Three-dimensional analysis versus goniometric measurement of total active elevation in normal subjects

Effect of Wii-habilitation on spatiotemporal parameters and upper limb function post-burn in children

BACKGROUND

Limb burns can cause different functional disorders that greatly impact one's quality of life.

AIM

The purpose of the current study was to compare the effect of Nintendo Wii sports intervention, and traditional treatment methods on spatiotemporal parameters and upper limb function post-burn in children.

METHODS

Thirty children their age ranging from 7-12 years, with dominant side upper limb burn participated in the study.Vicon3-D motion analysis system and Jebsen hand function test were used to evaluate spatiotemporal parameters (movement duration, peak velocity, and time to peak velocity percentage in three functional tasks) and upper limb function respectively. The children were randomly divided into study and control groups. The study group was rehabilitated with Wii training in addition to traditional therapy, while the control group rehabilitated only with the traditional therapy program. For the study group, the games selected were Wii Bowling, Baseball, and Tennis. Both groups were trained for 60 min daily, three times/week for six weeks. The outcomes were measured pre and post the treatment period.

RESULTS

The whole-time duration and peak velocity improved significantly in the study group across the hand to head task (p = 0.001, p < 0.001, respectively), hand to mouth (p = 0.001), and hand to shoulder (p < 0.001, p = 0.0018, respectively) compared with the control group. The time to peak velocity percentage was enhanced significantly in the study group (p < 0.001) than the control group in all three-measured tasks. Moreover, the Jebsen hand function test improved significantly (p < 0.001) in the study group than in the control group.

CONCLUSION

Wii-habilitation could be advised as an effective tool in the rehabilitation program of children with post-burn injuries.

Lower extremity range of motion and alignment: A reliability and concurrent validity study of goniometric and three-dimensional motion analysis measurement

Background

Knowing correlations between passive goniometric and dynamic three-dimensional motion analysis measurements of lower extremity range of motion and alignment would benefit knee injury risk assessment.

Purpose

To investigate reliability and concurrent validity of lower extremity assessment with goniometry and three-dimensional motion analysis.

Methods

Thirty-eight participants (76 limbs) were examined in standardized positions by two physiotherapists with simultaneous goniometric and three-dimensional motion analysis measurements of passive range of motion and alignment. Intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) and median differences were calculated.

Results

Hip rotation reliability, ICC 0.74–0.89 and validity 0.74–0.94. Tibial rotation reliability, ICC 0.24–0.75 and validity 0.08–0.61. Knee extension reliability, ICC 0.44–0.73 and validity 0.22–0.60. Knee valgus/varus reliability, ICC 0.36–0.68 and validity 0.25–0.62. Tibial torsion reliability, ICC 0.52–0.77 and validity 0.58–0.81. Ankle dorsiflexion reliability, ICC 0.12–0.73 and validity 0.51–0.83. Median differences in reliability and validity ranged from -2.0° to 3.0° and from -6.6° to 7.5° respectively.

Conclusion

Goniometric and three-dimensional motion analysis methods define the lower body segments differently making some degree of discrepancy in the measurements inevitable. Nevertheless, the variables chosen in this study are all strongly associated with anterior cruciate ligament rupture and some may prove useful to identify individuals at risk of knee injury during sport activities.

Study design

Cross-sectional laboratory study.

Reliability of a Smartphone Compared With an Inertial Sensor to Measure Shoulder Mobility: Cross-Sectional Study

BACKGROUND

The shoulder is one of the joints with the greatest mobility within the human body and its evaluation is complex. An assessment can be conducted using questionnaires or functional tests, and goniometry can complement the information obtained in this assessment. However, there are now validated devices that can provide more information on the realization of movement, such as inertial sensors. The cost of these devices is usually high and they are not available to all clinicians, but there are also inertial sensors that are implemented in mobile phones which are cheaper and widely available. Results from the inertial sensors integrated into mobile devices can have the same reliability as those from dedicated sensors.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to validate the use of the Nexus 4 smartphone as a measuring tool for the mobility of the humerus during shoulder movement compared with a dedicated InertiaCube3 (Intersense) sensor.

METHODS

A total of 43 subjects, 27 affected by shoulder pathologies and 16 asymptomatic, participated in the study. Shoulder flexion, abduction, and scaption were measured using an InertiaCube3 and a Nexus 4 smartphone, which were attached to the participants to record the results simultaneously. The interclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was calculated based on the 3 movements performed.

RESULTS

The smartphone reliably recorded the velocity values and simultaneously recorded them alongside the inertial sensor. The ICCs of the 3 gestures and for each of the axes of movement were analyzed with a 95% CI. In the abduction movement, the devices demonstrated excellent interclass reliability for the abduction humeral movement axis (Cronbach alpha=.98). The axis of abduction of the humeral showed excellent reliability for the movements of flexion (Cronbach alpha=.93) and scaption (Cronbach alpha=.98).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with the InertiaCube3, the Nexus 4 smartphone is a reliable and valid tool for recording the velocity produced in the shoulder.

Three-dimensional assessment of the asymptomatic and post-stroke shoulder: intra-rater test-retest reliability and within-subject repeatability of the palpation and digitization approach

Purpose: Altered three-dimensional (3D) joint kinematics can contribute to shoulder pathology, including post-stroke shoulder pain. Reliable assessment methods enable comparative studies between asymptomatic shoulders of healthy subjects and painful shoulders of post-stroke subjects, and could inform treatment planning for post-stroke shoulder pain. The study purpose was to establish intra-rater test-retest reliability and within-subject repeatability of a palpation/digitization protocol, which assesses 3D clavicular/scapular/humeral rotations, in asymptomatic and painful post-stroke shoulders. Methods: Repeated measurements of 3D clavicular/scapular/humeral joint/segment rotations were obtained using palpation/digitization in 32 asymptomatic and six painful post-stroke shoulders during four reaching postures (rest/flexion/abduction/external rotation). Intra-class correlation coefficients (ICCs), standard error of the measurement and 95% confidence intervals were calculated. Results: All ICC values indicated high to very high test-retest reliability (≥0.70), with lower reliability for scapular anterior/posterior tilt during external rotation in asymptomatic subjects, and scapular medial/lateral rotation, humeral horizontal abduction/adduction and axial rotation during abduction in post-stroke subjects. All standard error of measurement values demonstrated within-subject repeatability error ≤5° for all clavicular/scapular/humeral joint/segment rotations (asymptomatic ≤3.75°; post-stroke ≤5.0°), except for humeral axial rotation (asymptomatic ≤5°; post-stroke ≤15°). Conclusions: This noninvasive, clinically feasible palpation/digitization protocol was reliable and repeatable in asymptomatic shoulders, and in a smaller sample of painful post-stroke shoulders. Implications for Rehabilitation In the clinical setting, a reliable and repeatable noninvasive method for assessment of three-dimensional (3D) clavicular/scapular/humeral joint orientation and range of motion (ROM) is currently required. The established reliability and repeatability of this proposed palpation/digitization protocol will enable comparative 3D ROM studies between asymptomatic and post-stroke shoulders, which will further inform treatment planning. Intra-rater test-retest repeatability, which is measured by the standard error of the measure, indicates the range of error associated with a single test measure. Therefore, clinicians can use the standard error of the measure to determine the "true" differences between pre-treatment and post-treatment test scores.