Single season re-injury risk after concussion and lower extremity injury among male, collision sport, high school athletes

Clinical Measures Associated with Subsequent Injury after Adolescent Concussion: A Prospective Cohort Study

PURPOSE

This study aimed to examine associations between clinical measures (self-reported and clinician administered) and subsequent injury rates in the year after concussion return to play (RTP) among adolescent athletes.

METHODS

We performed a prospective, longitudinal study of adolescents ages 13-18 yr. Each participant was initially assessed within 21 d of concussion and again within 5 d of receiving RTP clearance from their physician. Participants completed self-report measures: the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index and Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia, and clinician-administered measures: single- and dual-task tandem gait and reaction time (RT; simple and clinical) assessments. They then completed monthly surveys for a year after RTP, which assessed exposure to injury (sport participation) and subsequent injuries (musculoskeletal or concussions) sustained. We used Poisson regression models to calculate injury rate ratios with the number of subsequent injuries sustained as the outcome, adjusted for RTP clearance time and competitive exposures for each measure.

RESULTS

Forty-one participants were included (age = 15.5 ± 1.3 yr, 56% female, 9.6 ± 4.6 d postconcussion; 38.0 ± 31.5 d to RTP). A higher injury rate per athletic exposure was observed for simple RT ≥ 505 ms versus <505 ms (injury rate ratio = 2.96, 95% confidence interval = 1.41-6.60, P = 0.005). Injury rates did not significantly differ by Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index or Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia scores, single/dual-task tandem gait time, or clinical RT.

CONCLUSIONS

Simple RT may be one risk factor that is associated with higher rates of subsequent injury after adolescent concussion. A simple RT measure incorporated into a comprehensive concussion RTP assessment may identify some individuals at higher risk of subsequent injury in the year after concussion, although further research is needed to better understand this relationship.

NCAA football players are at higher risk of upper extremity injury after first-time concussion

BACKGROUND

Previous research has demonstrated that concussions increase the risk of subsequent lower extremity musculoskeletal injury in athletes. However, the risk of upper extremity injury in athletes' post-concussion is poorly understood.

METHODS

All concussed football players within a National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) Division I conference athletic database were identified between 2017 and 2021. After exclusions, each athlete experiencing their first concussion was then retrospectively reviewed for upper extremity injuries in the year prior to their concussion and in the year beginning at 90 days after their concussion. All upper extremity injuries were identified and the odds ratio, 95% confidence interval, and statistical significance between groups were calculated in Microsoft Excel.

RESULTS

160 de-identified football players from a single conference who were first diagnosed with concussions in the seasons from 2017 through 2021 met inclusion criteria. In these athletes the odds of upper extremity injury in year following first diagnosed concussion were 2.36 times higher than in the year prior (95% CI 1.13-4.95, p = 0.02). Shoulder was the most common site of injury with 57.7% of injuries compared to 19.2% in the hand, 15.4% in the elbow, 7.7% in the forearm, and 0% in the wrist.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates that collegiate football players are at a 2.36 times greater risk of upper extremity injury in the year following their first diagnosed concussion compared to the year preceding it. The most common site of upper extremity injury after concussion was the shoulder.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Subsequent musculoskeletal injury after concussion in National Football League players

OBJECTIVE

To assess whether National Football League (NFL) players diagnosed with a concussion have an increased risk of injury after return to football.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study analysed the hazard of subsequent time-loss lower extremity (LEX) or any musculoskeletal injury among NFL players diagnosed with a concussion in 2015-2021 preseason or regular season games compared with: (1) all non-concussed players participating in the same game and (2) players with time-loss upper extremity injury. Cox proportional hazards models were adjusted for number of injuries and concussions in the prior year, player tenure and roster position. Additional models accounted for time lost from participation after concussion.

RESULTS

There was no statistical difference in the hazards of LEX injury or any musculoskeletal injury among concussed players compared with non-concussed players, though concussed players had a slightly elevated hazard of injury (LEX injury: HR=1.12, 95% CI 0.90 to 1.41; any musculoskeletal injury: HR=1.08, 95% CI: 0.89 to 1.31). When comparing to players with upper extremity injuries, the hazard of injury for concussed players was not statistically different, though HRs suggested a lower injury risk among concussed players (LEX injury: HR=0.78, 95% CI: 0.60 to 1.02; any musculoskeletal injury: HR=0.82, 95% CI: 0.65 to 1.04).

CONCLUSION

We found no statistical difference in the risk of subsequent injury among NFL players returning from concussion compared with non-concussed players in the same game or players returning from upper extremity injury. These results suggest deconditioning or other factors associated with lost participation time may explain subsequent injury risk in concussed players observed in some settings after return to play.

Booster visits in the management of the acute musculoskeletal injuries: Transforming care to improve outcomes-A perspective review

The current healthcare delivery system for patients with acute musculoskeletal injury is failing. Current rehabilitation management of acute musculoskeletal injury typically includes physical therapy, focused on management of impairments, with an eventual transition to functional activities and release to prior level of function. At that point, formal physical therapy is often discontinued, despite the knowledge that a high percentage of patients fail to maintain preinjury level of activity and often reduce participation in regular physical activity. Further, for those who attempt to return to prior levels of pivoting and cutting activities, there is a high second injury rate. The long-term human experience is compromised by the current model of care which terminates at the point of transition to activity. This model of care fails to meet the continued needs of these patients and may result in long term deficits and potential disability. Extended care models include intermittent follow up visits after discharge from an acute episode of care and have been efficacious and cost effective in some patient populations with musculoskeletal conditions. Specifically, a type of extended care model, labeled "booster sessions," represents an opportunity to provide structured, intermittent care to assist in a smooth transition back to function, following an acute episode of care and promote a healthier life outcome. This perspective review will discuss the opportunity to transform acute musculoskeletal care to booster visit care model in an attempt to develop a more efficacious and cost-effective system of care which could be generalizable to all musculoskeletal conditions.

Lower Extremity Musculoskeletal Injuries After Concussion in Collegiate Student-Athletes

BACKGROUND

An association has been identified between concussion and lower extremity musculoskeletal injury (LEMSKI) after return to sports participation. However, the collegiate student-athlete studies have relied on relatively small single-institution studies, which limits generalizability.

PURPOSE

To assess odds of, and time to, LEMSKI after concussion in US collegiate athletes, using the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) Injury Surveillance Program (ISP).

STUDY DESIGN

Descriptive epidemiology study.

METHODS

Data from the NCAA ISP during the 2010-2011 through 2019-2020 athletic seasons were considered for analysis. Frequency distributions were examined for details related to the initial and subsequent injuries (injuries to bone, bursa, joint, ligament, muscle, or tendon). Multivariable logistic regression models and random-effects Poisson regression models examined odds of time loss (TL) and non-time loss (NTL) LEMSKI after concussion, as well as the time interval between initial concussion and subsequent LEMSKI in a single athletic season, or initial musculoskeletal injury (MSKI) and subsequent LEMSKI in a single athletic season. Analyses were performed separately for football and other sports.

RESULTS

A total of 31,556 initial injuries were recorded (football: 11,900; other sports: 19,656), which were followed by 0 or 1 injury in the same season. Overall, first injury type was not a significant predictor of subsequent LEMSKI, although certain contrasts yielded significant estimates. In football, the odds of NTL LEMSKI were higher after concussion than after upper extremity MSKI (UEMSKI; adjusted odds ratio [OR_Adj], 1.56; 95% CI, 1.06-2.31). In football, the odds of TL LEMSKI were lower after concussion than after UEMSKI (OR_Adj, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.51-0.99). No other significant effect estimates were observed for football or other sports.

CONCLUSION

First injury type, either concussion or upper extremity, was not associated with an elevated risk of LEMSKI. Specifically, the results of this study did not identify an elevated odds of LEMSKI after a concussion. However, the authors observed greater odds of NTL LEMSKI and lower odds of TL LEMSKI in football.

Concussion is not associated with elevated rates of lower-extremity musculoskeletal injuries in National Football League Players

OBJECTIVE

Emerging evidence has identified an ~2x elevated risk of musculoskeletal (MSK) injury in the year following a concussion. Most of these studies have examined a single college/university athletic department and may lack generalizability to professional sports. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to assess the odds of post-concussion MSK injury utilizing publicly available National Football League (NFL) injury reports.

METHODS

Concussions were identified through a review of published NFL injury reports during the 2015, 2016, and 2017 regular seasons. Concussed players were matched by team and position, and injuries were tracked for both groups for the remainder of the season. A chi-square analysis compared the frequency of MSK injury in both groups and a Cox Proportional Hazard model calculated the risk of sustaining a subsequent MSK injury.

RESULTS

There were 322 concussed NFL players who met inclusion criteria and were successfully matched. From the time of concussion through the remainder of the season, 21.4% of the concussed players were injured and 26.4% of control participants were injured. There was no difference in MSK injury rates (p = 0.166), and the relative risk ratio was 0.90 for subsequent injury in the concussion group. There was no difference in the time to event for subsequent MSK between the two groups (p = 0.123).

CONCLUSION

The primary finding of this study was no elevated risk of post-concussion MSK in NFL football players.