Practice variation on use of antibiotics: An international survey among pediatric urologists

The diversity of hypospadias management in North America: a survey of pediatric urologists

PURPOSE

To determine trends in hypospadias management, including surgical techniques and perioperative care, by pediatric urologists in North America.

METHODS

An anonymous online survey was devised to assess approaches to hypospadias repair and management, including anesthetic considerations, catheter placement, choice of dressing, and postoperative antibiotic treatment. The survey was sent to all practicing members of the Societies for Pediatric Urology.

RESULTS

The survey was completed by 133 (34.5%) respondents. Hypospadias repair was overwhelmingly recommended between ages 6-12 months (89.5%). A local or regional anesthetic block (caudal, penile, pudendal, spinal) is performed nearly universally (96.2%). The majority of surgeons perform distal repairs outpatient (70.7%), while fewer perform outpatient staged repairs (47.4%) or redo surgery (33.8%). Nearly all respondents preferred either VicrylTM/DexonTM (50.4%) or MaxonTM/PDSTM (48.1%) for urethroplasty. All but one respondent leaves a stent for midshaft to proximal repairs whereas stenting for glanular repairs was split with 53.4% leaving a stent. Most surgeons (60.9-70.9%) prescribe postoperative antibiotics regardless of severity and the majority (72.9%) prescribe narcotics for analgesia.

CONCLUSIONS

Approaches to hypospadias repair are extremely varied such that there is a lack of consensus among pediatric urologists regarding most aspects of hypospadias management. Investigations comparing hypospadias practice patterns are necessary to develop a standard of care for this complex pediatric urologic entity.

The effect of the use of postoperative antibiotic prophylaxis compared with non-use for stented distal hypospadias repair wound: A meta-analysis

A meta-analysis investigation to measure the influence of the usage of postoperative antibiotic prophylaxis (POP) compared with non-usage for stented distal hypospadias repair (SDHR). A comprehensive literature inspection till February 2023 was applied and 1067 interrelated investigations were reviewed. The 10 chosen investigations enclosed 1398 individuals with SDHR in the chosen investigations starting point, 812 of them were using POP, and 586 were not using POP. Odds ratio (OR) in addition to 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to compute the value of the effect of the usage of POP compared with non-usage for SDHR by the dichotomous and continuous approaches and a fixed or random model. No significant difference was found between individuals using POP and not using POP in posthypospadias repair problem (PRP) (OR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.42-2.34, P = .97) with moderate heterogeneity (I2  = 69%), posthypospadias repair infection problem (PRIP) (OR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.30-1.06, P = .08) with no heterogeneity (I2  = 15%), and overall composite posthypospadias repair wound healing associated problem (OCPRWHAP) (OR, 1.27; 95% CI, 0.61-2.63, P = .53) with moderate heterogeneity (I2  = 59%) for SDHR. No significant difference was found between individuals using POP and not using POP in PRP, PRIP, and OCPRWHAP for SDHR. However, cautilised of the small sample sizes of several chosen investigations for this meta-analysis, care must be exercised when dealing with its values, for example, the low P-value of the PRIP.

Does prophylactic antibiotics post pediatric pyeloplasty reduce the incidence of febrile UTIs?

PURPOSE

The use of postoperative prophylactic antibiotics in pediatric upper urinary tract reconstruction remains controversial. In this study, we examined whether low dose antibiotics administered following pediatric pyeloplasty reduce the incidence of febrile urinary tract infections at our institution. As a secondary outcome, in those patients with infection, additional analysis was performed to better quantify which patient population benefits the most from low dose prophylactic antibiotics.

METHODS

Institutional review board approval (IRB) was obtained. All methods were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations. A retrospective study was performed in patients who underwent pyeloplasty (2011-2017) at our institution. Surgical approach (laparoscopic versus robotic assisted versus open, with or without internal JJ ureteral stent) were based on surgeon preference. Patients of 8 fellowship trained pediatric urologists were included in the study period. Patients with prior history of urologic interventions or other congenital genitourinary tract abnormalities were excluded. Demographics (age, gender, ethnicity, insurance status), prior history of culture proven urinary tract infection, surgical details (administration of perioperative antibiotics), and postoperative outcomes including; 1) re-admission 30 days post-surgery, 2) any urine cultures collected due to suspected urinary tract infection.

RESULTS

A total of 209 patients (149 boys, 60 girls) met our inclusion criteria with 55/209 (26%) receiving postoperative prophylactic antibiotics. The average age was 6 years (range: 2 months-18 years). Indwelling ureteral stent was used in 176 (84%) patients. Eleven patients (5%) had a culture-proven urinary tract infection within 30-days postoperatively. No significant differences were seen in postoperative complications or incidence of urinary tract infection when comparing surgical approaches, +/- ureteral stent, or the use of antibiotics. Secondary analysis noted statistically significant increase in post-operative urinary tract infection in younger children (2.8 v. 6.2 years, p = 0.02), those patients who had a positive preoperative urine culture (8/11, p = 0.01) and those with public health insurance (p = 0.038).

CONCLUSION

The incidence of postoperative urinary tract infection following pyeloplasty in our cohort was relatively low. There was a higher incidence of urinary tract infection in patients less than 3 years old. The use of antibiotics in patients post pyeloplasty did not appear to affect the incidence of post-operative urinary tract infection, however, they may have a role in children who have not yet potty trained and in patients with positive preoperative urine culture.

Pyeloplasty with ureteral stent placement in children: Do prophylactic antibiotics serve a purpose?

OBJECTIVES

Ureteral stents are commonly used during pyeloplasty to ensure drainage and anastomotic healing. Antibiotic prophylaxis is often used due to concerns for urinary tract infection (UTI). Although many surgeons prescribe prophylactic antibiotics following pyeloplasty, practices vary widely due to lack of clear evidence-based guidelines. We hypothesize that the rate of stent UTI does not significantly vary between children who receive antibiotics and those who do not.

METHODS

We reviewed the medical records of 741 patients undergoing pyeloplasty between January 2010 and July 2018 across seven institutions. Exclusion criteria were: age older than 22 years, no stent placed, externalized stents used, and incomplete records. Surgical approach, age, antibiotic use, stent duration, Foley duration, and urine culture results were recorded. Patients were categorized into two groups, those younger than four years of age and those four years and older as proxy for likely diaper use. Univariate logistic regression was conducted to identify variables associated with UTI. Multivariable backward stepwise logistic regression was used to identify the best model with Akaike information criterion as model selection criteria. The selected model was used to calculate odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals summarizing the association between prophylactic antibiotics and stent UTI while controlling for age, gender, and intra-operative urine cultures.

RESULTS

672 patients were included; 338 received antibiotic prophylaxis and 334 did not. These groups differed in mean age (3.91 vs. 6.91 years, P < .001), mean stent duration (38.5 vs. 35.32 days, P < .001), and surgical approach (53.25% vs. 32.04% open vs. laparoscopic, P < .001). The incidence of stent UTI was low overall (7.59%) and similar in both groups: 31/338 (9.17%) in the prophylaxis group and 20/334 (5.99%) in the non-prophylaxis group (P = .119). Although female gender, likely diaper use, and positive intra-operative urine culture were each associated with significantly higher odds of stent UTI, prophylactic antibiotic use was not associated with significant reduction in stent UTI in any of these groups. Surgical approach, stent duration, and Foley duration were not associated with stent UTI.

CONCLUSION

Incidence of stent UTI is low overall following pyeloplasty. Prophylactic antibiotics are not associated with lower rates of stent UTI following pyeloplasty even after controlling for risk factors of female gender, likely diaper use, and positive intra-operative urine culture. Routine administration of prophylactic antibiotics after pyeloplasty does not appear to be beneficial, and may be best reserved for those with multiple risk factors for UTI.

Randomized trial of prophylactic antibiotics vs. placebo after midshaft-to-distal hypospadias repair: the PROPHY Study

BACKGROUND

Use of prophylactic antibiotics after stented hypospadias repair is very common, but most research has not identified any clinical benefits of this practice. Only one study has found that postoperative prophylaxis reduces symptomatic urinary tract infections (UTIs). Data from the same trial suggested that prophylaxis may also reduce urethroplasty complications. No studies on this subject have been placebo-controlled.

OBJECTIVE

We performed a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to evaluate the effect of postoperative prophylactic antibiotics on the incidence of infection or urethroplasty complications after stented repair of midshaft-to-distal hypospadias.

STUDY DESIGN

Boys were eligible for this multicenter trial if they had a primary, single-stage repair of mid-to-distal hypospadias with placement of an open-drainage urethral stent for an intended duration of 5-10 days. Participants were randomized in a double-blind fashion to receive oral trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole or placebo twice daily for 10 days postoperatively. The primary outcome was a composite of symptomatic UTI, surgical site infection (SSI), and urethroplasty complications, including urethrocutaneous fistula, meatal stenosis, and dehiscence. Secondary outcomes included each component of the primary outcome as well as acute adverse drug reactions (ADRs) and C. difficile colitis.

RESULTS

Infection or urethroplasty complications occurred in 10 of 45 boys (22%) assigned to receive antibiotic prophylaxis as compared with 5 of 48 (10%) who received placebo (relative risk [RR], 2.1; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.8 to 5.8; p = 0.16). There were no significant differences between groups in symptomatic UTIs, SSIs, or any urethroplasty complications. Mild ADRs occurred in 3 of 45 boys (7%) assigned to antibiotics as compared with 5 of 48 (10%) given placebo (RR, 0.6; 95% CI, 0.2 to 2.5; p = 0.72). There were no moderate-to-severe ADRs, and no patients developed C. difficile colitis.

CONCLUSIONS

In this placebo-controlled trial of 93 patients, prophylactic antibiotics were not found to reduce infection or urethroplasty complications after stented mid-to-distal hypospadias repair. The study did not reach its desired sample size and was therefore underpowered to independently support a conclusion that prophylaxis is not beneficial. However, the result is consistent with most prior research on this subject.

GOV IDENTIFIER

NCT02096159.

Antimicrobial Prophylaxis for Urologic Procedures in Paediatric Patients: A RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method Consensus Study in Italy

The main aim of surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis (SAP) in urologic procedures is to prevent bacteraemia, surgical site infections (SSIs), and postoperative urinary tract infections (ppUTIs). Guidelines for SAP in paediatric urology are lacking. Only some aspects of this complex topic have been studied, and the use of antibiotic prophylaxis prior to surgical procedures seems to be more often linked to institutional schools of thought or experts’ opinions than to rules dictated by studies demonstrating the most correct and preferred management. Therefore, the aim of this Consensus document realized using the RAND/UCLA appropriateness method is to provide clinicians with a series of recommendations on SAP for the prevention of bacteraemia, SSIs, and ppUTIs after urologic imaging and surgical procedures in paediatric patients. Despite the few available studies, experts agree on some basilar concepts related to SAP for urologic procedures in paediatric patients. Before any urological procedure is conducted, UTI must be excluded. Clean procedures do not require SAP, with the exception of prosthetic device implantation and groin and perineal incisions where the SSI risk may be increased. In contrast, SAP is needed in clean-contaminated procedures. Studies have also suggested the safety of eliminating SAP in paediatric hernia repair and orchiopexy. To limit the emergence of resistance, every effort to reduce and rationalize antibiotic consumption for SAP must be made. Increased use of antibiotic stewardship can be greatly effective in this regard.

A survey of adult and pediatric urologists on current practice in antibiotic prophylaxis for ureteral stent removal

INTRODUCTION

Recommendations for antibiotic prophylaxis prior to cystourethroscopy with manipulation are based on limited evidence and may not be applicable to procedures without tissue resection such as ureteral stent removal.

OBJECTIVES

Our objectives were to investigate and compare practice patterns among adult and pediatric urologists on antibiotic prophylaxis for stent removal.

STUDY DESIGN

An online survey was distributed to members of the Endourological Society (EUS) and Societies for Pediatric Urology (SPU) including questions about provider demographics and practice patterns. Adult urologists were defined as EUS member respondents and pediatric urologists were defined as SPU member respondents. Comparisons were made using Pearson's Chi-Square analysis.

RESULTS

Of 2544 adult urologists surveyed, 258 (10%) completed the survey and of 714 pediatric urologists surveyed, 180 (25%) completed the survey (Table 1). Pediatric urologists report using antibiotic prophylaxis "most of the time" (i.e. ≥ 75% of the time) more often than adult urologist when removing stents by string or operating room cystoscopy but less often when removing stents by office cystoscopy. Pediatric urologists report using antibiotic prophylaxis "most of the time" more often than adult urologists after pyeloplasty, ureteroscopy and ureteral reimplantation. There is no difference in reported duration of prophylaxis between adult and pediatric urologists, with 64% giving a single dose. Pediatric urologists report obtaining a urine culture (UC) "most of the time" more often than adult urologists (32% vs 15%, p < 0.001), but there is no difference in reported use of antibiotic treatment by UC result. Sixty-four percent of survey respondents report giving patients with negative UC antibiotic treatment, and 93% of survey respondents report treating patients with asymptomatic bacteriuria (defined as patients with a positive urine culture but no symptoms) with antibiotics.

DISCUSSION

There is variation in reported practice among surveyed adult and pediatric urologists regarding antibiotic prophylaxis prior to stent removal. Overall, pediatric urologists report using antibiotic prophylaxis prior to stent removal more often than adult urologists.

CONCLUSIONS

This variation in practice combined with lack of evidence to support the use of antibiotic prophylaxis prior to ureteral stent removal underscores the need for additional research to guide the development of evidence-driven guidelines for both adult and pediatric patients.

Inclusion of surgical antibiotic regimens in pediatric urology publications: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Perioperative antibiotics prevent infections after surgery. Guidelines for antibiotic use allow the surgeon to balance the risks of adverse events and drug resistance with the benefit of reduced infection rates. However, due to a lack of evidence-based guidelines within pediatric urology, antibiotic practices vary widely. We performed a systematic literature review to investigate when and how authors report their antibiotic usage and infectious outcomes. Our aim was to analyze the available data on perioperative antibiotics and infection rates within pediatric urology.

METHODS

This systematic review was conducted in line with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. A search strategy was devised to identify reports of pediatric urology surgery and use of antibiotics or infectious outcomes. Embase and Medline were queried with no year restrictions with subject heading terms to identify publications on common pediatric urology surgeries. The procedures studied were hypospadias repair, pyeloplasty, orchidopexy, ureteral reimplant, and circumcision. Two independent reviewers screened all titles and abstracts, followed by relevant full texts, for eligibility. Articles were included if the procedure was performed on the majority of study patients, the procedure was performed by urologic surgeons, and the population studied was a pediatric population defined as 0-18 years of age. Case reports, meta-analyses, and editorials were excluded. Data was extracted by one independent reviewer into a preformatted database. Collected data included journal type, date of publication, patient demographics, preoperative and postoperative antibiotic details including regimens, and infection outcomes. The primary outcome was reporting of antibiotic use preoperatively or postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included: reporting of infection, antibiotic class and dosage. Since all studies were diverse, only qualitative analysis was conducted.

RESULTS

We identified 1483 publications with 297 meeting inclusion criteria. Of these, 9% reported their use of preoperative antibiotics, and 34% reported their use of postoperative antibiotics. Only 6% of studies reported the specific antibiotic class, 15% reported duration, and 1% reported dosage and frequency. Infection outcomes were reported in 58% of studies. Only 57% of studies that reported on infection outcomes described their antibiotics practices.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical antibiotic regimens and infection outcomes are infrequently included in pediatric urology studies, limiting the data available for development of evidence-based guidelines. Routine incorporation of antibiotic regimens, infection outcomes and adverse events in the pediatric urology literature will increase our ability to identify indications for antibiotics. Reporting of perioperative antibiotic outcomes in pediatric urology procedures will allow the eventual development of strong evidence-based guidelines.

The use of postoperative prophylactic antibiotics in stented distal hypospadias repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

The current literature on the use of antibiotics perioperatively for many pediatric procedures, including hypospadias, is inconsistent. There is currently no clear evidence for the use of postoperative antibiotic prophylaxis for stented distal hypospadias repair.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to synthesize and assess the available literature on the use versus non-use of postoperative antibiotic prophylaxis for stented distal hypospadias repair.

METHODOLOGY

Systematic literature search was performed on March 2018 for evaluation of trials that assessed the use and non-use of postoperative prophylactic antibiotics among stented distal hypospadias repair in children. Methodological quality of the studies was assessed according to the study design as recommended by the Cochrane Collaboration. The outcome assessed includes composite overall posthypospadias repair complications of infection and wound healing complications. The event rate for each treatment group was extracted to extrapolate intervention relative risk (RR) and corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI). Mantel-Haenszel method with random effect model was used in pooling of effect estimates from the included studies. Heterogeneity was assessed with subgroup analysis performed according to the study design. Publication bias was likewise determined. The protocol of this review was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42018087301) and reported in accordance with preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines.

RESULT

A total of seven studies (four cohorts, three randomized controlled trials) with 986 stented distal hypospadias repairs (408 with no post-operative prophylactic antibiotics and 578 given postoperative prophylactic antibiotics) were included for the meta-analysis. Moderate to serious risk of bias was noted among the cohort studies, while the included randomized controlled trials (RCT) were of high risk of bias. Inconsistencies of effect estimates between subgroups and publication bias with small study effect were likely present. The overall pooled effect estimates comparing treatment groups showed no significant difference for outcomes of overall composite postoperative complication (RR 0.93, 95% CI 0.45, 1.93). Assessment of composite infection related complications and wound healing complications likewise did not show any significant between-group differences (RR 1.28, 95% CI 0.49, 3.35 and RR 1.01, 95% CI 0.48, 2.12; respectively) (Table). Asymptomatic bacteriuria was noted to be significantly higher among the intervention group with no postoperative prophylactic antibiotics (RR 4.01, 95% CI 1.11, 14.54).

CONCLUSION

The available evidence to date was assessed to be of high risk. The low level of evidence generated suggests that there is limited utility in the use of postoperative prophylactic antibiotics to prevent clinically significant posthypospadias repair complications.

What proportion of initially prescribed antidepressants is still being prescribed chronically after 5 years in general practice? A longitudinal cohort analysis

OBJECTIVES

Antidepressant prescribing almost doubled in the Netherlands between 1996 and 2012, which could be accounted for by longer continuation after the first prescription. This might be problematic given a growing concern of large-scale antidepressant dependence. We aimed to assess the extent and determinants of chronic antidepressant prescribing among patient aged 18 years and older. We hypothesise a relatively large prevalence of chronic (>2 years) prescription.

DESIGN

A longitudinal observational study based on routinely registered prescription data from general practice.

SETTING

189 general practices in the Netherlands.

PARTICIPANTS

326 025 patients with valid prescription data for all 5 years of the study.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Primary outcome measure: the number of patients (N) receiving at least four antidepressant prescriptions in 2011, as well as during each of the four subsequent years. Secondary outcome measure: the above, but specified for selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and for tricyclic antidepressants.

RESULTS

Antidepressants were prescribed to almost 7% of our 326 025 participants each year. They were prescribed for depression (38%), anxiety (17%), other psychological disorders (20%) and non-psychological indications (25%). Antidepressants were prescribed in all 5 years to the 42% of the population who had at least four prescriptions dispensed in 2011. Chronic prescribing was higher among women than men, for those aged 45-64 years than for those aged >65 years and for those treated for depression or anxiety than for non-psychological indications (eg, neuropathic pain). Chronic prescribing also varied markedly among general practices.

CONCLUSION

Chronic antidepressant use is common for depression and for anxiety and non-psychological diagnoses. Once antidepressants have been prescribed, general practitioners and other prescribers should be aware of the risks associated with long-term use and should provide annual monitoring of the continued need for therapy.

Management of hypospadias in Saudi Arabia: A national survey

Introduction:

Hypospadias is one of the most common congenital anomalies of the penis. Different methods of hypospadias management are described in the literature. We try in this study to evaluate the national trends and to compare them with international practices.

Materials and Methods:

A multiple choice survey was distributed among a sample of national practitioners using a weblink between September and December 2017. It included questions about participants demographics, number of cases operated on per year, perioperative care and preferences, long-term follow-up, and complications. Data were analyzed and compared with international practices.

Results:

Results of 47 practitioners were evaluated and analyzed in this study. The majority of the participants were pediatric urologists (48.9%) and from the central province (44.7%). Most of the participants prefer to operate on patients between the ages of 1 and 2 years (48.9%) and operate at ≥20 cases per year (76.6%). Tubularized incised plate (TIP) is the preferred technique for distal penile hypospadias repair whereas staged repair is preferred for proximal cases. All participants use a form of a second layer and a stent for their repairs. The majority reported an overall complication rate of ≤10% for distal penile hypospadias (76.1%) and >10% for proximal penile cases (59.6%).

Conclusion:

This study helped us identify national trends in hypospadias management, which were comparable to the international trends. TIP repair is the preferred technique for distal penile hypospadias repair whereas staged repair is preferred for more complex proximal variants. Although data in this study come from reports of personal experience, it can serve as a backbone for the future prospective studies on this topic.