Parasacral transcutaneous electrical neural stimulation (PTENS) once a week for the treatment of overactive bladder in children: A randomized controlled trial

At-home use of parasacral transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation for pediatric voiding dysfunction: a randomized controlled trial to assess its safety and feasibility

Introduction

Treating pediatric voiding dysfunction involves behavioral changes that require significant time or medications that are often avoided or discontinued due to side effects. Using parasacral transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (PTENS) has shown to have reasonable efficacy, but the safety and feasibility of its off-label use for pediatric voiding dysfunction are not well-established. Concerns have also been raised over treatment adherence. In-home therapy might improve adherence compared with office-based therapy; however, no studies have evaluated in-home feasibility to date. This study aims to assess the safety and feasibility of off-label use of PTENS for pediatric voiding dysfunction.

Materials and methods

A single-institution prospective, randomized controlled study was conducted from March 2019 to March 2020. Participants aged 6-18 years diagnosed with voiding dysfunction, overactive bladder, or urinary incontinence were eligible for the study. Those with known neurologic disorders, implanted electrical devices, anatomic lower urinary tract abnormality, and recurrent urinary tract infections and those taking bladder medications were excluded. Children with primary monosymptomatic nocturnal enuresis were also excluded due to previous work suggesting a lack of efficacy. Participants were randomly assigned to receive 12 weeks of urotherapy alone (control) or urotherapy plus at-home PTENS treatment. Families were contacted weekly to assess for adverse events (AEs) and treatment adherence. The primary and secondary outcomes were safety, defined as the absence of AEs and treatment adherence, respectively.

Results

A total of 30 eligible participants were divided into two groups, with 15 participants in each arm. The median age was 9.4 years (interquartile range: 7.7-10.6). In total, 60% were male. Baseline demographics and urotherapy compliance were similar between the two groups. With PTENS use, two AEs were reported, including mild pruritus at the pad site and discomfort when removing pads, while no AEs were noted in the control group. In total, 60% of patients completed three 30-min sessions per week, and all participants were able to complete treatment sessions for at least 10 weeks, involving 30 min of PTENS treatment each time.

Conclusion

This randomized controlled study confirms that at-home use of PTENS is feasible with reasonable treatment adherence and minimal AEs. Future collaborative, multi-institutional studies may better determine the efficacy of this treatment modality.

Agreement between the visual analogue scale (VAS) and the dysfunctional voiding scoring system (DVSS) in the post-treatment evaluation of electrical nerve stimulation in children and adolescents with overactive bladder

INTRODUCTION

Electrical nerve stimulation is one of the most commonly used and well-tolerated treatments for overactive bladder (OAB); however, different studies have used different instruments to assess patients' response to treatment.

OBJECTIVE

To analyze agreement between use of the visual analogue scale (VAS) and the Dysfunctional Voiding Scoring System (DVSS) for assessing improvement in urinary symptoms following electrical nerve stimulation treatment in children and adolescents with OAB.

STUDY DESIGN

A cross-sectional analytical study including children and adolescents of 4-17 years of age diagnosed with OAB who underwent 20 sessions of transcutaneous (TENS) or percutaneous (PENS) electrical nerve stimulation. The DVSS and the VAS were used to assess daytime urinary symptoms before and following treatment. While the DVSS was always applied by a physician, the VAS was applied separately by a physiotherapist and then by a physician. Treatment was considered successful when the DVSS score was zero and the VAS score was ≥90%. Correlations between post-treatment VAS and DVSS scores were evaluated using the kappa coefficient. The VAS scores evaluated by the different professionals were compared for agreement using intraclass correlation and the Bland-Altman plot.

RESULTS

Data from 49 cases were available for analysis. Of these, 27 (55.1%) were girls. Mean age was 7.1 ± 2.6 years. There was agreement between the two instruments used, the DVSS and the VAS, in 36/49 patients (73.5%), with a moderate Kappa of 0.44. There was moderate agreement between the VAS scores applied by the two different professionals.

DISCUSSION

imitations of the present study include the small sample size and the fact that the inter-observer evaluation was conducted following a single sequence, i.e. all the patients were first evaluated by the physiotherapist and then by the physician, which may have biased answers and the post-treatment VAS scores. Furthermore, although the child participated actively in completing the questionnaires, in cases of divergent answers, the questions were redirected to the responsible adult, and the final answer may not fully represent the patient's true situation.

CONCLUSION

The present study found moderate agreement between the DVSS and the VAS, and moderate agreement between VAS scores when the instrument was applied by two different professionals. Although both tools appear to be important, and possibly complementary, a DVSS score of zero precludes the need to apply the VAS.

Treatment for overactive bladder: A meta-analysis of tibial versus parasacral neuromodulation

BACKGROUND

The study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of parasacral neuromodulation (PNS) versus tibial nerve stimulation (TNS) for patients with overactive bladder (OAB).

METHODS

Databases including PubMed, Embase, clinicalTrial.gov, and Cochrane Library Central Register of Controlled Trials were systematically searched from January 1, 1999 to September 9, 2022. The improvements in a 3-day voiding diary were set as the primary outcomes. Then, the scores of overactive bladder-validated 8-question awareness tool (OAB-V8), King's health questionnaire (KHQ), and international consultation on incontinence questionnaire overactive bladder (ICIQ-OAB) were also evaluated.

RESULTS

Five articles (4 randomized controlled trials [RCTs] and 1 prospective study) including 255 OAB patients were enrolled. Two kinds of neuromodulations had similar performances in the micturition (mean difference [MD] = 0.26, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.51 to 1.04, P = .50), urgency episodes (MD = -0.16, 95% CI: -0.64 to 0.31, P = .50), incontinence episodes (MD = 0.09, 95% CI: -0.41 to 0.59, P = .72), as well as in the nocturia episodes (MD = 0.04, 95% CI: -0.45 to 0.52, P = .89). Furthermore, there was no difference regarding ICIQ-OAB scores (P = .83), KHQ (P = .91), and OAB-V8 scores (P = .83). Importantly, included studies reported no adverse events in the 2 groups.

CONCLUSION

TNS and PNS had similar effectiveness for the treatment of OAB, moreover, without any identified adverse events in both groups. However, well-designed RCTs are stilled needed to verify our results.

Effectiveness of a Practical, At-Home Regimen of Parasacral Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation in Pediatric Overactive Bladder

OBJECTIVE

To describe and evaluate efficacy of a more practical, at-home regimen of parasacral transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) for pediatric overactive bladder (OAB).

METHODS

We prospectively enrolled patients with OAB.

INCLUSION CRITERIA

age 5-13 years and willingness to try TENS.

EXCLUSION CRITERIA

urinary tract anatomic abnormalities, current use of OAB medications, neurologic condition, and elevated post-void residual. Patients were instructed to complete 20-minute sessions 2x/day for one month.

RESULTS

We enrolled 21 patients (3 male, 18 female; median age 9.9 years). We had complete VSS data on 17 patients and frequency-volume chart data on 12 patients. Median % of TENS sessions completed was 98%.

CONCLUSION

In our cohort of medically-refractory OAB pediatric patients, nearly half reported subjective improvement with our regimen, despite modest objective improvement. Our compliance rates suggest this regimen is practical but may be best used as an adjunct to other therapies.

Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation as add-on therapy in children receiving anticholinergics and/or mirabegron for refractory daytime urinary incontinence: A retrospective cohort study

AIMS

To investigate if children with daytime urinary incontinence (DUI) and overactive bladder (OAB) refractory to standard urotherapy and medicinal treatment, would experience improvement in symptoms after add-on treatment with transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS).

METHODS

Children were retrospectively enrolled from tertiary referral centers at Aarhus and Aalborg University Hospitals. All data were retrieved from the patients' journals. All children were prescribed TENS as an add-on treatment to the highest-tolerable dose of medicinal treatment in a standardized regime of 2 h a day for around 3 months. Primary endpoints were the number of wet days per week (WDPW) and incontinence episodes per day. Effect of treatment was defined as greater or equal to 50% reduction in the frequency of DUI episodes. Secondary endpoints were to establish predictive factors for the effect of treatment using logistic regression.

RESULTS

Seventy-six children diagnosed with DUI and OAB refractory to treatment with standard urotherapy and pharmacological treatment, at the age of 5-16 years were included from February 2017 to February 2020. A reduction in WDPW (from 6.31 [5.86-6.61] to 4.27 [3.45-4.90], p < 0.05) and incontinence episodes per day (from 2.45 [1.98-2.91] to 1.43 [1.07-1.80], p < 0.05) was observed. Twelve patients became completely dry. At 6 months follow-up, seven of the 12 complete responders had relapsed while five remained dry. A history of constipation before TENS was a predictor of poor treatment response (p = 0.016).

CONCLUSIONS

TENS as add-on to anticholinergic treatment seems effective in a number of children with treatment-refractory DUI.

Transcutaneous sacral electrical stimulation versus oxibutynin for the treatment of overactive bladder in children

BACKGROUND

Nowadays there is still no ideal treatment for paediatric overactive bladder. Initial management measures (urotherapy and constipation control), resolve 40% of cases. The second line of treatment in overactive bladder is anticholinergic drugs, above all oxybutynin. Although most patients improve with these therapies, the complete resolution rate is around 30-40%. Sacral transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation has recently emerged as a new alternative in the management of patients with refractory paediatric overactive bladder. However, only a few studies have been done to compare the effectiveness of this therapy versus conventional drugs.

OBJETIVE

The objective of the present study is to compare, in children with overactive bladder, the efficacy of the sacral transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation versus oxybutynin therapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a prospective and randomized study of patients with diagnosis of overactive bladder treated with sacral transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation versus oxybutynin, during the period July 2018-July 2020. Patients refractory to standard urotherapy and constipation management randomly received one of the therapeutic alternatives. Treatment was maintained for 6 months.

RESULTS

86 patients were included in the study: 40 patients received electrotherapy (group 1) and 46 patients received oxybutynin (group 2). Before starting the treatment assigned both groups were comparable related to the voiding symptomatology as well as the severity of the overactive bladder. Sacral transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation was significantly more effective than oxybutynin, with a higher percentage of complete resolution of symptoms in the management of paediatric overactive bladder.

VOIDING DIARY

All the parameters obtained with the voiding calendar significantly improved in both groups at the end of the treatment. The increase in MaVV was significantly higher in group-1.

DVISS (DYSFUNCTIONAL VOIDING AND INCONTINENCE SCORING SYSTEM)

We observed a progressive decrease in the mean score obtained in the DVISS questionnaire over time in both groups. This decrease was significantly higher in group-1 compared to group-2 (p < 0.005). The mean value obtained in the DVISS questionnaire in group-1 was 6 (interquartile range: 3-9) at the end of the treatment (lower than the diagnostic cut-off point for daytime condition in the DVISS, 8.5). In group-2, the mean value obtained in the DVISS questionnaire was 10 (interquartile range: 8.75-13.25), higher than the cut-off point.

COMPLICATIONS

A greater number of adverse effects was obtained in group-2 (26.1% versus 15%, p < 0.05). Constipation (n: 6, 10.9%), and abdominal pain (n: 2,4.3%) were the most frequent adverse effects in this group. The adverse events reported in group-1 were contact dermatitis (n: 1.2%) and fecal losses [2] or urgency [5].

CONCLUSION

Oxybutynin and sacral transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation are both effective therapies in the management of paediatric overactive bladder. However, electrotherapy has been shown to be a more effective therapy with a complete clinical resolution rate in a larger number of patients. Furthermore, the rate of adverse effects secondary to electrotherapy is significantly lower than those treated with oxybutynin.

Electrical nerve stimulation therapy in refractory primary monosymtomatic enuresis - A sistematic review

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the effect of electrical nerve stimulation on urinary symptoms in pediatric patients with monosymptomatic primary enuresis refractory to conventional treatment.

METHODS

Three databases (Medline, Embase, and Cochrane) were searched and 160 studies were identified by July 15, 2020. After establishing and applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria, a step-by-step analysis was performed using the title, abstract and full text. The Cochrane Collaboration Tool was then used to analyze the biases of the selected studies.

RESULTS

Of the 160 articles found, 03 were selected for this systematic review. In 02 studies there was a significant reduction in the number of wet nights/week after electrical nerve stimulation. Urodynamic pattern was evaluated in 01 study, with improvement of maximum cystometric capacity in the intervention group. About maximum voided volume, there was no improvement in 01 study, but in other, there was increase in the intervention group.

CONCLUSION

Electrical nerve stimulation might promote improvement in partial and total response scores over the number of dry nights, with no improvement in urodynamic parameters, and could be considered as an feasible option in the management of refractory monosymptomatic primary enuresis. However, it is worth emphasizing the need to conduct more RCTs with a larger sample for better evaluation of the role of neurostimulation.

Parasacral transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation in children with overactive bladder: comparison between sessions administered two and three times weekly

Purpose:

This study compares the results achieved following parasacral TENS administered using two different weekly schedules.

Materials and Methods:

Children of at least four years of age with a diagnosis of pure overactive bladder were included in this randomized clinical trial and treated with parasacral TENS (2 versus 3 sessions per week). All the participants also underwent standard urotherapy.

Results:

Sixteen children were included in the twice-weekly group and eighteen in the three times weekly group. There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups with respect to sex; however, there was a difference in age. There were no significant differences regarding complete resolution of urinary symptoms, with 8 children (50%) in the twice-weekly group and 11 children (61%) in the three times weekly group having their symptoms completely resolved (p=0.73). There was a significant difference in the DVSS score in both groups following TENS treatment compared to baseline (p=0.0001 for both groups), but not between groups. Evaluation of the bladder diary showed no difference between the groups before or after treatment.

Conclusion:

For children with overactive bladder who are unable to undergo parasacral TENS treatment three times weekly, the method can be administered successfully at twice-weekly sessions.

Comparing the outcomes of parasacral transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation for the treatment of lower urinary tract dysfunction in children: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

AIMS

Despite published evidence in recent decades suggesting improvement in lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) with the use of parasacral transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (PTENS), no consensus guidelines for therapy exist. This study systematically reviews the literature to assess the effect of PTENS in children with LUTS.

METHODS

A database search conducted up to December 2019 included Medline, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library. From the literature review, 6 randomized controlled studies (234 participants) comparing PTENS and standard treatment (urotherapy/anticholinergics) were considered. From each study, the success rates were available for PTENS and the control group. The ratio of success rates was computed-that is, the risk ratio (RR) and the risk difference (RD).

RESULTS

The overall success rate with PTENS was 1.92 times that of children undergoing standard urotherapy alone (RR: 1.92, 95% confidence interval [CI: 1.02, 3.61]) and 1.56 for those undergoing either urotherapy alone or with pharmacotherapy (anticholinergics; RR: 1.56, 95% CI [1.04, 2.40]). No difference in the success rate was found when PTENS was used in patients failing previous treatment (urotherapy and pharmacological therapy; RR: 0.175, 95% CI [0.02, 1.45]).

CONCLUSIONS

Current evidence suggests that PTENS is beneficial in children with LUTS. The chance of success is 1.92 times that of children undergoing standard urotherapy. However, in children who have failed urotherapy and pharmacological therapy, PTENS monotherapy has a limited role and should be an adjunct. Literature shortcomings included small numbers of patients, differing inclusion criteria, and PTENS protocols. A need exists for quality multicenter randomized controlled trials to prove the efficacy of PTENS in children with LUTS.

Role of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation in Treating Children With Overactive Bladder From Pooled Analysis of 8 Randomized Controlled Trials

Purpose

Transcutaneous electrical neural stimulation (TENS), as a non-invasive modality, has been clinically used as an alternative treatment for children with overactive bladder (OAB). We conducted a pooled analysis to explore the effect of TENS on OAB.

Methods

The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis guideline was followed in this study. The MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases, as well as the reference lists of the retrieved studies, were used to find trials relevant for assessing the use of TENS to treat OAB.

Results

Of the 246 records identified, 8 publications were analyzed in our study. Our analysis found that TENS resulted in a greater decrease of wet days/wk, daily voiding frequency, daily incontinence episodes, and daily number of voids than was observed in the control group. Furthermore, TENS-treated patients showed similar visual analogue scale (VAS) scores to patients in the control group, demonstrating that the application of TENS did not increase patients’ discomfort and pain. TENS had a relative advantage in the number of partial responses, but no clear differences were found in frequency of no response or a full response compared to the control group. In urodynamic testing, TENS led to obvious improvements in average voided volume and maximum voided volume in children with OAB.

Conclusions

TENS had a remarkable effect on the improvement of urodynamic indexes and objective OAB symptoms without a significant increase in VAS scores for children with OAB.

Impact of transcutaneous interferential electrical stimulation for management of primary bladder neck dysfunction in children

INTRODUCTION

Several studies have revealed that electrical stimulation is an effective modality for treatment of lower urinary tract (LUT) dysfunction via raising the capacity or compliance of the bladder or maybe by pelvic floor relaxation and reducing detrusor pressure as well.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to assess the efficacy of transcutaneous interferential (IF) electrical stimulation on LUT symptoms as well as urine flow parameters in children with primary bladder neck dysfunction (PBND).

STUDY DESIGN

We reviewed the charts of all children with persistent LUT symptoms who underwent IF electrical stimulation between 2010 and 2017. Twenty-three neurologically and anatomically normal children (mean age: 7.7 years, range: 5-13) with LUT symptoms were included in this study. Children had different LUT symptoms such as hesitancy, straining, urinary incontinence and constipation with no sufficient response to medical treatment (α -blocker) for at least 6 months. IF electrical stimulation was performed for 15 sessions, two times per week. All children were symptomatic and had abnormal urine flow pattern with an electromyographic (EMG) lag time of more than 6 s on uroflowmetry with EMG. A voiding chart, uroflowmetry with EMG and kidney and bladder ultrasounds were performed before and after the treatment for all children. Maximum and average urine flow rates, EMG lag time and postvoid residual volume were analyzed. In addition, alpha blocker therapy was continued during IF therapy.

RESULTS

Mean maximum and average urine flow rates improved from 14.1 to 7.6-19.7 ml/s and 9.5 ml/s, respectively, while mean EMG lag time decreased from 11.7 to 5.2 s after the treatment (all P < 0.05). Also postvoid residual volume decreased significantly from 35.6 to 7.6 ml at the end of treatment courses.

DISCUSSION

Pelvic floor EMG lag time, a documented parameter on uroflowmetry with EMG, defined as the time from the start of pelvic floor relaxation during a volitional voiding effort (the first stage of normal voiding) to the start of urine flow. Results showed that IF therapy decreased pelvic floor EMG lag time in children with PBND. In addition, increase in mean maximum and average urine flow rates in our patients indicated that pelvic IF therapy and behavioral modification improved voiding dysfunction in most of the patients and probably decreased bladder neck activity during voiding. Future studies with larger sample size are needed to support this finding.

CONCLUSION

IF therapy appears safe, effective and reproducible in improvement of PBND in children.

Urotherapy in the treatment of children and adolescents with bladder and bowel dysfunction: a systematic review

OBJECTIVE

To identify and describe the protocols and clinical outcomes of urotherapy interventions in children and adolescents with bladder bowel dysfunction.

METHOD

Systematic review carried out in June 2018 on Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (MEDLINE), Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL),Excerpta Medica dataBASE (EMBASE), Scientific Electronic Library Online (SciELO), Cochrane Library, and PsycInfo databases. Clinical trials and quasi-experimental studies carried out in the last ten years in children and/or adolescents with bladder and bowel symptoms and application of at least one component of urotherapy were included.

RESULTS

Thirteen clinical trials and one quasi-experimental study were included, with moderate methodological quality. The heterogeneity of the samples and of the methodological design of the articles prevented the performance of a meta-analysis. The descriptive analysis through simple percentages showed symptom reduction and improvement of uroflowmetry parameters. The identified urotherapy components were: educational guidance, water intake, caffeine reduction, adequate voiding position, pelvic floor training, programmed urination, and constipation control/management.

CONCLUSION

This review indicates positive results in terms of symptom reduction and uroflowmetry parameter improvement with standard urotherapy as the first line of treatment for children and adolescents with bladder bowel dysfunction. It is recommended that future studies bring contributions regarding the frequency, number, and time of urotherapy consultations.

Comparative assessment of efficacy and safety of different treatment for de novo overactive bladder children: A systematic review and network meta-analysis

Objective

To compare these managements focusing on the efficacy and safety to treat overactive bladder (OAB) in children through network meta-analysis (NMA).

Methods

We searched PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) and the reference lists up to May 1st, 2017. Data from eligible randomized controlled trails (RCT) studies including three different treatment options were extracted. The primary outcome was maximal voiding volume (MVV). We performed pairwise meta-analyses by random effects model and NMA by Bayesian model. We used the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) framework to assess the quality of evidence contributing to each network estimate.

Results

Six RCTs (462 patients) comparing three different interventions fulfilled the inclusion criteria. A low risk of bias was shown for the majority of the study items. The results of NMA showed that compared with antimuscarinic drugs, Parasacral transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation was associated with significant improvement in the MVV (mean difference [MD] = 58.50, 95% confidential interval [CI]: 45.95–69.52), followed by urotherapy group (MD = 21.03, 95% CI: 11.85–29.97). When it comes to the constipation, antimuscarinic drugs exerted significant benefit than PTENS (odds ratio [OR]: 0.22, 95% CI: 0.01–0.46). No significant difference was found between other treatments.

Conclusion

Compared with antimuscarinic drugs, PTENS was associated with significant better efficacy considering MVV, but more constipation events in de novo OAB children. Antimuscarinic drugs showed remarkably better efficacy considering MVV and comparable safety profile compared with urotherapy. Clinicians should take all known safety and compliance of patients into account when choosing an optimal strategy.

Conservative interventions for treating functional daytime urinary incontinence in children

BACKGROUND

In children, functional daytime urinary incontinence is the term used to describe any leakage of urine while awake that is not the result of a known underlying neurological or congenital anatomic cause (such as conditions or injuries that affect the nerves that control the bladder or problems with the way the urinary system is formed). It can result in practical difficulties for both the child and their family and can have detrimental effects on a child's well-being, education and social engagement.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of conservative interventions for treating functional daytime urinary incontinence in children.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Incontinence Specialised Register, which contains studies identified from CENTRAL, MEDLINE, MEDLINE In-Process, MEDLINE Epub Ahead of Print, CINAHL, ClinicalTrials.gov, WHO ICTRP and handsearching of journals and conference proceedings (searched 11 September 2018). We also searched Chinese language bibliographic databases: Chinese Biomedical Literature Database (CBM), China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), and Wanfang. No language restrictions were imposed.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs), quasi-randomised, multi-arm studies, cross-over studies and cluster-randomised studies that included children aged between 5 and 18 years with functional daytime urinary incontinence.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently screened records and determined the eligibility of studies for inclusion according to predefined criteria. Where data from the study were not provided, we contacted the study authors to request further information. Two review authors assessed risk of bias and processed included study data as described in the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Where meta-analysis was possible, we applied random-effects meta-analysis using the Mantel-Haenszel method for dichotomous outcomes.

MAIN RESULTS

The review included 27 RCTs involving 1803 children. Of these, six were multi-arm and one was also a cross-over study. Most studies were small, with numbers randomised ranging from 16 to 202. A total of 19 studies were at high risk of bias for at least one domain. Few studies reported data suitable for pooling due to heterogeneity in interventions, outcomes and measurements.Individual conservative interventions (lifestyle, behavioural or physical) versus no treatmentTranscutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) versus sham (placebo) TENS. More children receiving active TENS may achieve continence (risk ratio (RR) 4.89, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.68 to 14.21; 3 studies; n = 93; low-certainty evidence).One individual conservative intervention versus another individual or combined conservative interventionPelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) with urotherapy versus urotherapy alone. We are uncertain whether more children receiving PFMT with urotherapy achieve continence (RR 2.36, 95% CI 0.65 to 8.53, 95% CI 25 to 100; 3 studies; n = 91; very low-certainty evidence).Voiding education with uroflowmetry feedback and urotherapy versus urotherapy alone. Slightly more children receiving voiding education with uroflow feedback and urotherapy may achieve continence (RR 1.13, 95% CI 0.87 to 1.45; 3 studies; n = 151; low-certainty evidence).Urotherapy with timer watch versus urotherapy alone. We are uncertain whether urotherapy plus timer watch increases the number of children achieving continence compared to urotherapy alone (RR 1.42, 95% CI 1.12 to 1.80; 1 study; n = 58; very low-certainty evidence).Combined conservative interventions versus other combined conservative interventionsTENS and standard urotherapy versus PFMT with electromyographic biofeedback and standard urotherapy. We are uncertain whether there is any evidence of a difference between treatment groups in the proportions of children achieving continence (RR 1.11, 95% CI 0.73 to 1.68; 1 study; n = 78; very low-certainty evidence).PFMT with electromyography biofeedback and standard urotherapy versus PFMT without feedback but with standard urotherapy. We are uncertain whether there is any evidence of a difference between treatment groups in the proportions of children achieving continence (RR 1.05, 95% CI 0.72 to 1.52; 1 study; n = 41; very low-certainty evidence).Individual conservative interventions versus non-conservative interventions (pharmacological or invasive, combined or not with any conservative interventions)PFMT versus anticholinergics. We are uncertain whether more children receiving PFMT than anticholinergics achieve continence (RR 1.92, 95% CI 1.17 to 3.15; equivalent to an increase from 33 to 64 per 100 children; 2 studies; n = 86; very low-certainty evidence).TENS versus anticholinergics. We are uncertain whether there was any evidence of a difference between treatment groups in the proportions of children achieving continence (RR 0.81, 95% CI 0.05 to 12.50; 2 studies; n = 72; very low-certainty evidence).Combined conservative interventions versus non-conservative interventions (pharmacological or invasive, combined or not with any conservative interventions)Voiding education with uroflowmetry feedback versus anticholinergics. We are uncertain whether there was any evidence of a difference between treatment groups in the proportion of children achieving continence (RR 1.02, 95% CI 0.58 to 1.78; 1 study; n = 64; very low-certainty evidence).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The review found little reliable evidence that can help affected children, their carers and the clinicians working with them to make evidence-based treatment decisions. In this scenario, the clinical experience of individual clinicians and the support of carers may be the most valuable resources. More well-designed research, with well-defined interventions and consistent outcome measurement, is needed.

Traditional Biofeedback vs. Pelvic Floor Physical Therapy-Is One Clearly Superior?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Pelvic floor physical therapy is a worldwide accepted therapy that has been exclusively used to manage many pelvic floor disorders in adults and children. The aim of this review is to suggest to clinicians an updated understanding of this therapeutic approach in management of children with non-neuropathic voiding dysfunction.

RECENT FINDINGS

Today, pelvic floor muscle training through biofeedback is widely used as a part of a voiding retraining program aiming to help children with voiding dysfunction which is caused by pelvic floor overactivity. Biofeedback on its own, without a pelvic floor training component, is not an effective treatment. Biofeedback is an adjunct to the pelvic floor training. In the current review, we develop the role of pelvic floor physical therapy in management of children with non-neuropathic voiding dysfunction and compare it with biofeedback therapy alone.