The effect of preoperative tamsulosin on ureteroscopic access in school-aged children

International Alliance of Urolithiasis (IAU) guidelines on the management of pediatric urolithiasis

The aim of this study was to construct the sixth in a series of guidelines on the treatment of urolithiasis by the International Alliance of Urolithiasis (IAU) that by providing a clinical framework for the management of pediatric patients with urolithiasis based on the best available published literature. All recommendations were summarized following a systematic review and assessment of literature in the PubMed database from January 1952 to December 2023. Each generated recommendation was graded using a modified GRADE methodology. Recommendations are agreed upon by Panel Members following review and discussion of the evidence. Guideline recommendations were developed that addressed the following topics: etiology, risk factors, clinical presentation and symptoms, diagnosis, conservative management, surgical interventions, prevention, and follow-up. Similarities in the treatment of primary stone episodes between children and adults, incorporating conservative management and advancements in technology for less invasive stone removal, are evident. Additionally, preventive strategies aiming to reduce recurrence rates, such as ensuring sufficient fluid intake, establishing well-planned dietary adjustments, and selective use pharmacologic therapies will also result in highly successful outcomes in pediatric stone patients. Depending on the severity of metabolic disorders and also anatomical abnormalities, a careful and close follow-up program should inevitably be planned in each pediatric patient to limit the risk of future recurrence rates.

One and done: Feasibility and Safety of Primary Ureteroscopy in a Pediatric Population

BACKGROUND

Pediatric urolithiasis has been increasing at rate of 4-10 % annually in the United States, most notably within adolescents and females. A significant number of patients will require surgical management of their stones. Primary ureteroscopy (URS) affords the opportunity to treat stones under a single anesthetic with lower re-treatment rates or anatomical and stone characteristic limitations compared to shockwave lithotripsy. Previous studies evaluating primary URS have been largely underpowered, are limited by stone location, and/or are not representative of the stone population in the United States.

OBJECTIVES

Primary study outcomes were the success of primary URS and patient characteristics associated with success. Secondary outcomes were the stone-free rate (SFR), 30-day emergency department (ED) visits, 30-day readmissions, and complications.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients less than 18 years of age from 2011 to 2023 who underwent primary URS. Patients were excluded if a ureteral stent was placed prior to URS or diagnostic URS was performed. A successful primary URS was considered if access to the ureter was obtained and treatment of the stone(s) completed. In failed primary URS, a ureteral stent was placed for staged management.

RESULTS

A total of 196 patients were included and primary URS was performed or attempted on 224 renal units. The median age was 15.8 (IQR 13.4-16.9) years and median follow up 8.4 (IQR 1.1-24.6) months. The success rate of primary URS was 79 %. No significant characteristics were appreciated for successful primary URS based on: overall age, <14 vs > 14 years of age, sex, body mass index, history of stones, history of endourologic procedures, preoperative alpha blockade, location of stone(s), multiple stones, type of URS, or acute treatment. In successful primary URS, the SFR was 88 % with stone size (p = 0.0001) the only predictor of having residual stones. The 30-day ED rate was 21.4 %, 30-day unplanned readmission rate was 12.5 %, and complication rate was 7.5 %. No long-term complications were appreciated.

DISCUSSION

Our success of primary URS compares favorably to previously published literature. Our SFR rate, 30-day ED visits, 30-day unplanned readmission, and complication rates are similar to other studies. Limitations of the study are its retrospective design, selection bias, and intermediate follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Primary URS can be completed safely in the majority of pediatric patients without any patient characteristics associated with success. We advocate for primary URS when possible due to the excellent SFR and potential of treating stones under a single anesthetic.

Does preoperative silodosin administration facilitate ureteral dilatation during flexible ureterorenoscopy? A randomized clinical trial

PURPOSE

To assess whether preoperative administration of silodosin can facilitate the placement of ureteral access sheath (UAS) prior to flexible ureteroscopy (F-URS) and reduce the occurrence of ureteric injury in challenging cases.

METHODS

This prospective randomized clinical trial was carried out on 147 patients diagnosed with upper ureteric stone or stone kidney, non-stented. The patients were randomly divided into two equal groups. Group A (silodosin group) included patients in whom F-URS was done with daily preoperative intake of 8 mg silodosin for 1 week and group B (placebo/control group) included patients in whom F-URS was done with daily preoperative intake of placebo tablets.

RESULTS

In group A, a total of 23 (33.3%) experienced ureteral wall injury following UAS insertion, while in group B, this occurred in 40 patients (59.7%). There was a statistically significant difference in the grade of ureteral wall injury between the two groups (P < 0.001). In the multiple regression analysis, age, operative time and silodosin were found to be significant risk factors for ureteral wall injury (P = 0.007, 0.041 and < 0.001, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

The administration of silodosin prior to retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) effectively prevented significant ureteral wall damage and reduced initial postoperative discomfort.

Management of Pediatric Urolithiasis in an Italian Tertiary Referral Center: A Retrospective Analysis

Background and Objectives: In recent years, the prevalence of pediatric urolithiasis has increased in North America and Western countries, though it is endemic in developing countries. The aim of this study is to describe the experience of a tertiary pediatric referral center in the surgical management of pediatric urolithiasis. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the experience of patients ≤ 16 years old affected by urinary stones who underwent surgery. Results: From April 2021 to September 2023, 31 pediatric patients underwent surgical procedures for stone diseases at our department: 13 preschool-aged (1-5 years) and 18 school-aged (6-16 years) children. During this period, 12 URSs, 17 RIRSs, and 2 PCNLs were recorded. Five patients had residual fragments at first, so three of them underwent a second endourological lithotripsy (2 RIRSs and 1 URS). Complete clearance was finally achieved in 27 patients. The stone composition was evaluated in 25 cases. Conclusions: Numerous innovations in the surgical treatment of pediatric urolithiasis have resulted from the development of smaller devices and new technology. Our results show how, in experienced centers, retrograde and percutaneous lithotripsy are safe and effective procedures for use in pediatric populations.

Pediatric Stone Disease: Current Trends and Future Directions

Pediatric nephrolithiasis is less common in children than in adults but the incidence has been rising rapidly, and it is now a public health and economic burden in the United States. There are challenges unique to children that should be taken into consideration when evaluating and managing pediatric stone disease. In this review, we present the current research on risk factors, emerging new technologies for treatment of stones and recent investigations on prevention of stones in this population.

Is cerebral palsy associated with successful ureteral access during the initial attempt at ureteroscopy for urolithiasis in children and young adults?

BACKGROUND

Ureteroscopy is a common treatment for urolithiasis, but initial ureteral access is not always possible, particularly in pediatrics. Clinical experience suggests that neuromuscular conditions such as cerebral palsy (CP) may facilitate access, thus avoiding the need for pre-stenting and staged procedures.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to determine if probability of successful ureteral access (SUA) during initial attempted ureteroscopy (IAU) is higher in pediatric patients with CP vs. without CP.

STUDY DESIGN

We reviewed IAU cases for urolithiasis (2010-2021) at our center. Patients with pre-stenting, prior ureteroscopy, or urologic surgical history were excluded. CP was defined using ICD-10 codes. SUA was defined as scope access to urinary tract level sufficient to reach stone. Association of CP and other factors with SUA were evaluated.

RESULTS

230 patients (45.7% male, median age: 16 years [IQR: 12-18 y], 8.7% had CP) underwent IAU, with SUA in 183 (79.6%). SUA occurred in 90.0% of patients with CP vs. 78.6% of those without CP (p = 0.38). SUA was 81.7% in patients >12 years (vs. 73.8% in those <12), and the highest SUA was in those >12 years with CP (93.3%), but these differences were not statistically significant. Renal stone location was significantly associated with lower SUA (p = 0.007). Among patients with renal stone only, SUA in those with CP was 85.7% vs. 68.9% in those without CP (p = 0.33). SUA did not differ significantly by gender or BMI.

CONCLUSIONS

CP may facilitate ureteral access during IAU in pediatric patients, but we were unable to show a statistically significant difference. Further study of larger cohorts may demonstrate whether CP or other patient factors are associated with successful initial access. Improved understanding of such factors would help preoperative counseling and surgical planning for children with urolithiasis.

Preoperative patient optimization for endourological procedures: the current best clinical practice

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Despite technological advancements in endourological surgery, there is room for improvement in preoperative patient optimization strategies. This review updates recent best clinical practices that can be implemented for optimal surgical outcomes.

RECENT FINDINGS

Outcome and complication predictions using novel scoring systems and techniques have shown to assist clinical decision-making and patient counseling. Innovative preoperative simulation and localization methods for percutaneous nephrolithotomy have been evaluated to minimize puncture-associated adverse events. Novel antibiotic prophylaxis strategies and further recognition of risk factors that attribute to postoperative infections have shown the potential to minimize perioperative morbidity. Accumulating data on the roles of preoperative stenting and selective oral alpha-blockers adds evidence to the current paradigm of preventive measures for ureteral injury.

SUMMARY

Ample tools and technologies exist that can be utilized preoperatively to improve surgical outcomes. The combination of these innovations, along with validation in larger-scale studies, presents the cornerstone of future urolithiasis management.

Are adrenergic α1- antagonists beneficial for the access of retrograde ureteral access sheath or semi-rigid ureteroscope access? A systematic review and meta-analysis

Introduction

To evaluate the clinical benefit of preoperative adrenergic α1-antagonist therapy in the management of upper urinary calculi.

Materials and methods

Publications were searched for The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, EMBASE, and MEDLINE until 1 March 2022 that related to the adrenergic α1- antagonist intake as adjunctive therapy before retrograde surgery. Dichotomous data were reported with risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and the continuous data were reported with mean difference (MD) with 95% CIs.

Results

There were nine studies with 867 patients included in this meta-analysis. Preoperative adrenergic α1- antagonists could significantly elevate the compared with the placebo. Higher successful access rate to the stone was found in patients who received preoperative adrenergic α1- antagonists than those who received the placebo (RR 1.24; 95% CI 1.17-1.33). Besides, the application of preoperative adrenergic α1- antagonists can also elevate 4th-week stone-free rate (RR 1.20; 95% CI 1.12-1.28), decrease postoperative analgesia (RR 0.30;95% CI 0.20-0.46) and result in a lower risk of overall complications (RR 0.38; 95% CI 0.24-0.61).

Conclusion

Preoperative adjunctive adrenergic α1- antagonist therapy is effective and safe in the management of retrograde surgery with a higher successful access rate and lower risk of severe complications.

Paediatric kidney stone surgery: state-of-the-art review

While urolithiasis in children is rare, the global incidence is rising, and the volume of minimally invasive surgeries being performed reflects this. There have been many developments in the technology, which have supported the advancement of these interventions. However, innovation of this kind has also resulted in wide-ranging practice patterns and debate regarding how they should be best implemented. This is in addition to the extra challenges faced when treating stone disease in children where the patient population often has a higher number of comorbidities and for example, the need to avoid risk such as ionising exposure is higher. The overall result is a number of challenges and controversies surrounding many facets of paediatric stone surgery such as imaging choice, follow-up and different treatment options, for example, medical expulsive therapy, shockwave lithotripsy, ureteroscopy, and percutaneous nephrolithotomy. This article provides an overview of the current status of paediatric stone surgery and discussion on the key topics of debate.

Paediatric stone management: innovations and standards

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The aim of this study was to discuss current trends and recent developments in the surgical management of paediatric urolithiasis.

RECENT FINDINGS

Medical expulsive therapy (MET) is considered as an option for the treatment of children with ureter stones. Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) remains as a first option for majority of kidney stones and upper ureter stones. Advances in endourology have led to increased adoption of retrograde intrarenal surgeries (RIRS) and percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL/mini-PCNL/ultra-mini-PCNL/micro-PCNL).

SUMMARY

Management of paediatric stone disease has developed significantly in the past decade. However, the evidence in the literature remains disproportional to these advances. Well designed multicentric studies are still needed to compare effectiveness and safety of these procedures.

Ureteroscopy for stone disease in the paediatric population: lessons learned and outcomes in a Nordic setting

Introduction:

Paediatric stone disease is rare in the Nordic communities. Still, the condition can require surgical intervention in the form of ureteroscopy (URS). Here, we report outcomes achieved at a regional (tertiary) centre.

Patients and methods:

Retrospective analysis was performed of consecutive patients (<18 years of age) undergoing URS for stone disease between 2010 and 2021. Outcomes of interest included stone-free rate (SFR) determined using a definition of no residual fragments ⩾ 3 mm on imaging and complications classified according to Clavien–Dindo system.

Results:

In total, 23 patients underwent 47 URS procedures for a total of 31 stone episodes. Mean age was 9 (range 1–17) years and male-to-female ratio was 6:17. Overall, 35% had at least one medical comorbidity. Ultrasound determined preoperative stone status in 87%. Mean largest index and cumulative stone sizes were 9 (range 3–40) and 12 (range 3–40) mm, respectively. Overall, 32% had multiple stones. Lower pole was the commonest stone location (39%). No patients underwent elective pre-operative stenting. Ureteral access sheaths were not used in any cases. Access to upper urinary tract at first procedure was successful in 94%. Initial and final SFR was 61% and 90%, respectively. No intra-operative complications were recorded. Overall post-operative complication rate was 17.5%. Urinary tract infection (CD II) was the commonest adverse event (12.5%).

Conclusion:

Paediatric URS can be delivered in the setting of a regional centre without compromising outcomes. This includes when carried out by adult endourologists, without routine pre-stenting and omitting use of ureteric access sheath.