Meniscectomy of the sternoclavicular joint: a report of two cases

Open sternoclavicular osteophyte debridement in the surgical management of sternoclavicular osteoarthritis: clinical outcome of a new procedure

INTRODUCTION

Symptomatic sternoclavicular osteoarthritis is uncommon but remains the most frequent non-traumatic condition affecting the sternoclavicular joint and tends to have a predilection for middle-aged women. It responds well to conservative management. Surgery is indicated when conservative management fails. We present the clinical outcome of open symptomatic sternoclavicular osteophyte debridement, a new operation for treating recalcitrant symptomatic sternoclavicular osteoarthritis.

METHODS

Five patients (five symptomatic sternoclavicular joints) with symptomatic sternoclavicular osteoarthritis underwent open sternoclavicular debridement following failure of conservative treatment. There were three females and two males. Mean age was 46.6 years (range 37.17-66). Four cases were primary osteoarthritis and one case was secondary to trauma. They were reviewed at mean follow-up at 35.4 months with minimum follow-up of 29 months. Assessment included Quick Disabilities of Arm Shoulder and Hand (DASH) and subjective patient satisfaction score.

RESULTS

There was no post-operative complication. Mean Quick DASH score 10.9 (range 0-29.5) at mean 35.4-month follow-up (range 29-43 months). Three patients reported excellent and two reported good outcome as per subjective satisfaction score.

CONCLUSIONS

Open sternoclavicular debridement has proved to be a simple, safe and highly effective new surgical treatment for patients with symptomatic sternoclavicular osteoarthritis unresponsive to non-operative management.

Arthroscopic Sternoclavicular Joint Diskectomy for Acute and Chronic Tears

PURPOSE

To describe the results and functional scores in a group of patients who underwent arthroscopic excision of a symptomatic sternoclavicular joint (SCJ) disk tear with a minimum follow-up period of 2 years.

METHODS

Between April 2010 and December 2014, 14 patients underwent arthroscopic excision of a torn SCJ disk. Patients whose intended surgery was an isolated diskectomy and underwent that surgery only, with no additional procedure, were included. The minimum follow-up period was 24 months. All patients underwent an arthroscopic SCJ diskectomy. Postoperatively, no immobilization was required, and the patients were encouraged to mobilize as pain permitted. The patients were assessed preoperatively and at final follow-up with the visual analog scale score for pain, Rockwood score, and QuickDASH (short version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire) score.

RESULTS

The average age at surgery was 29.4 years (range, 19-39 years). Ten of the patients had been symptom free before a specific incident, after which SCJ symptoms developed. The other 4 patients reported a gradual onset of symptoms and were considered to have chronic tears. The average duration of symptoms was 22.8 months (range, 6-48 months). At a mean follow-up of 33.4 months (range, 24-59 months), a significant improvement in the Rockwood score was noted, from 7 (range, 5-9; standard deviation [SD], 1.4) to 13.6 (range, 9-15; SD, 1.9) (P = .001) (minimal clinically important difference not described). The mean QuickDASH score improved from 23.7 points (range, 6.8-40.9 points; SD, 11.8 points) to 8 points (range, 0-29.5 points; SD, 9 points) (P = .0024) (minimal clinically important difference, 13.4 points). There were no reported complications and specifically no instability.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this series suggest that arthroscopic SCJ diskectomy is a safe and reproducible procedure for the treatment of patients with symptomatic SCJ disk tears.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, therapeutic case series.

Arthroscopic Intra-articular Disk Excision of the Sternoclavicular Joint

The sternoclavicular joint (SCJ) has a complete intra-articular disk that can be damaged either as a result of trauma or as part of ongoing degenerative joint disease. Although often asymptomatic, SCJ disk tears may lead to mechanical symptoms and pain. Previously, isolated symptomatic SCJ disk tears have only occasionally been mentioned in the literature with a few associated case reports of diskectomy by open arthrotomy. With improved imaging and availability of magnetic resonance imaging scans and the advent of SCJ arthroscopy it is now possible to treat symptomatic SCJ disk tears by arthroscopic excision. In this Technical Note, we describe the diagnosis of a torn SCJ disk and the technique of arthroscopic excision of a torn SCJ disk.

Biomechanical Comparison of Surgical Techniques for Resection Arthroplasty of the Sternoclavicular Joint

BACKGROUND

The optimal location and extent of medial clavicle resection for sternoclavicular (SC) joint resection arthroplasty are unknown.

HYPOTHESIS

Resection of the intra-articular disc alone cannot reliably decompress the SC joint, and a parallel resection technique will decompress the SC joint significantly more compared with the same amount with an oblique resection technique.

STUDY DESIGN

Controlled laboratory study.

METHODS

Force transmission through the SC joint was measured in 7 matched-pair human cadaveric SC joints in a dynamic tensile testing machine. The specimens were randomized to either a parallel or an oblique resection technique. An 80-N axial load was applied on the lateral clavicle toward the SC joint in each of the following 4 conditions: (1) intact joint, (2) after resecting the intra-articular disc, (3) after resecting 5 mm of the medial clavicle, and (4) after 10-mm resection.

RESULTS

Complete discectomy of all SC joints resulted in a significant reduction of force transmitted through the SC joint (P = .002). However, the varying anatomy of the disc was accompanied by a varying amount of joint decompression (95% CI, 29.8%-65.4%). Resecting 5 mm of the SC joint with the parallel technique decompressed the SC joint by a mean (±SD) of 76.7 ± 22.1 N compared with 37.8 ± 24.8 N with the oblique technique (P = .02). Decompression did not significantly differ between the groups after 10-mm resection (P = .18) using the parallel technique (89.4 ± 24.1 N) compared with the oblique technique (68.2 ± 31.6 N). Furthermore, 5-mm resection of the medial end of the clavicle with the parallel technique decompressed the SC joint by an amount similar to 10-mm resection with the oblique technique.

CONCLUSION

Resection of the disc alone did not reliably decompress each SC joint. Resection of 5 mm of the medial end of the clavicle with the parallel resection technique reliably decompressed the SC joint better than with the oblique resection technique.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

This study provides baseline data on SC joint resection techniques and their mechanical effects. This knowledge can be implemented in clinical practice to treat patients with symptomatic posttraumatic arthritis of the SC joint.

Arthroscopy of the sternoclavicular joint: an anatomic evaluation of structures at risk

INTRODUCTION

Recently, arthroscopy of the sternoclavicular joint (SCJ) has been described in clinical setting. The aim of this study is to examine the accessibility and safety of the SCJ by arthroscopy in a cadaveric model.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

An inferolateral and superomedial portal to the SCJ was created in 20 cadaveric specimens. After debridement, the specimens were dissected with a needle positioned in the portal tracts. The distance between the needles and bony landmarks, tendons and ligaments were measured. The integrity of the posterior capsule was evaluated macroscopically. In eight specimens, after anterior dissection, the needles were replaced by K-wires that perforated the posterior capsule to evaluate the distance to the neurovascular structures behind the SCJ.

RESULTS

Both portals were found to be safe while allowing good access to the joint. The superomedial portal went through the tendon of the sternocleidomastoideus muscle and the inferolateral portal through the pectoralis major muscle. The portals entered the capsule medial and lateral to the anterior sternoclavicular ligament. The posterior capsule was never perforated during debridement. The perforating K-wires, however, usually perforated either a major vein or artery, but were at a safe distance from the vagal nerve.

CONCLUSIONS

In this cadaver study, arthroscopy of the sternoclavicular joint could be used as a minimally invasive procedure allowing debridement of the joint without damaging the posterior capsule of the joint. If the capsule is inadvertently be breached, a major risk of neurovascular damage exists. We advise to have a backup of a cardiothoracic surgeon when performing this procedure.