1
|
Ritter D, Denard PJ, Raiss P, Wijdicks CA, Bachmaier S. Preoperative 3-dimensional computed tomography bone density measures provide objective bone quality classifications for stemless anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2024; 33:1503-1511. [PMID: 38182017 DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2023.11.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2023] [Revised: 10/26/2023] [Accepted: 11/12/2023] [Indexed: 01/07/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Reproducible methods for determining adequate bone densities for stemless anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (aTSA) are currently lacking. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the utility of preoperative computed tomography (CT) imaging for assessing the bone density of the proximal humerus for supportive differentiation in the decision making for stemless humeral component implantation. It was hypothesized that preoperative 3-dimensional (3-D) CT bone density measures provide objective classifications of the bone quality for stemless aTSA. METHODS A 3-part study was performed that included the analysis of cadaveric humerus CT scans followed by retrospective application to a clinical cohort and classification with a machine learning model. Thirty cadaveric humeri were evaluated with clinical CT and micro-CT (μCT) imaging. Phantom-calibrated CT data were used to extract 3-D regions of interest and defined radiographic scores. The final image processing script was applied retrospectively to a clinical cohort (n = 150) that had a preoperative CT and intraoperative bone density assessment using the "thumb test," followed by placement of an anatomic stemmed or stemless humeral component. Postscan patient-specific calibration was used to improve the functionality and accuracy of the density analysis. A machine learning model (Support vector machine [SVM]) was utilized to improve the classification of bone densities for a stemless humeral component. RESULTS The image processing of clinical CT images demonstrated good to excellent accuracy for cylindrical cancellous bone densities (metaphysis [ICC = 0.986] and epiphysis [ICC = 0.883]). Patient-specific internal calibration significantly reduced biases and unwanted variance compared with standard HU CT scans (P < .0001). The SVM showed optimized prediction accuracy compared with conventional statistics with an accuracy of 73.9% and an AUC of 0.83 based on the intraoperative decision of the surgeon. The SVM model based on density clusters increased the accuracy of the bone quality classification to 87.3% with an AUC of 0.93. CONCLUSIONS Preoperative CT imaging allows accurate evaluation of the bone densities in the proximal humerus. Three-dimensional regions of interest, rescaling using patient-specific calibration, and a machine learning model resulted in good to excellent prediction for objective bone quality classification. This approach may provide an objective tool extending preoperative selection criteria for stemless humeral component implantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Ritter
- Department of Orthopedic Research, Arthrex GmbH, Munich, Germany; Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, Musculoskeletal University Center Munich (MUM), University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
| | | | | | - Coen A Wijdicks
- Department of Orthopedic Research, Arthrex GmbH, Munich, Germany
| | - Samuel Bachmaier
- Department of Orthopedic Research, Arthrex GmbH, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Hayden A, Cotter EJ, Hennick T, Hetzel S, Wollaeger J, Anderson S, Grogan BF. Bone quality in total shoulder arthroplasty: a prospective study correlating computed tomography Hounsfield units with thumb test and fracture risk assessment tool score. JSES Int 2023; 7:628-635. [PMID: 37426930 PMCID: PMC10328770 DOI: 10.1016/j.jseint.2023.03.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Background To evaluate if Hounsfield units (HU) measured on preoperative computed tomography (CT) scans at the anatomic neck of the proximal humerus correlates with intraoperative findings of the "thumb test" in assessment of bone quality in shoulder arthroplasty patients. Methods Primary anatomic total shoulder and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty patients from 2019-2022 with an available preoperative CT scan of the operative shoulder were prospectively enrolled at a single center with 3 surgeons who perform shoulder arthroplasty. The "thumb test" was performed intraoperatively; a positive test signified "good bone." Demographic information, including prior dual x-ray absorptiometry scans, was extracted from the medical record. HU at the cut surface of the proximal humerus were calculated, as was cortical bone thickness on preoperative CT. Fracture risk assessment tool (FRAX) scores were calculated for 10-year risk of osteoporotic fracture. Results A total of 149 patients were enrolled. Mean age was 67.6 ± 8.5 years with 69 (46.3%) being males. Patients with a negative thumb test were significantly older (72.3 ± 6.6 vs. 66.5 ± 8.6 years; P < .001) than those with a positive thumb test. Males were more likely to have a positive thumb test than females (P = .014). Patients with a negative thumb test had significantly lower HUs on preoperative CT (16.3 ± 29.7 vs. 51.9 ± 35.2; P < .001). Patients with a negative thumb test had a higher mean FRAX score (14.1 ± 7.9 vs. 8.0 ± 4.8; P < .001). Receiver operator curve analysis was performed to identify a cut-off value for CT HU of 36.67, above which the thumb test is likely to be positive. Furthermore, receiver operator curve analysis also identified optimal cut-off values for 10-year risk of fracture by FRAX score of 7.75 HU, below which the thumb test is likely to be positive. Fifty patients were at high risk based on FRAX and HU; surgeons classified 21 (42%) as having "poor bone" quality through a negative thumb test. High-risk patients had a negative thumb test 33.8% (23/68) and 37.1% (26/71) of the time for HU and FRAX, respectively. Conclusions Surgeons are poor at identifying suboptimal bone quality at the anatomic neck of the proximal humerus based on intraoperative thumb test when referencing against CT HU and FRAX scores. The objective measures of CT HU and FRAX scoring may be useful metrics to incorporate into surgeons' preoperative plans for humeral stem fixation using readily available imaging and demographic data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander Hayden
- Department of Orthopedics and Rehabilitation, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Eric J. Cotter
- Department of Orthopedics and Rehabilitation, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Terah Hennick
- Department of Orthopedics and Rehabilitation, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Scott Hetzel
- Department of Biostatistics and Medical Informatics, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA
| | - John Wollaeger
- Department of Orthopedics and Rehabilitation, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Scott Anderson
- Department of Orthopedics and Rehabilitation, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Brian F. Grogan
- Department of Orthopedics and Rehabilitation, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Reeves JM, Vanasse T, Roche C, Faber KJ, Langohr GDG. Initial Assessments of a Handheld Indentation Probe's Correlation With Cancellous Bone Density, Stiffness, and Strength: An Objective Alternative to “Thumb Testing”. J Med Device 2021. [DOI: 10.1115/1.4052305] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Objective: During shoulder arthroplasty, surgeons must select the optimal implant for each patient. The metaphyseal bone properties affect this decision; however, the typical resection “thumb test” lacks objectivity. This investigation's purposes were to determine the correlation strength between the indentation depth of a handheld mechanism and the density, compressive strength, and modulus of a bone surrogate; as well as to assess how changing the indenter tip shape and impact energy may affect the correlation strengths. Methods: A spring-loaded indenter was developed. Four tip shapes (needle, tapered, flat, and radiused cylinders) and four spring energies (0.13 J–0.76J) were assessed by indenting five cellular foam bone surrogates of varying density, every five times. After each indentation, the indentation depth was measured with a separate probe and correlated with manufacturer specifications of the apparent density, compressive strength, and modulus. Results: indentation depth plateaued as the bone surrogate's material properties increased, particularly for indentation tips with larger footprints and the 0.13 J spring. All tip shapes produced strong (R2≥0.7) power-law relationships between the indentation depth metric and the bone surrogate's material properties (density: 0.70 ≤ R2 ≤ 0.95, strength: 0.75 ≤ R2 ≤ 0.97, modulus: 0.70 ≤ R2 ≤ 0.93); though the use of the needle tip yielded the widest indentation depth scale. Interpretation: these strong correlations suggest that a handheld indenter may provide objective intra-operative evidence of cancellous material properties. Further investigations are warranted to study indenter tip shape and spring energy in human tissue; though the needle tip with spring energy between 0.30 J and 0.76 J seems the most promising.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacob M. Reeves
- Department of Mechanical and Materials Engineering, The University of Western Ontario, London, ON N6A 3K7, Canada
| | | | | | - Kenneth J. Faber
- Roth
- McFarlane Hand and Upper Limb Centre, London, ON N6A 4V2, Canada
| | - G. Daniel G. Langohr
- Department of Mechanical and Materials Engineering, The University of Western Ontario, London, ON N6A 3K7, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Synnott S, Langohr GDG, Reeves JM, Johnson JA, Athwal GS. The effect of humeral implant thickness and canal fill on interface contact and bone stresses in the proximal humerus. JSES Int 2021; 5:881-888. [PMID: 34505100 PMCID: PMC8411059 DOI: 10.1016/j.jseint.2021.05.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Stem size is an important element for successful time zero primary fixation of a press-fit humeral stem in shoulder arthroplasty. Little basic science research, however, has been conducted on the effects of implant thickness and canal fill on load transfer, contact, and stress shielding. The purpose of this finite element study was to determine the effects of varying stem thickness on bone contact, bone stresses, and bone resorption owing to stress shielding. Methods Three generic short-stem implant models were developed and varied based on cross-sectional thickness (thinner - 8 mm, medium - 12 mm, thicker - 16 mm). Using a finite element model, three outcome measures were determined (1) the amount of bone-to-implant contact, (2) changes in cortical and trabecular bone stresses from the intact state, and (3) changes in cortical and trabecular strain energy densities which can predict bone remodeling or stress shielding. Results Increasing the size of the humeral stem had no significant effects on bone-to-implant contact during loading (P > .07). The thinner implant with the lowest canal fill ratio produced significantly lower changes in stress from the intact state in both cortical and trabecular bone (P < .002). In addition, the thinner implant resulted in a substantially lower volume of bone predicted to stress shield and resorb when compared with the medium and thicker stems. Discussion The results demonstrate that thinner implants and lower canal fill may be beneficial over thicker sizes, provided equal initial fixation can be achieved. The thinner implant has a greater degree of load sharing and increases the mechanical load placed on surrounding bone, reducing the risk of stress shielding and bone resorption.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie Synnott
- Roth
- McFarlane Hand and Upper Limb Center Biomechanics Laboratory, London, ON, Canada
| | - G Daniel G Langohr
- Roth
- McFarlane Hand and Upper Limb Center Biomechanics Laboratory, London, ON, Canada
| | - Jacob M Reeves
- Roth
- McFarlane Hand and Upper Limb Center Biomechanics Laboratory, London, ON, Canada
| | - James A Johnson
- Roth
- McFarlane Hand and Upper Limb Center Biomechanics Laboratory, London, ON, Canada
| | - George S Athwal
- Roth
- McFarlane Hand and Upper Limb Center Biomechanics Laboratory, London, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Rasmussen JV, Harjula J, Arverud ED, Hole R, Jensen SL, Brorson S, Fenstad AM, Salomonsson B, Äärimaa V. The short-term survival of total stemless shoulder arthroplasty for osteoarthritis is comparable to that of total stemmed shoulder arthroplasty: a Nordic Arthroplasty Register Association study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2019; 28:1578-1586. [PMID: 31043348 DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2019.01.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/22/2018] [Revised: 12/21/2018] [Accepted: 01/06/2019] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The purpose of this study was to compare the short-term survival rate of total stemless, metaphyseal fixated, shoulder arthroplasty with that of total stemmed shoulder arthroplasty in the treatment of osteoarthritis. METHODS Data were collected by the national arthroplasty registries in Denmark, Finland, Norway, and Sweden and merged into 1 dataset under the umbrella of the Nordic Arthroplasty Register Association. For the present study, we included all patients with osteoarthritis treated with either stemless (n = 761) or stemmed (n = 4398) shoulder arthroplasty from 2011 to 2016. RESULTS A total of 21 (2.8%) stemless and 116 (2.6%) stemmed shoulder arthroplasties were revised. The 6-year unadjusted cumulative survival rates were 0.953 for stemless shoulder arthroplasty and 0.958 for stemmed shoulder arthroplasty, P = .77. The most common indication for revision of both arthroplasty types was infection. Five (0.7%) stemless and 16 (0.4%) stemmed shoulder arthroplasties were revised because of loosening of either the glenoid or the humeral component. In the multivariate cox regression model, which included age, category, gender, year of surgery, previous surgery, and arthroplasty type, the hazard ratio (HR) for revision of the stemless shoulder arthroplasty was 1.00 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.63-1.61), P = .99, with the stemmed shoulder arthroplasty as reference. Male gender (HR = 1.50 [95% CI, 1.06-2.13], P = .02) and previous surgery (HR = 2.70 [95% CI, 1.82-4.01], P < .001) were associated with increased risk of revision. CONCLUSION The short-term survival of total stemless shoulder arthroplasty appears comparable with total stemmed shoulder arthroplasty, but longer observation time is needed to confirm whether they continue to perform equally.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeppe V Rasmussen
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Herlev Hospital, Herlev, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
| | - Jenni Harjula
- Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Turku University and University Hospital, Turku, Finland
| | - Erica D Arverud
- Department of Orthopedics, Karolinska Institutet, Danderyds Sjukhus AB, Danderyd, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Randi Hole
- Norwegian Arthroplasty Register, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| | - Steen L Jensen
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Aalborg, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Stig Brorson
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Zealand University Hospital, Køge, Denmark
| | - Anne Marie Fenstad
- Norwegian Arthroplasty Register, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| | - Björn Salomonsson
- Department of Orthopedics, Karolinska Institutet, Danderyds Sjukhus AB, Danderyd, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Ville Äärimaa
- Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Turku University and University Hospital, Turku, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Reeves JM, Langohr GDG, Athwal GS, Johnson JA. The effect of stemless humeral component fixation feature design on bone stress and strain response: a finite element analysis. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2018; 27:2232-2241. [PMID: 30104100 DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2018.06.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2018] [Revised: 05/26/2018] [Accepted: 06/02/2018] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Since the advent of stemless implants, several different fixation feature designs have been used to improve primary implant stability. These stemless designs are diverse, and the rationale for their selection and design has not been thoroughly studied. Accordingly, this investigation assessed the effect of stemless implant geometry on the simulated stress and strain response of the proximal humerus. METHODS Five humeral finite element models were used to examine 10 generic stemless implants with variable fixation features (2 central, 4 peripheral, and 4 boundary crossing). Loads representing 45° and 75° of shoulder abduction were simulated. Implants were compared based on the percentage of implant-bone surface area that remained in contact, the change in bone stress relative to the intact state, and the simulated potential for bone to resorb, remodel, or remain unchanged after reconstruction. RESULTS The implant-bone contact area was greatest for peripheral, followed by central and boundary-crossing designs. All implants elicited similar bone stress variations, which were greatest 0 to 5 mm beneath the resection and laterally. The simulated potential cortical response was also similar for all implants, with the greatest simulated resorbing potential 0 to 15 mm beneath the resection, and very little expected remodeling. Differences between implants were most prominent within the simulated potential trabecular response, with the central implants having the least bone volume percentage expected to resorb. CONCLUSIONS Simulated humeral bone response after stemless anatomic shoulder replacement depends on fixation feature geometry. Trade-offs exist between implant types. Centrally pegged implants produced the lowest simulated resorbing potential, whereas peripheral implants had the greatest percentages of implant-bone contact area.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacob M Reeves
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, The University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada; The Roth
- McFarlane Hand and Upper Limb Centre, St. Joseph's Hospital, London, ON, Canada
| | - G Daniel G Langohr
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, The University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada; The Roth
- McFarlane Hand and Upper Limb Centre, St. Joseph's Hospital, London, ON, Canada
| | - George S Athwal
- The Roth
- McFarlane Hand and Upper Limb Centre, St. Joseph's Hospital, London, ON, Canada; Department of Surgery, The University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada
| | - James A Johnson
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, The University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada; The Roth
- McFarlane Hand and Upper Limb Centre, St. Joseph's Hospital, London, ON, Canada; Department of Surgery, The University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada; Department of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|