1
|
Kjelle E, Brandsæter IØ, Andersen ER, Hofmann BM. Cost of Low-Value Imaging Worldwide: A Systematic Review. APPLIED HEALTH ECONOMICS AND HEALTH POLICY 2024; 22:485-501. [PMID: 38427217 PMCID: PMC11178636 DOI: 10.1007/s40258-024-00876-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/11/2024] [Indexed: 03/02/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE Imaging with low or no benefit for the patient undermines the quality of care and amounts to vast opportunity costs. More than 3.6 billion imaging examinations are performed annually, and about 20-50% of these are of low value. This study aimed to synthesize knowledge of the costs of low-value imaging worldwide. METHODS This systematic review was based on the PRISMA statement. The database search was developed in Medline and further adapted to Embase-Ovid, Cochrane Library, and Scopus. Primary empirical studies assessing the costs of low-value diagnostic imaging were included if published between 2012 and March 2022. Studies designed as randomized controlled trials, non-randomized trials, cohort studies, cross-sectional studies, descriptive studies, cost analysis, cost-effectiveness analysis, and mixed-methods studies were eligible. The analysis was descriptive. RESULTS Of 5,567 records identified, 106 were included. Most of the studies included were conducted in the USA (n = 76), and a hospital or medical center was the most common setting (n = 82). Thirty-eight of the included studies calculated the costs of multiple imaging modalities; in studies with only one imaging modality included, conventional radiography was the most common (n = 32). Aggregated costs for low-value examinations amounts to billions of dollars per year globally. Initiatives to reduce low-value imaging may reduce costs by up to 95% without harming patients. CONCLUSIONS This study is the first systematic review of the cost of low-value imaging worldwide, documenting a high potential for cost reduction. Given the universal challenges with resource allocation, the large amount used for low-value imaging represents a vast opportunity cost and offers great potential to improve the quality and efficiency of care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elin Kjelle
- Department of Health Sciences, Gjøvik at the Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU) at Gjøvik, Postbox 191, 2802, Gjøvik, Norway.
| | - Ingrid Øfsti Brandsæter
- Department of Health Sciences, Gjøvik at the Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU) at Gjøvik, Postbox 191, 2802, Gjøvik, Norway
| | - Eivind Richter Andersen
- Department of Health Sciences, Gjøvik at the Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU) at Gjøvik, Postbox 191, 2802, Gjøvik, Norway
| | - Bjørn Morten Hofmann
- Department of Health Sciences, Gjøvik at the Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU) at Gjøvik, Postbox 191, 2802, Gjøvik, Norway
- Centre of Medical Ethics at the University of Oslo, Blindern, Postbox 1130, 0318, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Davey MS, Hurley ET, Liu K, White-Gibson A, Molony DC, Moran CJ, Delaney RA, Mullett H. The clinical utility of immediate post-operative PACU plain film radiographs following uncomplicated open Latarjet procedure - An institutional series of consecutive patients. J Orthop 2023; 46:178-181. [PMID: 38037554 PMCID: PMC10685133 DOI: 10.1016/j.jor.2023.11.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2023] [Accepted: 11/03/2023] [Indexed: 12/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Immediate post-operative plain film radiograph x-rays in PACU following open Latarjet procedure are often ordered as routine. However, such radiographs utilize institutional cost and time, whilst potentially exposing patients to often-unnecessary additional radiation. This study sought to evaluate whether routine immediate post-operative radiographs following uncomplicated open Latarjet procedures impacted clinical decision-making in our institution. Methods From 2017 to 2020, patients who underwent open Latarjet procedure by one of four fellowship-trained upper limb surgeons at a single institution were included in this study. Post-operative radiographs taken immediately in PACU were reviewed to determine if any reported radiographic findings impacted on clinical decision-making in the immediate post-operative setting. SPSS was used for descriptive statistics. Results A total of 337 patients underwent an X-ray in PACU immediate after uncomplicated open Latarjet procedure. Overall, 98.5% were male (n = 332), the mean patient age of included patients was 22.9 ± 4.2 years. No patient had an abnormal finding on their post-operative x-ray. Two patients returned to the operating room in the immediate post-operative period, both requiring washout and debridement due to haemtoma or superficial wound infection. Conclusion The findings of this study suggest that the use of post-operative plain films in PACU following open Latarjet procedure remains a costly use of resources, with little ultimate impact on clinical decision making in the short-term post-operatively. Level of Evidence IV - Institutional Case Series of Consecutive Patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Kathy Liu
- Sports Surgery Clinic, Dublin, Ireland
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kunze KN, Jang SJ, Li TY, Pareek A, Finocchiaro A, Fu MC, Taylor SA, Dines JS, Dines DM, Warren RF, Gulotta LV. Artificial intelligence for automated identification of total shoulder arthroplasty implants. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2023; 32:2115-2122. [PMID: 37172888 DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2023.03.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2022] [Revised: 03/03/2023] [Accepted: 03/22/2023] [Indexed: 05/15/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Accurate and rapid identification of implant manufacturer and model is critical in the evaluation and management of patients requiring revision total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA). Failure to correctly identify implant designs in these circumstances may lead to delay in care, unexpected intraoperative challenges, increased morbidity, and excess health care costs. Deep learning (DL) permits automated image processing and holds the potential to mitigate such challenges while improving the value of care rendered. The purpose of this study was to develop an automated DL algorithm to identify shoulder arthroplasty implants from plain radiographs. METHODS A total of 3060 postoperative images from patients who underwent TSA between 2011 and 2021 performed by 26 fellowship-trained surgeons at 2 independent tertiary academic hospitals in the Pacific Northwest and Mid-Atlantic Northeast were included. A DL algorithm was trained using transfer learning and data augmentation to classify 22 different reverse TSA and anatomic TSA prostheses from 8 implant manufacturers. Images were split into training and testing cohorts (2448 training and 612 testing images). Optimized model performance was assessed using standardized metrics including the multiclass area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) and compared with a reference standard of implant data from operative reports. RESULTS The algorithm classified implants at a mean speed of 0.079 seconds (±0.002 seconds) per image. The optimized model discriminated between 8 manufacturers (22 unique implants) with AUROCs of 0.994-1.000, accuracy of 97.1%, and sensitivities between 0.80 and 1.00 on the independent testing set. In the subset of single-institution implant predictions, a DL model identified 6 specific implants with AUROCs of 0.999-1.000, accuracy of 99.4%, and sensitivity >0.97 for all implants. Saliency maps revealed key differentiating features across implant manufacturers and designs recognized by the algorithm for classification. CONCLUSION A DL model demonstrated excellent accuracy in identifying 22 unique TSA implants from 8 manufacturers. This algorithm may provide a clinically meaningful adjunct in assisting with preoperative planning for the failed TSA and allows for scalable expansion with additional radiographic data and validation efforts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kyle N Kunze
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA; Sports Medicine and Shoulder Institute, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA.
| | | | - Tim Y Li
- Weill Cornell College of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Ayoosh Pareek
- Sports Medicine and Shoulder Institute, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA
| | - Anthony Finocchiaro
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA; Sports Medicine and Shoulder Institute, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA
| | - Michael C Fu
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA; Sports Medicine and Shoulder Institute, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA
| | - Samuel A Taylor
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA; Sports Medicine and Shoulder Institute, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA
| | - Joshua S Dines
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA; Sports Medicine and Shoulder Institute, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA
| | - David M Dines
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA; Sports Medicine and Shoulder Institute, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA
| | - Russell F Warren
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA; Sports Medicine and Shoulder Institute, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA
| | - Lawrence V Gulotta
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA; Sports Medicine and Shoulder Institute, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Roberts CC, Metter DF, Fox MG, Appel M, Jawetz ST, Morrison WB, Nacey N, Said N, Stensby JD, Subhas N, Tynus KM, Walker EA, Yu JS, Kransdorf MJ. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Imaging After Shoulder Arthroplasty: 2021 Update. J Am Coll Radiol 2022; 19:S53-S66. [PMID: 35550805 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2022.02.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2022] [Accepted: 02/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
Shoulder arthroplasty is a common orthopedic procedure with a complication rate reported to be as high as 39.8% and revision rates as high as 11%. Symptoms related to postoperative difficulties include activity-related pain, decreased range of motion, and apprehension. Some patients report immediate and persistent dissatisfaction, although others report a symptom-free postoperative period followed by increasing pain and decreasing shoulder function and mobility. Imaging plays an important role in diagnosing postoperative complications of shoulder arthroplasties. The imaging algorithm should always begin with radiographs. The selection of the next imaging modality depends on several factors, including findings on the initial imaging study, clinical suspicion of an osseous versus soft-tissue injury, and clinical suspicion of infection.The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Michael G Fox
- Panel Chair, Musculoskeletal Division Chair and Diagnostic Radiology Program Director, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, Arizona
| | - Marc Appel
- James J. Peters VA Medical Center, Bronx, New York; American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons; and liaison with AOOS
| | - Shari T Jawetz
- Director, Radiology Quality Assurance; Director, Radiology Resident and Medical Student Education; and Chief, Division of Body CT, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York
| | - William B Morrison
- Director, Division of Musculoskeletal Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; ACR education center faculty; ACR AIRP faculty; ACR CPI author
| | - Nicholas Nacey
- Fellowship Director, Imaging Center Medical Director, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Nicholas Said
- Medical Director of MRI Duke University Health System, Access Champion Department of Radiology, Director of Musculoskeletal Intervention, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - James D Stensby
- MSK Imaging Fellowship Director, University of Missouri Health Care, Columbia, Missouri
| | - Naveen Subhas
- Vice Chair of Clinical Effectiveness and Efficiency, Imaging Institute Program Director, Musculoskeletal Radiology; and Director, Bone Mineral Densitometry, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Katherine M Tynus
- Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Chicago, Illinois; American College of Physicians
| | - Eric A Walker
- Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania and Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland; Past President of the Penn State College of Medicine Faculty Organization, ACR local chapter PRS President Elect
| | - Joseph S Yu
- The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kjelle E, Andersen ER, Krokeide AM, Soril LJJ, van Bodegom-Vos L, Clement FM, Hofmann BM. Characterizing and quantifying low-value diagnostic imaging internationally: a scoping review. BMC Med Imaging 2022; 22:73. [PMID: 35448987 PMCID: PMC9022417 DOI: 10.1186/s12880-022-00798-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2021] [Accepted: 04/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Inappropriate and wasteful use of health care resources is a common problem, constituting 10-34% of health services spending in the western world. Even though diagnostic imaging is vital for identifying correct diagnoses and administrating the right treatment, low-value imaging-in which the diagnostic test confers little to no clinical benefit-is common and contributes to inappropriate and wasteful use of health care resources. There is a lack of knowledge on the types and extent of low-value imaging. Accordingly, the objective of this study was to identify, characterize, and quantify the extent of low-value diagnostic imaging examinations for adults and children. METHODS A scoping review of the published literature was performed. Medline-Ovid, Embase-Ovid, Scopus, and Cochrane Library were searched for studies published from 2010 to September 2020. The search strategy was built from medical subject headings (Mesh) for Diagnostic imaging/Radiology OR Health service misuse/Medical overuse OR Procedures and Techniques Utilization/Facilities and Services Utilization. Articles in English, German, Dutch, Swedish, Danish, or Norwegian were included. RESULTS A total of 39,986 records were identified and, of these, 370 studies were included in the final synthesis. Eighty-four low-value imaging examinations were identified. Imaging of atraumatic pain, routine imaging in minor head injury, trauma, thrombosis, urolithiasis, after thoracic interventions, fracture follow-up and cancer staging/follow-up were the most frequently identified low-value imaging examinations. The proportion of low-value imaging varied between 2 and 100% inappropriate or unnecessary examinations. CONCLUSIONS A comprehensive list of identified low-value radiological examinations for both adults and children are presented. Future research should focus on reasons for low-value imaging utilization and interventions to reduce the use of low-value imaging internationally. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION PROSPERO: CRD42020208072.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elin Kjelle
- Institute for the Health Sciences, The Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU) at Gjøvik, NTNU Gjøvik, Postbox 191, 2802, Gjøvik, Norway.
| | - Eivind Richter Andersen
- Institute for the Health Sciences, The Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU) at Gjøvik, NTNU Gjøvik, Postbox 191, 2802, Gjøvik, Norway
| | - Arne Magnus Krokeide
- Institute for the Health Sciences, The Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU) at Gjøvik, NTNU Gjøvik, Postbox 191, 2802, Gjøvik, Norway
| | - Lesley J J Soril
- Department of Community Health Sciences and The Health Technology Assessment Unit, O'Brien Institute for Public Health, University of Calgary, 3280 Hospital Dr NW, Calgary, AB, T2N 4Z6, Canada
| | - Leti van Bodegom-Vos
- Medical Decision Making, Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Center, P.O. Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Fiona M Clement
- Department of Community Health Sciences and The Health Technology Assessment Unit, O'Brien Institute for Public Health, University of Calgary, 3280 Hospital Dr NW, Calgary, AB, T2N 4Z6, Canada
| | - Bjørn Morten Hofmann
- Institute for the Health Sciences, The Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU) at Gjøvik, NTNU Gjøvik, Postbox 191, 2802, Gjøvik, Norway
- Centre of Medical Ethics, The University of Oslo, Blindern, Postbox 1130, 0318, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Villacis DC, Chauhan A, Asselmeier M, Walsh K, Murphy B, Romeo A. Clinical utility of immediate postoperative radiographs following uncomplicated primary reverse shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2021; 30:2370-2374. [PMID: 33711498 DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2021.02.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2020] [Revised: 02/08/2021] [Accepted: 02/13/2021] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND It is common practice to order an immediate postoperative radiograph in the postanesthesia care unit (PACU) following reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA). However, with a growing emphasis on value-based care and cost-effectiveness, we question the necessity for immediate postoperative radiographs following uncomplicated, primary RSA. METHODS From 2014-2020, patients undergoing primary RSA at a single institution by one of 3 surgeons were included in this cohort. Radiographs from the PACU and any clinic visit during the initial 3-month postoperative period were reviewed to determine if any radiographic findings from the PACU altered clinical care or decision making. RESULTS A total of 157 patients were included in this study and 13 patients had abnormal findings during the initial 3-month postoperative period where the immediate postoperative radiograph provided clinical utility for decision making. In 9 of the 12 patients requiring revision surgery, the postoperative complication was instability. In those patients requiring revision surgery during the initial 3 months, the most common indication for primary surgery was proximal humerus nonunion. Immediate postoperative radiographs were read by the radiologist as normal/unremarkable for 100% of patients. The typical amount billed for the immediate postoperative radiograph was $544.00 per patient. CONCLUSION Based on our findings, we see utility for an intraoperative or immediate postoperative radiograph following uncomplicated, primary RSA, especially when done as a salvage procedure for indications such as proximal humerus nonunion. However, there is low utility for obtaining an immediate postoperative radiograph in the PACU when indications include osteoarthritis or rotator cuff tear arthropathy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Diego C Villacis
- Musculoskeletal Institute, Dupage Medical Group, Downers Grove, IL, USA.
| | - Aakash Chauhan
- Musculoskeletal Institute, Dupage Medical Group, Downers Grove, IL, USA
| | - Marc Asselmeier
- Musculoskeletal Institute, Dupage Medical Group, Downers Grove, IL, USA
| | - Kevin Walsh
- Musculoskeletal Institute, Dupage Medical Group, Downers Grove, IL, USA
| | - Brian Murphy
- Musculoskeletal Institute, Dupage Medical Group, Downers Grove, IL, USA
| | - Anthony Romeo
- Musculoskeletal Institute, Dupage Medical Group, Downers Grove, IL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Routine postoperative radiographs after tibia plateau fixation have minimal impact on patient care. Injury 2019; 50:2093-2096. [PMID: 31383354 DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2019.07.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2019] [Revised: 06/21/2019] [Accepted: 07/21/2019] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Common practice in orthopedic surgery is to obtain postoperative radiographs to evaluate for healing or complications. Images obtained in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) have not been shown to positively impact patient care. This study plans to evaluate the clinical utility and cost-effectiveness of PACU postoperative radiographs following tibial plateau open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF). METHODS Data from 211 patients who underwent a tibial plateau ORIF over a 5-year period at a single institution were retrospectively reviewed to determine if a patient received a postoperative radiograph in the PACU. Radiograph and clinical notes were reviewed to determine if postoperative radiograph resulted in management changes. Radiograph charges were calculated using CPT codes. RESULTS A total of 142 of 211 patients (67.3%) who underwent tibial plateau ORIF received a postoperative radiograph while in the PACU. The majority of the radiographs had normal findings (88.7%). Of the 142 patients with postoperative imaging, subsequent management changes occurred for only one patient (0.7%). In this case, an incidental foot fracture was found which resulted in further CT imaging to assess the fracture. Other abnormal radiograph readings (11.3%) were generally due to incidental, chronic findings that did not require management changes. The average postoperative radiograph cost was $433.55 per patient, totaling $91,480 for 142 patients over a 5-year period. CONCLUSIONS Routine postoperative radiographs following tibial plateau ORIF resulted in minimal management change patients in this series. The substantial cost of postoperative radiographs yielding little clinical utility suggests the use of routine PACU imaging following tibial plateau ORIF should be discontinued. Imaging would only be indicated in situations where intraoperative complications are suspected, thus reducing unnecessary imaging and patient cost.
Collapse
|