Percutaneous balloon humeroplasty for Hill-Sachs lesions: a novel technique

Minimally invasive balloon reduction of acute Hill-Sachs lesions and impression fractures after shoulder dislocation: an experimental approach

BACKGROUND

The shoulder is the joint most often affected by dislocations. It is known that bony defects of the glenoid and/or humerus can lead to recurrent dislocations even after arthroscopic shoulder stabilization. To prevent recurrent instability, it appears reasonable to reduce fresh and larger Hill-Sachs lesions (off-track lesions). In spine surgery, balloon kyphoplasty is widely used for fracture reduction. The aim of this study was to determine whether the balloon dilatation procedure is transferable to the humeral head and under which conditions it can be successful.

METHODS

In this biomechanical proof-of-concept study, a preformed "impression stamp" was used to create standardized Hill-Sachs impressions (Calandra grade III lesion) on 13 human humeral specimens. A kyphoplasty balloon was then placed intraosseously and close to the defect using a special monolateral trocar and the defect was reduced by balloon dilatation. Computed tomography imaging was performed on the native specimens, after defect placement and after reduction. Both the defect size and the extent of reduction were measured radiologically, as well as the bone density. Also, the pressure and volume necessary for reduction were measured.

RESULTS

Thirteen proximal humerus specimens were examined. The mean age of the 7 body donors (3 female) was 85 years (standard deviation [SD] ±8.1). The average bone density was 49.0 mg/ml (SD ±26.9) and therefore defined as osteoporotic. The average defect depth (difference to native, measured from a best-fit circle) was 4.1 mm (SD ±1.4), corresponding to an average defect volume of 1203 mm³ (SD ±949). After balloon dilatation, the average achieved reduction (difference to the defect) was 4.3 mm (SD ±1.9) or 1223 mm³ (SD ±1059). This results in an average difference from native to reduced of -0.2 mm (SD ±0.5) or 20 mm³ (SD ±212) and represents no significant difference compared to baseline values (P = .90 or P = .75, respective), but a slight over-reduction in the volumetric measurements. In all humeral specimens, a reduction of at least 2.6 mm or 221 mm³ compared to the defect situation was achieved. An average volume of 3.4 ml (SD ±1.1) and pressure of 271 psi (SD ±81) were required for reduction.

CONCLUSION

The present results demonstrate that minimally invasive balloon reposition of large acute Hill-Sachs lesions appears methodologically feasible. The required pressure for reduction seems to be higher compared to previous studies. Further studies are necessary for the development of this technique and its reproducible translation into clinical practice.

Arthroscopic Humeroplasty in the Treatment of Acute Reverse Hill-Sachs Lesion Associated With Posterior Shoulder Instability

Reverse Hill-Sachs lesions (RHSL) are common complications associated with posterior shoulder dislocations and represent a significant challenge for preserving joint stability and function. If untreated, these compression fractures of the anteromedial humeral head can compromise the integrity of the joint, predisposing patients to recurrent instability and arthropathy. While various treatment modalities exist, achieving an anatomic reduction of the defect while preserving the articular cartilage remains a desirable outcome, particularly in acute settings. This case report describes the successful application of a minimally invasive arthroscopy and fluoroscopy-assisted ballon humeroplasty technique to treat an acute RHSL in a 26-year-old male with bilateral posterior shoulder dislocations following trauma. While one shoulder was managed conservatively, the other exhibited recurrent instability due to an engaging RHSL, which led to surgical intervention. The procedure employed a ballon system to disimpact the humeral defect and subsequent filling with a calcium phosphate bone substitute. The procedure achieved near-anatomic reconstruction of the humeral head without compromising the integrity of the surrounding articular cartilage. At two years of follow-ups, the patient reported no instability or pain, regained full functional capacity, and achieved excellent outcomes, as demonstrated by high shoulder performance scores. This report highlights a minimally invasive technique that appears promising as a safe, effective, and reliable anatomic treatment for acute RHSL while preserving cartilage.

Arthroscopic Subdeltoid Humeroplasty in the Beach-Chair Position for Reverse Hill-Sachs Lesions

Reverse Hill-Sachs lesions (HSLs) often involve a greater percentage of the humeral head articular surface than posterior HSLs and frequently require surgical treatment in the setting of posterior shoulder instability. Multiple techniques have been described to treat these lesions depending on their size, acuity, and location. The (modified) McLaughlin procedure is widely used to treat smaller engaging lesions, whereas larger lesions involving a greater percentage of the humeral head articular surface require anatomic disimpaction, termed "humeroplasty." Humeroplasty is traditionally performed via an open approach. This technical note describes an arthroscopic subdeltoid humeroplasty technique for the reduction and fixation of reverse HSLs in the beach-chair position.

Risk factors for intra-articular involvement in proximal humeral fractures

INTRODUCTION

Identification of intra-articular involvement in proximal humeral fractures is important for operative decision making. The aim of this study was to identify the risk factors associated with intra-articular involvement in proximal humeral fractures.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

One hundred consecutive three-dimensional computed tomography reconstructions of proximal humeral fractures were identified. The fracture lines were then accurately transcribed onto a two-dimensional superior view of the humeral head and each fracture was assessed for intra-articular involvement. Statistical analyses were undertaken to identify risk factors for intra-articular involvement and extent of involvement. Furthermore, for each risk factor, common fracture patterns were identified and compared to anatomical landmarks.

RESULTS

Overall, 58% of the fractures involved the articular surface. High-energy mechanism, female gender, age ≥ 65, and posterior dislocation were risk factors for intra-articular involvement. Low-energy mechanism, female gender, age ≥ 65, varus angulation, and posterior dislocation were risk factors for increased extension of the fracture onto the articular surface.

CONCLUSION

Intra-articular involvement in proximal humeral fractures is influenced by demographics and fracture characteristics (mechanism of injury, angulation, and dislocation). Patients with identified risk factors should be appropriately evaluated for intra-articular fractures during preoperative planning to assist in operative decision making.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Basic science; anatomy study.

Arthroscopic All-Inside Suture Bridge for Remplissage Procedure Treating Off-Tracking Hill-Sachs Lesions in Anterior Shoulder Instability

Hill-Sachs lesions are significantly correlated with recurrent anterior shoulder instability. The remplissage procedure is designed to fill a posterosuperior humeral head defect with the infraspinatus tendon and posterosuperior capsule in patients with off-track Hill-Sachs lesions. This Technical Note describes an arthroscopic all-inside suture bridge to gain more footprint contact area and tissue compression to improve healing. Moreover, it does not have the necessity of going through the subacromial space to retrieve and tie the sutures. Thus, the procedure reduces the operative time and improves reproducibility.

Anterior Instability: What to Look for

Most first-time anterior glenohumeral dislocations occur as the result of trauma. Many patients suffer recurrent episodes of anterior shoulder instability (ASI). The anatomy and biomechanics of ASI is addressed, as is the pathophysiology of capsulolabral injury. The roles of imaging modalities are described, including computed tomography (CT) and MR imaging with the additional value of arthrography and specialized imaging positions. Advances in 3D CT and MR imaging particularly with respect to the quantification of humeral and glenoid bone loss is discussed. The concepts of engaging and nonengaging lesions as well as on-track and off-track lesions are examined.

[Research progress of surgical treatment for anterior shoulder dislocation and combined injuries]

Objective

To summarize the research progress of surgical treatment for anterior shoulder dislocation and combined injuries.

Methods

The related literature was reviewed, and the surgical treatment options for the anterior shoulder dislocation and its combined injuries were summarized.

Results

Anterior shoulder dislocation can combine with anteroinferior capsular ligament complex injury (Bankart injury), bony Bankart defect, and Hill-Sachs lesion. For Bankart and bony Bankart injuries, arthroscopic repair or coracoid osteotomy combined with bony graft reconstruction can be performed. For Hill-Sachs lesion, conservative treatment, soft tissue repair, or bony reconstruction should be selected based on the extent of the bone defect. For bipolar injury, the Bankart repair, Remplissage, or arthroplasty should be selected based on the extent of the glenoid defect.

Conclusion

With the development of arthroscopy and the improvement of the surgical concept, there is a complete set of surgical options for various injuries of the anterior shoulder dislocation. When choosing a surgical procedure, the patient's specific injury and age, exercise level, and other relating factors should be comprehensively assessed in order to achieve the best results.

Managing Bony Defects of the Shoulder Joint that Occur in Association with Dislocation

Background

Defects to the articular surface of the humeral head have been known to be associated with shoulder dislocation since the 19^th century. It wasn't until 1934 that the first description of the ubiquitous compression fracture of the posterolateral humeral head that occurs with traumatic anterior instability appeared. From 1940, this defect became referred to as a Hill-Sachs lesion after the investigators who reported the condition. The significance of, and therefore treatment of, these and other such bony defects around the shoulder joint has been hotly debated.

Methods

We reviewed the available current literature to determine and report on the most up to date concepts and treatment techniques being used to manage bony defects of the shoulder.

Results

Numerous surgical options have been proposed to manage bony defects of the shoulder, including a variety of defect-filling procedures, with good outcomes. However, the small numbers and diversity of case mix makes for difficult comparisons.

Conclusion

We are currently developing a greater appreciation of how both the humeral and glenoid defects interact and therefore should be assessed and addressed simultaneously in order to improve patient outcomes. More research and collaboration is needed to determine the optimal method of assessing and managing these patients.

Understanding the Hill-Sachs Lesion in Its Role in Patients with Recurrent Anterior Shoulder Instability

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The purpose of this study is to provide an update to the orthopedic field in regard to treatment of the Hill-Sachs lesion and anterior shoulder instability. The review highlights the most current knowledge of epidemiology, clinical evaluation, and surgical methods used to treat Hill-Sachs lesions. It also details the relevant clinical and surgical findings that have been made throughout the literature in the past couple of years.

RECENT FINDINGS

The most recent literature covering the Hill-Sachs lesion has focused on the relatively new and unexplored topic of the importance of concomitant injuries while treating a humeral head defect. The glenoid track concept has been clinically validated as a method to predict engagement. 3D-CT has become the "gold standard" for Hill-Sachs imaging; however, it has been noted that 3D-MRI produces results that are not significantly different from CT. Also, it has been found that when the arm is in a position of abduction during the primary injury, there is a higher risk of engagement and subsequent dislocation. Recent studies have demonstrated successful results stemming from purely arthroscopic procedures in treating Hill-Sachs lesions. Anterior shoulder instability, specifically the Hill-Sachs lesion, is an area of orthopedic study that is highly active and constantly producing new studies in an attempt of gaining the best outcomes for patients. The past few years have yielded many excellent discoveries, but there is still much more work to be done in order to fully understand the role of the Hill-Sachs lesion in anterior shoulder instability.

Management of Humeral Defects in Anterior Shoulder Instability

BACKGROUND

A Hill Sachs lesion is a posterior-superior bony defect of the humeral head caused by a compression of the hard glenoid rim against the soft cancellous bone in the context of an anterior instability episode. The presence of these humeral defects increases with the number of dislocations and larger lesions are associated with a greater chance of development of recurrent instability and recurrence after surgery. Also its location and pattern, in particular the so-called engaging Hill-Sachs, are associated with poor prognosis.

METHODS

There is a lack of consensus in terms of classification and management algorithm, although lesions greater than 25% of the humeral head had been suggested to need more than a simple Bankart repair to avoid recurrence. The concept of glenoid track has turned the attention to location and shape and not only size of the humeral defect. Moreover, the glenoid bone loss is crucial when choosing a treatment option as it contributes to decrease the glenoid track as well. A thorough revision of treatment options has been performed.

RESULTS

Numerous treatment options have been proposed including remplissage, glenoid or humeral head augmentation, bone desimpaction, humeral rotational osteotomy and arthroplasty.

CONCLUSION

Humeral defects treatment should be individualized. Determination of size and location of the defect and its relation with glenoid track is mandatory to achieve satisfactory results.

Biomechanical comparison of acute Hill-Sachs reduction with remplissage to treat complex anterior instability

BACKGROUND

Acute Hill-Sachs reduction represents a potential alternative method to remplissage for the treatment of an engaging Hill-Sachs lesion. This study biomechanically compared the stabilizing effects of an acute Hill-Sachs reduction technique and remplissage.

METHODS

Six cadaveric shoulders were tested. For the acute Hill-Sachs lesion, a unique model was used to create a 30% defect, compressing the subchondral bone while preserving the articular surface. Five scenarios were tested: intact specimen, bipolar lesion, Bankart repair, remplissage with Bankart repair, and Hill-Sachs reduction technique with Bankart repair. The Hill-Sachs lesion was reduced through a lateral cortical window with a bone tamp, and the subchondral void was filled with bone cement.

RESULTS

At 90° of abduction and external rotation (ER), total translation was 11.6 ± 0.9 mm for the bipolar lesion. This was significantly reduced after remplissage (5.9 ± 1.1 mm; P < .001) and after Hill-Sachs reduction (4.7 ± 0.4 mm; P < .001). Compared with an isolated Bankart repair, the average ER loss after remplissage was 4° ± 4° (P = .65), and the average ER loss after Hill-Sachs reduction was 1° ± 3° (P = .99). Similar joint stability was conferred after both procedures, with minimal change in range of motion.

CONCLUSIONS

Remplissage may still be the best way to address chronic Hill-Sachs lesions; however, the reduction technique is a more anatomic alternative and may be a potential option for treating an acutely engaging Hill-Sachs lesion.

Anatomic Humeral Head Reconstruction With Fresh Osteochondral Talus Allograft for Recurrent Glenohumeral Instability With Reverse Hill-Sachs Lesion

The treatment of recurrent glenohumeral instability, especially with a concomitant bony lesion, remains challenging. This is especially true in the case of posterior instability given its less common incidence. Moreover, the presence of an engaging reverse Hill-Sachs lesion in combination with posterior instability will result in the need for a more aggressive treatment option. In comparison with a Hill-Sachs lesion, a reverse Hill-Sachs lesion features greater chondral deficiency that must be addressed during treatment. We propose the talus allograft as a potential allograft for treatment of an engaging reverse Hill-Sachs lesion. The superior articular surface of the talus may be used to reconstruct the articular surface of the humeral head. In this technical note, we describe our preferred primary technique for treatment of an engaging reverse Hill-Sachs lesion with recurrent glenohumeral instability through use of a fresh osteochondral talus allograft, as well as discuss the advantages and disadvantages of this allograft option.

Arthroscopic Reduction and Balloon Humeroplasty in the Treatment of Acute Hill-Sachs Lesions

Shoulder instability is often associated with an impaction fracture of the humeral head, commonly referred to as a "Hill-Sachs lesion." This lesion is present in both anterior and posterior instability. Forty percent to 90% of anterior shoulder dislocations have associated Hill-Sachs lesions, whereas 29% to 86% of posterior shoulder dislocations have reverse Hill-Sachs lesions. Both of these lesions can contribute to recurrent instability of the shoulder and require surgery to be treated. Currently, the most common procedures to address Hill-Sachs lesions are the remplissage procedure (transfer of the infraspinatus into the posterior humeral head defect), capsular shift, disimpaction technique, humeral head resurfacing, bone block transfer, or shoulder arthroplasty. Reverse Hill-Sachs lesions are managed with similar procedures, such as the remplissage-equivalent technique described by McLaughlin, which involves transfer of the subscapularis tendon to fill the humeral head defect. The procedure has the advantage of "exteriorizing" the humeral head defect, but in the case of large lesions, it can result in significant loss of the articulating articular surface. The purpose of this article is to describe an arthroscopically assisted disimpaction technique with supplemental grafting using a balloon osteoplasty technique for a reverse Hill-Sachs lesion with bone cement to support and maintain the reduction.

Balloon humeroplasty reconstruction for acute Hill-Sachs injury: A technical note

Posterior Hill-Sachs humeral defects are present in 80% to 100% of cases of anterior shoulder dislocation and are a factor in recurrent instability. Several techniques have been described to fill the defect and avoid recurrence. We developed a percutaneous technique to fill the newly created defect in which a percutaneous balloon, analogous to the one used in vertebral kyphoplasty, is used to reduce the defect, which is then filled with calcium phosphate cement. One patient with an acute anterior dislocation of the shoulder with no previous history was treated using this method. Early imaging results showed adequate reduction of the defect and no cement resorption. The patient was followed for 12 months; he had normal function of the shoulder and no recurrent dislocation. Shoulder computed tomography (CT) arthrography with contrast after 3 months showed an intact capsule and no recurrence of the defect. While this technique is certainly in its infancy, we have demonstrated that emergency reduction of the defect in acute first occurrence anterior shoulder dislocation is feasible, helps to restore normal anatomy of the humeral head and leads to good clinical results. Whether it can improve clinical results and prevent recurrent shoulder dislocation remains to be evaluated.

Effect of bone loss in anterior shoulder instability

Anterior shoulder instability with bone loss can be a difficult problem to treat. It usually involves a component of either glenoid deficiency or a Hill-Sachs lesion. Recent data shows that soft tissue procedures alone are typically not adequate to provide stability to the shoulder. As such, numerous surgical procedures have been described to directly address these bony deficits. For glenoid defects, coracoid transfer and iliac crest bone block procedures are popular and effective. For humeral head defects, both remplissage and osteochondral allografts have decreased the rates of recurrent instability. Our review provides an overview of current literature addressing these treatment options and others for addressing bone loss complicating anterior glenohumeral instability.

Management of bone loss in glenohumeral instability

This review discusses the evaluation and management of bone loss in glenohumeral instability. The glenohumeral joint may experience a dislocation or subluxation associated with traumatic injury or through repetitive atraumatic events. Nearly 62% of cases with recurrent dislocation have both Hill-Sachs and bony Bankart defects. Treatment of unstable bone defects may require soft-tissue repair, bone grafting, or both, depending on the size and nature of the defects. The most common treatment is isolated soft-tissue repair, leaving the bone defects untreated, although emerging evidence supports directly addressing these bony defects.

Management of humeral and glenoid bone loss in recurrent glenohumeral instability

Recurrent shoulder instability and resultant glenoid and humeral head bone loss are not infrequently encountered in the population today, specifically in young, athletic patients. This review on the management of bone loss in recurrent glenohumeral instability discusses the relevant shoulder anatomy that provides stability to the shoulder joint, relevant history and physical examination findings pertinent to recurrent shoulder instability, and the proper radiological imaging choices in its workup. Operative treatments that can be used to treat both glenoid and humeral head bone loss are outlined. These include coracoid transfer procedures and allograft/autograft reconstruction at the glenoid, as well as humeral head disimpaction/humeroplasty, remplissage, humeral osseous allograft reconstruction, rotational osteotomy, partial humeral head arthroplasty, and hemiarthroplasty on the humeral side. Clinical outcomes studies reporting general results of these techniques are highlighted.

[Surgical treatment of posterior shoulder dislocation: importance of arthroscopy]

OBJECTIVE

Posterior dislocations of the shoulder represent a rare injury with frequently occurring soft tissue and/or bony concomitant lesions such as the reverse Hill-Sachs lesion and the dorsal labrum tear. For the combination of these injuries, no evidence-based therapeutic recommendations exist.

AIM OF STUDY

Reflecting on two clinical cases and the current literature data, options for the treatment of combined osseous and soft tissue injuries due to posterior dislocation of the shoulder are presented.

METHODS

We report two cases of fresh traumatic first-time posterior dislocations that were each explored arthroscopically and subsequently operated using an open technique. In the first case, we performed refixation of the labrum, followed by open osteosynthesis with bone substitution. Treatment of the second case included diagnostic arthroscopy and - after a frustrating attempt to elevate the defect in an arthroscopically assisted retrograde technique - open reconstruction of the humeral head with an allograft.

RESULTS

In both cases good clinical outcomes with Constant scores of 79 and 86 points at the 16- and 12-month follow-ups, respectively, were achieved. Radiologically complete integration of the used materials was found.

CONCLUSION

These cases show that for the operative treatment of fresh, traumatic posterior shoulder dislocation, it is useful to explore the joint arthroscopically to identify concomitant injuries of the labrum and if necessary treat them. The bony pathology of the humeral head can subsequently be addressed in an open technique, whereby the appropriate treatment should be chosen based on the size of the defect.