Proceedings from the 2018 International Consensus Meeting on Orthopedic Infections: prevention of periprosthetic shoulder infection

Two-Stage Exchange Arthroplasty for Periprosthetic Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty Infection Provides Comparable Functional Outcomes to Primary Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty

This study aimed to compare functional outcomes after two-stage revision reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) with the results of primary RSA. Patients affected by PJI and treated by means of two-stage revision RSA were 1:1 matched with a group of patients who were treated electively with RSA without developing any complications. Out of 1477 RSAs performed between 2009 and 2021, 16 patients developed a PJI. Each matched cohort comprised 16 patients (3 females, 13 males). The mean age was 69.13 ± 5.43 years old in the PJI group and 70.28 ± 5.04 (p = 0.543) in the matched cohort. The mean follow-up was 41.23 ± 26.9 months in the PJI group and 28.5 ± 20.2 (p = 0.142) in the matched group. Only one patient showed recurrent PJI five years after revision RSA. Comparison between the PJI patients and matched patients did not show any significant differences at the latest follow-up, nor for subjective shoulder value (SSV) (p = 0.101) or Constant score (p = 0.134). Two-stage exchange RSA for PJI allows for appropriate control of the disease and good functional outcomes. Comparison with an age- and sex-matched cohort of uninfected patients showed no significant differences, thus confirming the idea that revision surgeries may lead to satisfactory functional outcomes, as expected after primary surgery.

Preoperative prophylactic antibiotics administration does not influence culture yield in revision shoulder arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

The importance of administrating prophylactic antibiotics prior to a surgical procedure is well established. Given the difficulty in diagnosing shoulder periprosthetic infections, which are more indolent in nature, some advocate holding prophylactic antibiotics prior to obtaining cultures as there is a concern antibiotics may lead to a false negative culture result. The purpose of this study is to determine whether administration of antibiotics prior to obtaining cultures in revision shoulder arthroplasty influences culture yield.

METHODS

This was a retrospective analysis of revision shoulder arthroplasty cases performed at a single institution between 2015 and 2021. During the study period, each surgeon had a standardized protocol that dictated whether antibiotics were given or held prior to each revision surgery. Each case was categorized into either a Preculture antibiotic group, if antibiotics were administered prior to incision, or a Postculture antibiotic group if antibiotics were administered after incision and obtaining cultures. The International Consensus Meeting (ICM) scoring criteria provided by the Musculoskeletal Infection Society was used to categorize the probability of periprosthetic joint infection for each case. Culture positivity was calculated as the ratio of positive cultures and total number of cultures obtained.

RESULTS

One hundred twenty-four patients met inclusion criteria. There were 48 patients in the Preculture group and 76 patients in the Postculture group. No significant difference in patient demographics or ICM criteria (P = .09) was observed between the 2 groups. With regard to culture positivity, there was no difference between the Preculture antibiotic group and the Postculture antibiotic group (16% vs. 15%, P = .82, confidence interval = 8%-25% vs. 10%-20%, respectively).

CONCLUSION

In the setting of revision shoulder arthroplasty, timing of antibiotic administration did not significantly influence culture yield. This study supports the use of prophylactic antibiotics prior to obtaining cultures in revision shoulder arthroplasty.

Preoperative allergy testing for patients reporting penicillin and cephalosporin allergies is economically justified in preventing infection after total shoulder arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

The use of alternative antibiotics to cefazolin has been associated with increased risk of infection after shoulder arthroplasty. Routine preoperative allergy testing in patients reporting penicillin and cephalosporin allergies increases the number able to receive cefazolin and may reduce the occurrence of infection after shoulder arthroplasty, but the financial viability of this practice is unclear. We used break-even modeling to determine the economic viability of routine preoperative allergy testing for infection prevention in total shoulder arthroplasty patients reporting penicillin and cephalosporin allergies.

METHODS

Allergy testing cost ($248.24), infection rates after shoulder arthroplasty following use of noncefazolin antibiotics (3.09%), and infection-related care costs ($55,243) were derived from the literature. A break-even equation using these variables was developed to determine the absolute risk reduction (ARR) in the infection rate that would economically justify the routine implementation of preoperative allergy testing. The number needed to treat was calculated from the ARR.

RESULTS

Preoperative allergy testing is considered economically justified if it prevents at least 1 infection out of 223 shoulder arthroplasties (ARR = 0.45%). These protocols remained economically viable at varying allergy testing costs, initial infection rates, and infection-related care costs.

CONCLUSIONS

Routine preoperative penicillin allergy testing is an economically justified infection prevention strategy among patients reporting penicillin and cephalosporin allergies in the setting of elective shoulder arthroplasty. Widespread implementation of this practice may considerably reduce the economic and societal burden associated with prosthetic infections.

Evaluation of the effectiveness of skin preparation methods for the reduction of Cutibacterium acnes (formerly Propionibacterium acnes) in shoulder surgery: a systematic review

Background

Cutibacterium acnes (C. acnes) is the most common pathogen responsible for post-operative shoulder infections. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of skin preparation methods against C. acnes in shoulder surgery.

Methods

A systematic review was conducted evaluating the effectiveness of skin preparation methods in the reduction of C. acnes in patients undergoing shoulder surgery. Outcomes were assessed based on the effectiveness of the method used; side effects and cost were also analysed.

Results

Of the 19 included studies, 9 evaluated pre-surgical home treatments: 8 assessed benzoyl peroxide (BPO) and 6 concluded it is effective in reducing C. acnes. Nine studies assessed surgical skin preparation and concluded that Chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) was not effective; in contrast hydrogen peroxide reduced C. acnes. Finally, one study evaluated an aseptic protocol using CHG and concluded that it was not effective.

Conclusions

It was demonstrated that BPO as home treatment is effective in reducing C. acnes load on skin; it rarely causes side effects and is also cost-effective. This study highlights non-effectiveness of CHG. There was some evidence that the addition of hydrogen peroxide could have a positive effect in the reduction of C. acnes skin load; however, more studies are required.

Efficacy of antimicrobial washes before shoulder surgery against Cutibacterium: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Cutibacterium acnes is a commensal intradermal microorganism that is commonly isolated at revision shoulder arthroplasty. Standard practice chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) skin preparation agents have limited effectiveness at eradicating C. acnes in the dermis. Benzoyl peroxide (BPO) has demonstrated effectiveness against C. acnes. This meta-analysis compares the efficacy of at-home shoulder decolonization before surgery using CHG vs. BPO to reduce shoulder C. acnes burden.

Methods

This was a Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses systematic review. PubMed and MEDLINE databases were searched for studies evaluating the effects of CHG and BPO in reducing C. acnes at the shoulder. Trial results were extracted and pooled using a random effects model, separating data from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and non-RCTs. Methodologic quality of studies was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Assessment Tools.

Results

Ten studies (589 patients) were included. RCTs showed that both BPO and CHG led to significant reductions in culture positivity compared with negative controls (risk ratio [RR] with 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.20 [0.13, 0.30], P < .0001 and 0.46 [0.37, 0.57], P < .0001, respectively). Non-RCT data demonstrated similar results comparing BPO and CHG to the control (RR with 95% CI = 0.34 [0.21, 0.57], P < .0001 and 0.31 [0.20, 0.49], P < .0001, respectively). Comparing BPO and CHG, RCT data showed a significant reduction in culture positivity with BPO (RR with 95% CI = 0.46 [0.27, 0.77], P < .009). Of RCTs, 5 were low and one was of moderate risk of bias. Of non-RCTs, 3 had low risk of bias, whereas one had moderate risk of bias.

Conclusion

This review demonstrated that preoperative CHG and BPO can reduce C. acnes at the shoulder. However, BPO exhibits greater efficacy than CHG, potentially because of the compound's ability to penetrate the dermis. BPO is a simple and economical agent that may reduce joint exposure to C. acnes in shoulder surgery.

Antibiotic Prophylaxis with Cefazolin Is Associated with Lower Shoulder Periprosthetic Joint Infection Rates Than Non-Cefazolin Alternatives

BACKGROUND

Although prophylactic antibiotics are considered the standard of care, data with regard to the comparative efficacy of specific antibiotics in the prevention of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) have remained limited. This study evaluated whether perioperative antibiotic choice affects rates of PJI development in shoulder arthroplasty.

METHODS

From 2000 to 2019, all primary shoulder arthroplasty types (hemiarthroplasty, anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty, reverse shoulder arthroplasty) performed for elective and trauma indications with perioperative antibiotic data and a minimum follow-up of 2 years were identified from a single institution. Demographic characteristics, PJI risk factors, and PJI-free survivorship data were retrieved. Multivariable analyses were conducted to determine the association between the antibiotic administered and the development of PJI.

RESULTS

Of 7,713 shoulder arthroplasties, cefazolin was administered in 6,879 procedures (89.2%) and non-cefazolin antibiotics consisting of vancomycin (465 procedures [6.0%]), clindamycin (345 procedures [4.5%]), and alternative regimens (24 procedures [0.31%]) were administered in 834 procedures (10.8%). PJIs occurred in 101 shoulder arthroplasties (1.3%), with Cutibacterium acnes as the most common pathogen (44 procedures [43.6%]). PJI-free survivorship was greater in shoulder arthroplasties in which cefazolin was administered compared with those in which non-cefazolin antibiotics were administered, with 0.91% greater survival free of PJI at 1 month, 1.4% at 1 year, and 2.7% at 15 years (p < 0.001). Cefazolin administration, compared with non-cefazolin administration, was associated with a 69% reduction in all-cause PJI risk and a 78% reduction in C. acnes PJI risk (p < 0.001). A higher risk of PJI for both groups was observed with vancomycin; the hazard ratio [HR] was 2.32 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.22 to 4.40; p = 0.010) for all-cause PJI and 2.94 (95% CI, 1.12 to 7.49; p = 0.028) for C. acnes PJI. A higher risk of PJI was also observed for both groups for clindamycin; the HR was 5.07 (95% CI, 2.83 to 9.05; p < 0.001) for all-cause PJI and 8.01 (95% CI, 3.63 to 17.42; p < 0.001) for C. acnes PJI.

CONCLUSIONS

In primary shoulder arthroplasty, cefazolin administration was associated with a significantly lower rate of PJI compared with non-cefazolin alternatives, including both vancomycin and clindamycin. These risk discrepancies were observed across all infectious pathogens and may be considered even greater when C. acnes was the infecting bacterium.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Better diagnostic value of tissue cultures obtained during mini-open and arthroscopic procedures compared with sterile punctures to identify periprosthetic shoulder infections: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to determine the sensitivity and specificity of sterile shoulder needle aspiration and cultures obtained during arthroscopic and mini-open procedures for detecting periprosthetic shoulder infections using tissue cultures from revision surgery as the gold standard.

METHODS

All shoulder arthroplasty patients who underwent a synovial fluid puncture between August 2012 and February 2018 were selected. In addition, arthroplasty patients with cultures obtained during arthroscopic or mini-open procedures between May 2014 and May 2021 were selected. When sterile punctures or biopsy procedures were followed by revision surgery with collection of 6 tissue cultures, patients were included in the study and efficacy measures were calculated.

RESULTS

Fifty-six patients were included in this study (with 57 punctures) and underwent analysis of puncture results after exclusions. Positive puncture results were found for Cutibacterium acnes, Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus hominis, Actinomyces neuii, and Proteus mirabilis. These puncture cultures showed a sensitivity of 20.0% and specificity of 90.6%. From May 2014 to May 2021, 51 biopsy procedures were performed (15 arthroscopic and 36 mini-open); 37 biopsy procedures were included in this study (12 arthroscopic and 25 mini-open) for analysis after exclusions. Positive culture results were found for C acnes, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Staphylococcus saccharolyticus, and Streptococcus species. Arthroscopic biopsy cultures showed a sensitivity of 60.0% and specificity of 85.7%. For the mini-open biopsy cultures, the sensitivity and specificity were 66.7% and 85.7%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Sterile punctures for culture have a low sensitivity and a high specificity for diagnosing periprosthetic shoulder infections. Tissue cultures obtained during mini-open and arthroscopic procedures have a higher sensitivity for detecting periprosthetic shoulder infections.

Perioperative Management in Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

A successful reverse total shoulder arthroplasty requires careful preoperative planning and perioperative management. Preoperative comorbidity risks, perioperative pain management, and postoperative rehabilitation are all critical components of this arthroplasty. The current review examines available literature to guide the perioperative care of the reverse total shoulder arthroplasty patient.

RECENT FINDINGS

One of the most important advances for shoulder arthroplasty in recent years has been heightened awareness of various modalities for perioperative pain management. A number of recent studies have focused on the options for regional blockade as a critical tool for postoperative pain relief and the use of either continuous interscalene blocks or single shot blocks are supported. Additional studies are necessary to define the best local anesthetic agent and delivery mechanism to provide appropriate pain relief with a low side effect profile. Management of the patient throughout the perioperative course is a critical component in achieving better patient outcomes delivering high quality patient care. An orthopedic surgery team focused on perioperative management is better positioned to decrease adverse events and improve patient outcomes after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.

Is Patient-reported Penicillin Allergy Independently Associated with Increased Risk of Prosthetic Joint Infection After Total Joint Arthroplasty of the Hip, Knee, and Shoulder?

BACKGROUND

Patients with a patient-reported penicillin allergy may be at greater risk for postoperative prosthetic joint infection (PJI) after total joint arthroplasty of the hip, knee, or shoulder. The increased risk of PJI in these patients has been attributed to these patients receiving a less-effective perioperative antibiotic. However, prior reports did not fully address the clinical characteristics of these unique patients, who may inherently be at greater risk of having a PJI, which may confound prior findings.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

After controlling for risk factors for PJI such as BMI, anxiety, depression, and other comorbidities, we asked: Are patients with a patient-reported penicillin allergy more likely to have a PJI after THA, TKA, or total shoulder arthroplasty than patients without such a reported allergy?

METHODS

We queried patient records from 2010 to 2017 from a nationwide administrative claims database of 122 million patients to adequately power an investigation comparing the 1-year incidence of PJI after TKA, total shoulder arthroplasty, and THA in patients with patient-reported penicillin allergy versus patients without a patient-reported penicillin allergy. Operative treatments for deep joint infection, identified by Current Procedural Terminology and ICD-9 and ICD-10 codes were used as a surrogate for PJI. Clinical characteristics such as age, sex, BMI, length of stay, and Charlson comorbidity index and specific comorbidities including alcohol abuse, anemia, anxiety, cardiac disease, diabetes, immunocompromised status, rheumatoid arthritis, depression, liver disease, chronic kidney disease, tobacco use, and peripheral vascular disease were queried for each study group. The odds of PJI within 1 year of THA, TKA, or total shoulder arthroplasty were compared using multiple logistic regression after adjusting for potential confounders.

RESULTS

After adjusting for potential confounding factors such as BMI, anxiety, depression and other comorbidities, we found that patient-reported penicillin allergy was independently associated with an increased odds of PJI after TKA (odds ratio 1.3 [95% confidence interval 1.1 to 1.4]; p < 0.01) and total shoulder arthroplasty (OR 3.9 [95% CI 2.7 to 5.4]; p < 0.01). However, patient-reported penicillin allergy was not independently associated with an increased odds of PJI after THA (OR 1.1 [95% CI 0.9 to 1.3]; p = 0.36) after controlling for the same risk factors.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, we found that patients with patient-reported penicillin allergy were at an increased risk for PJI after TKA and total shoulder arthroplasty, which we suspect-but cannot prove-is likely a function of those patients receiving a second-line antibiotic for presurgical prophylaxis. Since prior research has found that many patients listed in medical records as having a penicillin allergy are in fact not allergic to penicillin, we suggest that surgeons consider preoperative allergy testing, such as using an intraoperative test dose, to aid in choosing the most appropriate antibiotic choice before knee or shoulder arthroplasty and to amend patient medical records based on testing results. Future studies should determine whether this additional diagnostic maneuver is cost-effective.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, therapeutic study.

Periprosthetic Infection After Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty: a Review

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Periprosthetic infection is a relatively rare but potentially devastating complication after shoulder arthroplasty. The purpose of this article is to review the incidence, diagnosis, prevention, and management of periprosthetic infections after reverse shoulder arthroplasty, with a focus on literature published within the last 5 years.

RECENT FINDINGS

The 2018 International Consensus Meeting on Musculoskeletal Infection provides us with a framework for the diagnosis and management of periprosthetic infections after shoulder arthroplasty. Reverse shoulder arthroplasty has a higher reported rate of infection compared with anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty. Our current diagnostic tests do not appear to be as sensitive when compared with the hip and knee literature. Similar success has been reported with single and two-stage revision protocols, although prospective comparative data are lacking. The significance of unexpected positive cultures during revision arthroplasty remains unclear. We report current diagnostic and therapeutic options for periprosthetic infection after reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Much of the current literature does not distinguish between anatomic and reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Further high-level studies are warranted to refine these definitions and guide management.

A break-even analysis of benzoyl peroxide and hydrogen peroxide for infection prevention in shoulder arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Newer strategies to decolonize the shoulder of Cutibacterium acnes may hold promise in minimizing the occurrence of infections after shoulder arthroplasty, but little is known about their cost-effectiveness. Break-even models can determine the economic viability of interventions in settings with low outcome event rates that would realistically preclude a randomized clinical trial. We used such modeling to determine the economic viability of benzoyl peroxide and hydrogen peroxide for infection prevention in shoulder arthroplasty.

METHODS

Skin decolonization protocol costs ($11.76 for benzoyl peroxide; $0.96 for hydrogen peroxide), baseline infection rates for shoulder arthroplasty (0.70%), and infection-related care costs ($50,230) were derived from institutional records and the literature. A break-even equation incorporating these variables was developed to determine the absolute risk reduction (ARR) in the infection rate to make prophylactic use economically justified. The number needed to treat was calculated from the ARR.

RESULTS

Topical benzoyl peroxide is considered economically justified if it prevents at least 1 infection out of 4348 shoulder arthroplasties (ARR = 0.023%). Hydrogen peroxide is economically justified if it prevents at least 1 infection out of 50,000 cases (ARR = 0.002%). These protocols remained economically viable at varying unit costs, initial infection rates, and infection-related care costs.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of topical benzoyl peroxide and skin preparations with hydrogen peroxide are highly economically justified practices for infection prevention in shoulder arthroplasty. Efforts to determine drawbacks of routine skin decolonization strategies are warranted as they may change the value analysis.

Strategies to decolonize the shoulder of Cutibacterium acnes: a review of the literature

Cutibacterium acnes is the most prevalent cause of joint infection after shoulder surgery. Current methods for decolonizing this bacterium from the shoulder region have proved ineffective owing to its unique niche within dermal sebaceous glands and hair follicles. When we are making decisions to decolonize the skin of C acnes, the risks associated with decolonization must be balanced by the potential benefits of reduced deep tissue inoculation. The purpose of this review was to describe currently available methods of decolonization and their efficacy.