoscopic pyeloplasty (LP). Failing to insert the DJ stent may indicate the patient was also complicated with uretero-vesical junction obstruction (UVJO), and surgeons have to change to another alternative drainage method. In the present study, we analyzed the risk factors of failure of DJ stent placement during the LP and reviewed the clinical outcomes of these challenging pyeloplasties.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of patients with ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO) who underwent LP in our department from January 2016 to September 2020. For patients who developed a difficult process of inserting the DJ stent, the externalized uretero-pyelostomy (EUP) stent was indwelled. Patients were finally divided into two groups: DJ group and EUP group. The primary outcomes were recurrent UPJO, postoperative uretero-vesical junction obstruction (UVJO) and complications.

RESULTS

A total of 535 patients were included in the study, of which 37 patients (6.9%) failed to insert the DJ stent. Age was younger, and weight was lower (P < 0.05) in the EUP group. Within follow-up, recurrent UPJO occurred in ten (1.87%) patients, nine in the DJ group and one in the EUP group (P > 0.05). The incidence of postoperative UVJO in the EUP group was significantly higher than in the DJ group (10.8% vs. 0.2%, P < 0.01). 74 patients (13.8%) developed complications after surgery, 12 patients (32.4%) in the EUP group, significantly higher than that in the DJ group (32.4% vs. 12.4%, P < 0.01). Compared with the DJ group, the larger APD were observed in the EUP group at three months postoperatively (3.50 [3.02;4.58] vs. 2.20 [1.50;2.88], P < 0.05), but the difference vanished in further follow-up.

CONCLUSION

The failure of DJ stent placement tends to occur in patients with younger age, lower weight, and larger preoperative APD. Failure may not increase the recurrent UPJO rate, but may indicate a higher probability of postoperative UVJO and may develop more postoperative complications and slower recovery.

Our experience of operated pediatric ureteropelvic junction obstruction patients

AIMS

Ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO) may originate from extrinsic or intrinsic causes in children. The aim of this study is to present preoperative and postoperative data of our patients operated for UPJO.

METHODS

A total of 64 patients who underwent open pyeloplasty were investigated retrospectively. They were evaluated in terms of demographically, clinics, hydronephrosis, differential renal functions (DRFs), half-time tracer clearance (½TC), and histopathologic results. Patients' numerical results were stated as mean ± standard deviation (SD).

RESULTS

Male gender was more prevalent (n = 47, 73.4%) and mean age at surgery was 46.87 months. UPJO was located at the left side in 56.3% (n = 36), and at the right side in 39.1% (n = 25) of patients. It was bilateral in 4.7% (n = 3). Hydronephrosis was found antenatally in 68.8% (n = 44) of patients. The mean preoperative DRF was 49.7% (21-78%) and mean postoperative DRF was 49.2% (20-56%). Mean renal scintigraphic t1/2 was >20 min for all patients. The mean AP diameter was 21.58 mm (10-62 mm). Muscular hypertrophy was the most common pathological finding, mean length of excised segment was 10.26 mm (3-40 mm). Crossing vessel (CV) was detected in 17.18% (n = 11). The CV was statistically associated with increased age of operation, left side, and female gender. Statistically significant hydronephrosis was found in non-CV patients. Re-operation was required in seven patients (7.8%).

CONCLUSIONS

Intrinsic pathologies are more seen in the etiology of UPJO patients with antenatal diagnosis and this group needs operation at an earlier age. However, CV is found more commonly in patients who are diagnosed and operated at older ages.

Ureteral stent extraction strings in children: Stratifying the risk of post operative urinary tract infection

INTRODUCTION

Ureteral stents facilitate recovery and avoid external drains in pediatric ureteral reconstruction. Extraction strings avoid the need for a secondary cystoscopy and anesthetic. Due to concerns regarding febrile UTIs in children with extraction strings, we retrospectively assessed the relative risk of UTI in children with extraction strings.

OBJECTIVE

Our hypothesis was that stents with extraction strings do not increase the risk of UTI after pediatric ureteral reconstruction.

METHODS

Records of all children undergoing pyeloplasty and ureteroureterostomy (UU) from 2014 to 2021 were reviewed. The incidences of UTI, fever, and hospitalization were recorded.

RESULTS

245 patients mean age 6.4 years (163M:82F) underwent pyeloplasty (n = 221) or UU (n = 24). 42% (n = 103) received prophylaxis. Of these, 15% developed UTI versus 5% of those not receiving prophylaxis (p < 0.05). 42 females had prior history of UTI, compared to 20 males (p < 0.05). 49 patients had an extraction string. Stents with extraction strings were removed on average 0.6 months post-op while others underwent cystoscopic removal on average 1.26 months post-op (p < 0.05). 9 (18.4%) required hospitalization for febrile UTI while the stent with extraction string was in place, while only 13 (6.6%) of those without extraction string did (p < 0.02). Of the 9 children with a febrile UTI in the extraction string group, 6 had history of prior UTI (46.1%), compared to only 3 (8.3%) without a prior UTI (p < 0.05). With no prior UTI, there was no difference in UTI risk between those with (3, 8.3%) and without (8, 6.4%) extraction string (p = 0.71). Females with prior UTI and extraction string were more likely to develop UTI than those with prior UTI and no extraction string (p = 0.01). There were not enough males with history of UTI to analyze alone. There were 5 (10%) stent dislodgements in the extraction string group, 2 required further intervention with cystoscopy or percutaneous drainage.

DISCUSSION

Extraction strings provide the assurance of drainage while avoiding the need for a second general anesthetic procedure. There is not an increased risk of UTI with extraction string in those without prior history of UTI, but we no longer routinely leave extraction strings if there is history of UTI.

CONCLUSION

Children, particularly females, with prior history of UTI have a significantly increased risk of febrile UTIs associated with the use of extraction strings. Prophylaxis does not seem to reduce this risk. Patients with no prior UTI had no higher risk of UTI with extraction string use for pyeloplasty or UU.

Febrile urinary tract infection after Double-J stent removal is associated with restenosis after laparoscopic pyeloplasty: A propensity score matched analysis of 503 children

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the association between the febrile urinary tract infection (fUTI) after Double-J (DJ) stents removal and restenosis after laparoscopic pyeloplasty (LP).

STUDY DESIGN

We retrospectively reviewed the clinical data of patients who were treated with transperitoneal LP for ureteropelvic junction obstruction from 2016 to 2020. Patients were divided into two groups according to whether they developed fUTI after DJ stent removal within 48 h. The 1:3 Propensity Score Matched (PSM) method was used to balance confounding variables.

RESULTS

503 patients were included in the study. 28 (5.57%) patients developed fUTI after DJ stent removal. Compared with the non-fUTI group, age was younger, and weight was lower (P < 0.05) in the fUTI group. Restenosis occurred in 11 (2.2%) patients, of which six patients developed fUTI after DJ stent removal. The revision surgery rate in the fUTI group was significantly higher than in the non-fUTI group (21.4% vs. 1.1%, P < 0.01). After PSM, the results remained consistent. For 492 patients without restenosis, 22 patients developed fUTI. Compared with the non-fUTI group, the larger anteroposterior diameter (APD) and higher APD/cortical thickness (P/C) ratio were observed in the fUTI group at three months and six months postoperatively (P < 0.05), but the difference vanished at 12 months and 24 months after surgery (Figure).

DISCUSSION

FUTI after DJ stent removal is not uncommon after LP, and surgeons are often concerned about the possibility of restenosis. In the present study, although our results demonstrated a significant association between them, restenosis patients comprise only about 20% of fUTI patients. Based on our clinical observations, fUTI is often developed in children from 1 to 6 years of age, and the younger patients may be afraid of voiding because of the postoperative pain after DJ stent removal. Besides, intraoperative manipulation of DJ stent removal may lead to transient edema in the anastomotic site, causing the fUTI. For patients who develop fUTI after DJ stent removal but without persistent symptoms, the transient worsening of hydronephrosis during the early postoperative period may not impact long-term outcomes (As shown in Figure). Additional follow-up is needed to prevent the deterioration of renal function.

CONCLUSIONS

Our result demonstrated that fUTI after DJ stent removal is associated with restenosis after LP. For fUTI patients without restenosis, APD and P/C ratio exhibited transient worsening at three months and six months postoperatively, decreasing gradually during follow-up. Patients who develop fUTI after DJ stent removal should be monitored.

Retroperitoneoscopy-Assisted Dismembered Pyeloplasty With Single-Site Plus One Port in Older Children With Congenital Hydronephrosis

INTRODUCTION

This study aimed to clarify the advantage of retroperitoneoscopy-assisted dismembered pyeloplasty with single-site plus one port (RPSPO) for pediatric congenital hydronephrosis in patients aged ≥7 years.

METHODS

We retrospectively compared a group of patients aged ≥7 years (study group) with patients aged <7 years (comparison group), who underwent RPSPO between August 2015 and August 2018, in terms of preoperative patient characteristics, intra- and perioperative results, and postoperative results.

RESULTS

The study group consisted of eight patients. The median body weight at surgery was 27 kg (20-38 kg). The median age at surgery was 102.5 m (87-139 m). The severity of hydronephrosis on the affected side graded by the Society for Fetal Urology grade was grade 3 in one case and grade 2 or less in all other cases. All patients underwent a ^99m Tc-MAG3 renogram. Comparison between the two groups showed significant differences in body weight at surgery (p = 0.003), age (p < 0.001), and preoperative hydronephrosis grade (p = 0.007), but the median length of the skin incision was 20 mm in both groups, with no significant difference (p = 1.000). Redo pyeloplasty was not required in any patient in either group.

CONCLUSION

RPSPO is an advantageous procedure for older children because it allows precise ureteropelvic neoanastomosis under direct vision and the same wound size as in younger children.

Comparison of external stents and DJ stents techniques for pediatric pyeloplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate and compare the efficacy and safety between an external stent and a Double J stent for pediatric Pyeloplasty.

METHODS

Through a systematical search of multiple scientific databases in July 2022, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of the primary outcomes of interest according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses), whose protocol was registered with PROSPERO(CRD42021274087).

RESULTS

Eleven studies involving 1,758 patients were included. No significant differences were observed in operative time (MD: 2.26; 95% CI -9.62 to 14.14; P = 0.79), operative success rate (OR: 1.10; 95% CI 0.57 to 2.10; P = 0.780), length of hospital stay (MD: 0.65; 95% CI -0.04 to 1.34; P = 0.063), or complications (OR: 0.87; 95%CI 0.48 to 1.56; P = 0.630) between external stents and DJ stents in pediatric pyeloplasty. According to the subgroup analysis, we found the external stent group had a shorter operative time than the DJ stent group in terms of robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty (MD: -17.13; 95% CI -32.8 to -1.45; P = 0.032).

CONCLUSIONS

There were no significant differences in operative time, operative success rate, length of hospital stay, or complications between external stents and DJ stents in pediatric pyeloplasty. The external stented procedure seemed to have less operative time when using robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty. However, due to the limitations of our analysis, more studies are still required to support our conclusion.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

This systematic review has been registered on PROSPERO, the registration ID is CRD42021274087.

Comparison between internal double J and external pyeloureteral stents in open pediatric pyeloplasty: A multicenter study

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE

Anderson-Hynes dismembered pyeloplasty is considered the standard surgical treatment for ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO). After pyeloplasty, stent drainage remains controversial. The commonly used stents are either an internal double-J (DJ) or an externalized pyeloureteral (PU) stents. We evaluated the outcome of using DJ versus PU stents following open pyeloplasty for UPJO in children.

STUDY DESIGN

We retrospectively evaluated 175 patients who underwent primary open pyeloplasty in two tertiary hospitals. A total of 110 patients underwent internal DJ stent insertion (63%) while 65 patients (37%) underwent placement of external PU stent. The type of stent used at the time of surgery was according to surgeon preference and experience. Operative time, postoperative hospital stay, overall complications and success rates were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

The mean age was 3.8 years, and the mean follow-up was 4 years. Mean operative time was similar in the two groups (145 min). Mean hospital stay was 3.7 and 4.2 days in DJ and PU stent, respectively (p = 0.003) Summary Table . Postoperative complication developed in 9 out of 110 patients with DJ stent (8%), while complications developed in 6 out of 65 patients with PU stent (9%) (p = 0.81). Success rate of pyeloplasty was 95.5% for DJ group versus 97% for PU group (p = 0.63).

DISCUSSION

Dismembered pyeloplasty remains the standard treatment of choice as a surgical management for UPJO. A debate is still there in respect to the method of PU anastomotic stenting and which stent can be used. The major advantage for external PU stents is that it can be removed safely in the outpatient clinic without any sedation preventing the risk of repeated exposure to general anesthesia. Internal DJ stent provides a shorter hospital stay and comparable complication and success rates compared with PU stent. If we manage to overcome the longer DJ stent duration and facilitate early removal by an easy mode, that does not require another anesthesia at that moment we can find the optimal stent for all pyeloplasty cases.

CONCLUSIONS

The two types of stents are comparable as regard overall complication and success rates after pyeloplasty. Although internal DJ stent insertion provides a relatively shorter hospital stay, a second operating room visit and anesthesia for removal remains unavoidable.

Comparison of Drainage Methods After Pyeloplasty in Children: A 14-Year Study

Objective: To summarize our experiences with drainage methods after laparoscopic pyeloplasty with a 14-year study. Methods: We reviewed the data of the 838 children operated on for hydronephrosis due to congenital ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO) between July 2007 and July 2020. Patients' demographics, perioperative details, postoperative drainage stents [including double-J stent, percutaneous trans-anastomotic (PU) stent, and trans-uretero-cystic external urethral stent (TEUS)], complications, hospital stay, and long-term follow-up outcomes were analyzed. Long-term follow-up was performed by outpatient visits and telephone follow-up. Moreover, we reviewed the details of nine cases of recurrence after laparoscopic pyeloplasty. Results: Comparison of preoperative general data among the three groups indicated that there was no statistical difference in age, gender, and surgical side of the three groups. Statistical differences were found in the incidence of postoperative complications from the three postoperative drainage method groups, especially the incidence of reoperations (p < 0.01): there were six cases (3.19%) of recurrences in the TEUS group, two cases (0.36%) in the DJ group, and one case (0.93%) in the PU group. In the six recurrent cases from the TEUS group, four cases (44.4%) were found to have stenosis, and two cases (22.2%) have iatrogenic valvular formation. Conclusion: Not all three types of drainage methods are suitable for drainage after pyeloplasty. Based on our findings, TEUS is not recommended.

Trans-uretero-cystic external urethral stent for urinary diversion in pediatric laparoscopic pyeloplasty: A novel approach

PURPOSE

We present a new approach for urine drainage in pediatric patients following laparoscopic pyeloplasty, the trans-uretero-cystic external urethral stent (TEUS).

METHODS

We retrospectively identified 85 children who underwent laparoscopic pyeloplasty from July 2015 to June 2017. The included children were assigned to group A (double-J stent) or group B (TEUS). In group A, the double-J stent was removed by a cystoscopy under anesthesia after 1 month, while in group B, the external stent was removed after 5 to 7 days. We examined the durations of operation, hospital stay and the frequency of stent-related complications including urinary leakage, stent dislocation, stent occlusion, and urinary tract infection.

RESULTS

The operation time was significantly longer for patients in group B than for those in group A. No significant difference was observed between the groups regarding stent-related complications. In group A, 4 patients need auxiliary stent re-insertion for the management of complications, 2 developed urinary tract infection, and 2 had stent occlusion. In group B, none needed auxiliary stent re-insertion for complications and avoided re-operation.

CONCLUSIONS

In children, the outcome of external stent implantation was similar to that using double-J stent, and the use of the former approach may be beneficial for younger children.

"Double-Lumen Valve-Controlled Intra-Operative Pyeloplasty Stent (VIPs)": A New Technology for Post-Pyeloplasty Stenting - Proof of Concept Study in a Preclinical Large Animal Model

Background

Pyeloplasty is a common surgical operation with a high success rate. However, significant challenges are to be optimized in the design of stenting systems in order to improve perioperative monitoring of urine drainage and enhance patient and family comfort through easier post-operative care.

Materials and Methods

In a preliminary study in six pigs, handling, mechanical and functional features of this stent system were tested. In our main study, six double-lumen stents (230 mm long each) and 6F/9F external diameter were implanted through the ureteric walls of six domestic pigs to allow postoperative drainage and monitoring following ureteroureterostomy. After a 7-day survival period, monitoring with intravenous antibiotic coverage, and pain control, contrast antegrade pyelogram, under valve control, and renal ultrasonography were conducted and stents explanted and the animals were then euthanized.

Results

The double-lumen valve-controlled stent supported the healing of the neo anastomoses and helped to monitor perioperative urine drainage and perianastomotic leakage accurately. It also guided a well-controlled more informative radiological contrast-supported imaging before removal of the stents that confirmed the healing of the neo anastomotic site and no leak formation. The double-lumen system demonstrated high feasibility regarding its insertion, functionality, and removal capacities. The excellent flexibility of the individual stents allowed exact anatomically controlled implantation.

Conclusion

The double-lumen valve-controlled stent system was studied in a porcine model, which demonstrated its feasibility. Preclinical experience revealed favorable results concerning stent implantation, operability and functionality, in the perioperative management of pyeloplasty or ureteric surgery.

Point your SmartPhone at the code above. If you have a QR code reader the video abstract will appear. Or use:

https://youtu.be/T8AmXn1SMow

Fibrin glue as a sealant in stentless laparoscopic pyeloplasty: A randomised controlled trial

Objective: To evaluate the value of adding fibrin glue, as a sealant material, to the anastomotic line during stentless laparoscopic pyeloplasty (LPP).

Patients and methods: In all, 92 patients with pelvi-ureteric junction obstruction (PUJO), scheduled for LPP, were randomised into two groups (46 in each group). Group A, underwent transperitoneal stentless LLP sealed with fibrin glue, whilst Group B underwent the same procedure without fibrin glue.

Results: Both groups were similar for patient demographics and presentation. Despite that, we found a significant statistical difference between the groups for operative time and blood loss. The total number of patients that had a urinary leak was 10 and 24 patients, in groups A and B respectively (P = 0.002). A prolonged leak lasting for >5 days, which stopped spontaneously occurred in three patients (7.14%) in Group A and six (14.3%) in Group B (P = 0.265). A persistent 14-day leak that needed intervention developed in two patients (4.3%) in Group A and five (10.9%) in Group B (P = 0.434). One patient in Group B developed urinoma 1 week after discharge, and another patient in the same group developed deep venous thrombosis. There was no significant difference between the groups for postoperative complications in the early 3-month period. The success rate was 39 (92.86%) and 36 patients (85.7%), in groups A and B respectively (P = 0.265).

Conclusion: Adding fibrin glue to seal the anastomosis decreased urinary leakage but did not have a significant impact on outcomes.

Abbreviations: CONSORT: Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials; DTPA: diethylene-triamine-penta-acetic acid; LPP: laparoscopic pyeloplasty; PUJO: PUJ obstruction; T½: clearance halftime (renogram)

Pediatric robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty (RALP): does weight matter?

PURPOSE

RALP is rapidly becoming the new gold standard treatment for UPJO in children, who suffer from uretero-pelvic obstruction (UPJO). However, presently there is a lack of data regarding the outcomes of RALP in young infants and smaller children. This study aims to compare the outcomes of RALP in children weighing less than 10 kg and matched with an analogous cohort who underwent open pyeloplasty (OP).

METHODS

We prospectively compared patients who underwent RALP to a matched cohort of patients who underwent OP from our retrospectively acquired data registry. Comparative outcomes included: Demographics, success rate, complications, and length of hospital stay, postoperative pain score and failure rate. Failure was defined as the need for a secondary intervention for UPJO, or worsening hydronephrosis during follow-up.

RESULTS

A total of 15 patients with a median age of 8 months (range 5-11 months) and median weight 7 kg (range 5.6-9.8 kg) underwent RALP between 2016 and 2018, a matched cohort of 15 children who underwent OP similar in terms of age, weight, gender and affected side between 2014 and 2016. All children had prenatal diagnosis of hydronephrosis and underwent surgery utilizing combined general and regional (Caudal MO) anesthesia. Intrinsic obstruction was present in 13 of RALP group (86.7%) and in 14 in OP group (93.3%). Mean operative time was 67.8 + 13.4 min in RALP group, while 66.5 + 9.5 min in OP group. (p = 0.76) All but two patients in RALP group had stent inserted and required subsequent anesthesia for stent removal, while all OP children had a Salle Pyeloplasty stent inserted during the procedure and underwent removal in an ambulatory setting without the need for anesthesia. There were no failures recorded in the RALP group, while one patient in OP required a secondary intervention. Mean hospital stay was 1 day (1-2 days) for RALP and 2 days (2-3 days) for OP. There was no difference in FLACC Pain Scale in both groups. Clavien-Dindo grade I-II complications occurred in one patient from each group. Two patients from RALP underwent subsequent ureteral reimplantation due to accompanying uretero-vescical junction obstruction.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggest that RALP can be performed safely in pediatric patients weighing less than 10 kg. with similar outcomes when compared to patients undergoing an open procedure for the same pathology.

Noncystoscopic removal of retained ureteral stents in children: A retrospective study from a single-center

Cystoscopic technique is the current common method of retrieving double J ureteral stent in most pediatric urological centers. In this study, we evaluated the feasibility and efficacy of a novel noncystoscopic method to remove retained ureteral stents in pediatric patients.We reviewed all medical records from a total of 102 patients who were treated in our hospital between January 2013 and December 2016 to remove the double J ureteral stent retained into the ureter. The pediatric patients were divided into 2 groups based on different surgical options: cystoscopic group and noncystoscopic group. The surgery time (including time for instrument preparation), operation time, expenses, postoperative urination discomfort, and hospitalization were compared between the 2 groups.The noncystoscopic group took significantly less time for surgery and operation than the cystoscopic group (surgery time:7.40 ± 3.75 vs 18.42 ± 2.77 min, P <.05; operation time: 3.54 ± 2.03 vs 4.48 ± 2.04 min, P <.05). The mean spending for patients in the noncystoscopic group were less than that in the cystoscopic group ($736.70 ± 105.96 vs $618.23 ± 110.31, P <.05). There were less children with postoperative urination discomforts in the noncystoscopic group than that in the cystoscopic group (8 vs 20 cases, χ = 4.241, P <.05). The mean hospitalization of the noncystoscopic group was shorter than that of the cystoscopic group (3.20 ± 1.25 vs 4.13 ± 1.63 d, P <.05). The differences in all comparison projects were significant.The noncystoscopic procedure is a safe and viable technique that may be used successfully in pediatric urology. This novel procedure which is much safer and more affordable provides an alternative solution to remove retained ureteral stents in child patients.

A Randomized Control Trial Comparing Outcome after Stented and Nonstented Anderson-Hynes Dismembered Pyeloplasty

Aim

The aim of the study was to compare the efficacy and postoperative complications of stented and nonstented open pediatric dismembered pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction (UPJ) obstruction.

Settings and Design

A balanced, parallel group, prospective randomized controlled trial comparing stented and nonstented Anderson-Hynes Dismembered Pyeloplasty.

Subjects and Methods

It included 42 children who required Anderson-Hynes dismembered pyeloplasty for UPJ obstruction (UPJO). Patients were randomized into stented (double "J" [DJ] stent) and nonstented pyeloplasty groups. The intraoperative and postoperative course was compared. Both groups were analyzed for problems such as dysuria, frequency, pain, hematuria and urinary tract infection, and postoperative renal status.

Statistical Analysis

Mann-Whitney U-test, Fisher's exact test, Student's t-tests, and Chi-squared test were used.

Results

Surgical duration was significantly shorter for the nonstented group as compared to the stented group (60.4 ± 6.49 min vs. 78.9 ± 8.17 min). The intraoperative negotiation of DJ stent was troublesome in 21.7% patients belonging to the stented group. The hospital stay was comparable in both groups (4.67 ± 1.9 vs. 4.28 ± 0.67 days). Patients in stented group had experienced dysuria, loin pain, lower abdominal spasmodic pain, and frequency significantly higher than nonstented group. However, the other problems such as fever, hematuria, and urinary tract infections were more common in stented group, but the difference was not statistically significant. There was no difference in resolution of hydronephrosis in both groups.

Conclusions

There is no statistically significant difference in resolution of hydronephrosis following nonstented or stented dismembered pyeloplasty in children with UPJO. However, the patient is more symptomatic due to stent in the postoperative period.

Is confirmation of ureteric stent placement in laparoscopic pyeloplasty necessary?

PURPOSE

Placement of an antegrade double-J (JJ) ureteric stent is an important component of pyeloplasty. Correct siting of distal end of the stent in the bladder is essential for ease of removal. To date, no studies have compared methods for confirming stent position. This study aims to address that void in the literature.

METHODS

Eligible patients underwent laparoscopic pyeloplasty with antegrade stent placement at our institution from 2007 to 2015 inclusive. Methods to verify distal stent position of rigid cystoscopy, artificial bladder filling or no confirmation were compared. Effectiveness was determined by the proportion of malpositioned stents detected intra-operatively compared to the total found malpositioned, both intra-operatively and during follow-up.

RESULTS

A total of 75 patients underwent laparoscopic pyeloplasty. Forty-six (61.3%) patients had distal stent position assessed intra-operatively, comprising 27 by cystoscopy and 19 by artificial bladder filling, while for 29 (38.7%) patients no verification method was used. Cystoscopy, artificial bladder filling and no confirmation detected intra-operatively 2, 1 and 0 malpositioned stents, from malpositioned stent totals of 2, 2 and 1, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Malposition of JJ ureteric stent is uncommon, and omitting intra-operative position verification appears reasonable in select cases. Artificial bladder filling can help detect malpositioned JJ stents without repositioning the patient for cystoscopy. However, our results suggest both may be unreliable. If stent malposition is suspected, certainty is desired or extended operative duration is less critical, then the surgeon should proceed with cystoscopy.

Use of fibrin glue as a sealant at the anastomotic line in laparoscopic pyeloplasty: A randomised controlled trial

Objective

To assess the effectiveness of fibrin glue as a sealant at the anastomotic line of a stentless laparoscopic pyeloplasty (LPP) repair instead of JJ stent insertion.

Patients and methods

In all, 46 patients with pelvi-ureteric junction obstruction scheduled for LPP were randomised into two groups each containing 23 patients. Group A underwent stented repair, while group B had a stentless repair together with sealing of the anastomotic line with fibrin glue.

Results

There was no statistically significant difference between the groups for the postoperative improvement in the renal scan and intravenous urography. However, there was a statistically significant decrease in early postoperative adverse events in group B. In group A, all the patients had irritative lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) and 16 (72.7%) had postoperative urinary tract infections (UTIs). In group B, no patient had a UTI or irritative LUTS. In all, 21 patients (95.4%) in group A had minimal terminal painful haematuria; while in group B, only one patient (4.3%) had minimal total painless haematuria. Also, patients in group B were spared the need for a second anaesthesia exposure for stent removal.

Conclusion

The use of fibrin glue is a valid alternative to stenting in LPP with the same excellent outcome but with markedly lower short-term postoperative adverse events.

External stent versus double J drainage in patients with radical cystectomy and orthotopic urinary diversion: A randomized controlled trial

OBJECTIVES

To compare treatment-related outcomes of ureteral stenting with an external versus double J stent in patients with orthotopic reservoirs after radical cystectomy.

METHODS

Patients undergoing radical cystectomy and orthotopic neobladder were randomized into two groups; group I patients received external stents, whereas group II received double J stents. In both groups, preoperative parameters were recorded, and patients were assessed regarding urinary tract infection, urinary leakage, upper tract deterioration, readmission and hospital stay.

RESULTS

A total of 48 and 45 patients were randomized in the external stent group and double J group, respectively. Both groups were comparable in terms of age, sex, associated comorbidity and oncological status. Early urinary leak was observed in two patients (4.2%) in the external stent group, and in two patients (4.4%) in the double J group (P = 0.95). None of our patients developed ureteral strictures in the external stent group, and one patient did in the double J group (P = 0.3). Positive urine culture (58.3%, 51.1%) as well as febrile urinary tract infections (2.1%, 6.7%) were comparable between both groups, respectively (P = 0.43, 0.28). Wound complications (12.5%, 8.9%) and stent-related complications (2.1%, 0%) were comparable between both groups, respectively (P = 0.57, 0.33). The mean hospital stay was 17.5 days (range 14-32 days) and 14.6 days (range 10-42 days) in both groups, respectively (P = 0.001), with comparable re-admission rates (P = 0.95).

CONCLUSIONS

Incorporation of double J stents in orthotopic urinary diversion is a safe alternative to the routinely used external stenting.

Impact of drainage technique on pediatric pyeloplasty: Comparative analysis of externalized uretero-pyelostomy versus double-J internal stents

INTRODUCTION

Pediatric pyeloplasty with double J (DJ) stent drainage requires manipulation of the uretero-vesical junction (UVJ) and a second anesthetic for removal. Externalized uretero-pyelostomy (EUP) stents avoid these issues. We report outcomes of laparoscopic and open pyeloplasty with EUP compared to DJ stents in children.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 76 consecutive children who underwent pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction (UPJ) obstruction over a 1-year period by 5 pediatric urologists at a single institution. The exclusion criteria included patients with concomitant urological procedures, other urinary drainage strategies, "stentless" pyeloplasty or patients without follow-up data. Based on surgeon preference, 24 patients had a EUP stent and 38 had a DJ stent placed.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up was 23.8 ± 10.9 months and 21.1 ± 11.1 months for the EUP and DJ stent groups, respectively (p = 0.32). The mean age was 40 ± 54 months and 80 ± 78 months for the EUP and DJ groups, respectively (p = 0.04). The EUP group had a greater proportion of open pyeloplasties (n = 17, 71%) versus the DJ group (n = 16, 42%; p = 0.04). There were no statistically significant differences in operative time, length of stay, and overall complication rate between groups. Complications were divided by timing of complication (intraoperative, before and after 3 months) and according to the Clavien Classification system. There were no statistically significant differences between these subgroups. The limitations of this study include small sample size, potential selection bias, and heterogeneity between both study groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Pyeloplasty using EUP stents does not incur prolonged operative time, longer length of stay or higher complication rate when compared to DJ stents. Within the limitations of this study, EUP stents may be a safe alternative to DJ stents.

Is peri-operative urethral catheter drainage enough? The case for stentless pediatric robotic pyeloplasty

BACKGROUND

The necessity for urinary diversion with trans-anastomotic ureteral stenting during pyeloplasty is currently under debate. Performing a stentless repair could eliminate stent-related morbidity, including: stent migration, urinary tract infection, flank pain, and bladder spasms. In addition, there would be no need for a second procedure and associated anesthesia required for stent removal. This study describes the outcomes of robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty without use of a ureteral stent.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

An IRB-approved prospective database of all pediatric patients undergoing robotic pyeloplasty from July 2012 to July 2014 at a single institution was reviewed. The 'bypass pyeloplasty' or Anderson-Hynes dismembered pyeloplasty (DP) technique was performed. In both groups, neither a ureteral stent nor an abdominal drainage catheter was utilized. Complications were recorded, including: postoperative pain, bladder spasms, fever, and urinary tract infections. Follow-up renal ultrasound was reviewed for hydronephrosis.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven children (17 male, 10 female) with a mean age of 25 months (range 6-157 months) underwent robotic ureteral stentless pyeloplasty during the study time period. The bypass pyeloplasty technique was performed on 19 children (70%). Mean length of stay was 20.2 hours (range 11-46). No fever, urinary tract infections, or hematuria requiring intervention were experienced. Additionally, there were no reports of bladder spasms or pain requiring pharmacotherapy. The mean follow-up was 8 months (range 4-21). Pre-operative Society of Fetal Urology grading was 3.5 and 3.4 for the dismembered and bypass cohort, respectively, with improvements to 1.1 for both groups at 3 months. Postoperative renal ultrasound hydronephrosis resolved in eight children (29.6%), improved in 14 (51.9%), and was stable in five (18.5%). The overall success rate was 100%.

DISCUSSION

This study was limited by its small cohort and short follow-up, which may not thoroughly describe the efficacy of the stentless repair as it has been shown that stricture and re-obstruction can occur several years after surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Robotic stentless pyeloplasty is a feasible alternative to conventional methods, with excellent success rates and minimal complications. Importantly, this technique circumvents the need for a second procedure and the associated risks of anesthesia.

Laparoscopically Guided External Transanastomotic Stenting in Dismembered Pyeloplasty: A Safe Technique

OBJECTIVE

To describe a technique for insertion of external transanastomotic stents during laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty in children of all age-groups. To analyze stent-associated complications and changes in differential renal function (DRF).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A retrospective study was performed of all patients up to 18 years of age undergoing laparoscopic pyeloplasty at our institution between March 2004 and December 2013. We analyzed patients in whom an external transanastomotic stent was placed using a specially constructed semicircular spear. Medical records were reviewed for stent-associated complications such as bleeding, stent dislocation, stent obstruction, and urinary tract infection. Additionally required secondary surgical procedures and changes in DRF were assessed.

RESULTS

A total of 150 patients (155 renal units [RU]) were included in the study, with a median patient age of 22 months (range, 1-214). Stents were removed after a median time of 7 days (range, 3-21). Stent-associated complications were observed in a total of 11 patients (12 RU), consisting of stent dislocations (6 RU), stent obstructions (3 RU), and persistent percutaneous leakage along the stent (1 RU) or after stent removal (2 RU). Stent-associated complications required a secondary surgical procedure in 4 RU. Neither significant blood loss nor urinary tract infection was associated with external transanastomotic stent placement. DRF did not change significantly after the procedure.

CONCLUSION

External transanastomotic stenting during laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty using a specially constructed semicircular spear is a safe technique associated with a low complication rate and only rarely requires secondary surgical procedures for stent-related complications. This technique makes an additional anesthesia for stent removal unnecessary, as it is required for internal urinary diversion.

Pyeloplasty for hydronephrosis: Issues of double J stent versus nephrostomy tube as drainage technique

Aims:

To compare the efficacy, complications, cost analysis and hospital stay between two methods of drainage of the kidney: double J (DJ) stent versus nephrostomy tube following open pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction hydronephrosis.

Patients and Methods:

This was a prospective randomized study of 20 patients in each group over 14 months. Pre and post-operative (3 months) function and drainage were assessed by ethylenedicysteine scan and intravenous urogram.

Results:

Both groups showed similar good improvement in function and drainage. Nephrostomy group had significantly longer hospital stay (P < 0.001) but incurred less cost. Complications with nephrostomy included tube breakage (n = 1) and urine leak after tube removal (n = 2). DJ stents were associated with stent migration (n = 4), increased frequency of micturition (n = 9), dysuria (n = 4) and urinary tract infection (n = 1).

Conclusion:

Both methods of drainage did not interfere with improvement after pyeloplasty. Minor complications were more with DJ stent (P = 0.0003). Although overall cost of treatment was more with stents, they reduced length of hospital stay. Optimal length of stent is essential to reduce complications secondary to migration and bladder irritation.

Unstented laparoscopic pyeloplasty in young children (1-5 years old): a comparison with a repair using double-J stent or transanastomotic externalized stent

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate feasibility of unstented laparoscopic pyeloplasty in young children to prevent pyelonephritis and second anaesthesia.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

During 2006-2013, 70 children (1-5 years old) underwent laparoscopic pyeloplasty for high grade hydronephrosis. Unstented repair was indicated in 34 children (GroupL1), double-J stent was placed in 21 patients (Group L2) and uretero-pyelostomy stent (Cook) in 15 patients (Group L3). Stenting was preferred in large thin-walled pelvis, thin ureter, kidney malrotation, and unfavourable course of crossing vessels. The outcome was compared with age-matched group of 52 children who had open surgery during 1996-2006 (Groups O1, O3).

RESULTS

Operation times were significantly shorter in Groups L1 and L2 than in Group L3; the times were shorter in open repairs. Three patients with crossing vessels from Group L1 had urine leakage and one had obstruction (11.4%). In Group L2, one patient had obstruction, one incorrect placement of the stent, and one girl had serious pyelonephritis (14.3%). In Group L3, displacement of uretero-pyelostomy occurred in one patient (6.7%). There is no statistical difference between laparoscopic groups and between laparoscopic and open groups.

CONCLUSION

Unstented laparoscopic pyeloplasty is a safe procedure in selected young children with favourable anatomical conditions preventing additional anaesthesia and stent-related complications.

Early experience of using transumbilical multi-stab laparoscopic pyeloplasty for infants younger than 3 months

OBJECTIVE

Minimally invasive surgery is increasingly being adopted in pediatric urology practice. The aim of this study is to investigate the feasibility and the safety of transumbilical multi-stab laparoscopic pyeloplasty (TMLP) as a treatment for infants younger than 3 months with severe hydronephrosis.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 63 infants younger than 3 months with severe hydronephrosis who underwent TMLP from June 2010 to March 2013. The operative indications included: 1) prenatal diagnosis of hydronephrosis with anteroposterior renal pelvic diameter greater than 3 cm and Society of Fetal Urology (SFU) Grade 4 hydronephrosis; 2) ipsilateral differential renal function being less than 40%. Patients were followed up with physical examinations, ultrasound and radionuclide scans.

RESULTS

The operations were successfully performed in all 63 patients. There was no conversion, no requirement of additional trocar placement and no intraoperative complication. The median age was 54 (47-87) days. The median operative time was 75 (53-118) minutes. The patients were followed up for 12 (6-36) months. The anastomoses were proved to be patent and the renal parenchymal thickness increased. The renal pelvic anteroposterior diameters were reduced and the renal functions were improved (p < 0.01). In addition, the scars were barely noticeable.

CONCLUSIONS

TMLP for infants younger than 3 months with severe hydronephrosis is feasible, safe and minimally invasive. The cosmetic results are excellent.

The risk factors and clinical significance of acute postoperative complications after unstented pediatric pyeloplasty: a single surgeon's experience

PURPOSE

To analyze the risk factors and clinical significance of postoperative complications after unstented pediatric pyeloplasty.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We analyzed 285 kidney units (KUs) on which unstented pyeloplasty was performed between April 2002 and March 2010. Measures included preoperative factors, postoperative complications, change in postoperative differential renal function (DRF), and failure of pyeloplasty. Risk factors for acute complications requiring additional ureteral stenting and decreased DRF were analyzed.

RESULTS

During a median follow-up period of 67.0 months, an additional ureteral stenting was required in 28 KUs (9.8%) due to the development of acute postoperative complications after unstented pyeloplasty. The incidence of complications increased significantly as preoperative DRF increased. DRF of more than 60% was the only independent risk factor for acute complications. Postoperative decrease in DRF was observed in 58 KUs (22.4%) among 259 KUs analyzed. Pyeloplasty failure was observed in 10 KUs (3.5%). The development of acute complications was not a risk factor for a decrease in DRF or pyeloplasty failure.

CONCLUSIONS

Urinary diversion during pyeloplasty is not related to a decrease in DRF or pyeloplasty failure. However, in patients with a preoperative DRF of greater than 60%, diversion could be considered due to the high prevalence of complications.

Comparison between Double J (DJ) Ureteral Stenting and Percutaneous Nephrostomy (PCN) in Obstructive Uropathy

Objective: To compare the complications rate of percutaneous nephrostomy and double J ureteral stenting in the management of obstructive uropathy.

Methodology: Total number of 300 patients of age 20-80 years who underwent JJ stenting or percutaneous nephrostomy for obstructive uropathy were included in this study. Patients were divided in two groups i.e. A & B. In group A, 100 patients who underwent double J ureteral stenting while in group B, 200 patients who underwent percutaneous nephrostomy tube insertion were included. The stent was inserted retrograde by using cystoscope, under mild sedation or local anesthesia. While the percutaneous nephrostomy was done under ultrasound guidance by using local anesthetic agent. Complications were noted in immediate post-operative period and on follow up.

Results: Majority of the patients were between 36 to 50 years of age with male to female ratio was 2.6:1. The most common cause of obstructive uropathy was stone disease i.e. renal, ureteric or both. Post DJ stent, complications like painful trigon irritation, septicemia, haematuria and stent encrustation were seen in 12.0%, 7.0%, 10.0% and 5.0% patients respectively. On the other hand, post-PCN septicemia, bleeding and tube dislodgment or blockage was seen in 3.5%, 4.5% and 4.5% respectively. In this study, overall success rate for double J stenting was up to 83.0% and for percutaneous nephrostomy (PCN) was 92.0% (p<0.0001).

Conclusion: Percutaneous nephrostomy is a safe and better method of temporary urinary diversion than double J stenting for management of obstructive uropathy with lower incidence of complications.

Time course of hydronephrotic changes following unilateral pyeloplasty

OBJECTIVES

The temporal pattern of hydronephrotic change following pyeloplasty has not been well defined. To address this issue, 23 years of postpyeloplasty follow-up data from a single surgeon were analyzed.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Records of dismembered pyeloplasty from 1986 to 2004 were retrospectively reviewed. Ultrasound follow-ups were conducted at 3-6-month intervals after surgery for up to 3 years, and were then extended to either annually or biannually until the completion of puberty. Overall outcome of hydronephrosis (HN), timing of initial improvement and normalization were determined. Factors associated with these changes were examined.

RESULTS

Of 215 patients who completed follow-up of at least 5 years, about 80% experienced either normalization or improvement. Once they had shown improvement of HN during follow-up, no recurrence was observed. The median time for recognition of initial improvement and normalization of HN was 8 months and 41 months after surgery, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that the presence of immediate postoperative obstruction was a negative factor for initial improvement. Symptomatic presentation and no initial improvement until 6 months after pyeloplasty turned out to be negative factors for normalization.

CONCLUSIONS

The results confirm the excellent long-term outcome of pyeloplasty, and highlight the importance of frequent ultrasound until initial improvement of HN, when subsequent ultrasound follow-ups may be safely omitted to focus on follow-up of renal function, proteinuria and hypertension.

External extension of double-J ureteral stent during pyeloplasty: inexpensive stent and non-cystoscopic removal

PURPOSE

The purpose of the study is to describe our experience with the application of externalized double-J ureteral stent (DJUS) during pyeloplasty for correction of ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO) in order to avoid cystoscopy for stent removal.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Pyeloplasty was performed in 523 infants with UPJO using miniature pyeloplasty technique. After removing the obstructed segment, a 3-Fr. DJUS was placed into the ureter. In order to avoid cystoscopy for the removal of the stent, a feeding tube was passed through the skin and renal pelvis via a separate stab incision, connected to the DJUS and secured to the external body surface (skin), and the pyeloplasty was completed. The feeding tube along with the stent was removed after 3-4 weeks, respectively. Postoperative follow-up visits were performed 1, 3, and 6 months after the procedure.

RESULTS

The mean operative time was 49 min (range 41-79). Patients were discharged after 17 ± 2 h (mean ± SD). No patient experienced bladder spasm or anticholinergic administration. Forty-four patients (8.4 %) experienced minor complications including non-febrile urinary tract infections and mild hematuria. No major complication including urinoma, leakage, and stent migration or displacement was observed during the follow-up period. Stent removal was tolerated by 99.8 % of patients in an outpatient setting with minimal discomfort without performing cystoscopy.

CONCLUSIONS

Using external DJUS along with a pyelocutaneous stent extension during pyeloplasty is a safe, feasible, and beneficial technique. This technique resulted in high success rate with minimal cost and no renal injury. The non-cystoscopic stent removal and elimination of urethral catheterization following pyeloplasty are the other advantages of this technique.

Duration of urinary leakage after open non-stented dismembered pyeloplasty in pediatric patients

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to determine the duration and associated complications of postoperative urinary leakage in pediatric patients undergoing open, non-stented dismembered pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction.

METHODS

A retrospective review of 100 patients who underwent an open non-stented dismembered pyeloplasty between 2003 and 2008 was performed. Duration of urinary leakage and postoperative complications were tabulated. Patients were considered to have a dry anastomosis if the Penrose drain was removed within one week of surgery.

RESULTS

Duration of leakage ranged from 0 to 27 days. 86% had Penrose drain removal within 7 days of surgery and were considered dry.14 patients demonstrated a persistent urinary leakage (PUL) ranging from 7 to 27 days. Complications of any type were significantly more likely in the group with prolonged drainage (p = .0126). UTI and obstruction were not significantly more likely to occur in patients with PUL (p = .0931 and p = .2616 respectively). Only one patient with PUL required placement of a ureteral stent.

CONCLUSION

We demonstrate that stentless dismembered pyeloplasty is feasible with a low rate of urinary drainage beyond one week. The character and quality of the slightly increased complications in those that demonstrated PUL were not great and not bothersome enough to warrant routine stenting.

[Pyeloplasty without intrarenal stent in pediatric patients]

PURPOSE

In spite of advances in minimally invasive endoscopic surgery, open dismembered pyeloplasty continues to be used in many pediatric centers, especially in small children. The purpose of this work is to present our experience in the performance of this technique using a minimally invasive open pyeloplasty without intrarenal stents.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A retrospective review was made of patients between July 1992 and July 2009. During this time, 348 patients underwent open dismembered pyeloplasty. A total of 310 patients (89%), 223 boys and 87 girls, underwent open pyeloplasty without intrarenal stent. The incision was from 2 to 2.5 cm in the flank. An extrarenal drain (3-5 days) and a bladder catheter (< 24 hs) were placed in all patients.

RESULTS

A total of 319 pyeloplasties were performed without intrarenal catheter in our Service. Of these, 174 (54.5%) were on the left side, 127 (39.8%) on the right side and 9 (5.6%) were bilateral. Age interval was 14 days to 18 years, 58% of the children being younger than 12 months at the time of surgery. With a mean follow-up of 6.7 years (17 years to 11 months), 312 pyeloplasties (97.8%) were successful, with persistence of the obstructive patient in 7 patients who required a new open pyeloplasty (2.2%). Other complications were: prolonged drainage (6), wound infection (1), and urinary infection (2). Mean stay was 22 hours.

CONCLUSIONS

Open dismembered pyeloplasty is a safe and effective treatment choice for pyeloureteral stenosis in children and can be done without intrarenal stents with no detriment to its success.

Unilateral anomalies of kidney development: why is left not right?

Abnormal renal development results in congenital anomalies of the kidney and urinary tract. As many studies suggest that renal malformations are more often found on the left side, a meta-analysis was performed on the distribution of five different unilateral anomalies: multicystic dysplastic kidney, renal agenesis/aplasia, renal ectopia, pelviureteral junction obstruction, and non-obstructive non-refluxing megaureter. Of these anomalies, the left side was affected in 53%, 57%, 56.9%, 63.2%, and 62.5% of patients, respectively, significantly different when compared with an anticipated 50% of left-sided anomalies. An exception to this left-side predominance was found in females with combined genital anomalies and unilateral renal agenesis that commonly present on the right side. The exact mechanisms leading to these lateralizations remain to be determined but may involve vascular development, differential gene expression, or susceptibility to environmental factors such as hypoxia. This remains largely speculative, however, illustrating our limited knowledge of embryogenesis in general and nephrogenesis in particular.

Transpelvic anastomotic stenting: a good option for diversion after pyeloplasty in children

PURPOSE

Several options are available to drain the renal pelvis after a dysmembered pyeloplasty. The purpose of our study was to review the results of transrenal pelvic transanastomotic stenting following ureteropelvic junction obstruction pyeloplasty (UPJO).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A retrospective chart review of 238 patients with UPJO (243 renal units) treated in 2004-2007. The patients were divided into 4 groups (1): renal units with very poor function (<10% uptake) having undergone nephrostomy tube placement, with pyeloplasty performed 1 month later for those with improved renal function, and nephrectomy for those with no improvement (2); pyeloplasty without diversion (3); pyeloplasty diverted with transrenal pelvis transanastomotic stenting (4); pyeloplasties diverted with both stents and Foley catheters; the stents used were 5 Fr or 6 Fr feeding tubes.

RESULTS

Group 1: 13 nephrectomies and 31 pyeloplasties diverted with stents and Foley catheters; 1/31 re-do pyeloplasty. Group 2: 33 pyeloplasties that were performed without diversion or stenting; 2/33 required re-do pyeloplasty. Group 3: 122 pyeloplasties diverted with only stents inserted through renal pelvis with 1 nephrostomy due to urine leakage, 2 prolonged urine leaks that ceased spontaneously, 1 urinary infection, no re-do pyeloplasty needed. Group 4: 44 pyeloplasties that were performed with stents and nephrostomy tubes, 2 delays of removal of Foley catheters, no re-do pyeloplasty needed.

CONCLUSIONS

Transrenal pelvis transanastomotic stenting using a feeding tube is a good option for diverting urine following dysmembered pyeloplasty in children.

Functional outcome after laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty in children

OBJECTIVE

Laparoscopic or retroperitoneoscopic pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction in children has become a routine procedure. The aim of this study was to evaluate functional outcome for patients who had undergone a laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Seventy children underwent a laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty. Median follow up was 24 months (1-48). We reviewed differential renal function (DRF) and tracer clearance with diuretic renography before as well as 3 and 12 months after operation. Ultrasound was used to determine the grade of hydronephrosis pre- and postoperatively.

RESULTS

Median age at operation was 20 months (1-178). Median operating time was 140 min (95-220). Mean DRF could be preserved with no significant difference (P>0.05). All patients showed a significant improvement in tracer clearance on diuretic renography postoperatively (P<0.0001). Ultrasound examinations postoperatively showed a diminished grade of hydronephrosis without significance (P=0.657).

CONCLUSION

In terms of preservation of DRF the laparoscopic approach is as effective as open surgery. Tracer clearance is significantly improving. Operating times for laparoscopic pyeloplasty are competitive. We conclude that laparoscopic pyeloplasty requires extensive experience in laparoscopic pediatric urology but might replace the open surgical procedure as gold standard in the operative treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction.

Transmesocolic laparoscopic pyeloplasty in children: a standard approach for the left-side repair

OBJECTIVE

To compare the transmesocolic approach in the left laparoscopic pyeloplasty with the laterocolic right-side repair in children.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Dismembered pyeloplasty was performed in 77 consecutive children aged 1.2-18.2 years. The transmesocolic approach was used in 49 patients with left hydronephrosis (group I) and the conventional laterocolic approach in 28 patients with right hydronephrosis (group II). Three age groups were defined.

RESULTS

The transmesocolic approach was applicable in 48 of 49 patients (98%); the colic vessels were preserved. The operation time was significantly shorter in the transmesocolic group, also when comparing patients with similar age, incidence of crossing vessels and urinary diversion. A shorter operation time was achieved in children without internal urine diversion. Postoperative complications were encountered in 6.3% of group I and 7.1% of group II without any conversion to open repair or recurrence of obstruction within a 2.5-year follow-up period.

CONCLUSIONS

The transmesocolic approach offers clear anatomy and provides safe access to the dilated left renal pelvis and crossing vessels. The operative time is shorter due to very limited tissue dissection. The medial reflection of the colon is avoided. This approach allows for microsurgical performance of the left-side pyeloplasty in all paediatric age groups.

Complications of trans-anastomotic externalised stents in open pyeloplasty: influence of the method of placement, the duration of stenting, and the associated bladder drainage

PURPOSE

To assess the influence of the method for stent placement, the duration of stenting, and the presence of bladder drainage on the complication rate of open pyeloplasty.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Complications were, retrospectively, compared in 228 consecutive open pyeloplasties performed at institution A using a trans-pyelostomic 6-Fr splint/stent for 5 days and no bladder drainage, and 150 consecutive open pyeloplasties performed at institution B using a trans-nephrostomic 6-Fr splint/stent for 9 days plus bladder drainage.

RESULTS

Median age at surgery was comparable between groups. The overall complication rate was 13% and was comparable at the two institutions, but for the presence of perioperative bleeding that was more common when the stent was placed trans-nephrostomically (institution B) and the rate of stent dislodgements, which was lower at institution A, perhaps due to some technical details aiming to prevent any inadvertent traction on the stent. Additional procedures, such as double J internal stent insertion, were required in <2% of cases.

CONCLUSIONS

A 5-day period of stenting after open pyeloplasty is generally enough. Trans-nephrostomic and trans-pyelostomic stent placement is equally effective. However, the former can be associated with a slightly higher bleeding rate. Details during stent placement are keys to avoid postoperative dislodgement and malfunctioning. Systematic bladder drainage seems unnecessary.