E-learning teaches attendings "how to" objectively assess pediatric urology trainees' surgery skills for orchiopexy

Auditorium of the future: e learning platform

Principles of surgical training have not changed, but methods of training are evolving very fast. Online tools are being adopted in both knowledge and skills training for surgical residents. As a result, to evaluate the outcome of these tools, online assessment is also developing. Knowledge resources are very diverse ranging from lectures, webinars, surgical videos to three-dimensional planning and printing. Skills resources include virtual reality simulators, remote skills training and interdisciplinary teamwork. Assessment of E-learning tools can be performed using online questions, task-based simulations, branching scenarios and online interviews/discussions. In thoracic surgery, video assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) lobectomy simulator has been developed and it appears to be an important tool for minimally invasive thoracic surgery education. Training programs incorporate e-Learning in their curriculum and online training and assessment will become an important part of thoracic surgical training as well.

Improving surgical training by identifying the most common feedback trainees receive for index cases

BACKGROUND

To make surgical training more effective, a proven method is needed to provide feedback to residents on their surgeries. Residency programs may make up for limited training time in the operating room by improving feedback that trainees receive about cases.

OBJECTIVE

The goals of this study were (1) to determine if an online tool to communicate feedback for attendings and trainees shows face validity and (2) to use an online tool to identify the most common feedback trainees receive after performing orchiopexy and hypospadias repair by survey.

METHODS

In 2016, determining whether an online tool to provide pediatric urology trainees feedback after surgery shows face validity begun. The tool was launched at the authors' institutions. Then, attendings, fellows, and postgraduate year 4-5 trainees of 65 resident training programs were surveyed for their observations on preparing for and performing orchiopexy and hypospadias repair using the study tool to identify common feedback.

RESULTS

The results of using the tool to provide feedback shows face validity are as follows: feedback was exchanged between attendings and trainees on orchiopexy (n = 28) and hypospadias (n = 22). Anecdotally, the tool was easy to use. The results of using the tool to identify the most common feedback trainees receive by survey are as follows: from a pool of 65 institutions, 37 attendings and 28 trainees were enrolled who made 219 observations. Most trainees prepare using undocumented online resources (17/28, 67%) instead of speaking with their attendings or cotrainees (11/28, 33%). For orchiopexy, most respondents reported that trainees need to improve skills for hernia ligation (observations: attending = 28/45, 62%; and trainee = 17/26, 65%) and strategies for hernia exposure (observations: attending = 17/27, 62%; and trainee = 7/12, 58%). For hypospadias, most respondents reported that trainees need to improve skills for neourethroplasty (observations: attending = 31/53, 58%; and trainee = 10/16, 62%) and strategies for repair choice (observations: attending = 15/22, 68%; and trainee = 12/18, 67%) (chi-squared, all P = NS).

DISCUSSION

It was shown that both trainees and attendings agree on the areas of surgical strategy and execution which require improvement. With this study, it is also shown that the online feedback tool developed shows face validity in allowing attendings and trainees to communicate before and after surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

The most common feedback pediatric urology trainees receive for routine pediatric urology surgery is identified. Online tools that emphasize remediations to address a trainee's specific feedback needs are to be built, so that they will be able to improve their skills at their next case.

Differences in early career operative experiences among pediatric urologists

INTRODUCTION

Previous research suggests that pediatric urologists feel well trained by their fellowship for cases encountered early in their career. We questioned the complexity and diversity of cases new pediatric urologists were actually performing.

OBJECTIVE

The aim was to identify the frequency with which newly trained pediatric urologists are performing various procedures, investigate which factors are associated with case complexity and diversity, and evaluate for differences between male and female surgeons.

STUDY DESIGN

Case logs of urologists from July 30, 2007, to June 30, 2013, initially applying for the certifying examination who self-identified as pediatric urologists were reviewed. Data points included cases/dates, and surgeon demographics. An in-depth analysis was performed on 51 index cases from the 71 included pediatric urologists, for which a level of complexity was assigned.

RESULTS

Compared with the bottom volume quartile, surgeons in the top quartile performed more cases of minimal (115.9 ± 8.7 vs. 51.7 ± 8.7, p < 0.001), moderate (31.1 ± 2.7 vs. 10.1 ± 1.0, p < 0.001) and significant (10.8 ± 1.9 vs. 2.0 ± 0.4, p < 0.001) complexity. More than 90% logged circumcisions, orchiopexies, and inguinal hernia repairs, while less than 1.5% logged open nephroureterectomies or complete male epispadias repair. Surgeons submitted at least one of 17.2 ± 0.5 (range 5-28) unique codes. The figure presents the percentage of current procedural terminology (CPT) codes performed by each urologist. Surgeons with the least case diversity performed a higher percentage of low-complexity cases, and lower percentages of moderate and complex cases (p < 0.001). Males, comprising 60.6% of urologists, performed more cases than females (342.9 ± 30.9 vs. 229.1 ± 18.1, p = 0.007), averaging more cases of minimal (95.0 ± 6.6 vs. 73.3 ± 4.6, p = 0.018) and significant (6.7 ± 1.0 vs. 2.8 ± 0.5, p = 0.005) complexity. There was no difference in cases of moderate complexity (22.0 ± 1.9 vs. 18.1 ± 2.1, p = 0.201).

DISCUSSION

In general, pediatric urologists should expect to perform many minor cases when they enter practice. Women are entering urology in increasing numbers. In our study, female urologists performed fewer cases. This could have implications for the workforce, which in urology in general is expected to decrease.

CONCLUSIONS

Case diversity and degree of complexity vary among newly trained pediatric urologists. The urologist with the greatest case diversity never performed 45% of the 51 analyzed CPT codes, while the one with the least case diversity never performed 90% of the codes. Male surgeons performed more operations, particularly those of minimal and significant complexity. The variability in operative experience reinforces the importance of continuing education and mentorship after completion of fellowship.