Statins for primary prevention in physically active individuals: Do the risks outweigh the benefits?

Statins and renal disease progression, ophthalmic manifestations, and neurological manifestations in veterans with diabetes: A retrospective cohort study

Background

Statins increase insulin resistance, which may increase risk of diabetic microvascular complications. Little is known about the impact of statins on renal, ophthalmologic, and neurologic complications of diabetes in practice. The objective of this study was to examine the association of statins with renal disease progression, ophthalmic manifestations, and neurological manifestations in diabetes.

Methods

This is a retrospective cohort study, new-user active comparator design, that included a national Veterans Health Administration (VA) patients with diabetes from 2003 to 2015. Patients were age 30 years or older and were regular users of the VA with data encompassing clinical encounters, demographics, vital signs, laboratory tests, and medications. Patients were divided into statin users or nonusers (active comparators). Statin users initiated statins and nonusers initiated H2-blockers or proton pump-inhibitors (H2-PPI) as an active comparator. Study outcomes were: 1) Composite renal disease progression outcome; 2) Incident diabetes with ophthalmic manifestations; and 3) Incident diabetes with neurological manifestations.

Results

Out of 705,774 eligible patients, we propensity score matched 81,146 pairs of statin users and active comparators. Over a mean (standard deviation) of follow up duration of 4.8 (3) years, renal disease progression occurred in 9.5% of statin users vs 8.3% of nonusers (odds ratio [OR]: 1.16; 95% confidence interval [95%CI]: 1.12–1.20), incident ophthalmic manifestations in 2.7% of statin users vs 2.0% of nonusers (OR: 1.35, 95%CI:1.27–1.44), and incident neurological manifestations in 6.7% of statin users vs 5.7% of nonusers (OR: 1.19, 95%CI:1.15–1.25). Secondary, sensitivity, and post-hoc analyses were consistent and demonstrated highest risks among the healthier subgroup and those with intensive lowering of LDL-cholesterol.

Conclusions

Statin use in patients with diabetes was associated with modestly higher risk of renal disease progression, incident ophthalmic, and neurological manifestations. More research is needed to assess the overall harm/benefit balance for statins in the lower risk populations with diabetes and those who receive intensive statin therapy.

Life Style Intervention Improves Retinopathy Status-The Finnish Diabetes Prevention Study

The aim of the study was to find out whether participation in earlier intervention had an effect on the occurrence of retinopathy in study participants. We also examined risk factors (age, sex, weight, fasting and 2 h glucose, fasting insulin, blood pressure, serum lipids) for early retinal changes. The study included 522 individuals (mean 55 years old, range 40-64 years) with impaired glucose tolerance who were randomized into intervention (weight loss, healthy diet, and physical activity, N = 265) and control groups (N = 257). Intervention lasted for median of four years in 1993-2000, after which annual follow-up visits at study clinics were conducted. In the years 2002-2006 (at least five years after stopping intervention), fundus photography was offered for all study participants in four of five study clinics. Photographs were assessed by two experienced ophthalmologists (A.A. and K.K.), masked for the group assignment. After exclusion of poor quality photographs, the data of 211 individuals (N = 113 for intervention and N = 98 for control group) were included in the present study. The occurrence of microaneurysms was significantly higher in the control (37/98, 38%) than in the intervention group (27/113, 24%; p = 0.029). In the model, including age, sex, diabetes diagnosis before the retinal assessment, body mass index (BMI), and treatment group, the odds ratio for microaneurysms was markedly lower in intervention group (OR 0.52; 0.28-0.97, p = 0.039). The only risk factor that predicted the occurrence of microaneurysms was serum triglycerides at baseline (mean ± SD 1.9 ± 0.9 vs. 1.6 ± 0.7, mmol/L, with and without microaneurysms, respectively, p = 0.003). Triglycerides associated with decreased microaneurysms in regression analysis for age, sex, fasting glucose, and intervention group (OR 1.92, p = 0.018). Lifestyle intervention in overweight and obese individuals with impaired glucose tolerance showed decreased occurrence of retinal microaneurysms. Elevated serum triglycerides were associated to the development of early diabetic microangiopathy.

Formal comment on "Systematic review of the predictors of statin adherence for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease"

Statins have been prescribed for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease (CVD) for nearly 3 decades. Throughout this period key opinion leaders in the field have been dismayed by the high rate of non-adherence of patients to follow their statin regimen. Hope et al., [1] have addressed this issue by providing a systematic review of research on predictors of statin adherence for primary prevention of CVD. However, their review does not address the ongoing debate as to whether statin treatment is warranted for primary prevention of CVD, nor does it adequately address concerns regarding adverse effects of statins. We have therefore written a commentary which provides a broader perspective on the benefits versus harms of statin therapy. Our perspective of the literature is that non-adherence to statin treatment for primary prevention of CVD is justified because the meager benefits are more than offset by the extensive harms.