Analysis of subscapularis integrity and function after lesser tuberosity osteotomy versus subscapularis tenotomy in total shoulder arthroplasty using ultrasound and validated clinical outcome measures

Managing Subscapularis in Shoulder arthroplasty

Managing subscapularis forms an integral part of shoulder arthroplasty and the ideal technique for subscapularis release and repair during shoulder arthroplasty is still under debate. The three common techniques are tenotomy, peel and lesser tuberosity osteotomy (LTO). Current literature from clinical studies does not show any difference in the outcome between the 3 techniques. However biomechanical studies favour LTO. Subscapularis sparing approach can be an alternative solution allowing early rehabilitation but needs further clinical studies to assess its longterm benefits. Failure of subscapularis repair in anatomical shoulder replacement can lead to pain, loss of movements, instability and loosening of implants. Treatment options include revision repair, tendon transfer, reconstruction with allograft tendon and revision to reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA). Repairing subscapularis in RSA can improve rotations and stability, however it also has adverse biomechanical effects on deltoid. Absence of subscapularis repair is seen to affect stability only in medialised implant designs, while no such effects are seen in lateralised design implants.

Tensionable lesser tuberosity osteotomy repair for anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty

A lesser tuberosity osteotomy (LTO) is commonly performed during total shoulder arthroplasty to access the glenohumeral joint. Healing of the LTO is critical to optimizing the outcome of the procedure and is enhanced by a repair that provides stability and compression across the osteotomy site. The purpose of this article is to describe a technique that uses a tensionable suture construct to repair the LTO during anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty using a stemless humeral component. The technique involves passing a row of high-tensile sutures through bone tunnels lateral to the osteotomy site (transosseous sutures) and another row of sutures through the humeral implant (implant sutures). One limb of each bone tunnel suture is then tied to its corresponding limb of implant suture and the remaining free strands of the tied sutures are manually tensioned and tied to each other. This technique is an efficient and reproducible method for creating compression and stability across the osteotomy site that facilitates bony healing.

Biomechanics of subscapularis V-shaped tenotomy compared to standard tenotomy

BACKGROUND

Subscapularis function is critical after anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (aTSA). Recently, however, a technique has been described that features a chevron or V-shaped subscapularis tendon cut (VT). This biomechanical study compared repair of the standard tenotomy (ST), made perpendicular to the subscapularis fibers, to repair of the novel VT using cyclic displacement, creep, construct stiffness, and load to failure.

METHODS

This biomechanical study used 6 pairs of fresh frozen paired cadaveric shoulder specimens. One specimen per each pair underwent VT, the other ST. Subscapularis tenotomy was performed 1 cm from the insertion onto the lesser tuberosity. For VT, the apex of the V was 3 cm from the lesser tuberosity. After tenotomy, each humerus underwent humeral head arthroplasty. Eight figure-of-8 sutures were used to repair the tenotomy (Ethibond Excel; Ethicon, US LLC). Specimens were cyclically loaded from 2 to 100 N at 45 degrees abduction at a rate of 1 Hz for 3000 cycles. Cyclic displacement, creep, and stiffness and load to failure were measured.

RESULTS

Cyclic displacement did not differ significantly between the ST and VT from 1 to 3000 cycles. The difference in displacement between the V-shaped and standard tenotomy at 3000 cycles was 1.57 mm (3.66 ± 1.55 mm vs. 5.1 ± 2.8 mm, P = .31, respectively). At no point was the V-shape tenotomy (VT) >3 mm of average displacement, whereas the standard tenotomy (ST) averaged 3 mm of displacement after 3 cycles. Creep was significantly lower for VT in cycles 1 through 3. For all cycles, stiffness was not significantly different in the VT group compared with the ST group. Load to failure was not statistically significant in the VT compared to the standard tenotomy throughout all cycles (253.2 ± 27.7 N vs. 213.3 ± 76.04 N; P = .25, respectively). The range of load to failure varied from 100 to 301 N for standard tenotomy compared with 216 to 308 N for VT.

CONCLUSION

This study showed that VT and ST demonstrated equivalent stiffness, displacement, and load to failure. VT had the benefit of less creep throughout the first 3 cycles, although there was no difference from cycle 4 to 3000. The VT had equivalent biomechanical properties to the ST at time zero, an important first step in our understanding of the technique. The VT technique warrants further clinical study to determine if the technique has clinical benefits over ST following aTSA.

Lesser Tuberosity Osteotomy for the Management of the Subscapularis During Total Shoulder Arthroplasty

Subscapularis integrity is critical after anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty, with failure leading to potential instability, loss of function, and revision surgery. The three well-described subscapularis mobilization techniques during total shoulder arthroplasty include tenotomy, peel, and lesser tuberosity osteotomy (LTO). While several comparative studies exist, the optimal approach remains controversial. LTO has been associated with the highest healing rates, but techniques and repair constructs are highly variable. The purpose of this article was to provide an overview of LTO with attention on radiographic assessment, repair options, and clinical outcomes.

Secondary Rotator Cuff Insufficiency After Anatomic Total Shoulder Arthroplasty

» Secondary rotator cuff insufficiency is a challenging complication after anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty.» Acute tears may be amenable to open or arthroscopic repair in some instances.» Chronic attritional tears are best managed with revision to reverse shoulder arthroplasty, especially in the elderly.» Increased glenoid inclination, larger critical shoulder angle, oversized humeral components, thicker glenoid components, and rotator cuff muscle fatty infiltration have all shown to contribute to tear risk.

Techniques for Managing the Subscapularis and Addressing Failures of the Tendon in Anatomic Total Shoulder Arthroplasty

Anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (aTSA) is an accepted treatment for a variety of degenerative conditions of the glenohumeral joint. The manner in which the subscapularis tendon is handled during the approach in aTSA is not universally agreed on. Failure of the repair after aTSA has been shown to be associated with poorer outcomes in some cases. There is no consensus on how to treat failures, as all techniques described in the literature demonstrate shortcomings. The purpose of this review is to evaluate the methods of handling the tendon in aTSA and to review options for treating failure following surgery. [Orthopedics. 2023;46(5):e264-e272.].

Subscapularis management in anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty: A systematic review and network meta-analysis

Background

This systematic review and network meta-analysis compare clinical outcomes of three different subscapularis management techniques in anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty: lesser tuberosity osteotomy, subscapularis peel, and subscapularis tenotomy.

Methods

PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane's trial registry were searched in July 2021. Comparative studies and case series evaluating the outcomes of these three techniques were included. The network meta-analysis was performed only on comparative studies.

Results

Twenty-three studies were included. Both lesser tuberosity osteotomy and subscapularis peel had significantly higher Western Ontario Osteoarthritis Scores compared to subscapularis tenotomy, but no difference in American Shoulder and Elbow Society Scores. Subscapularis peel had superior external rotation compared to lesser tuberosity osteotomy. However, no difference was found in external rotation between subscapularis peel and subscapularis tenotomy or between subscapularis tenotomy and lesser tuberosity osteotomy. The overall weighted average for lesser tuberosity osteotomy bony union was 93.6%, whereas the overall weighted average for subscapularis tendon healing was 79.4% and 87% for subscapularis tenotomy and subscapularis peel, respectively.

Discussion

This network meta-analysis demonstrated that lesser tuberosity osteotomy and subscapularis peel were associated with the high union and subscapularis healing rates and may be associated with improved shoulder function and quality of life, compared to subscapularis tenotomy. Lesser tuberosity osteotomy and subscapularis peel demonstrate a trend of superior outcomes compared to subscapularis tenotomy during anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty.

The effect of subscapularis-specific rehabilitation following total shoulder arthroplasty: a prospective, double-blinded, randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Patients undergoing a total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) through a deltopectoral approach will require repair of the subscapularis tendon. There are no universal postoperative guidelines for rehabilitation of the subscapularis specifically. We hypothesize that the addition of a subscapularis-specific regimen will result in improved subscapularis strength and function.

METHODS

Adult patients undergoing anatomic TSA for the treatment of primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis were included. Patients were randomized into either the traditional rehabilitation (TR) control group or the subscapularis rehabilitation (SR) group, which consisted of the traditional therapy along with early and additional subscapularis exercises. Baseline demographics, patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), range of motion (ROM), provocative tests, and subscapularis strength using a handheld dynamometer were measured preoperatively at the initial clinic visit (ICV) as well as 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year postoperatively. The primary outcome of interest was a comparison of subscapularis strength between cohorts relative to preoperative baseline, whereas secondary outcomes were functional, ROM, and PROMs.

RESULTS

Sixty-six patients were included in the final analysis (32 TR vs. 34 SR). There were no statistically significant differences between cohorts at the ICV with regard to demographics, baseline subscapularis strength, functional testing, or PROMs. All postoperative time points demonstrated similar subscapularis strength testing between TR and SR groups (P > .05). Additionally, peak and average subscapularis strength testing at 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively were similar to baseline ICV testing in both groups. Both groups demonstrated improvements across several provocative tests, ROM, and PROM outcome metrics at every postoperative time point as compared to baseline ICV values (P < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients undergoing anatomic TSA return to baseline internal rotation strength by 3 months postoperatively and demonstrate significant improvements in function, ROM, and several patient-reported outcome measures. The addition of early and focused subscapularis strengthening exercises does not appear to significantly impact any outcomes when compared to traditional rehabilitation programs.

Current and Future Applications of Fluorescence Guidance in Orthopaedic Surgery

Fluorescence-guided surgery (FGS) is an evolving field that seeks to identify important anatomic structures or physiologic phenomena with helpful relevance to the execution of surgical procedures. Fluorescence labeling occurs generally via the administration of fluorescent reporters that may be molecularly targeted, enzyme-activated, or untargeted, vascular probes. Fluorescence guidance has substantially changed care strategies in numerous surgical fields; however, investigation and adoption in orthopaedic surgery have lagged. FGS shows the potential for improving patient care in orthopaedics via several applications including disease diagnosis, perfusion-based tissue healing capacity assessment, infection/tumor eradication, and anatomic structure identification. This review highlights current and future applications of fluorescence guidance in orthopaedics and identifies key challenges to translation and potential solutions.

Lesser Tuberosity Osteotomy Healing in Stemmed and Stemless Anatomic Shoulder Arthroplasty Is Higher with a Tensionable Construct and Affected by Body Mass Index and Tobacco Use

BACKGROUND

This study compared the healing rates of lesser tuberosity osteotomy (LTO) for anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA), repaired with either standard knot tying or a tensionable construct. Second, we evaluated LTO healing in stemmed and stemless prostheses and identified the patient characteristics associated with healing.

METHODS

An analysis of consecutive primary TSAs approached with an LTO performed by a single surgeon between 2016 and 2020 was conducted. In the first two years of the study period, the LTOs were repaired with four #2 polyblend sutures passed through drill tunnels and around a short press-fit stem, followed by manual knot tying. Subsequently, a tensionable construct with suture tapes (TCB) was universally adopted. The radiographic appearance of the LTO was evaluated at a minimum of six months postoperatively.

RESULTS

A total of 340 patients met the study criteria, including 168 with manual knot tying, 84 TCB repairs with a stemmed implant, and 88 TCB repairs with a stemless implant. There was no difference in the baseline demographics between the groups. The LTO healing rate of the manual knot tying group (85%) was lower than that of the stemmed (95%) and stemless (98%) TCB groups (p < 0.001). When directly comparing the LTO healing between the stemmed and stemless TCB groups, the differences were not significant (p = 0.44). Across all constructs, the body mass index (BMI) was higher in the displaced nonunion group (p = 0.04), with a failure rate of 9.4% for a BMI between 30 and 40, 12.5% for a BMI between 40 and 50, and 28.6% for a BMI > 50. The rate of tobacco use was higher in the displaced nonunion group (p = 0.037).

CONCLUSION

A tensionable construct improves LTO healing compared to manual knot tying, irrespective of the implant type. In addition to the surgical technique, the patient factors that influence tuberosity healing include a greater BMI and tobacco use.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, retrospective comparative study.

Subscapularis repair techniques for reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: A systematic review

IMPORTANCE

Repair of the subscapularis can be effective in the setting of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA). However, there has yet to be a consensus on an optimal repair technique.

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this systematic review is to consolidate current high-quality studies comparing outcomes after rTSA with different subscapularis repair techniques.

EVIDENCE REVIEW

A comprehensive literature review was conducted according to the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-Analyses using the PubMed, Embase, Scopus and Cochrane databases for original, English-language studies observing outcomes of rTSA after subscapularis repair published between January 1, 2000 and December 31, 2020. Subscapularis management techniques were repair to (1) tendon (tendon-tendon), (2) prosthetic stem, (3) lesser tuberosity (bone tunnels) or (4) a subscapularis-preserving approach (intact). The repair technique was recorded for included studies, and clinical and functional subjective scores were extracted from text, tables and figures. Forest plots were created to allow for qualitative comparison of the outcomes of interest between subscapularis repair techniques.

FINDINGS

Seven comprehensive studies were identified, which included 367 patients. The mean age of patient at the time of surgery was 71.1 ± 2.8 years (range = 47-87 years). Overall, 259 patients underwent tendon-tendon repair, 48 patients underwent repair to prosthetic stem, 40 patients underwent repair with bone tunnels and 20 patients' subscapularis remained intact. Significant improvement was seen in most studies for Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (range, Δ 42.6-Δ 46.0 out of 3), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (range, Δ44.2-Δ43.6 out of 3) and Visual Analogue Scale pain scores (range Δ 4.2-Δ 6 out of 5). Active forward elevation (range Δ 40.4°-Δ 57.3° out of 4) and active external rotation (range Δ 2.9°-Δ 16.0° out of 4) significantly improved, but forward elevation varied by nearly 17° (Δ16.94°), while external rotation varied by 13° (Δ13.16°) among repair techniques. Complications were reported in only one study, which used a tendon-tendon technique.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

This study summarizes the current evidence regarding subscapularis repair techniques after rTSA including functional and subjective clinical outcome scores. Several different subscapularis repair techniques during rTSA appear to lend to sufficient improvement in clinical and subjective outcomes. This information can help guide future studies in this area and highlights the need for high quality studies comparing different subscapularis repair techniques.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Subscapularis repair in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review and descriptive synthesis of cadaveric biomechanical strength outcomes

Hypothesis/Background

There is no consensus on whether to repair the subscapularis in the setting of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA). There have been an assortment of studies showing mixed results regarding shoulder stability and postoperative strength outcomes when looking at subscapularis repair in rTSA. The purpose of this systematic review was to investigate differences in biomechanical strength outcomes of cadaveric subscapularis repair vs. no repair in rTSA.Increased force will be required to move the shoulder through normal range of motion (ROM) in cadaveric rTSA shoulders with the subscapularis repaired when compared with no subscapularis repair.

Methods

A comprehensive literature review was conducted in accordance with the 2009 Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis statement. The databases used to search the keywords used for the concepts of subscapularis, reverse total shoulder arthroplasty, and muscle strength were PubMed (includes MEDLINE), Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Reviews and Trials, and Scopus. Original, English-language cadaveric studies evaluating rTSA and subscapularis management were included, with subscapularis repair surgical techniques and strength outcomes being evaluated for each article meeting inclusion criteria.

Results

The search yielded 4113 articles that were screened for inclusion criteria by 4 authors. Two articles met inclusion criteria and were subsequently included in the final full-text review. A total of 11 shoulders were represented between these 2 studies. Heterogeneity of the data across the 2 studies did not allow for meta-analysis. Hansen et al found that repair of the subscapularis with rTSA significantly increased the mean joint reaction force and the force required by the posterior deltoid, total deltoid, infraspinatus, teres minor, total posterior rotator cuff, and pectoralis major muscles. Giles et al found that rotator cuff repair and glenosphere lateralization both increased total joint load.

Conclusion

The present review of biomechanical literature shows that repair of the subscapularis in the setting of rTSA can effectively restore shoulder strength by increasing joint reactive forces and ROM force requirements of other rotator cuff muscles and of the deltoid muscle. Available biomechanical evidence is limited, and further biomechanical studies evaluating the strength of various subscapularis repair techniques are needed to evaluate the effects of these techniques on joint reactive forces and muscle forces required for ROM.

The clinical outcome of physiotherapy after reversed shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review

PURPOSE

The purpose of this systematic review was to analyze the current literature on the clinical outcomes of physiotherapy (PT) program after reversed total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) and to summarize the improvements in this population.

METHODS

A search was performed in four databases (MEDLINE, Embase, PubMed, Google Scholar) from its inception to 30 April 2020. Data were extracted to describe the study design and rehab programs. The quality of evidence was assessed as high, moderate, and low-level according to the Evaluation of Quality of an Intervention Study critical appraisal criteria.

RESULTS

There were 22 eligible studies including two randomized controlled trials, four prospective cohort studies, 10 retrospective reviews, five case-series, and one case-control study, with the sample sizes ranging from 9 to 474 patients followed for 1-10 years. All studies indicated substantial improvement in patients after PT program in terms of functional outcomes and forward flexion.

CONCLUSIONS

High-quality RCTs are required to provide more conclusive results. We identified substantial variation in the post-operative PT programs except for the progressive mobilization strategy and the common management following surgery to increase the soft tissue healing within 4-6 weeks.Implications for RehabilitationThe reverse shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) has been widely utilized for patients with rotator cuff arthropathy, primary arthritis, and proximal fractures.A successful outcome of rTSA is not only depending on the surgical management, but also depended on physiotherapy (PT) programs.Our systematic review concluded that a 12-week PT program starting with immobilization for 4-6 weeks, followed by 3-4 phases PT exercises including PROM, AAROM, AROM, and strength training was recommended as common management for patients received rTSA.Due to the huge variation in the included studies, the evidence of PT protocol in our study was not sufficient to summarize the better clinical practice suggestions regarding rTSA rehabilitation.

Compressed autograft biceps tendon augmentation of subscapularis repair following shoulder arthroplasty

Subscapularis integrity is correlated with function following shoulder arthroplasty. Failure of healing, particularly following anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty, is associated with poor outcomes and the need for revision. Graft augmentation has been used to increase healing following rotator cuff repair but has not been commonly advocated for augmenting the subscapularis following shoulder arthroplasty. The long head biceps tendon is typically tenodesed and discarded during shoulder arthroplasty. Rather than discarding the tendon, the tendon may be compressed and applied to the subscapularis as a biologic scaffold to potentially improve subscapularis healing following shoulder arthroplasty.

Zimmer Z, Gilotra MN. Reliability, validity, and responsiveness of a novel subscapularis outcome score: The Baltimore Orthopedic Subscapularis Score

Background

Available surveys that evaluate shoulder strength and pain often combine rotator cuff muscles making the test unable to differentiate subscapularis tears from other pathology including concomitant supraspinatus, infraspinatus tears. The purpose of this study was to validate a subscapularis-specific shoulder survey (Baltimore Orthopedic Subscapularis Score) as a viable clinical outcome assessment through analysis of psychometric properties.

Methods

A 5-question survey was given to a study population of 390 patients, 136 of whom had full thickness rotator cuff tears with a minimum score of 5 (better) and a maximum score of 25 (worse). Surveys were given during the initial consultation, preoperative visit, and postoperative visit. Content validity, construct validity, test-retest reliability, responsiveness to change, internal consistency, and minimal clinically important difference using distribution and anchor-based methods were determined for our subscapularis function survey.

Results

A high correlation was reported on test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.89). An acceptable internal consistency was reported for all patients surveyed (Cronbach alpha = 0.91). Floor and ceiling effects for patients with rotator cuff pathology were minimized (1% for both). Patients with an isolated subscapularis tear scored worse than supraspinatus/infraspinatus tears and exhibited similar dysfunction as patients with a supraspinatus/infraspinatus/subscapularis tear. An acceptable construct validity was reported with subscapularis-involved tears demonstrating higher scores with significance (P < .05). There was excellent responsiveness to change with a standardized response mean of 1.51 and effect size of 1.27 (large > 0.8). The minimal clinically important difference using a distribution and anchor-based method was 4.1 and 4.6, respectively. Among patients with rotator cuff tears in this population, a score of 22 or higher predicts a subscapularis tear 75% of the time, in spite of its low overall prevalence.

Conclusion

The subscapularis shoulder score demonstrated acceptable psychometric performance for outcomes assessment in patients with rotator cuff disease. This survey can be used as an effective clinical tool to assess subscapularis function.

Ultrasound assessment after a subscapularis-sparing approach to total shoulder arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Although anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (ATSA) has favorable outcomes, nearly all techniques involve subscapularis tendon release for shoulder joint access. Such takedown of the subscapularis may be associated with decreased function, instability, and pain. Subscapularis-sparing approaches have the theoretical benefits of improved function, decreased failure of the tendon reattachment site, and early range of motion and rehabilitation. The primary purpose of this study was to use ultrasound to assess the postoperative integrity of the subscapularis tendon and surrounding soft tissues after ATSA with a subscapularis-sparing technique through an extensile anterosuperior skin incision. Our hypothesis was that this subscapularis-sparing approach would have low rates of subscapularis disruption.

METHODS

A consecutive cohort of patients who underwent subscapularis-sparing ATSA between 2014 and 2017 were included. Ultrasound was used to evaluate the rotator cuff tendons and deltoid postoperatively, and these were classified as intact, disrupted, or unable to be adequately visualized. Clinical outcome scores, range of motion, and strength measurements were also collected at 1-3 years postoperatively.

RESULTS

Thirty-seven subscapularis tendons and 40 supraspinatus and infraspinatus muscles were adequately visualized and included for analysis. Of the subscapularis muscles, 32 (86%) were intact; 38 of the visualized supraspinatus muscles (95%) and 39 of the infraspinatus muscles (98%) were intact. No dehiscence or loss of integrity of the deltoid was noted. Clinical comparison between patients with disrupted subscapularis muscles and patients without such disruption demonstrated no difference in clinical outcome scores and postoperative range of motion but showed less strength in forward flexion, abduction, and external rotation.

CONCLUSIONS

The rate of subscapularis disruption using a subscapularis-sparing approach for ATSA was low (14%), but the potential for tendon disruption was not eradicated. Favorable clinical outcomes support this surgical approach as a potential technique for ATSA.

Lesser Tuberosity Osteotomy Combined with Anteroinferior Capsulectomy for Anatomic Shoulder Arthroplasty

Adequate subscapularis tendon mobilization and glenoid exposure are critical to a successful anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty. A lesser tuberosity osteotomy allows for direct bone-to-bone healing while maintaining the strong tendon-to-bone attachment of the subscapularis tendon insertion. Excision of the typically thickened and contracted anteroinferior capsule in osteoarthritic shoulders can help mobilize the subscapularis, theoretically allowing for optimal soft-tissue balance, decreased tension on the subscapularis repair, improved glenoid exposure, and anatomic repair. In this Technical Note and accompanying video, we describe our technique for lesser tuberosity osteotomy with anteroinferior capsulectomy for anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty. This technique reliably and reproducibly produces good results in terms of glenoid exposure, soft-tissue balance, and postoperative subscapularis function.

Shoulder strength outcomes after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review and descriptive synthesis

Hypothesis and Background

There is no differences in abduction, internal rotation, or external rotation strength after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) with or without subscapularis repair. Repair of the subscapularis can be effective in the setting of rTSA. However, consensus has yet to be reached on whether postoperative strength after rTSA differs based on subscapularis management. The purpose of this review is to evaluate shoulder strength outcomes after rTSA with and without subscapularis tendon repair.

Methods

A comprehensive literature review was conducted using the key terms "subscapularis" AND "reverse total shoulder arthroplasty" AND "muscle strength" in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Reviews and Trials, and Scopus. Original, English-language studies evaluating shoulder strength outcomes after rTSA published from January 1, 2000, to present were evaluated. Strength outcomes reported included abduction strength (kg) and internal rotation strength (kg) using an electric spring balance and external rotation strength (lb) using a handheld dynamometer. Heterogeneity of data in the included studies did not allow for meta-analysis.

Resuts

The search yielded 4253 unique results, which were screened for inclusion according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). Two articles met eligibility criteria and were included in the final full-text review. A total of 267 shoulders were represented, 111 with subscapularis repair and 156 without subscapularis repair. No significant differences in abduction (P = .39), internal rotation (P = .09), and external rotation (P = .463) strength were observed between subscapularis repair and nonrepair groups.

Conclusion

There were no differences in abduction, internal rotation, or external rotation strength after rTSA with or without subscapularis repair. The literature on postoperative strength outcomes after rTSA is limited, and further study in this area is warranted.

Does shoulder stability differ with or without subscapularis repair after primary reverse total shoulder arthroplasty? A systematic review

The use of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) has expanded from its original indication as a rotator cuff arthropathy treatment to include a large variety of pathologies. A frequently reported complication with this surgery is postoperative shoulder instability with reported incidence varying widely from 2.3 to 38%. The etiology for this instability is broad and includes prosthesis design, mechanical impingement, surgical technique, and axillary/deltoid function. A PROSPERO-registered systematic review was performed utilizing PRISMA guidelines using Cochrane, PUBMED, Embase, and Eline. Of the 1442 studies initially identified, 7 studies met all inclusion criteria, all of which were level III or IV evidence. All 7 studies evaluated postoperative instability, but no study reported a statistically significant difference in instability rates between the groups. Dislocations occurred in 5 patients (5/679, 0.7%) with subscapularis repair and 8 patients (8/527, 1.5%) without repair. A nonsignificant difference in the risk of instability for surgeries with repair compared to surgeries without repair was found (overall risk difference: 0.01, random effects 95% confidence interval: -0.00 to 0.02, P = .11). This review suggests no difference in postoperative shoulder instability rates between patients that underwent primary RTSA with or without subsequent repair of the subscapularis tendon. Interestingly, one study comparing implants with a medialized or nonlateralized implant showed a significantly increased rate of dislocation with the medialized group compared to the lateralized group. When these groups were then stratified based on subscapularis repair status, there was no increased risk with a nonrepaired tendon. This study suggests that implant design may have more influence on the stability of RTSA than subscapularis status. However, overall, there does appear to be a trend suggesting improved postoperative clinical outcomes and active range of motion for patients with a subscapularis repair vs. without a repair. Further research is needed to better elucidate the ideal combination of surgical technique and implant design to minimize postoperative glenohumeral joint instability while optimizing postoperative clinical outcomes and range of motion after primary RTSA.

Limited value of current shoulder arthroplasty registries in evidence-based shoulder surgery: a review of 7 national registries

National shoulder arthroplasty registries are currently used to assess incidence, indication, type of prosthesis and revision, but they seem to lack sufficient information to lead to evidence based decision-making in shoulder surgery. There appears to be a large difference in registered parameters and outcome measurement per country. First we investigated whether existing registries have sufficient common datasets to enable pooling of data. Second, we determined whether known risk factors for prosthetic failure are being recorded. Through a non-systematic literature review studies on registries were analyzed for included parameters. Seven national registries were scrutinized for the data collected and these were classified according to categories of risk factors for failure: patient-, implant and surgeon related, and other parameters. This shows a large heterogeneity of registered parameters between countries. The majority of parameters shown to be relevant to outcome and failure of shoulder prostheses are not included in the studied registries. International agreement on parameters and outcome measurement for registries is paramount to enable pooling and comparison of data. If we intend to use the registries to provide us with evidence to improve prosthetic shoulder surgery, we need adjustment of the different parameters to be included.

Posterior-approach total shoulder arthroplasty: a case series with a minimum of 2-year outcomes

BACKGROUND

A posterior approach to shoulder arthroplasty has been described that may improve exposure to the retroverted glenoid and spare the rotator cuff. The purpose of this study was to evaluate posterior total shoulder arthroplasty (PTSA) at a minimum of 2 years.

METHODS

Between September 2016 and October 2017, 28 patients (30 shoulders) who underwent PTSA were retrospectively identified. Patients were monitored at baseline and at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, and a minimum of 2 years after surgery for range of motion, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) and Simple Shoulder Test scores, radiographic outcomes, complications, and patient satisfaction. Radiographs were assessed for head height, neck-shaft angle, humeral head centering, and the presence or absence of glenoid-component cement lines. Repeated-measures analysis-of-variance models were implemented to compare the means for each outcome variable over time.

RESULTS

Of the 28 patients (30 shoulders), 24 patients (26 shoulders) (87%) were available for follow-up at a minimum of 2 years (average, 31.2 months; range, 23-40 months). At latest follow-up, the average ASES pain score was 45.2 (standard deviation [SD], 10.9; range, 20-50; 95% confidence interval [CI], 40.8-49.6); average ASES function score, 42.3 (SD, 8.9; range, 21.7-50; 95% CI, 38.7-45.8); average ASES total score, 87.5 (SD, 18.8; range, 31.7-100; 95% CI, 79.8-95.1); and average Simple Shoulder Test score, 10.2 (SD, 2.0; range, 5-12; 95% CI, 9.4-11.0). Average forward flexion was 164° (SD, 13.9°; range, 130°-180°; 95% CI, 158.3°-170.4°); average external rotation, 78° (SD, 9.2°; range, 55°-90°; 95% CI, 74.3°-82.3°); and average internal rotation, T10 (SD, 2; range, L3 to T6; 95% CI, T10 to T8). The average head height was 0.86 mm above the greater tuberosity (range, -6.5 to 6.9 mm), the average neck-shaft angle was 128° (range, 113°-148°), and the average implant placement was 0.12 mm superior to the center of the neck cut (range, -3.3 to 3.5 mm). Six implants were considered malpositioned based on the criterion of >5 mm of head height above or below the tuberosity or >2 mm off-center. Glenoid cement lines were present in 7 shoulders. Two patients experienced complications: 1 patient had symptomatic glenoid loosening 29 months postoperatively that required revision to an anterior reverse total shoulder arthroplasty, and 1 patient had postoperative weakness that resolved by 6 months.

CONCLUSION

PTSA is safe and efficacious at 2 years, spares the rotator cuff, and may improve early postoperative function. PTSA is more easily performed with stemless arthroplasty. Challenges with creation of the humeral head osteotomy and identification of the center of the cut humeral head surface can affect the accuracy of implant positioning. Further improvements in technique will likely improve the feasibility of this approach.

Systematic review and network meta-analysis of subscapularis management techniques in anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Controversy exists regarding the optimal subscapularis management technique in patients undergoing anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty. The purpose of this study was to compare clinical, radiographic, and functional outcomes between subscapularis tenotomy (ST), lesser tuberosity osteotomy (LTO), and subscapularis peel (SP) techniques.

METHODS

We performed a level III systematic review and network meta-analysis comparing ST, LTO, and SP in patients undergoing anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty. Our primary collection endpoints included range of motion, subscapularis function, subscapularis healing, functional patient-reported outcomes, complications, and revision surgery. Data were pooled and network meta-analysis was performed owing to the comparison of 3 groups.

RESULTS

Eight studies met our inclusion criteria for meta-analysis. There was no difference in sex or primary diagnosis between the 3 cohorts. No significant difference was found in postoperative external rotation or forward flexion between the groups. Meta-analysis found the SP cohort to have significantly greater internal rotation strength than the ST cohort. The belly-press test results were negative most commonly in the LTO group, and there was a significant difference compared with the ST or SP group (P < .0001). The weighted-mean healing rate for the LTO site was 98.9% on radiographic imaging. There was a significantly higher ultrasound healing rate in the LTO cohort than in the ST and SP cohorts. All groups had good postoperative patient-reported outcome scores (average American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score range, 78.6-87) and a relatively low rate of complications (3%).

CONCLUSION

This network meta-analysis demonstrates that the LTO group has superior healing and postoperative subscapularis-specific physical examination test results compared with the ST and SP groups. However, no difference in postoperative range of motion was found between the groups, and all techniques demonstrated good functional patient-reported outcomes, with a low rate of postoperative complications. These findings provide evidence-based support that ST, SP, and LTO all demonstrate similar outcomes; therefore, selection should be based on surgeon experience and comfort.

Posterior approach shoulder arthroplasty: a cadaveric study assessing access

BACKGROUND

Posterior shoulder arthroplasty is an approach to shoulder replacement. The goal of this cadaveric study was to determine anatomic feasibility for posterior approach shoulder arthroplasty by evaluating access to the glenoid, humerus, and canal.

METHODS

Twelve fresh frozen shoulders (10 males; 2 females) (mean age, 76 [range, 55-92 years]; weight, 79 kg [range, 34-125 kg]) were used. Traditional exposure techniques and retractors were used to evaluate direct access. Exposure to the glenoid and humerus was evaluated using digital imaging software. Successful placement from stemmed arthroplasty was evaluated using digital radiographs and imaging software.

RESULTS

The posterior approach permitted direct access to 88.8% ± 8.1% of the glenoid. There was access to the center of the humeral head cut surface in 12 of 12 specimens. In 10 specimens, there was 100% access to the entire cut surface of the humerus and peripheral edges. The average access to the humerus was 95.3% ± 13.4%. Average angulation with stem placement was 0.73° of varus (range, 4.4° of varus to 3.5° of valgus). Regarding lateral plane angulation, there was an average of 0.33° of posterior angulation (range, 3.3° of posterior angulation to 2.5° of anterior angulation).

CONCLUSION

Access to the center of the glenoid and humerus was achieved in all cases. More research is needed to evaluate the clinical efficacy of posterior shoulder arthroplasty, including mid- and long-term outcome and safety studies.

Subscapularis-sparing approaches in shoulder arthroplasty: A systematic review

Background

Novel approaches for anatomic and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (aTSA and rTSA) that spare the subscapularis (SSC) have recently been described. Outcomes for the SSC-sparing approach were evaluated through this systematic review.

Methods

Medline, Embase, PubMed, and CENTRAL were searched.

Results

From 2051 citations, 8 studies were included (aTSA group, n = 241; rTSA group, n = 68). SSC-sparing aTSA and rTSA were associated with significant postoperative improvements in shoulder function and range of motion at 12- to 24-month follow-up.

Conclusion

The SSC-sparing approach may provide a safe alternative for up to two years post-surgery. Evidence for long-term use remains inconclusive.

Single-row vs. double-row refixation of the subscapularis tendon after primary anatomic shoulder arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

The postoperative integrity of the subscapularis tendon after primary anatomical shoulder arthroplasty has a significant effect on postoperative results. A transosseus Single Row Refixation technique (SRR) has shown up to 30% of partial tears in literature, a modified Double Row Refixation technique (DRR) has biomechanically shown a significantly reduced tear rate, but is yet to be proven in a clinical setting. Thus, we compared the SRR to the DRR technique using clinical outcome parameters and ultrasound examination.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

36 patients (40 shoulders; 20f, 16 m; øage: 66 years) were included in our retrospective cohort study. 20 shoulders were treated with the SRR technique (12f, 8 m; FU ø40.9 months) and 20 with the DRR technique (11f, 9 m; FU ø31.6 months). The SRR was performed with three to five transosseus mattress sutures. DRR consisted of two medial placed transosseus sutures and four laterally placed single tendon-to-tendon sutures. The postoperative subscapularis integrity was evaluated by ultrasound examination, the clinical outcome was assessed with the Constant-Murley Score (CS) and the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Score (ASES).

RESULTS

The subscapularis tendon was intact in 14 patients (70%) after SRR, whereas 18 patients (90%) treated with the DRR demonstrated a sonographically intact postoperative subscapularis tendon. The CS was 61.4 points in the SRR cohort and 67.3 points in the DRR cohort (p = 0.314). No significant differences were found in both cohorts preoperative (øSRR: 21.3 points; øDRR: 16.2 points, p = 0.720) and postoperative absolute ASES Scores (øSRR: 70.2 points; øDRR: 73.0 points, p = 0.792). However, the DRR cohort showed a statistical tendency to a higher postoperative ASES increase than the SRR cohort (øSRR-ASES increase: 48.9 points; øDRR-ASES increase: 56.8 points, p = 0.067).

CONCLUSION

The results of this study show that application of the DRR technique can significantly reduce the total rate of postoperative subscapularis tears what effects a clinical tendency towards higher ASES improvements and a better range of motion compared to the SRR technique.

Distal tibia allograft glenoid reconstruction for shoulder instability: outcomes after lesser tuberosity osteotomy

BACKGROUND

Distal tibia allograft reconstruction of the glenoid in shoulder instability has garnered significant attention over the last decade. Prior studies demonstrate significant improvement in all reported patient outcomes albeit the approach is through a subscapularis split. There have not been prior studies evaluating outcomes after lesser tuberosity osteotomy which provides excellent exposure to the anterior glenoid.We hypothesize there is significant improvement in functional outcomes and no deleterious effects after lesser tuberosity osteotomy for distal tibia allograft reconstruction of the glenoid for shoulder instability.

METHODS

A retrospective review was performed from 2016 of 2019 of patients undergoing distal tibia allograft reconstruction of the glenoid through a lesser tuberosity osteotomy. Patients were indicated if they had recurrent anterior shoulder instability with >20% glenoid bone loss and evidence of an off-track lesion. Clinical, imaging, and operative data were evaluated. Objective follow-up data evaluated at minimum 2 years included radiographs, range of motion, DASH, SANE, VAS, SST, ASES, and Constant scores.

RESULTS

A total of 12 patients were available with average follow-up 28 months, average age 26 years old, and average glenoid bone loss of 33%. The patients demonstrated significant improvement in their clinical outcomes at final follow-up: DASH 42.9-8.9 (P = .004), SANE 32.2-85 (P = .00005), VAS 4.6-1.1 (P = .003), SST 7-11.4 (P = .01), ASES 50.2-90.5 (P = .001), and Constant 37.6-86.2 (P = .01). Range of motion at final follow-up was forward flexion to 161.4° (135-170°), external rotation 49.5° (40-65°), and internal rotation to T12-L1 (T7-L2) vertebral body.

CONCLUSION

The present study demonstrates the effectiveness of a lesser tuberosity osteotomy in exposure of the glenoid for reconstruction with a distal tibia allograft. The functional integrity of the subscapularis is maintained and the patient-reported outcomes are comparable with current literature.

The V-shaped subscapularis tenotomy for anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty

PURPOSE

Management of the subscapularis tendon during anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) remains controversial. In our unit, subscapularis tenotomy is the preferred technique; however, the potential for tendon gapping and failure is recognised. The purpose of this study is to describe and provide early clinical results of a novel, laterally based V-shaped tenotomy (VT) technique hypothesised to provide greater initial repair strength and resistance to gapping than a transverse tenotomy (TT), with both clinically and radiologically satisfactory post-operative tendon healing and function.

METHODS

A retrospective study of patients who underwent primary TSA with VT over a three year period was performed using shoulder and subscapularis-specific outcome scores, radiographs, and ultrasound. A separate cohort of patients who underwent TSA using a subscapularis sparing approach was also reviewed to provide comparative clinical outcomes of a group with TSA and an un-violated subscapularis.

RESULTS

Eighteen patients were reviewed at mean 30.4 months (± 11.7). Constant (78.2 ± 12.3), UCLA (8.4 ± 1.5), pain VAS (2.3 ± 2.8), and strength in internal rotation were no different from the comparison group. Likewise, neither were the clinical outcomes of range-of-motion, belly-press, lift-off, and shirt-tuck tests. One patient (5.5%) was found to have a failed subscapularis repair on ultrasound.

CONCLUSION

VT during TSA appears to provide healing rates at least equal to those reported for TT, and not dissimilar from those of lesser tuberosity osteotomy. Clinical outcomes are comparable to reported results in the literature for alternative techniques, and not different from those observed here in a comparison cohort with TSA performed without violating the subscapularis tendon. VT therefore potentially offers a more effective and secure tendon repair than a traditional TT, with at least comparable clinical outcomes.

Subscapularis integrity, function and EMG/nerve conduction study findings following reverse total shoulder arthroplasty

Background

During reverse total shoulder arthroplasty, the functionality of the subscapularis remains unknown. The purpose of this study was to determine the integrity and function of the repaired subscapularis after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty using ultrasound, electromyography (EMG), and nerve conduction studies (NCS) to assess postoperative tendon healing, muscle, and nerve function.

Materials and methods

Patients who underwent reverse total shoulder arthroplasty and repair with minimum 6-month follow-up were included in the study. Patient-reported outcome, physical examination, ultrasound examination of the subscapularis tendon, subscapularis EMG, and lower subscapular NCS were performed. In addition, contralateral subscapularis ultrasound, EMG, and lower subscapular nerve nerve NCS were performed to establish normative values (abnormal defined at >20% increased latency or >50% decreased amplitude). Phi coefficients of association and point biserial coefficients were used to correlate the ultrasound examination, EMG, and NCS results with the functional outcomes.

Results

A total of 20 patients were included. Four patients had abnormal but intact subscapularis tendons on ultrasound. Nine patients had abnormal lower subscapular NCS compared with the contralateral shoulder. All patients had normal subscapularis EMGs. No significant correlation was found between the ultrasound and NCS results. No significant correlations were found between the ultrasound or the NCS results and any of the independent outcome variables.

Conclusion

This study demonstrates that the subscapularis remains neurologically functional after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty, based on EMG and NCS findings. Although side-to-side differences in lower subscapular NCS were identified in 45% of the postoperative shoulders, these abnormalities did not correlate with functional outcomes.

Artroplastia de ombro: tenotomia do subescapular versus osteotomia do tubérculo menor

Objective  To evaluate and compare subscapular muscle function among patients undergoing subscapular tenotomy (Group A) and lesser tuberosity osteotomy (Group B), in patients treated with total and partial anatomic shoulder arthroplasty for primary osteoarthrosis.

Methods  Retrospective study of patients with primary glenohumeral osteoarthrosis surgically undergoing total or partial anatomic shoulder prosthesis implant, evaluated by clinical examination, imaging exams, analogue pain scale and Constant and Murley functional score. A total of 28 patients were evaluated, totalizing a sample of 32 operated shoulders. The minimum follow-up was of 12 months (mean 47.45 months).

Results  Among patients submitted to subscapularis tendon tenotomy, 10 had an ultrasound with total rupture of its thickness (56%). All of the patients of the group B showed lesser tuberosity healing. There was no difference between groups comparing strength evaluated by Belly press and Bear hug tests as well as clinical outcome, through the Constant and Murley score.

Conclusions  We did not find differences between Groups A and B evidenciated by comparing strength in the Lift-off test, in the Belly press and Bear hug tests and through he Constant and Murley score.

Subscapularis Function After Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Using Lesser Tuberosity Osteotomy or Tenotomy

INTRODUCTION

Subscapularis dysfunction is a recognized complication after total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA). However, optimal subscapularis management during TSA is controversial. Subscapularis tenotomy (ST) has been used, whereas lesser tuberosity osteotomy (LTO) has gained popularity. This study compares the clinical outcomes in patients undergoing TSA with either ST or LTO, focusing on subscapularis strength and overall function.

METHODS

Records were reviewed for TSA performed from 2010 to 2016 by a single surgeon at one institution. Patient age, sex, hand dominance, and the time of follow-up were recorded. Radiographs were obtained and interpreted. Range of motion was measured and the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores obtained. A graded belly-press test was used to determine the overall subscapularis function. Subscapularis strength was measured during a resisted belly-press maneuver. Statistical analysis was performed using a paired Student t-test or Fisher exact test, with P < 0.05 determining statistical significance.

RESULTS

Overall, 28 shoulders constituted the LTO group with 37 in the ST group. No difference was found regarding age, whether their surgical site was their dominant extremity, or the time to follow-up. Radiographically, all osteotomies went on to union, with one malunion noted. Range of motion was equivalent. No statistical difference was noted in subscapularis strength or in the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores. The overall subscapularis function also failed to show any notable difference.

DISCUSSION

In conclusion, either LTO or ST can be used during TSA to achieve successful clinical outcomes. The method of subscapularis management did not affect the subscapularis strength or overall function.

A randomized controlled trial comparing subscapularis tenotomy with peel in anatomic shoulder arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Controversy exists regarding the optimal technique of subscapularis tendon mobilization during anatomic shoulder arthroplasty. The purpose of this prospective, randomized, double-blind study was to compare internal rotation strength in the belly-press position and functional outcomes between the subscapularis tenotomy and subscapularis peel approaches during shoulder arthroplasty.

METHODS

Patients undergoing anatomic shoulder arthroplasty were randomized to either a tenotomy or peel approach. The primary outcome was internal rotation strength in the belly-press position, measured by an electronic handheld dynamometer at 24 months postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included the Western Ontario Osteoarthritis of the Shoulder (WOOS) index score, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, range of motion, radiographic lucencies, and adverse events.

RESULTS

We randomized 100 patients to subscapularis tenotomy (n = 47) or peel (n = 53). Eighty-one percent of the cohort returned for 24 months' follow-up. Compared with baseline measures, mean internal rotation strength in the belly-press position and WOOS and ASES scores improved in both groups at final follow-up (P < .0001). Intention-to-treat analysis for internal rotation strength at 24 months revealed no significant difference (P = .57) between tenotomy (mean, 4.9 kg; SD, 3.8 kg) and peel (mean, 5.4 kg; SD, 3.9 kg). Comparison of WOOS and ASES scores demonstrated no significant differences between groups at any time point. The healing rates by ultrasound were 72% for tenotomy and 71% for peel (P = .99).

DISCUSSION

No statistically significant difference in internal rotation strength was identified between the tenotomy and peel groups. The secondary outcomes were not significantly different between groups.

Healing Rate and Clinical Outcomes of Lesser Tuberosity Osteotomy for Anatomic Shoulder Arthroplasty

Several techniques are available for subscapularis management during total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA). Lesser tuberosity osteotomy (LTO) is advocated owing to improved biomechanical strength and high rates of healing. However, displacement or nonunion of the LTO could theoretically cause functional deficits for the affected shoulder. The purpose of this study is to examine the healing rate and clinical outcomes of LTO in patients undergoing anatomic TSA.

Methods

A retrospective review of our institution's prospectively enrolled TSA registry was performed. Patients undergoing primary TSA who had an LTO performed and radiographs at a minimum of 3 months postoperatively were included. Two fellowship-trained shoulder and elbow surgeons reviewed all radiographs and categorized LTO healing into three groups: healed, nondisplaced nonunion, or displaced nonunion. Physical examination data and patient-reported outcome scores including American Shoulder and Elbow Score, Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation scores, and the Veteran Rand mental and physical component scores were obtained at a median of 1 year after surgery. Comparative statistical analysis was performed on the healed versus nondisplaced nonunion groups.

Results

We included 142 shoulders in 130 patients who met the inclusion criteria with an average age of 65.2 years (SD: 10.3). Radiographic evaluation at a median of 1.0 years postoperatively (range: 6 months to 2.2 years) revealed 124 (87%) healed LTO, 12 (8%) nondisplaced nonunions, and six (5%) displaced nonunions. The median American Shoulder and Elbow Score total score was 89.2 (IQR: 72.2, 98.3) in the healed LTO group versus 96.7 (30, 98.3) in the LTO nondisplaced nonunion group (P = 0.9637). The median Veteran Rand mental component was 55.1 (IQR: 43.4, 61.0) in the healed LTO group versus 54.6 (38.8, 58.2) in the LTO nondisplaced nonunion group (P = 0.5679). The median Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation score was 85.0 (IQR: 70.0, 95.0) in the LTO-healed group versus 75.1 (35.0, 97.1) in the LTO nondisplaced nonunion group (P = 0.7699). There were no significant differences in revision surgery occurrence between the groups to address subscapularis instability: one patient in the LTO-healed group underwent revision surgery for subscapularis repair 3 months after primary surgery because of continued pain and weakness, and no patients in the other LTO groups underwent revision surgery.

Conclusion

Although there is a risk of nonunion and displacement using the LTO technique in TSA, the overall clinical outcomes and radiographic union rates are high with a very low risk of revision surgery. In addition, radiographic evidence of nonunion does not significantly correlate with clinical outcomes.

Posterior Approach Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Retrospective Analysis of Short-term Results

Subscapularis dysfunction and failure are the leading causes of complications of total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA). An approach to shoulder arthroplasty has been described that may improve exposure to the retroverted glenoid and spare the rotator cuff. This article details the 6-month clinical outcomes of the first 26 patients who underwent TSA using a posterior approach. Thirty-one patients who underwent TSA using a posterior approach between September 2016 and October 2017 were identified retrospectively. Patients were assessed for American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) scores, Simple Shoulder Test (SST) scores, range of motion, complications, radiographic outcomes, and patient satisfaction. Statistical models were used to compare the means for each outcome variable over time. Of the initial 31 patients, 26 patients were available for follow-up at a minimum of 6 months; the remaining 5 patients did not return for follow-up at 6 months. Significant improvement in each outcome variable from baseline was noted by 6 weeks postoperatively. Further improvement was observed at 3 months for SST and external rotation, and at 6 months for ASES function and forward flexion. All outcome variables demonstrated some improvement from one time point to the next. Posterior TSA is a safe and efficacious procedure at 6 months. Compared with traditional TSA, posterior cuff-sparing approaches may improve posterior joint access, posterior soft tissue balancing, and long-term rotator cuff issues. [Orthopedics. 2020; 43(1):e15-e20.].

Subscapularis structural integrity and function after arthroscopic Latarjet procedure at a minimum 2-year follow-up

BACKGROUND

Subscapularis function after arthroscopic Bankart repair has been widely studied. However, data regarding subscapularis performance after arthroscopic Latarjet procedures are lacking. This study aimed to evaluate subscapularis clinical and radiologic performance after arthroscopic Latarjet procedures.

METHODS

We included 40 patients who underwent arthroscopic Latarjet procedure with a minimum 2-year follow-up. Clinical evaluation included Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index and Rowe scores, specific subscapularis isokinetic study, and lift-off tests. Contralateral measurements were used for comparison. Computed tomographic evaluation included graft consolidation, muscle dimensions, and degree of fatty atrophy, calculated as the mean muscle attenuation (MMA).

RESULTS

There was a decrease of 8.3% of maximum internal rotation peak torque in the operated arm (P = .02). However, there was no significant difference in the agonist-antagonist ratio: 76.9% in the operated arm and 76% in the contralateral (P = .82). Lift-off strength test demonstrated a decrease in the first year but not at final follow-up (P = .38). There was a significant decrease in lift-off distance of 23% compared to the contralateral side (P < .001). Subscapularis MMA was diminished when compared to the infraspinatus/teres minor (P < .001) at the expense of its upper part (P = .03). Hyperlaxity and number of dislocation episodes were correlated to a lower MMA (P = .046 and P = .005).

CONCLUSION

Arthroscopic Latarjet procedures provide satisfactory clinical results. There seems to be a diminished subscapularis MMA depending on its superior half. Hyperlaxity and number of previous dislocations were correlated to a lower MMA. Although there was a decrease in the maximum internal rotation peak torque, we did not find any difference in the agonist-antagonist ratio or in the final lift-off strength between sides.

Biomechanical comparison of subscapularis peel and lesser tuberosity osteotomy for double-row subscapularis repair technique in a cadaveric arthroplasty model

INTRODUCTION

Management of the subscapularis during shoulder arthroplasty is controversial. The purpose of this study was to compare the biomechanical performance of subscapularis peel (SP) and lesser tuberosity osteotomy (LTO) in a cadaveric model.

METHODS

The subscapularis and proximal humerus were dissected from all soft tissues in 21 fresh-frozen human cadaveric shoulders and randomized to undergo SP, LTO, or standard subscapularis tenotomy (ST, control). For SP and LTO, six #5 sutures were passed through eyelets in the implant (on lateral border and through drill holes in bicipital groove [2] and under trunion [4]). Double-row repair was performed using two lateral row transosseous sutures and four medial row sutures through the tendon (SP) or osseotendinous junction (LTO). Biomechanical properties and mode of failure were tested.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in elongation amplitude, cyclic elongation, or maximum load to failure between the three groups (P > 0.05). Mean stiffness was significantly higher in LTO (P = 0.009 vs. SP and ST). In the ST group, 7/7 specimens failed at the tendon-suture interface. For SP, 4/7 failed at the tendon-suture interface, one at the suture-bone interface, one fractured around the implant stem, and one at the knots. For LTO, 3/7 failed at the tendon-suture interface, two at the suture-bone interface and two fractured around the implant stem.

CONCLUSIONS

In this cadaveric model, subscapularis repair via ST, SP, and LTO techniques was biomechanically equivalent. Additional studies are needed to confirm these findings and determine the influence of biologic healing on healing rates and clinical outcomes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

N/a, biomechanical laboratory study.

Minimum Clinically Important Difference: Current Trends in the Orthopaedic Literature, Part I: Upper Extremity: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

The minimum clinically important difference (MCID) attempts to define the patient's experience of treatment outcomes. Efforts at calculating the MCID have yielded multiple and inconsistent MCID values. The purposes of this review were to describe the usage of the MCID in the most recent orthopaedic literature, to explain the limitations of its current uses, and to clarify the underpinnings of MCID calculation. Subsequently, we hope that the information presented here will help practitioners to better understand the MCID and to serve as a guide for future efforts to calculate the MCID. The first part of this review focuses on the upper-extremity orthopaedic literature. Part II will focus on the lower-extremity orthopaedic literature.

METHODS

A review was conducted of the 2014 to 2016 publications in The Journal of Arthroplasty, The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery, The American Journal of Sports Medicine, Foot & Ankle International, Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma, Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics, and Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. Only clinical science articles utilizing patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) scores were included in the analysis. A keyword search was then performed to identify articles that calculated or referenced the MCID. Articles were then further categorized into upper-extremity and lower-extremity publications. MCID utilization in the selected articles was subsequently characterized and recorded.

RESULTS

The MCID was referenced in 129 (7.5%) of 1,709 clinical science articles that utilized PROMs: 52 (40.3%) of 129 were related to the upper extremity, 5 (9.6%) of 52 independently calculated MCID values, and 47 (90.4%) of 52 used previously published MCID values as a gauge of their own results. MCID values were considered or calculated for 16 PROMs; 12 of these were specific to the upper extremity. Six different methods were used to calculate the MCID. Calculated MCIDs had a wide range of values for the same PROM (e.g., 8 to 36 points for Constant-Murley scores and 6.4 to 17 points for American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons [ASES] scores).

CONCLUSIONS

Determining useful MCID values remains elusive and is compounded by the proliferation of PROMs in the field of orthopaedics. The fundamentals of MCID calculation methods should be critically evaluated. If necessary, these methods should be corrected or abandoned. Furthermore, the type of change intended to be measured should be clarified: beneficial, detrimental, or small or large changes. There should also be assurance that the calculation method actually measures the intended change. Finally, the measurement error should consistently be reported.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

The MCID is increasingly used as a measure of patients' improvement. However, the MCID does not yet adequately capture the clinical importance of patients' improvement.

Subscapularis management in stemless total shoulder arthroplasty: tenotomy versus peel versus lesser tuberosity osteotomy

BACKGROUND

It is unknown whether subscapularis management technique has an influence on the outcomes and complications of stemless total shoulder arthroplasty. The purpose of this study, therefore, was to compare outcomes and complications between subscapularis tenotomy, peel, and lesser tuberosity osteotomy used during stemless shoulder arthroplasty.

METHODS

We reviewed 188 stemless anatomic total shoulder arthroplasties and compared clinical and functional outcomes between those performed through a subscapularis tenotomy (n = 68), subscapularis peel (n = 65), or lesser tuberosity osteotomy (n = 55). Patients were followed up clinically and radiographically at 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years postoperatively.

RESULTS

At 2 years postoperatively, no statistically significant differences in visual analog scale pain scores, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores, or patient-reported instability (P ≥ .19) were found between groups. Active external rotation was greater in the peel group (P = .006) than in the tenotomy group but was not different compared with the lesser tuberosity osteotomy group (P = .07). No statistically significant difference in clinical subscapularis failures was noted between groups (P = .11); however, 2 patients in the peel group sustained a subscapularis failure requiring reoperation.

DISCUSSION

The results of this multicenter comparative analysis show that all 3 subscapularis management techniques are effective and safe in the short term when used with stemless anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty.

Cemented humeral stem versus press-fit humeral stem in total shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis

AIMS

The aim of this study was to evaluate the differences in revision and complication rates, functional outcomes, and radiological outcomes between cemented and press-fit humeral stems in primary anatomical total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted searching for studies that included patients who underwent primary anatomical TSA for primary osteoarthritis or rheumatoid arthritis.

RESULTS

There was a total of 36 studies with 927 cemented humeral stems and 1555 press-fit stems. The revision rate was 5.4% (95% confidence interval (CI) 3.9 to 7.4) at a mean of 89 months for cemented stems, and 2.4% (95% CI 1.1 to 4.7) at a mean of 40 months for press-fit stems. A priori subgroup analysis to control for follow-up periods demonstrated similar revision rates: 2.3% (95% CI 1.1 to 4.7) for cemented stems versus 1.8% (95% CI 1.4 to 2.9) for press-fit stems. Exploratory meta-regression found that longer follow-up was a moderating variable for revision (p = 0.003).

CONCLUSION

Cement fixation had similar revision rates when compared to press-fit stems at short- to midterm follow-up. Rotator cuff pathology was a prevalent complication in both groups but is likely not related to fixation type. Overall, with comparable revision rates, possible easier revision, and decreased operative time, humeral press-fit fixation may be an optimal choice for primary anatomical TSA in patients with sufficient bone stock. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2019;101-B:1107-1114.

Lesser tuberosity osteotomy in total shoulder arthroplasty: impact of radiographic healing on outcomes

BACKGROUND

Lesser tuberosity osteotomy (LTO) has gained popularity in anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA); however, healing rates have not been universally high. This study examined differences in outcomes based on variations in LTO healing.

METHODS

A retrospective review identified primary TSA patients with 2-year minimum follow-up treated with a LTO. Postoperative radiographs classified LTO healing as "bony union," "nondisplaced nonunion," "displaced nonunion," and "not seen," creating 4 cohorts. Comparisons were made among patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), motion, and radiographic evidence of component loosening.

RESULTS

The study cohort consisted of 189 patients who met inclusion criteria, with an average age of 69.5 years (range, 32-89 years) and follow-up of 50 months (range, 24-95 months). There were 143 patients with union, 16 with nondisplaced nonunion, 14 with displaced nonunion, and 16 not seen. There were no differences in preoperative comparisons. All cohorts demonstrated significant improvements in PROMs and ranges of motion; however, the displaced nonunion cohort had no improvement in Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (0.114) or internal rotation (P = .279). Patients with displaced nonunion had lower postoperative functional scores (Simple Shoulder Test and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores; P < .01), and higher pain scores (visual analog scale for pain; P < .01). However, 85.7% of patients reported they would have the same procedure again. Simple Shoulder Test (2.5) and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score (37.5) improvements exceeded minimal clinically important difference thresholds for TSA. A higher rate of glenoid gross loosening was present in the displaced nonunion cohort (3 patients [21.4%]; P < .01). There were no cases of loose humeral stems.

CONCLUSION

Patients with a displaced nonunion LTO site have lower functional scores and higher pain scores but still achieve substantial clinical improvement and high satisfaction rates.

Comparison of Subscapularis Management and Repair Techniques

Management of the subscapularis tendon is a crucial step during the approach for total shoulder arthroplasty. The method of mobilizing the tendon and the technique used to repair it determine the initial integrity of the subscapularis and impact its capacity to heal. Currently, there exist 3 well-described and well-studied approaches to managing and repairing the subscapularis: subscapularis tenotomy, subscapularis peel, and lesser tuberosity osteotomy. More recently, a subscapularis-sparing approach has been proposed as an option. There is debate in the literature regarding which technique provides optimal strength and stability for subscapularis repair following shoulder arthroplasty. In this symposium, we provide an overview of each of the techniques and review the biomechanical studies comparing them.

A Systematic Review of Proposed Rehabilitation Guidelines Following Anatomic and Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) is indicated for patients with glenohumeral arthritis. In this procedure, the humeral head and glenoid surface are replaced with prosthetic components. Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) is indicated for patients with glenohumeral arthritis and a poorly functioning rotator cuff. In this procedure, a glenosphere articulates with a humerosocket. While those surgeries are commonly performed, a thorough review of the literature is required to determine the areas of agreement and variations in postoperative rehabilitation.

OBJECTIVES

To describe the literature on rehabilitation protocols following anatomic TSA and RTSA.

METHODS

For this systematic review, a computerized search was conducted in medical databases from inception to May 21, 2018 for relevant descriptive studies on TSA and RTSA rehabilitation protocols. The methodological index for nonrandomized studies tool and the modified Downs and Black tool for randomized controlled trials were used for assessment of the individual studies.

RESULTS

Sixteen studies met the inclusion criteria, of which 1 provided level I evidence, 1 provided level III evidence, 2 provided level IV evidence, and 12 provided level V evidence. Ten of the studies described rehabilitation guidelines for TSA and 6 described those for RTSA. Following TSA, the use of a sling was recommended for a duration that varied from 3 to 8 weeks, and 4 of the 10 published protocols included resisted exercise during the initial stage of healing (the first 6 weeks after surgery). Seven of 10 published protocols recommended limiting shoulder external rotation to 30° and that passive range of motion be fully restored by 12 weeks post surgery. Suggested use of a sling post RTSA varied from "for comfort only" to 6 weeks, motion parameters varied from no passive range of motion to precautionary range limits, and all protocols agreed on performing deltoid isometric exercises early post surgery. There was a high level of heterogeneity for the rehabilitation guidelines and associated precautions for both TSA and RTSA.

CONCLUSION

The majority of published protocols were descriptive in nature. Published rehabilitation strategies following TSA and RTSA are based on biomechanical principles, healing time frames, and exercise loading principles, with little consistency among protocols. There is a need to determine optimal rehabilitation approaches post TSA and RTSA based on clinical outcomes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapy, level 5. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2019;49(5):337-346. doi:10.2519/jospt.2019.8616.

Midterm results of anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty with a third-generation implant

BACKGROUND

Anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) provides reliable, reproducible, and durable results; however, outcomes of many modern TSA systems are lacking. The present study reports early to midterm results of a third-generation TSA system using a traditional-length press-fit humeral stem and cemented glenoid.

METHODS

A retrospective review was conducted of TSA patients with minimum 2-year clinical follow-up. Patient-reported outcome measures, including Simple Shoulder Test, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Total, visual analog scale for pain, 12-Item Short Form Health Survey, and Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation, as well as measured active motion (forward elevation, external and internal rotation), were recorded at preoperative and postoperative intervals. Preoperative midglenoid axial computed tomography scans were used to evaluate eccentric glenoid wear, humeral head subluxation, and glenoid version. Most recent postoperative radiographs were used to evaluate glenoid loosening, humeral loosening, lesser tuberosity union, and medial calcar resorption. Patient satisfaction at final follow-up was reported as excellent, good, satisfied, or unsatisfied.

RESULTS

There were 267 patients who met inclusion criteria, with a mean age of 70.9 years and mean clinical follow-up of 47 months. Average glenoid retroversion was 9.7°, and 27% had eccentric glenoid wear. At final follow-up, measured motion and nearly all patient-reported outcome measures showed significant improvements, with 75.6% of patients rating their satisfaction as excellent. No patient was considered "at risk" for humeral stem loosening. Glenoid radiolucencies were seen in 13.5% of shoulders (7 gross loosening). Five patients were revised to reverse TSA.

CONCLUSION

TSA using a third-generation traditional-length press-fit stem and cemented glenoid provides excellent early to midterm outcomes with low rates of loosening and high rates of excellent satisfaction.

Subscapularis tenotomy versus lesser tuberosity osteotomy during total shoulder arthroplasty for primary osteoarthritis: a prospective, randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

There is no current consensus on subscapularis mobilization during total shoulder arthroplasty. The purpose of this prospective, randomized controlled trial was to compare functional and radiographic outcomes of the more traditional subscapularis tenotomy (ST) versus lesser tuberosity osteotomy (LTO).

METHODS

This study enrolled 60 shoulders in 59 patients with primary osteoarthritis. Thirty shoulders were preoperatively randomized to each group. Preoperative and 6-week, 3-month, 6-month, and 1-year postoperative data were collected. Ultrasound was performed at 3 months to evaluate subscapularis healing in tenotomy subjects, whereas radiographs were used to evaluate osteotomy healing. Intraoperative data included operative time, tenotomy or osteotomy repair time, and osteotomy thickness.

RESULTS

No significant differences in range of motion or clinical outcomes occurred at baseline or 1 year postoperatively between the 2 groups. The mean total case duration for ST was significantly less than that for LTO (129.3 minutes vs 152.7 minutes), along with a significantly shorter subscapularis repair time for ST (34.3 minutes vs 39.3 minutes, P = .024). At final follow-up, 27 of 29 LTO shoulders (93.1%) showed bone-to-bone healing on radiographs, whereas 26 of 30 ST shoulders (86.7%) had no full-thickness tear of the subscapularis on ultrasound at 3 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Both techniques produced successful objective and subjective clinical outcomes. LTO heals more reliably than ST. Mean total case and subscapularis repair times were significantly greater for LTO than for ST.

Blinded Ultrasound Examination of the Subscapularis Following Anatomic Shoulder Arthroplasty

Background

The subscapularis tendon is commonly released during shoulder arthroplasty, and its integrity and repair postoperatively have been shown important to help maximize patient function. However, diagnosing subscapular tendon failure can be difficult with magnetic resonance imaging secondary to metal artifact as well as very costly.

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to assess the utility of ultrasound imaging in evaluating subscapularis integrity at specific time points following shoulder arthroplasty, in a blinded fashion. Secondarily, we report on the correlation between the condition of the subscapularis and quality-of-life outcome measures.

Study Design

Prospective case series.

Methods

Ultrasounds were completed preoperatively and postoperatively at 1 week as well as at 1, 3, and 6 months. Each was read by a single musculoskeletal radiologist and categorized as “intact,” “torn,” or “unclear.” Clinical outcome was evaluated using the Western Ontario Osteoarthritis Shoulder (WOOS) index at these same time points.

Results

The final study group consisted of 35 procedures in 33 patients (19 females and 14 males, mean age 66 ± 9 years). Three patients had postoperative subscapularis failures that were confirmed in the operating room at the time of repair. Of 24 sonographs categorized as “unclear” in the postoperative period, the majority (n = 12, 50%) were taken at 1 week. Compared to preoperative scores, patients had lower WOOS scores at 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively (P < .001). Correlation analysis did not reveal an association between the ultrasound readings and the WOOS scores postoperatively.

Conclusion

The utility of ultrasound examination of the subscapularis tendon following shoulder arthroplasty is limited by timing and may be most useful when used by the physician within clinical context. Significant improvement was noted in disease-specific quality-of-life scores regardless of the status of the subscapularis tendon as read on ultrasound.

A Tensionable Method for Subscapularis Repair after Shoulder Arthroplasty

Background

This study compared the biomechanical properties of a new lesser tuberosity (LTO) repair with a tensionable construct with suture tape and preplaced racking hitches vs. a traditional LTO repair using 4 high-strength sutures. The hypothesis was that there would be no difference between the 2 constructs.

Methods

LTO repairs were performed on 6 matched, paired cadaveric shoulders after placement of an uncemented humeral stem. The LTO in group 1 was repaired with 4 high-strength #2 sutures, each passed individually through the subscapularis tendon. The LTO in group 2 was repaired with 2 suture tape loops with a preplaced racking hitch knot and 2 passes through the subscapularis tendon. All sutures were passed around the humeral stem before passing through the subscapularis tendon. The specimens then underwent cyclic displacement and load-to-failure testing.

Results

Load to failure was 209.6 ± 71.2 N in group 1 compared with 502.8 ± 168.6 N in group 2 (P = .018). There was no difference in displacement between the 2 groups. All failures in group 1 occurred by knot slippage. The mode of failure in group 2 was tendon tearing in 5 of 6 cases.

Conclusion

A simplified LTO repair with suture tape and compression bridge and a preplaced half racking knot achieves favorable biomechanical properties in a technically efficient manner that may be useful clinically.

Lesser Tuberosity Osteotomy in Anatomic Total Shoulder Arthroplasty

The deltopectoral exposure has earned the reputation as the “workhorse” approach to the shoulder. Due to the reproducible anatomy and its extensile nature, there is little debate when considering exposure in total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA). Despite this consensus, there is still significant variability in management of the subscapularis. Several repair techniques including a subscapularis tenotomy, peel, and lesser tuberosity osteotomy (LTO) have been developed to ensure healing and optimize function. This article focuses on performing a LTO in anatomic TSA. We will review the surgical technique and advantages in exposure in addition to biomechanical and clinical outcomes.

Treatment Outcomes of Lesser Tuberosity Osteotomy Nonunion After Total Shoulder Arthroplasty

Introduction

Lesser tuberosity osteotomy (LTO) during anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty has a 13% nonunion rate. Treatment for LTO nonunion is controversial and poorly described in the literature. The purpose of this study was to compare the surgical and nonsurgical treatment outcomes of LTO nonunion.

Methods

A retrospective case series of 9 consecutive patients with LTO nonunion after primary anatomic shoulder arthroplasty at 1 institution from 2010 to 2016 were studied. Outcomes measured were radiographic evaluation of LTO on axillary X-ray, clinical range of motion (ROM), subscapularis strength, and pain at the time of LTO nonunion diagnosis and after either conservative care or surgical repair of the LTO nonunion.

Results

LTO nonunion was treated surgically in 4 and conservatively in 5 patients with average follow-up of 30 and 22 months, respectively. There were no significant differences in age, sex, or smoking status between groups. Treatment decision was a shared model of surgeon and patient. Displaced LTO nonunion was treated surgically in 2 and conservatively in 3 patients. There were no differences in LTO union rate of 50% in the surgical versus 60% in the conservative group. Abdominal compression test was abnormal in 50% of surgical versus 40% of conservative groups. At follow-up, ROM was lower in the surgical group with 128° forward elevation (FE) and 33° external rotation (ER) compared to 148° FE and 62° ER. Only 1 patient with LTO nonunion required conversion to reverse replacement.

Conclusion

LTO nonunion after shoulder arthroplasty is rare. Surgical repair of LTO nonunion does not significantly improve clinical or radiographic outcomes compared to conservative care.

Subscapularis Management in Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: Current Evidence Comparing Peel, Osteotomy, and Tenotomy

The optimal approach to management of the subscapularis in total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) is controversial. Options include the subscapularis tenotomy, lesser tuberosity osteotomy (LTO), and peel. This review provides a summary of subscapularis anatomy and function, outcomes associated with subscapularis management options in TSA, and postoperative subscapularis deficiency. Based on the available literature, LTO appears to result in improved function and subscapularis integrity relative to tenotomy, while peel and LTO have generally led to equivalent outcomes. The highest level of evidence to date is derived from a randomized controlled trial that demonstrated that outcomes following peel and LTO were not significantly different. There is currently a paucity of high-quality evidence as most studies have consisted of small retrospective series with varying outcome measures. Furthermore, the optimal approach to establishing the diagnosis of subscapularis deficiency following TSA is unclear.