Autologous distal clavicle versus autologous coracoid bone grafts for restoration of anterior-inferior glenoid bone loss: a biomechanical comparison

Arthroscopic Management of the Contact Athlete with Anterior Instability

Anterior glenohumeral instability is one of the most common injuries suffered from sport. Despite padding and conditioning, the shoulder joint remains particularly vulnerable to injury, especially in the setting of contact. The overall rate of anterior instability is reported to be 0.12 injuries per 1000 athlete exposures, although this is increased up to 0.40 to 0.51 in the contact athlete. Successful treatment requires consideration of restoring stability while minimizing loss of glenohumeral motion. Common treatment strategies involve addressing the pathology that results from anterior shoulder dislocation including labral detachment as well as bony defects to the humeral head and glenoid.

The Use of a Distal Radius Allograft for Severe Glenoid Bone Loss in the Setting of Revision Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Case Report

CASE

A 71-year-old female patient presented with severe glenoid bone loss and deformity after 2 subsequent failed arthroplasty procedures because of baseplate failures. The patients then underwent a conversion from reverse shoulder arthroplasty to hemiarthroplasty, while using a distal radius allograft to augment the deformed glenoid. At the 2-year follow-up, the patient reported minimal pain and satisfactory outcomes.

CONCLUSION

This case presents the distal radius as a potentially useful allograft option for augmenting severe glenoid bone loss in the setting of revision shoulder arthroplasty.

The Radius of Curvature of the Inferior Distal Clavicle Is Similar to That of the Glenoid in Both the Axial and Coronal Planes and Similar to the Inferior Coracoid

Purpose

The purposes of this study were to use computed tomography (CT) scans to compare the radius of curvature (ROC) of the inferior concave surface of the distal clavicle to the glenoid, determine graft dimensions, and compare the ROC of the congruent-arc distal clavicle autograft (DCA) to the congruent-arc Latarjet graft.

Methods

Patients who underwent bony glenoid reconstruction via a Laterjet procedure between January 2018 and January 2023 at a single institution were retrospectively identified. CT scans were used to measure the ROC of the glenoid on the axial and coronal sequences, measure the ROC of the distal clavicle on the sagittal oblique sequences, and determine the dimensions of the distal clavicle and coracoid graft.

Results

A total of 42 patients were included (Latarjet, n = 22; control, n = 20). The mean ROC of the inferior surface of the distal clavicle was not significantly different from the ROC of the glenoid in the coronal (P = .15) or axial planes (P = .65). The ROC of the coracoid when measured in the sagittal plane was not significantly different from the ROC of the distal clavicle (P = .25). The length, depth, and surface area of the coracoid in the congruent arc orientation were significantly larger than the distal clavicle (P < .005). Patients in the control group tended to have both a larger inferior clavicle ROC and a larger coracoid ROC compared to the Latarjet group (32.8 mm vs 29.6 mm, P < .0001; 31.8 mm vs 30.9 mm, P = .02).

Conclusions

The ROC of the inferior distal clavicle is similar to that of the glenoid in both the axial and coronal planes and similar to the inferior coracoid.

Clinical Relevance

CT analysis reveals that the congruent-arc DCA technique provides a robust graft with dimensions that are suitable for reconstruction of the anterior glenoid.

Acromion and Distal Clavicle Grafts for Arthroscopic Glenoid Reconstruction

BACKGROUND

We intended to determine if an acromion or distal clavicle bone graft could restore large glenoid defects using two novel, screw-free graft fixation techniques.

METHODS

Twenty-four sawbone shoulder models were divided into four groups (n = 6 per group) according to fixation technique and bone graft: (1) modified buckle-down technique with clavicle graft, (2) modified buckle-down technique with acromion graft, (3) cross-link technique with acromion graft, (4) cross-link technique with clavicle graft. Testing was performed sequentially in (1) intact models, (2) after creation of a 30% by-width glenoid defect and (3) after repair. The shoulder joint was translated anteriorly, and glenohumeral contact pressures and load were measured to quantify the biomechanical stability.

RESULTS

Maximum contact pressures were restored to 42-56% of intact glenoid using acromion and clavicle grafts with novel fixation techniques. Acromion grafts attained higher maximum contact pressures than clavicle grafts in all groups. Peak translational forces increased by 171-368% after all repairs.

CONCLUSIONS

This controlled laboratory study on sawbone models found that both the acromion and distal clavicle are suitable autologous bone graft options for treating large anterior glenoid defects, having appropriate dimensions and contours for reconstructing the glenoid arc. The modified buckle-down and cross-link techniques are two graft fixation techniques that restore stability to the shoulder joint upon repairing a large glenoid defect and are advantageous in being screw-free and simple to execute.

Arthroscopic Distal Clavicle Bone Block Technique for Anteroinferior Instability With Critical Bone Loss

Arthroscopic distal clavicle autograft represents a locally available source of autograft for bone block augmentation in patients with anterior shoulder instability with glenoid bone loss. Anatomic and biomechanical studies have supported distal clavicle autograft use as comparable to coracoid graft with regard to restoration of glenoid articular surface, with the theoretical advantage of minimizing complications associated with coracoid transfer procedures, such as neurologic injury and coracoid fracture. The current technique describes a modification of those previously described, including a mini-open approach for distal clavicle autograft harvest, orientation of the distal clavicle with the medial clavicle graft against the glenoid (congruent arc), an all-arthroscopic technique of graft passage, and graft placement and fixation using specialized drill guides and four suture buttons to reproducibly place and secure the graft with final capsulolabral advancement over the graft to render it extra-articular.

Distal Clavicle Autograft Versus Traditional and Congruent Arc Latarjet Procedures: A Comparison of Surface Area and Glenoid Apposition With 3-Dimensional Computed Tomography and 3-Dimensional Magnetic Resonance Imaging

BACKGROUND

Limited studies have compared graft-glenoid apposition and glenoid augmentation area between the Latarjet procedure and distal clavicle graft in glenohumeral stabilization. Additionally, preoperative planning is typically performed using computed tomography (CT), and few studies have used 3-dimensional (3D) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) reformations to assess graft dimensions.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was 2-fold: (1) to compare bony apposition, glenoid augmentation, and graft width among coracoid and distal clavicle bony augmentation techniques and (2) to determine the viability of 3D MRI to assess bone graft dimensions.

STUDY DESIGN

Controlled laboratory study.

METHODS

A total of 24 patients with recurrent glenohumeral instability and bone loss were included in this study. 3D CT and 3D MRI reformations were utilized to measure pertinent dimensions for 5 orientations of coracoid and distal clavicle autografts: (1) standard Latarjet procedure (SLJ), (2) congruent arc Latarjet procedure (CLJ), (3) distal clavicle attached by its posterior surface (DCP), (4) distal clavicle attached by its inferior surface (DCI), and (5) distal clavicle attached by its resected end (DCR). Glenoid augmentation was defined as the graft surface area contributing to the glenoid. Bone-on-bone apposition was defined as the graft-glenoid contact area for bone healing potential, and graft width was pertinent for fixation technique. Glenoid bone loss ranged from 0% to 34%. Paired t tests were used to compare graft sizes between patients and compare 3D CT versus 3D MRI measurements.

RESULTS

The CLJ had the largest graft surface area (mean, 318.41 ± 74.44 mm²), while the SLJ displayed the most bone-on-bone apposition (mean, 318.41 ± 74.44 mm²). The DCI had the largest graft width (mean, 20.62 ± 3.93 mm). Paired t tests revealed no significant differences between the Latarjet techniques, whereas distal clavicle grafts varied significantly with orientation. All 3D CT and 3D MRI measurements were within 1 mm of each other, and only 2 demonstrated a statistically significant difference (coracoid width: 13.03 vs 13.98 mm, respectively [P = .010]; distal clavicle thickness: 9.69 vs 10.77 mm, respectively [P = .002]). 3D CT and 3D MRI measurements demonstrated a strong positive correlation (r > 0.6 and P < .001 for all dimensions).

CONCLUSION

Glenoid augmentation, bony apposition, and graft width varied with coracoid or distal clavicle graft type and orientation. Differences between 3D CT and 3D MRI were small and likely not clinically significant.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

3D MRI is a viable method for preoperative planning and graft selection in glenoid bone loss.

Influence of Graft Positioning during the Latarjet Procedure on Shoulder Stability and Articular Contact Pressure: Computational Analysis of the Bone Block Effect

The Latarjet procedure is the most popular surgical procedure to treat anterior glenohumeral (GH) instability in the presence of large anterior glenoid bone defects. Even though the placement of the bone graft has a considerable influence on its efficacy, no clear indications exist for the best graft position. The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of the medial-lateral positioning of the bone graft on the contact mechanics and GH stability due to the bone block effect. Four finite element (FE) models of a GH joint, with a 20% glenoid bone defect, treated by the Latarjet procedure were developed. The FE models differed in the medial-lateral positioning of the bone graft, ranging from a flush position to a 4.5 mm lateral position with respect to the flush position. All graft placement options were evaluated for two separate shoulder positions. Anterior GH instability was simulated by translating the humeral head in the anterior direction, under a permanent compressive force, until the peak translation force was reached. Joint stability was computed as the ratio between the shear and the compressive components of the force. The lateralization of the bone graft increased GH stability due to the bone block effect after a 3 mm lateralization with respect to the flush position. The increase in GH stability was associated with a concerning increase in peak contact pressure due to the incongruous contact between the articulating surfaces. The sensitivity of the contact pressures to the medial-lateral positioning of the bone graft suggests a trade-off between GH stability due to the bone block effect and the risk of osteoarthritis, especially considering that an accurate and consistent placement of the bone graft is difficult in vivo.

Distal Clavicle Autograft Fixed with Buttons for the Management of Shoulder Instability with Glenoid Defect: A Case Report

CASE

In this case report, we presented the case of a 39-year-old male lawyer who presented to our tertiary care clinic with recurrent instability of his right shoulder and significant glenoid bone loss. This patient was treated with arthroscopic glenoid bone augmentation with his distal clavicle fixed with arthroscopic suture buttons.

CONCLUSION

Use of a distal clavicle autograft with arthroscopic fixation using buttons is a novel and promising solution for the management of patients with shoulder instability and associated glenoid bone loss.

A review of bone grafting techniques for glenoid reconstruction

BACKGROUND

Traumatic anterior shoulder dislocations can cause bony defects of the anterior glenoid rim and are often associated with recurrent shoulder instability. For large glenoid defects of 20-30% without a mobile bony fragment, glenoid reconstruction with bone grafts is often recommended. This review describes two broad categories of glenoid reconstruction procedures found in literature: coracoid transfers involving the Bristow and Latarjet procedures, and free bone grafting techniques.

METHODS

An electronic search of MEDLINE and PubMed was conducted to find original articles that described glenoid reconstruction techniques or modifications to existing techniques.

RESULTS

Coracoid transfers involve the Bristow and Latarjet procedures. Modifications to these procedures such as arthroscopic execution, method of graft attachment and orientation have been described. Free bone grafts have been obtained from the iliac crest, distal tibia, acromion, distal clavicle and femoral condyle.

CONCLUSION

Both coracoid transfers and free bone grafting procedures are options for reconstructing large bony defects of the anterior glenoid rim and have had similar clinical outcomes. Free bone grafts may offer greater flexibility in graft shaping and choice of graft size depending on the bone stock chosen. Novel developments tend towards minimising invasiveness using arthroscopic approaches and examining alternative non-rigid graft fixation techniques.

Arthroscopic Distal Clavicular Autograft for Congruent Glenoid Reconstruction

Arthroscopic distal clavicular autograft (DCA) is effective in shoulder instability with glenoid bone loss. The original technique uses an osteochondral autograft, fixed with screws or suture anchors. We developed a modified procedure called "congruent arc DCA" characterized by (1) use of drilling guides to optimize graft positioning and make the all-arthroscopic procedure safer and reproducible; (2) rotation of the DCA of 90° to reach a congruent arc with its undersurface; (3) fixation of the graft with cortical buttons to simplify its intra-articular passage, avoid hardware problems, and facilitate possible revision surgery; and (4) intraoperative use of a suture tensioner to achieve satisfactory compression of the graft and increase its consolidation.

Coronoid process reconstruction with a distal clavicle autograft: an in silico analysis of fitting accuracy

BACKGROUND

The coronoid process plays a vital role in preserving elbow stability. In cases of acute or chronic deficiency of the coronoid process, reconstruction is warranted to restore stability and to avoid early joint degeneration. The distal clavicle might be a useful osteochondral autograft for coronoid reconstruction with low donor-site morbidity. This study evaluated the fitting accuracy of the distal clavicle as an autograft for coronoid process reconstruction.

METHODS

One hundred upper-extremity computed tomography scans of 85 body donors were available for this study (mean age, 69 ± 17 years; 46 male and 39 female donors; 15 bilateral specimens). Standardized 40% transverse defects of the coronoid process were digitally created; the distal clavicles were digitally harvested and placed onto the defects by a best-fit technique in 2 different orientations using commercially available software: (1) with the superior aspect of the articular surface of the graft oriented toward the coronoid tip and (2) with the inferior aspect of the articular surface of the graft oriented toward the coronoid tip. The fitting accuracy of the grafts to the native coronoid process was evaluated from lateral to medial using custom code.

RESULTS

Regardless of the orientation of the graft, the distal clavicle provided a good fit in the central portion of the coronoid process. In the lateral and medial aspects of the defect, however, the fitting accuracy of the graft declined significantly (P ≤ .044). No significant differences were observed between ipsilateral and contralateral grafts (P ≥ .199). The intrarater reliability was excellent.

CONCLUSION

The results of this study suggest that a distal clavicle autograft may be suitable to replace a transverse defect of the coronoid process; however, it may not fully reconstruct the anteromedial and anterolateral aspects of the coronoid.

Distal clavicle autograft for anterior-inferior glenoid augmentation: A comparative cadaveric anatomic study

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study was to anatomically compare distal clavicle and coracoid autografts and their potential to augment anterior-inferior glenoid bone loss.

METHODS

Ten millimeters of distal clavicle and 20 mm of coracoid were harvested bilaterally from 32 cadavers. Length, weight, and height were measured and surface area and density were calculated. For each graft, ipsilateral measurements were compared and the ability to restore corresponding glenoid bone loss was calculated.

RESULTS

Distal clavicle grafts were larger than coracoid grafts with respect to length (22.3 mm versus 17.7 mm; p < 0.001), height (12.49 mm versus 9.65 mm; p < 0.001), mass (2.72 g versus 2.45 g; p = 0.0437), and volume (2.36 cm³ versus 1.96 cm³; p = 0.002). Coracoid grafts had larger widths (14.56 mm versus 10.52 mm; p < 0.001) and greater density (1.24 g/cm³ versus 1.18 g/cm³; p < 0.001). Distal clavicle surface area was greater on both the articular (2.93 cm² versus 1.5 cm²; p < 0.001) and superior surfaces (2.76 cm² versus 1.5 cm²; p < 0.001) when compared to lateral coracoid surface area.

DISCUSSION

Distal clavicle grafts were larger and restored larger bony defects but had greater variability and lower density than coracoid grafts. Clinical studies are needed to compare these graft options.

Shoulder biomechanics in normal and selected pathological conditions

The stability of the glenohumeral joint depends on soft tissue stabilizers, bone morphology and dynamic stabilizers such as the rotator cuff and long head of the biceps tendon. Shoulder stabilization techniques include anatomic procedures such as repair of the labrum or restoration of bone loss, but also non-anatomic options such as remplissage or tendon transfers.

Rotator cuff repair should restore the cuff anatomy, reattach the rotator cable and respect the coracoacromial arch whenever possible. Tendon transfer, superior capsular reconstruction or balloon implantation have been proposed for irreparable lesions.

Shoulder rehabilitation should focus on restoring balanced glenohumeral and scapular force couples in order to avoid an upward migration of the humeral head and secondary cuff impingement. The primary goal of cuff repair is to be as anatomic as possible and to create a biomechanically favourable environment for tendon healing.

Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2020;5:508-518. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.5.200006

[Biomechanical comparative analysis of screw fixation and cortical endo-button fixation in Latarjet procedure for anterior dislocation of shoulder joint]

OBJECTIVE

To clarify the value of the cortical endo-button as an internal fixator in Latarjet procedure through biomechanical analysis.

METHODS

Ten pairs of shoulder joints from 6-7 months old male pigs were selected. Each pair was randomly divided into screw group and endo-button group. A 25% glenoid defect model was created, and the porcine infraspinatus tendon and its associated bone were used to simulate conjoint tendon and coracoid process in human body. The bone grafts were fixed with two 3.5 mm screws and double cortical endo-buttons with high-strength sutures in screw group and endo-button group, respectively. The prepared glenoid defect model was fixed on a biomechanical test bench and optical markers were fixed on the glenoid and the bone block, respectively. Then fatigue test was performed to observe whether the graft or internal fixator would failed. During the test, the standard deviations of the relative displacement between the graft and the glenoid of two groups were measured by optical motion measure system for comparison. Finally the maximum failure load comparison was conducted and the maximum failure loads of the two groups were measured and compared.

RESULTS

There was no tendon tear, bone fracture, and other graft or internal fixation failure in the two groups during the fatigue test. The standard deviation of the relative displacement of the screw group was (0.007 87±0.001 44) mm, and that of the endo-button group was (0.034 88±0.011 10) mm, showing significant difference between the two groups ( t=7.682, P=0.000). The maximum failure load was (265±39) N in screw group and (275±52) N in endo-button group, showing no significant difference between the two groups ( t=1.386, P=0.199). There were 3 ways of failure: rupture at bone graft's tunnel (6/10 from screw group, 3/10 from endo-button group), tendon tear at the cramp (2/10 from screw group, 2/10 from endo-button group), and tendon tear at the internal fixator interface (2/10 from screw group, 5/10 from endo-button group), showing no significant difference between the two groups ( P=0.395).

CONCLUSION

Although the endo-button fixation fails to achieve the same strong fixation stability as the screw fixation, its fixation stability can achieve the clinical requirements. The two fixation methods can provide similar fixation strength when being used in Latarjet procedure.

How to handle minor and major bone loss in the shoulder? Current concepts

Anterior shoulder instability is a significant problem in orthopaedic surgery. It carries a heavy burden on quality of life, especially in young, active patients. Surgical treatment is therefore often carried out in this population. Several strategies can effectively address this issue. Yet, the consensus is lacking on the parameters which favour one technique over another, especially when bone loss is present. This is because of the complex, dynamic interplay between bone loss on the humeral side (ie, Hill-Sachs lesion) and glenoid bone loss, which is a common occurrence and defined as ‘bipolar’. There is an ongoing debate over the percentage of glenoid bone loss warranting bone block procedures: 13.5–15% is an indicator for such procedures (ie, Latarjet), although this value is still considered controversial and not uniformly accepted. A multitude of other factors (ie, age, sex, level of activity and so on) come into play alongside bipolar bone loss and the weight of each factor has yet to be fully elucidated. Also, refining the algorithm for the right procedure in the right patients will reduce the number of side effects stemming from initial, suboptimal treatment choice. Knowing how to manage previous surgical treatment failure is also key for the treating orthopaedic surgeon, who must be able to address the root cause of failure and react accordingly and effectively. This paper analyses key factors in treatment choice, the current stance of the literature on varying degrees of bone loss and choices on surgical treatment failure, lack of evidence and need for future research.

Analysis of the disc pressure of the upper thoracic spine using pressure-sensitive film: an experimental study in porcine model-implications for scoliosis progression

There has been few studies focusing on the disc pressure of the upper thoracic spine and it still lacks the quantitative pressure measurement of each spinal disc segment. The aim of this study was to study the pressure changes of intervertebral disc in porcine upper thoracic spine using pressure-sensitive film. Twelve porcine thoracic motion segments were harvested and successively loaded with vertical loads of 100 N, 150 N, and 200 N during 5° of anterior flexion, 5° of posterior extension and 5° of lateral bending. The resulting pressure values were measured. During anterior flexion, the anterior annulus of all segments at all loads showed higher mean pressure values than those during vertical compression, whereas the posterior annulus did not show higher mean values. During posterior extension, the anterior annulus of all segments showed lower mean pressure values than those during vertical compression, whereas the posterior annulus did not show lower mean pressure values. During lateral bending, the annulus of all segments showed higher mean pressure values than those during vertical compression. The posterior thoracic vertebra plays an important role in the motion of the upper thoracic vertebral segment and pressure distribution. During lateral bending, the concave side pressure of the annulus increases obviously, suggesting that asymmetrical force is a contributory factor for scoliosis progression.

Distal Clavicular Osteochondral Autograft Augmentation for Glenoid Bone Loss: A Comparison of Radius of Restoration Versus Latarjet Graft

BACKGROUND

Bone loss in shoulder instability is a well-recognized cause of failure after stabilization surgery. Many approaches have been described to address glenoid bone loss, including coracoid transfer. This transfer can be technically difficult and has been associated with high complication rates. An ideal alternative to coracoid transfer would be an autologous source of fresh osteochondral graft with enough surface area to replace significant glenoid bone loss. The distal clavicle potentially provides such a graft source that is readily available and low-cost.

PURPOSE

To evaluate distal clavicular autograft reconstruction for instability-related glenoid bone loss, specifically comparing the width of the clavicular autograft with the width of an ipsilateral coracoid graft as prepared for a Latarjet procedure. Further, we sought to compare the articular cartilage thickness of the distal clavicle graft with that of the native glenoid.

STUDY DESIGN

Controlled laboratory study.

METHODS

Twenty-seven fresh-frozen cadaver specimens were dissected, and an open distal clavicle excision was performed. The coracoid process in each specimen was prepared as has been described for a classic Latarjet coracoid transfer. In each specimen, the distal clavicle graft was compared with the coracoid graft for size and potential of glenoid articular radius of restoration. The distal clavicle graft was also compared with the native glenoid for cartilage thickness.

RESULTS

In all specimens, the distal clavicle grafts provided a greater radius of glenoid restoration than the coracoid grafts ( P < .0001). On average, the clavicular graft was able to reconstruct 44% of the glenoid diameter, compared with 33% for the coracoid graft ( P < .0001). The articular cartilage of the glenoid was significantly thicker (1.4 mm thicker, P < .0001) than that of the distal clavicular autograft (average ± SD, 3.5 ± 0.6 mm vs 2.1 ± 0.8 mm, respectively). When specimens with osteoarthritis were excluded, this difference decreased to 0.97 mm when compared with the clavicular cartilage ( P = .0026).

CONCLUSION

The distal clavicle autograft can restore a significantly greater glenoid bone deficit than the Latarjet procedure and has the additional benefit of restoring articular cartilage to the glenoid. The articular cartilage thickness of the distal clavicle is within 1.4 mm of that of the native glenoid.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

The distal clavicular autograft may be a suitable option for reconstruction of instability-related glenoid bone loss. This graft provides a structural osteochondral autograft with a broader radius of reconstruction than that of a coracoid graft, is locally available, has minimal donor site morbidity, is anatomic, and provides articular cartilage.

Management of Glenoid Bone Loss with Anterior Shoulder Instability: Indications and Outcomes

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Glenoid Bone Loss is a commonly encountered problem in anterior shoulder instability. In this article, we review current techniques for diagnosis, indications and management of glenoid bone loss.

RECENT FINDINGS

Multiple bone grafting techniques are available depending on the glenoid defect size including the coracoid, distal clavicle, iliac crest, and allograft distal tibia. Advancement in imaging methods allows for more accurate quantification of bone loss. Indications and techniques are continuing to evolve, and emerging evidence suggests that smaller degrees of bone loss "subcritical" may be best treated with bone grafting. Future directions for innovation and investigation include improved arthroscopic techniques and a refinement of indications for the type of bone grafts and when to indicate a patient of arthroscopic repair versus glenoid bone grafting for smaller degrees of bone loss to ensure successful outcome.