Successful injection of the acromioclavicular joint with use of ultrasound: anatomy, technique, and follow-up

A systematic review of the treatment of primary acromioclavicular joint osteoarthritis

Background

This systematic review aims to comprehensively summarise and present the available evidence for the treatment of primary acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) osteoarthritis (OA).

Methods

Five databases were searched for studies investigating the management of ACJ OA. Included were studies with participants with clinical/radiological signs of primary ACJ OA, an intervention and included a functional outcome measure.

Results

Forty-eight studies were included. Treatments consisted of physiotherapy (n = 1 study), medical only (n = 11) and operative management (n = 36). Operative studies included five comparative trials - physiotherapy versus surgery (n = 1) and open versus arthroscopic resection (n = 4). A total of 1902 shoulders were treated for ACJ OA, mean age (51 years), 58% male and mean follow-up (28.5 months). Treatment with injection showed a mean improvement of 50% in pain levels at follow-up (mean = 7.5 months). The commonest surgical procedure was arthroscopic excision of the distal clavicle and operative studies averaged 6 months of conservative management and a mean functional outcome of 87.8%.

Conclusion

Studies varied in indication, intervention and quality but it did not provide evidence that both non-operative and operative interventions are effective. There was no significant difference between open or arthroscopic distal clavicle excision (DCE). Participants having between 0.5 and 2 cm of clavicle excised had good outcomes and those requiring concomitant shoulder procedures had similarly good outcomes.

Ultrasound-guided injection and aspiration of small joints: techniques, pearls, and pitfalls

Ultrasound (US)-guided musculoskeletal intervention of small joints or joints other than the shoulder, elbow, hip, knee, and ankle can be technically challenging. Small joints produce a narrower landing zone for the needle and a smaller target that may be made even more inaccessible by bulky osteophytes. Sonographic (US) guidance offers important advantages including near-field visualization of the joint and soft tissues, ease of access, portability, ability to compare with the contralateral side, and lack of ionization radiation. This review article focuses on the performance of US-guided injections and aspirations involving small joints (joint capacity < 2 mL and/or typically evaluated or injected with a compact linear transducer). For each joint (temporomandibular, acromioclavicular, sternoclavicular, distal radioulnar, symphysis pubis, and joints of the digits of the hands and feet), a brief overview of the relevant anatomy, indications, procedural description, pearls and pitfalls will be highlighted. This article demonstrates the various approaches to diagnostic or therapeutic injection and aspiration of small joints with the aid of US images, cines and graphic illustrations, emphasizing joint positioning, anatomic landmarks, and needle trajectory for a safe and efficacious procedure. A brief review of available literature for each joint will also be provided.

Ultrasound-guided interventions of the upper extremity joints

Ultrasound guidance is valuable for performing precise joint interventions. Joint interventions may be requested for therapeutic and diagnostic pain injections, joint aspiration in the setting of suspected infection, or contrast injection for arthrography. In practice, interventions of the shoulder girdle, elbow, and hand/wrist joints may be performed without any imaging guidance. However, imaging guidance results in more accurate interventions and better patient outcomes than those performed by palpation alone. When compared to other modalities used for imaging guidance, ultrasound has many potential advantages. Radiologists should be prepared to perform ultrasound-guided upper extremity joint interventions utilizing recommended techniques to optimize clinical practice and patient outcomes. KEY POINTS: 1. Ultrasound-guided injections of the glenohumeral, acromioclavicular, sternoclavicular, elbow, and hand/wrist joints have higher accuracy than injections performed without imaging guidance. 2. Ultrasound-guided aspirations of upper extremity joints have advantages to fluoroscopic-guided aspirations because of the potential to identify effusions, soft tissue abscess, or bursitis. 3. Ultrasound-guided contrast injection prior to MR arthrography is as accurate as fluoroscopic-guided injection for upper extremity joints.

Ultrasound-guided sternoclavicular joint injection: technique and case series

Sternoclavicular joint pathology can be an uncommon cause of pain and discomfort around the neck and shoulder region. Typically, patients localize their pain deep to the joint and experience referred pain to the ipsilateral neck and shoulder; however, it often presents as a diffuse nonspecific pain. Given the paucity of this pathology and atypical presentation, the use of injections can be helpful to confirm the diagnosis of sternoclavicular arthropathy. Currently, most injections are done via computed tomography. Although this method is accurate, it exposes patients to radiation and burdens the patient with the requirement of multiple appointments. This case series outlines the use of ultrasound-guided sternoclavicular joint injections conducted in the clinic. The patients in this series underwent an ultrasound-guided injection in the affected sternoclavicular joint, which confirmed the diagnosis, and they were subsequently treated with resection arthroplasty. The use of ultrasound-guided injections of the sternoclavicular joint is a safe and accurate alternative diagnostic method, which saves the patient from harmful radiation and additional appointments. Limitations and efficacy may vary depending on skill and comfort level of the operator.

Upper Limb Interventions

Ultrasound has been reported to be a quick, cheap, and effective imaging modality to guide the interventional procedures in the musculoskeletal system. The use of ultrasound results in increased accuracy of needle placement associated with a reduction of complications. In the upper limb, ultrasound-guided procedures are applied to joints and soft tissues around the shoulder, elbow, wrist, and hand. This article reviews the clinical and technical aspects of the most common procedures performed in this anatomic area.

Clinical Applications of Ultrasonography in the Shoulder and Elbow

In the past 30 years, the use of ultrasonography in the field of orthopaedics has evolved. As ultrasonography has been refined, smaller machines with higher fidelity and better transducers have become available at a lower cost. Diagnostic and therapeutic applications of ultrasonography in the shoulder and elbow have expanded imaging options and provided alternatives to surgical management. Ultrasonography is a dynamic tool that affords immediate diagnostic assessment for clinical correlation and can be used for serial examinations and image guidance during therapeutic procedures. This imaging modality is highly reliable and accurate and may limit the need for costly imaging referrals, particularly in geographic areas where advanced imaging is not readily available. However, clinical expertise is paramount for ultrasonography, which is an operator-dependent modality. Ultrasonography is an effective educational resource; therefore, the curriculum in orthopaedic residency training programs should include education on this modality as the use of ultrasonography increases among orthopaedic surgeons.

Evolving Role of Ultrasound in Therapeutic Injections of the Upper Extremity

Ultrasound machines are creating more refined pictures and becoming more user-friendly and readily accessible. As a result, ultrasound is being increasingly used for therapeutic purposes. One example involves the use of ultrasound guidance in musculoskeletal interventional procedures, such as joint injections, tendon sheath injections, and peripheral nerve blocks. Technical considerations and therapeutic results have been described for multiple locations about the upper extremities, with varying levels of success. The implementation of ultrasound-guided injections in the orthopedist's clinic has therapeutic, financial, and provider role implications. Given these potential benefits, orthopedic providers, both in practice and residency, would benefit from increased exposure and education in ultrasound use. Ultrasound provides the benefit of real-time, dynamic imaging without the radiation exposure of fluoroscopy, and ultrasound-guided injections can be performed in the office, as opposed to the operating room, which is frequently required when using fluoroscopy. A basic knowledge of the principles and terms used in ultrasound is required. With these simple principles, a practitioner can review techniques for specific areas of the musculoskeletal system and begin using ultrasound to guide injections. Many locations for diagnostic and/or therapeutic injections in the upper extremities have improved accuracy and benefit with the use of ultrasound vs blind techniques, although a few have not been shown to have a significant difference in the literature. The educational and professional implications can be significant, but these potential benefits need to be carefully weighed against costs by each orthopedic practice.