1
|
Vegas A, Cannon D, Lewis S, Mekkawy KL, Glener J, Rodriguez HC, Schodlbauer D, Levy JC. Functional and radiographic results of anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty in the setting of subscapularis dysfunction: 5-year outcomes analysis. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2024; 33:e79-e87. [PMID: 37473908 DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2023.06.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2023] [Revised: 05/10/2023] [Accepted: 06/06/2023] [Indexed: 07/22/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Subscapularis management is a critical component to the success of anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA). Failure to heal the subscapularis can result in pain, weakness, loss of function, and revision. However, not all patients have poor outcomes. The purpose of this study is to compare patients with normal and dysfunctional subscapularis function following TSA in regard to (1) patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs); (2) range of motion (ROM) and strength; (3) achievement of minimal clinically important differences (MCIDs); and (4) specific functional internal rotation tasks. METHODS A retrospective review of patients treated with TSA for osteoarthritis with a minimum 2-year follow-up was performed to identify patients with subscapularis dysfunction. Subscapularis dysfunction was diagnosed when any degree of weakness in internal rotation was detected on physical examination (positive belly press sign). These patients were case controlled matched on a 1:3 ratio to patients with normal subscapularis function based on age and sex. PROMs, measured active motion, revision rates, patient satisfaction, and postoperative radiographic findings were compared. Population-specific institutional anchor-based MCID values were used to compare the improvement in PROM. RESULTS Of the 668 patients included, 34 patients (5.1%) demonstrated evidence of subscapularis dysfunction. Mean follow-up for the normal subscapularis function cohort was 63.4 ± 29.7 and 58.7 ± 26.8 for the dysfunctional subscapularis cohort. Patients with subscapularis dysfunction demonstrated significantly worse postoperative Simple Shoulder Test, Single Assessment Numerical Evaluation, visual analog scale (VAS) function, VAS pain, and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form (ASES) scores with higher rates of unsatisfactory results when compared to patients with normal subscapularis function. Abduction, elevation, internal rotation ROM, along with supraspinatus and external rotation strength were also significantly worse in the dysfunctional group. Similarly, these patients were more likely to have decreased ability to perform functional internal rotation tasks, with only 47% of the patients being able to reach the small of their back compared to 85% with normal subscapularis function. Radiographically, the dysfunctional cohort demonstrated higher rates of anterior subluxation (56% vs. 7%; P < .001) and glenoid loosening (24% vs. 5%; P = .004). Similarly, revision rates were significantly higher for patients with subscapularis dysfunction (8 patients, 23.5%). Nonetheless, the dysfunctional subscapularis cohort demonstrated improvements in VAS pain (4.0 ± 3.7) and ASES (46.4 ± 35.9) scores that exceeded MCID thresholds. CONCLUSION Patients who develop subscapularis dysfunction after TSA have significantly worse PROMs, ROM, functional tasks of internal rotation, and radiographic outcomes, as well as increased rates of revision. Although patients show worse outcomes and high revision rates compared with their normal-functioning counterparts, these patients maintained improvement above MCID thresholds for pain and function at a mean 5-year follow-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Austin Vegas
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Larkin Community Hospital, South Miami, FL, USA
| | - Dylan Cannon
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK, USA
| | - Steven Lewis
- Holy Cross Orthopedic Institute, Fort Lauderdale, FL, USA
| | | | - Julie Glener
- Holy Cross Orthopedic Institute, Fort Lauderdale, FL, USA
| | - Hugo C Rodriguez
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Larkin Community Hospital, South Miami, FL, USA
| | - Daniel Schodlbauer
- Levy Shoulder Center at Paley Orthopedic and Spine Institute, Boca Raton, FL, USA
| | - Jonathan C Levy
- Levy Shoulder Center at Paley Orthopedic and Spine Institute, Boca Raton, FL, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Pasqualini I, Menendez ME, Ardebol J, Denard PJ. Lesser Tuberosity Osteotomy for the Management of the Subscapularis During Total Shoulder Arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2023; 31:1120-1127. [PMID: 37506312 DOI: 10.5435/jaaos-d-22-01093] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2022] [Accepted: 06/23/2023] [Indexed: 07/30/2023] Open
Abstract
Subscapularis integrity is critical after anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty, with failure leading to potential instability, loss of function, and revision surgery. The three well-described subscapularis mobilization techniques during total shoulder arthroplasty include tenotomy, peel, and lesser tuberosity osteotomy (LTO). While several comparative studies exist, the optimal approach remains controversial. LTO has been associated with the highest healing rates, but techniques and repair constructs are highly variable. The purpose of this article was to provide an overview of LTO with attention on radiographic assessment, repair options, and clinical outcomes.
Collapse
|
3
|
Ardebol J, Pak T, Kiliç AĪ, Hwang S, Menendez ME, Denard PJ. Secondary Rotator Cuff Insufficiency After Anatomic Total Shoulder Arthroplasty. JBJS Rev 2023; 11:01874474-202309000-00005. [PMID: 37729463 DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.rvw.23.00099] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/22/2023]
Abstract
» Secondary rotator cuff insufficiency is a challenging complication after anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty.» Acute tears may be amenable to open or arthroscopic repair in some instances.» Chronic attritional tears are best managed with revision to reverse shoulder arthroplasty, especially in the elderly.» Increased glenoid inclination, larger critical shoulder angle, oversized humeral components, thicker glenoid components, and rotator cuff muscle fatty infiltration have all shown to contribute to tear risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Ali Īhsan Kiliç
- Oregon Shoulder Institute, Medford, Oregon
- Izmir Bakircay University, Izmir, Turkey
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Dillon MT, Beleckas CM, Navarro RA. Techniques for Managing the Subscapularis and Addressing Failures of the Tendon in Anatomic Total Shoulder Arthroplasty. Orthopedics 2023; 46:e264-e272. [PMID: 37216563 DOI: 10.3928/01477447-20230517-01] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/24/2023]
Abstract
Anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (aTSA) is an accepted treatment for a variety of degenerative conditions of the glenohumeral joint. The manner in which the subscapularis tendon is handled during the approach in aTSA is not universally agreed on. Failure of the repair after aTSA has been shown to be associated with poorer outcomes in some cases. There is no consensus on how to treat failures, as all techniques described in the literature demonstrate shortcomings. The purpose of this review is to evaluate the methods of handling the tendon in aTSA and to review options for treating failure following surgery. [Orthopedics. 2023;46(5):e264-e272.].
Collapse
|
5
|
Ahmed AF, T Kreulen R, Mikula J, Nayar SK, Miller AS, McFarland EG, Srikumaran U. Subscapularis management in anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. Shoulder Elbow 2023; 15:15-24. [PMID: 37692870 PMCID: PMC10492525 DOI: 10.1177/17585732221114816] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2022] [Revised: 06/08/2022] [Accepted: 07/02/2022] [Indexed: 09/12/2023]
Abstract
Background This systematic review and network meta-analysis compare clinical outcomes of three different subscapularis management techniques in anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty: lesser tuberosity osteotomy, subscapularis peel, and subscapularis tenotomy. Methods PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane's trial registry were searched in July 2021. Comparative studies and case series evaluating the outcomes of these three techniques were included. The network meta-analysis was performed only on comparative studies. Results Twenty-three studies were included. Both lesser tuberosity osteotomy and subscapularis peel had significantly higher Western Ontario Osteoarthritis Scores compared to subscapularis tenotomy, but no difference in American Shoulder and Elbow Society Scores. Subscapularis peel had superior external rotation compared to lesser tuberosity osteotomy. However, no difference was found in external rotation between subscapularis peel and subscapularis tenotomy or between subscapularis tenotomy and lesser tuberosity osteotomy. The overall weighted average for lesser tuberosity osteotomy bony union was 93.6%, whereas the overall weighted average for subscapularis tendon healing was 79.4% and 87% for subscapularis tenotomy and subscapularis peel, respectively. Discussion This network meta-analysis demonstrated that lesser tuberosity osteotomy and subscapularis peel were associated with the high union and subscapularis healing rates and may be associated with improved shoulder function and quality of life, compared to subscapularis tenotomy. Lesser tuberosity osteotomy and subscapularis peel demonstrate a trend of superior outcomes compared to subscapularis tenotomy during anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abdulaziz F Ahmed
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Howard County General Hospital, Columbia, MD, USA
| | - Randall T Kreulen
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Howard County General Hospital, Columbia, MD, USA
| | - Jacob Mikula
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Howard County General Hospital, Columbia, MD, USA
| | - Suresh K Nayar
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Howard County General Hospital, Columbia, MD, USA
| | - Andrew S Miller
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Howard County General Hospital, Columbia, MD, USA
| | - Edward G McFarland
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Howard County General Hospital, Columbia, MD, USA
| | - Uma Srikumaran
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Howard County General Hospital, Columbia, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Lesser Tuberosity Osteotomy Healing in Stemmed and Stemless Anatomic Shoulder Arthroplasty Is Higher with a Tensionable Construct and Affected by Body Mass Index and Tobacco Use. J Clin Med 2023; 12:jcm12030834. [PMID: 36769482 PMCID: PMC9918114 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12030834] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2022] [Revised: 01/16/2023] [Accepted: 01/19/2023] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study compared the healing rates of lesser tuberosity osteotomy (LTO) for anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA), repaired with either standard knot tying or a tensionable construct. Second, we evaluated LTO healing in stemmed and stemless prostheses and identified the patient characteristics associated with healing. METHODS An analysis of consecutive primary TSAs approached with an LTO performed by a single surgeon between 2016 and 2020 was conducted. In the first two years of the study period, the LTOs were repaired with four #2 polyblend sutures passed through drill tunnels and around a short press-fit stem, followed by manual knot tying. Subsequently, a tensionable construct with suture tapes (TCB) was universally adopted. The radiographic appearance of the LTO was evaluated at a minimum of six months postoperatively. RESULTS A total of 340 patients met the study criteria, including 168 with manual knot tying, 84 TCB repairs with a stemmed implant, and 88 TCB repairs with a stemless implant. There was no difference in the baseline demographics between the groups. The LTO healing rate of the manual knot tying group (85%) was lower than that of the stemmed (95%) and stemless (98%) TCB groups (p < 0.001). When directly comparing the LTO healing between the stemmed and stemless TCB groups, the differences were not significant (p = 0.44). Across all constructs, the body mass index (BMI) was higher in the displaced nonunion group (p = 0.04), with a failure rate of 9.4% for a BMI between 30 and 40, 12.5% for a BMI between 40 and 50, and 28.6% for a BMI > 50. The rate of tobacco use was higher in the displaced nonunion group (p = 0.037). CONCLUSION A tensionable construct improves LTO healing compared to manual knot tying, irrespective of the implant type. In addition to the surgical technique, the patient factors that influence tuberosity healing include a greater BMI and tobacco use. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level III, retrospective comparative study.
Collapse
|
7
|
Baisi LP, Athwal GS, Pollock JW, Zhang T, Hodgdon T, McIlquham K, Lapner P. Ultrasound-determined healing rates with subscapularis tenotomy versus peel after anatomic shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2023; 32:96-103. [PMID: 35973515 DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2022.07.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2022] [Revised: 06/16/2022] [Accepted: 07/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Several techniques have been described for mobilizing the subscapularis tendon in anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA). The purpose of this study was to compare subscapularis tendon healing rates, as determined by ultrasound, in patients following anatomic TSA with either a subscapularis tenotomy or subscapularis peel. METHODS This study was a secondary analysis of patients from a previous randomized controlled trial in which patients underwent anatomic TSA and were randomized to either a tenotomy or peel approach. The primary outcome was postoperative tendon healing rates determined on ultrasound at >12 months after surgery. Secondary outcomes included postoperative tendon thickness measured on ultrasound; elbow position (neutral alignment in the belly-press position vs. posterior); internal rotation function measured with the third and fourth questions of the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons questionnaire; and Western Ontario Osteoarthritis of the Shoulder index. Radiographs were analyzed in patients with torn tendons. RESULTS One hundred patients were randomized to a tenotomy (n = 47) or peel (n = 53) approach. Postoperative ultrasound results were available in 88 patients. Tendon healing rates were 95% for tenotomy vs. 75% for peel (P = .011). The mean postoperative tendon thickness was 4 mm (standard deviation, 1.0 mm) and 4 mm (standard deviation, 1 mm) in the tenotomy and peel groups, respectively (P = .37). Internal rotation function was not associated with healing status (P = .77 and P = .22 for questions 3 and 4, respectively, of the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons questionnaire), nor was elbow position (P = .2) in the belly-press position. DISCUSSION We observed that subscapularis tenotomy had a higher healing rate than peel as determined by ultrasound in TSA patients. There was no statistically significant difference in postoperative tendon thickness in intact tendons as measured on ultrasound when comparing subscapularis mobilization techniques, nor was there any association between healing status and internal rotation function or elbow position.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Louis-Philippe Baisi
- Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, ON, Canada; Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - George S Athwal
- Roth
- McFarlane Hand and Upper Limb Centre, St. Joseph's Health Care London, London, ON, Canada; Western University, London, ON, Canada
| | - J Whitcomb Pollock
- Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, ON, Canada; Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Tinghua Zhang
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Taryn Hodgdon
- Department of Medical Imaging, The Ottawa Hospital, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Katie McIlquham
- Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Peter Lapner
- Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, ON, Canada; Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Management of Subscapularis Insufficiency After Total Shoulder Arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2022; 30:933-940. [PMID: 36037282 DOI: 10.5435/jaaos-d-22-00222] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2022] [Accepted: 05/22/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
The functional success of anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) relies heavily on the healing integrity of the subscapularis tendon. Access to the glenohumeral joint is performed through a deltopectoral approach, and takedown of the subscapularis tendon is necessary in most surgeons' hands. Although initially described as a tenotomy, lesser tuberosity osteotomy and subscapularis peel are two techniques more commonly used today. Both of these options offer good results as long as proper repair is done. A subscapularis-sparing approach has more recently been advocated but is technically demanding. Failure of tendon repair can lead to early failure of anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty with accelerated glenoid loosening, decreased function, and anterior instability. Treatment options for subscapularis insufficiency include nonsurgical management, revision tendon repair, tendon reconstruction or transfer, or conversion to reverse shoulder arthroplasty. As shoulder arthroplasty continues to become increasingly prevalent, subscapularis insufficiency, too, will become more common. Accordingly, a surgeon's knowledge of subscapularis management in an arthroplasty setting must encompass treatment options for postoperative subscapularis insufficiency.
Collapse
|
9
|
Romero BA, Horneff JG. Soft Tissue Management in Shoulder Arthroplasty. Orthop Clin North Am 2022; 53:339-347. [PMID: 35725042 DOI: 10.1016/j.ocl.2022.02.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
Total shoulder arthroplasty is a rapidly growing field, with more procedures performed each year. An important aspect of shoulder arthroplasty surgery is the management of soft tissues. Good functional outcomes in shoulder arthroplasty are significantly dependent on the repair of the rotator cuff tendons and proper release of the shoulder capsule. The success of any shoulder arthroplasty is predicated upon the meticulous handling of these tissues. The surgeon's ability to execute appropriate soft tissue techniques will facilitate easier surgery by increasing exposure and lead to better outcomes for the patient.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - John Gabriel Horneff
- University of Pennsylvania, 3737 Market Street 6th Floor, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Kolin DA, Moverman MA, Pagani NR, Puzzitiello RN, Dubin J, Menendez ME, Jawa A, Kirsch JM. Substantial Inconsistency and Variability Exists Among Minimum Clinically Important Differences for Shoulder Arthroplasty Outcomes: A Systematic Review. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2022; 480:1371-1383. [PMID: 35302970 PMCID: PMC9191322 DOI: 10.1097/corr.0000000000002164] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2021] [Accepted: 02/11/2022] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND As the value of patient-reported outcomes becomes increasingly recognized, minimum clinically important difference (MCID) thresholds have seen greater use in shoulder arthroplasty. However, MCIDs are unique to certain populations, and variation in the modes of calculation in this field may be of concern. With the growing utilization of MCIDs within the field and value-based care models, a detailed appraisal of the appropriateness of MCID use in the literature is necessary and has not been systematically reviewed. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES We performed a systematic review of MCID quantification in existing studies on shoulder arthroplasty to answer the following questions: (1) What is the range of values reported for the MCID in commonly used shoulder arthroplasty patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs)? (2) What percentage of studies use previously existing MCIDs versus calculating a new MCID? (3) What techniques for calculating the MCID were used in studies where a new MCID was calculated? METHODS The Embase, PubMed, and Ovid/MEDLINE databases were queried from December 2008 through December 2020 for total shoulder arthroplasty and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty articles reporting an MCID value for various PROMs. Two reviewers (DAK, MAM) independently screened articles for eligibility, specifically identifying articles that reported MCID values for PROMs after shoulder arthroplasty, and extracted data for analysis. Each study was classified into two categories: those referencing a previously defined MCID and those using a newly calculated MCID. Methods for determining the MCID for each study and the variability of reported MCIDs for each PROM were recorded. The number of patients, age, gender, BMI, length of follow-up, surgical indications, and surgical type were extracted for each article. Forty-three articles (16,408 patients) with a mean (range) follow-up of 20 months (0.75 to 68) met the inclusion criteria. The median (range) BMI of patients was 29.3 kg/m2 (28.0 to 32.2 kg/m2), and the median (range) age was 68 years (53 to 84). There were 17 unique PROMs with MCID values. Of the 112 MCIDs reported, the most common PROMs with MCIDs were the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) (23% [26 of 112]), the Simple Shoulder Test (SST) (17% [19 of 112]), and the Constant (15% [17 of 112]). RESULTS The ranges of MCID values for each PROM varied widely (ASES: 6.3 to 29.5; SST: 1.4 to 4.0; Constant: -0.3 to 12.8). Fifty-six percent (24 of 43) of studies used previously established MCIDs, with 46% (11 of 24) citing one study. Forty-four percent (19 of 43) of studies established new MCIDs, and the most common technique was anchor-based (37% [7 of 19]), followed by distribution (21% [4 of 19]). CONCLUSION There is substantial inconsistency and variability in the quantification and reporting of MCID values in shoulder arthroplasty studies. Many shoulder arthroplasty studies apply previously published MCID values with variable ranges of follow-up rather than calculating population-specific thresholds. The use of previously calculated MCIDs may be acceptable in specific situations; however, investigators should select an anchor-based MCID calculated from a patient population as similar as possible to their own. This practice is preferable to the use of distribution-approach MCID methods. Alternatively, authors may consider using substantial clinical benefit or patient-acceptable symptom state to assess outcomes after shoulder arthroplasty. CLINICAL RELEVANCE Although MCIDs may provide a useful effect-size based alternative to the traditional p value, care must be taken to use an MCID that is appropriate for the particular patient population being studied.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Michael A. Moverman
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, New England Baptist Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Nicholas R. Pagani
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, New England Baptist Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Richard N. Puzzitiello
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, New England Baptist Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jeremy Dubin
- Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv-Yafo, Israel
| | - Mariano E. Menendez
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, New England Baptist Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Andrew Jawa
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, New England Baptist Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jacob M. Kirsch
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, New England Baptist Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Subscapularis Repair Prior to Subscapularis Takedown in Anatomic Shoulder Arthroplasty: Improving Anatomic Restoration and Mechanics of the Subscapularis. Arthrosc Tech 2022; 11:e321-e326. [PMID: 35256970 PMCID: PMC8897647 DOI: 10.1016/j.eats.2021.11.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2021] [Accepted: 11/09/2021] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Traditionally, total shoulder arthroplasty is performed using a deltopectoral approach through which the glenohumeral joint is accessed by mobilization of the subscapularis. Despite several variations on the subscapularis management techniques, postoperative complications, including subscapularis deficiency and lower functional outcomes, remain an area for improvement. The purpose of this Technical Note is to describe in detail our technique for management of the subscapularis in the setting of a stemless humeral implant through which the repair is planned and almost entirely performed at the beginning of the case, prior to the subscapularis peel. This technique aims to improve outcomes after total shoulder arthroplasty by 1) avoiding the anatomic implant with anchor drilling, 2) improving procedure efficiency, and 3) anatomically "repairing" the subscapularis prior to takedown by placing anchors exactly at the repair-tension site.
Collapse
|
12
|
Relationship between postoperative integrity of subscapularis tendon and functional outcome in reverse shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2022; 31:63-71. [PMID: 34216783 DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2021.05.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2021] [Revised: 05/17/2021] [Accepted: 05/23/2021] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
HYPOTHESIS AND BACKGROUND The role of the subscapularis in reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) remains controversial. Studies have shown that subscapularis repair has no significant influence on the functional outcomes of patients. However, few studies have assessed the postoperative integrity of the subscapularis tendon after RSA. The aims of this study were to investigate the postoperative healing of the subscapularis after RSA via ultrasound and to evaluate the relationship between tendon integrity and functional outcomes. We hypothesized that subjects with a healed subscapularis after RSA would have higher Constant scores and better internal rotation (IR) than those without a healed subscapularis. METHODS This was a retrospective review of all patients who underwent primary RSA with subscapularis tenotomy repair performed by a single surgeon with a minimum 2-year follow-up period. The inclusion criteria were (1) primary RSA and (2) complete intraoperative repair of the subscapularis tenotomy if the tendon was amenable to repair. The total Constant score and active and passive range of motion were measured preoperatively and at every postoperative visit. IR was further subcategorized into 3 functional types (type I, buttock or sacrum; type II, lumbar region; and type III, T12 or higher). The integrity of the subscapularis on ultrasound at 2 years was reported using the Sugaya classification. The correlation between subscapularis integrity and functional outcomes including functional IR was evaluated. RESULTS A total of 86 patients (mean age, 73 ± 7.4 years; age range, 50-89 years) were evaluated. The mean postoperative Constant score for all patients significantly improved from 38 points to 72 points (P < .001) at last follow-up (mean, 3.3 years). There was significant improvement in all Constant score functional subscales and in terms of range of motion. The rate of sonographic healing of the subscapularis was 52.6%. There was no difference in Constant scores between "intact" and "failed" tendon repairs; however, intact tendons demonstrated significantly better IR with no difference in external rotation (P < .01). CONCLUSION The healing rate of the subscapularis following RSA was only 52.6%. IR function in patients with an intact subscapularis at 2 years after RSA was significantly better than in patients with failed or absent tendon repairs. Primary repair of reparable subscapularis tendons during RSA should be strongly considered.
Collapse
|
13
|
Carson EW. CORR Insights®: What Are Practical Surgical Anatomic Landmarks and Distances from Relevant Neurologic Landmarks in Cadavers for the Posterior Approach in Shoulder Arthroplasty? Clin Orthop Relat Res 2021; 479:2332-2333. [PMID: 34415881 PMCID: PMC8445571 DOI: 10.1097/corr.0000000000001944] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2021] [Accepted: 07/21/2021] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Eric W Carson
- Professor, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine in Saint Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Johnson NR, Trofa DP, Saltzman BM, Muña KR, Schiffern SC, Hamid N. Healing Rate and Clinical Outcomes of Lesser Tuberosity Osteotomy for Anatomic Shoulder Arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev 2020; 4:e19.00119. [PMID: 32440624 PMCID: PMC7209808 DOI: 10.5435/jaaosglobal-d-19-00119] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2019] [Accepted: 01/06/2020] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
Several techniques are available for subscapularis management during total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA). Lesser tuberosity osteotomy (LTO) is advocated owing to improved biomechanical strength and high rates of healing. However, displacement or nonunion of the LTO could theoretically cause functional deficits for the affected shoulder. The purpose of this study is to examine the healing rate and clinical outcomes of LTO in patients undergoing anatomic TSA. Methods A retrospective review of our institution's prospectively enrolled TSA registry was performed. Patients undergoing primary TSA who had an LTO performed and radiographs at a minimum of 3 months postoperatively were included. Two fellowship-trained shoulder and elbow surgeons reviewed all radiographs and categorized LTO healing into three groups: healed, nondisplaced nonunion, or displaced nonunion. Physical examination data and patient-reported outcome scores including American Shoulder and Elbow Score, Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation scores, and the Veteran Rand mental and physical component scores were obtained at a median of 1 year after surgery. Comparative statistical analysis was performed on the healed versus nondisplaced nonunion groups. Results We included 142 shoulders in 130 patients who met the inclusion criteria with an average age of 65.2 years (SD: 10.3). Radiographic evaluation at a median of 1.0 years postoperatively (range: 6 months to 2.2 years) revealed 124 (87%) healed LTO, 12 (8%) nondisplaced nonunions, and six (5%) displaced nonunions. The median American Shoulder and Elbow Score total score was 89.2 (IQR: 72.2, 98.3) in the healed LTO group versus 96.7 (30, 98.3) in the LTO nondisplaced nonunion group (P = 0.9637). The median Veteran Rand mental component was 55.1 (IQR: 43.4, 61.0) in the healed LTO group versus 54.6 (38.8, 58.2) in the LTO nondisplaced nonunion group (P = 0.5679). The median Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation score was 85.0 (IQR: 70.0, 95.0) in the LTO-healed group versus 75.1 (35.0, 97.1) in the LTO nondisplaced nonunion group (P = 0.7699). There were no significant differences in revision surgery occurrence between the groups to address subscapularis instability: one patient in the LTO-healed group underwent revision surgery for subscapularis repair 3 months after primary surgery because of continued pain and weakness, and no patients in the other LTO groups underwent revision surgery. Conclusion Although there is a risk of nonunion and displacement using the LTO technique in TSA, the overall clinical outcomes and radiographic union rates are high with a very low risk of revision surgery. In addition, radiographic evidence of nonunion does not significantly correlate with clinical outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nick R Johnson
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery (Dr. Johnson), Carolinas Medical Center; the OrthoCarolina Shoulder and Elbow Center (Dr. Trofa, Dr. Saltzman, Dr. Schiffern, and Dr. Hamid); and the OrthoCarolina Research Institute (Dr. Muña), Charlotte, NC
| | - David P Trofa
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery (Dr. Johnson), Carolinas Medical Center; the OrthoCarolina Shoulder and Elbow Center (Dr. Trofa, Dr. Saltzman, Dr. Schiffern, and Dr. Hamid); and the OrthoCarolina Research Institute (Dr. Muña), Charlotte, NC
| | - Bryan M Saltzman
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery (Dr. Johnson), Carolinas Medical Center; the OrthoCarolina Shoulder and Elbow Center (Dr. Trofa, Dr. Saltzman, Dr. Schiffern, and Dr. Hamid); and the OrthoCarolina Research Institute (Dr. Muña), Charlotte, NC
| | - Katherine R Muña
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery (Dr. Johnson), Carolinas Medical Center; the OrthoCarolina Shoulder and Elbow Center (Dr. Trofa, Dr. Saltzman, Dr. Schiffern, and Dr. Hamid); and the OrthoCarolina Research Institute (Dr. Muña), Charlotte, NC
| | - Shadley C Schiffern
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery (Dr. Johnson), Carolinas Medical Center; the OrthoCarolina Shoulder and Elbow Center (Dr. Trofa, Dr. Saltzman, Dr. Schiffern, and Dr. Hamid); and the OrthoCarolina Research Institute (Dr. Muña), Charlotte, NC
| | - Nady Hamid
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery (Dr. Johnson), Carolinas Medical Center; the OrthoCarolina Shoulder and Elbow Center (Dr. Trofa, Dr. Saltzman, Dr. Schiffern, and Dr. Hamid); and the OrthoCarolina Research Institute (Dr. Muña), Charlotte, NC
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Matsen FA, Whitson A, Jackins SE, Neradilek MB, Warme WJ, Hsu JE. Ream and run and total shoulder: patient and shoulder characteristics in five hundred forty-four concurrent cases. INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS 2019; 43:2105-2115. [DOI: 10.1007/s00264-019-04352-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2019] [Accepted: 05/28/2019] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
|