Staged repair of redo and crippled hypospadias: analysis of outcomes and complications

Advantages of Urethroplasty Terminating at the Corona for Severe Hypospadias: Complications, Uroflowmetry, and Esthetics

PURPOSE

Mid-shaft/proximal (msp) and penoscrotal/scrotal/perineal (pssp) hypospadias treated by urethroplasty (UP) terminating at the corona (UPC) or UP terminating at the tip of the glans (UPG) were compared.

METHODS

UP performed at a single institute (n = 234) between 2003 and 2020 were grouped as: msp-UPC (n = 23), msp-UPG (n = 75), pssp-UPC (n = 81), and pssp-UPG (n = 55) to compare data obtained from medical records for post-UP complications (PUC; urethral stenosis, urethrocutaneous fistula, diverticulum formation, and bleeding; n = 234), post-UP uroflowmetry (PUF; average flow rate (Qave), maximum flow rate (Qmax), voiding time (VT), voided volume (VV) and urine flow curves) in 57 UP patients [msp-UPC (n = 5), msp-UPG (n = 12), pssp-UPC (n = 32), pssp-UPG (n = 8)] and 9 controls, and post-UPC esthetics (EST; n = 104). P < 0.05 was considered significant.

RESULTS

Mean ages at UP (years) were: msp-UPC (3.1 ± 3.0), msp-UPG (3.3 ± 1.4), pssp-UPC (4.6 ± 2.4), and pssp-UPG (3.4 ± 1.4); p < 0.0001 by ANOVA test. Overall, there were significantly more PUC in pssp-UPG compared with pssp-UPC except for bleeding. Ages at PUF assessment were similar. Mean Qave (mL/s) for pssp-UPG (4.0 ± 1.0) was significantly less than pssp-UPC (5.9 ± 2.5; p < 0.05) and both were significantly less than controls (6.9 ± 1.8; p < 0.05, p < 0.01, respectively). Mean Qmax (mL/s) for pssp-UPC (11.4 ± 4.8) was significantly better than pssp-UPG (7.8 ± 2.3; p < 0.05) and for controls (14.9 ± 4.4) was significantly better than pssp-UPG (7.8 ± 2.3; p < 0.01). All VT (seconds) were similar to controls; all urine flow curves were normal. For EST in UPC (n = 104), 3 cases requested meatal advancement.

CONCLUSIONS

UPC may be a valid option for treating pssp hypospadias because of significant differences in PUC/PUF and minimal EST issues compared with UPG.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognosis Study Level-Ⅱ.

What are the factors affecting glanular dehiscence after hypospadias surgery?

BACKGROUND

Glanular dehiscence (GD) is one of the main complications after hypospadias surgery. There is a limited number of publications regarding GD in the literature.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this work is to reveal the factors that affect GD after a literature review.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

A literature search for relevant articles was performed in database using the search term glans dehiscence without setting date range limit or any other limits. All articles related to GD after hypospadias surgery were included in this study. After collecting the information from full text articles, 71 articles were included in this systematic review. In these studies, localization of hypospadic meatus, type of surgery, and other clinical data which were thought to behave as risk factors for GD were obtained. Chi-Square test was used to evaluate the differences between the parameters, where p < 0.05 was taken as statistically significant.

RESULTS

After evaluating the 71 articles that met the inclusion criteria, 309 cases (3.48%) of GD after 8858 hypospadias repairs were obtained in this review. GD rates were found significantly high for proximal hypospadias (5%), two-stage hypospadia repairs (5%) and re-do hypospadias repair (8.75%) (p = 0.002, 0.022, and 0.004, respectively). Glans width <14 mm, urethral plate (UP) width <7 mm, hypospadias surgeries performed before 6 months of age and after puberty, and caudal block anesthesia increased the rate of GD.

CONCLUSIONS

The rate of GD increases after proximal, cripple and staged hypospadias surgeries, a glans width <15 mm and UP width <8 mm, postpubertal surgeries, and caudal anesthesia use during surgery.

Application of the Mathieu combined tunnel technique for repairing glans dehiscence after failed hypospadias repair

Repairing glans dehiscence after failed hypospadias repair is challenging for pediatric surgeons. Here, we introduced and evaluated a newly modified Mathieu technique, Mathieu combined tunnel (MCT), which involves multiple custom-designed flaps for the shortage of flap source material after repeated operations; we also constructed a tunnel to avoid the glans incision that may carry new risks of dehiscence. This retrospective study included 26 patients who were consecutively admitted to the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University (Guangzhou, China) for glans dehiscence repair after failed hypospadias repair from October 2014 to October 2020; sixteen patients underwent surgery using the MCT (MCT group) and ten patients underwent surgery using the tubularized incised plate (TIP) technique (TIP group). The operative time, blood loss, postoperative complications, normal urethral meatus rate, success rate, and Hypospadias Objective Penile Evaluation (HOPE) score were compared between the two groups. The MCT group achieved an overall satisfactory penile appearance and voiding function, with a higher rate of normal urethral meatus (15/16, 93.8%) and a lower rate of glans dehiscence (1/16, 6.2%), compared with the TIP group (70.0% and 30.0%, respectively). However, these differences were not statistically significant, possibly because of the limited number of patients (all P > 0.05). Mean postoperative HOPE scores were similar in the MCT group (mean ± standard deviation: 8.83 ± 0. 89) and TIP group (8.94 ± 0.57) (P > 0.05). No significant differences were found between the two groups in terms of blood loss and success rate, nor in the rates of various complications (e.g., fistula, urethral stricture, and glans dehiscence). In conclusion, the MCT technique appears to be feasible and reliable for repairing glans dehiscence after failed hypospadias repair.

Redo Hypospadias Repair: Comparison of Three Different Methods

PURPOSE

To evaluate the clinical data and treatment outcomes of 3 different methods for redo hypospadias surgery.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the data of 39 patients with redo hypospadias surgery between January 2010 and April 2019 at our clinic. A ventral preputial onlay flap, a preputial tubular flap, and a full thickness skin tubular graft were used in redo hypospadias surgery. We evaluated these methods regarding age, number, and type of previous repairs, catheter time, chordee, length of the urethral defect, operation time, complications, and follow-up results. T tests and Fisher's exact tests were used to compare differences between groups.

RESULTS

The mean operation age of the patients was 5.23 years. Sixteen patients had a single, 21 had 2, and 2 patients had 3 previous repairs. The position of the urethral meatus was perineal in 2, penoscrotal in 6, mid penile in 21, and distal penile in 10 patients. The initial repairs comprised 19 tubularized incised plates (TIP), 12 Mathieu procedures, 5 tubularized preputial flaps, 2 full thickness skin tubular grafts, and 1 onlay island flap repair. Eight full thickness skin tubular grafts, 18 onlay preputial island flaps, and 13 preputial tubular flaps were used for redo surgery. The success rate was 79.1%. Eight wound infections, 6 glans dehiscences, 13 fistulas, 12 meatal stenoses, and 5 urethral diverticulas were seen in the patients. The rates of these complications, Cystofix requirement, and reoperation were higher in the skin tubular graft group but this was not statistically significant (p > 0.05). One patient with graft contracture required a redo skin graft urethroplasty. The mean follow-up duration was18 months.

CONCLUSION

Preputial tissue should be preferred in the presence of redo hypospadias surgery. In the absence of preputial tissue other tissues such as oral or buccal mucosa should be preferred instead of skin grafts.