Gender identity: A psychosocial primer for providing care to patients with a disorder/difference of sex development and their families [individualized care for patients with intersex (Disorders/differences of sex development): Part 2]

A Pilot Survey of Indian Stakeholders: Parents, Doctors, and Grown-Up Patients of Disorders of Sexual Differentiation on Management Decisions and Associated Gender Dysphoria

Background and Aims

Of late, there are many legal representations from select quarters to halt all medical interventions in children with differences of sex development (DSD). In this survey on management decisions in DSD, we distil the views of Indian stakeholders: parents, physicians, and grown-up patients with DSD on their management decisions to identify decisional satisfaction or gender dysphoria.

Methods

The survey domains included the patient demographics, final diagnosis, decision on the sex of rearing, surgical interventions, opinion of the stakeholders on the preferred age of sex assignment, final sex of rearing, and agreement/disagreement about sex assignment (gender dysphoria).

Results

A total of 106 responses were recorded (66% parents, 34% grown-up patients aged 12-50 years). Among parents, 65/70 (95%) preferred the sex to be assigned soon after birth. All grown-up patients preferred sex to be assigned soon after birth. Regarding decisions on surgery, 74% of physicians and 75% of the grown-up patients felt parents should be allowed to decide interventions. Among Indian parents, 90% felt they should have the right to decide surgery in the best interest of their child for a safe social upbringing. Overall, gender dysphoria among Indian DSD patients was <1% (1/103, 0.97%).

Conclusions

The predominant preference and opinion of major Indian stakeholders (physicians, parents, and grown-up DSD patients) support the existing approach toward DSD management, including early sex assignment and necessary medical intervention.

Individualized care for patients with intersex (differences of sex development): Diagnosis and treatment of aphallia

This review discusses issues and concerns in the management of aphallia, updating status of a post-pubertal individual who required further surgery after having initial surgery for aphallia as an infant. Through this case, which discusses an 18-year-old young adult who had penile agenesis, who desired further phalloplasty involving glanuloplasty and implantation of an erectile device, we highlight the importance of periodic evaluation and close follow up. Surgery during infancy or early childhood to create a penis is important for gender development in a boy, especially if there were functional testes during fetal life, even if this surgery would only be the first stage. There is a strong probability of subsequent surgery after initial phalloplasty before puberty, even with the use of currently refined techniques. Here we discuss the changing techniques that document the ongoing, continued refinement of these procedures, highlighting that further outcome data are needed to identify ways to further optimize current techniques.

The Timing of Genital Surgery in Somatic Intersexuality: Surveys of Patients' Preferences

In recent years, intersex advocates, medical ethicists, and lawmakers have increasingly demanded a delay of genital surgery that is not acutely medically necessary in patients with somatic intersexuality to the age of consent. This study provides a review of published surveys of affected patients' own opinions on this issue. In part with search of PubMed 2000-2021, 10 pertinent surveys of patients were identified: 3 from the USA; 4 from European countries; and one each from Brazil, China, and Malaysia. All were based on samples of clinic patients, most of whom had previously undergone genital surgery. The majority of both XX and XY patients with somatic intersexuality favored early surgery, with somewhat more syndrome-specific variability in XY patients. The available survey data clearly indicate that a mandatory delay of genital surgery in all patients with somatic intersexuality to the age of consent would disregard the wishes of the majority of surveyed patients. A syndrome- and syndrome severity-specific individualized approach to surgery decisions appears more appropriate.

Fully Masculinized 46,XX Individuals with Congenital Adrenal Hyperplasia: Perspective Regarding Sex of Rearing and Surgery

Current guidelines for gender assignment for all 46,XX congenital adrenal hyperplasia (CAH) continue to be female. This decision is most challenging for individuals with a 46,XX karyotype born with (CAH) having severely masculinized genitalia (Prader 4 or 5). They may be at significant risk for quality of life (QoL) and psychological health. More outcome information currently exists for such individuals assigned male than female. Most available data for those raised females do not indicate the extent of masculinization at birth, so there are minimal outcome data to compare with those raised males. Gender dissatisfaction among those raised females may be related to the degree of prenatal androgen excess in the brain evidenced by external genital masculinization. Also, additional brain maturation after birth, especially during puberty, is impacted by postnatal androgen excess resulting from inadequate androgen suppression. The purpose of this perspective is to suggest that both female and male assignment be considered. Most who have been raised male at birth have positive adult outcomes. This consideration should occur after discussions with full disclosure to the parents. The lack of more outcome data highlights the need for further information. This perspective also suggests that surgery should be deferred whether assigned female or male at least until gender identity is apparent to preserve the potential for male sexual function and prevent irrevocable loss of sensitive erotic tissue. While the gender fluidity is recognized, it is important to consider potential subsequent need for gender reassignment and extent of masculinization, particularly at the time of gender determination.

Congenital Adrenal Hyperplasia-Current Insights in Pathophysiology, Diagnostics, and Management

Congenital adrenal hyperplasia (CAH) is a group of autosomal recessive disorders affecting cortisol biosynthesis. Reduced activity of an enzyme required for cortisol production leads to chronic overstimulation of the adrenal cortex and accumulation of precursors proximal to the blocked enzymatic step. The most common form of CAH is caused by steroid 21-hydroxylase deficiency due to mutations in CYP21A2. Since the last publication summarizing CAH in Endocrine Reviews in 2000, there have been numerous new developments. These include more detailed understanding of steroidogenic pathways, refinements in neonatal screening, improved diagnostic measurements utilizing chromatography and mass spectrometry coupled with steroid profiling, and improved genotyping methods. Clinical trials of alternative medications and modes of delivery have been recently completed or are under way. Genetic and cell-based treatments are being explored. A large body of data concerning long-term outcomes in patients affected by CAH, including psychosexual well-being, has been enhanced by the establishment of disease registries. This review provides the reader with current insights in CAH with special attention to these new developments.

Individualized care for patients with intersex (differences of sex development): part 4/5.Considering the Ifs, Whens, and Whats regarding sexual-reproductive system surgery

Issues and concerns regarding surgery of the sexual-reproductive anatomy during infancy and early childhood are discussed using four actual examples. A case of a 46, XX infant with 21 hydroxylase deficiency congenital adrenal hyperplasia (CAH) with atypical (ambiguous) genitalia is discussed regarding timing and potential harms and benefits of surgery. We present the perspective of balancing the child's rights to bodily autonomy and right to an open future versus parents' decision making authority regarding what they perceive as their child's future best interests. The second case is a newborn with complete androgen insensitivity syndrome and we discuss the harms, benefits and timing of gonadectomy. The third case examines the physical and psychological impact of penile shaft hypospadias, raising the question of whether surgery is justified to prevent what may or may not be considered a permanent disability. The fourth case involves an adult woman with classic CAH, born with a urogenital sinus and clitoromegaly, who never had genital surgery and is now requesting vaginoplasty, but not clitoral reduction. The primary message of this article, as the previous articles in this series, is to encourage patient-family centered care that individualizes treatment guided by shared decision making.