Long-term results of endoscopic treatment of vesicoureteric reflux with different tissue-augmenting substances

Endoscopic injection of bulking agents in pediatric vesicoureteral reflux: a narrative review of the literature

In the last 20 years, endoscopic injection (EI) has affirmed as a valid alternative to open surgery for management of pediatric vesicoureteral reflux (VUR). This study aimed to investigate and discuss some debated aspects such as indications, bulking agents and comparison, techniques of injection and comparison, predictive factors of success, use in specific situations. EI is minimally invasive, well accepted by patients and families, with short learning curve and low-morbidity profile. It provides reflux resolution rates approaching those of open reimplantation, ranging from 69 to 100%. Obviously, the success rate may be influenced by several factors. Recently, it is adopted as first-line therapy also in high grade reflux or complex anatomy such as duplex, bladder diverticula, ectopic ureters. The two most used materials for injection are Deflux and Vantris. The first is absorbable, easier to inject, has lower risk of obstruction, but can lose efficacy over time. The second is non-absorbable, more difficult to inject, has higher risk of obstruction, but it is potentially more durable. The two main techniques are STING and HIT. To date, the ideal material and technique of injection has not yet clearly established, but the choice remains dependent on surgeon's preference and experience.

Comparison of polyacrylate polyalcohol copolymer (PPC) and dextranomer/hyaluronic acid (Dx/HA) for treatment of vesicoureteral reflux. A systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Our study aimed to compare the efficacy of polyacrylate polyalcohol copolymer and Dextranomer-Hyaluronic Acid for endoscopic treatment of vesicoureteral reflux.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, Web of science, Ovid, Cochrane databases, Google scholar have been searched for studies published until January 2022 in any language. Studies that compared the success rate for endoscopic treatment of vesicoureteral reflux in children with two bulking agents, namely, "polyacrylate polyalcohol copolymer." and "Dextranomer-Hyaluronic Acid" were included for this analysis.

RESULTS

Nine studies were included in data synthesis for this meta-analysis. Pooled data with a total of 763 ureters in PPC group and 718 ureters in Dx/HA group indicated that ureters in PPC group were more likely to undergo complete reflux resolution than Dx/HA (OR 3.80, 95% CI: 2.71; 5.31). Among subgroup of patients with high grade reflux, PPC injection had more resolution rate compared to Dx/HA patients (OR: 2.92, 95% CI: 1.19-7.16). In total, 95.81% of the PPC group and 86.52% of the Dx/HA group experienced success after the third injection. However a concerning complication of endoscopic treatment which is ureterovesical junction obstruction (UVJO) was more prevalent in PPC group. So the possible benefits arising from endoscopic treatment with PPC could be offset by the costs of re-implantation surgery or stenting in the case of UVJO.

CONCLUSION

These data indicate that PPC injection for vesicoureteral reflux treatment was associated with a higher success rate, but concerningly, UVJO incidence was higher in the PPC group which might negate the possible benefits of PPC injection However, due to the lack of studies with long-term follow-up, we couldn't reach a definitive conclusion about the superiority of one of the bulking agents over the other.

Magnetic Agarose Microspheres/Hyaluronic Acid Hydrogel as a Trackable Bulking Agent for Vesicoureteral Reflux Treatment

Vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) is one of the most common congenital anomalies in the kidney and the urinary tract. Endoscopic subureteral injection of a bulking agent has become popular in VUR treatment due to its high success rates, few complications, and a straightforward procedure. In this study, a novel magnetic bulking agent was prepared by embedding Fe₃O₄ magnetic nanoparticles in cross-linked agarose microspheres with diameters of 80–250 μm and dispersing the magnetic microspheres in a hyaluronic acid hydrogel. The bulking agent has good biocompatibility and biosecurity validated by the tests of cytotoxicity, in vitro genotoxicity, animal irritation, skin sensitization, acute systemic toxicity, and pathological analysis after the injection of the bulking agent extract solution into healthy mice as well as injection of the bulking agent into VUR rabbits. The VUR rabbits were created by incising the roof of the intravesical ureter to enlarge the ureteral orifice. The success rate of the bulking agent in treating VUR rabbits using a subureteral transurethral injection technique was 67% (4/6) or 80% (4/5, excluding the unfinished rabbit), and no migrated particles were found in the organs of the rabbits. The transverse relaxation rate of the bulking agent was 104 mM⁻¹s⁻¹. After injection, the bulking agent was long-term trackable through magnetic resonance imaging that can help clinicians to inspect the VUR treatment effect. For the first time, this study demonstrates that the bulking agent with a long-term stable tracer is promising for endoscopic VUR treatment.

Endoscopic Correction of Reflux Utilizing Polyacrylate Polyalcohol Bulking Copolymer (Vantris) as a Tissue Augmenting Substance: Lessons Learned Over the 10 Years of Experience

Objectives: To prove the hypothesis that modifying the endoscopic correction of vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) technique (STING procedure) and sharpening its contraindications, lead to increased success rate and decline in the complication rate. Materials and Methods: All patients that underwent endoscopic correction of VUR utilizing Vantris were divided into two groups according to procedure date; before 2015 and 2015-2019. Indication for treatment included persistent high-grade VUR or breakthrough infections. Contraindications included voiding dysfunction, active infection and since 2015 suspicion for obstructive/refluxing ureterovesical junction (UVJ) presented by "beak" sign on voiding cystourethrography (VCUG). Follow-up regiment included ultrasound and VCUG at predetermined intervals. Results: The first group included 215 (158 girls and 57 boys) children with mean age of 4.8 ± 2.8 years who underwent endoscopic correction between 2009 and 2015 and the second group included 42 children (28 girls and 14 boys) with mean age of 3.9 ± 2.1 years who underwent surgery between 2015 and 2019. In the first group, VUR was unilateral in 74 patients and bilateral in 132 comprising 338 renal refluxing units. In the second group, VUR was unilateral in 14 patients and bilateral in 30 comprising 74 RRUs. In the first group reflux was corrected in 317 (94.9%) RRUs after a single injection, after the second in 7 (2.1%) RRUs. In seven (2.1%) RRUs, reflux downgraded to Grade I-II. Three RRUs (0.9%) failed endoscopic correction and required ureteral reimplantation. Nine (2.7%) RRUs developed UVJ obstruction. In the second group reflux was corrected in 61 (82.4%) RRUs after a single injection, after the second in 12 (16.2%) RRUs. In one (1.4%) RRU, endoscopic correction failed and required ureteral reimplantation. None of the patients developed UVJ obstruction. Reflux correction has led to the significant decrease of febrile urinary tract infection (UTI) in both groups. Conclusions: Our data indicate that endoscopic injection utilizing Vantris is safe and long durable procedure. Although utilizing the proper technique and contraindication criteria, the rates of post procedural VUJ obstruction is null.

What are the predictive factors leading to ureteral obstruction following endoscopic correction of VUR in the pediatric population?

BACKGROUND

It is extremely important to not only address the short-term success following endoscopic correction of vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) but also the long-term efficacy and safety of the tissue augmenting substance utilized for endoscopic correction.

OBJECTIVE

This study retrospectively evaluated all cases of ureterovesical junction (UVJ) obstruction following endoscopic treatment of VUR over the last 5 years utilizing two tissue augmenting substances, with special emphasis on the safety of Vantris^®, and performed clinical and histological review of these patients.

METHODS

The study population comprised 2495 patients who underwent endoscopic correction of VUR utilizing Deflux^® (1790) and Vantris^® (705). Tissue sections were stained with hematoxylin & eosin and trichrome, and examined under a light microscope. Nine primary obstructive megaureters after ureteral re-implantation served as controls.

RESULTS

Nine (0.5%) children (three female and six male) in the Deflux group and nine (1.3%) (five females and four males) in the Vantris group developed UVJ obstruction and required ureteral re-implantation. Obstruction developed during the period ranging 2-49 months (average 16 months) following endoscopic correction. The primary reflux grade was III in seven, IV in six, and V in six children. The mean volume of the injected material in all obstructed patients was 1.2 ± 0.6 cc (mean ± SD). Histopathological analysis revealed a pseudocapsule composed of fibrous tissue and foreign-body giant cells surrounding the Vantris implant in all patients. The distal part of the ureters demonstrated significant ureteral dilatation without ureteral fibrosis. In all patients, additional biopsies from the muscularis propria adjacent to the injection site were examined and showed no significant abnormalities. There was an increased collagen deposition in the juxtavesical segment of the obstructive ureters following Deflux and Vantris injections, and of primary obstructive megaureter. No significant difference was found in the tissue response between Deflux and Vantris patients and controls. Statistical analysis of the nonhomogeneous population demonstrated higher obstruction rates in patients from the Vantris group. However, no statistical difference was demonstrated regarding the obstruction rate in the homogenous group with relation to gender, age and reflux grade group of patients. Moreover, univariate analysis revealed that Grade V reflux, the presence of beak sign on the reviewed pretreatment, and inflamed bladder mucosa upon injection were significant independent risk factors leading to obstruction.

DISCUSSION

This study suggested that the underlining ureteral pathology lead to UVJ obstruction following Vantris injection. There was increased collagen deposition in the juxtavesical segment of the obstructive ureters following Vantris injection. Furthermore, these findings were similar to those discovered in patients who underwent endoscopic correction with Deflux, and in patients who required ureteral reimplantation due to primary obstructive megaureter. Additional biopsies from the muscularis propria adjacent to the injection site showed no significant abnormalities, ironing out the fact that Vantris did not led to adverse tissue reaction following injection. Univariate analysis further ironed out the hypothesis that underlying ureteral pathology was responsible for the increased incidence of UVJ obstruction and demonstrated that Grade V reflux, the presence of beak sign on the reviewed pretreatment VCUG, and inflamed bladder mucosa upon injection were significant independent risk factors leading to obstruction.

CONCLUSION

Data showed that Vantris injection did not lead to any different ureteral fibrosis or inflammatory changes to the tissue augmenting substances utilized in past and present clinical practice, and therefore did not seem to increase the incidence of UVJ obstruction. High reflux grade, presence of obstructive/refluxing megaureter and inflamed bladder mucosa were the only statistically significant and independent predictive factors for UVJ obstruction following endoscopic correction of VUR.

Changing bulking agent may require change in injection volume for endoscopic treatment of vesicoureteral reflux

Introduction:

Various bulking agents were utilized for endoscopic correction of VUR. A study reviewing multi-institutional data showed that the amount of injection material has increased over time with the purpose of improving success rates, which also resulted in costs. We noticed an opposite trend in our center since we started using a new bulking agent. The aim of this study was to evaluate evolution of our practice with different bulking agents.

Patients and Methods:

Records of VUR patients who underwent subureteric injection with polyacrylate polyalcohol copolymer (PPC) and dextronomere hyaluronic acide (DxHA) between 2005 and 2014 were reviewed. Variation of different parameters throughout the study period was evaluated along with the success rate. Success was defined as complete resolution of reflux.

Results:

A total of 260 patients with 384 refluxing units were included. The success rate was higher in PPC group compared to DxHA group. There was no statistically significant difference between years regarding distribution of VUR grade, body weight, patient height, and age in PPC group. Despite significant reduction in injection volume, success rate did not decrease through the years with PPC.

Conclusion:

Different bulking agents may require different injection volumes to achieve the same success rate in endoscopic treatment of vesicoureteral reflux. Habits gained with previous experience using other materials should be revised while using a new agent.

Durasphere® EXP: a non-biodegradable agent for treatment of primary Vesico-Ureteral reflux in children

Introduction:

Durasphere^® EXP (DEXP) is a compound of biocompatible and non--biodegradable particles of zirconium oxide covered with pyrolytic carbon. The aim of this study is to evaluate the durability of off-label use of DEXP in the treatment of primary vesicoureteral reflux in children.

Materials and Methods:

Patients who underwent subureteric injection of DEXP for the correction of primary VUR were retrospectively reviewed. Patients aged >18 years as well as those who had grade-I or -V VUR, anatomic abnormalities (duplicated system, hutch diverticulum), neurogenic bladder or treatment refractory voiding dysfunction were excluded. Radiologic success was defined as the resolution of VUR at the 3rd month control. Success was radiographically evaluated at the end of the first year.

Results:

Thirty-eight patients (9 boys, 29 girls; mean age, 6.3±2.7 years) formed the study cohort. Forty-six renal units received DEXP (grade II: 22; grade III: 18; grade IV: 6). Mean volume per ureteric orifice to obtain the mound was 0.70±0.16mL. First con- trol VCUG was done after 3 months in all patients. After the first VCUG, 6 patients had VUR recurrence. Short-term radiologic success of DEXP was 84.2%. Rate of radiologic success at the end of the first year was 69.4% (25/32). Lower age (p:0.006) and lower amount of injected material (p:0.05) were associated with higher success rates at the end of 1 year.

Conclusion:

This is the first study to assess the outcomes of DEXP for treatment of primary VUR in children. After 1 year of follow-up, DEXP had a 69.4% success rate.

Factors involved in the late failure of endoscopic treatment of vesicoureteral reflux

INTRODUCTION

The short-term results of endoscopic treatment of vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) are excellent. Over time, however, a number of patients have been identified for whom VUR reappeared after being resolved with this technique. The aim of this study was to analyse the factors related to this event.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A retrospective, analytical, case-control study included 395 ureteral units with primary VUR treated successfully at our centre, with a minimum follow-up of 3 years. We identified cases in which VUR reappeared and analysed the demographic variables, those related to VUR (grade, laterality, initial study) and those related to the operation (materials used).

RESULTS

We identified 77 ureteral units with recurrence in the 395 included units (19.5%). The recurrence rate was 29.7% for the patients treated with dextranomer/hyaluronic acid (Dx/HA), 20.2% for those treated with polydimethylsiloxane (MP) and 12.2% for polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE). The onset of recurrence rose to 35% for patients treated before 1 year of age and those with gradeV VUR. Urinary dysfunction symptoms also increased the recurrence rate to 34.9%.

CONCLUSION

The use of resorbable dextranomer/hyaluronic acid material was related to recurrence in the endoscopic treatment of VUR. The high-grade reflux and treatment at an early age, as well as the presence of urinary dysfunction, are also factors associated with recurrence.

Endoscopic correction of vesicoureteral reflux in children using polyacrylate-polyalcohol copolymer (Vantris): 5-years of prospective follow-up

Introduction

The endoscopic correction of vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) in children is a currently well accepted therapy in many pediatric urology centers. Polyacrylate-polyalcohol copolymer (PPC), namely Vantris^®, is one of the tissue-augmenting substances used for endoscopic reflux therapy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the results with PPC in children.

Material and methods

From 2012 to 2016, 125 children (73 girls and 52 boys) aged 0.6–17.9 years (mean 4.9 ±3.58) were treated with PPC. VUR was unilateral in 64 and bilateral in 61 patients, comprising 197 renal refluxing units (RRUs) grades: II in 72, III in 50, IV in 33 and V in 42. Of these primary reflux was present in 132 RRUs and 65 were complex cases. Voiding cystourethrogram (VCUG) was done 3 months after procedure.

Results

Follow-up was completed in 89.6% of patients (112 children), and 89.8% of RRUs (177 out of 197). Reflux resolved in 86.4% of RRUs after single injection, in 99.4% after second and in 100% after the third. The only significant, but serious complication observed was late ureteral obstruction after PPC injection correcting high grade reflux, which required ureteral re-implantation. This complication was found in 9 out of 112 children (8%), and in 11 out of 177 RRUs (6.2%), 1.1 -2.9 years (mean 2 ±0.7) after the PPC injection. The longest follow-up reaches 4.5 years.

Conclusions

Our data show that the PPC injection is an effective procedure for treating all grades of VUR with high success rate. However, because of the possibility of late ureteral obstruction, which requires ureteroneocystostomy, long-term follow-up is mandatory.

Endoscopic Treatment of Vesicoureteral Reflux in Infants. Can We Do It and Should We Do It?

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the outcomes of endoscopic treatment of vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) performed on infants, and to discuss the possible role of this approach in selected cases.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted on the patients who underwent endoscopic injection of a bulking substance for VUR in our institution, and a comparison was made with patients treated during infancy and those treated later in life.

RESULTS

A total of 463 ureteral units were included (296 children), of whom 47 were patients less than 1 year of age (infants, INF group); the remaining 416 were included in a second group (children, CHL). In this study, the percentage of high-grade VUR and presence of reflux nephropathy were significantly higher in younger patients. Both early failure and recurrence rate were significantly higher in the INF group when compared with the CHL group. No complications were observed in the INF group.

CONCLUSION

Endoscopic treatment of VUR is feasible in patients less than 1 year of age. The effectiveness is lower than when patients are treated at a later age but was still over 80% in our series. There were no complications reported related to the procedure itself or to the general anesthesia. Once it is known that endoscopic treatment of VUR can be performed, controversy arises about the indication of treating patients with VUR. Careful selection of VUR cases that are less likely to spontaneously resolve, presence of breakthrough infections, and parental preference, all play a role in the decision-making process.

Endoscopic injection therapy

Since the U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved dextranomer/hyaluronic acid copolymer (Deflux) for the treatment of vesicoureteral reflux, endoscopic injection therapy using Deflux has become a popular alternative to open surgery and continuous antibiotic prophylaxis. Endoscopic correction with Deflux is minimally invasive, well tolerated, and provides cure rates approaching those of open surgery (i.e., approximately 80% in several studies). However, in recent years a less stringent approach to evaluating urinary tract infections (UTIs) and concerns about long-term efficacy and complications associated with endoscopic injection have limited the use of this therapy. In addition, there is little evidence supporting the efficacy of endoscopic injection therapy in preventing UTIs and vesicoureteral reflux-related renal scarring. In this report, we reviewed the current literature regarding endoscopic injection therapy and provided an updated overview of this topic.

Comparison of histopathological characteristics of polyacrylate polyalcohol copolymer with dextranomer/hyaluronic acid after injection beneath the bladder mucosa layer: a rabbit model

OBJECTIVES

To compare short- and long-term local tissue reaction of polyacrylate polyalcohol copolymer (PPC) with dextranomer/hyaluronic acid (DHA) in rabbits.

METHODS

Eight healthy New Zealand rabbits were randomly divided into two groups. In group I (control group), DHA was injected just beneath the mucosal layer of the bladder wall, while PPC was injected in group II. Subcutaneous injection of both bulking agents was also performed in nude mice. Histological evaluations with leukocyte common antibody (LCA), CD68, CD31, and CD34 were conducted on biopsies 1 and 6 months postoperatively. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and MTT assay were also performed for these two bulking agents.

RESULTS

SEM images revealed larger particle size of PPC. LCA and CD68 staining was significantly higher in group II as compared with group I in both short- and long-term follow-ups. However, in groups I and II, expression of CD31 (101 ± 0.5 vs. 92 ± 0.25, p > 0.05) and CD34 (115 ± 0.75 vs. 103 ± 0.5, p > 0.05) was not significantly different in long-term follow-up. Remarkably, severe fibrosis was observed in group II as compared to mild fibrosis in group I one month after injection. The results of in vivo application of these bulking agents in nude mice were in accordance with the results obtained from rabbit model. MTT assay revealed that cell proliferation was significantly higher in the presence of DHA as compared with PPC.

CONCLUSION

Severe inflammation and fibrosis in PPC may be due to continued foreign body reaction, presence of alcohol polymers, or larger particle sizes.

Polyacrylamide Hydrogel as a Bulking Agent for the Endoscopic Treatment of Vesicoureteral Reflux: Long-Term Results and Safety

PURPOSE

Polyacrylamide hydrogel has been shown to offer good short-term success for the endoscopic treatment of vesicoureteral reflux. Our objective was to provide long-term results of its efficacy and safety.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a prospective study using polyacrylamide hydrogel to treat all grades of vesicoureteral reflux. Every patient underwent endoscopic injection of polyacrylamide hydrogel followed by 3-month postoperative renal ultrasound and voiding cystourethrogram. Renal ultrasound was repeated at 12 and 36 months. Treatment success was defined as the absence of de novo or worsening hydronephrosis and the absence of reflux. Safety elements included new or worsening hydronephrosis, calcifications of the injected material and urinary tract infections.

RESULTS

A total of 76 patients (123 refluxing renal units) were assessed. Median age at surgery was 45 months and median followup was 36 months. Median injected volume of hydrogel per refluxing renal unit was 1.0 ml. The overall success rate 3 months after a single injection was 71%. During long-term followup 68 of 70 eligible patients underwent 12-month ultrasound and 40 of 46 underwent 36-month ultrasound. No upper tract deterioration or bulking agent calcifications were reported. Nine (12%) and 2 patients (3%) presented with nonfebrile and febrile urinary tract infections, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The success rate of polyacrylamide hydrogel for endoscopic treatment of vesicoureteral reflux is comparable to published results of dextranomer hyaluronic acid. The long-term safety data and potential lower cost of polyacrylamide hydrogel provide further support for the use of this nonparticulate bulking agent to treat reflux.

Comparison of results of endoscopic correction of vesicoureteral reflux in children using two bulking substances: Dextranomer/hyaluronic acid copolymer (Deflux) versus polyacrylate-polyalcohol copolymer (Vantris)

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic correction of vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) in children offers minimally invasive management and is widely used as a first-line procedure for all grades of reflux. However, there is debate about which tissue-augmenting substance is the best to use. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of two bulking substances, Deflux (Dx/HA) and Vantris (PPC), for endoscopic treatment of VUR in children.

METHODS

From 2009 to 2012, 65 children (50 girls and 15 boys) aged 1.45-9.9 years (mean 4.85 ± 2.52) underwent endoscopic correction of VUR using Deflux. VUR was unilateral in 31 patients and bilateral in 34 patients, comprising 108 renal refluxing units (RRUs) grades: II in 52, III in 47, IV in 7, and V in 2. From 2012, 68 children (43 girls and 25 boys) aged 0.6-17.9 years (mean 4.89 ± 3.46) were treated with Vantris. VUR was unilateral in 33 and bilateral in 35 patients, comprising 109 RRUs grades: II in 48, III in 29, IV in 13, and V in 19. Voiding cystourethrogram was done 3 months after procedure.

RESULTS

All patients completed follow-up (summary Table). With Deflux, reflux resolved in almost 93% of RRUs after two procedures (in 63% after first injection), with Vantris, VUR was corrected in the same percentage after one procedure.

DISCUSSION

The success rate with Deflux ranges between 68% and 92% (only 50-70% after single injection). The reported possibility of reflux recurrence after successful Deflux treatment, and the need for repeated injection led to introduction of the new substance Vantris. The results of a multi-centre survey published in 2014 showed that reflux is corrected in more than 90% of cases after single PPC injection. Our results with PPC confirm a high level of reflux resolution.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data show that Vantris injection is a safe and effective procedure for treating all grades of VUR with good clinical outcome, and provides a higher and almost complete level of reflux resolution after first injection compared with Deflux.

Combination of calcium hydroxyapatite and autologous blood for endoscopic treatment of vesicoureteral reflux in children

OBJECTIVE

To report the results of endoscopic correction of vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) with concomitant injection of pure calcium hydroxyapatite (CaHA) and autologous blood.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Records of patients who underwent endoscopic correction of VUR using concomitant injection of CaHA and autologous blood from 2008 through 2010 were retrospectively reviewed. Data regarding patients' demographics, preoperative VUR grades, febrile urinary tract infections, complications of procedure, postoperative VUR grades and cure rates were collected. Voiding cystourethrography was performed 3 months postoperatively.

RESULTS

Total number of 23 children (9 girls and 14 boys) with 40 refluxing ureters were included. The mean age of children was 1.9 ± 0.97 (SD) years. Reflux grades were II to IV in 14, 11 and 15 renal refluxing units (RRUs), respectively. The mean follow-up period was 44 months. VUR was successfully treated in 87.5% of RRUs after three injections. Significant statistical difference was found between VUR grades before and after the first, second and third injections (p < 0.001, p = 0.001 and p = 0.011, respectively). Moreover, there was a significant difference between primary reflux grade and treatment success (p = 0.031). Febrile UTI was resolved in 85% of patients (17 of 20 patients with febrile UTI) after endoscopic treatment which shows significant improvement (p < 0.001). The procedure was uneventful in all patients, and no obstruction was reported during the follow-up period.

CONCLUSION

Concomitant injection of pure CaHA without any additives (hyaluronic acid, etc.) and autologous blood can be an effective, repeatable and cost-benefit approach for the management of children suffering VUR with a success rate of 87.5% after three injections.

The influence of ureteral orifice configuration on the success rate of endoscopic treatment of vesicoureteral reflux

Background:

To investigate the effect of polyacrylate polyalcohol copolymer (Vantris) injection for the correction of VUR in children according to ureteral orifice shape and VUR grade.

Materials and Methods:

Forty children (29 girls and 11 boys) with 61 renal refluxing units (RRU) and primary VUR underwent endoscopic correction of their reflux, using Vantris. Under general anesthesia, routine cystoscopy was performed and ureteral orifice configuration and dynamic hydro distention grade were determined. The injection technique was STING, HIT or a combination of them. Ultrasound scan was performed one and 3 months after injection and radionuclide cystography (RNC) was performed 3 months after the operation.

Results:

The mean volume of injected Vantris was 0.62 cc. Reflux was corrected in 52 (85.2%) of the 61 RRU after single injection and this equates reflux correction in 37 of the 40 patients. No significant correlation was observed between ureteral orifice shape and VUR correction rate.

Conclusions:

Our results showed that there was no correlation between the ureteral orifice configuration and the success rate of endoscopic surgery for VUR in short term.

Endoscopic treatment of vesicoureteral reflux in children with subureteral dextranomer/hyaluronic acid injection: a single-centre, 7-year experience

BACKGROUND

The goals of medical intervention in patients with vesicoureteral reflux are to allow normal renal growth, prevent infections and pyelonephritis, and prevent renal failure. We present our experience with endoscopic treatment of vesicoureteral reflux in children by subureteral dextranomer/hyaluronic acid copolymer injection.

METHODS

Under cystoscopic guidance, dextranomer/hyaluronic acid copolymer underneath the intravesical portion of the ureter in a subureteral or submucosal location was injected in patients undergoing endoscopic correction of vesicoureteral reflux.

RESULTS

A total of 282 patients (120 boys and 162 girls) underwent the procedure. There were 396 refluxed ureters altogether. The mean age of patients was 4.9 years. The mean overall follow-up period was 44 months. Among the 396 ureters treated, 76% were cured with a single injection. A second and third injection raised the cure rate to 93% and 94%, respectively. Twenty-two (6%) ureters failed all 3 injections, and were converted to open surgery.

CONCLUSION

Endoscopic treatment of vesicoureteral reflux can be recommended as a first-line therapy for most cases of vesicoureteral reflux, because of the short hospital stay, absence of complications and the high success rate.

Endoscopic bulking materials for the treatment of vesicoureteral reflux: a review of our 20 years of experience and review of the literature

Purpose. We reviewed our 20 years of experience and the current literature regarding the long-term outcome of endoscopic treatment of vesicoureteric reflux (VUR) using the different tissue bulking substances with a special emphasis on the long-term efficacy. Material and Methods. Our own experience and the current literature on the long-term results after endoscopic treatment using various bulking agents were reviewed. Results. Short-term data following endoscopic treatment of VUR is similar to the various substances and comparable in the majority of the series to the success rate following open surgery. Recently, a relatively high recurrence rate was noticed especially with the use of dextranomer hyaluronic acid (Dx/HA) as a tissue augmenting material which raises the need for further search for alternative substances. Conclusions. Unfortunately, there is a significant shortage of evidence-based literature on the long-term followup after endoscopic correction of reflux with various substances. No doubt, there is a high recurrence rate during long-term followup after Dx/HA injection, and there is probably lack of proper evaluation regarding the long-term efficacy of other bulking materials. These facts demand long-term close observation and long-term studies beyond the routine protocols following endoscopic treatment of VUR and the correct parental counseling upon the endoscopic correction.