Effect of Bankart repair on the loss of range of motion and the instability of the shoulder joint for recurrent anterior shoulder dislocation

Return to sports after arthroscopic bankart repair on the dominant shoulder in overhead athletes

BACKGROUND

Arthroscopic Bankart repair (ABR) yields good results in young athletes with anterior shoulder instability. However, the treatment for overhead athletes is challenging because recovery of range of motion is necessary for return to play and repeated shoulder motion may lead to recurrent instability. The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical outcomes and return to sports after ABR on the dominant shoulder in overhead athletes.

METHODS

This study included 24 competitive level overhead athletes who underwent ABR on their dominant shoulders. The mean age at surgery was 17.6 years, and the mean follow-up was 39.7 months. The range of bilateral shoulder motion, the Rowe score, the Japanese Shoulder Society Shoulder Instability Score (JSS-SIS), and the Japanese Shoulder Society Shoulder Sports Score (JSS-SSS) were evaluated before the surgery and at the final visit. Recurrent instability, the final level of return to sports, and the duration before returning to sports were confirmed, as well as the pre-, intra- and postoperative factors, which prohibited complete return to play.

RESULTS

There were no cases of recurrent instability. The Rowe score, JSS-SIS, JSS-SSS, and the range of flexion, abduction, internal rotation significantly improved postoperatively. Fifteen athletes (62.5%) returned to the same or superior levels without any complaint in their shoulders. The mean duration needed for a complete return was 13.3 months. The postoperative external rotation deficit in abduction was larger in the athletes who returned incompletely than those who returned completely, 7.8° and 2.3°, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

ABR is a reliable surgery for preventing recurrent instability in overhead athletes, however the rate of a complete return to preinjury level was low and a long duration was needed for complete return to play. The postoperative external rotation may be necessary for a complete return to overhead sports.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV: Retrospective Case Series.

The glenohumeral micromotion and influence of the glenohumeral ligaments during axial rotation in varying abduction angle

BACKGROUND

The patients with shoulder instability or disorders in overhead athletes have been considered to have an abnormal micromotion at the glenohumeral joint. However, the normal range of the micromotion has not been available during axial rotation with various abduction angles, especially above 90° abduction. This study aimed to investigate the glenohumeral translation and influence of the glenohumeral ligaments during axial rotation with up to maximum abduction.

METHODS

Fourteen healthy volunteers performed active axial rotations at 0°, 90°, 135°, and maximal abduction angles. The positions of the humeral head center relative to the glenoid at maximally external, neutral, and maximally internal rotations (ER, NR, IR, respectively) for each abduction angle were evaluated using two- (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) shape matching registration techniques. The shortest pathway and its length between the origin and insertion of the superior, middle, and inferior glenohumeral ligaments (SGHL, MGHL, and IGHL, respectively) were calculated for each position.

RESULTS

The glenohumeral joint showed 3.1 mm of superoinferior translation during axial rotation at 0° abduction (P < 0.0001), and 2.6 mm and 4.5 mm anteroposterior translation at 135° and maximal abduction (P < 0.0001), respectively. The SGHL and MGHL reached a maximum length at ER with 0° abduction, and the anterior and posterior bands of the IGHL reached a maximum at ER with 90° abduction and IR with 0° abduction.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings indicated that the SGHL played a role as an inferior suppressor at 0° abduction, while the anterior band of IGHL played a role as an anterior stabilizer at 90° abduction. Every glenohumeral ligament did not get taut and the anteroposterior translation became greater with increasing abduction angle, above 90°. These results could be used as a reference when comparing with the pathological shoulders in the future study.

Outcomes for Arthroscopic Repair of Combined Bankart/SLAP Lesions in the Treatment of Anterior Shoulder Instability: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Background

Arthroscopic repair of combined Bankart/superior labral anteroposterior (SLAP) lesions is commonly performed to treat anterior shoulder instability, the clinical outcomes of which have not been widely studied.

Purpose

To compare the clinical outcomes for arthroscopic repair of combined Bankart/SLAP lesions in the treatment of anterior shoulder instability and to ascertain whether it is inferior to isolated Bankart repair.

Study Design

Systematic review; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods

A systematic review of the literature was performed through use of the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. Study bias was assessed using the MINORS (Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies) scoring system. Randomized controlled trials, prospective or retrospective cohort studies, and case-control studies were included, whereas systematic reviews, literature reviews, conference abstracts, case reports, case series, and non-peer-reviewed studies were excluded to guarantee the quality of the study. Data on outcomes including recurrence rate, functional scores, and range of motion (ROM) were pooled, with statistical analysis performed. A P value of <.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

The review included 7 studies with a total of 520 patients. The pooled recurrence rate after combined Bankart/SLAP repair was 6.47% (9/139). Significant improvements of postoperative versus preoperative functional scores were observed, including a reduction in the visual analog scale score for pain (mean ± SD: 0.99 ± 1.36 vs 4.13 ± 2.26; P < .00001) and an increase in mean Rowe score (89.56 ± 11.46 vs 43.16 ± 8.87; P < .00001) and mean Constant score (91.41 ± 7.57 vs 59.70 ± 5.63; P < .00001). In terms of ROM, no reduction was found in external rotation (66.56° ± 13.33° vs 67.22° ± 14.27°; P = .21), and a significant increase in abduction was found (157.67° ± 4.11° vs 144.18° ± 8.28°; P < .00001). No statistically significant difference was found between arthroscopic repair of combined Bankart/SLAP lesions and isolated Bankart repair regarding recurrence rate, functional scores, or ROM.

Conclusion

Of the pooled data, patients who underwent arthroscopic repair of combined Bankart/SLAP lesions in treatment of anterior shoulder instability showed a low recurrence rate, favorable functional scores, and no significant restriction on ROM, all of which were not significantly worse than outcomes of isolated Bankart repair. Therefore, combined repair was proven to be a viable option for extensive labral lesions.

Single anterior portal: A better option for arthroscopic treatment of traumatic anterior shoulder instability?

Objective

The aim of this study was to compare single and double anterior portal techniques in the arthroscopic treatment of traumatic anterior shoulder instability.

Methods

A total of 91 cases who underwent arthroscopic Bankart repair for anterior shoulder instability were reviewed. The patients were divided into 2 groups as Group 1 (47 male and 2 female; mean age: 25.8 ± 6.8) for arthroscopic single anterior portal approach and Group 2 (41 male and 1 female; mean age: 25.4 ± 6.6) for the classical anterior double portal approach. The groups were compared for clinical scores, range of motion, analgesia requirement, complications, duration of surgery, cost and learning curve according to a short questionnaire completed by the relevant healthcare professionals.

Results

No statistically significant difference was found between the 2 groups in terms of pre-operative and post-operative Constant and Rowe Shoulder Scores, range of motion and complications (p > 0.05). In Group 2 patients, the requirement for post-operative analgesics was significantly higher (p < 0.001), whereas the duration of surgery was statistically significantly shorter in Group 1 (p < 0.001). In the assessment of the questionnaire, it was seen that a single portal anterior approach was preferred at a higher ratio (p = 0.035). The cost analysis revealed that the cost was 5.7% less for patients with a single portal.

Conclusion

In the arthroscopic treatment of traumatic anterior shoulder instability accompanied by a Bankart lesion, the anterior single portal technique is as successful in terms of clinical results as the conventional double portal approach. The single portal technique has advantages such as less postoperative pain, a shorter surgical learning curve and lower costs.

Level of Evidence

Level III, Therapeutic study.

What Is the Critical Value of Glenoid Bone Loss at Which Soft Tissue Bankart Repair Does Not Restore Glenohumeral Translation, Restricts Range of Motion, and Leads to Abnormal Humeral Head Position?

BACKGROUND

A general consensus has been formed that glenoid bone loss greater than 20% to 25% is the critical amount at which bony augmentation procedures are needed; however, recent clinical results suggest that the critical levels must be reconsidered to lower values.

PURPOSE

This study aimed to find the critical value of anterior glenoid bone loss when a soft tissue repair is not adequate to restore anterior-inferior glenohumeral translation, rotational range of motion, or humeral head position using a biomechanical anterior shoulder instability model.

STUDY DESIGN

Controlled laboratory study.

METHODS

Eight cadaveric shoulders were tested with a customized shoulder testing system. Range of motion, translation, and humeral head position were measured at 60° of glenohumeral abduction in the scapular plane under a total of 40-N rotator cuff muscle loading in the following 11 conditions: intact; soft tissue Bankart lesion and repair; Bankart lesion with 10%, 15%, 20%, and 25% glenoid bone defects based on the largest anteroposterior width of the glenoid; and soft tissue Bankart repair for each respective glenoid defect. Serial osteotomies for each percentage of bone loss were made parallel to the long axis of the glenoid.

RESULTS

There was significantly decreased external rotation (121.2° ± 2.8° to 113.5° ± 3.3°; P = .004), increased anteroinferior translation with an externally applied load (3.0 ± 1.2 mm to 7.5 ± 1.1 mm at 20 N; P = .008), and increased posterior (0.2 ± 0.6 mm to 2.7 ± 0.8 mm; P = .049) and inferior shift (2.9 ± 0.7 mm to 6.6 ± 1.1 mm; P = .018) of the humeral head apex in the position of maximum external rotation after soft tissue Bankart repair of a 15% glenoid defect compared with the repair of a Bankart lesion without a glenoid defect, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Glenoid defects of 15% or more of the largest anteroposterior glenoid width should be considered the critical bone loss amount at which soft tissue repair cannot restore glenohumeral translation, restricts rotational range of motion, and leads to abnormal humeral head position.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

The critical level of anterior glenoid bone loss at which bony restorations should be considered is closer to 15% of the largest anteroposterior width of glenoid for defects perpendicular to the superoinferior glenoid axis, which is lower than the commonly accepted threshold of 20% to 25%.

The Influence of Surgical Stabilization on Glenohumeral Abduction Using 3-Dimensional Computed Tomography in Patients With Shoulder Instability

PURPOSE

This study compared the amount of glenohumeral abduction during arm abduction in the affected and unaffected shoulders of 3 groups of patients with shoulder instability: failed surgical stabilization, successful surgical stabilization, and unstable shoulder with no prior surgical intervention.

METHODS

All patients underwent bilateral shoulder computed tomography scans in 3 positions: 0° of abduction and 0° of external rotation (0-0 position), 30° of abduction and 30° of external rotation (30-30 position), and arms maximally abducted (overhead position). Three-dimensional computed tomography reconstruction was performed for both shoulders in all 3 positions. A specialized coordinate system marked specific points and directions on the humerus and glenoid of each model. These coordinates were used to calculate the glenohumeral abduction for the normal and affected sides in the 0-0, 30-30, and overhead positions.

RESULTS

Thirty-nine patients with shoulder instability were included, of whom 14 had failed surgical repairs, 10 had successful surgical repairs, and 15 had unstable shoulders with no prior surgical intervention. In the overhead position, patients with failed surgical intervention had significantly less glenohumeral abduction in the failed shoulder (95.6° ± 12.7°) compared with the normal shoulder (101.5° ± 12.4°, P = .02). Patients with successfully stabilized shoulders had significantly less glenohumeral abduction in the successfully stabilized shoulder (93.6° ± 10.8°) compared with the normal shoulder (102.1° ± 12.5°, P = .03). Unstable shoulders with no prior surgical intervention (102.1° ± 10.3°) did not differ when compared with the normal shoulders (101.9° ± 10.9°, P = .95).

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical intervention, regardless of its success, limits the amount of abduction at the glenohumeral joint.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, retrospective comparative study.

Arthroscopic Bankart repair for recurrent shoulder instability: A retrospective study of 86 cases

The purpose of our study was to retrospectively evaluate the outcomes of arthroscopic Bankart repair in 86 patients, who met the inclusion criteria of at least one episode of shoulder dislocation, with a minimum follow-up of one year. Outcome was measured by the use of Western Ontario Shoulder Instability (WOSI) score. At the end of our study, the recurrence rate was 7%. Young age (p = 0.016) and ligamentous laxity (p = 0.003) were associated with recurrence. Arthroscopic Bankart repair is a reliable treatment method, with good clinical outcomes. Patients with younger age or with ligamentous laxity were at the greatest risk of recurrence.

Functional outcome and the structural integrity of arthroscopic Bankart repair: a prospective trial

BACKGROUND

Recurrent anterior shoulder dislocations are common in young patients with Bankart lesions. Arthroscopic repair is an established treatment; however, recurrent instability occurs in up to 35% of patients. It is unclear whether recurrence is the result of a failure of the surgical repair to heal or a repeat injury. The aim of the present pilot study was to assess radiographic healing of Bankart lesions 6 months post surgical repair and identify any correlations between radiographic findings and subsequent recurrent dislocations.

METHODS

Eighteen patients underwent arthroscopic Bankart repair for recurrent instability. Magnetic resonance (MR) arthrograms were obtained both pre-operatively and 6 months postoperatively. Standard T1 and T2 views were obtained along with an abduction and external rotation (ABER) view. Patients were followed for a minimum of 4 years for the risk of recurrence, and functional outcomes were obtained, including the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Subjective Shoulder Scale, Ontario Shoulder Instability Index, Oxford Shoulder Instability Score and 12-Item Short Form Health Survey. Scores were correlated with pre-operative and postoperative MR findings.

RESULTS

Six of 18 patients developed recurrent instability. We could not identify correlations between reconstructed labrum (labral bumper) position, failure at suture sites and ABER findings with recurrent instability or functional outcome. Paradoxically, there was a nonstatistically significant trend for patients with no clefts between the labrum and the glenoid at any points along the repair to have worse outcomes than patients with partial or complete clefts.

CONCLUSIONS

In our pilot study, MR arthrogram was used to evaluate the labrum in detail 6 months postoperatively. Despite its proven ability to detect labral lesions, we were unable to demonstrate any features on postoperative MR arthrogram that predicted either functional outcome or recurrent instability. At 6 months post operation, functional recovery and the risk of recurrence may not depend on the anatomical appearance of the labrum alone.