Clinical outcomes of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty in patients aged younger than 60 years

Treatment of race and ethnicity in shoulder and elbow research: An analysis of the most cited papers on rotator cuff repair

Background

This study examined the current approach to the inclusion of race and ethnicity among frequently referenced shoulder surgery literature and discussed guidance for best practices for the inclusion of race and ethnicity in shoulder research.

Methods

The shoulder literature were systematically reviewed for the most frequently cited studies discussing rotator cuff repair, total shoulder arthroplasty, and Bankart repair. All reviewed studies met the timeline criteria (2013-2022). Only studies with clinical outcomes were included. Review articles, meta-analyses, systematic reviews, basic science studies, or any manuscript that did not represent clinical outcomes research were excluded. Author, year issued, the journal in which the paper was published, study design, the number of subjects, duration of follow-up, independent variables, dependent variables, results, and conclusions were extracted from the articles that met the inclusion criteria. Whether race and/or ethnicity were included in the study design in any way was also recorded. For those studies in which race and ethnicity were included, a detailed analysis of the paper's treatment of race using the JAMA Updated Guidance on Reporting of Race and Ethnicity in Medical and Science Journals was performed and recorded.

Results

In the "rotator cuff repair" cohort of papers, there were 2 articles that mention race. Out of the 2 articles that mentioned race, neither included race appropriately using the JAMA Updated Guidance on Reporting of Race and Ethnicity in Medical and Science Journals. In the "Bankart repair" cohort of papers, each article lacked the mention of race among their patient population. The "total shoulder arthroplasty" manuscripts also did not include treatment of race and ethnicity in any way.

Discussion

Race and ethnicity and other social determinants of health can be used to understand the source of healthcare disparities. Unless a thoughtful and deliberate consideration of race and ethnicity is undertaken, their inclusion in clinical research can be a double-edged sword due to the potential race and ethnicity-centered treatment involvement can be rooted in fallacies. In shoulder surgery clinical research, race and ethnicity should be considered in concert with social factors that could exacerbate poor patient outcomes in our patient population.

Level of evidence

Level V.

Clinical and radiological outcomes between superior capsule reconstruction using allografts or xenografts: a 2-year retrospective comparison study

BACKGROUND

Treating symptomatic, massive, irreparable rotator cuff tears remains challenging and controversial. Superior capsule reconstruction (SCR) using the tensor fascia lata has shown promising clinical results; however, due to donor site morbidity, interest in SCR using other grafts has increased. Yet, no studies have compared allografts with xenografts. In addition, the clinical results of graft tears remain controversial. This study compared the clinical and radiological outcomes of SCR between those with allografts and xenografts.

METHODS

Sixty-seven patients who had undergone SCR with allografts or xenografts between January 2016 and December 2020 were included in this retrospective study. Furthermore, 62 patients were evaluated 2 years postsurgery, with five patients excluded due to loss to follow-up or conversion to reverse shoulder arthroplasty. The Constant, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons, and visual analog scale scores, range of motion, and radiological outcomes were evaluated before the surgery and at 6 and 24 months after surgery.

RESULTS

The graft tear rate was 23.08% in the allograft group and 42.86% in the xenograft group at 6 months after surgery; at 2 years postsurgery, the gap further widened to 32.43% and 64%, respectively, showing a significant difference. The graft in the allograft group was thicker than that in the xenograft group, and there were significant differences on the humeral side and in the midsubstance area. The allograft group showed significantly better visual analog scale, Constant, and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores than the xenograft group 2 years postsurgery. However, the difference in clinical outcomes between the two groups did not surpass minimal clinically important differences.

CONCLUSION

Although arthroscopic SCR using xenografts had significantly lower clinical outcome than allografts, this difference did not reach minimal clinically important differences. Arthroscopic SCR using xenografts showed higher graft tear rates than allografts. Even with partial tears, better results were obtained if the graft continuity was maintained. Additionally, after surgery, the xenograft showed less thickness than the allograft and resulted in more tears, specifically in the midsubstance area.

Restoration of Internal Rotation After Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty May Vary Depending on Etiology in Patients Younger Than 60 Years Old: A Multicenter Retrospective Study

BACKGROUND

Reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) offers promising functional outcomes for young patients, yet challenges persist in restoring internal rotation (IR). This study aimed to assess the restoration of IR after RSA in patients younger than 60 years old and analyze the factors affecting IR recovery.

METHODS

A retrospective multicenter study was conducted, examining the functional outcome of patients who underwent RSA, with a minimum follow-up period of 2 years. Two subgroups of patients who underwent primary RSA were analyzed separately with respect to active (AIR1): "difficult AIR1" and "easy AIR1."

RESULTS

The study included 136 patients (overall series) with a mean age of 51.6 years. The overall series showed statistically significant improvement in active range of motion (RoM), pain, and Constant scores, especially with active IR (p<0.01). According to etiology, statistically significant improvement (p<0.05) in active IR was observed for fracture sequelae, primary osteoarthritis, and rheumatoid arthritis, while no statistically significant improvement in internal rotation was observed for tumor, revision, and cuff tear arthropathy (p>0.05). In subgroup analysis, patients with easy AIR1 displayed a statistically significant lower body mass index and better Constant score mobility, as well as improved motion in forward elevation and active IR (p<0.05). No statistically significant associations were found between improved IR and prosthetic design or subscapularis repair. Scapular notch, lysis of the graft, and teres minor atrophy were significantly associated with better active IR (p<0.05).

CONCLUSION

RSA improves active RoM, pain, and functional outcomes in patients under 60. However, the degree of improvement in IR may vary depending on several factors and the underlying etiologies. These insights are crucial for patient selection and counseling, guiding RSA optimization efforts.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

The surgical treatment of proximal humerus fractures 2010-2019: United States national case volume and incidence trends

Background

Proximal humerus fractures are the third most common fracture type for patients between the ages of 65 and 89 and occur more frequently in women than men. Given the variety of surgical treatments for proximal humerus fractures, the aim of this study was to (1) report United States national volume and incidence estimates for surgical management of proximal humerus fractures to better understand the changing practice over the past decade and (2) to analyze differences in volume and incidence among age groups, sex, and geographic region.

Methods

Using IBM Marketscan national database, all patients that underwent open reduction internal fixation (ORIF), hemiarthroplasty, or reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) between 2010 and 2019 were identified with Current Procedural Terminology codes. The dataset was further stratified to identify patients treated for proximal humerus fractures. IBM Marketscan provided discharge weights that were used to determine estimated national annual volumes of each procedure in IBM SPSS Statistics software (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). Volume and incidence were adjusted per 1,000,000 persons and calculated for subgroups according to age group, sex, and geographical region. The United States Census Bureau annual population data was used for all incidence calculations.

Results

Over the past decade, the total volume and incidence of surgically treated proximal humerus fractures increased by 13% and 5%, respectively. Although overall incidence decreased, ORIF remained the most common surgical treatment. The greatest decrease in volume and incidence of ORIF occurred in patients ≥75. The incidence of ORIF treatment increased in the South and West while it decreased in the Northeast and Midwest. Total volume and incidence of HA decreased between 2010 and 2019 and this trend remained among all subgroups. Total volume and incidence of RTSA increased by over 300%. The incidence of males and females receiving RTSA increased by 266% and 320%, respectively. Volume and incidence of RTSA increased across all age groups. Volume and incidence of RTSA increased in the Midwest, South, and Western regions while it remained unchanged in the Northeast.

Conclusion

Surgical management trends of proximal humerus fractures have changed greatly over the past decade. ORIF remains the most common surgical treatment for proximal humerus fractures. HA has fallen out of favor while RTSA has seen significant increases in usage across sex, age groups, and geographic regions. These trends represent a change in practice for treating proximal humerus fractures by considering all patient and fracture characteristics when opting for surgical management.

Glenohumeral Superior Translation and Subacromial Contract Pressure Are Both Improved With Superior Capsular Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Biomechanical Investigations

PURPOSE

To review cadaveric studies evaluating the biomechanical outcomes of superior capsular reconstruction (SCR) with different graft types for the treatment of irreparable rotator cuff (RTC) tears.

METHODS

PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase were queried in January 2022 to conduct this meta-analysis using the following key words: "superior capsule reconstruction," "superior capsular reconstruction," and "biomechanics." Articles were included if they reported glenohumeral superior translation or subacromial contact pressure following SCR in cadaveric RTC tears. The review adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses criteria. Number of shoulders, graft types, and biomechanical outcomes were recorded and analyzed with forest plots.

RESULTS

Twelve studies (95 shoulders) were included in the statistical analysis. There was a significant reduction in glenohumeral superior translation following SCR compared with RTC tear across 10 studies (79 shoulders) with standardized mean difference (SMD) -2.48 mm; confidence interval (CI) -3.28 mm, -1.69 mm. The SMD between fascia lata graft and RTC tear was -3.84 mm (CI -4.82 mm, -2.86 mm) and between dermal allograft and RTC tear was -2.05 mm (CI -3.10 mm, -1.00 mm). There was a significant reduction in subacromial contact pressure following SCR compared with RTC tear across 5 studies (55 shoulders) with SMD -3.49 MPa (CI -4.54 MPa, -2.44 MPa). The SMD between fascia lata graft and RTC tear was -3.21 MPa (CI -5.08 MPa, -1.34 MPa) and between dermal allograft and RTC tear was -3.89 MPa (CI -5.91 MPa, -1.87 MPa).

CONCLUSIONS

Independent of graft type, biomechanical studies suggest that SCR improves glenohumeral superior translation and subacromial contact pressure in comparison with RTC tear at time zero. There was no definitive evidence identified in this study to suggest a biomechanically superior SCR graft option.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Investigating the biomechanical outcomes of several graft types for superior capsular reconstruction will help surgeons better understand the efficacies of different graft types for use in superior capsule reconstruction surgery.

Comparison of Functional Outcomes and Complications of Inlay and Onlay Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty in Neer Type 4 Proximal Humerus Fractures and Cuff Tear Arthropathy: A Multicentric Study

Background

This multicenter retrospective study was conducted with the objective of comparing the outcomes and complications between inlay and onlay reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) in patients presenting Neer Type 4 proximal humerus fractures and cuff tear arthropathy. The primary aim of this investigation was to assess and juxtapose the clinical as well as functional outcomes of individuals who underwent onlay reverse shoulder arthroplasty with those who underwent inlay reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

Methods

A retrospective cohort study was conducted, involving patients who had undergone reverse shoulder arthroplasty between the period of 2016 and 2022. The study divided the population into two groups: Group A received inlay humeral components, while Group B received onlay humeral components. Functional outcomes were evaluated using the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) and Constant scores. Range of motion, infection, periprosthetic fractures, and nerve injuries were also assessed.

Results

The study included 67 patients in Group A and 62 patients in Group B. Group A had significantly better functional outcomes, as indicated by higher ASES and Constant scores (p < 0.05). Group A also had greater shoulder joint motion (p < 0.05). Periprosthetic fractures were significantly more common in Group B (p < 0.05). However, complication rates, including infection and instability, did not significantly differ between the groups (p > 0.05). Nerve injuries occurred in both groups, with slightly higher occurrence in Group B.

Conclusion

Inlay humeral components in reverse shoulder arthroplasty for Neer Type 4 fractures and cuff tear arthropathy resulted in better functional outcomes, increased range of motion, and lower incidence of periprosthetic fractures compared to onlay components. Onlay components showed potential advantages in reducing instability rates. Further studies with larger samples and standardized protocols are needed to confirm these findings.

Trends in the treatment of proximal humerus fractures from 2010 to 2020

BACKGROUND

The incidence of proximal humerus fractures (PHF) is continuing to rise due to shifts towards a more aged population as well as advancements in surgical treatment options. The purpose of this study is to examine and compare trends in the treatment of PHFs (nonoperative vs. operative; different surgical treatments) across different age groups over the last decade (2010-2020).

METHODS

The New York Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System (SPARCS) database was queried using International Classification of Diseases and Current Procedural Terminology codes to identify all patients presenting with or undergoing surgery for PHF between 2010 and 2020. Treatment trends, demographics, and insurance information were analyzed during the study period. Comparisons were made between operative and nonoperative trends with respect to the number and type of surgeries performed among 3 age groups: ≤49 years, 50-64 years, and ≥65 years. The rate of postoperative complications and reoperations was evaluated and compared among different surgical treatments for patients with a minimum 1-year postoperative follow-up.

RESULTS

A total of 92,308 patients with a mean age of 67.8 ± 16.8 years were included. Over the last decade, there was no significant increase in the percentage of PHFs treated with surgery. A total of 15,523 PHFs (16.82%) were treated operatively, and these patients, compared with the nonoperative cohort, were younger (64.9 years vs. 68.4 years, P < .001), more likely to be White (80.2% vs. 74.7%, P < .001), and more likely to have private insurance (41.4% vs. 32.0%, P < .001). For patients ≤49 years old, trends in operative treatment have remained stable with internal fixation (IF) as the most used surgical modality. For patients 50-64 years old, we observed a gradual decline in the use of hemiarthroplasty (HA), with a corresponding increase in the use of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA), but IF continued to be the most used operative modality. In patients over 65 years, a steep decline in the use of IF and HA was noted during the first half of the decade along with a significant exponential increase in the use of rTSA, which surpassed the use of IF in 2019. Despite the increase in the use of rTSA, no differences in rate of surgical complications were noted between rTSA and IF (χ2 = 0.245, P = .621) or reoperations (χ2 = 0.112, P = .730).

CONCLUSION

Nonsurgical treatment remains the mainstay treatment of PHFs. Although there is no increase in the prevalence of operative treatment in patients ≥50 years in the last decade, there is an exponential increase in the use of rTSA with a corresponding decrease in HA and IF, a trend more substantial in patients ≥65 years compared with patients between 50 and 64 years.

When and how much does the muscle strength recover after arthroscopic superior capsular reconstruction?

BACKGROUND

Recently, arthroscopic superior capsular reconstruction (SCR) has been performed for irreparable large to massive rotator cuff tears and excellent clinical results have been reported. Although the muscle strength is reported to recover, it has not yet been clarified when and how much it recovers. The purpose of this study was to determine the recovery pattern of muscle strength after SCR.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 35 patients (mean age, 65 years) who met the following inclusion criteria: (1) patients with large to massive irreparable tears of the rotator cuff including the supraspinatus and infraspinatus tendons; (2) those with severe muscle atrophy and fatty change; (3) those who underwent assessment of muscle quality and strength by magnetic resonance imaging and dynamometry at 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years; (4) those with a minimum follow-up period of 2 years; and (5) those without severe osteoarthritis. The isometric muscle strength of scaption (ie, scapular-plane elevation), internal rotation, and external rotation in adduction was measured twice for each motion by a dynamometer.

RESULTS

Relative to the muscle strength on the uninvolved side, the involved side showed 61% ± 21% in scaption, 63% ± 20% in external rotation, and 103% ± 29% in internal rotation at 2 years after surgery. Whereas no significant differences were observed between the 1-year and 2-year follow-up assessments, a significant difference in muscle strength of scaption was found between 6 months and 1 year (P = .0174). Graft retear was seen in 5 cases (14%). There was a trend that the muscle strength of scaption and external rotation in the no-retear group was greater than that in the retear group despite no significant difference (P = .0717 and P = .0824, respectively).

CONCLUSION

The recovery of the muscle strength after SCR was observed until 1 year after surgery, and the muscle strength of scaption and external rotation returned to 60% of that on the uninvolved side at 2 years.

Improved functional, radiographic and patient-reported outcomes at midterm follow-up for shoulder arthroplasty patients 75 years and older

Background

Current discussion centers around the appropriateness of shoulder arthroplasty in elderly patients, and whether anatomic and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty yield acceptable results in this population. The purpose of this study was to examine midterm outcomes in patients 75 years and older who underwent either procedure.

Methods

A retrospective review was performed on patients who underwent anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (aTSA) or reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) between 2000 and 2018. Inclusion criteria was patient age ≥75 years at time of surgery and ≥1 years postoperative follow-up. Primary outcomes were differences in Simple Shoulder Test (SST), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain score, and range of motion. A secondary outcome was revision surgery.

Results

22 patients who underwent aTSA and 17 patients who underwent rTSA were included. Mean age at surgery was 79 and 80 in the aTSA and rTSA groups, respectively. Mean postoperative follow-up was 6.6 years across both cohorts. Anatomic TSA patients experienced improvements in VAS (7 preop vs. 1 postop; p < 0.001), ASES (16 vs. 75; p < 0.001), and SST (2 vs. 8; p < 0.001) scores. Reverse TSA patients also experienced improvements in VAS (7 vs. 1; p < 0.001), ASES (29 vs. 74; p < 0.001), and SST (1 vs. 7; p < 0.001) scores. Anatomic TSA patients experienced improved external rotation (17° vs. 53°; p < 0.001), forward elevation (108° vs. 155°; p < 0.001), and internal rotation (L5 vs. T10; p < 0.001). Reverse TSA patients experienced improved forward elevation (52° vs. 126°; p < 0.001). 21 aTSA patients (100%) and 16 rTSA patients (94%) experienced survival free from revision. 100% of aTSA and rTSA patients experienced survival free from loosening.

Conclusion

Both aTSA and rTSA can be performed in the elderly population with acceptable midterm outcomes, suggesting that implant survival and patient satisfaction have the potential to endure through the end of life.

Level of evidence

IV.

Outcomes of reverse shoulder arthroplasty in patients under 55 years old: Results from the New Zealand joint registry

Background

The appropriate age at which to perform reverse shoulder arthroplasty is controversial. The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of reverse shoulder arthroplasty between younger and older patients.

Methods

Patients who underwent primary reverse shoulder arthroplasty between January 2000 and December 2019 were identified from New Zealand Joint Registry records. Patients were stratified into two cohorts according to age at the time of surgery: < 55 years and ≥ 55 years. These two groups were then compared with regard to baseline characteristics, indications for surgery, revision rates, and patient-reported outcomes using the Oxford Shoulder Score and American Shoulder and Elbow Score (ASES).

Results

A total of 5518 primary reverse shoulder arthroplasty cases were identified, with 75 patients < 55 years at the time of surgery (range: 34-54 years). The mean duration of follow-up was 2.36 years (range: 0.11-13.37 years) in the younger cohort and 3.10 years (range: 0.01-16.22 years) in the older patient cohort. Indications for surgery differed significantly between the two groups, with younger patients having higher rates of inflammatory arthritis (p < 0.001), posttraumatic arthritis (p < 0.001), and avascular necrosis (p = 0.049). The younger cohort had an inferior 6-month postoperative Oxford Shoulder Score compared to the older cohort (mean: 28.5 [younger cohort] vs. 35.7 [older cohort]; p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in revision rate between the younger and older patient cohorts during the study period (1.56 [<55 years] vs. 0.74 [≥55 years] revisions per 100 component-years; p = 0.332).

Conclusion

Our early results suggest that younger patients undergoing reverse shoulder arthroplasty demonstrate high implant retention rates, comparable to older patients. Longer-term patient-reported outcomes in younger patients are required to guide appropriate patient selection for reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

Level of evidence

Level III, retrospective case-control study.

Return to Sports Activity After Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty

Background

There are little published data on return to sports (RTS) after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA).

Purpose

To (1) determine the rate and timing of RTS after RTSA in an Asian population, (2) analyze predictive factors for RTS, and (3) determine the relationship between RTS after RTSA and clinical/radiological outcomes.

Study Design

Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods

A retrospective review was performed on consecutive patients with diagnosis of irreparable rotator cuff tear (RCT), cuff tear arthropathy (CTA), or degenerative osteoarthritis who underwent RTSA between May 2017 and May 2020. Included were patients who played sports preoperatively in ≤3 years and had ≥2-year follow-up. Patients were divided into 2 groups based on responses to a telephone survey about RTS after RTSA: those who returned to sports (group A) and those who did not (group B). Patient characteristics, pre- and postoperative clinical features and functional scores, and radiologic outcomes (acromial fracture, scapular notching, heterotopic ossification, and loosening of humeral and glenoid component) were compared between the groups.

Results

Of 59 eligible patients, 44 patients (28 in group A, 16 in group B) were included. The RTS rate after RTSA was 63.6%, and the mean RTS time was 9.1 months (range, 3-36 months). There was a significant group difference in body mass index (BMI) (group A, 24.3 ± 2.1; group B, 27.1 ± 4.4; P = .01) and preoperative diagnosis (CTA/irreparable RCT/degenerative osteoarthritis diagnoses: group A, 13/12/3; group B, 3/6/7; P = .03). Patients in group A showed significantly higher forward flexion (P = .03) and higher Simple Shoulder Test score (P = .02) than group B at final clinical follow-up. No significant difference in radiological outcomes was found between the groups.

Conclusion

Patients with a low BMI and those diagnosed with CTA or irreparable RCT were found to have better RTS rates after undergoing RTSA, and forward flexion and Simple Shoulder Test scores at final follow-up were significantly higher in the RTS group, with no significant differences in complications.

Early clinical and patient-reported outcomes for arthroscopic and mini-open superior capsular reconstruction are similar for irreparable rotator cuff tears

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to report and compare postoperative range of motion (ROM), patient-reported outcomes, and failure rates following superior capsular reconstruction (SCR) and to compare outcomes between arthroscopic and mini-open techniques.

METHODS

All SCR procedures utilising dermal allograft with a minimum of 6 months of follow-up at multiple institutions between November 2015 and October 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Preoperative patient demographics, imaging measurements, surgical technique (arthroscopic versus mini-open), and outcomes including pain scores, conversion to reverse shoulder arthroplasty, subsequent surgery, and postoperative ROM were recorded. Outcomes for arthroscopic versus mini-open approaches were compared via t-test, Fisher's exact test, or chi square test, as appropriate, with differences of p ​< ​0.05 considered significant.

RESULTS

180 total patients were included, including 98 who underwent arthroscopic SCR and 82 who underwent mini-open SCR. Final follow-up was at a mean of 32 months (standard deviation = 11 months). SCR improved pain (visual analog scale ​= ​4.4 pre-operatively vs. 1.4 post-operatively, p ​< ​0.0001) and ROMin active forward flexion (136° pre-operatively vs. 150° post-operatively, p ​= ​0.0012). No difference in post-operative pain visual analog scores was found between mini-open and arthroscopic cohorts (1.3 vs. 1.6, p ​= ​0.3432) at a mean of 14 months post-operatively. At a mean of 32 months post-operatively, there were no differences in ASES, QuickDASH, SST, WORC, or SANE scores between open and arthroscopic cohorts. There was no difference in rates of failure between mini-open and arthroscopic cohorts (15.9% vs. 17.3%, p ​= ​0.789).

CONCLUSIONS

This study confirmed that SCR improves pain and ROM in the short term. Mini-open SCR appears to provide similar improvements in pain and ROM compared with arthroscopic SCR, as well as patient-reported outcomes at 3 years. No difference in failure rates was detected between the 2 procedures.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 3 evidence.

Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty Patients Younger Than 60 Years Old Exhibit Lower Clinically Significant Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) Scores Compared to Older Patients

INTRODUCTION

The incidence of reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) in the United States has increased. Patients under 60 years old with failed rotator cuff repairs or degenerative joint disease with glenoid deformity may be candidates for RTSA and contribute to this increase. The single assessment numeric evaluation (SANE) score is a reliable post-operative scoring technique when compared with other post-operative measures. This study aimed to compare the effect of age on the likelihood of reaching clinically significant SANE scores following RTSA.

METHODS

A multicenter retrospective review was performed with a consecutive series of RTSA from December 2015 to September 2021. Patients were stratified into groups based on their age at the time of operation: (1) less than 60 years old, (2) 60-69 years old, (3) 70-79 years old, and (3) greater than 80 years old. The proportions of patients in all cohorts reaching and surpassing clinically significant thresholds at each visit were determined. Likelihood ratios were determined for each age cohort to compare the likelihood of reaching clinically significant SANE scores.

RESULTS

A total of 292 of 885 (33%) patients had completed survey data over two years and were included in the study. The 70-79-year-old group was 3.152 (p=.035) times more likely to achieve minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and 2.125 (p=.048) times more likely to achieve patient-acceptable symptomatic state (PASS) compared with patients <60 years old. The cohort who was 80+ years old was also 4.867 (p=.045) times more likely to achieve MCID compared to the <60-year-old cohort. The <60 cohort had the lowest proportion of all patient cohorts achieving MCID.

CONCLUSION

A lower proportion of patients younger than 60 years old undergoing RTSA achieved clinically significant post-operative SANE scores. The 70-79-year-old age group was more likely to reach MCID and PASS, and the patients who were 80+ years old were more likely to reach MCID compared to patients younger than 60 years old.

Incidence of primary anatomic and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty in patients less than 50 years of age and high early revision risk

BACKGROUND

Compared with the overall incidence of shoulder arthroplasty (SA), the relative risk and burden of revision may vary among patients specifically 40-50 years of age and less than 40 years of age. Our aim was to investigate the incidence of primary anatomic total SA and reverse SA, rate of revision within 1 year, and determine the associated economic burden in patients younger than 50 years.

METHODS

A total of 509 patients less than 50 years old who underwent SA were included, using a national private insurance database. Costs were based on the grossed covered payment. Multivariate analyses were performed to identify risk factors associated with revisions within 1 year of the index procedure.

RESULTS

SA incidence in patients less than 50 years old increased from 2.21 to 2.5 per 100,000 patients from 2017 to 2018. The overall revision rate was 3.9% with a mean time to revision of 96.3 days. Diabetes was a significant risk factor for revision (P = .043). Surgeries performed in patients less than 40 years old cost more than those performed in patients aged 40-50 years for both primary ($41,943 ± $23,842 vs. $39,477 ± $20,874) and revision cases ($40,370 ± $21,385 vs. $31,669 ± $10,430).

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates that the incidence of SA in patients less than 50 years old is higher than previously reported in the literature and most commonly reported for primary osteoarthritis. Given the high incidence of SA and subsequent high early revision rate in this subset population, our data portend a large associated socioeconomic burden. Policymakers and surgeons should use these data for implementing training programs focused on joint sparing techniques.

Efficacy and Long-Term Outcomes of Intra-Articular Autologous Micro-Fragmented Adipose Tissue in Individuals with Glenohumeral Osteoarthritis: A 36-Month Follow-Up Study

BACKGROUND

Glenohumeral osteoarthritis (GOA) is associated with disabling shoulder pain that affects everyday life. Its management comprises various treatment approaches, both conservative and surgical. Regenerative medicine has gained a major role in the conservative treatment of osteoarthritis. Intra-articular injection of adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells (ADMSCs) is a widely used regenerative medicine approach. The aim of this retrospective study was to report the safety and clinical outcomes of intra-articular injection of ADMSCs in patients with GOA over 36-months.

METHODS

This retrospective observational study involved patients with chronic shoulder pain resistant to standard conservative treatment and a diagnosis of concentric GOA, who received an intra-articular injection of autologous micro-fragmented adipose tissue (μFAT). The values of the Constant-Murley score (CMS), the visual analog scale (VAS), and the simple shoulder test (SST), collected at baseline and at 12, 24, and 36 months, were analyzed to assess treatment efficacy. The single assessment numeric evaluation (SANE) was used to rate patient satisfaction. The Friedman test was used to compare observations of CMS, VAS, and SST values repeated on the same subjects. The significance threshold was set at 0.05.

RESULTS

The participants were 65 patients with a mean age of 54.19 years and a nearly equal gender distribution. Most had mild concentric GOA classified as Samilson-Prieto grade 1. The mean follow-up duration was 44.25 months. The postoperative clinical scores showed significant improvement. At 36 months, the CMS was 84.60, the VAS score was 3.34, and the SST score was 10.15 (all p < 0.0001). The SANE score at 36 months indicated that 54 patients (83.08%) were completely satisfied with the treatment.

CONCLUSION

ADMSC treatment exerted favorable effects on the clinical outcomes of patients with GOA, providing pain relief and improving shoulder function. Our data support its use as a conservative treatment option for osteoarthritis.

Arthroscopic Repair of Massive Rotator Cuff Tears Leads to Functional Improvement in Most Patients at 4-Year Follow-up

Purpose

To assess functional outcomes and healing 4 years after arthroscopic repair of massive rotator cuff tears (MRCTs).

Methods

We conducted a retrospective study of patients who underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair of an MRCT-defined as a complete 2-tendon tear or a tear greater than 5 cm in any dimension-performed by 2 surgeons at different institutions between January 2015 and December 2018. At a minimum of 4 years postoperatively, patient-reported outcomes collected included the visual analog scale pain score, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, Veterans RAND 12 (VR-12) score, and Subjective Shoulder Value (SSV) score. Repair technique and concomitant procedures were also gathered. Tendon healing was evaluated via ultrasound at final follow-up.

Results

Functional outcomes were available for 101 patients at a mean of 63.6 ± 8.8 months (range, 48-82 months) postoperatively. Mean ASES scores improved from 40.1 to 78 (P < .001); VR-12 scores, from 37.1 to 47.7 (P < .001); and SSV scores, from 36.7 to 84.6 (P < .001). Forward flexion improved from 126° to 144° (P = .001), external rotation remained unchanged (from 47° to 44°, P = .268), and internal rotation improved by 2 spinal levels (from L4 to L2, P = .0001). Eighty-eight percent of patients (89 of 101) were satisfied with the procedure, and only 5% underwent reverse shoulder arthroplasty within the study period. Among the 39 patients who underwent postoperative ultrasound to assess healing, 56% showed complete tendon healing. There was no difference in healing or outcomes according to tear pattern. Additionally, tendon healing did not affect outcomes.

Conclusions

Arthroscopic repair of MRCTs leads to functional improvements and patient satisfaction in most cases at 4-year follow-up. The rates of patients achieving the minimal clinically important difference were 77.5%, 87.6%, 59.7%, and 80.6% for the ASES score, SSV score, VR-12 score, and visual analog scale pain score, respectively. Complete tendon healing is difficult to achieve but does not appear to limit functional improvements.

Level of Evidence

Level IV, therapeutic case series.

Present situation and development prospects of the diagnosis and treatment of rotator cuff tears

Rotator cuff tears are an important cause of shoulder pain and are caused by degeneration or trauma of the shoulder tendon at the anatomical neck of the humeral head. The understanding and research of rotator cuff tears have a history of hundreds of years, and their etiology, diagnosis, and treatment have a complete system, but some detailed rules of diagnosis and treatment still have room for development. This research paper briefly introduces the diagnosis and treatment of rotator cuff tears. The current situation and its valuable research direction are described.

Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty for Younger Patients: A Comparable Analysis of Patients Older and Younger Than 65 Years

INTRODUCTION

Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) has become a popular option for the surgical management of rotator cuff arthropathy and complex fractures of the proximal humerus. However, there is a paucity of studies evaluating outcomes, especially between patients of different age groups. The purpose of this study was to compare functional outcomes and survivorship between patients older than 65 years (o65) and those 65 years and younger (y65).

METHODS

A retrospective review was conducted at a single academic medical center identifying a consecutive cohort of patients undergoing rTSA between 2018 and 2020. The minimum follow-up time was 2 years. Patients were stratified into two groups for comparative analyses (y65 and o65). Patient demographics, perioperative and postoperative data, and functional outcomes were collected. A Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was conducted to determine survivorship, defined as revision surgery or implant failure.

RESULTS

Forty-eight patients were included for final analysis. Nineteen patients comprised the y65 group while 29 patients comprised the o65 group. No difference was observed in Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand scores at baseline nor at the latest follow-up between the two groups. Patients in the y65 group had significantly greater internal and external rotation (IR/ER) from 3 months to 2 years compared with patients in the o65 group (P ≤ 0.05). Finally, there were no differences in revision surgery rates between the y65 group and the o65 group (11% vs. 14%, P = 1.0). A KM survival analysis revealed no difference in implant failure, necessitating revision surgery between the two groups at the latest follow-up (P = 0.69).

DISCUSSION

Despite a notable difference in the number of baseline comorbidities, there were no notable differences in functional outcomes, survivorship, and revision surgery rates between each cohort. Although both groups had a similar function initially, by 3 months postoperatively, the y65 group had markedly greater range of motion in IR and ER. Longer term survivorship is needed; however, rTSA may offer a reliable option for shoulder reconstruction even in the y65 patient group.

Clinical outcomes after reverse shoulder arthroplasty in patients 60 years old and younger; medium-term results

Background

Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) has been well-described as a surgical solution to manage rotator cuff tear arthropathy in elderly, low demand paitents. As experience has increased along with improvements in technique and implant design, RTSA has become increasingly used to manage more varied pathologic conditions of the shoulder in younger, more active patients. This study evaluates outcomes in a consecutive series of patients aged 60 years old and younger after undergoing RTSA.

Methods

There were 94 shoulders in 89 patients enrolled. Mean age of the cohort was 54.8 (range 18-60 years). Surgical indications included rotator cuff tear arthropathy, irreparable rotator cuff tear without arthritis, glenohumeral arthritis with erosive glenoid deformity, inflammatory arthropathy, proximal humerus fracture nonunion/malunion and failed prior shoulder arthroplasty. Sixty-one shoulders (70%) had undergone at least one prior surgery. Of these, 6 shoulders (6% of total cohort) had a prior failed arthroplasty. Clinical outcomes (American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, Western Ontario Osteoarthritis of the Shoulder index; visual analog scale pain), radiographic outcomes and complications were analyzed and assessed for correlation with patient demographic factors.

Results

The mean follow-up for this cohort was 4.9 years (range 2-12 years). Subjects experienced improvements in ASES score and pain (P < .001) and active forward elevation (88° preop to 135° postop, P < .001). Prior operation correlated with worse postoperative ASES and WOOS scores. Higher demand occupation correlated with less improvement in pain scores. The overall complication rate was 12%. Seven shoulders (7%) underwent an additional procedure. There was a 2% incidence of dislocation and a 4% incidence of acromial stress fracture. There was a 36% incidence of notching.

Conclusion

With medium-term follow-up, RTSA is a reliable and predictable operation to manage various pathologic conditions in patients aged 60 years or less. Patients predictably experience significant improvements in pain and range of motion while assuming a modest complication risk. Long-term study is needed to understand potential for late complications or implant failure.

The clinical outcome of physiotherapy after reversed shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review

PURPOSE

The purpose of this systematic review was to analyze the current literature on the clinical outcomes of physiotherapy (PT) program after reversed total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) and to summarize the improvements in this population.

METHODS

A search was performed in four databases (MEDLINE, Embase, PubMed, Google Scholar) from its inception to 30 April 2020. Data were extracted to describe the study design and rehab programs. The quality of evidence was assessed as high, moderate, and low-level according to the Evaluation of Quality of an Intervention Study critical appraisal criteria.

RESULTS

There were 22 eligible studies including two randomized controlled trials, four prospective cohort studies, 10 retrospective reviews, five case-series, and one case-control study, with the sample sizes ranging from 9 to 474 patients followed for 1-10 years. All studies indicated substantial improvement in patients after PT program in terms of functional outcomes and forward flexion.

CONCLUSIONS

High-quality RCTs are required to provide more conclusive results. We identified substantial variation in the post-operative PT programs except for the progressive mobilization strategy and the common management following surgery to increase the soft tissue healing within 4-6 weeks.Implications for RehabilitationThe reverse shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) has been widely utilized for patients with rotator cuff arthropathy, primary arthritis, and proximal fractures.A successful outcome of rTSA is not only depending on the surgical management, but also depended on physiotherapy (PT) programs.Our systematic review concluded that a 12-week PT program starting with immobilization for 4-6 weeks, followed by 3-4 phases PT exercises including PROM, AAROM, AROM, and strength training was recommended as common management for patients received rTSA.Due to the huge variation in the included studies, the evidence of PT protocol in our study was not sufficient to summarize the better clinical practice suggestions regarding rTSA rehabilitation.

Patient Acceptable Symptom State, Minimal Clinically Important Difference, and Substantial Clinical Benefit After Arthroscopic Superior Capsular Reconstruction

BACKGROUND

Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS), minimal clinically important difference (MCID), and substantial clinical benefit (SCB) have rarely been assessed after arthroscopic superior capsular reconstruction (ASCR) with fascia lata autograft.

PURPOSE

(1) To investigate PASS, MCID, and SCB values for pain visual analog scale (pVAS), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, Constant score, and Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) after ASCR with fascia lata autograft, (2) to investigate factors for achieving PASS, MCID, and SCB.

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 2.

METHODS

We retrospectively collected data from patients who underwent ASCR between June 2013 and October 2020. A total of 88 patients were included, and anchor questions for deriving PASS, MCID, and SCB values were applied at a minimum 1-year follow-up postoperatively. PASS, MCID, and SCB were derived using sensitivity- and specificity-based approaches. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to determine factors for achieving PASS, MCID, and SCB.

RESULTS

Based on receiver operating characteristic curves, all 4 scores had acceptable area under the curve values (>0.7) for PASS, MCID, and SCB values. The PASS, MCID, and SCB values were 1.5, 2.5, and 4.5 for pVAS; 81.0, 19.0, and 27.5 for the ASES score; 60.5, -0.5, and 5.5 for the Constant score; and 75.0, 27.5, and 32.5 for SANE, respectively. Poor preoperative scores were related to significantly higher odds ratios (ORs) for achieving MCID and SCB. Wide acromiohumeral distance and dominant side were related to higher ORs for achieving PASS for the ASES score, and subscapularis tear was related to lower ORs for achieving PASS for pVAS and SCB for the Constant score.

CONCLUSION

Reliable PASS, MCID, and SCB values were achieved for at least 1 year after ASCR surgery. Poor preoperative score, wide acromiohumeral distance, and dominant side all demonstrated higher ORs for at least one value, but a subscapularis tear demonstrated lower ORs for achieving PASS for pVAS and SCB for the Constant score.

Clinical and radiographic outcomes following reverse total shoulder arthroplasty in patients 60 years of age and younger

BACKGROUND

Although initially indicated for use in older patients, reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) is being increasingly used in younger patients. The purpose of this study is to compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes of patients aged <60 years to those aged 60-79 years following primary rTSA.

METHODS

154 patients aged <60 years and 1763 patients aged 60-79 years were identified from an international multi-institutional Western Institutional Review Board-approved registry with a minimum 2 years' follow-up. All patients were evaluated and scored preoperatively and at latest follow-up using 5 outcome scoring metrics and 4 active range of motion (ROM) measurements.

RESULTS

Patients aged <60 years were more often male (P = .023), had a higher body mass index (P = .001), higher rates of previous surgery (57% vs. 27%, P < .001), higher rates of post-traumatic arthritis (11% vs. 5%, P < .001) and inflammatory arthropathy (13% vs. 4%, P < .001), and lower rates of rotator cuff tear arthropathy (25% vs. 38%, P = .006). There were no differences in ROM between the groups but patients aged <60 years had significantly lower function and outcome metric scores and higher pain scores at latest follow-up. Adverse event rates were similar between the 2 groups, but patients aged <60 years were more likely to require revision (5.2% vs. 1.8%, P = .004). Patients aged <60 years also had lower satisfaction scores (much better/better 86% vs. 92%, P = .006).

CONCLUSION

At a mean follow-up of 47 months, primary rTSA patients aged <60 years had worse clinical outcomes compared with those aged 60-79 years, with lower outcome scores, increased pain, lower function scores, and less patient satisfaction. Patients aged <60 years had higher rates of previous surgery, inflammatory arthropathy, and post-traumatic arthritis, whereas those aged 60-79 years had higher rates of rotator cuff tear arthropathy. Although complications were similar, younger patients had 3 times the risk of revision rTSA.

Preoperative Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation Score Predicts Poor Outcomes After Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty for Massive Rotator Cuff Tears Without Arthritis

Limited clinical evidence is available to help to predict poor outcomes after reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) among patients with massive rotator cuff tears without glenohumeral arthritis. A retrospective case-control study was performed for patients who underwent RSA for massive rotator cuff tear without glenohumeral arthritis (Hamada score ≤3) and had a minimum of 2 years of follow-up. Preoperative risk factors for poor outcomes were subsequently analyzed. Sixty patients (mean age, 71.4±7.4 years) met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 18 (30%) patients had poor outcomes (case group). The case group had significantly worse postoperative Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) (61.6±29.5 vs 84.9±14.1, respectively; P=.002), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (58.9±22.5 vs 82.2±14.2, respectively; P<.001), and Simple Shoulder Test (5.4±3.6 vs 8.5±2.4, respectively; P=.002) scores compared with the control group. Patients with poor outcomes had significantly higher preoperative SANE scores compared with control subjects (40.4±28.4 vs 18.8±15.7, respectively; P=.021). The results of this study suggest that patients with better overall preoperative function, as represented by higher SANE scores, have a greater likelihood of poor functional outcomes after RSA for massive rotator cuff tears without glenohumeral arthritis. For these patients, alternative treatment options should be considered. [Orthopedics. 2022;45(4):215-220.].

Midterm clinical outcome of uncemented short-stem reversed shoulder arthroplasty

INTRODUCTION

While the incidence of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) is increasing constantly, newer implants with designs other than the classic Grammont geometry are gaining importance. More anatomic inclination angles and lateralization are supposed to have a positive impact on clinical results and complication rates. Presentation of midterm results therefore is important to support these assumptions. The aim of this study was to report the midterm clinical outcome of primary rTSA with an uncemented humeral short-stem prosthesis (USSP) with a humeral inclination angle of 145° and the analysis of different variables on the outcome.

METHODS

This is a retrospective study of all patients with primary rTSA using an USSP and a combined humeral inclination angle of 145° (Ascend™ flex, Stryker) with a minimum clinical follow-up of 2 years. The implant combines a 132.5° inclination for the humeral stem with an additional 12.5° for the polyethylene inlay. Primary outcomes were patient-reported outcome measures: ASES score, simple shoulder test (SST) and subjective shoulder value (SSV). Secondary outcomes were complication and revision rates. We analyzed different variables: preoperatively gender, age, indication for surgery and status of rotator cuff. Also, the glenoid morphology was classified according to Walch and a proximal humerus cortical bone thickness measurement (CBT avg) of 6 mm was used as a threshold for osteoporosis. Postoperatively, we analyzed different radiologic parameters: filling ratio, distalization and lateralization angles according to Boutsiadis.

RESULTS

A total of 84 out of 99 (85%) patients with a mean FU of 46.7 months (range 24-80 months) could be included: 62 women and 22 men with a mean age of 74.7 years. Mean ASES score significantly increased from 47 preoperatively to 85.8 at the last follow-up (p = 0.001). The postoperative SST reached an average of 65.3 and the mean SSV was 83%. None of the variable parameters analyzed could be identified as a risk factor for a lower outcome defined as a SSV < 70. Three patients (3.6%) had a complication: one incomplete lower plexus lesion, one dislocation and one major hematoma. Surgical revision was needed in two cases (2.4%).

CONCLUSION

The midterm clinical outcome of primary reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) with an uncemented humeral short stem and a humeral inclination angle of 145° showed good-to-excellent results with a low complication and revision rate independent from a wide range of pre- and postoperative variables. PROMs are comparable to those reported for anatomic TSA with a low complication rate, different to historical studies especially with the Grammont design.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Treatment study, Level IV.

Low healing rates and moderate functional outcome after arthroscopic superior capsular reconstruction using a porcine xenograft

PURPOSE

In the absence of arthropathy, symptomatic massive irreparable rotator cuff tears contribute to a therapeutic challenge for orthopedic surgeons. The concept of superior capsular reconstruction (SCR) was introduced as an option for these challenging cases. The purposes of this study were to evaluate the clinical outcome scores when using a decellularized porcine xenograft and to evaluate the graft healing and incorporation.

METHODS

A multicentric retrospective study of consecutive SCR's performed between 2016 and 2019 by four surgeons in four centers. Preoperative and postoperative Constant score, Subjective shoulder value (SSV) and Visual analog scale for pain (VAS) were recorded. Graft healing was evaluated by ultrasound or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

RESULTS

A total of 28 shoulders were retrospectively analyzed with an average follow-up of 24 ± 9 months. One infection and four revisions (14%) to reversed shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) were reported at the final follow-up. The absolute Constant score showed a moderate, but significant improvement from 40 ± 12 to 57 ± 20 (P = 0.001). A significant improvement in pain scores was observed (P < 0.001). For patients undergoing SCR as a primary surgery, an average postoperative Constant score of 62 ± 16 was observed. This was in contrast to 43 ± 22 for patients who underwent SCR after failed rotator cuff repair. Although a strong trend in absolute differences was observed in regard to the Constant score, they did not reach statistical significance. For all other recorded outcome scores, a significant difference was reported between these groups. Graft healing was observed in (7/22) 30% of the patients. In the case of graft incorporation, an absolute constant score of 70 ± 9 was observed compared to 48 ± 21 in the graft failure group (P = 0.003). All cases with graft healing were considered to have a successful clinical outcome. This compared to only (7/15) 47% in the case of graft failure.

CONCLUSIONS

In these series, SCR with a dermal xenograft successfully alleviated pain, but provided only a moderate improvement in functional outcome. In the case of graft healing, satisfactory clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction were observed. The present study indicates the benefit of performing SCR as a primary surgery, yet warns against using SCR as a salvage option for failed rotator cuff repair. In this group, the use of dermal xenografts is limited by the low healing rates and high complication rate.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV. Retrospective case series, treatment study.

Defining Clinically Significant Outcomes Following Superior Capsular Reconstruction With Acellular Dermal Allograft

PURPOSE

To define clinically significant outcomes (CSO) thresholds for minimal clinically important difference (MCID), substantial clinical benefit (SCB), and patient-acceptable symptomatic state (PASS) in patients undergoing superior capsular reconstruction (SCR) with an acellular dermal allograft. We also evaluated patient-specific variables predictive of achieving CSO thresholds.

METHODS

The American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form (ASES), Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE), and subjective Constant-Murley (Constant) scores were collected preoperatively and at the most recent follow up for patients undergoing SCR from 2010 to 2019. A distribution-based approach was used to calculate MCID, and an anchor-based approach was used to calculate SCB and PASS. Logistic regression was used to determine factors associated with CSO achievement.

RESULTS

Fifty-eight patients were identified (n = 39 males; n = 19 females) with a mean age of 53.4 ± 14.1 years at surgery and an average follow-up of 23 months. The MCID, SCB, and PASS were 11.2, 18.02, and 68.82 for ASES, 14.5, 23.13, and 69.9 for SANE, and 3.6, 10, and 18 for Constant, respectively. Subscapularis tear, female sex, and workers compensation (WC) status reduced odds of achieving MCID. Reduced odds of achieving Constant SCB were associated with older age, female sex, and WC status, while concomitant distal clavicle excision during SCR and lower preoperative ASES increased odds of achieving ASES SCB. Reduced odds for achieving ASES PASS were associated with female sex and WC status, while reduced odds for achieving SANE PASS were associated with subscapularis tearing preoperatively.

CONCLUSION

On the basis of calculated values for MCID, SCB, and PASS, subscapularis tearing, WC status, age, and sex are associated with failure to achieve clinically significant outcomes following SCR. Concomitant distal clavicle excision during SCR and lower preoperative ASES was predictive for achievement of MCID and SCB. By defining the thresholds and variables predictive of achieving CSOs following SCR, surgeons may better counsel patients prior to SCR.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, case series.

Shoulder Arthroplasty Options for Glenohumeral Osteoarthritis in Young and Active Patients (<60 Years Old): A Systematic Review

Aim

This study aims to describe the shoulder arthroplasty options for young and active patients (<60 years old) with glenohumeral osteoarthritis.

Methods

A systematic review of the literature was conducted by searching on Pubmed database. Studies that reported outcomes of patients with glenohumeral arthritis, younger than 60 years, that underwent shoulder arthroplasty [(Hemiarthroplasty (HA), Hemiarthroplasty with biological resurfacing (HABR), Total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA), Reversed total shoulder arthroplasty (RSA)] were included. Data include patient characteristics, surgical technique, range of motion, pain relief, outcome scores, functional improvement, complications, need for and time to revision.

Results

A total of 1591 shoulders met the inclusion criteria. Shoulder arthroplasty provided improvements in terms of ROM on the 3 plains, forward flexion (FF), abduction (Abd) and external rotation (ER), in different proportions for each type of implant. Patients submitted to RSA had lower preoperative FF (p = 0.011), and the highest improvement (Δ) in Abd, but the worst in terms of ER (vsTSA, p = 0.05). HA had better ER postoperative values (vsRSA p = 0.049). Pain scores improved in all groups but no difference between them (p = 0.642). TSA and RSA groups had the best CS Δ (p = 0.012). HA group had higher complication rates (21.7%), RSA (19.4%, p = 0.034) and TSA (19.4%, p = 0.629) groups the lowest, and HABR had the highest rate of revisions (34.5%).

Conclusions

HA had the highest rate of complications and HABR unacceptable rates of revision. These implants have been replaced by modern TSAs, with RSA reserved for complex cases. Surgeons should be aware of the common pitfalls of each option.

Patient age at time of reverse shoulder arthroplasty remains stable over time: a 7.5-year trend evaluation

PURPOSE

There is a common belief among some shoulder surgeons that the increased utilization of reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) is driven by the operation being performed in younger patients. The primary purpose of this study was to evaluate the change in patient age at the time of primary RSA in the USA.

METHODS

All patients undergoing primary RSA (January 2011-June 2018) were identified in the Mariner database. The mean age at the time of primary RSA was evaluated for each patient and assessed in 6-month intervals. A longitudinal comparison over time was performed for all patients.

RESULTS

A total of 56,141 primary RSA were evaluated, with the mean age increasing from 69 in the 2011 to 71 in 2018 (p < 0.001). The largest increase in RSA utilization occurred in patients > 70 (1092 in 2011 to 3499 in 2018), with patients < 50 years demonstrating the slowest growth (13 in 2011 to 65 in 2018). However, when evaluated by percentage increase from 2011 to 2018, RSA volumes for patients < 60 have increased 390% compared to 220% for those > 70 years (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

RSA continues to be performed at a similar mean age despite expanded indications and surgeon comfort. However, patients < 60 years have had a greater increase in utilization compared to patients > 70 years. The volumetric growth of RSA has largely been driven by the older population, but younger patients have shown a higher percentage of growth, which may explain the generalized observation that RSA is performed in younger patients.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III; Retrospective comparative study; Treatment study.

Are short press-fit stems comparable to standard-length cemented stems in reverse shoulder arthroplasty? A prospective, randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND

The literature comparing humeral implants in reverse shoulder arthroplasty is sparse. With minimal supporting literature, there has been a trend away from standard-length cemented humeral implants to press-fit stems and, recently, to shorter-stem implants. It is known that early implant migration, within the first 2 years postoperatively, is predictive of later implant loosening and possible revision surgery. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to compare clinical outcomes and implant migration between cemented standard-length humeral stems and press-fit short stems using model-based radiostereometric analysis.

METHODS

After a power analysis, 41 shoulders were prospectively randomized to receive either a cemented standard-length or press-fit short humeral stem for primary reverse shoulder arthroplasty between July 2017 and June 2019. Following surgery, participants were imaged with stereo radiographs acquired at 6 weeks (baseline), 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years. Migration of the humeral stem at each time point was compared with baseline, with differences in migration between cohorts assessed using a mixed-effects model with the Bonferroni test for multiple comparisons. Patient-reported outcome measures (Subjective Shoulder Value; American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons shoulder score; Simple Shoulder Test score; Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score; and Constant score) were also compared.

RESULTS

At 6 months (P = .025), 1 year (P = .004), and 2 years (P = .001) postoperatively, press-fit short stems migrated significantly more than cemented stems along the superior-inferior translation axis; in addition, they showed greater total translation at 2 years (P = .003). Mean total translation (± standard deviation) at 2 years was 0.4 ± 0.2 mm and 1.0 ± 1.1 mm for the cemented and press-fit cohorts, respectively. Mean migration between the 1- and 2-year time points was minimal for both stem fixation groups along all axes (<0.1 mm and 0.6°). There was no difference in active range of motion, pain, or validated outcome measures between the cohorts at 2 years (P ≥ .170).

CONCLUSION

This randomized clinical trial shows that press-fit short humeral stems subside substantially more than standard-length cemented stems but ultimately achieve stability from 1 year through 2 years. Conversely, no significant differences were observed in clinical outcomes between cohorts.

Bursal Acromial Reconstruction (BAR) Using an Acellular Dermal Allograft for Massive, Irreparable Posterosuperior Rotator Cuff Tears: A Dynamic Biomechanical Investigation

PURPOSE

To investigate the effect of bursal acromial reconstruction (BAR) using an acellular dermal allograft on glenohumeral joint kinematics including maximum abduction angle, glenohumeral superior translation, cumulative deltoid force, and subacromial contact pressure.

METHODS

In this dynamic biomechanical cadaveric shoulder study, 8 fresh-frozen cadaveric shoulders (age 53.4 ± 14.2 years, mean ± standard deviation) were tested using a dynamic shoulder testing system. Maximum abduction angle (MAA), glenohumeral superior translation (ghST), maximum cumulative deltoid force (cDF), and subacromial peak contact pressure (sCP) were compared across 3 conditions: (1) intact shoulder; (2) massive retracted irreparable posterosuperior rotator cuff tear (psRCT) according to Patte III; and (3) BAR. Additionally, humeral head containment was measured using contact pressure.

RESULTS

Compared with the simulated psRCT, BAR significantly increased mean MAA and significantly decreased ghST (P < .001, respectively) and cDF (P = .017) Additionally, BAR was found to significantly decrease sCP compared with psRCT (P = .024).

CONCLUSION

In a dynamic biomechanical cadaveric shoulder simulator, resurfacing the undersurface of the acromion using the BAR technique leads to significantly improved ghST, MAA, cDF, and sCP compared with the irreparable rotator cuff tear.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

With the BAR technique, native humeral containment may be restored, which can potentially delay progressive subacromial and glenoidal abrasive wear and improve overall shoulder function. As such, the proposed BAR technique can be considered as a technically feasible and potentially cost- and timesaving procedure, as no bone anchors are needed, glenoidal or humeral side graft ruptures can be avoided, and postoperative rehabilitation can be started immediately. However, future clinical studies are needed.

Wide variability of shoulder and elbow case volume in orthopedic surgery residency

BACKGROUND

Despite the growing popularity of certain shoulder and elbow procedures (eg, shoulder arthroplasty), resident exposure to these surgeries remains unclear. This study sought to evaluate trends in graduating orthopedic resident case volumes of commonly performed shoulder and elbow procedures.

METHODS

The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) surgical case log data from 2016 to 2020 for graduating US orthopedic surgery residents was assessed. Procedures of the shoulder and humerus/elbow were categorized into predefined ACGME categories: repair/revision/reconstruction, fracture/dislocation, and arthroscopy. The average number of cases performed per resident in each of these categories was directly compared from 2016 to 2020. The 10th and 90th percentiles of case volumes within each category of procedures was compared from 2016 and 2020.

RESULTS

There was a 31% increase in the number of shoulder repair/revision/reconstruction cases between 2016 and 2020 (average: 27.5 to 36.1; P < .001), followed by a 23% increase for elbow fracture/dislocation (24.4 to 30; P < .001), 21% increase for elbow repair/revision/reconstruction (10.6 to 12.8; P < .001), and 16% increase for shoulder arthroscopy (69 to 79.7; P < .001). No significant changes were found for shoulder fracture/dislocation and elbow arthroscopy. There was a wide case volume variability for each procedure, particularly for shoulder repair/revision/reconstruction, where there was a nearly 5-fold difference in the number of cases performed between the 10th and 90th percentiles of residents in 2020 (13 vs. 62 cases, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

The case category shoulder repair/revision/reconstruction has seen the largest relative increase in the shoulder and elbow case volume of graduating orthopedic surgery residents, most likely reflecting the national rising trends of shoulder arthroplasty. However, our study shows that there is wide variability in resident exposure to these cases. Implementation of shoulder arthroplasty case minimum requirements might help reduce case variability and discrepancies in resident education.

Clinical outcomes following reverse total shoulder arthroplasty with tuberosity excision for treatment of proximal humerus fractures: a case series

Background

Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) has become an increasingly popular treatment option for complex 3- and 4-part proximal humerus fractures in elderly patients. The literature has demonstrated that tuberosity repair likely improves postoperative range of motion (ROM). However, the difference between tuberosity repair and excision may not be appreciable to patients in their day-to-day lives. This case series reports both objective and subjective clinical outcomes of patients who underwent RTSA with tuberosity excision for proximal humerus fractures.

Methods

We reviewed the records of 41 patients who underwent RTSA for complex 3- and 4- part proximal humerus fractures. All RTSA procedures were performed by a single surgeon between 2014 and 2017. All patients underwent RTSA with extended proximal stem cementation and tuberosity excision. Postoperative outcomes were measured at least 2 years postoperatively and included ROM measurements for forward flexion, internal rotation, abduction, and external rotation. Patient-reported outcome measures included Simple Shoulder Test scores, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores, and Penn Shoulder Score were also reported.

Results

In this case series, we report on 41 patients, 33 females and 8 males. Objective measurements of ROM for forward flexion, abduction, and external rotation were 125, 95, and 36 degrees, respectively. On average, patients had an internal rotation score of 2.06 and were able to get their thumb to their iliac crest. Clinical outcome scores of these patients were 9.11, 77.79, and 74.12 for the Simple Shoulder Test, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons, and Penn Shoulder Score, respectively. Strength of the deltoid was 5/5 in all 41 patients.

Conclusions

When compared with the current literature, our tuberosity excision patients demonstrated deficits in forward flexion and abduction, with preserved external rotation. Our clinical outcome score measurements were consistent with clinical outcome measurements from previous studies of patients undergoing RTSA with tuberosity repair. We believe that tuberosity excision may be a reasonable and simpler surgical option for surgeons with lower volumes of shoulder fractures and patients with multiple comorbidities and higher surgical risk, owing to the similarity of outcome scores between our cohort and previous tuberosity repair groups.

Complications and Intraoperative Fractures in Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review

Introduction

The reverse shoulder arthroplasty is nowadays a treatment option for a variety of shoulder problems. As its incidence rose, also the number of complications increased, including intraoperative fractures.

Significance

We performed a systematic review and critical analysis of the current literature following the PRISMA guidelines. Our purpose was to: 1) determine incidence, causes, and characteristics of intraoperative fractures; 2) evaluate their current treatment options, possible related complications, reoperation rates, and the patients’ outcome; and 3) determine the overall incidence of each complication related to reverse shoulder arthroplasty. The articles were selected from PubMed medical database in April 2020 using a comprehensive search strategy. Rayyan software was used to support the selection process of the records. A descriptive and critical analysis of the results was performed.

Results

The study group included a total of 13,513 reverse shoulder arthroplasty procedures. The total number of complications was 1647 (rate 12.1%). The most common complication was dislocation (340 cases, rate 2.5%). Forty-six studies reported a total of 188 intraoperative fractures among the complications (rate 1.4%). The intraoperative fracture rate was 2.9% and 13.6% in primary and revision settings, respectively. There were 136 humeral fractures, 60% of them occurred in revision RSAs, during the removal of the previous implant, and involved the shaft in the majority of cases (39%). Glenoid fractures were 51 and occurred mostly during the reaming of the glenoid. We observed 7 further related complications (rate of 4%) and 3 reoperations (rate of 1.5%). The outcome was satisfactory in the majority of cases.

Conclusions

A comprehensive review on intraoperative fractures in reverse shoulder arthroplasties is presented. Results suggest favorable outcomes for all treatment methods, with a modest further complication rate. This investigation may aid in the treatment decision-making for these complications.

Revision Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty in Patients 65 Years Old and Younger: Outcome Comparison to Older Patients

Background

Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) is a procedure growing in prevalence among younger populations. Consequently, its use in revision arthroplasty is growing in this demographic. However, studies examining the functional outcomes of revision RTSA in younger populations compared with older populations are lacking. The primary purpose of this study is to evaluate the functional outcomes of revision RTSA in patients 65 years old and younger compared with older patients who underwent revision RTSA. We hypothesized that younger patients would have similar outcomes to older patients and both groups would demonstrate improvement in outcomes.

Methods

A retrospective review was conducted on a prospectively collected research database at a single tertiary referral center of all patients who underwent RTSA between 2007 and 2018. Patients 65 years old or younger who underwent a revision RTSA and had minimum 2-year follow-up were evaluated. A control group of patients ≥70 years old who underwent revision RTSA were also evaluated. Demographics, surgical factors, active range of motion (ROM), and patient-reported outcomes (PROMs) were compared. The ROM parameters measured were forward elevation, abduction, external rotation, and level of internal rotation. The PROMs collected included American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, Simple Shoulder Test score, University of California–Los Angeles score, Constant score, normalized Constant, and Shoulder Pain and Disability Index 130. The differences in outcomes were compared against the minimal clinically important difference and substantial clinical benefit reported for primary reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

Results

A total of 81 patients undergoing revision RTSA were evaluated at a mean follow-up of 4.5 years with 42 patients in the study group and 39 patients in the control group. Both groups demonstrated similar demographics and rates of prior surgeries. Preoperative outcome scores were lower in the study group (≤65 years old) than those in the older control group with American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, Simple Shoulder Test score, and Shoulder Pain and Disability Index 130 remaining worse postoperatively. Both groups experienced statistically significant improvements in ROM from before operation to after operation, with slightly higher improvements in overhead motion in the younger cohort. Both the study group and the control group demonstrated statistically significant improvements in all PROMs with improvement above the substantial clinical benefit for the Constant and Simple Shoulder Test scores. Despite lower functional outcomes reported in the study group postoperatively, the improvement from before operation to after operation in all PROMs was similar between groups.

Conclusion

Revision RTSA is a viable option for patients ≤65 years old with a poorly functioning shoulder arthroplasty. ROM and outcome improvements are similar compared with older patients undergoing revision RTSA, but the preoperative and postoperative functional outcomes are worse in the younger patients.

Outcomes After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair Using Margin Convergence Versus Superior Capsular Reconstruction: Should Candidates for Margin Convergence Be Treated With Superior Capsular Reconstruction?

Background

Both margin convergence rotator cuff repair (MC-RCR) and superior capsular reconstruction (SCR) result in improved clinical outcomes in the treatment of massive rotator cuff tears (RCTs). The question remains whether it is better to perform MC-RCR using native, albeit occasionally deficient, tissues or to perform primary SCR.

Purpose/Hypothesis

To compare the clinical results of MC-RCR versus SCR for the treatment of massive RCTs. It was hypothesized that SCR would yield better outcomes.

Study Design

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods

Included were patients who underwent arthroscopic MC-RCR or SCR for massive RCTs performed by a single surgeon between 2014 and 2019. MC-RCR was performed if it was technically possible to close the defect; otherwise, SCR was performed. Outcomes were assessed at 6 months and then annually using American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons; Single Assessment Numerical Evaluation; shortened version of Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand; 12-Item Short Form Health Survey Physical Component Summary; and patient satisfaction scores. The minimal clinically important difference (MCID), substantial clinical benefit (SCB), and Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) were compared between groups. Revision surgeries and complications were reported.

Results

Included were 46 patients in the MC-RCR group (mean age, 59 ± 8 years) and 46 patients in the SCR group (mean age, 57 ± 7 years); 29 patients in each group were available at 2-year follow-up. Preoperative outcome scores were not significantly different between groups. Within groups, all outcome scores improved from pre- to postoperatively (P < .05), with no significant differences in postoperative scores or patient satisfaction between groups. No significant between-group differences were noted in the percentage of patients who reached the MCID, SCB, and PASS (MCID, 92.3% vs 84.6%; SCB, 80.8% vs 80.8%; and PASS, 66.7% vs 66.7%). SCR had a significantly lower survivorship rate compared with MC-RCR (84.7% vs 100%) (P = .026).

Conclusion

Both MC-RCR and SCR provided similar improvement in outcomes; however, SCR resulted in a significantly lower survivorship rate at 2 years postoperatively. If an RCT is technically repairable, we recommend that it be repaired primarily, even if MC techniques are needed to close the defect. SCR remains a good option for massive RCTs that are not technically repairable.

Clinical outcomes and temporal changes in the range of motion following superior capsular reconstruction for irreparable rotator cuff tears: comparison based on the Hamada classification, presence or absence of shoulder pseudoparalysis, and status of the subscapularis tendon

BACKGROUND

Superior capsular reconstruction (SCR) has recently gained popularity as a surgical solution for patients with massive rotator cuff tears or shoulder pseudoparalysis (PPS). Good clinical outcomes have been reported after SCR; however, the factors that influence its clinical outcomes remain unclear. Therefore, in this study, we aimed to clarify the factors influencing postoperative outcomes after SCR using tensor fascia lata graft, for which we evaluated the Hamada grade, patients with or without PPS, and the status of the subscapularis tendon (SSC).

METHODS

In total, 54 consecutive patients with irreparable rotator cuff tears or PPS who underwent SCR between June 2014 and October 2018 were included. The enrolled patients were grouped and compared as follows: (1) Hamada grade 2 (11 patients) and Hamada grade 3 (43 patients) and (2) non-PPS (22 patients), moderate PPS (16 patients), and severe PPS (16 patients). For subanalysis, the 32 PPS patients were divided into 3 groups: intact SSC (11 patients), repairable SSC (16 patients), and irreparable SSC (5 patients). To assess shoulder function, the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score was evaluated before surgery and at 24 months postoperatively; shoulder range of motion was evaluated at 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 24 months postoperatively.

RESULTS

No significant differences in postoperative ASES scores and shoulder range of motion were observed between the Hamada grade 2 and grade 3 groups or between the non-PPS, moderate PPS, and severe PPS groups. However, significant differences in postoperative shoulder elevation and ASES scores were observed between the intact SSC and irreparable SSC groups (P = .006) and between the repairable SSC and irreparable SSC groups (P = .003).

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated that the status of the SSC, rather than the Hamada grade or the presence or absence of PPS, influences the clinical outcomes after SCR. Therefore, reparability or intactness of the SSC is an important factor in considering the surgical indication for SCR.

Superior Capsular Reconstruction With Autologous Fascia Lata Using a Single Lateral-Row Technique Is an Effective Option in Massive Irreparable Rotator Cuff Tears: Minimum 2-Year Follow-Up

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate clinical and radiologic outcomes of arthroscopic superior capsular reconstruction (ASCR) with fascia lata autograft in patients with irreparable rotator cuff tears (IRCTs) performed using a single lateral-row fixation technique.

METHODS

We studied a retrospective case series of patients with large or massive IRCTs for ASCR with fascia lata autograft. Clinical outcomes were evaluated using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and the Constant score. Healing of the graft was assessed by magntic resonance imaging or ultrasound. Acromiohumeral distance was evaluated by radiographs.

RESULTS

Thirty-one patients with an average age of 61 years and an average follow-up of 35 months (24-51 months) underwent ASCR with fascia lata autograft. There was a significant improvement in VAS (7.7-0.7), Constant score (36.0-78.7), forward elevation (115°-171°), external rotation (33°-50°), strength (0.3 kg-2.3 kg), and acromiohumeral distance (6.1 mm-8.6 mm) (P < 0.001). Graft failure was present in 13.8% of patients, as shown by magnetic resonance imaging (26 patients) or ultrasound (3 patients). Patients with failed ASCR showed worse Constant scores (68.5.8 vs 80.2, P = 0.007), worse VAS (2.5 vs 0.4, P = 0.00002), worse external rotation (20° vs 54°, P = 0.004), lower acromiohumeral distance (5mm vs 9mm, P = 0.007), and a high association with the presence of os acromiale (χ²P = 0.003). No revision or subsequent surgical procedures were required.

CONCLUSIONS

ASCR, with autologous fascia lata and single lateral row configuration, is an effective option in irreparable rotator cuff tears and results in clinical and radiologic improvement.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, retrospective case series.

Consensus statement on the treatment of massive irreparable rotator cuff tears: a Delphi approach by the Neer Circle of the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons

BACKGROUND

Management of massive irreparable rotator cuff tears (MIRCTs) remains controversial owing to variability in patient features and outcomes contributing to a lack of unanimity in treatment recommendations. The purpose of this study was to implement the Delphi process using experts from the Neer Circle of the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons to determine areas of consensus regarding treatment options for a variety of MIRCTs.

METHODS

A panel of 120 shoulder surgeons were sent a survey regarding MIRCT treatments including arthroscopic débridement and partial cuff repair, graft augmentation, reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA), superior capsular reconstruction (SCR), and tendon transfer. An iterative Delphi process was then conducted with a first-round questionnaire consisting of 13 patient factors with the option for open-ended responses to identify important features influencing the treatment of MIRCTs. The second-round survey sought to determine the importance of patient factors related to the 6 included treatment options. A third-round survey asked participants to classify treatment options for 60 MIRCT patient scenarios as either preferred treatment, acceptable treatment, not acceptable/contraindicated, or unsure/no opinion. Patient scenarios were declared to achieve consensus for the preferred and not acceptable/contraindicated categories when at least 80% of the survey respondents agreed on a response, and a 90% threshold was required for the acceptable treatment category, defined by an acceptable treatment or preferred treatment response.

RESULTS

Seventy-two members agreed to participate and were deemed to have the requisite expertise to contribute based on their survey responses regarding clinical practice and patient volume. There were 20 clinical scenarios that reached 90% consensus as an acceptable treatment, with RSA selected for 18 scenarios and arthroscopic débridement and/or partial repair selected for 2. RSA was selected as the singular preferred treatment option in 8 scenarios. Not acceptable/contraindicated treatment options reached consensus in 8 scenarios, of which, 4 related to SCR, 3 related to RSA, and 1 related to partial repair with graft augmentation.

CONCLUSION

This Delphi process exhibited significant consensus regarding RSA as a preferred treatment strategy in older patients with pseudoparesis, an irreparable subscapularis, and dynamic instability. In addition, the process identified certain unacceptable treatments for MIRCTs such as SCR in older patients with pseudoparesis and an irreparable subscapularis or RSA in young patients with an intact or reparable subscapularis without pseudoparesis or dynamic instability. The publication of these scenarios and areas of consensus may serve as a useful guide for practitioners in the management of MIRCTs.

Evaluating the role of graft integrity on outcomes: clinical and imaging results following superior capsular reconstruction

BACKGROUND

Superior capsular reconstruction (SCR) addresses massive, irreparable rotator cuff tears in young patients. The purpose of this study was to retrospectively evaluate clinical outcomes and graft integrity in patients following SCR.

METHODS

Thirty-four consecutive patients undergoing SCR by 2 surgeons with minimum 2-year follow-up were identified. Functional outcomes were obtained, including Simple Shoulder Test (SST), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form (ASES), visual analog scale (VAS), and Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) scores. Graft integrity was evaluated on magnetic resonance images (MRIs).

RESULTS

Thirty-five shoulders in 34 patients were identified. Four patients underwent subsequent surgery. The mean preoperative scores were SST 21.6 ± 17.6, ASES 28.3 ± 10.1, SANE 50.6 ± 22.1, and VAS 6.6 ± 1.7. The mean postoperative outcomes were SST 79.1 ± 19.6, ASES 79.9 ± 17.4, SANE 74.3 ± 18.7, and VAS 1.5 ± 2.2. There was statistically significant improvement in SST, ASES, and VAS following SCR. MRI revealed graft failure in 62% (n = 13 of 21) of shoulders. Radiographic evidence of graft healing did not have any effect on SST, ASES, SANE, or VAS scores.

CONCLUSION

Given the high rate of graft failure without a significant difference in clinical outcomes, graft healing after SCR might not be an independent predictor of success. The improved clinical improvement in patients undergoing SCR may be due to other known beneficial aspects of the procedure, including partial rotator cuff repair, débridement, and biceps management.

Arthroscopic Superior Capsular Reconstruction for Older Patients With Irreparable Rotator Cuff Tears: A Comparative Study With Younger Patients

BACKGROUND

Arthroscopic superior capsular reconstruction (ASCR) is a method for treating irreparable chronic rotator cuff tears. However, the extent to which ASCR can be performed with regard to the patient's age has yet to be determined.

PURPOSE

To compare the surgical outcomes of ASCR for the treatment of irreparable rotator cuff tears (IRCTs) in patients aged <65 years versus patients aged ≥65 years.

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

Of 105 patients with IRCTs who underwent ASCR between March 2013 and June 2020, 73 patients were enrolled in this study based on the selection criteria. Polypropylene mesh augmentation to the graft was used in 18 of 36 patients in the younger adults group (age, <65 years) and 20 of 37 patients in the older adults group (age, ≥65 years). The clinical and radiological outcomes were evaluated preoperatively and at the final clinical follow-up. The graft integrity status was evaluated using serial magnetic resonance imaging and set as the primary endpoint. Furthermore, subgroup analysis was performed based on age group and graft type.

RESULTS

The mean age of the patients was 59.2 ± 3.8 years in the younger adults group and 70.5 ± 4.1 years in the older adults group. Both groups showed improvement based on the clinical and radiological outcomes at the final follow-up. The mean American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores improved from 52.3 ± 15.4 to 77.3 ± 13.5 in the younger adults group (P < .001) and from 45.7 ± 16.1 to 76.6 ± 11.4 in the older adults group (P < .001). The mean visual analog scale for pain scores improved from 5.5 ± 1.2 to 2.1 ± 0.9 in the younger adults group (P < .001) and from 5.5 ± 1.4 to 2.1 ± 1.2 in the older adults group (P < .001). The graft healing rate was significantly higher in the younger adults group (81%) than in the older adults group (65%) (P = .049). Subgroup analysis showed that after mesh augmentation, the healing rate in the younger adults group (84%) was similar to that in the older adults group (85%) (P = .299).

CONCLUSION

ASCR resulted in a favorable surgical outcome for both younger and older adult patients with IRCT. The younger patients had lower graft failure rates and superior surgical outcomes. In older patients, ASCR using polypropylene mesh augmentation may reduce graft failure and result in surgical outcomes similar to those in younger patients.

Superior Capsule Reconstruction With a 3 mm-Thick Dermal Allograft Partially Restores Glenohumeral Stability in Massive Posterosuperior Rotator Cuff Deficiency: A Dynamic Robotic Shoulder Model

BACKGROUND

Superior capsule reconstruction (SCR) has been shown to improve shoulder function and reduce pain in patients with isolated irreparable supraspinatus tendon tears. However, the effects of SCR on biomechanics in a shoulder with an extensive posterosuperior rotator cuff tear pattern remain unknown.

PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS

The purpose was to (1) establish a dynamic robotic shoulder model, (2) assess the influence of rotator cuff tear patterns, and (3) assess the effects of SCR on superior humeral head translation after a posterosuperior rotator cuff tear. It was hypothesized that a posterosuperior rotator cuff tear would increase superior humeral head translation when compared with the intact and supraspinatus tendon-deficient state and that SCR would reduce superior humeral head translation in shoulders with massive rotator cuff tears involving the supraspinatus and infraspinatus tendons.

STUDY DESIGN

Controlled laboratory study.

METHODS

Twelve fresh-frozen cadaveric shoulders were tested using a robotic arm. Kinematic testing was performed in 4 conditions: (1) intact, (2) simulated irreparable supraspinatus tendon tear, (3) simulated irreparable supra- and infraspinatus tendon tear, and (4) SCR using a 3 mm-thick dermal allograft (DA). Kinematic testing consisted of static 40-N superior force tests at 0°, 30°, 60°, and 90° of abduction and dynamic flexion, abduction, and scaption motions. In each test, the superior translation of the humeral head was reported.

RESULTS

In static testing, SCR significantly reduced humeral superior translation compared with rotator cuff tear at all abduction angles. SCR restored the superior stability back to native at 60° and 90° of abduction, but the humeral head remained significantly and superiorly translated at neutral position and at 30° of abduction. The results of dynamic testing showed a significantly increased superior translation in the injured state at lower elevation angles, which diminished at higher elevation, becoming nonsignificant at elevation >75°. SCR reduced the magnitude of superior translation across all elevation angles, but translation remained significantly different from the intact state up to 60° of elevation.

CONCLUSION

Massive posterosuperior rotator cuff tears increased superior glenohumeral translation when compared with the intact and supraspinatus tendon-insufficient rotator cuff states. SCR using a 3-mm DA partially restored the superior stability of the glenohumeral joint even in the presence of a simulated massive posterosuperior rotator cuff tear in a static and dynamic robotic shoulder model.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

The biomechanical performance concerning glenohumeral stability after SCR in shoulders with large posterosuperior rotator cuff tears is unclear and may affect clinical outcomes in daily practice.

The best options in superior capsular reconstruction

Irreparable massive rotator cuff tears cause pain, loss of function, and a decrease in range of motion, which cause serious disturbances in daily life. Young patients, in particular, are active and have relatively high functional requirements, and their surgical options are limited. Superior capsular reconstruction (SCR) was first proposed for irreparable massive rotator cuff tears, good clinical results have been reported in short-term follow up. Since then, SCR has been used increasingly worldwide for irreparable massive rotator cuff tears, and various studies have been published on clinical outcomes, biomechanical outcomes, surgical techniques, and graft types. This article reviews the optimal graft and surgical options for improving clinical outcomes in SCR.

Superior capsular reconstruction for irreparable rotator cuff tears: A literature review and specialist practice report

BACKGROUND

Recent evidence continues to confirm the effectiveness of arthroscopic superior capsular reconstruction (SCR) in relieving pain and improving function in an irreparable cuff deficient shoulder. This paper presents an up-to-date literature review on SCRand a tertiary referral unit experience in the United Kingdom.

METHODS

Data was prospectively collected on patients undergoing SCR for irreparable rotator cuff tears using a dermal allograft. Patients with already established arthritis were excluded. The first 49 consecutive cases performed by 3 surgeons over 3 years (including their learning curve) with average follow-up of 19 months (range 3-37 months) were analysed. The outcomes assessed were re-operation rates, patient satisfaction and complications. The study group was analysed to identify the factors predicting outcomes.

RESULTS

The average age of the cohort was 56 years. The re-operation rate in this group was 12.2% with each of these 6 patients subsequently undergoing a reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. Forty (82%) patients were satisfied with the outcome of the procedure with 35 (72%) of them showing complete pain relief, 5 (10%) having dull aches and clicks and the remaining 9 (18%) unsatisfied due to pain. There was no difference in satisfaction rates between different age groups (p > 0.05). The pre-operative factors associated with poor outcomes included patients with multiple previous surgeries on the same shoulder (p = 0.02) and teres minor atrophy or tear (p = 0.03). The other factors that showed a trend towards inferior outcomes (but not statistically significant) included patients with degenerative tears, symptoms of longer duration (>24 months) and subscapularis tear/atrophy. No serious adverse effects such as graft rejection, infection or neuro-vascular injury were observed.

CONCLUSION

Early results of superior capsular reconstruction are promising and may offer an answer to a challenging group of patients with symptomatic irreparable rotator cuff tears. It is likely that the relatively low re-operation rates can be further improved by considering the negative prognostic factors in defining indications for surgery.

Conversion to hemi-shoulder arthroplasty or reverse total shoulder arthroplasty after failed plate osteosynthesis of proximal humerus fractures: a retrospective study

Objective

To assess the clinical outcomes of hemi-shoulder arthroplasty (HSA) versus reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) following failed plate osteosynthesis of proximal humerus fractures in elderly patients.

Methods

This retrospective study identified all patients that had a documented failed plate osteosynthesis of proximal humeral fractures treated with revision HSA or RTSA. Follow-up occurred at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after surgery and every year thereafter. The primary outcomes were the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) scores, Simple Shoulder Test (SST) scores, visual analogue scale (VAS) pain scores and the University of California, Los Angeles Shoulder Rating Scale (UCLA SRS) scores. The secondary outcome was the rate of major complications.

Results

A total of 126 patients (126 shoulders) were enrolled in the study. At the final follow-up, the RTSA group had significantly greater improvements in ASES, SST and UCLA SRS scores than the HSA group. The RTSA group had significantly larger decreases in the VAS pain score compared with the HSA group. The rate of major complications was significantly higher in the HSA group than in the RTSA group (44.4% versus 27.5%, respectively).

Conclusion

RTSA provided superior functional outcomes compared with HSA, with a lower rate of major complications after a follow-up period of at least 5 years.

Failure Rate After Superior Capsular Reconstruction With Achilles Tendon-Bone Allograft for Irreparable Rotator Cuff Tears

Background

Superior capsular reconstruction (SCR) is an alternative to reverse shoulder arthroplasty for irreparable rotator cuff tears (IRCTs). The reconstructed capsule acts as a static restraint to prevent superior migration of the humeral head. Traditional SCR uses a fascia lata autograft, which has shown failure at the greater tuberosity. An Achilles tendon-bone allograft has been proposed to improve the failure rate.

Purpose

To evaluate the surgical outcomes of SCR using an Achilles tendon-bone allograft for the treatment of IRCTs.

Study Design

Case series; Level of evidence, 4.

Methods

We retrospectively evaluated 6 patients with massive IRCTs who underwent SCR using an Achilles tendon-bone allograft between January 2017 and January 2018. Clinical outcomes were assessed using range of motion, the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, and the visual analog scale for pain. The acromiohumeral distance and the status of graft integrity were evaluated using serial magnetic resonance imaging. Second-look arthroscopy surgery was performed to evaluate graft integrity at the mean of 7.5 months postoperative.

Results

The mean ± SD clinical follow-up period was 14.5 months (range, 12-17 months). The American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons and visual analog scale scores improved from 42.8 ± 11.9 and 4.0 ± 1.2 to 62.1 ± 14.7 and 2.8 ± 1.4, respectively. Forward flexion and external rotation improved from 98° ± 36° and 58° ± 4° to 123° ± 20° and 39° ± 8°, respectively. The acromiohumeral distance improved from 3.9 ± 0.8 mm to 6.4 ± 2.2 mm at final follow-up. However, second-look arthroscopy at a mean of 7.6 months postoperatively confirmed a graft failure rate of 83.3%.

Conclusion

SCR using an Achilles tendon-bone allograft for the treatment of IRCTs had a high graft failure rate among patients in this case series.

Increasing incidence of primary reverse and anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty in the United States

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to determine the incidence of primary reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) and anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) in the United States and examine changes in age- and sex-based procedure rates. A secondary goal was to determine the incidence of hemiarthroplasty.

METHODS

Using nationally representative data along with US Census data, we identified >508,000 cases of primary RTSA, anatomic TSA, and shoulder hemiarthroplasty from 2012 to 2017. Trends in the incidence of each procedure were analyzed, and sex- and age-adjusted procedure rates were calculated.

RESULTS

From 2012 to 2017, the population-adjusted incidence of primary RTSA increased from 7.3 cases per 100,000 persons (22,835 procedures) to 19.3 cases per 100,000 (62,705 procedures); anatomic TSA increased from 9.5 cases per 100,000 (29,685 procedures) to 12.5 cases per 100,000 (40,665 procedures); and hemiarthroplasty decreased from 3.7 cases per 100,000 (11,695 procedures) to 1.5 cases per 100,000 (4930 procedures). These trends were observed among male and female patients, as well as all age groups. The greatest increase in incidence was seen in male patients as well as patients aged 50-64 years undergoing RTSA.

CONCLUSION

The incidence of primary RTSA and incidence of anatomic TSA have increased substantially in the United States from 2012 to 2017 whereas the incidence of hemiarthroplasty has decreased.