1
|
Behan LA, Amir E, Casper RF. Aromatase inhibitors for prevention of breast cancer in postmenopausal women: a narrative review. Menopause 2015; 22:342-50. [PMID: 25692874 DOI: 10.1097/gme.0000000000000426] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The increasing incidence of breast cancer (BC) worldwide has resulted in widespread interest in primary prevention therapies. A number of large randomized trials have shown that selective estrogen receptor modulators can reduce the relative risk for BC by 30% to 40% in high-risk women. In early-stage BC, aromatase inhibitors (AIs) showed a 35% relative reduction in the risk of contralateral BCs compared with tamoxifen. In this narrative review, we discuss the role of AIs in the primary prevention of BC and novel research on combination hormone therapy-medical therapy for the primary prevention of BC. METHODS Using PubMed/Medline, we comprehensively searched for studies of BC primary prevention using AIs, including studies of novel methods of prevention using combination hormone therapy-BC prevention. RESULTS Two large multicenter, prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled trials have evaluated AIs--anastrozole (International Breast Cancer Intervention Study II) and exemestane (Mammary Prevention 3)--for BC risk reduction in women at increased risk for BC, which we summarize. We identified five studies (three completed and two ongoing) of combination AI-hormone therapy that are undergoing investigation for BC risk reduction. CONCLUSIONS AIs are effective at BC risk reduction, although long-term follow-up data are required to assess whether this risk reduction will result in reduced mortality. Combination hormone therapy-AI for BC risk reduction is experimental and warrants further investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucy Ann Behan
- From the 1Division of Reproductive Sciences, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; 2Lunenfeld Tanenbaum Research Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; and 3Department of Medical Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Godinho M, Meijer D, Setyono-Han B, Dorssers LCJ, van Agthoven T. Characterization of BCAR4, a novel oncogene causing endocrine resistance in human breast cancer cells. J Cell Physiol 2011; 226:1741-9. [PMID: 21506106 DOI: 10.1002/jcp.22503] [Citation(s) in RCA: 87] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
Resistance to the antiestrogen tamoxifen remains a major problem in the management of estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. Knowledge on the resistance mechanisms is needed to develop more effective therapies. Breast cancer antiestrogen resistance 4 (BCAR4) was identified in a functional screen for genes involved in tamoxifen resistance. BCAR4 is expressed in 27% of primary breast tumors. In patients treated with tamoxifen for metastized disease high BCAR4 mRNA levels are associated with reduced clinical benefit and progression-free survival. Regarding tumor aggressiveness high BCAR4 mRNA levels are associated with a shorter metastasis free survival and overall survival. In the present study, we investigated the role of BCAR4 in endocrine resistance. Forced expression of BCAR4 in human ZR-75-1 and MCF7 breast cancer cells resulted in cell proliferation in the absence of estrogen and in the presence of various antiestrogens. Inhibition of estrogen receptor 1 (ESR1) expression with small interfering RNA (siRNA), implied that the BCAR4-induced mechanism of resistance is independent of ESR1. Highly conserved BCAR4 homologues of rhesus monkey, green monkey, and the less conserved common marmoset gene induced tamoxifen-resistant cell proliferation, in contrast to the distant BCAR4 homologues of bovine and rabbit. Injection of BCAR4-expressing ZR-75-1 cells into nude mice resulted in rapidly growing tumors. In silico analysis showed that BCAR4 mRNA is highly expressed in human placenta and oocyte, and absent in other normal tissues. In conclusion, BCAR4 is a strong transforming gene causing estrogen-independent growth and antiestrogen resistance, and induces tumor formation in vivo. Due to its restricted expression, BCAR4 may be a good target for treating antiestrogen-resistant breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marcia Godinho
- Department of Pathology, Josephine Nefkens Institute, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Bayne S, Li H, Jones MEE, Pinto AR, van Sinderen M, Drummond A, Simpson ER, Liu JP. Estrogen deficiency reversibly induces telomere shortening in mouse granulosa cells and ovarian aging in vivo. Protein Cell 2011; 2:333-46. [PMID: 21574023 DOI: 10.1007/s13238-011-1033-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 57] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2010] [Accepted: 03/21/2011] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Estrogen is implicated as playing an important role in aging and tumorigenesis of estrogen responsive tissues; however the mechanisms underlying the mitogenic actions of estrogen are not fully understood. Here we report that estrogen deficiency in mice caused by targeted disruption of the aromatase gene results in a significant inhibition of telomerase maintenance of telomeres in mouse ovaries in a tissue-specific manner. The inhibition entails a significant shortening of telomeres and compromised proliferation in the follicular granulosa cell compartment of ovary. Gene expression analysis showed decreased levels of proto-oncogene c-Myc and the telomerase catalytic subunit, telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT), in response to estrogen deficiency. Estrogen replacement therapy led to increases in TERT gene expression, telomerase activity, telomere length and ovarian tissue growth, thereby reinstating ovary development to normal in four weeks. Our data demonstrate for the first time that telomere maintenance is the primary mechanism mediating the mitogenic effect of estrogen on ovarian granulosa cell proliferation by upregulating the genes of c-Myc and TERT in vivo. Estrogen deficiency or over-activity may cause ovarian tissue aging or tumorigenesis, respectively, through estrogen regulation of telomere remodeling.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sharyn Bayne
- Department of Immunology, Central Eastern Clinical School, Monash University, Victoria 3800, Australia
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Miller WR. Markers of sensitivity, dependence and resistance to endocrine therapy for breast cancer. Expert Rev Endocrinol Metab 2011; 6:345-357. [PMID: 30754108 DOI: 10.1586/eem.11.26] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Abstract
Owing to its efficacy and relative lack of toxicities, endocrine therapy is a major treatment modality for breast cancer. However, resistance and the inability to accurately predict response are obstacles to optimal management. There is a need to identify markers of clinical response and elucidate mechanisms of resistance. In this article, evidence will be presented demonstrating that: discovery of predictive markers is dependent upon the approach employed and the application required; and mechanisms of resistance are diverse and not simply mirror images of response. Different information may be obtained according to assessment read outs and type of analysis. Tumors respond to endocrine therapy in a variety of ways and a range of end points can be used to monitor hormone dependence, sensitivity and resistance to treatment. Different forms of endocrine therapies may have differing mechanisms of action - hence, markers of sensitivity/response can vary between treatments and there may be correspondingly differing mechanisms of resistance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William R Miller
- a University of Edinburgh, 2 Stoneycroft Road, South Queensferry, West Lothian, EH30 9HX, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Miller WR. Aromatase inhibitors: prediction of response and nature of resistance. Expert Opin Pharmacother 2010; 11:1873-87. [PMID: 20497094 DOI: 10.1517/14656566.2010.487863] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
IMPORTANCE OF THE FIELD Aromatase inhibitors (AIs) are recommended for and central to endocrine management of breast cancer patients. Response rates can be high, but resistance is a major obstacle. Optimal management therefore requires accurate prediction of response and an understanding of the nature by which resistance occurs. These are the subjects of this review. AREAS COVERED IN THIS REVIEW The complications of assessing response in different clinical settings and the types of response in terms of clinical, pathological, proliferative and molecular endpoints are reviewed. The current status of predictors of response such as estrogen receptors (ERs), progesterone receptors, other markers of estrogen action, ER phosphorylation, ER coregulators and multigene signatures are assessed. Different types of resistance to AIs, their heterogeneity, diversity in mechanisms of resistance and their identification are also considered. WHAT THE READER WILL GAIN The review provides fundamental information on response and predictors of response to AIs as well as an understanding of the diversity of resistance mechanisms to such endocrine agents. TAKE HOME MESSAGES ER status is the only factor used routinely for treatment selection, but additional markers are needed to predict response. Other markers have some predictive powers, but are of limited utility. The hope is, therefore, that discovery strategies based on genome-wide searches will identify new markers. Assessments may be required both before and after a short period of treatment so that early changes can be used to predict subsequent clinical response. Mechanisms of resistance to AIs are diverse. Knowledge of specific resistance mechanisms in individual cases will be necessary if strategies to circumvent resistance are to be developed rationally. A future can be envisaged in which molecular phenotyping of individual tumors is used to decide not only which patients should be treated with AIs but also whether AIs should be used alone or in combination/sequence with other drug regimes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William R Miller
- Breast Unit Research Group, University of Edinburgh, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh EH4 2XU, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Miller WR, Larionov A. Changes in expression of oestrogen regulated and proliferation genes with neoadjuvant treatment highlight heterogeneity of clinical resistance to the aromatase inhibitor, letrozole. Breast Cancer Res 2010; 12:R52. [PMID: 20646288 PMCID: PMC2949641 DOI: 10.1186/bcr2611] [Citation(s) in RCA: 64] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2010] [Revised: 05/25/2010] [Accepted: 07/20/2010] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Clinical resistance is a major factor limiting benefits to endocrine therapy. Causes of resistance may be diverse and the mechanism of resistance in individual breast cancers is usually unknown. The present study illustrates how changes in the expression of proliferation and oestrogen-regulated genes occurring during neoadjuvant treatment with the aromatase inhibitor, letrozole, may define distinctive tumour subgroups and suggest different mechanisms of resistance in clinically endocrine resistant breast cancers. Methods Postmenopausal women with large primary oestrogen-receptor (ER)-rich breast cancers were treated neoadjuvantly with letrozole (2.5 mg daily) for three months. Clinical response was determined by ultrasound changes in tumour volume. Tumour ribonucleic acid (RNA) from biopsies taken before, after 14 days and after three months of treatment was hybridized on Affymetrix U133A chips. Changes in expression of KIAA0101, TFF3, SERPINA3, IRS-1 and TFF1 were taken as markers of oestrogen regulation and those in CDC2, CKS-2, Cyclin B1, Thymidine Synthetase and PCNA as markers of proliferation. Results Fifteen tumours with < 50% volume reduction over three months of treatment were classified as being clinically non-responsive. Gene expression changes after 14 days of treatment with letrozole revealed different patterns of change in oestrogen regulated and proliferation genes in individual resistant tumours. Tumours could be separated into three different subgroups as follows: i) nine cases in which both proliferation and oestrogen signalling signatures were generally reduced on treatment (ii) four cases in which both signatures were generally unaffected or increased with treatment and (iii) two cases in which expression of the majority of oestrogen-regulated genes decreased whereas proliferation genes remained unchanged or increased. In 14 out of 15 tumours, RNA profiles were also available after three months of treatment. Patterns of change observed after 14 days were maintained or accentuated at three months in nine tumours but changes in patterns were apparent in the remaining five cancers. Conclusions Different dynamic patterns of expression of oestrogen-regulated and proliferation genes were observed in tumours clinically resistant to neoadjuvant letrozole, thus illustrating heterogeneity of resistance and discriminating molecular sub-classes of resistant tumours. Molecular phenotyping might help to direct circumventing therapy suggesting the targeting of specific pathways in different tumour subtypes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William R Miller
- Breast Research Group, University of Edinburgh, Western General Hospital, Crewe Road South, Edinburgh EH4 2XU, UK.
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Mello-Grand M, Singh V, Ghimenti C, Scatolini M, Regolo L, Grosso E, Zambelli A, Da Prada GA, Villani L, Fregoni V, Baiardi P, Marsoni S, Miller WR, Costa A, Chiorino G. Gene expression profiling and prediction of response to hormonal neoadjuvant treatment with anastrozole in surgically resectable breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2010; 121:399-411. [DOI: 10.1007/s10549-010-0887-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2010] [Accepted: 04/01/2010] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
|
8
|
Dunbier AK, Hong Y, Masri S, Brown KA, Sabnis GJ, Palomares MR. Progress in aromatase research and identification of key future directions. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 2010; 118:311-5. [PMID: 19778609 DOI: 10.1016/j.jsbmb.2009.09.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2009] [Accepted: 09/11/2009] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
The IX International Aromatase Conference focused upon key developments in research related to the aromatase enzyme that had occurred since the last meeting. A session took place at the conclusion of conference discussing key areas for future research and issues currently facing researchers in the field. While significant progress on understanding structural elements of the enzyme and regulatory mechanisms of both the gene and protein provides an excellent basis for development of improved aromatase inhibitors and exploration of the important problem of aromatase inhibitor resistance, significant challenges remain. Increasing the speed with which findings are translated into clinical practice and finding an appropriate balance between basic and translational research were identified as areas which require further attention before the next meeting in 2010.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anita K Dunbier
- Academic Department of Biochemistry, Royal Marsden Hospital, London SW3 6JJ, United Kingdom.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Miller WR. Clinical, pathological, proliferative and molecular responses associated with neoadjuvant aromatase inhibitor treatment in breast cancer. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 2010; 118:273-6. [PMID: 19837160 DOI: 10.1016/j.jsbmb.2009.10.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2009] [Revised: 10/02/2009] [Accepted: 10/07/2009] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
Neoadjuvant treatment provides an exceptional setting in which to monitor clinical, pathological, proliferative and molecular responses to aromatase inhibitors. Sequential measurements of the primary tumour provide an accurate assessment of clinical changes and the relatively easy access to the tumour within the breast means that biopsies are available for histological and molecular measurements before and during treatment. Large randomised trials (P024 and IMPACT) together with informative non-randomised studies have demonstrated clinical responses to third generation aromatase inhibitors in 40-70% of ER-positive tumours, rates generally significantly higher than observed with tamoxifen. Pathological responses in terms of reduced cellularity/increased fibrosis are also seen in 65-75% of cases. Whilst these are more often seen in clinically responding tumours, the correlation between clinical and pathological response is not absolute. A marked feature of treatment with third generation inhibitors is a reduction in cellular proliferation. Using Ki67 as a marker, this may be observed as early as 10-14 days into treatment. Reduction in proliferation with treatment may be seen in both clinically responding and non-responding tumours, although incidence and degree of effect are higher in responding cases. Aromatase inhibitor treatment frequently fails to reduce proliferation in tumours over-expressing HER-2. In terms of molecular events, aromatase inhibitor treatment is associated with changes in expression of genes classically associated with oestrogen regulation (KIAA0101, ZWINT, IRS1 and TFF1) and cell cycle progression, most notably mitotic phase proteins (CDC2, CCNB1 and CKS2). Changes occur both in clinically responding and non-responding tumours. Although expression of no individual gene correlates absolutely with response status, expression signatures can be produced which distinguish between responding and non-responding tumours. In terms of gene ontology, terms relating to macro-molecular biosynthesis, translation and structural components of ribosomes are significantly enriched. Finally, molecular signatures can be used to illustrate the relative homogeneity of responding tumours and the disparate nature of non-responding tumours suggesting multiple and diverse pathways associated with resistance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- W R Miller
- Breast Unit Research Group, University of Edinburgh, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Aromatase Inhibitors: Potential Reproductive Implications. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2009; 16:533-9. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2009.05.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2009] [Revised: 05/11/2009] [Accepted: 05/12/2009] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
|
11
|
Menopausal estrogen deprivation activates steroid sensitive stem cells (3SC) and local estrogen biosynthesis: A model for breast cancer development. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2009. [DOI: 10.1016/j.bihy.2009.04.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/23/2023]
|
12
|
Fearmonti RM, Keyomarsi K, Hunt KK. Biomarkers in neoadjuvant trials. Cancer Treat Res 2009; 147:1-36. [PMID: 21461824 DOI: 10.1007/978-0-387-09463-2_8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
|
13
|
Affiliation(s)
- William R Miller
- University of Edinburgh, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Yau C, Benz CC. Genes responsive to both oxidant stress and loss of estrogen receptor function identify a poor prognosis group of estrogen receptor positive primary breast cancers. Breast Cancer Res 2008; 10:R61. [PMID: 18631401 PMCID: PMC2575534 DOI: 10.1186/bcr2120] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2008] [Revised: 07/02/2008] [Accepted: 07/17/2008] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Oxidative stress can modify estrogen receptor (ER) structure and function, including induction of progesterone receptor (PR), altering the biology and clinical behavior of endocrine responsive (ER-positive) breast cancer. Methods To investigate the impact of oxidative stress on estrogen/ER-regulated gene expression, RNA was extracted from ER-positive/PR-positive MCF7 breast cancer cells after 72 hours of estrogen deprivation, small-interfering RNA knockdown of ER-α, short-term (8 hours) exposure to various oxidant stresses (diamide, hydrogen peroxide, and menadione), or simultaneous ER-α knockdown and oxidant stress. RNA samples were analyzed by high-throughput expression microarray (Affymetrix), and significance analysis of microarrays was used to define gene signatures responsive to estrogen/ER regulation and oxidative stress. To explore the association of these signatures with breast cancer biology, microarray data were analyzed from 394 ER-positive primary human breast cancers pooled from three independent studies. In particular, an oxidant-sensitive estrogen/ER-responsive gene signature (Ox-E/ER) was correlated with breast cancer clinical parameters and disease-specific patient survival (DSS). Results From 891 estrogen/ER-regulated probes, a core set of 75 probes (62 unique genes) responsive to all three oxidants were selected (Ox-E/ER signature). Ingenuity pathway analysis of this signature highlighted networks involved in development, cancer, and cell motility, with intersecting nodes at growth factors (platelet-derived growth factor-BB, transforming growth factor-β), a proinflammatory cytokine (tumor necrosis factor), and matrix metalloproteinase-2. Evaluation of the 394 ER-positive primary breast cancers demonstrated that Ox-E/ER index values correlated negatively with PR mRNA levels (rp = -0.2; P = 0.00011) and positively with tumor grade (rp = 0.2; P = 9.741 × e-5), and were significantly higher in ER-positive/PR-negative versus ER-positive/PR-positive breast cancers (t-test, P = 0.0008). Regardless of PR status, the Ox-E/ER index associated with reduced DSS (n = 201; univariate Cox, P = 0.078) and, using the optimized cut-point, separated ER-positive cases into two significantly different DSS groups (log rank, P = 0.0009). Conclusion An oxidant-sensitive subset of estrogen/ER-responsive breast cancer genes linked to cell growth and invasion pathways was identified and associated with loss of PR and earlier disease-specific mortality, suggesting that oxidative stress contributes to the development of an aggressive subset of primary ER-positive breast cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christina Yau
- Buck Institute for Age Research, Redwood Boulevard, Novato, California 94945, USA.
| | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Kendall A, Anderson H, Dunbier AK, Mackay A, Dexter T, Urruticoechea A, Harper-Wynne C, Dowsett M. Impact of Estrogen Deprivation on Gene Expression Profiles of Normal Postmenopausal Breast Tissue In vivo. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2008; 17:855-63. [DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-07-2718] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
|
16
|
Miller WR. Do classical oestrogen markers predict for clinical response to endocrine therapy? Breast Cancer Res 2007. [PMCID: PMC2230527 DOI: 10.1186/bcr1817] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
|