What is the hardware removal rate after anteroinferior plating of the clavicle? A retrospective cohort study

Distal clavicle fractures treated by anteroinferior plating with a single screw: Two case reports

BACKGROUND

For the treatment of distal clavicle fractures, each treatment method has its own advantages and disadvantages, and there is no optimal surgical solution.

CASE SUMMARY

Based on this, we report 2 cases of distal clavicle fractures treated utilizing an anterior inferior plate with a single screw placed in the distal, in anticipation of providing a better surgical approach to distal clavicle fracture treatment. Two patients were admitted to the hospital after trauma with a diagnosis of distal clavicle fracture, and were admitted to the hospital for internal fixation of clavicle fracture by incision and reduction, with good postoperative functional recovery.

CONCLUSION

With solid postoperative fixation and satisfactory prognostic functional recovery, this technique has been shown to be simple, easy to perform and effective.

Low rate of secondary surgery and implant removal following superior, precontoured plating of midshaft clavicle fractures

Background

Surgical fixation of midshaft clavicle fractures with a single 3.5 mm superior clavicular plate has been associated with a high rate of hardware removal due to symptomatic hardware. Because of this, dual-plating techniques with lower-profile implants have been proposed. However, dual-plating systems have disadvantages, including increased cost and increased surgical morbidity. The aim of this study was to define the rate of symptomatic hardware removal for all midshaft clavicle fractures.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed information on all patients from 2014 to 2018 at a single level 1 trauma institution with surgeries performed by two fellowship-trained orthopedic trauma surgeons. Documented removal of hardware and the reason for removal were recorded. We then contacted all patients at their listed telephone number to confirm the hardware was still in place and to administer patient outcome questionnaires. If patients did not answer, attempts were made to contact them multiple times on multiple days. Those who were not reached but had documented hardware removal were included in the total number of patients with hardware removal.

Results

The search revealed 158 patients, of whom 89 (61.8%) were included in the study. Average follow up was 4.09 years (range 2.02-6.50 years). Five patients (5.56%) underwent hardware removal. Removal was for symptomatic or irritating hardware in two of these patients (2.22%). Average abbreviated Disability of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score was 6.27, and average American Society of Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons shoulder score was 93.6.

Conclusion

In our series, the rate of symptomatic hardware removal was 2.22%, well below reported removal rates. Hardware removal rates for prominent symptomatic superior clavicular plates may be significantly lower than previously reported, and these fractures may be adequately treated with a single, superior plate.

Anteroinferior plating is an independent factor for decreasing symptomatic implant removal rates after plate fixation for midshaft clavicle fractures

Objectives

The factors that significantly influence the symptomatic implant removal rates after plate fixation for midshaft clavicle fractures remain controversial. The purpose of this study was to compare the symptomatic implant removal rates between 2 different types of plating technique and to evaluate independently associated factors.

Design

Retrospective cohort study.

Setting

Acute care center.

Patients/Participants

A total of 71 patients 16 years or older who were diagnosed with displaced midshaft clavicle fractures from April 2016 to March 2020.

Intervention

Thirty-nine patients were treated with superior plating (Group SP), and the remaining 32 patients were treated with anteroinferior plating (Group AIP).

Main Outcome Measurements

Symptomatic implant removal rates after plate fixation for midshaft clavicle fractures.

Results

Symptomatic implant removal rates were significantly lower in Group AIP (28.1%) than in Group SP (53.8%) (P = 0.033). Multivariate analyses showed that symptomatic implant removal rates were significantly decreased by three independent factors, namely AIP (odds ratio [OR] = 0.323) (P = 0.037), greater age (45 years or older) (OR = 0.312) (P = 0.029), and high body mass index (≥25 kg/m²) (OR = 0.117) (P = 0.034).

Conclusions

AIP significantly and independently decreased the symptomatic implant removal rate. Among the three explanatory factors showing significant difference, plating technique is the only factor that can be altered by medical institutions. Therefore, we recommend this technique for displaced midshaft clavicle fractures to reduce a second surgery such as symptomatic implant removal.

Level of Evidence

Level 3, retrospective cohort study.

Trends in the Treatment of Adolescent Clavicle Fractures: Are We Listening to the Evidence?

BACKGROUND

From 1999 to 2011, studies demonstrated an increasing trend toward surgical management of adolescent clavicle fractures. The purpose of this study was to examine more recent trends of surgical management of closed clavicle fractures in adolescent patients over the past decade.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted using the PearlDiver database. Patients with clavicle fractures from 2011 to 2021 were identified and stratified by age, sex, and year of their fracture. Categorical variables were compared with a chi square test, and continuous variables were compared with the Welch t test or Mann-Whitney U test.

RESULTS

Overall, there was a significant increase in the percentage of patients surgically treated by open reduction and internal fixation from 2016 to 2021 compared with 2011 to 2015 (8.58% vs. 7.34%, P < 0.001). When stratified by age, both the 10 to 14-year group (3.80% vs. 3.10%, P < 0.001) and the 15 to 18-year group (15.41% vs. 12.84%, P < 0.001) demonstrated significant increases in the percentage of patients surgically treated.

CONCLUSION

Despite increasing literature demonstrating high revision surgery rates for surgical treatment of adolescent clavicle fractures with no difference in functional outcomes, this study demonstrated a notable increase in the rate of surgical treatment of adolescent clavicle fractures from 2011 to 2021 in the United States.

Are two plates better than one? A systematic review of dual plating for acute midshaft clavicle fractures

BACKGROUND

The rate of operative fixation of acute midshaft clavicle fractures has exponentially increased in recent years; however, the rate of reoperation for symptomatic hardware removal remains high and the optimal fixation strategy unknown. This systematic review aimed to summarize available evidence for dual plating of acute displaced midshaft clavicle fractures.

METHODS

EMBASE, MEDLINE, and PubMed searches identified clinical studies evaluating dual plate fixation of acute midshaft clavicle fractures. Pooled analysis was performed using a random-effects model in RevMan 5.3.

RESULTS

Eleven studies including 672 patients were included. Hardware removal occurred in 4.4% and 12.3% of patients undergoing dual and single plate fixation, respectively. Compared to single plating, dual plating had significantly lower odds of hardware removal (P = 0.001) with no difference in union rates. There were no significant differences in reoperation (excluding hardware removal), complications, and patient-reported outcomes between the two groups (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that dual plating of acute displaced midshaft clavicle fractures may lead to lower rates of reoperation for symptomatic hardware removal without compromising fracture healing. Ultimately, well-designed randomized trials are needed to further investigate the findings from this systematic review.

Risk Factors for Implant Removal After Surgical Fixation of Midshaft Clavicle Fractures

Midshaft clavicle fractures are common injuries that traditionally have been managed nonoperatively. However, recent literature has shown lower rates of nonunion and improved patient-reported outcomes with surgical management. The rate of implant removal after surgical fixation varies across the literature from 5% to 82%, depending on the method of fixation. We performed a retrospective review of all patients who underwent open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) with plate-and-screw constructs for midshaft fractures of the clavicle at 2 level I trauma centers to determine the rate of implant removal and identify variables associated with implant removal. We collected all patient-, injury-, and treatment-specific factors as well as information on reoperation for removal of implants. Bivariate analysis and multivariable logistic regression analysis were used to assess whether explanatory factors were associated with removal of implants after ORIF for midshaft clavicle fractures. Of the 146 patients who were treated with ORIF for midshaft clavicle fractures with plate-and-screw constructs, 41 (28%) underwent removal of the implant. The median follow-up was 836 days (interquartile range, 457-1567 days). Variables associated with increased risk of implant removal included anterior plate position (odds ratio, 5.32; 95% CI, 2.01-14.1) and number of holes in the plate (odds ratio, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.00-1.63). These results question whether anterior plating results in less implant prominence and less subsequent removal of implants. [Orthopedics. 2022;45(4):e201-e206.].

Results of pre-contoured titanium anterior plating of midshaft clavicle fractures

BACKGROUND

Plating midshaft clavicle fractures anteriorly is gaining popularity because of low complication rates. Improvements in plate fixation constructs for midshaft clavicle fractures have unclear clinical significance. The purpose of this study was to present the early clinical and radiographic outcomes of pre-contoured titanium anterior plates for the treatment of midshaft clavicle fractures.

METHODS

Skeletally mature patients who underwent plate fixation of a midshaft clavicular fracture from 2008 to 2015 using pre-contoured titanium anterior plates were included in this retrospective investigation. The primary outcome measures were union rate and hardware removal rate. The secondary outcome measures included reoperation for all causes and mechanical implant failure.

RESULTS

A total of 26 patients were included. Complete healing occurred in 96% of patients without further surgical intervention, and all patients achieved union. Medical complications occurred in 2 patients (7.7%), consisting of cellulitis (n = 1) and chronic pain (n = 1). In 1 patient (3.8%), delayed union occurred and the use of a bone stimulator was required postoperatively to achieve union. Finally, 2 patients (7.7%) had symptomatic implants that required removal.

CONCLUSIONS

In the acute fracture setting, the anterior plating system used in this study led to a high rate of union with decreased rates of implant irritation. Only 7.7% of patients required hardware removal for symptomatic hardware, as opposed to the estimated 20%-60% reported in the literature in patients with symptomatic superior clavicle plates.

The emergency medicine management of clavicle fractures

BACKGROUND

Clavicle fractures are common. An emergency physician needs to understand the diagnostic classifications of clavicle fractures, have a plan for immobilization, identify associated injuries, understand the difference between treating pediatric and adult patients, and have an approach to multimodal pain control. It is also important to understand when expert orthopedic consultation or referral is indicated.

OBJECTIVE OF THE REVIEW

To provide an evidence-based review of clavicle fracture management in the emergency department.

DISCUSSION

Clavicle fractures account for up to 4% of all fractures evaluated in the emergency department. They can be separated into midshaft, distal, and proximal fractures. They are also classified in terms of their degree of displacement, comminution and shortening. Emergent referral is indicated for open fractures, posteriorly displaced proximal fractures, and those with emergent associated injuries. Urgent referral is warranted for fractures with greater than 100% displacement, fractures with >2 cm of shortening, comminuted fractures, unstable distal fractures, and floating shoulder. Nondisplaced or minimally displaced fractures with no instability or associated neurovascular injury are managed non-operatively with a sling. Pediatric fractures are generally managed conservatively, with adolescents older than 9 years-old for girls and 12 years-old for boys being treated using algorithms that are similar to adults.

CONCLUSIONS

When encountering a patient with a clavicle fracture in the emergency department the fracture pattern will help determine whether emergent consultation or urgent referral is indicated. Most patients can be discharged safely with sling immobilization and appropriate outpatient follow-up.

Risk factors for hardware removal following operative treatment of middle- and distal-third clavicular fractures

BACKGROUND

The incidence of hardware removal (HWR) after operative fixation of clavicular fractures varies widely. Risk factors related to HWR remain incompletely understood. The aim of this study was to evaluate the incidence of and risk factors for HWR after plate fixation of middle- and distal-third clavicular fractures. We hypothesized that (1) the total HWR incidence would be <20%, (2) the HWR incidence of operatively treated distal- and middle-third clavicular fractures would not be statistically different, and (3) symptomatic implants would be the most common HWR indication.

METHODS

We performed a multi-hospital retrospective study of skeletally mature patients who underwent plate fixation of middle- and distal-third clavicular fractures from November 2008 to November 2018. Data included patient demographic characteristics, mechanism of injury, operative records, hardware-related symptoms, subsequent HWR, and complications.

RESULTS

A total of 103 patients (aged 16-75 years, 76.7% male patients) were included. Of the patients, 87 (84.5%) underwent plate fixation for midshaft clavicular fractures and 16 (15.5%) underwent plate fixation for distal-third clavicular fractures. HWR was performed in 13 patients (12.6%). A significantly higher percentage of HWR procedures were performed for distal clavicular fractures (50%) than for middle-third clavicular fractures (4.9%, P < .0001). An initial high-energy mechanism of injury was associated with HWR (P = .0025). The most common indication for HWR was symptomatic hardware (69.2%). The overall complication rate was 14.5%.

CONCLUSION

The overall incidence of clavicular HWR was 12.6%. A distal fracture location was associated with a significantly higher incidence of HWR. An initial high-energy mechanism of injury was a significant risk factor for HWR. The primary indication for HWR was symptomatic hardware.

Experiencia en fracturas de clavícula mediodiafisaria con placa de reconstrucción en posición anteroinferior en pacientes del Hospital José Carrasco Arteaga, IESS 2017 Cuenca – Ecuador

Las fracturas mediodiafisarias de clavícula corresponden del 75% al 80% de los casos de fracturas claviculares. En el contexto quirúrgico, existen dos técnicas para reparar este tipo de fracturas: la colocación de placa en posición superior y en posición anteroinferior. La primera técnica es la más usada; sin embargo, la segunda brinda una temprana recuperación, minimiza pérdida de sangre y disminuye intervenciones secundarias con reducción económica en salud. Demostrando ser más efectiva. El objetivo del presente trabajo fue evaluar las ventajas de la técnica de colocación de placa en posición anteroinferior para fractura mediodiafisaria de clavícula. Se estudiaron una serie de casos que describe las ventajas de la técnica de colocación de placa en posición anteroinferior por fractura mediodiafisaria de clavícula en el hospital José Carrasco Arteaga, entre enero a diciembre del año 2017. Analizado mediante estadística descriptiva. Se estudiaron 12 pacientes masculinos entre los 18 y 30 años, previo consentimiento informado y cumplieron con criterios de inclusión. Los datos se obtuvieron de resultados de procedimientos quirúrgicos y fueron analizados en Microsoft Excel. Todas las fracturas mediodiafisarias de clavícula se trataron con colocación de una placa de 6 a 8 orificios de 3.5mm de reconstrucción en posición anteroinferior. No se presentaron complicaciones intra ni posoperatorios. Consolidaron al mes y medio con un buen resultado funcional. La técnica de colocación de placa en posición anteroinferior ofrece el retorno temprano de la función del hombro y evita el riesgo de lesión neurovascular. Además, presenta una baja tasa de prominencia del implante.

Operative Versus Nonoperative Outcomes of Middle-Third Clavicle Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVES

Middle third clavicle fractures have long been managed conservatively with immobilization. Some patients, especially those with completely displaced or shortened clavicle fractures are now thought to have increased risk of nonunion or symptomatic malunion. The authors performed a meta-analysis to study the incidence of nonunion and symptomatic malunion and test the hypothesis that surgical fixation of these fractures significantly lowers the risk of these complications.

METHODS

A search was performed in the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases for randomized clinical trials and quasi-experimental trials that compare outcomes of operative and nonoperative management for clavicle fractures that are fully (100%) displaced or have greater than 2 cm of shortening. Pooled patient data were used to construct forest plots for the meta-analysis.

RESULTS

Eleven studies including 497 patients who were treated and 457 patients treated conservatively were analyzed. Patients managed operatively had significantly lower relative risk of developing nonunion [0.17 (95% confidence interval 0.08-0.33)] and symptomatic malunion [0.13 (95% confidence interval 0.05-0.37)]. Plate fixation significantly reduced the risk of nonunion, but intramedullary nail fixation did not. There was no difference in Constant-Murley or DASH scores between the 2 treatment groups or in the rate of secondary operative procedures.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients who undergo operative fixation of displaced middle-third clavicle fractures have a lower incidence of nonunion and symptomatic malunion. The clinical significance of this effect is uncertain, as functional scores were similar in both groups. Further research into the risk factors for nonunion and symptomatic malunion will be necessary to determine which patients benefit from operative fixation.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Variation of the clavicle's muscle insertion footprints - a cadaveric study

The muscle footprint anatomy of the clavicle is described in various anatomical textbooks but research on the footprint variation is rare. Our goal was to assess the variation and to create a probabilistic atlas of the muscle footprint anatomy. 14 right and left clavicles of anatomical specimens were dissected until only muscle fibers remained. 3D models with muscle footprints were made through CT scanning, laser scanning and photogrammetry. Then, for each side, the mean clavicle was calculated and non-rigidly registered to all other cadaveric bones. Muscle footprints were indicated on the mean left and right clavicle through the 1-to-1 mesh correspondence which is achieved by non-rigid registration. Lastly, 2 probabilistic atlases from the clavicle muscle footprints were generated. There was no statistical significant difference between the surface area (absolute and relative), of the originally dissected muscle footprints, of male and female, and left and right anatomical specimens. Visualization of all muscle footprints on the mean clavicle resulted in 72% (right) and 82% (left) coverage of the surface. The Muscle Insertion Footprint of each specimen covered on average 36.9% of the average right and 37.0% of the average left clavicle. The difference between surface coverage by all MIF and the mean surface coverage, shows that the MIF location varies strongly. From the probabilistic atlas we can conclude that no universal clavicle exists. Therefore, patient-specific clavicle fracture fixation plates should be considered to minimally interfere with the MIF. Therefore, patient-specific clavicle fracture fixation plates which minimally interfere with the footprints should be considered.

Early locking plate removal following open reduction and internal fixation of proximal humeral fractures could prevent secondary implant-related complications

Introduction

Proximal humeral fracture is a common cause of morbidity in the elderly and poses a challenge for the orthopedic surgeon. Open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) with a locking plate is associated with high rate of secondary implant-related complications (IRC). Early implant removal could potentially reduce the risk of IRC and further improve the outcome in relatively asymptomatic patients. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical and radiologic outcomes following implant removal.

Methods

A total of 56 patients with an average age of 63 ± 13 years and a mean follow-up of 29 months were evaluated retrospectively following removal of a locking plate in the proximal humerus. Postoperative functional outcomes were evaluated with the Constant-Score, Subjective shoulder value and Quick-DASH score.

Results

Early implant removal resulted in high functional outcomes with 96% of the patients reporting an improvement of their shoulder function following implant removal. No intraoperative complications were reported. Avascular necrosis (AVN) of the humeral head occurred in 12.5% of the patients, but no secondary screw cut-out was reported.

Conclusion

Early implant removal might be a safe option to avoid secondary IRC with significant subjective functional improvement also in asymptomatic patients. Although early implant removal cannot reverse the process of AVN, it could potentially prevent secondary IRC and subsequent glenohumeral cartilage destruction.

Why off-the-shelf clavicle plates rarely fit: anatomic analysis of the clavicle through statistical shape modeling

BACKGROUND

The clavicle presents a large variability in its characterizing sigmoid shape. Prominent and nonproperly fitting fixation plates (FP) cause soft tissue irritation and lead to hardware removal. It is therefore key in FP design to account for shape variations. Statistical shape models (SSMs) have been built to analyze a cluster of complex shapes. The goal of this study was to describe the anatomic variation of the clavicle using SSMs.

METHODS

Two different SSMs of the clavicle were created, and their modes of variation were described. One model contained 120 left male and female clavicles. The other model consisted of 76 left and corresponding right clavicles, 41 originating from men and 35 from women.

RESULTS

The model of 120 left clavicles showed that 10 modes of variation are necessary to explain 95% of the variation. The most important modes of variation are the clavicle length, inferior-superior bow, and medial and lateral curvature. Statistically significant differences between male and female clavicles were seen in length, sigmoid shape, and medial curvature. Comparison in men between left and right revealed significant differences in length and medial curvature. For women, a statistically significant difference between left and right was only seen in the length.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the operative treatment of displaced midshaft clavicular fractures has clear benefits, the variable anatomy of the clavicle often makes it challenging for the surgeon to make the plate fit adequately. Based on the identified variability in the clavicle's anatomy, it seems unlikely that a clavicle plating system can fit the entire population.

Midshaft clavicle fractures: Current concepts

Clavicle fractures are common fractures and the optimal treatment strategy remains debatable. The present paper reviews the available literature and current concepts in the management of displaced and/or shortened midshaft clavicle fractures.

Operative treatment leads to improved short-term functional outcomes, increased patient satisfaction, an earlier return to sports and lower rates of non-union compared with conservative treatment. In terms of cost-effectiveness, operative treatment also seems to be advantageous.

However, operative treatment is associated with an increased risk of complications and re-operations, while long-term shoulder functional outcomes are similar.

The optimal treatment strategy should be one tailor-made to the patient and his/her specific needs and expectations by utilizing a shared decision-making model.

Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2018;3:374-380. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.3.170033

Clavicula fractures: considerations when plating

The preferred treatment of clavicula midshaft fractures in adults has gone from being very conservative into surgery being frequently recommended. However, based on recent meta-analysis favorable outcome with internal fixation is not as consistent as previously reported. Probably due to a combination of indications for surgery becoming too wide and surgery being performed by a wider group of surgeons. When using plating for clavicula fractures there are several considerations to consider to improve outcome while reducing the risk for complications. Traditionally a horizontal approach along the clavicula is used as it provides good exposure. However, this incision is associated with a high risk for permanent anterior chest wall numbness that might be very disturbing for patients. A vertical incision can instead be used. Plates are traditionally placed in a superior position. An alternative can be an anterior-inferior position that allows better soft tissue coverage, less risk for hardware protrusion, longer screws can be used and the risk for damaging the underlying neurovascular bundle is reduced. Angle-stable screw-plate systems has not in a convincing way shown any benefit in clavicula fractures. In part because most patients have good bone quality where conventional screws will be sufficient.