Most coronoid fractures and fracture-dislocations with no radial head involvement can be treated nonsurgically with elbow immobilization

A Feasibility Study on Using Hanging Arm Test to Assess Elbow Stability During Surgical Treatment for Varus Posteromedial Rotatory Instability

Objectives

The aim of this study to investigate the safety and effectiveness of performing the hanging arm test during surgical treatment for elbow varus posteromedial rotatory instability (VPMRI) to assess elbow stability and determine whether to repair the lateral ulnar collateral ligament (LUCL).

Methods

In a retrospective study from August 2014 to March 2019, 27 patients with VPMRI who had a negative result in the hanging arm test after fixation of coronoid fracture were selected. Intraoperative bleeding, operative time, elbow range of motion (ROM), and complications were recorded. Elbow function was evaluated with the Mayo elbow performance score (MEPS) and the disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand (DASH) score.

Results

The operation time was 85.9 ± 11.06 min (range 65-110). The intraoperative blood loss was 70.7 ± 9.31 ml (range 60-100). At the last follow-up, the elbow joint averaged 73.8° ± 2.931° in pronation, 78.9° ± 2.941° in supination, 7.2° ± 3.207° in extension, and 123.3° ± 6.651° in flexion. The MEPS score was 90.7 ± 4.36 (range 74-95), and the DASH score was 9.8 ± 2.58 (range 6.67-13.3). One patient presented with symptoms of ulnar nerve entrapment 2 months after operation and was treated with ulnar nerve release. The symptom of numbness went away completely 1 week after operation. No complications such as wound infection, arthritis, or chronic instability of the elbow were found in the other patients.

Conclusion

Our findings suggest that not all VPMRI patients need the LUCL to be repaired, and the hanging arm test is a safe and reliable method to assess whether to repair the LUCL in the treatment of elbow VPMRI.

Level of evidence

Level IV; Retrospective studies.

Considerable variation in current coronoid height and fracture measurement techniques: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Coronoid fractures usually occur in the presence of a significant osseoligamentous injury to the elbow. Fracture size and location correlate with degree of instability and many authors have attempted to analyze the effect of fracture variation on decision making and outcome. There remains no standardized technique for measuring coronoid height or fracture size. The aim of this study was to appraise the literature regarding techniques for coronoid height measurement in order to understand variation.

METHODS

Preferred Reporting Items of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines were followed. A search was performed to identify studies with either a description of coronoid height, fracture size, or bone loss using the terms (Coronoid) AND (Measurement) OR (Size) OR (Height). Articles were shortlisted by screening for topic relevance based on title, abstract and, if required, full-text review. Exclusion criteria were non-English articles, those on nonhuman species or parts other than the ulna coronoid process, and studies that included patients with pre-existing elbow pathology. Shortlisted articles were grouped based on study type, imaging modality, measurement technique, and measurement parameter as well as its location along the coronoid.

RESULTS

Thirty out of the initially identified 494 articles met the inclusion criteria. Twenty-one articles were clinical studies, 8 were cadaveric studies, and 1 combined patients as well as cadavers. A variety of imaging modalities (plain radiographs, 2-dimensional computed tomography [CT], 3-dimensional CT, magnetic resonance imaging or a combination of these) were used with CT scan (either 2-dimensional images or 3-dimensional reconstructions or both) being the most common modality used by 21 studies. Measurement technique also varied from uniplanar linear measurements in 15 studies to multiplanar area and volumetric measurements in 6 studies to techniques describing various angles and indices as an indirect measure of coronoid height in 8 studies. Across the 30 shortlisted studies, 19 different measurement techniques were identified. Fifteen studies measured normal coronoid height while the other 15 measured intact coronoid and/or fracture fragment height. The location of this measurement was also variable between studies with measurements at the apex of the coronoid in 24/30 (80%) of studies. Measurement accuracy was assessed by only 1 study. A total of 12/30 (40%) studies reported on the interobserver and intraobserver reliability of their measurement technique.

CONCLUSION

The systemic review demonstrated considerable variability between studies that report coronoid height or fracture size measurements. This variability makes comparison of coronoid height or fracture measurements and recommendations based on these between studies unreliable. There is need for development of a consistent, easy to use, and reproducible technique for coronoid height and bone loss.

The role of arthroscopy in the management of adult elbow trauma

Fractures around the elbow are often challenging to treat and in most cases require an extensive approach. Since the development of elbow arthroscopy, most authors have pointed out the potential advantages of a less invasive technique that can be useful for visualization and reduction of the articular fragments with an eventual percutaneous fixation. Arthroscopic techniques provide a limited exposure that may lead to a faster wound healing, lower rate of complications and thus, better recovery of range of motion. However, elbow arthroscopy is also a demanding technique, especially in a swollen and fractured joint, and it is not exempt of risks. The overall rate of complications has been rated from 1.5% to 11% and nerve injury rates from 1.26-7.5%.The objective of this review is to present the arthroscopic setup and general surgical technique for the management of elbow trauma and to define some clear indications. Patient positioning and operating room display is key in order to obtain success. In addition to the arthroscopic equipment, fluoroscopy is almost always necessary for percutaneous fixation and precise preparation is mandatory. In the last decade, literature regarding new portals or surgical tips for arthroscopic treatment of elbow fractures have been published.The main indications for fracture arthroscopic-assisted fixation are those articular fractures involving the coronoid, distal humerus shear fractures in the coronal plane (trochlear and capitellum fractures) and, more controversially, those affecting the radial head. The treatment of these type of fractures all arthroscopically is exponentially demanding as it might also require ligament repair. For coronoid fractures, it can be useful in Morrey type II and III, and O´Driscoll anteromedial facet fractures associated to a posteromedial instability pattern that also require a repair of the LCL. Although excellent results have been published, comparative series are scarce. Radial head fractures can also be approached arthroscopically in simple non-comminute fractures that can be fixed percutaneously.In conclusion, arthroscopy of the elbow is an excellent tool to better understand and visualize articular fractures of the elbow. However, despite the advances in surgical technique, whether it improves clinical and radiological results is still to be proven.

Influence of Coronoid fixation on the functional outcome and rate of complications in surgically treated acute complex elbow instability

INTRODUCTION

Fractures of the coronoid commonly present in elbow fracture-dislocations. Despite the evidence that the coronoid plays an important role in elbow stability, there is still controversy on which fractures should be surgically fixed. The aim of this study is to compare the clinical outcomes and rate of complications of patients with elbow fracture-dislocations in which the coronoid was fixed or left untreated.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty-nine patients with an elbow fracture-dislocation involving a coronoid fracture were prospectively followed for an average of 90 months (range 24-190). According to Morrey´s classification there were 22 type II and 8 type III. Nine patients had an anteromedial fracture of the coronoid. In 24 patients the coronoid was repaired (suture fixation in 9, screws fixation in 10 and plate fixation in 5) and in 15 patients the coronoid was not fixed. In 18 patients the radial head was replaced and in 8 patients it was fixed. All patients underwent repair of the lateral ligament complex. Clinical evaluation was performed with the MEPS. Radiographically, the rate of coronoid nonunion was specifically analyzed. Postoperative neurological complications were recorded.

RESULTS

At the most recent follow up, the average arc of flexion-extension was 120° (range 70°-140°) with a mean MEPS of 90 (range 25-100). No statistically significant differences were found in the MEPS and flexion-extension arc between the patients in whom synthesis was performed (117° ROM, and 89 MEPS) and those in whom it was not (122° ROM, 94 MEPS) (p = 0.42; p = 0.34). Coronoid fracture healing could be assessed in 36 patients: in 19 patients the coronoid was radiographically healed, and in 17 a nonunion was present, with no difference in the final clinical outcome between both groups. Nine patients, 6 of whom had undergone coronoid fixation, had a neurological complication related to the ulnar nerve.

CONCLUSIONS

Coronoid fractures affecting around 50% of its height can be treated without internal fixation as long as the rest of the osteo-ligamentous structures are adequately repaired. Osteosynthesis of the coronoid through a medial approach may carry a non-negligible risk of associated neurological injury.

Acute and chronic coronoid reconstruction using the olecranon Tip

Post-traumatic coronoid deficiency in the elbow can lead to chronic pain, instability and arthritis. A variety of osteochondral grafts have been used to reconstruct the coronoid, and restore elbow stability. The radial head and iliac crest grafts are the most common in the literature but have limitations. The olecranon tip is a promising alternative, with both cadaveric and computer models demonstrating superior congruency, without compromising elbow stability or disrupting the extensor mechanism. We present a small, case series demonstrating the technique for contralateral and ipsilateral grafts in both the acute and chronic setting.

Conservative versus surgical management of isolated O'Driscoll II coronoid fracture: A systematic review

PURPOSE

The purpose of this systematic review is to summarize the current literature on conservative and surgical management of isolated O'Driscoll II coronoid fracture.

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review.

METHODS

We systematically searched Medline, Embase, Google Scholar, and Web of Science databases for published studies by complying with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines and using the keywords "isolated coronoid fracture," "O'Driscoll type 2 coronoid fracture," "anteromedial coronoid fracture," "anteromedial facet coronoid fracture," "posteromedial rotatory instability," and "varus posteromedial rotatory instability." Patients were divided into conservative treatment and surgical treatment groups. Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine and Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies were assessed to determine each article's quality. The primary outcomes of the present reviews were the Mayo elbow performance score (MEPS) and the disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand (DASH) score, and the secondary outcomes were associated with complications and reoperations. Eligible trials were independently chosen by two review authors, and a third reviewer resolved all disagreements.

RESULTS

The search yielded 458 records, among which 446 articles were of relevance, and 12 were included. In the final review, 138 patients were evaluated-98 (71%) who received surgical treatment and 40 (29%) who received conservative treatment. The mean MEPS score and the DASH score of surgical treatment were 91 and 8, respectively; 69.8% of patients had excellent scores, and 27.0% had good scores. The mean MEPS score and the DASH score of conservative treatment were 92 and 12, respectively; 70.6% of patients had excellent scores, and 23.5% had good scores.

CONCLUSIONS

In select cases, conservative treatment can achieve good results in the treatment of isolated O'Driscoll II coronoid fracture when a stricter indication is followed. However, there is insufficient evidence to recommend the appropriate treatment for a particular fracture subtype, and there is a need for more high-quality randomized controlled trials to determine which treatment is superior.

Comparison of buttress plate and cannulated screw in the treatment of anteromedial coronoid fracture with elbow posteromedial rotatory instability

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study is to compare the effect of buttress plate and cannulated screw in the treatment of anteromedial coronoid fracture with posteromedial rotatory instability (PMRI).

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated patients who were diagnosed with O'Driscoll type 2 fractures combined with elbow posteromedial rotatory instability and underwent surgery for anteromedial coronoid fracture between August 2014 and March 2019. They were divided into buttress plate (n=16) and cannulated screw (n=11) groups. The elbow range of motion, visual analog scale (VAS), Mayo elbow performance score (MEPS), and disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand score (DASH) were used for clinical outcome assessment.

RESULT

There were no significant differences in clinical outcomes. However, the surgical time was significantly shorter in cannulated screw group (85.45±4.156) compared to the buttress plate group (93.81±8.863, P=0.008), and the surgical time was associated with internal fixation (P=0.008).

CONCLUSION

Although there was selection of cases in that small fragments were treated with buttress plate and large fragments with cannulated screw, the buttress plate and cannulated screw have comparable functional outcomes on fixation of the anteromedial coronoid fracture with elbow PMRI. The fixation of the anteromedial coronoid fracture with large fragments using the cannulated screw has a shorter operation time.

A Retrospective Study on Traumatic Elbow Dislocation in Adults in a Tertiary Hospital in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

Background This retrospective chart review aimed to ascertain the frequency and characteristics of radial head fractures in adults who presented to our emergency department with elbow dislocation. Methodology This study was conducted in a single tertiary trauma center in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, between July 2015 and July 2020 to identify traumatic elbow dislocation in adults. Patients were identified after thoroughly examining the hospital's electronic X-ray database. In addition, computed tomography (CT) was used to assess complete ulnohumeral joint dislocation. In total, 80 patients between the ages of 18 and 65 were evaluated for a radial head fracture. Various variables were examined. Results Of the 80 patients included, the mean age with standard deviation was 36.9 ± 8.8 years, and all patients were males. Nearly all patients with elbow dislocation had some form of posterior dislocation, including posterolateral (81.3%), posterior (10%), and posteromedial (7.5%) dislocation. The radial head fracture was identified in 48 (60%) cases. Radiographs were sufficient to diagnose 91.3% of radial head fractures, while the remaining 8.8% required additional CT. Conclusions Based on X-ray or CT findings, radial head fractures were found in more than half of traumatic elbow dislocations. In addition, most cases were diagnosed as an elbow dislocation and radial head fracture using only plain radiography, while some required additional CT. Based on these findings, we recommend routine CT to detect suspected elbow dislocation and avoid missing subtle injuries.

Humeral trochlear morphology does not influence coronoid fractures in elbow dislocation

PURPOSE

Traumatic elbow dislocation is the second most frequent joint dislocation, even though the elbow is a congruent and stable joint. Individual variability in anatomical congruence of the elbow and how it relates to simple or complex instability has rarely been studied in the literature; we hypothesized that a greater articular coverage by the humeral trochlea would be more likely to result in complex dislocation. The aim of this study is to analyze trochlear morphology in simple (SED) and complex elbow dislocation (CED), to assess whether the degree of humeroulnar joint congruence influences the incidence of coronoid fractures in elbow dislocation. The secondary goal is to evaluate the association between trochlear morphology and coronoid fracture pattern.

METHODS

All the elbow CT scans of the hospital server were retrospectively analyzed. 62 patients were enrolled and so divided in 2 groups: SED and CED with isolated coronoid fracture. Patients who were skeletally immature, presented with other concomitant elbow fractures, or who previously underwent elbow surgery were excluded. The CT scans were performed after closed reduction and prior to further treatment. Coronoid fracture pattern was classified on CT scan according to Regan-Morrey and O'Driscoll classifications; "grade 0" was assigned to SED. Trochlear coverage was measured and expressed as three angles (anterior, posterior, and distal) and their width/depth ratios. Measurements were taken by four different readers and the assessment was repeated after 15 days.

RESULTS

No statistically significant difference was found between humeral trochlear morphology of SED and CED patients. There was no association between morphometric measurements and coronoid fracture pattern. The results are strengthened by a good intra- and inter-reader reproducibility of the CT analysis protocol.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study is the first to evaluate the impact of trochlear morphology on elbow instability. Considering the results, other variables may have a greater impact on coronoid bone damage, such as trauma energy or ligamentous hyperlaxity: in particular, we believe that the capsuloligamentous structures of the elbow might contribute in a preponderant way to articular stability. The CT analysis protocol gave excellent results: reproducible, accurate and easy to perform.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Results of arthroscopically assisted reduction and fixation of anteromedial facet coronoid fractures at short-term follow-up

BACKGROUND

Varus posteromedial rotatory instability is a typical pattern of elbow injury that involves fracture of the anteromedial facet (AMF) of the coronoid, as well as injuries to the lateral ligament complex and the posterior bundle of the medial collateral ligament. Some authors support the idea that subtype II AMF coronoid fractures require fixation to restore elbow stability, but this topic is still an issue in the literature. The purpose of this study was to assess the clinical and radiologic outcomes of arthroscopically assisted reduction and internal fixation (ARIF) of AMF fractures.

METHODS

This retrospective single-center trial evaluated consecutive patients who underwent ARIF of isolated subtype II AMF coronoid fractures between 2014 and 2020. At the final follow-up, the patients were examined for elbow range of motion, stability, and pain. Injury and post-treatment radiographs were reviewed to assess fracture healing and heterotopic ossification.

RESULTS

A total of 32 patients (21 male and 11 female patients) with a median age of 47 ± 16 years were included. The average follow-up period was 28 ± 12.4 months. Coronoid process fractures were fixed by cannulated screws in 26 cases (81.25%); in 2 of these cases, additional Kirschner wires were used. Two Kirschner wires were used in 1 case (3.12%), and in the remaining 5 cases (15.62%), osteosuture was used. The lateral ulnar collateral ligament was injured in 27 cases (84.4%) and was always repaired. Other associated lesions were medial collateral ligament injury, osteochondral lesion, and radial head fracture. There were no surgical complications. At the final follow-up, the average Mayo Elbow Performance Score was 98.4 ± 2.7 and the mean Oxford Elbow Score was 47.3 ± 1.4. No cases of nonunion were detected on radiographic assessment.

CONCLUSIONS

Although technically demanding, ARIF has several potential advantages in comparison to open surgery: less scarring, a decreased risk of infection, and less postoperative pain.

The radiological findings in complex elbow fracture-dislocation injuries

Elbow fracture-dislocation is a complex injury which can lead to significant bony and soft tissue damage. Surgical intervention is guided towards restoring joint stability, allowing early mobilization and preventing long-term joint stiffness. The most common types are posterolateral, posteromedial, Monteggia type (and variants), and anterior trans-olecranon fracture-dislocations. Posterolateral fracture-dislocation is characterized by a radial head fracture (± anterolateral coronoid fracture) and typically capsuloligamentous disruption (lateral collateral ligaments injury is the most common). A posterolateral fracture-dislocation with radial head and coronoid anterolateral facet fractures is termed a terrible triad injury. In posteromedial fracture-dislocation, there is a fracture of the anteromedial facet of the coronoid, typically with proximal avulsion of the lateral collateral ligaments (± injury to the posterior bundle of the ulnar collateral ligament). Monteggia fracture-dislocation injuries demonstrate proximal ulnar fracture (with possible involvement of the olecranon and the coronoid) and radial head dislocation. These can be divided into apex anterior or apex posterior variants. The latter are commonly associated with radial head fractures and lateral ligamentous injury, and have a worse prognosis. In trans-olecranon fracture-dislocation, there is significant disruption of the greater sigmoid notch and the olecranon, with various involvement of the coronoid and the proximal ulna. The article describes the radiological findings and outlines the management principles in complex elbow fracture-dislocation injuries.

Repair Versus Non-Repair of Lateral Ulnar Collateral Ligament in Elbow Varus Posteromedial Rotatory Instability Treatment: A Comparative Study

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effects of repairing and not repairing the lateral ulnar collateral ligament (LUCL) when surgically treating elbow varus posteromedial rotatory instability (PMRI).

METHODS

In this retrospective study spanning June 2014 to February 2019, 24 patients with elbow PMRI who were treated surgically were assigned to group RL (Repair LUCL) or group NL (Non-repair LUCL) depending on whether the LUCL was repaired. Hospitalization time, operation time, intraoperative blood loss, and related complications were reviewed. The elbow range of motion (ROM), the visual analog scale (VAS), the Mayo elbow performance score (MEPS), and the disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand (DASH) score were used for functional assessment.

RESULTS

Among the 24 patients with PMRI, 15 were assigned to group RL and nine were assigned to group NL. The mean blood loss (184.66 ± 20.3 vs 207.33 ± 19.447, P < 0.001), the operation time (98.88 ± 12.693 min vs 184.66 ± 20.3 min, P < 0.001) were significantly lower in group RL compared to group NL. There were no significant differences between the two groups in time until surgery and follow-up time (6.66 ± 1.838 vs 6.11 ± 1.900 days, 25.53 ± 2.099 vs 26.11 ± 2.891 months, P = 0.577, P = 0.486). All of the patients achieved bone union. The elbow flexion-extension ROM (122.00° ± 3.162°vs 121.11° ± 3.333° at 12 months, P = 0.520) and pronation-supination ROM (154.53° ± 3.335° vs 155.55° ± 4.639° at 12 months, P = 0.537). Both groups achieved similar results in MEPS score (90.53 ± 2.695 vs 89.77 ± 3.865, P = 0.578) and DASH (9.77 ± 1.897 vs 9.99 ± 1.550, P = 0.772) score at the final follow-up. And the MEPS score revealed excellent results (87% in group RL, 89% in group NL).The VAS scores decreased significantly in group RL (from 6.13 ± 0.990 to 1.93 ± 0.593) and group NL (from 5.77 ± 1.481 to 1.88 ± 0.781), and no significant differences in preoperative or final follow-up were observed between the two groups (P = 0.487, P = 0.876). Complications observed in group NL with one patient occurred cubital tunnel syndrome 3 months after the operation, the patient underwent ulnar nerve simple neurolysis and the symptoms were relieved after 3 weeks.

CONCLUSION

For patients with elbow PMRI, satisfactory functional outcomes can be yielded with non-repair of the LUCL as long as the stable elbow joint is performed during operation.

The three-column concept of elbow joint stability and the Wrightington elbow fracture-dislocation classification, emphasizing the role of cross-sectional imaging

Elbow fracture-dislocation is a complex injury with a combination of osseous and soft tissue disruption. Different classification systems have been used to describe the injury pattern and help guide the management. The article describes the important cross-sectional findings in complex elbow fracture-dislocation injuries based on the relatively new Wrightington classification. This includes the various elements and patterns seen in elbow fracture-dislocations providing a simple and comprehensive system to classify these injuries and help guide the surgical management. The article also describes the three-column concept of elbow joint stability, dividing the elbow joint osseous structures into lateral, middle and medial columns. Detailed radiological assessment of the fractures pattern is vital to understand the mechanism of injury, allowing clinicians to predict the associated capsuloligamentous injury and help guide the management decisions. The Wrightington elbow fracture-dislocation classification categorizes the injuries according to the ulnar coronoid process and radial head fractures. Type A is an anteromedial coronoid fracture. Type B is a bifacet or basal coronoid fracture, with B + indicating associated radial head fracture. Type C is a combined anterolateral facet and radial head or comminuted radial head fractures. Type D is a diaphyseal ulnar fracture, with D + indicating associated radial head fracture.

Proximal ulna fractures in adults: A review of diagnosis and management

Proximal ulna fractures are relatively common upper limb injuries, which may represent fragility fractures or result from high-energy trauma. These include fractures of the olecranon, coronoid and associated radial head dislocations. A wide variety of treatment options are available for the management of these injuries that makes the selection of most appropriate treatment difficult. We aim to provide a brief overview of the treatment options for such injuries.

Posteromedial rotatory instability of the elbow: What the radiologist needs to know

Varus posteromedial rotatory instability of the elbow joint is a relatively new subject described for the first time in 2003. It occurs secondary to axial loading of the elbow with varus force and internal rotation of the forearm. There is usually a specific pattern of osseous and soft tissue injuries that can be recognized on imaging. This includes an anteromedial coronoid fracture and avulsion of the lateral collateral ligament complex from its humeral attachment. Ulnar collateral ligament complex injury is also reported, particularly its posterior bundle which plays an important role in posteromedial elbow joint stability. There is high incidence of early osteoarthritis secondary to the resultant varus instability and increased contact pressure at the ulnohumeral joint. Surgical fixation of the coronoid fracture and ligamentous reconstruction maybe indicated to prevent this recurrent instability. The article reviews the key radiological features of posteromedial rotatory instability with multiple examples from different imaging modalities. The relevant anatomy of the elbow joint stabilising structures will be illustrated, in particular the coronoid process anatomy and the O'Driscoll classification for coronoid process fractures. Radiologists should be familiar with the imaging findings of posteromedial rotatory instability.

Management of anteromedial coronoid fractures according to a protocol focused on instability assessment provides good outcomes with infrequent need for coronoid fixation

BACKGROUND

Anteromedial coronoid fractures (AMCFs) are associated with persistent elbow instability and post-traumatic arthritis if managed incorrectly. It is unclear exactly which AMCFs require surgical intervention and how to make this decision. The aims of this study were to report outcomes of AMCFs managed using a protocol based on reproduction of instability using radiographic and clinical testing and to ascertain a threshold size of AMCF associated with instability.

METHODS

Forty-three AMCFs were studied. Thirty-two patients formed the primary study group (group A). All were treated using a protocol in which the decision to perform coronoid fixation was based on the presence of radiographic or clinical evidence of instability. Functional outcomes (Oxford Elbow Score), radiographic outcomes, complications, and reoperations were collected, and a receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was performed to assess the optimal coronoid fracture height to recommend coronoid fixation. The results were compared with a historical group of 11 patients with AMCFs not treated according to the protocol (group B).

RESULTS

Of the patients, 23 had an isolated AMCF and 20 had a concurrent radial head injury. Complete nonoperative treatment of the elbow was performed in 16 patients (37%) (11 of 32 [34%] in group A vs. 5 of 11 [45%] in group B, P = .46). In 10 patients (23%), only repair of the lateral collateral ligament was performed (9 in group A and 1 in group B), whereas 8 patients (19%) underwent repair of the lateral collateral ligament and radial head fixation or replacement (6 in group A and 2 in group B). Acute coronoid fixation was performed in 9 patients (21%) (6 in group A and 3 in group B). At a mean follow-up of 20 months (range, 12-56 months), group A showed a significantly better Oxford Elbow Score (42 vs. 31, P = .02), lower complication rate (3 of 32 [9%] vs. 8 of 11 [72%], P < .001), and lower reoperation rate (1 of 32 [3%] vs. 6 of 11 [54%], P < .001) than group B. Persistent instability was found in 6 patients in group B and none in group A. The receiver operating characteristic curve analysis demonstrated 6.5 mm to be the optimal AMCF size for surgery to prevent persistent instability.

CONCLUSION

Patients treated according to a protocol in which preoperative reproduction of instability determined the degree of surgical intervention had good clinical and radiographic outcomes. Our study demonstrated that AMCFs > 6.5 mm are likely to be more unstable and require intervention. If these principles are followed, a specifically defined subset of AMCFs can be treated nonsurgically without adverse outcomes.

Treatment of elbow instability: state of the art

The elbow is a congruent joint with a high degree of inherent stability, provided by osseous and soft-tissue constraints; however, when substantial lesions of these stabilising structures happen, instability of the elbow occurs. Significant improvements in surgical elbow instability diagnosis and treatment have been recently introduced both for acute and chronic cases. Specific stress tests, recently introduced in the clinical practice, and different imaging techniques, both static and dynamic, allow assessment of the elbow stabilisers and detection of the instability direction and mechanism even in subtle forms. Many surgical techniques have been standardised and surgical instruments and devices, specifically dedicated to elbow instability treatment, have been developed. Specific rehabilitation protocols have been designed to protect the healing of the elbow stabilisers while minimising elbow stiffness. However, despite the progress, surgical treatments can be challenging even for expert surgeons and the rate of persistent instability, post-traumatic arthritis, stiffness and pain can be still high especially in most demanding cases. The biology of the soft-tissue healing remains one of the most important aspects for future investigation. If future research will help to understand, correct or modulate the biological response of soft-tissue healing, our confidence in elbow instability management and the reproducibility of our treatment will tremendously improve. In this paper, the state of the art of the current knowledge of elbow instability is presented, specifically focusing on modern surgical techniques used to solve instability, with repair or reconstruction of the damaged elbow stabilisers.

Functional Outcome of Surgically Treated Isolated Coronoid Fractures With Elbow Dislocation in Young and Active Patients

Coronoid fractures are less frequent injuries seen in around one-tenth of patients with elbow dislocation. Any injury to the coronoid process can be associated with elbow instability, in which injury to collateral ligaments co-exists, resulting in a loss of congruency of the elbow joint. However, there is a scarcity of evidence regarding patients' management with elbow dislocation and associated coronoid fractures. So, our aim is to assess the functional outcome of the elbow after operative fixation in patients with any type of coronoid fracture with associated elbow dislocation. A total of six patients with closed coronoid fracture of the elbow, with associated elbow dislocation, without any other associated trauma or previous surgery to the same limb, were included in our study. After closed reduction, patients with an incongruent reduction of the elbow joint were operated. The injured structures were repaired in an inside-out sequence: the coronoid fragment was first reduced by using a lasso-type suture. The larger fragments of the coronoid were fixed with either a screw or a plate when deemed necessary. Then, the lateral collateral ligament was repaired either using a suture anchor or transosseous (No. 2 Arthrex; Naples, Florida) sutures.

After repair, the elbow was examined for stability radiologically using the hanging arm test; a concentric reduction of the elbow in lateral view during this test indicates a stable elbow. All patients showed a good to excellent outcome on the Mayo elbow performance score (MEPS) at the final follow-up (three patients had an excellent score while three had a good score). At the final follow-up, mean elbow flexion was 124º, loss of extension was 10º in only one patient, mean supination was 80º, and mean pronation was 72º. Isolated fractures of the coronoid associated with elbow dislocation require appropriate evaluation and management. Closed reduction and immobilization alone in young and active patients may not be sufficient, especially in patients with incongruent ulnohumeral joint. Surgical fixation of the coronoid fragment and repair of the collateral ligament, whenever indicated, can provide good functional outcomes.