Results of concomitant rotator cuff and SLAP repair are not affected by unhealed SLAP lesion

Biceps Rerouting Regardless of a Biceps-Labral Lesion During Rotator Cuff Repair Results in Lower Retear Rates and Comparable Clinical Outcomes to Subpectoral Biceps Tenodesis

PURPOSE

To evaluate the radiographic and clinical outcomes when rerouting a pathologic biceps during arthroscopic rotator cuff repair by comparing it with concomitant subpectoral biceps tenodesis (SPBT).

METHODS

This retrospective, historical cohort study was conducted with patients who underwent an arthroscopic repair of a full-thickness rotator cuff tear, with intraoperative confirmation of biceps pathology including partial tears, subluxation, pulley lesions, or type II SLAP lesions. Until May 2018, such patients were treated with concomitant subpectoral tenodesis (group SPBT). Afterward, biceps rerouting (BR) was done regardless of biceps pathology (group BR) without biceps or SLAP repair. Radiographic parameters, including fatty degeneration, acromiohumeral distance, Sugaya classification, and retears, were evaluated using preoperative and 1-year postoperative magnetic resonance imaging results. Clinical evaluation with a minimum 2-year follow-up included pain visual analog scale, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons, Simple Shoulder Test, and Constant-Murley scores. Whether individual patients exceeded these scores' minimal clinically important difference also was determined.

RESULTS

A total of 64 patients (group SPBT = 32; group BR = 32) were included in the final analysis. The duration of clinical follow-up was 36.2 ± 9.3 months in group SPBT and 29.4 ± 6.9 months in the BR group (P = .002). Compared with group SPBT, group BR demonstrated a significantly lower retear rate (SPBT vs BR: 34.4% vs 12.5%, P = .039). In the BR group, 8 of 32 (25%) patients demonstrated a postoperative LHBT tear. The 4 cuff retears in group BR only took place within these patients. Other postoperative radiographic and clinical outcomes were comparable between the groups. Within each group, significant postoperative improvements were demonstrated (P < .05 for all clinical scores).

CONCLUSIONS

Even in the presence of a pathologic LHBT and/or a type II SLAP lesion, augmenting the rotator cuff repair with BR significantly reduced retear rates while achieving clinical scores comparable with SPBT in a minimum 2-year follow-up.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, retrospective comparative study.

Effect of cigarette smoking on the maintenance of reduction after treatment of acute acromioclavicular joint dislocation with hook plate fixation

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to determine the association between smoking and clinical outcomes of hook plate fixation for acute acromioclavicular (AC) joint injuries.

METHODS

This study retrospectively investigated 82 patients who underwent hook plate fixation for acute AC joint dislocation between March 2014 to June 2022. The patients were grouped by smoking status, with 49 in group N (nonsmokers) and 33 in group S (smokers). Functional scores and active range of motion were compared among the groups at the 1-year follow-up. Coracoclavicular distance (CCD) was measured, and difference with the uninjured side was compared at initial injury and 6 months after implant removal.

RESULTS

No significant differences were observed between the two groups in demographic factors such as age and sex, as well as parameters related to initial injury status, which included time from injury to surgery, the preoperative CCD difference value, and the Rockwood classification. However, the postoperative CCD difference was significantly higher in group S (3.1±2.6 mm) compared to group N (1.7±2.4 mm). Multivariate regression analysis indicated that smoking and the preoperative CCD difference independently contributed to an increase in the postoperative CCD difference. Despite the radiographic differences, the postoperative clinical outcome scores and active range of motion measurements were comparable between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Smoking had a detrimental impact on ligament healing after hook plate fixation for acute AC joint dislocations. This finding emphasizes the importance of smoking cessation to optimize reduction maintenance after AC joint injury. Level of evidence: III.

Retear After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair Results in Functional Outcome Deterioration Over Time

PURPOSE

This study aimed to evaluate the effect of retear on long-term functional outcomes and glenohumeral joint osteoarthritis (OA) progression after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ASRCR).

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 201 patients who underwent ASRCR and were followed up for at least 5 years. Rotator cuff tendon structural integrity was evaluated using magnetic resonance imaging and/or ultrasonography. Pain, active range of motion, and the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form (ASES) were evaluated for functional outcomes. To evaluate deterioration over time, the minimal clinically important difference value of pain and ASES were used.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up period was 8.6 ± 2.2 years and overall retear rate was 21.4%. OA progression was strongly associated with retear (odds ratio 5.1, P < .001). Functional outcomes at the 2-year postoperative follow-up significantly improved compared to the preoperative status (all P < .017), regardless of retear. However, the retear group presented worse functional outcomes at the final follow-up (pain: 3.1 ± 2.6; ASES: 72.0 ± 17.4) than at the 2-year postoperative follow-up (pain: 1.2 ± 2.3, P = .014; ASES: 91.1 ± 9.9, P= .015) than the healed tendon group at final follow-up (pain: .6 ± 1.7; P < .001; ASES 95.5 ± 11.8; P < .001). The time for deterioration of pain (healed group vs. retear group: 5.5 ± 0.5 vs. 10.6 ± 0.4 years; P < .001) and ASES (healed group vs. retear group: 7.5 ± 0.5 vs. 12.8 ± 0.2 years; P < .001) decreased in the retear group.

CONCLUSIONS

The functional status improved after ASRCR in short- and long-term follow-up, regardless of retear. However, retear was strongly associated with OA progression, and long-term functional outcomes deteriorated over time in retear cases, which was not observed during short-term follow-up.

STUDY DESIGN

III, retrospective cohort study.

Arthroscopic Revision Rotator Cuff Repair: The Role of Previously Neglected Subscapularis Tears

BACKGROUND

Concomitant full-thickness tear of the subscapularis tendon is often neglected during primary posterosuperior rotator cuff repair, and its significance has not been investigated by any previous clinical study.

PURPOSE

To investigate (1) the clinical and radiological outcomes of revision arthroscopic rotator cuff repair and (2) the number of neglected concomitant subscapularis full-thickness tears in the revision of posterosuperior rotator cuff retears and their structural integrity after repair.

STUDY DESIGN

Case series, Level of evidence, 4.

METHODS

This study retrospectively examined 58 patients who underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff revision for a retear of a previously repaired posterosuperior rotator cuff. Preoperative and postoperative functional scores and active range of motion (ROM) were assessed. The initial and most recent follow-up magnetic resonance imaging scans before revision and arthroscopic findings at the time of primary repair were reviewed to determine whether the concomitant subscapularis tear was newly developed or preexisting. Final confirmation of the tendon's full-thickness tear was made during the revision procedure.

RESULTS

At final follow-up, mean functional shoulder scores and ROM improved significantly compared with the preoperative values (P < .001). Among the 58 revision cases, 25 (43.1%) had a neglected full-thickness tear of the subscapularis tendon. The fatty infiltration grade of the neglected subscapularis tear progressed from a mean of 1.1 before primary repair to a mean of 1.6 before revision, and the change indicated statistically significant deterioration (P < .001). Despite clinical improvement after revision surgery, the retear rate was considerable in the re-repaired cuff tendons (37.9%) as well as for the repaired concomitant subscapularis tears (24%).

CONCLUSION

Among revision rotator cuff repairs, 43.1% had neglected subscapularis tears, and fatty infiltration of these initially neglected subscapularis tendons showed further progression at the time of revision. The retear rate after the repair of neglected subscapularis tears was higher than expected. Thus, detecting and treating subscapularis tear via meticulous preoperative evaluation and thorough inspection during primary arthroscopy are essential.

Clinical Outcomes for Isolated Subscapularis Tears With Advanced Fatty Infiltration: Nonoperative Treatment Versus Arthroscopic Single-Row Repair

Background:

No study has investigated the treatment outcomes of isolated subscapularis tears with advanced fatty infiltration and tear progression to the supraspinatus tendon.

Purpose:

To assess the natural progression of isolated subscapularis tears with advanced fatty infiltration and compare clinical outcomes between nonoperative and operative treatment.

Study Design:

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods:

This study included 52 patients who received either operative (group A) or nonoperative (group B) treatment at our institution for isolated subscapularis full-thickness tears with grade 3 or 4 advanced fatty infiltration. All study patients had a minimum 2-year follow-up. The following 4 functional measures were used: visual analog scale for pain, Subjective Shoulder Value, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, and University of California Los Angeles score. The modified belly-press test was used to assess subscapularis muscle strength. In group A, structural integrity was evaluated using magnetic resonance imaging at 6 months after surgery. In addition, ultrasonographic evaluation was performed on both groups during the follow-up period to assess tear progression into the supraspinatus tendon.

Results:

At initial presentation, all functional assessment scores were significantly worse in group A versus group B (P ≤ .05 for all 4 scores). When we compared the mean change in scores before treatment versus after treatment, the group A patients were found to have significantly greater improvement than group B patients (P < .001 for all 4 scores); however, no significant difference was seen in final outcome scores between the groups. Although a high retear rate of 78.6% (22/28) was identified in group A, both groups showed no further tear progression to the supraspinatus tendon at the final ultrasonographic evaluation.

Conclusion:

For isolated subscapularis tears with advanced fatty infiltration, clinical improvement was seen with both nonoperative and operative treatment. Although the operatively treated group started with lower baseline scores, there were no significant differences in outcomes at final follow-up. Considering the high retear rate even after repair, surgical treatment of these lesions may not be warranted. Early detection and prompt repair of subscapularis tears, before the lesion becomes advanced with grade 3 or 4 fatty infiltration, are important for better outcomes.

Anterior rotator cable disruption does not affect outcomes in rotator cuff tear with subscapularis involvement

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to compare clinical and radiological outcomes after arthroscopic repair of two different rotator cuff tear configurations: anterosuperior rotator cuff tear and rotator cuff tears with subscapularis involvement. It was hypothesized that, although both tear configurations would show significant improvement in clinical outcomes after arthroscopic repair, the rotator cuff tears with subscapularis involvement where the anterior rotator cable maintains its integrity would have better clinical outcomes and structural integrity.

METHODS

This study included 226 patients who underwent arthroscopic repair of anterosuperior rotator cuff tears (n = 107, group A) and rotator cuff tears with subscapularis involvement (n = 119, group B). The visual analog scale (VAS) pain score, subjective shoulder value (SSV), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA) shoulder score, and active range of motion (ROM) were assessed. Modified belly press test was performed to assess the strength of the subscapularis muscle. Cuff integrity was evaluated using magnetic resonance arthrography or computed tomographic arthrography at 6 months after operation.

RESULTS

At 3-year follow-up, the VAS score, SSVs, ASES scores, UCLA shoulder scores, active ROM, and modified belly press test showed significant improvement in both groups (p < 0.001). However, these improvements showed no statistical significance between the two groups. On follow-up radiologic evaluations, no significant difference in re-tear rates between group A (25 of 107, 23.4%) and group B (23 of 119, 19.3%) was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of anterior cable involvement of the anterosuperior rotator cuff tear did not affect postoperative clinical outcomes and re-tear rate compared to rotator cuff tears with subscapularis involvement where the anterior cable integrity was maintained, although the anterosuperior rotator cuff tear was associated with more significant preoperative supraspinatus fatty infiltration. Therefore, the present study determined that it would not be necessary to differentiate treatment protocols between these patterns.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Comparing clinical outcomes between rotator cuff repairs, SLAP repairs, and combined repairs

BACKGROUND

Superior labrum lesion from anterior to posterior (SLAP) often presents together with other shoulder pathologies such as rotator cuff tear (RCT), but it is uncertain if repairing both SLAP and RCT has superior clinical outcomes over isolated repairs of SLAP and RCT.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study with prospectively collected data, reviewing 157 patients who underwent arthroscopic repair of either RCT, SLAP (type II lesion), or both. Before surgery and after 6 weeks, 12 weeks, and 24 weeks, shoulder objective range of motion and strength were measured, patient-reported function and pain was assessed by the modified L'Insalata questionnaire with a Likert scale, and complications after each repair were examined.

RESULTS

At 24 weeks after surgery, the combined group (n = 22) and SLAP group (n = 47) had significantly higher forward flexion (165° ± 4° and 167° ± 4° vs. 154° ± 3°, P = .01 and P = .01), external rotation strength (82 ± 6 N, 81 ± 6 N vs. 61 ± 3 N, P = .01 and P = .01), and abduction strength (94 ± 14 N, 78 ± 8 N vs. 53 ± 3 N, P = .001 and P = .02) compared with the rotator cuff tear repair (RCR) group (n = 88). The combined group also had stronger internal rotation than the RCR group (107 ± 12 N vs. 72 ± 4 N, P = .02). Function and pain improved from "severe-moderate" to "moderate-mild" in all groups after surgery.

CONCLUSION

Repairing RCT and SLAP tears together results in significant clinical benefits compared to repairing just RCT and analogous results against SLAP-only repair.

Arthroscopic Repair of the Isolated Subscapularis Full-Thickness Tear: Single- Versus Double-Row Suture-Bridge Technique

BACKGROUND

No clinical comparative study has addressed isolated subscapularis tears after arthroscopic repair with either single-row or double-row suture-bridge technique.

PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS

The purpose of this study is to compare clinical outcomes and structural integrity after arthroscopic repair of an isolated subscapularis full-thickness tear with either the single-row technique or the double-row suture-bridge technique. The authors hypothesized that there would be no significant differences in clinical outcomes and structural integrity between approaches.

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

This study included 56 patients who underwent arthroscopic repair of an isolated subscapularis full-thickness tear with grade II or less fatty infiltration in the subscapularis muscle with either a single-row technique (n = 31) or a double-row suture-bridge technique (n = 25). Functional outcomes were assessed with the visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, Subjective Shoulder Value (SSV), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) shoulder score, and active range of motion. Magnetic resonance arthrography (MRA) or computed tomographic arthrography (CTA) was performed 6 months after surgery to assess the structural integrity of the repaired tendon.

RESULTS

At the 2-year follow-up, all scoring parameters applied (VAS, SSV, ASES, and UCLA), subscapularis strength, and active range of motion improved significantly in both groups as compared with preoperative values ( P < .001). However, there were no significant differences between groups in any of these clinical outcome measurements (VAS, 1.2 vs 1.1; SSV, 91.3 vs 91.8; ASES, 91.0 vs 91.4; UCLA, 31.9 vs 32.1). On follow-up MRA or CTA, the overall retear rate did not differ significantly between the single-row group (13%, 4 of 31) and the double-row group (12%, 3 of 25).

CONCLUSION

Arthroscopic single-row repair and double-row suture-bridge repair of isolated full-thickness subscapularis tears both yielded satisfactory clinical outcomes and structural integrity with no significant differences among patients with good muscle quality.

Arthroscopic debridement for septic arthritis of the shoulder joint: post-infectious arthritis is an inevitable consequence?

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to compare clinical outcomes and development of post-infectious arthritis of the shoulder joint after single (Group S) or repeated (Group R) arthroscopic debridement surgeries. We hypothesized that (1) repeated surgeries might be attributable to initial subchondral involvement resulting from septic arthritis and (2) the repeated surgery group would exhibit a higher incidence of post-infectious arthritic changes and inferior clinical outcomes due to prolonged resolution of the infection.

METHODS

This study included 42 patients (single surgery, n = 29; repeated surgery, n = 13) who underwent arthroscopic debridement for septic arthritis and had a minimum of 2 years of postoperative follow-up data. All patients underwent preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with gadolinium enhancement to evaluate subchondral bone involvement suspicious for osteomyelitis secondary to septic arthritis and extension of infection around the glenohumeral joint. Functional and radiological outcomes were assessed.

RESULTS

Group S experienced a shorter duration (25.4 days) of infection than Group R (39.7 days) (p = 0.002). Increased signal intensity in the subchondral bone on preoperative MRI was identified in 9 patients (31%) in Group S and 5 patients (38%) in Group R. Post-infectious arthritic changes developed in 6 (21%) and 5 (38%) in Groups S and R, respectively. However, there were no significant differences between groups. At the final follow-up, there were no significant differences in functional assessments.

CONCLUSION

Despite a prolonged period of infection in the repeated surgery group, there was no significant difference in development of post-infectious arthritic changes or clinical outcomes in patients requiring single or repeated surgeries.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Retrospective comparative study, III.

Concomitant coracoplasty during arthroscopic subscapularis repair does not yield better clinical outcomes and structural integrity

PURPOSE

Few studies have examined whether concomitant coracoplasty is necessary to improve clinical and radiological outcomes after arthroscopic subscapularis repair. The purpose of this study was to compare clinical outcomes and structural integrity after arthroscopic repair of isolated subscapularis full-thickness tear, either with or without concomitant coracoplasty.

METHODS

This study included 62 patients who underwent arthroscopic subscapularis repair either with coracoplasty (Group A, 35 patients) or without coracoplasty (Group B, 27 patients). Preoperative and postoperative visual analog scale pain scores, subjective shoulder values, University of California at Los Angeles shoulder scores, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeon scores, subscapularis strength, and shoulder active range of motion (ROM) were assessed. Postoperative magnetic resonance arthrography (MRA) or computed tomographic arthrography (CTA) was performed 6 months postoperatively for structural integrity assessment.

RESULTS

At 2-year follow-up, all functional scores and ROM improved significantly in both groups compared with preoperative values (p < 0.001). However, none of these values differed significantly between groups. On follow-up MRA or CTA images, although postoperative coracohumeral distance was significantly greater in Group A (8.4 mm ± 2.3 mm versus 7.0 mm ± 2.0 mm) (p = 0.018), the re-tear rates were not significantly different between groups (5/35 (14%) in Group A and 4/27 (15%) in Group B).

CONCLUSIONS

For isolated subscapularis full-thickness tears, concomitant coracoplasty with arthroscopic repair did not produce better clinical outcomes or structural integrity than repair without coracoplasty. This suggests that concomitant coracoplasty may not be imperative during arthroscopic repair of isolated subscapularis full-thickness tears.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Clinical outcomes of non-operative treatment for patients presenting SLAP lesions in diagnostic provocative tests and MR arthrography

PURPOSE

In the present prospective study, the functional outcomes of non-operative treatment were evaluated in patients aged between 30 and 45 years presenting SLAP lesion in diagnostic provocative tests and magnetic resonance (MR) arthrography.

METHODS

Forty-six patients with a symptomatic SLAP lesion who participated in recreational level of sports were prospectively enroled. SLAP lesion was diagnosed using combinations of several clinical tests and MR arthrography findings. All patients were treated with intra-articular corticosteroid injections, followed by rotator cuff and periscapular muscle-strengthening exercises. Patients with persistent discomfort after second injection underwent arthroscopic SLAP repair. Functional outcomes were evaluated using ASES and Constant scores, and pain and satisfaction for visual analogue scale (VAS).

RESULTS

Pain had significantly improved from 5.2 ± 2.2 to 1.0 ± 1.1 (p < 0.001) in all patients after the first corticosteroid injection. SLAP symptoms relapsed in 12 patients at an average of 2.4 months after the first injection. Symptoms were relieved in 5 of 12 patients after the second injection and strengthening exercises. The remaining seven patients underwent arthroscopic SLAP repair. Thirty-nine patients (85 %) who were treated non-operatively showed improved VAS, Constant, and ASES scores at final follow-up (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Non-operative treatment with an appropriate regimen provided satisfactory clinical outcomes in middle-aged patients with symptomatic SLAP lesions and should be considered before recommending operative treatment.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Non-operative management using combined intra-articular corticosteroid injection with rotator cuff and periscapular strengthening exercises could be applied as primary treatment for patients with symptomatic SLAP lesion who participate in recreational level of sports.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for four-part proximal humerus fracture in elderly patients: can a healed tuberosity improve the functional outcomes?

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to investigate whether healed tuberosities yield better rotational range of motion (ROM) and functional outcomes compared with unhealed tuberosities after reverse shoulder arthroplasty in elderly patients with comminuted proximal humerus fractures.

METHODS

This study included 38 patients who underwent reverse arthroplasty because of 4-part proximal humerus fractures; 14 patients had healed tuberosities (group A) and 24 patients had unhealed tuberosities (group B). Functional assessments included visual analog scale pain score, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, Constant score, and active ROM.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in the patients' demographics between the 2 groups. At final follow-up, no significant differences were found between groups in visual analog scale score (group A, 1.4; group B, 1.6; P = .647), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score (74.3 and 70.7; P = .231), and Constant score (67.9 and 63.9; P = .228) and ROM with forward flexion and internal rotation. However, in external rotation, there was a significant difference between groups (29° and 10° in external rotation with the elbow at the side [P < .001]; 25° and 7° in external rotation with shoulder abduction [P < .001]).

CONCLUSION

After reverse shoulder arthroplasty for 4-part proximal humerus fracture, tuberosities were healed in an anatomic position in 37% of patients. However, there were no significant differences in functional outcomes and ROM between the 2 groups, with the exception of external rotation, which was better in the healed tuberosity group. Therefore, tuberosity healing is not a prerequisite for satisfactory outcomes after reverse shoulder arthroplasty for 4-part proximal humerus fractures in elderly patients.

Arthroscopic Repair of Anterosuperior Massive Rotator Cuff Tears: Does Repair Integrity Affect Outcomes?

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to investigate clinical outcomes and structural integrity after arthroscopic repair of anterosuperior massive rotator cuff tears (RCTs) and to compare clinical outcomes between healed and retear groups.

HYPOTHESIS

The authors hypothesized that although both groups would exhibit improved clinical outcomes compared with their preoperative status, the healed group would have better clinical outcomes than the retear group, and in the retear group, the subscapularis retear subgroup would have inferior outcomes compared with the intact subscapularis repair subgroup.

STUDY DESIGN

Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

This study included 73 of 90 eligible patients who underwent arthroscopic repair of an anterosuperior massive RCT. Functional outcomes after 2-year follow-up were assessed using the visual analog scale (VAS) pain score, subjective shoulder value (SSV), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) shoulder score, and active range of motion. Patients were assigned to the healed group (group H, n = 34) or retear group (group R, n = 39) based on magnetic resonance arthrography results at 6 months postoperatively. Group R was composed of subgroup R1 (subscapularis retear) and subgroup R2 (intact subscapularis repair).

RESULTS

Retearing occurred in 53% of patients. At 2-year follow-up, group H exhibited better outcomes for all functional scores versus group R, respectively ( P < .001): VAS pain score (1.0 vs 2.1), SSV (90.2 vs 77.4), ASES score (90.8 vs 76.6), and UCLA shoulder score (31.0 vs 24.9). Within both groups, all scores improved significantly compared with preoperative values ( P < .001). At follow-up, group H had significantly better forward flexion ( P = .018) and internal rotation ( P = .002) than group R; within both groups, active range of motion improved in all planes compared with the preoperative condition ( P < .001). Subgroup R1 exhibited inferior outcomes versus subgroup R2, respectively: VAS pain score (2.6 vs 1.5; P = .012), ASES score (70.9 vs 83.6; P = .013), SSV (70.9 vs 85.4; P = .005), and UCLA shoulder score (22.0 vs 28.5; P = .001).

CONCLUSION

After arthroscopic repair of anterosuperior massive RCTs, 53% of patients exhibited retearing. The healed group had better functional outcomes than the retear group. The subscapularis retear subgroup exhibited significantly inferior outcomes compared with the intact subscapularis repair subgroup.

Isolated Subscapularis Repair in Irreparable Posterosuperior Massive Rotator Cuff Tears Involving the Subscapularis Tendon

BACKGROUND

No previous study has examined whether isolated subscapularis tendon repair in irreparable posterosuperior massive rotator tears involving the subscapularis tendon in relatively young patients without arthritis can yield satisfactory outcomes.

HYPOTHESIS

We hypothesized that this procedure would produce favorable outcomes in patients who might otherwise be candidates for reverse arthroplasty.

STUDY DESIGN

Case series; Level of evidence, 4.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 24 patients in their 50s and 60s, without shoulder arthritis, who underwent arthroscopic isolated subscapularis repair for an irreparable massive rotator cuff tear involving the subscapularis tendon. Preoperative and postoperative visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores, subjective shoulder values (SSVs), University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA) shoulder scores, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) scores, subscapularis strength (modified bell-press test; maximum of 5), and shoulder active range of motion (ROM) were assessed. Postoperative magnetic resonance arthrography (MRA) was performed 6 months postoperatively to assess structural integrity of the repaired subscapularis.

RESULTS

At a mean 34.8 months (range, 24-49 months) of follow-up, VAS pain scores (improved from 7.1 to 2.5), SSVs (33.3 to 75.2), ASES scores (35.9 to 76.0), UCLA shoulder scores (11.6 to 24.8), subscapularis strength, and ROM were significantly improved compared with preoperative measurements ( P < .001). Subscapularis muscle strength improved from 3.7 to 4.2 ( P < .001). For active ROM, forward flexion and internal rotation improved significantly ( P < .001); however, external rotation exhibited no significant improvement. Follow-up MRA was performed in 22 patients (92%) and showed retear of the repaired subscapularis in 6 (27% of the 22).

CONCLUSION

Isolated repair of the subscapularis tendon in irreparable massive rotator cuff tears involving the subscapularis tendon yielded satisfactory short-term outcomes and structural integrity in patients in their 50s and 60s without arthritis. If patients with irreparable massive rotator cuff tears involving the subscapularis tendon are relatively young or have minimal concomitant arthritis, this repair can be worthwhile.

Outcomes of Arthroscopic Decompression of Spinoglenoid Cysts Through a Subacromial Approach

PURPOSE

To describe a spinoglenoid cyst decompression technique through a subacromial approach and its clinical outcomes after 2 years of follow-up.

METHODS

From March 2008 to October 2013, 26 patients underwent arthroscopic decompression of a spinoglenoid ganglion cyst with and/or without superior labral anterior to posterior repair, and patients who were available for minimum of 2 years of follow-up were included. For functional assessments, the visual analog scale (VAS) pain score, subjective shoulder value (SSV), University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA) shoulder score, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeon (ASES) score, and shoulder active range of motion were used to compare preoperative and postoperative follow-up values. Follow-up magnetic resonance arthrography was taken at 6 months postoperatively to evaluate incomplete decompression or recurrence of the cyst.

RESULTS

In total, 21 patients were included in this study. At the 2-year follow-up, the VAS, SSV, ASES, and UCLA shoulder scores significantly improved compared with preoperative values (P < .001): VAS improved from 3.5 to 0.7 (P < .001); SSV improved from 62.9 to 93.1 (P < .001); ASES score improved from 64.3 to 94.4 (P < .001); UCLA shoulder score improved from 21.6 to 32.9 (P < .001). Also, active forward flexion improved from 153° to 158° (P = .014), and external rotation improved from 55° to 57° (P = .042) significantly, with the exception of internal rotation. The follow-up magnetic resonance arthrography was performed in 18 patients (86%), and there was no recurrence of the spinoglenoid notch cyst.

CONCLUSIONS

For spinoglenoid cyst decompression, the subacromial approach was found to be effective, yielding satisfactory clinical outcomes without recurrence.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, therapeutic case series.

Subsequent Shoulder Surgery After Isolated Arthroscopic SLAP Repair

PURPOSE

To quantify the incidence of and identify the risk factors for subsequent shoulder procedures after isolated SLAP repair.

METHODS

New York's Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System database was searched between 2003 and 2014 to identify individuals with the sole diagnosis of a SLAP lesion who underwent isolated arthroscopic SLAP repair. Patients were longitudinally followed up for a minimum of 3 years to analyze for subsequent ipsilateral shoulder procedures.

RESULTS

Between 2003 and 2014, 2,524 patients met our inclusion criteria. After 3 to 11 years of follow-up, 10.1% of patients (254 of 2,524) underwent repeat surgical intervention on the same shoulder as the initial SLAP repair. The mean time to repeat shoulder surgery was 2.3 ± 2.1 years. Subsequent procedures included subacromial decompression (35%), debridement (26.7%). repeat SLAP repair (19.7%), and biceps tenodesis or tenotomy (13.0%). After isolated SLAP repair, patients aged 20 years or younger were more likely to undergo arthroscopic Bankart repair (odds ratio [OR], 2.91; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.36-6.21; P = .005), whereas age older than 30 years was an independent risk factor for subsequent acromioplasty (OR, 2.3; 95% CI, 1.4-3.7; P < .001) and distal clavicle resection (OR, 2.5; 95% CI, 1.1-5.5; P = .030). The need for a subsequent procedure was significantly associated with Workers' Compensation cases (OR, 2.4; 95% CI, 1.7-3.2; P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

We identified a 10.1% incidence of subsequent surgery after isolated SLAP repair, often related to an additional diagnosis, suggesting that clinicians should consider other potential causes of shoulder pain when considering surgery for patients with SLAP lesions. In addition, the number of isolated SLAP repairs performed has decreased over time, and management of failed SLAP repair has shifted toward biceps tenodesis or tenotomy over revision SLAP repair in more recent years.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, case-control study.

Surgical Results of Delaminated Rotator Cuff Repair Using Suture-Bridge Technique With All-Layers or Bursal Layer-Only Repair

BACKGROUND

There are no known studies that have investigated the effect on delaminated rotator cuff tears of bursal layer-only repair when full-thickness repair would put the articular layer under tension, compared with all-layers repair when full-thickness repair is feasible.

HYPOTHESIS

Better outcomes will be seen in the bursal layer-only repair, as the articular layer would be under tension when repaired onto its footprint during the all-layers repair.

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study; Level of evidence 3.

METHODS

This study included 112 patients who underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair for posteriorly delaminated tears of either all layers (group A) or the bursal layer alone (group B). If the articular layer was able to be reduced onto its footprint, the patient was assigned to group A; if such reduction was not possible or was only marginally possible under significant tension, the patient was assigned to group B. Pain scored on a visual analog scale (VAS) was assessed, as were subjective shoulder value (SSV), University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) shoulder score, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, and shoulder active range of motion (ROM). Postoperative magnetic resonance arthrography (MRA) or computed tomographic arthrography (CTA) was undertaken 6 months postoperatively for structural integrity assessment.

RESULTS

After 2 years, the VAS pain score (group A, from 6.5 to 1.2; group B, from 6.4 to 1.2), SSV (group A, from 38.3 to 89.4; group B, from 38.0 to 90.1), ASES score (group A, from 36.4 to 90.4; group B, from 38.0 to 90.8), UCLA shoulder score (group A, from 15.3 to 30.7; group B, from 15.0 to 31.3), and ROM improved significantly in both groups compared with preoperative values (P < .001). However, none of these values differed significantly between groups. On follow-up MRA or CTA images, there was no significant difference in the retear rate between group A (28%; 16/57) and group B (24%; 11/45).

CONCLUSION

The all-layers repair did not produce better clinical outcomes or structural integrity than the bursal layer-only repair. The study findings indicate that if repair of the articular layer is possible only under significant tension or is not reparable, rather than all-layers repair by force, bursal-layer repair without incorporating the articular layer may produce comparable clinical outcomes and structural integrity in the delaminated rotator cuff tear.

External rotation and active supination CT arthrography for the postoperative evaluation of type II superior labral anterior to posterior lesions

PURPOSE

To evaluate the effectiveness of external rotation and active supination CT arthrography in postoperative evaluation by comparing it with neutral CT arthrography and analyzing its agreement with postoperative clinical results after the repair of type II superior labral anterior to posterior (SLAP) lesions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 25 patients who had undergone CT arthrography in neutral, external rotation and active supination position at least 1 year after the arthroscopic repair of SLAP lesions were enrolled. Two radiologists independently evaluated the status of the repaired SLAP lesions with neutral CT arthrography and then with external rotation and active supination CT arthrography.

RESULTS

Five patients had residual symptoms and positive findings upon SLAP-specific examinations. Agreements between the presence of symptoms and radiologic diagnoses based on neutral CT arthrography were insignificant for reader 1 (κ = 0.138, p = n.s.) and significant for reader 2 (κ = 0.328, p = 0.027). However, agreements were highly significant in the analysis following the evaluation of external rotation and active supination CT arthrography for both readers (κ = 0.694, p < 0.001 in reader 1; κ = 0.783, p < 0.001 in reader 2).

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of contrast-filled gaps between the labrum and glenoid on neutral CT arthrography after SLAP repair is frequent with satisfactory clinical outcomes. Gaps without additional widening upon external rotation and active supination CT arthrography may suggest postoperatively stable biceps anchors, so this new method could minimize the overdiagnosis of recurrent SLAP lesions. Additional gap widening on external rotation and active supination CT arthrography could be related to a true recurrent SLAP lesion and the symptoms of the patients.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Case series, Level IV.

Arthroscopic repair of type II SLAP lesions: Clinical and anatomic follow-up

Aims:

The aim was to evaluate the clinical and anatomic outcome of arthroscopic repair of type II SLAP lesions.

Materials and Methods:

The senior author performed isolated repairs of 25 type II SLAP lesions in 25 patients with a mean age of 40.0 ± 12 years. All tears were repaired using standard arthroscopic suture anchor repair to bone. All patients were reviewed using a standardized clinical examination by a blinded, independent observer, and using several shoulder outcome measures. Patients were evaluated by magnetic resonance imaging arthrogram at a minimum of 1-year postoperatively.

Statistical Analysis Used:

Two-tailed paired t-test were used to determine significant differences in preoperative and postoperative clinical outcomes scores. In addition, a Fisher's exact test was used.

Results:

At a mean follow-up of 54-month, the mean American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Shoulder Index (ASES) scores improved from 52.1 preoperatively to 86.1 postoperatively (P < 0.0001) and the Simple Shoulder Test (SST) scores from 7.7 to 10.6 (P < 0.0002). Twenty-two out of the 25 patients (88%) stated that they would have surgery again. Of the 21 patients who had postoperative magnetic resonance imaging arthrographys (MRAs), 9 patients (43%) demonstrated dye tracking between the labrum bone interface suggestive of a recurrent tear and 12 patients (57%) had a completely intact repair. There was no significant difference in ASES, SST, and patient satisfaction scores in patients with recurrent or intact repairs.

Conclusions:

Arthroscopic repair of type II SLAP lesions demonstrated improvements in clinical outcomes. However, MRA imaging demonstrated 43% of patients with recurrent tears. MRA results do not necessarily correlate with clinical outcome.

SLAP Repairs With Combined Procedures Have Lower Failure Rate Than Isolated Repairs in a Military Population: Surgical Outcomes With Minimum 2-Year Follow-up

BACKGROUND

Injuries to the superior glenoid labrum represent a significant cause of shoulder pain among active patients. The physical requirements of military service may contribute to an increased risk of injury. Limited data are available regarding the success of superior labral anterior posterior (SLAP) repairs in an active military population.

PURPOSE

To quantify the rate of clinical failure and surgical revision after isolated and combined SLAP repair.

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

All consecutive active-duty servicemembers undergoing arthroscopic repair of type II SLAP lesions at a single institution between 2006 and 2012 were identified. Patients with less than 2-year clinical follow-up and nonmilitary status were excluded. Demographic variables, surgical variables, and occupational outcomes were extracted from electronic medical records and confirmed with the US Army Physical Disability Agency database. Failure was defined as subsequent revision surgery or medical discharge with persistent shoulder complaints.

RESULTS

A total of 192 patients with SLAP repair were identified with a mean follow-up of 50.0 months (SD, 17.0 months). Isolated SLAP repair occurred in 31.3% (n = 60) versus 68.8% (n = 132) with concomitant procedures. At final follow-up, 37.0% (n = 71) of patients reported some subjective activity-related shoulder pain. Postoperative return to duty occurred in 79.6% (n = 153), and only 20.3% (n = 39) were discharged with continuing shoulder disability. The combined rotator cuff repair (96%; P = .023) and anteroinferior labral repair group (88%; P = .056) had a higher rate of functional return than isolated SLAP repair (70%). Thirty-one (16.1%) patients were classified as surgical failure and required revision. Of these, the majority of patients undergoing biceps tenodesis (76%) returned to active duty, as compared with revision SLAP repair (17%). Lower demand occupation and the presence of combined shoulder injuries (P = .011 and .016, respectively) were significantly associated with a lower risk of medical discharge and revision surgery, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Favorable outcomes can be anticipated in the majority of military servicemembers after arthroscopic SLAP repair, particularly with combined shoulder injuries. Revision surgery occurred in 16% of patients after primary SLAP repair.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Isolated repair of unstable SLAP lesions and/or increased upper extremity demands are associated with higher failure rates in this population.

Surgical treatment of symptomatic superior labrum anterior-posterior tears in patients older than 40 years: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Successful arthroscopic repair of symptomatic superior labral tears in young athletes has been well documented. Superior labral repair in patients older than 40 years is controversial, with concerns for residual postoperative pain, stiffness, and higher rates of revision surgery.

PURPOSE

To analyze the published data on the surgical treatment of superior labral injuries in patients aged ≥40 years, including those with concomitant injuries to the rotator cuff.

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review.

METHODS

A systematic review of the literature was performed using the Preferred Reporting Items of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. The MEDLINE database via PubMed and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews were searched for articles related to superior labrum anterior-posterior (SLAP) tears. Studies were included if they met the following criteria: the study contained at least 1 group of patients who had undergone arthroscopic repair of a type II or IV SLAP lesion with a minimum 2-year follow-up, objective and/or functional scoring systems were used to evaluate postoperative outcomes, and the mean patient age was ≥40 years for at least 1 treatment arm or subgroup analysis. Studies were excluded if the article was a review or if the article included data for SLAP type I, III, or V to X tears or Bankart lesions.

RESULTS

While several authors reported equivalent outcomes of SLAP repair in patients both older than 40 years and younger than 40 years, others demonstrated significantly higher failure rates in the older cohort. Decreased patient satisfaction and increasing complications, including postoperative stiffness and reoperations, occur at higher rates as the patient age increases. The literature demonstrates that biceps tenotomy and tenodesis are reliable alternatives to SLAP repair and that biceps tenotomy is a viable revision procedure for failed SLAP repair. With concomitant rotator cuff tears, the evidence favors debridement or biceps tenotomy over SLAP repair.

CONCLUSION

While studies show that good outcomes can be obtained with SLAP repair in an older cohort of patients, age older than 40 years and workers' compensation status are independent risk factors for increased surgical complications. The cumulative evidence supports labral debridement or biceps tenotomy over labral repair when an associated rotator cuff injury is present.

Superior Labrum Anterior Posterior Lesions and Associated Injuries: Return to Play in Elite Athletes

Background:

Superior labrum anterior posterior (SLAP) lesions often cause shoulder pain, dysfunction, and instability. Professional athletes require a high level of shoulder function for competition and overhead activities.

Purpose:

To evaluate elite athletes who had arthroscopic surgery for common shoulder pathologies and SLAP lesions with a follow-up of more than 3 years. The associated intra-articular pathologies and return to play were documented.

Study Design:

Case series; Level of evidence, 4.

Methods:

Thirty-five shoulders in 34 elite athletes (4 women and 30 men; mean age, 25 years [range, 18-32 years]) had arthroscopic repair of SLAP lesions and accompanying Bankart or rotator cuff tears between January 2008 and November 2011. The documentation included patient symptoms, physical examination, radiological analysis with radiographs, and magnetic resonance imaging. Shoulder function was evaluated preoperatively and at follow-up using American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) and Kerlan Jobe Orthopaedic Clinic (KJOC) scores. The mean follow-up was 52 months.

Results:

Isolated SLAP lesions were seen in 17.1% of patients, SLAP lesions and partial cuff tear occurred in 25.7%, associated Bankart lesions in 37.1%, full-thickness rotator cuff tears in 8.6%, Bankart and posterior labrum lesions in 8.6%, and Bankart and full-thickness rotator cuff tears in 2.9%. Return to play was a mean 6.4 ± 1.5 months. The mean postoperative ASES and KJOC scores were 89.6 ± 4.6 and 80.9 ± 6.8, respectively, compared with preoperative scores of 64.0 ± 7.2 and 50.5 ± 10.3 (t test, P < .01).

Conclusion:

The majority (88.2%) of professional athletes returned to their preinjury levels. SLAP lesions may frequently occur with Bankart lesions and rotator cuff tears. A high rate of return to sport at the same level of athletic performance can be achieved by anatomic repair and effective rehabilitation.

Rotator cuff repair: published evidence on factors associated with repair integrity and clinical outcome

BACKGROUND

Rotator cuff tears are common, and rotator cuff repair represents a major health care expense. While patients often benefit from rotator cuff repair, anatomic failure of the repair is not unusual.

PURPOSE

To identify the published evidence on the factors associated with retears and with suboptimal clinical outcomes of rotator cuff repairs.

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis of articles with evidence levels 1-4.

METHODS

A total of 2383 articles on rotator cuff repairs published between 1980 and 2012 were identified. Only 108 of these articles, reporting on over 8011 shoulders, met the inclusion criteria of reporting quantitative data on both imaging and clinical outcomes after rotator cuff repair. Factors related to the patients, their shoulders, the procedures, and the results were systematically categorized and submitted for meta-analysis.

RESULTS

While the number of relevant articles published per year increased dramatically over the period of the study, the clinical and anatomic results did not show improvement over this period. The weighted mean retear rate was 26.6% at a mean of 23.7 months after surgery. Retears were associated with more fatty infiltration, larger tear size, advanced age, and double-row repairs. Clinical improvement averaged 72% of the maximum possible improvement. Patient-reported outcomes were generally improved whether or not the repair restored the integrity of the rotator cuff. The inconsistent and incomplete data in the published articles limited the meta-analysis of factors affecting the outcome of rotator cuff repair.

CONCLUSION

In spite of a dramatic increase in the number of publications per year, there is little evidence that the results of rotator cuff repair are improving. The information needed to guide the management of this commonly treated and costly condition is seriously deficient. To accumulate the evidence necessary to inform practice, future clinical studies on the outcome of rotator cuff repair must report important data relating to each patient's condition, the surgical technique, the outcome in terms of integrity, and the change in patient self-assessed comfort and function.

Etiology, Diagnosis, and Management of Failed SLAP Repair

In general, favorable outcomes have been achieved with arthroscopic repair of superior labral anterior-posterior (SLAP) tears. However, some patients remain dissatisfied or suffer further injury after SLAP repair and may seek additional treatment to alleviate their symptoms. The cause of persistent pain or recurrent symptoms after repair is likely multifactorial; therefore, careful preoperative workup is required to elucidate the cause of pain. Review of the details of previous surgical procedures is crucial because certain fixation methods are prone to failure or can cause additional injury. Failed SLAP repair can be managed with nonsurgical or surgical options. Nonsurgical modalities include physical therapy and strengthening programs, anti-inflammatory agents, and activity modification. Surgical options include revision SLAP repair and biceps tenotomy or tenodesis with or without revision SLAP repair. Outcomes after surgical management of failed SLAP repair are inferior to those of primary repair. Select patients may be better served by primary biceps tenodesis rather than SLAP repair.

Arthroscopic repair of massive contracted rotator cuff tears: aggressive release with anterior and posterior interval slides do not improve cuff healing and integrity

BACKGROUND

Few studies of large-to-massive contracted rotator cuff tears have examined the arthroscopic complete repair obtained by a posterior interval slide and whether the clinical outcomes or structural integrity achieved are better than those after partial repair without the posterior interval slide.

METHOD

The study included forty-one patients with large-to-massive contracted rotator cuff tears, not amenable to complete repair with margin convergence alone. The patients underwent either arthroscopic complete repair with a posterior interval slide and side-to-side repair of the interval slide edge (twenty-two patients; Group P) or partial repair with margin convergence (nineteen patients; Group M). The patient assignment was not randomized. The Simple Shoulder Test (SST), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA) shoulder score, and range of motion were used to compare the functional outcomes. Preoperative and six-month postoperative magnetic resonance arthrography (MRA) images were compared within or between groups.

RESULTS

At the two-year follow-up evaluation, the SST, ASES score, UCLA score, and range of motion had significantly improved (p < 0.001 for all) in both groups. However, no significant differences were detected between groups. Even though the difference in preoperative tear size on MRA images was not significant, follow-up MRA images identified a retear in twenty patients (91%) in Group P and a significant difference in tear size between groups (p = 0.007).

CONCLUSIONS

The complete repair group with an aggressive release had no better clinical or structural outcomes compared with the partial repair group with margin convergence alone for large-to-massive contracted rotator cuff tears. In addition, the complete repair group had a 91% retear rate and a greater defect on follow-up MRA images. Even though this study had a relatively short-term follow-up, a complete repair of large-to-massive contracted rotator cuff tears, with an aggressive release such as posterior interval slide, may not have an increased benefit compared with partial repair without posterior interval slide.