Is two-port laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (T-LESS) feasible for pediatric hydroceles? Single-center experience with the initial 59 cases

Comparison of the results of open repair and laparoscopic repair with the PIRS method in the treatment of hydrocele in children

PURPOSE

Hydrocele is a result of intraperitoneal fluid filling into the scrotum through the patent processus vaginalis (PPV). While the traditional approach of pediatric hydrocele has been open repair (OR) for years, laparoscopic repair (LR) of hydrocele has been accepted worldwide after the proven efficacy of laparoscopy. The purpose is to compare the outcomes of both techniques in a single center.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of all the patients who underwent hydrocele repair from August 2016 to November 2022. In our center, the standard approach was OR in hydrocele until the November of 2021. Starting from this date, LR has begun to be preferred, as the experience has increased and its success has been observed. In the LR group, single-port percutaneous internal ring suturing technique was performed.

RESULTS

The data of 113 patients (OR 58.4% (n = 66), LR 41.6% (n = 47)) were collected. In preoperative examination, 12.4% (n = 14) patients were diagnosed as communicating and 87.6% (n = 99) non-communicating hydrocele. Intraoperatively, 65.5% (n = 74) patients were communicating and 34.5% (n = 39) were non-communicating. Total recurrence rate was 7% (n = 8). The OR group experienced a recurrence rate of 10.6% (n = 7), while the LR group experienced 2.12% (n = 1).

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopy may reveal intrabdominal connection of hydrocele better than open approach. It provides a high quality view of both inguinal rings and has the advantages of minimally invasive surgery.

Laparoscopic percutaneous closure of patent processus vaginalis without hydrocelectomy for childhood primary hydrocele

PURPOSE

To present our surgical technique and the outcome of single-incision laparoscopic percutaneous extraperitoneal closure (SILPEC) of patent processus vaginalis (PPV) without hydrocelectomy for childhood primary hydrocele (CPH).

METHODS

A prospective study was conducted on all cases of CPH treated with SILPEC at our center between June 2016 and December 2021. In our SILPEC procedure, PPV was closed extraperitoneally using a percutaneous needle with a wire lasso. No hydrocelectomy or fenestration of the hydrocele was performed. Percutaneous aspiration was performed when the hydrocele fluid could not be pushed back to the peritoneal cavity.

RESULTS

553 patients were enrolled, with a median age of 34 months (range from 22 months to 13 years). Ipsilateral PPV was present in all cases. There were no intraoperative complications and no conversion. At follow-up 6-72 months, recurrent hydrocele occurred in 0.36%, and subcutaneous stitch inflammatory reaction was noted in 0.7%. There was no case of testicular atrophy or iatrogenic cryptorchidism. Postoperative cosmesis was excellent as all patients were virtually scarless.

CONCLUSIONS

Ipsilateral PPV was present in all cases of CPH in our series. Our technique of SILPEC of PPV without hydrocelectomy is feasible and safe, with excellent postoperative cosmesis in the management of CPH.

Laparoscopic vs. Open Repair Surgery for the Treatment of Communicating Hydrocele in Children: A Retrospective Study From a Single Center

Purpose: This study evaluated the outcomes of laparoscopic repair (LR) and open repair (OR) surgery for communicating hydrocele in children.

Patients and Methods: We collected the clinical data and follow-up data of all boys (<14 years) who underwent communicating hydrocele surgery in the pediatric surgery department at Yijishan Hospital of Wannan Medical College from January 2017 to December 2018 and retrospectively analyzed the data.

Results: In this study, 155 patients were retrospectively enrolled, including 90 patients in the OR group and 65 patients in the LR group. There were significant differences in operation time and the recurrence of hydrocele between the two groups. The persistence of scrotal swelling in the LR group was significantly lower than that in the OR group. There was no significant difference in postoperative hospitalization time or incision infection rate between the two groups.

Conclusion: In conclusion, this study shows that laparoscopic treatment of children with communicating hydrocele has the advantages of a hidden incision, a shortened operation time, and a reduced postoperative recurrence rate and can be used as the preferred surgical method. However, laparoscopic treatment should be selected according to the specific condition of each child and cannot completely replace traditional open surgery.

Minimally Invasive Surgery in Pediatric Urology: Adaptations and New Frontiers

As the frontiers of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) continue to expand, the availability and implementation of new technology in pediatric urology are increasing. MIS is already an integral part of pediatric urology, but there is still much more potential change to come as both recent and upcoming advances in laparoscopic and robotic surgery are surveyed.

Single-Site Laparoscopic Percutaneous Extraperitoneal Closure Versus Modified Transumbilical Two-Port Laparoscopic Suturing of the Hernia Sac for the Treatment of Pediatric Inguinal Hernia: Comparison of the Outcomes of Two Different Approaches

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the surgical outcomes of single-site laparoscopic percutaneous extraperitoneal closure (SLPEC) and modified transumbilical two-port laparoscopic suturing (M-TTLS) of the hernia sac for the treatment of pediatric inguinal hernia (PIH) and determine whether one approach was superior to another.

METHODS

From January 2014 to June 2017, a total of 599 children had undergone SLPEC or M-TTLS in our department. SLPEC and M-TTLS were the most frequently performed single-site laparoscopic procedures for PIH in our department, which represented the extraperitoneal and intraperitoneal approaches, respectively. All patients were followed up at the out-patients' clinics and the medical records were reviewed with respect to all operative outcomes.

RESULTS

There were 412 patients undergoing SLPEC and 187 patients undergoing M-TTLS, of which 358 hernias were on the right side, 172 on the left and 69 bilaterally. Two hundred and thirty-one unilateral hernias with contralateral patent processus vaginalis underwent contralateral repair at the same session. Mean operation time was 10.81 minutes in unilateral repair and 17.00 minutes in bilateral repairs, respectively. The perioperative complications included minor extraperitoneal hematoma in four (0.44%) patients, recurrence in one (0.11%), hydrocele in five (0.56%), and contralateral metachronous inguinal hernia in three (1.00%). No other complication developed in either group. There was no significant difference of complications between the two approaches except for the longer operation time in M-TTLS.

CONCLUSIONS

Both SLPEC and M-TTLS were the safe and effective methods for PIH. The complications were comparable for M-TTLS and SLPEC, but operation time was significantly longer in M-TTLS than in SLPEC.

Effectiveness of Laparoscopy in the Treatment of Pediatric Hydrocele: A Systematic Review

Objective: To conduct a systematic review of the published studies concerning laparoscopic pediatric hydrocele (PH) repair and summarize the surgical details and operative outcomes of this procedure. Materials and Methods: A PubMed search was performed for all studies concerning laparoscopic repair of hydrocele in children. The search strategy was as follows: (laparoscop* OR coelioscop* OR peritoneoscop* OR laparoendoscop* OR minilaparoscop*) AND hydrocele* AND (child* OR pediatric*). Inclusion criteria included (1) children with hydrocele as the study participant; (2) laparoscopic PH repair as the main surgical procedure; and (3) operation time and complications as the outcomes of interest. Reviews, studies with insufficient information or reporting the outcomes of abdominoscrotal hydrocele, and duplicate patient series were excluded. Results: Overall, 20 studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria of this review and 15 studies were included in the final analysis. These studies comprised at least 2920 patients undergoing laparoscopic repair for various PH subtypes, of which most were conducted in Asia. Most authors repaired PH laparoscopically through an extraperitoneal approach, while only a few studies applied a laparoscopic intraperitoneal method. The majority of the studies used nonabsorbable sutures to ligate hydrocele sac, while very few studies used absorbable materials. Hydrocele sac was resected or transected in only five studies, but left alone in the majority. Mean operation time was between 15.6 and 43.2 minutes for unilateral laparoscopic PH repair and between 16.9 and 53.2 minutes for bilateral surgery. Operative complications were not very common, with a highest recurrence/persistence incidence of 1.4%. Subgroup analysis showed that hydrocele subtype, surgical approach, suture material, and management of hydrocele sac did not significantly influence the operative complications. Conclusions: laparoscopic PH repair seems to be a safe and effective procedure. Given the limitations of this review, our conclusion needs to be confirmed by more well-designed studies.

Single-Site Laparoscopy and Robotic Surgery in Pediatric Urology

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

In this review, we summarize research that has evaluated the role of laparoendoscopic single-site (LESS) and robotic surgery in pediatric urology, highlighting new and/or controversial ideas.

RECENT FINDINGS

The newest research developments over the last several years are studies that address generalizability of these techniques, ideal patient factors, extrapolation to more complex surgeries, and comparative studies to more traditional techniques to define the associated costs and benefits, as well as patient-centered outcomes. Specifically in the field of LESS, addressing the limitations of suboptimal vision, instrument crowding, and loss of triangulation have been a focus. The literature is now replete with new applications for robotic surgery as well as descriptions of the specific technical challenges inherent to pediatrics. Robotic surgery and LESS are areas of growth in pediatric urology that allow continual innovation and expansion of technology within a surgeon's armamentarium.