The use of a combined rib-latissimus dorsi flap for elbow arthrodesis and soft-tissue coverage

Is there a role for elbow arthrodesis in 21st Century - Current concepts and overview of surgical techniques

Elbow arthrodesis is uncommon and is usually performed as a salvage procedure to provide a stable elbow. There is a significant gap in the literature about the indications, contraindications, fusion angle, technical tips, and reversibility of the procedure. This review addresses these questions in a evidence based manner, based on the published literature.

Elbow Arthrodesis—A Review

Elbow arthrodesis is an uncommonly performed operation, but it has a specific and niche place in the management of difficult elbow pathology. Many indications and contraindications have been reported, but one of the more challenging aspects of this procedure remains choosing the appropriate angle of fusion. Varying results have been reported along with speculations as to why the fusion may not have been obtained, such as lack of bony structure in the site. Common complications have also been reported most notably fractures distal to the plate. One area of future research is that of the reversibility of this procedure; going from a total elbow arthroplasty to an elbow arthrodesis has been studied well but not so for converting an arthrodesis to an arthroplasty. Elbow arthrodesis remains a valuable but niche solution for complex elbow pathologies that cannot be addressed with other commoner elbow operations.

Elbow Reconstruction With Compression Plate Arthrodesis and Circumferential Muscle-Sparing Latissimus Dorsi Flap After Tumor Resection: A Case Report

BACKGROUND

The goals of limb-sparing surgery in the setting of extremity malignancies are 2-fold: oncological clearance and the rehabilitation of function and aesthetics. Treatment success should be defined by the extent of restoration of the patient's premorbid function for reintegration into society.

METHODS

We would like to report an unusual case of a patient with a chronically ankylosed elbow with joint invasion by basal cell carcinoma which resulted from malignant transformation of an overlying, long-standing wound due to inadequately treated septic arthritis from his childhood years.

RESULTS

Following R0 resection, upper limb shortening and compression plate elbow arthrodesis were performed with the aim of restoring the degree of upper limb function that the patient had been accustomed to preoperatively. The resultant circumferential defect was then closed with a contralateral, free muscle-sparing latissimus dorsi flap.

CONCLUSIONS

Functional preservation may therefore be more important than the mere restoration of anatomical defects in these especially challenging situations.

Elbow arthrodesis for post-traumatic sequelae: surgical tactics using the Ilizarov frame

BACKGROUND

Surgical arthrodesis of the elbow joint is frequently unsuccessful and rarely performed. It is the purpose of this article to evaluate tactics and different constructs to achieve elbow arthrodesis (EA) using the Ilizarov apparatus in patients with post-traumatic nonreconstructable elbow sequelae.

METHODS

A consecutive series of 4 patients were treated between 2009 and 2013 (3 men and 1 woman; mean age, 46.7 [35-75] years). Two patients had late complications in total elbow replacement and developed nonunion after condylar fractures of the distal humerus. There were 3 ulnohumeral arthrodeses and 1 radiohumeral arthrodesis. The hybrid advanced Ilizarov technique was used in all cases.

RESULTS

Complete union was obtained in 3 EAs (75%) without additional surgery at an average of 23 weeks. Fusion angles ranged from 90° to 120°. One patient required amputation above the elbow because of persistent infection and chronic pain after attempted reconstruction with distraction osteogenesis for infected total elbow replacement with humeral bone loss. The average length of follow-up after EA was 33 months (range, 18-60 months). At final follow-up, the median score of the shortened Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire was 42.4 (27.3-52.2). Three patients returned to their working activities.

CONCLUSIONS

EA is not a common orthopedic procedure. Despite its difficulties and need of specific training, the Ilizarov technique provides a reproducible and reliable way of achieving solid fusion with the desired angle. Advantages include infection control, early mobilization, accurate application, convertibility and versatility compared with a monolateral fixator, and improved union rate.

Elbow arthrodesis: a novel technique and review of the literature

The elbow is a complex joint that is the mechanical link in the upper extremity between the hand and the shoulder. Loss of elbow function can severely affect activities of daily living. Arthrodesis of the elbow results in greater functional disability than arthrodesis of the ankle, hip, or knee joints. Arthrodesis is mainly performed for severe joint destruction most commonly due to posttraumatic arthrosis, instability, or infection. The authors describe a new technique of elbow arthrodesis using a step-cut osteotomy that has not been previously reported. They believe that this can increase the surface area for healing with the outcome of a higher fusion rate. It is most important, however, to achieve good compression with lag screws across the fusion site after the desired angled has been achieved. Elbow arthrodesis is not a common orthopedic procedure, but the authors believe that their novel technique provides a reproducible and reliable way to achieve a high fusion rate and desired fusion angle.