Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty in wheelchair-dependent patients

Reverse total shoulder replacement for patients with "weight-bearing" shoulders

BACKGROUND

Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) has gained popularity in recent years and is indicated for a wide variety of shoulder pathologies. However, use of rTSA in patients with "weight-bearing" shoulders that support wheelchair use or crutches has higher risk. The aim of this study was to assess the results of rTSA in such patients.

METHODS

Between 2005 and 2014, 24 patients (30 shoulders) with weight-bearing shoulders were treated with rTSA at our unit. Patients had cuff arthropathy (n=21), rheumatoid arthritis (n=3), osteoarthritis (n=1), acute fracture (n=3), or fracture sequela (n=2). Postoperatively, patients were advised not to push themselves up and out of their wheelchair for 6 weeks. This study was performed in 2016, and 21 patients (27 shoulders) were available for a mean follow-up of 5.6 years (range, 2-10 years). The mean age at surgery was 78 years (range, 54-90 years).

RESULTS

Constant-Murley score improved from 9.4 preoperatively to 59.8 at the final follow-up (P=0.001). Pain score improved from 2/15 to 13.8/15 (P=0.001). Patient satisfaction (Subjective Shoulder Value) improved from 0.6/10 to 8.7/10 (P=0.001). Significant improvement in mean range of motion from 46° to 130° of elevation, 14° to 35° of external rotation, and 29° to 78° internal rotation was recorded (P=0.001). Final mean Activities of Daily Living External and Internal Rotation was 32.4/36. Only three patients showed Sirveaux-Nerot grade-1 (10%) glenoid notching and three grade 2 (10%).

CONCLUSIONS

rTSA can be used for treatment of patients with weight-bearing shoulders. Such patients reported pain free movement, resumed daily activities, and high satisfaction rates. Level of evidence: IV.

Shoulder arthroplasty in the upper extremity weight-bearing patient: a systematic review of clinical outcomes and complications

BACKGROUND

Patients who rely on their upper extremities for ambulation, or upper extremity ambulators (UEAs), place considerable stress on their shoulders through the use of assistive devices like walkers, crutches, canes, and wheelchairs. It has been postulated that UEAs may be at increased risk for complications following shoulder arthroplasty. This study aimed to systematically review the literature related to (1) patient-reported outcomes measures (PROMs), (2) functional outcomes, and (3) complications in UEAs who undergo shoulder arthroplasty.

METHODS

A systematic review of the PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane databases was performed to identify studies reporting clinical outcomes of shoulder arthroplasty in UEAs. Patient demographics, clinical characteristics, patient-reported outcomes measures, radiographic outcomes, and postoperative range of motion were collected and compared to control patients (ie bipedal ambulators) from the constituent studies.

RESULTS

A total of eight studies evaluating 248 UEA cases and 206 control cases were included for review. Ambulatory assistive devices utilized by UEAs included walkers (39%), wheelchairs (38%), canes (22%), and a crutch (<1%). Among UEA cases, 197 (79%) reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA), 37 (15%) anatomic TSA, and 14 (6%) hemiarthroplasty were performed. Overall, patients exhibited significant improvements in mean American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores, Constant-Murley scores, Simple Shoulder Test scores, and Visual Analog Scale scores postoperatively. Among 3 studies that included comparison with control groups of bipedal ambulators, no significant differences in outcomes were identified. The overall clinical complication rate was 17% for UEAs compared to 9.1% for controls. The rate of revision surgery was 7.7% for UEAs and 4.9% for bipedal ambulators.

CONCLUSIONS

UEAs experience satisfactory pain relief, functional improvements, and good subjective outcomes following shoulder arthroplasty. However, complication and revision rates are higher compared to those for bipedal ambulators, and the majority of UEAs undergo reverse shoulder arthroplasty compared to anatomic TSA.

Initial clinical experience with a predictive clinical decision support tool for anatomic and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty

PURPOSE

Clinical decision support tools (CDSTs) are software that generate patient-specific assessments that can be used to better inform healthcare provider decision making. Machine learning (ML)-based CDSTs have recently been developed for anatomic (aTSA) and reverse (rTSA) total shoulder arthroplasty to facilitate more data-driven, evidence-based decision making. Using this shoulder CDST as an example, this external validation study provides an overview of how ML-based algorithms are developed and discusses the limitations of these tools.

METHODS

An external validation for a novel CDST was conducted on 243 patients (120F/123M) who received a personalized prediction prior to surgery and had short-term clinical follow-up from 3 months to 2 years after primary aTSA (n = 43) or rTSA (n = 200). The outcome score and active range of motion predictions were compared to each patient's actual result at each timepoint, with the accuracy quantified by the mean absolute error (MAE).

RESULTS

The results of this external validation demonstrate the CDST accuracy to be similar (within 10%) or better than the MAEs from the published internal validation. A few predictive models were observed to have substantially lower MAEs than the internal validation, specifically, Constant (31.6% better), active abduction (22.5% better), global shoulder function (20.0% better), active external rotation (19.0% better), and active forward elevation (16.2% better), which is encouraging; however, the sample size was small.

CONCLUSION

A greater understanding of the limitations of ML-based CDSTs will facilitate more responsible use and build trust and confidence, potentially leading to greater adoption. As CDSTs evolve, we anticipate greater shared decision making between the patient and surgeon with the aim of achieving even better outcomes and greater levels of patient satisfaction.

Perioperative complications and outcomes in patients with paraplegia undergoing rotator cuff repair

Background

Patients with paraplegia often experience chronic shoulder pain due to overuse. We sought to determine if these patients have an increased prevalence of perioperative complications and higher rates of re-admissions and rotator cuff re-tears relative to able-bodied controls following rotator cuff repair (RCR).

Methods

We queried the NRD (2011-2018) to identify all patients undergoing primary RCR (n = 34,451) and identified cohorts of matched paraplegic and non-paraplegic patients (n = 194 each). We compared demographic factors, comorbidity profiles, perioperative complication rates, length of stay, revision rates, and re-admission rates between the two groups.

Results

Patients with paraplegia had lower rates of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (p = 0.02), hypertension (p = 0.007), congestive heart failure (p = 0.027), obesity (p < 0.001), and prior myocardial infarction (p = 0.01). Additionally, patients with paraplegia experienced higher rates of urinary tract infections (11.9% vs. 2.1%, p < 0.001), lower rates of acute respiratory distress syndrome (0% vs. 3.1%, p = 0.041), and had a longer length of stay (4-days vs. 1-day, p < 0.001). Revision rates were similar for the two groups.

Conclusions

Compared to matched controls, patients with paraplegia were found to have similar demographic characteristics, less comorbidities, similar perioperative complication rates, and similar revision rates. These findings address a gap in the literature regarding surgical management of shoulder pain in patients with paraplegia by providing a matched comparison with a large sample size.

Reverse shoulder arthroplasty in upper extremity ambulators: a matched-cohort analysis

BACKGROUND

Upper extremity ambulators (UEAs) who require prolonged use of assistive devices for mobility have a high incidence of shoulder pathology secondary to increased stress across the shoulder joint with upper extremity weight-bearing. Reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) for rotator cuff arthropathy has historically been associated with increased complications in UEA, but more recent studies have shown more promising outcomes. The objective of this study is to evaluate clinical outcomes and complication rates between these 2 groups to define the relative risk of RSA in the UEA population and identify opportunities to improve treatment outcomes.

METHODS

An institutional review board-approved retrospective chart review was performed in patients who underwent RSA at our institution by the senior author from 2004 to 2019. UEAs were defined as patients who used regular upper extremity assistive devices for community ambulation before initial consultation for the surgical extremity. Pre- and postoperative range of motion, visual analog scale scores, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores, Constant-Murley scores, and Simple Shoulder Test scores were measured at defined intervals. Complications including infection, instability, and need for revision surgery were also compared. All patients were followed for a minimum of 2 years postoperatively.

RESULTS

A total of 159 RSA procedures (70 UEAs, 89 controls) were performed during the study period. On average, UEA patients had more preoperative pain and less shoulder function than controls, with statistically significant differences in visual analog scores (6.897 vs. 5.532, P = .0010) and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores (33.50 vs. 40.20, P = .0290), respectively. Despite the lower baseline values, UEA patients experienced excellent postoperative improvement, leading to similar postoperative pain and shoulder function except for a lower average forward flexion in the UEA group (127° vs. 135°, P = .0354). Notching and complication rates were also similar between the 2 groups, with notching rates of 59% and 50% and complication rates of 14.3% and 13.5% in the UEA and control groups, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

RSA in the UEA population can achieve similar pain and functional outcomes as compared with age-matched controls without a significant increase in complication rates; however, further studies are required to assess long-term comparative outcomes in this challenging patient population.

Identification of Independent Predictors of Increased 90-Day Complication and Revision Rates Following Total Elbow Arthroplasty

Introduction

Total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) is an increasingly popular surgical option for many debilitating conditions of the elbow. There currently exists a paucity of literature regarding patient and hospital factors that lead to inferior outcomes following TEA. The purpose of this study is to identify independent predictors of increased complication and revision rates following TEA.

Methods

The National Readmissions Database (NRD) was queried from 2011 to 2018 to identify all cases of TEA (n = 8932). Relevant patient demographic factors, comorbidities, and hospital characteristics were identified and run in a univariate binomial logistic regression model. All significant variables were included in a multivariate binomial logistic regression model for data analysis.

Results

Independent predictors of increased complication rates included age, female sex, Medicare and Medicaid payer status, medium bed-sized center, and 18 of 34 medical comorbidities (all P < .05). Independent predictors of increased revision rates included medium bed-sized centers, non-teaching hospital status, chronic pulmonary disease, depression, and pulmonary circulatory disorders (all P < .05).

Conclusion

This study identified several patient and hospital characteristics that are independently associated with both increased complication and revision rates following TEA. This information can aid orthopedic surgeons during shared decision making when considering TEA in patients.

Level of Evidence

Level III, retrospective cohort study.

The clinical outcome of physiotherapy after reversed shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review

PURPOSE

The purpose of this systematic review was to analyze the current literature on the clinical outcomes of physiotherapy (PT) program after reversed total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) and to summarize the improvements in this population.

METHODS

A search was performed in four databases (MEDLINE, Embase, PubMed, Google Scholar) from its inception to 30 April 2020. Data were extracted to describe the study design and rehab programs. The quality of evidence was assessed as high, moderate, and low-level according to the Evaluation of Quality of an Intervention Study critical appraisal criteria.

RESULTS

There were 22 eligible studies including two randomized controlled trials, four prospective cohort studies, 10 retrospective reviews, five case-series, and one case-control study, with the sample sizes ranging from 9 to 474 patients followed for 1-10 years. All studies indicated substantial improvement in patients after PT program in terms of functional outcomes and forward flexion.

CONCLUSIONS

High-quality RCTs are required to provide more conclusive results. We identified substantial variation in the post-operative PT programs except for the progressive mobilization strategy and the common management following surgery to increase the soft tissue healing within 4-6 weeks.Implications for RehabilitationThe reverse shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) has been widely utilized for patients with rotator cuff arthropathy, primary arthritis, and proximal fractures.A successful outcome of rTSA is not only depending on the surgical management, but also depended on physiotherapy (PT) programs.Our systematic review concluded that a 12-week PT program starting with immobilization for 4-6 weeks, followed by 3-4 phases PT exercises including PROM, AAROM, AROM, and strength training was recommended as common management for patients received rTSA.Due to the huge variation in the included studies, the evidence of PT protocol in our study was not sufficient to summarize the better clinical practice suggestions regarding rTSA rehabilitation.

Manual wheelchair use leads to a series of failed shoulder replacements: A case report and literature review

Manual wheelchair users place high stress on their shoulders. We describe a 69-year-old male who developed end-stage shoulder osteoarthritis from chronic manual wheelchair (MW) use. Three prosthetic total shoulder replacements failed, reflecting his refusal to transition to an electric wheelchair. MW use must be avoided in some of these patients.

Arthroplasty for weight-bearing shoulders

INTRODUCTION

Repeated transfers and wheelchair propulsion in patients with a neurological deficit of the lower limbs overloads the upper limbs mechanically, particularly the shoulders, which become weight-bearing. Under these conditions, arthroplasty implants are subjected to large stresses, even though this indication is controversial in such a context. We hypothesized that joint replacement in weight-bearing shoulders will relieve pain and improve range of motion, with a positive impact on function and autonomy, without increasing the complication rate relative to the able-bodied population.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study involved 13 implants in 11 patients (4 total shoulder arthroplasty, 4 hemi-arthroplasty and 3 reverse shoulder arthroplasty) who had a mean follow-up of 33.7 ± 27 months (12-85 months). The clinical assessment included active and passive range of motion, pain, Constant score, and the Wheelchair User's Shoulder Pain Index (WUSPI). Radiographs were evaluated to look for signs of loosening and scapular notching. The patients' autonomy was evaluated through the number of transfers, means of locomotion (manual or electric wheelchair) and the functional independence measure (FIM). Two subgroups were defined based on the initial pathology: neurological shoulder or functional shoulder.

RESULTS

The 11 patients had a mean age of 64±19 years (23-85 years) and were all long-term wheelchair users (electrical or mechanical). The pain level on VAS decreased from 8±3 preoperatively to 4±2 postoperatively (p=0.003). The mean Constant score increased 90% from 22±11 preoperatively to 42±23 postoperatively (p=0.008). The WUSPI score decreased by 73% from 80±30 to 21±15 (p=0.001). The range of motion improved in the subgroup of patients with functional shoulders but not in the subgroup of patients with neurological shoulders. The means of locomotion was altered in five patients (63%) by the acquisition of an electric wheelchair, but with no significant change in the number of daily transfers. There were no radiographic signs of implant loosening at the final assessment. Two implants had to be revised: one anatomical prosthesis was converted to a reverse configuration because of a secondary rotator cuff rupture; one case of early infection required a two-stage implant change.

DISCUSSION

Joint replacement in weight-bearing shoulders is an effective medium-term solution for cuff tear arthropathy and glenohumeral OA, mainly for addressing pain, with slight improvements in range of motion, depending on the initial pathology. This intervention requires lifestyle adaptations such as changes in daily transfer practices and means of locomotion.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV, retrospective study.

Weight-bearing shoulder and rotator cuff tear

Two percent of the general population are wheelchair-dependent. The shoulder takes on the weight-bearing locomotor function, and tends with age to develop degenerative pathologies, notably in the rotator cuff. The association between weight-bearing shoulder and rotator cuff tear raises several questions: what are the mechanisms by which wheelchair propulsion and transfer overload the shoulder, and what specificities do the lesions display? They occur in younger patients than in the rest of the population, after about 15 years' fairly constant wheelchair use. As well as the classical supraspinatus damage, an anterior cuff extension is the most frequent case. Is there a particular clinical presentation of cuff tear in this population? As the shoulder cannot be functionally protected, pain is constant and asymptomatic cuff tear is rare. Any pain after 12 years' wheelchair use requires morphologic exploration. How does treatment strategy differ for the weight-bearing shoulder? More than the classic quest for compensation, in the weight-bearing shoulder, the rotator cuff should be protected against any local aggression by systematic surgical recalibration of the subacromial space, and all lesions should be repaired, to avoid extension. Are functional results to be expected to be poorer in this population? On condition that the suture is protected by postponing any transfer beyond 4 months and that the shoulder is protected on a daily basis, analytic results and healing rates are comparable to those in the general population. However, general complications and skin complications are more frequent and require postoperative care in a specialized center.

Dislocation after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty using contemporary medialized modular systems. Can we still consider it such a frequent complication?

INTRODUCTION

Improvement in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) prosthesis and technique has reduced the initially high complication and revision rates associated with this implant. However, instability continues to be a leading cause of reoperation after RTSA, being related in previous studies with medialized designs. The aim of this study was to determine the dislocation rate with the employment of two medialized modular systems of RTSA in our institution.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective review of two different modular systems of RTSA (SMR Modular Shoulder System and Delta XTEND Reverse Shoulder) was performed between 2009 and 2017 with a minimum 3-year follow-up. Baseline demographic, clinical (Constant, ASES and ROM), and radiographic data were collected. Characteristics of postoperative instability cases were also evaluated.

RESULTS

237 primary RTSA (41% SMR/59% Delta) and 34 revision RTSA (44% SMR/56% Delta) with a mean follow-up of 75.6 ± 5.2 months (79.2 SMR/86.3 Delta, p = .586) were included in the present study. Indications for primary RTSA were osteoarthritis, rotator cuff tear arthropathy and massive irreparable rotator cuff tear (64%), acute fracture (32%), and fracture sequelae (4%). Subscapularis tendon was always repaired in degenerative pathology and tuberosities reattached in traumatic cases. The mean age of the global series was 76.5 ± 5.3 years (75.8 SMR/78.6 Delta, p = .104) with a mean Constant/ASES score at final follow-up of 68.5 ± 4.3/72.9 ± 20.3 (71/68 SMR and 69/74 Delta, p = .653 and .642). Only 2 patients (one acute fracture and one fracture sequelae) suffered an early postoperative anterior dislocation (before 3 months) which represents a rate of .84% in primary cases and .73% including revision surgery. Closed reduction manoeuvres were not successful, and both patients required revision surgery. At the end follow-up, both were stable and had no further dislocations.

CONCLUSION

The dislocation rate after RTSA with the employment of two contemporary modular systems with a medialized centre of rotation is extremely low, especially when compared with the previously published series with the original Grammont design. Acute fracture and fracture sequelae were the main diagnoses associated with this instability. The reasons for the low dislocation rate are multifactorial, but the improvement in the baseplate position according to the more recent standards of "ideal position" and technical aspects such as subscapularis repair or tuberosity reattachment in fractures probably play an important role in this aspect.

Shoulder arthroplasty in dwarfism: A case report of pseudoachondroplasia with 17-year follow-up

The purpose of this case report is to report the long-term outcome following shoulder hemiarthroplasty in a patient with dwarfism. A 60-year old female with pseudoachondroplasia dwarfism presented 17 years post-operative with a Subjective Shoulder Value of 90% and minimal pain. Custom designed implants were critical for surgical success. Preoperative planning with a CT scan was important in assessing glenoid dysplasia and determining the feasibility of glenoid resurfacing. The emergence of 3D CT virtual preoperative planning tools can further assist in the recognition of deformity to determine if custom designed implants are needed. Shoulder arthroplasty in dwarfism can lead to excellent long-term outcomes.

Rehabilitation After Anatomic and Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Critical Analysis Review

Postoperative rehabilitation is believed to be essential in optimizing clinical outcome and function following shoulder arthroplasty. Despite this long-held notion, there is a paucity of high-quality evidence to guide rehabilitation protocols and practice. For patients undergoing anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (ATSA), there are insufficient comparative data regarding type or duration of sling utilization. Based on current evidence, there is no appreciable benefit to early motion compared with a delayed-motion protocol following ATSA. There is insufficient literature to support the use of formal physical therapy over a physician-directed program following ATSA. At the present time, no high-quality evidence exists to guide the postoperative rehabilitation of patients undergoing reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA). Prospective randomized controlled trials evaluating postoperative management and rehabilitation following ATSA and RTSA are needed to guide best practices and optimize clinical outcomes.

Lower-extremity total joint arthroplasty in shoulder arthroplasty patients: does the order of the lower-extremity total joint arthroplasty matter?

BACKGROUND

As total joint arthroplasty (TJA) utilization increases, arthroplasties of multiple joints in a patient are more common. An understanding of the success of shoulder arthroplasty patients also requiring a lower-extremity (hip or knee) TJA is lacking. We evaluated the following questions: (1) Is there a difference in the revision risk following shoulder arthroplasty in patients who also undergo a lower-extremity TJA compared with those who do not? (2) Does the revision risk differ depending on the sequence of the procedures?

METHODS

Patients who underwent elective primary shoulder arthroplasty from 2009 through 2015 were identified using Kaiser Permanente's shoulder arthroplasty registry. Patients with a lower-extremity TJA were identified using the institution's total joint replacement registry. Revision related to the index shoulder was modeled via Cox regression stratified by procedure type and adjusted for confounders.

RESULTS

Of the 4751 shoulder arthroplasties identified, 1285 (27.0%) underwent a prior hip and/or knee arthroplasty and 483 (10.2%) underwent a hip and/or knee arthroplasty following the index shoulder arthroplasty. No difference was found in all-cause shoulder revision risk with lower-extremity TJA before (hazard ratio, 1.38; 95% confidence interval, 0.97-1.96) or after (hazard ratio, 1.30; 95% confidence interval, 0.82-2.06) the index shoulder arthroplasty compared with patients who underwent a shoulder arthroplasty only.

CONCLUSION

In our study sample, we did not observe shoulder revision surgery risk to be different in patients who also underwent a lower-extremity TJA, regardless of the sequence of the 2 procedures. Future prospective studies should investigate whether the timing of the lower-extremity TJA in relation to the shoulder procedure impacts the latter's success.

Toileting ability of patients after primary reverse total shoulder arthroplasty

Background

This study aimed to determine the toileting ability (TA) of patients undergoing primary reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) and identify factors associated with TA postoperatively.

Methods

A questionnaire regarding toileting was administered to 119 patients who underwent primary RTSA with a minimum 1-year follow-up. Patients were separated into 2 groups based on whether the arm that underwent RTSA was the one used for toileting (study group, n = 74) or not (control group, n = 45). Patient-reported TA was calculated both before and after RTSA. Multivariate analysis was performed to identify factors associated with TA postoperatively.

Results

Impairment in TA before RTSA was higher in the study group and affected almost three-quarters of the patients (72%). In the study group, primary RTSA resulted in a statistically significant improvement in TA (P < .001), and no difference in TA was found between groups after RTSA (P = .076). Postoperatively, 92% of the patients in the study group were able to manage toileting with the involved extremity (54% without difficulty and 38% with some degree of difficulty). Only 1 patient (1.3%) was totally unable to manage toileting with either arm postoperatively. The patients at risk of toileting difficulties postoperatively were those who had preoperative toileting difficulties and lower postoperative internal rotation range of motion.

Conclusions

Over 90% of patients can manage toileting after primary RTSA, and total toileting inability is rare after the procedure (1.3%). Patients should be counseled that after primary RTSA, they have a high probability of being able to manage toileting with independence even if it is with some difficulty.

Does Prolonged Use of Walkers in Shoulder Arthroplasty Patients Lead to Accelerated Failure Rates?

Introduction: The effect of weight-bearing on a shoulder arthroplasty (SA) remains unclear, and recommendations regarding the use of a walker in SA patients have not been established. The purpose of this study was to determine outcomes and survivorship of SA in patients who routinely use a walker.

Methods: Fifty-three primary SA (10 hemiarthroplasties (HAs), 33 anatomic total shoulder arthroplasties (TSAs), 10 reverse shoulder arthroplasties (RSAs)) in 41 walker-dependent patients were followed for a minimum of three years (mean 64 months, range, 36-156). The average age at SA was 76 years. Shoulders were assessed for pain, range of motion (ROM), satisfaction, Neer ratings, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, complications, survivorship, and radiographic outcomes.

Results: At most recent follow-up, 40 shoulders (75%) were pain free, elevation and external rotation improved significantly (P < .0001), and 87% of the patients were satisfied. Postoperative ASES scores averaged 74 (range, 38-92) points. There were 25 excellent, 16 satisfactory, and 12 unsatisfactory results based on modified Neer ratings. Four shoulders (7.5%) required reoperation at a mean of 40 months after the index arthroplasty. Radiographically, there were six cases of glenoid loosening in the anatomic SA group (25%), and two cases of severe glenoid erosion in the HA group (25%).

Conclusion: Routine use of a walker does not appear to lead to a markedly increased rate of SA failure at mid-term follow-up. Concerning radiographic findings were more common after HA and anatomic TSA than after RSA. Longer follow-up is required to determine the long-term impact of walker use on SA.

General health measures in shoulder surgery: are we powered for success?

BACKGROUND

Surgeons, policymakers, and payers increasingly use changes in general health to guide decision-making. It is unknown how such measures are incorporated into shoulder surgery research, how strongly they are associated with changes in shoulder-specific outcomes, and whether they are appropriately powered.

METHODS

PubMed was searched for articles reporting shoulder-specific and general health measures after rotator cuff repair and total shoulder arthroplasty. Study characteristics, results at the study group level, reporting of power calculations, and statistical significance were recorded. Meta-regression was employed to describe the association of changes between shoulder-specific and general health measures.

RESULTS

Of 360 identified abstracts, 21 articles with 28 patient groups were included. Only 1 article was published before 2000. There was a strong association of changes between shoulder-specific and general health measures (r = 0.66; P < .001). Power calculations were mentioned in 33% of studies and based on shoulder-specific measures. Of 20 studies conducting hypothesis tests, 75% reported agreement regarding the statistical significance of shoulder-specific and general health tests. Of 5 discordant studies, 4 found the shoulder-specific measure statistically significant and not the general health measure.

CONCLUSION

Shoulder surgery research increasingly reports changes in general health measures that are associated with changes in shoulder-specific measures, suggesting that improvements in shoulder symptoms increase quality of life. When disagreement exists, it usually results from the general health measure's not meeting statistical significance, which may simply reflect type II error. Research reporting general health measures should carefully report power considerations to avoid misinterpretation of findings failing to reach statistical significance.

Activity following reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: What should surgeons be advising?

BACKGROUND

Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) is now the most frequently performed form of shoulder arthroplasty. There is currently no consensus on recommended levels of activity and sport following RTSA. The aim of this review is to outline the current evidence and provide a guide for surgeons on what to advise their patients regarding activity level following RTSA.

METHODS

A systematic review of the literature was performed using the Preferred Reporting for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The search was performed using the electronic databases PubMed and Medline. Included studies were of level 1 to 4 evidence in the English language evaluating complications and return to sport after RTSA.

RESULTS

Eleven studies were selected and included a total of 621 patients (67% female) with a mean age of 73 years (range 22-92). All of the included patients participated in sports prior to RTSA. The rate of return to sport ranged from 60 to 86% and varied with the level of sport activity. Mean time to return to sport after surgery varied greatly between studies.

CONCLUSIONS

Return to sport is tolerated following RTSA; however, studies are short to medium term only and although the reported complication rate is low, the studies did not include radiographic evaluation. Longer term studies with subgroup analysis evaluating common recreational activities after RTSA are required, particularly in the younger population, in order to establish clear post-operative guidelines.

Should we avoid shoulder surgery in wheelchair users? A systematic review of outcomes and complications

INTRODUCTION

The prevalence of shoulder pathology in wheelchair dependent patients is high. The shoulder joint is critical for maintaining independence but traditionally there has been reluctance to offer surgical intervention in view of perceived poor outcomes. The aim of this study was to provide patients and surgeons with a realistic overview of outcomes following surgical intervention for shoulder pathology in wheelchair dependent patients.

METHODS

A systematic review of the online databases Medline and Embase was performed in September 2017. Studies reporting functional outcomes, complications or rate of revision surgery after shoulder surgery in patients' dependent on wheelchair for mobility were included. A narrative synthesis of the studies and appraisal using the MINORS tool was performed.

RESULTS

The search strategy identified 11 eligible studies; 7 assessed rotator cuff repair and 4-shoulder arthroplasty. Six of the seven studies reporting on rotator cuff repairs demonstrated improvement in pain, range of motion and functional outcomes with a retear rate between 12 and 39%. Although total shoulder arthroplasty and hemiarthroplasty reportedly improved pain and function, the subsequent risk of rotator cuff failure was reported up to 100%. The two studies assessing reverse arthroplasty demonstrated significant improvement in function and pain with the largest series reporting a 15.8% failure rate.

CONCLUSION

Rotator cuff repairs and reverse shoulder arthroplasties performed in wheelchair users are associated with significant functional improvement and a slightly higher complication profile to those performed in ambulatory patients. This review provides a resource to aid surgeons and patients in holding realistic expectations following shoulder surgery in wheelchair users.

Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty in the Weight-Bearing Versus Non-Weight-Bearing Shoulder: Mid-term Outcomes With Minimum 5-Year Follow-up

This retrospective review evaluated the mid-term outcomes of cemented reverse shoulder arthroplasty in patients who use the shoulder for weight bearing (WB) vs non-weight-bearing (NWB) patients. Twenty-five shoulders of 21 patients who used their upper extremity for WB (WB group) were treated with cemented reverse shoulder arthroplasty and followed for a minimum of 5 years postoperatively (average, 73 months). Seventy-five consecutive shoulders of 72 patients who were NWB (NWB group) were treated and matched for duration of follow-up (average, 72 months) to serve as a control group. Patients were followed clinically and radiographically. There were no statistically significant differences between the WB group and the NWB group regarding final outcome scores or range of motion. Patient satisfaction was similar between the WB group (92%) and the NWB group (94%). The scapular notching rate was 20% in the WB group compared with 5% in the NWB group (P=.041). Humeral loosening occurred in 12% of the WB group vs 0% of the NWB group (P=.014). The complication rate was higher in the WB group than in the NWB group (12% vs 4%). The WB group and the NWB group had similar outcome scores, range of motion improvements, and patient satisfaction after reverse shoulder arthroplasty. At mid-term follow-up, the WB group had a higher scapular notching rate, humeral loosening rate, and complication rate than the NWB group. [Orthopedics. 2018; 41(3):e328-e333.].

Can patients manage toileting after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty? A systematic review

PURPOSE

A major concern for patients undergoing reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) is managing toileting after surgery. The goals of this systematic review of RTSA studies were to determine the following: (1) the percentage of patients who can manage toileting, (2) their degree of difficulty with toileting, and (3) the percentage of patients who can manage toileting after bilateral versus unilateral RTSA.

METHODS

Medline, EMBASE, Google Scholar, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched for studies reporting the ability to manage toileting after RTSA. Six studies with at least 12 months of follow-up were included, yielding 183 patients (105 unilateral RTSA, 78 bilateral RTSA). We pooled patient data and calculated the weighted mean proportion of patients able to manage toileting, those who reported difficulty, and those able to manage toileting after unilateral versus bilateral RTSA. Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05.

RESULTS

Most patients (92%; 95% confidence interval, 87-95%) were able to manage toileting after RTSA. Some degree of difficulty with toileting was reported for 20% of all shoulders. Almost all patients with bilateral RTSA were able to manage toileting with at least one arm (weighted mean proportion 97%; 95% confidence interval, 88-99%). There was no significant difference in the proportion of patients able to manage toileting after unilateral versus bilateral RTSA (P = 0.08). Only 3% of all papers published on the clinical results of RTSA by June 2017 reported upon toileting after the procedure.

CONCLUSIONS

With the available evidence, most patients were able to manage toileting after RTSA, although one-fifth reported some degree of difficulty. Ability to manage toileting was similar after unilateral versus bilateral RTSA. In the future, this variable should be a standard question after shoulder arthroplasty.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty in Weight-Bearing Shoulders of Wheelchair-Dependent Patients: Outcomes and Complications at 2 to 5 years

BACKGROUND

Wheelchair-dependent patients rely on their upper extremities for mobility and transfers. This entails the heavy use of upper extremities as weight-bearing joints, leading to shoulder overuse with increased prevalence of rotator cuff-related disorders and ultimately to challenging cases for shoulder surgeons when a joint replacement is needed.

OBJECTIVE

To report the outcomes of reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) in wheelchair-dependent patients with arthritis and rotator cuff tears.

DESIGN

Retrospective case series/cross-sectional study.

SETTING

Tertiary university hospital.

PATIENT (PARTICIPANTS)

All wheelchair-dependent patients undergoing RSA between 2004 and 2013.

METHODS/INTERVENTIONS

Of the 22 wheelchair-dependent patients undergoing RSA, 18 of them had a minimum follow-up of 2 years. There were 9 men and 9 women, with a mean (standard deviation) age and length of follow-up of 68 (8.5) years and 36 (24-63) months. A retrospective chart review and cross-sectional phone calls were conducted to obtain all data.

OUTCOMES

Pain, range of motion, functional scores (Neer scale, simple shoulder test, and American Shoulder and Elbow Society), satisfaction, complications/reoperations, radiographic loosening, and 90-day mortality/morbidity.

RESULTS

RSA resulted in a significant improvement in pain (P = .02) and nonsignificant improvements in forward flexion (P = .3) and external rotation (P = .07). There were 3 (16%) excellent, 12 (63%) satisfactory, and 4 (21%) unsatisfactory results. The mean (standard deviation) postoperative American Shoulder and Elbow Society score was 56.5 (16.5). All patients stated that they would undergo RSA again. There were no surgically related complications or reoperations. The 90-day mortality and morbidity rates were 0% and 26%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

RSA is a safe and effective procedure in wheelchair-dependent patients who use their shoulders for weight-bearing purposes. Although functional scores are not optimal and medical complications are not uncommon, 79% of patients had an excellent or satisfactory result.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty as Treatment for Rotator Cuff-Tear Arthropathy and Shoulder Dislocations in an Elderly Male with Parkinson's Disease

We report the case of a 70-year-old male with Parkinson's disease (PD) and recurrent traumatic left shoulder dislocations. This case is rare because (1) he had a massive irreparable rotator cuff tear and end-stage arthritis (i.e., rotator cuff-tear arthropathy) of the same shoulder and (2) his shoulder was ultimately reconstructed with a reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA). His first dislocation occurred after a fall. Recurrent shoulder dislocations occurred despite successful closed reduction and physical therapy. Initial surgical treatment included an open capsular-labral reconstruction; RTSA was not an ideal option because of the presumed risk of failure from PD-related dyskinesias. However, the capsular-labral reconstruction failed after he lost balance and stumbled but did not fall. A RTSA was then done which restored the patient's shoulder stability and greatly improved his pain. At final follow-up two years later, he reported pain relief and improved function. This was partially attributed to the fact that he had moved to an assisted living center. He also began using an electric wheelchair one year after the RTSA. We report this case because of the unusual set of conditions and circumstances, namely, the implantation of a RTSA in a patient with PD and shoulder instability.