Arthroscopic versus open release of internal rotation contracture in the obstetrical brachial plexus paralysis (OBPP) sequela

Comparing the Results of Latissimus Dorsi Versus Teres Major Transfer in Children With Obstetric Brachial Plexus Injury and Residual Shoulder Sequelae

BACKGROUND

Obstetric brachial plexus injury (OBPI) remains a fairly common problem in newborns despite the improved obstetric care. Children who do not show complete recovery often present with residual shoulder deformity of limited external rotation and abduction. Secondary interventions in the form of tendon transfer and soft tissue release are aimed at correcting the implicated muscular imbalance to restore shoulder function.

AIM

The aim of this work was to compare the results of latissimus dorsi versus teres major tendon transfer in patients with OBPI with limited shoulder external rotation.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This study included 40 patients admitted to El Hadara University Hospital with OBPI and limited shoulder abduction and external rotation aged between 1.5 and 4 years. Half of the patients had a latissimus dorsi transfer, and the other half, a teres major one. Children with limited preoperative passive external rotation in both groups required a subscapularis slide. Patients were evaluated preoperatively, at 6 months, and 12 months postoperatively using the Gilbert scale.

RESULTS

Teres major tendon transfer showed better results in restoring limited shoulder abduction and external rotation than latissimus dorsi transfer. Limited shoulder internal rotation was the main complication occurring postoperatively. Loss of the last degree of internal rotation occurred in most patients who had subscapularis slide. Most patients regained functional midline abilities with physiotherapy and required no further interventions.

CONCLUSIONS

Isolated teres major transfer has shown better results in improving the range of external rotation and abduction compared with isolated latissimus dorsi tendon transfer. Age of the patients did not affect the overall final improvement in shoulder range of motion. Limited internal rotation is the main complication postoperatively, which was prevalent in patients who required a subscapularis slide but was not statistically significant.

Comparison of latissimus dorsi tendon transfer with subscapularis release versus sliding of internal rotation contracture in obstetrical brachial plexus paralysis sequela

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to compare the functional results of latissimus dorsi (LD) tendon transfer with those of subscapularis (SS) muscle release versus sliding.

METHODS

Fifty-six patients with internal rotation contracture and external rotation (ER) weakness as sequelae of Erb's palsy were included in the study. Of the patients, 24 were included in group 1 (11 boys and 13 girls), with a mean age of 2 years 8 months (range 1.5-5 years) and a follow-up period of 62 months (range 38-68 months). The patients in group 1 underwent LD tendon transfer, with internal rotation contracture and SS release procedures. Thirty-two patients were included in group 2 (18 boys and 14 girls), with a mean age of 2 years 6 months (range 1.5-4.8 years) and a follow-up period of 58 months (range 38-68 months). The patients in group 2 underwent LD tendon transfer with SS sliding.

RESULTS

A significant improvement in preoperative passive ER from - 3.6° to 67.3° after operation was observed in group 1. In group 2, preoperative passive ER in adduction improved from 0° to 72.3°. We found no significant difference (P = 0.1) in postoperative improvement in active ER in both groups (group 1 vs. group 2: 75° vs. 77.3°). Similarly, no significant difference (P = 0.7) in postoperative improvement in passive ER was found between the groups (group 1 vs. group 2: 71° vs. 72.3°).

CONCLUSIONS

LD tendon transfer with SS release or sliding is an effective procedure to improve shoulder ER in patients with OBPP, with no inferiority of SS muscle release or sliding for internal rotation contractures and increased passive range of shoulder motion.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III; Retrospective Cohort Comparison; Treatment Study.

Effect of arthroscopic shoulder release on shoulder mobility and bone deformity following brachial plexus birth injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Specific information to guide clinical practice is lacking for the effects of arthroscopic release on bone and joint deformities, as well as the additional benefits of tendon transfer, in children with brachial plexus birth injury. The aims of this study were (1) to evaluate changes in shoulder mobility and bone and joint deformity, (2) to evaluate the effect of release with and without tendon transfer on the same outcomes, and (3) to evaluate the perioperative and long-term complications.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis. Four databases were searched using relevant inclusion and exclusion criteria from inception until May 2020. The quality of articles was evaluated using the Methodological Index for Non-randomized Studies (MINORS) scale. Data regarding patients, interventions, and clinical and radiologic outcomes were reported.

RESULTS

Thirteen articles were included: 6 of low quality and 7 of moderate quality separated into 17 studies (266 children). The mean follow-up duration was 32.4 months (standard deviation, 15.2 months). Arthroscopic release significantly improved the Mallet score (standardized mean difference [SMD], 3.1 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.5-4.7]; P < .001) and passive external rotation (SMD, 3.6 [95% CI, 2.3-4.9]; P = .02). The percentage of humeral head anterior (SMD, 1.3 [95% CI, 0.7-1.9]; P = .003) and glenoid retroversion (SMD, 1.4 [95% CI, 0.9-2]; P = .01) also improved. Descriptive analysis of the data suggested that concomitant tendon transfer further improved mobility. Recurrence of internal-rotation contracture was reported in 8 of 157 children.

DISCUSSION

This systematic review showed that arthroscopic release effectively improves both shoulder mobility and bone deformity, with few complications in young children with brachial plexus birth injury. As such, it seems reasonable to propose a stepwise approach starting with a release without transfer.

Shoulder internal rotation contracture in brachial plexus birth injury: proximal or distal subscapularis release?

BACKGROUND

In cases of brachial plexus birth injury with internal rotation contracture of the shoulder, the subscapularis muscle may be released proximally, from the subscapular fossa, or distally, along with periarticular soft tissues arthroscopic to the glenohumeral joint. We hypothesized that the indication for each procedure would rely primarily on patients' bone remodeling potential and periarticular soft-tissue contractures, performing proximal releases in patients aged < 4 years and periarticular distal releases in older patients. The purpose of this study was to analyze the outcomes such a strategy could provide.

METHODS

All patients presenting with brachial plexus birth injury-related shoulder internal rotation contractures who underwent a subscapularis release were included; in addition, to restore the joint axial balance, the infraspinatus was systematically reanimated with a tendon transfer (ie, latissimus dorsi or lower trapezius) during the same operating time. Chart review yielded preoperative and postoperative clinical and radiographic measurements, including active and passive range of motion of the shoulder in external rotation (ER) with the arm at the side of the body, the modified Mallet score, glenoid version, and the percentage of the humeral head arthroscopic to the middle of the glenoid process.

RESULTS

Between July 2012 and January 2018, 28 children were operated on at our institution. In patients who underwent proximal subscapularis release (n = 13), significant improvements were observed regarding active shoulder ER, passive shoulder ER, the modified Mallet score, glenoid version, and the percentage of the humeral head arthroscopic to the middle of the glenoid process, averaging 58° ± 32° (P < .0001), 56° ± 20° (P < .0001), 9.7 ± 3.1 points (P = .0006), 15° ± 10° (P = .0034), and 24% ± 20% (P = .0113), respectively, after a mean follow-up period of 4 years. Following distal release procedures (n = 15), these improvements averaged 26° ± 29° (P = .0024), 27° ± 28° (P = .0011), 3.3 ± 4.1 points (P = .0049), 2° ± 17° (P = .4086), and 4% ± 18% (P = .215), respectively, after a mean follow-up period of 3 years.

CONCLUSION

When combined with axial rebalancing of the joint, the proximal release of the subscapularis muscle appears to be sufficient to provide satisfactory functional outcomes in patients with great bone remodeling potential and supple periarticular soft tissues. In older patients, a more comprehensive release of the glenohumeral joint's arthroscopic aspect seems to provide lower but still significant clinical improvements.