Objective versus subjective outcome measures of biofeedback: what really matters?

The effect of biofeedback on nonneurological dysfunctional voiding in children: A meta-analysis and systematic review

OBJECTIVE

This study was conducted to investigate the effect of biofeedback (BF) on the rehabilitation of children with nonneurological dysfunctional voiding (NDV).

METHODS

RCTs were retrieved from various databases (published from inception to February 29, 2024). The effects of the BF and non-BF treatments were compared. A random-effects model was used to evaluate the combined data.

RESULTS

Meta-analysis revealed that BF increased the maximum urinary flow rate (SMD = 3.78, 95% CI 1.33∼6.22), improved urination time (SMD = 5.88, 95% CI 3.75∼8.01), and reduced the postvoid residual (SMD = -19.18, 95% CI -27.03∼-11.33) and urinary tract infection incidence (RR = 0.43, 95% CI 0.21∼0.87). Electromyogram activity (RR = 0.46, 95% CI 0.25∼0.84) and abnormal urination patterns (RR = 0.51, 95% CI 0.35∼0.74) improved, with effects persisting for more than 1 year. However, the effect of BF on the mean urinary flow rate in children with NDV was significant only after 1 year of follow-up (SMD = 1.90, 95% CI 0.87∼2.92).

CONCLUSION

Existing evidence indicates that BF can enhance urinary parameters and patterns in children with NDV. However, its effectiveness in addressing constipation, daytime urinary incontinence, and nocturnal urinary incontinence is not substantial. High-quality randomized controlled trials can offer additional insights.

The role of interferential current electrical stimulation in pediatric urology: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials

Background

In recent years, interferential current (IFC) electrical stimulation has been studied as a novel treatment for various lower urinary tract dysfunctions in children. As the findings of multiple studies may vary, we aimed to evaluate the current view on IFC in pediatric urology problems based on the findings of randomized clinical trials (RCTs).

Methods

We performed a systematic search in the Embase, Medline, and SCOPUS databases in accordance with the latest Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Eligible studies comprised studies evaluating IFC for lower urinary tract problems in children. The studies' quality was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias (RoB) tool 2.

Results

A total of 125 articles were initially obtained, among which 40 articles were duplicates. There were six eligible RCTs with an overall low RoB. All subjects underwent 10-18 sessions of treatment. The outcomes measured consisted of the alleviation of symptoms and urodynamic parameters. The trials reported that 61-90% of patients responded positively to the treatment. Both IFC and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation generated improvements in the subjects. However, overall the IFC group showed better immediate and short-term improvement.

Conclusion

IFC is a promising therapy for bladder dysfunction and enuresis in children. More comparative RCTs are required in the future to quantitatively determine the superiority of IFC to other alternatives. The safety aspects of the treatment should also be studied further before it can be used in a clinical setting as the standard and protocol for children are still unclear.

The role of bladder function in the pathogenesis and treatment of urinary tract infections in toilet-trained children

Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are a common reason for referral to pediatric specialists and the risk profile of these children is influenced by age, sex, and underlying urinary tract abnormalities. UTIs in toilet-trained children represent a different entity than confirmed, febrile UTIs that occur in infants, impacted by suboptimal bladder habits, bladder dysfunction, constipation, or a combination of these factors. A comprehensive literature search was conducted using PubMed and MEDLINE and search terms included recurrent UTI, VUR, bladder and bowel dysfunction (BBD), constipation, lower urinary tract symptoms, and voiding dysfunction. Common presenting symptoms of UTI in children include fever (> 38 °C) with or without "traditional" lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) such as dysuria, malodorous urine, frequency, urgency, and incontinence. However, many infections in older children are afebrile episodes-consisting primarily of LUTS-which may or may not be confirmed with biochemical and/or microbiological evidence. Therefore, when evaluating toilet-trained children with recurrent UTIs, it is paramount to consider dysfunctional elimination as an underlying cause, diagnose, and treat it prior to indicating surgical options, even in the presence of VUR or other anatomical abnormalities. Although the impact of bladder function on the risk of infections is important, so is the accurate diagnosis and initial evaluation. This review article will focus on an often overlooked yet critical factor: the impact of bladder function, particularly for toilet-trained children, as well as the importance of implementing bladder training strategies, aggressive management of constipation, and pharmacological management as necessary.

Traditional Biofeedback vs. Pelvic Floor Physical Therapy-Is One Clearly Superior?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Pelvic floor physical therapy is a worldwide accepted therapy that has been exclusively used to manage many pelvic floor disorders in adults and children. The aim of this review is to suggest to clinicians an updated understanding of this therapeutic approach in management of children with non-neuropathic voiding dysfunction.

RECENT FINDINGS

Today, pelvic floor muscle training through biofeedback is widely used as a part of a voiding retraining program aiming to help children with voiding dysfunction which is caused by pelvic floor overactivity. Biofeedback on its own, without a pelvic floor training component, is not an effective treatment. Biofeedback is an adjunct to the pelvic floor training. In the current review, we develop the role of pelvic floor physical therapy in management of children with non-neuropathic voiding dysfunction and compare it with biofeedback therapy alone.

Pelvic floor biofeedback therapy in children: Assessment of symptom scores in responders and non-responders

INTRODUCTION

Pelvic Floor Biofeedback Therapy (PFBT) can be an effective treatment for pediatric lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS). Due to differing perceptions of efficacy and practice patterns, we sought to further evaluate PFBT in our practice. We hypothesized that PFBT results in quiescence of EMG activity during voiding and improves questionnaire scores in patients with LUTS.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed all patients undergoing PFBT and refined the analysis to females ≥6 years old with ≥2 sessions with completed voiding questionnaires pre- and post-treatment, active EMG during voiding, with non-neurogenic urinary tract complaints refractory to standard urotherapy. Validated Bladder Bowel Dysfunction (BBD) questionnaires were collected at each visit. Quiescence of EMG activity and changes in BBD score were the primary outcomes.

RESULTS

229 patients underwent ≥1 PFBT session, of which 64 females ≥6 years of age with ≥2 PFBT sessions and completed pre and post PFBT voiding questionnaires were identified. In this group, mean age at PFBT start was 10.1 (6.2-17.0). Patients completed 3.1 sessions (2-6). No difference was seen in post-void residual (PVR) between first and last session (23.8 vs 22.6 mL, P = 0.55). Median questionnaire score decreased from 18 (4-42) before to 13 (2-28) following PFBT (P < 0.0001). Responders, characterized by silencing of the EMG after PFBT, occurred in 31% (20/64). Non-responders were younger (P = 0.007) with higher pre-PFBT questionnaire scores.

CONCLUSION

The use of PFBT appears to result in a significant reduction in symptom scores, though quiescence of EMG was observed following therapy in less than 1/3 of patients.

Animated versus non-animated biofeedback therapy for dysfunctional voiding treatment: Does it change the outcome?

PURPOSE

The aim of this study is to evaluate and compare the effectiveness of animated vs. non-animated biofeedback therapy in the treatment of dysfunctional voiding (DV) in the pediatric age group.

METHODS

In this study, children with DV were randomly assigned for animated and non-animated biofeedback therapy. Age, voiding dysfunction symptom scores (VDSS), urinary ultrasound and uroflowmetry parameters such as electromyography (EMG) activity, voided volumes, post voiding residual urine volume (PVR) and maximum flow rate (Qmax) were evaluated. At the end of treatment, clinical success was regarded as the cessation of EMG activity during voiding, resolution of symptoms (reduction in VDSS, frequency, intermittency, urgency and incontinence), and improvements in uroflowmetry parameters.

RESULTS

A total of 40 children were included in the study. There were 20 children in the non-animated group (16 girls, 4 boys; mean age: 10.5±3.2years) and 20 children in the animated group (15 girls, 5 boys; mean age: 9.5±3.63years). Patients received a mean of 5.2±1.9 sessions in both groups. Cessation of pelvic muscle activity on EMG was 75% in the non-animated group and 90% in the animated group (p=0.407). Reduction in VDSS was clinically significant in both groups (p=0.001 for both). There was no significant difference between the clinical success rates of the nonanimated and animated groups (80% vs. 70% respectively, p=0.125). PVR decreased by 68% in the non-animated group (p=0.015) while a 60% decrease was observed in the animated group (p=0.001).

CONCLUSION

In our study, there was no difference between animated and non-animated biofeedback therapy in terms of clinical success rates.

TYPE OF STUDY

Prospective comparative study LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II.

Murine social stress results in long lasting voiding dysfunction

Repeated exposure to social stress shifts the voiding phenotype in male mice leading to bladder wall remodeling and is associated with increased expression of the stress neuropeptide, corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) in Barrington's nucleus neurons. In these studies, we set out to determine if the voiding phenotype could recover upon removal from the stressor. Male mice were exposed for 1h daily to an aggressor and the voiding phenotype was assessed at one month followed by randomization to three groups. One group underwent immediate sacrifice. Two groups were allowed a one month recovery from the social stress exposure with or without the addition of fluoxetine (1.2mg/ml) in their drinking water and repeat voiding patterns were measured prior to sacrifice. Social stress significantly increased bladder mass, bladder mass corrected for body weight, voided volumes, and decreased urinary frequency. The abnormal voiding phenotype persisted after a 1month recovery with no effect from the addition of fluoxetine. CRF mRNA in Barrington's nucleus was increased by social stress and remained elevated following recovery with no effect from the addition of fluoxetine. The mRNA and protein expression for the alpha 1 chains of type 1 and type III collagen was unchanged across all groups suggesting that changes in the extracellular matrix of the bladder are not responsible for the voiding phenotype. This persisting voiding dysfunction correlates with the persistent elevation of CRF mRNA expression in Barrington's nucleus.

The effectiveness of biofeedback therapy in children with monosymptomatic enuresis resistant to desmopressin treatment

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effect of biofeedback therapy on children with desmopressin- resistant primary monosymptomatic enuresis (MsE).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The study comprised both retrospective and prospective sections. A total of 262 medical files of patients who were diagnosed as enuresis between November 2012 and January 2015 were retrospectively screened. Patients with neuropathic bladder, daytime voiding problems, anatomical pathology and enuresis-related diseases were excluded from the study. The demographic data and family characteristics of 29 children with desmopressin- resistantprimary MsE were recorded. After biofeedback treatment patients whose frequency of enuretic episodes decrease by more than 50% were included in the successful biofeedback treatment group (SBTG), while other patients were categorized in the unsuccessful biofeedback treatment group (USGBT). The outcomes of uroflowmetry, voided volume, postvoiding residue (PVR) and total bladder volume/age-adjusted normal bladder capacity (TBV/NBC) were recorded before and at the sixth month of the treatment.

RESULTS

The mean age of 29 patients included in the study was 9.14±3.07 (6-15) years. Of patients, 16 were male (55.2%) and 13 were female (44.8%). Before biofeedback treatment the frequency of enuresis was 25.1±5.76 days/month, while after treatment this was calculated as 8.52±10.07 days/month. After treatment 8 patients (28.6%) achieved complete dryness. Twenty patients (69%), benefited from biofeedback (SBTG), while there were 9 patients (31%) in the USBTG group. There was no significant difference between the SBTG and USBTG groups in terms of age, body mass index and sex. The average bladder capacity of the patients increased from 215 mL to 257 mL after biofeedback treatment (p<0.001). The TBV/NBC value before treatment was 0.66, while after treatment it was 0.77 (p<0.001). There was a statistically significant difference between the SBTG and USBTG groups in terms of presence of MsE in mother, and both parents (p=0.001, p=0.016, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Biofeedback therapy is a safe, simple, and minimally invasive treatment modality in children with MsE resistant to desmopressin treatment. This treatment, which was found to increase total bladder capacity, may be recommended for children with MsE when conventional desmopressin treatment fails.

Voiding Dysfunction: What Can Radiologists Tell Patients and Pediatric Urologists?

OBJECTIVE

Imaging children with dysfunctional voiding remains a challenge because 98% of these children have normal anatomy. Identifying the 1-2% of children who do have an anatomic basis for incontinence is important; this article focuses on how pediatric urologists use imaging for the evaluation of patients with this condition.

CONCLUSION

Imaging a patient with dysfunctional voiding can provide findings that will allow an accurate diagnosis and lead to optimal management. The key for the pediatric urologist is using imaging studies judiciously because the diagnostic yield is low. If every patient with dysfunctional voiding who presents to the clinic undergoes imaging, there will be little gain. Understanding in which patients to try imaging sooner versus trying medical and behavioral management first is a function of experience.