The natural history of semen parameters in untreated asymptomatic adolescent varicocele patients: A retrospective cohort study

"Management of andrological disorders from childhood and adolescence to transition age: guidelines from the Italian Society of Andrology and Sexual Medicine (SIAMS) in collaboration with the Italian Society for Pediatric Endocrinology and Diabetology (SIEDP)-Part-1"

PURPOSE

Andrological pathologies in the adulthood are often the results of conditions that originate during childhood and adolescence and sometimes even during gestation and neonatal period. Unfortunately, the reports in the literature concerning pediatric andrological diseases are scares and mainly concerning single issues. Furthermore, no shared position statement are so far available.

METHODS

The Italian Society of Andrology and Sexual Medicine (SIAMS) commissioned an expert task force involving the Italian Society of Pediatric Endocrinology and Diabetology (SIEDP) to provide an updated guideline on the diagnosis and management of andrological disorders from childhood and adolescence to transition age. Derived recommendations were based on the grading of recommendations, assessment, development, and evaluation (GRADE) system.

RESULTS

A literature search of articles in English for the term "varicoceles", "gynecomastia", "fertility preservation", "macroorchidism", "precocious puberty" and "pubertal delay" has been performed. Three major aspects for each considered disorder were assessed including diagnosis, clinical management, and treatment. Recommendations and suggestions have been provided for each of the mentioned andrological disorders.

CONCLUSIONS

These are the first guidelines based on a multidisciplinary approach that involves important societies related to the field of andrological medicine from pediatric to transition and adult ages. This fruitful discussion allowed for a general agreement on several recommendations and suggestions to be reached, which can support all stakeholders in improving andrological and general health of the transitional age.

Successful Adolescent Varicocelectomy Improves Total Motile Sperm Count

BACKGROUND

Management of the adolescent varicocele focuses on optimizing fertility potential, but to date there is limited data on the success of varicocelectomy on optimizing semen parameters for individual adolescent patients. We reviewed our database of over 1600 adolescent varicocele patients to find those with pre- and postoperative semen analyses to determine the impact of varicocele correction.

METHODS

15 Tanner stage V patients with unilateral clinically apparent left-sided with pre- and postoperative semen analyses were identified. Mixed models were used to compare semen parameters pre- and post-varicocelectomy in patients with successful management.

RESULTS

Complete elimination of the varicocele was achieved in 12/15 (80%) patients. Three patients had persistent varicocele (with down-grading in two) and declined further intervention. Median time between pre- and postoperative semen analyses was 24.2 months. For those with successful varicocele correction, total motile sperm count (TMSC) improved in all but one (Figure 1), with an average increase of 44.0 million (95% CI: 18.7-69.3) in post-varicocelectomy analyses compared to pre-varicocelectomy (p = 0.0016). Mean percent improvement was 649.2%. It went from abnormal to normal (≥20 million/cc) in 55.6% (5/9). For the three patients with persistent varicocele, one had improved TMSC from abnormal to normal range, one had worsening within normal range, and one had effectively no change.

CONCLUSION

Successful correction of adolescent varicocele may improve TMSC. In over half of our institution's cases, an abnormal value normalized. Surgical intervention may be considered for adolescent varicoceles associated with abnormal semen parameters.

LEVELS OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

TYPE OF STUDY

Treatment study.

Semen Parameters Changes in Adolescents With Clinical Varicocele after Magnified Subinguinal Varicocelectomy: A Prospective Controlled Study

BACKGROUND

Previously, we highlighted the benefits of magnified subinguinal varicocelectomy over conservative treatment on the semen of a small group of adolescents with varicoceles. In this report, we presented changes of semen parameters of 47 adolescents who underwent magnified subinguinal varicocelectomy (MSV) and followed-up for 6 months.

METHODS

The present prospective controlled study was conducted on 47 adolescents with varicocele who underwent MSV and were followed up for 6 months. In addition, age and sex-matched patients were added as control group. The primary outcome of this study was to assess the postoperative change in semen analysis parameters.

RESULTS

A significant increase in sperm volume from 2.5 (1.9-3) to 3.2 (2.6-4) mL at the end of the sixth month of follow-up. Likewise, the sperm count increased from 10.8 (3.51-21.6) to 20.3 (9.6-35) million. Notably, the percentage of rapid and slow sperms increased significantly from a median of 5% (0%-10%) and 15% (10 -20%) to a median of 10% (5%-15%) and 17.5% (15%-25%), respectively. The percentage of sperm with progressive movement increased from 35% (30%-40%) to 59% (45%-69%). The vitality of the sperms increased significantly as well. While the percentage of sperms with abnormal morphology decreased significantly at the end of follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Our findings support the safety and efficacy of MSV in patients with clinically detectable varicocele. MSV has improved the semen parameters of the included patients, including sperm motility, volume, count, and total progressive motility, which may positively impact their fertility potential.

Peak retrograde flow a potential objective management tool to identify young adults with varicocele 'at risk' for a high sperm DNA fragmentation

INTRODUCTION

Determining which patients are negatively affected by varicocele would enable clinicians to better select those men who would benefit most from surgery. Since conventional semen parameters, have been limited in their ability to evaluate the negative effects of varicocele on fertility, specialized laboratory tests have emerged.

OBJECTIVE

To identify clinical and ultrasound parameters (including PRF) which would negatively influence standard and functional semen variables in young adults with a varicocele.

DESIGN

Prospective, cross-sectional observational study.

SETTING

Antwerp University Hospital, Belgium.

PATIENT(S)

Young volunteers between 16 and 26 years, Tanner 5, were recruited.

INTERVENTION(S)

Every participant had a scrotal ultrasound to calculate testicular volumes. If a varicocele was present, the grade, vein diameter, peak retrograde flow (PRF) in supine position and spontaneous reflux in standing position were measured. All participants provided a semen sample. Standard semen parameters were analyzed and sperm DNA fragmentation.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Of all clinical and ultrasound parameters tested, PRF was an objective tool identifying young adults with a varicocele. PRF was highlighted by the prevalence of SDF, both in the total and vital fractions of the spermatozoa, providing opportunities to manage such 'at-risk' adolescents/young adults.

RESULT(S)

Total SDF was significantly increased in grade 3 varicocele compared to grade 1 and 2 but no significant difference with vital SDF or standard descriptive semen parameters was seen. Total and vital SDF on the other hand were significantly increased when PRF was above 38.4 cm/s. Standard semen analysis showed no difference with PRF as an independent predictor. Testicular atrophy index, varicocele vein diameter and spontaneous reflux revealed no significant differences in both the descriptive and functional semen variables.

DISCUSSION

Descriptive semen parameters showed no significant difference between the non-varicocele controls and the varicocele group with low and high PRF. Increased PRF negatively influenced sperm quality via increased DNA fragmentation both in the total as in the vital fractions of the semen.

CONCLUSION(S)

Of all clinical and ultrasound parameters tested, PRF was an objective non-invasive tool to identify varicocele patients at risk for a high SDF.

Management and Treatment of Varicocele in Children and Adolescents: An Endocrinologic Perspective

Pediatric varicocele has an overall prevalence of 15%, being more frequent as puberty begins. It can damage testicular function, interfering with Sertoli cell proliferation and hormone secretion, testicular growth and spermatogenesis. Proper management has a pivotal role for future fertility preservation. The aim of this review was to discuss the diagnosis, management and treatment of childhood and adolescent varicocele from an endocrinologic perspective, illustrating the current evidence of the European Society of Pediatric Urology (ESPU), the European Association of Urology (EAU), the American Urological Association (AUA) and the American Society for Reproductive Medicine (ASRM) scientific societies. According to the ASRM/ESPU/AUA practice committee, the treatment of adolescent varicocele is indicated in the case of decreased testicular volume or sperm abnormalities, while it is contraindicated in subclinical varicocele. The recent EAS/ESPU meta-analysis reports that moderate evidence exists on the benefits of varicocele treatment in children and adolescents in terms of testicular volume and sperm concentration increase. No specific phenotype in terms of testicular volume cut-off or peak retrograde flow (PRF) is indicated. Based on current evidence, we suggest that conservative management may be suggested in patients with PRF < 30 cm/s, testicular asymmetry < 10% and no evidence of sperm and hormonal abnormalities. In patients with 10-20% testicular volume asymmetry or 30 < PRF ≤ 38 cm/s or sperm abnormalities, careful follow-up may ensue. In the case of absent catch-up growth or sperm recovery, varicocele repair should be suggested. Finally, treatment can be proposed at the initial consultation in painful varicocele, testicular volume asymmetry ≥ 20%, PRF > 38 cm/s, infertility and failure of testicular development.

Surprising interobserver and intra-observer variability in pediatric testicular ultrasound volumes

INTRODUCTION

Testicular volume (TV) can be obtained by either scrotal ultrasound (SU) or orchidometer. Scrotal ultrasound allows for a more objective measurement; however, the interobserver and intra-observer variability of TV measurements has not been rigorously studied.

OBJECTIVE

The authors measured intra-observer and interobserver variability of SU TV measurements in pediatric patients to assess the reliability and reproducibility of SU. Special attention was paid to how often a 20% discrepancy in TV was noted as this has previously been utilized as an indication for varicocelectomy.

DESIGN

Patients with an indication for SU or undergoing an ultrasound for another reason were prospectively recruited. Two different urologic specific ultrasound technicians (A and B) performed SU to assess interobserver variability. A second measurement was taken by technician A within 90 days to assess intra-observer variability (A vs A1). The technicians were blinded to other ultrasound results.

RESULTS

Fourteen patients (28 testes, 56 volume measurements) were included in the intra-observer group and 17 patients (34 testes, 68 volume measurements) in the interobserver group. The mean time to repeat intra-observer ultrasound measurements (range) was 46 days (23-84). Mean age (range) in the intra-observer group was 14.3 years (11-19) and 14.1 years (11-19) in the interobserver group. Indication for ultrasound was varicocele (n = 6), scrotal pain (4), hydronephrosis (3), hydrocele (2), epididymal cyst (2), posterior urethral valves (1), and testis asymmetry (1). Utilizing Bland-Altman analysis and plots, variability was seen in both intra-observer and interobserver measurements. The mean values for testicular sizes for technician A and technician B were 13.0 ± 9.7 cm³ vs 13.8 ± 9.9 cm³, respectively. The mean values for TV measurement for technician A's first and second measurements (A, A1) were 14.3 ± 9.7 cm³ and 14.8 ± 8.9 cm³, respectively. An errant 20% difference in TV measurements for the same testis was seen in 25% (7 of 28) of intra-observer measurements and 35% (12 of 34) of interobserver measurements. These 20% differences were more common with a lower body mass index (odds ratio, OR = 0.74, p = 0.01) in the interobserver group, and lower TV was a predictor in the intra-observer group (OR: 0.82, p = 0.009).

CONCLUSIONS

Variability exists in both interobserver and intra-observer measurements of TV by dedicated urologic ultrasonographers, and greater than 20% of differences in measured TV in same testicles occurred in over 25% of cases. Caution should be exercised in basing operative decisions and scientific studies on limited measurements of TV.

Treating varicocele in 2018: current knowledge and treatment options

PURPOSE

Varicocele is defined as a state of varicosity and tortuosity of the pampiniform plexus around the testis caused by retrograde blood flow through the internal spermatic vein. The prevalence of clinically relevant varicocele ranges from 5 to 20% in the male population and is often associated with infertility and reduction of sperm quality. In this review, the pathophysiology and clinical aspects of varicocele are reviewed along with therapeutic options and treatment effects on sperm parameters and fertility both in adult and in pediatric/adolescent subjects.

METHODS

We conducted a Medline and a PubMed search from 1965 to 2018 to identify publications related to varicocele clinical aspects, treatment procedures and treatment outcomes. Keywords used for the search were: "varicocele", "varicocelectomy", "sclerotherapy", "male infertility", "subfertility", and "semen abnormalities".

RESULTS

Data from a large number of studies in adolescent and adult males indicate that varicocele correction improves semen parameters in the majority of patients, reducing oxidative stress and improving sperm nuclear DNA integrity either with surgical or percutaneous approach.

CONCLUSIONS

Varicocele repair seems to represent a cost-effective therapeutic option for all males (both adolescent and adults) with a clinical varicocele in the presence of testicular hypotrophy, worsening sperm alterations or infertility. On the other hand, some investigators questioned the role of varicocelectomy in the era of assisted reproduction. Thus, a better understanding of the pathophysiology of varicocele-associated male subfertility is of paramount importance to elucidating the deleterious effects of varicocele on spermatogenesis and possibly formulating new treatment strategies.

Best practice in the diagnosis and treatment of varicocele in children and adolescents

A varicocele is an abnormal dilation of the pampiniform plexus of veins in the scrotum which begins at puberty in approximately 15% of males. Although common in the general population and often asymptomatic, varicoceles are associated with gonadal dysfunction including testicular atrophy, infertility, and hypogonadism in a subset of men diagnosed later in life. Because of the high prevalence and uncertain pathogenesis, definitive management guidelines for varicoceles diagnosed in the pediatric and adolescent population remain poorly defined. The varicocele is the most common etiology of male factor infertility, and treatment in the pediatric and adolescent population may improve semen quality and improve fecundity in adulthood. Evaluation of the pediatric and adolescent varicocele should include history, physical exam, and measurement of testicular volume with orchidometer or ultrasound. Testicular volume differentials and peak retrograde flow on Doppler ultrasonography are important factors in risk stratification of the pediatric varicocele population. Semen analysis and reproductive endocrine assessment should also be considered as part of the workup for adolescent patients. A variety of treatment approaches exist for varicocele, and while the microsurgical subinguinal approach is the gold standard for the adult population, it has yet to be confirmed as superior for the adolescent population. Referral to an andrologist for the adolescent patient with varicocele should be considered in equivocal cases. While active treatment of varicocele in the pediatric and adolescent population is controversial, it is clear that some untreated patients will suffer symptoms later in life, while overtreatment remains a concern for this large, vulnerable population. Therefore, surveillance strategies and improved accuracy in diagnosis of clinically important pediatric varicoceles prompting treatment are needed in the future.

Varicocele Management Strategies and Resulting Paternity Rates in a Cohort of Young Adults

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the paternity rate in a large cohort of asymptomatic adult varicocele patients undergoing nonsurgical management and surgery.

METHODS

The study population included 1845 men with varicocele and 9286 healthy controls. All data were retrospectively obtained from the Israeli Defense Forces medical database. Patients were divided according to the management strategy: 1758 (95.2%) were followed up nonsurgically, 63 (3.4%) had preventive surgery (patients without known infertility), and 24 (1.4%) had secondary surgery (patients with varicocele and primary infertility) as young adults. The primary outcome was the live birth rate.

RESULTS

The live birth rate was similar in the preventive surgery and control groups. Both preventive surgery and control groups had higher live birth rate than the nonsurgical group. Finally, the secondary surgery group had the lowest live birth rate of all groups.

CONCLUSION

Preventive surgery for asymptomatic varicocele provides similar fertility outcomes to control groups, whereas nonsurgical strategy provides inferior outcomes and may be overutilized.

Varicocele

N/A

Current Issues in Adolescent Varicocele: Pediatric Urological Perspectives

While varicocele is the most common cause of surgically correctable infertility in adult males, with repair resulting in improved semen parameters in 60% to 80% of men and a higher likelihood of conception in up to 60% of men, the rationale for varicocele repair in the pediatric population is less clear. Additionally, prepubertal varicoceles are much less common and their management is controversial. Adolescents with a varicocele are often in the midst of a progressive disease process. Despite the high prevalence of varicocele and its association with progressive disease processes, the indications for adolescent varicocele repair and the effects thereof on paternity have been persistently challenging to study. This review will briefly present some of the current issues regarding adolescent varicocele from a pediatric urological point of view, including the evaluation of adolescent varicocele, the optimal surgical indications, the optimal choice of surgical intervention to be performed, and outcomes.

Treatment of varicocele in children and adolescents: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

The prevalence of varicoceles is as high as 15% in children and adolescents. Optimal management of varicoceles has not been consolidated. Options include observation, radiological intervention, or surgical varicocelectomy.

OBJECTIVE

Herein, we aim to assess the outcomes of radiological and surgical interventions for varicocele in children and adolescents evaluated by RCTs.

STUDY DESIGN

The study subjects were children and adolescents up to 21 years old, diagnosed with varicocele and allocated to receive either "surgical or radiological intervention" or "no treatment".

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We searched MEDLINE and EMBASE (Ovid platform), Web of Science, CINAHL, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Google Scholar, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform for RCTs reporting on varicocele treatment in children and adolescents up to June 23, 2016. Only RCTs with patients aged under 21 years were included. Main outcomes of interest included changes in testicular size, semen analysis parameters, surgical adverse events and failures.

RESULTS

Nine eligible studies were included in the systematic review. Meta-analysis based on available outcomes data demonstrated an improvement in testicular volume (mean difference 3.18 mL, 95% CI 1.94-4.42) and in sperm count (mean difference 25.54 × 10⁶/mL, 95% CI 12.84-38.25) in patients who underwent radiological or surgical treatment compared with conservative management.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on current available randomized controlled trials, there is low to moderate level of evidence that radiological or surgical treatment of adolescent varicocele is associated with improved testicular size/growth and sperm concentration. The ultimate effects on fertility and paternity rates are not known.

Update on the novel management and future paternity situation in adolescents with varicocele

Varicocele is a progressive disease, and the incidence of varicocele and varicocele related testicular hypotrophy increases with puberty. This review updates novel management and future paternity potential in adolescents with varicocele. Main goal of treatment of the adolescent varicoceles is preservation of fertility. Current recommendations for adolescent varicocele repair are testicular hypotrophy (>2 mL or >20%) on the affected side and/or impaired spermatogenesis in the post-pubertal period. The best treatment modality for adolescent varicocele should include elimination of the varicocele with lower complication rates. Microsurgical varicocelectomy techniques have been shown to result in fewer recurrences and postoperative complications than conventional varicocelectomy in adolescents. We conducted a meta-analysis, including 2 studies with the control groups, and reporting paternity situation after varicocele treatment. In this meta-analysis, varicocele repair increases paternity rate 2.42 times with a p value of 0.000. Adolescents with varicocele and their families should be counselled in the light of these findings.

The Dilemma of Adolescent Varicoceles: Do They Really Have to Be Repaired?

The primary indication for varicocele repair in adults, that of failed paternity, must be substituted in the adolescent population with surrogate parameters of testicular size differential and semen analysis. Making recommendations based on these two parameters is incredibly difficult because studies often have contradictory findings, different patient populations, and lack of long-term follow up of the key endpoint, paternity. Therefore, it is not a surprise that recommendations for adolescent varicocele repair are general (with some exceptions) and necessarily so because of limitations in quality of evidence. Apart from pain, all indications for varicocele repair in adolescence remain controversial. This highlights the most important task for future studies: to prevent pediatric urologists from allowing a potentially damaging process to go untreated, while at the same time avoiding unnecessary intervention on a highly prevalent condition.