Viewing perspective malrotation influences angular measurements on lateral radiographs of the scapula

The Critical Shoulder Angle Can be Accurately and Reliably Determined from Three-Dimensional Computed Tomography Images

OBJECTIVE

Anteroposterior (AP) radiographs do not necessarily offer the optimal approach to measuring the critical shoulder angle (CSA) due to the malposition of the scapula. Three-dimensional computed tomography (3D-CT) may offer some advantages, including the ability to rotate the scapula for position alignment and pre-operative planning for reducing CSA. This study aimed to investigate the accuracy and reliability of CSA measurement in 3D-CT and to determine whether there is an association between CSA and rotator cuff tears (RCTs).

METHODS

In this retrospective study we identified 200 patients who received shoulder arthroscopy from 2019 to 2021, including 142 patients (81 females, 61 males) with RCTs and 58 patients (14 females, 44 males) with non-RCTs. For each participant, CSA was measured from standard shoulder AP radiographs and anterior views of 3D-CT of the scapula by two independent assessors. Inter- and intra-observer agreements were assessed by the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). The relationship between the two measurement methodologies was determined by Spearman's correlation coefficient and Bland-Altman plots. Discriminative capacity was calculated by using receiver operating curve (ROC) analyses in the whole cohort and age sub-groups above and below 45 years.

RESULTS

We found perfect inter-observer (ICC >0.96) and intra-observer (ICC >0.97) reliabilities for CSA measurements obtained from the standard AP radiographs and the 3D-CT. There was a strong correlation between the two methods (r = 0.960, P < 0.001). The mean CSA was 31.7° ± 4.2° in the standard AP radiographs and 31.8° ± 4.4° in the 3D-CT (mean difference 0.02°, P = 0.940; bias 0.02°, limits of agreement -2.29° to +2.33°). ROC analysis of the whole cohort showed that the CSA measured in the standard AP radiographs (area under the ROC curve [AUC] = 0.812, P < 0.001) and the 3D-CT (AUC = 0.815, P < 0.001) predicted RCT with high confidence. ROC analysis of patients aged ≥45 years showed that the CSA measured from the standard AP radiographs (AUC = 0.869, P < 0.001) and the 3D-CT (AUC = 0.870, P < 0.001) were very good at predicting RCTs.

CONCLUSION

CSA measured from standard AP radiographs and 3D-CT showed high consistency, and the CSA could be accurately and reliably measured using 3D-CT. CSAs measured from standard AP radiographs and 3D-CT could predict RCTs, especially in patients aged ≥45 years.

Impact of aberrant beam paths on antero-posterior shoulder radiographs in proximal humeral fractures

INTRODUCTION

Accurate radiographic assessment of proximal humeral fractures (PHF) is important as it influences clinical decision-making and predicts clinical outcome. Since aberrant radiographic views might influence the assessment of fracture displacement, it was the goal of this study to investigate the impact of aberrant beam paths on radiographic assessment of PHF.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Ten consecutive patients with a displaced PHF, bilateral computed tomography (CT) scan, and a true clinical AP radiograph were included. Digitally reconstructed radiographs (DRRs) were generated and aberrant beam paths were simulated by rotation of ± 30° around the horizontal (flexion and extension) and vertical axis (internal and external rotation) by increments of 10°. Measurement of the neck-shaft-angle (NSA) and eccentric head index (EHI) addressed humeral angulation and offset, respectively. Paired comparisons determined the influence of aberrant beam paths on both measurements between incremental altered views, and between clinical and digital true AP views. Descriptive statistics assessed the change in Neer classification and recommended treatment.

RESULTS

True AP DRRs approximated the clinical true AP view by a mean difference of 2° for NSA, and a mean difference of 0.12 for EHI. NSA in injured shoulders was most susceptible to malrotation around the vertical axis (p < 0.03), with largest differences seen for internal rotation. Aberrant projections in extension had no influence on NSA (p > 0.70), whereas flexion of ≥ 20° and 30° demonstrated differences in injured and uninjured shoulders, respectively (p < 0.05). EHI was only influenced by malrotation in internal rotation in uninjured shoulders (p < 0.03). Alterations in Neer type occurred at 30° of malrotation in 5 cases, with a change in recommended treatment in 2.

CONCLUSIONS

Humeral angulation and offset measurements on AP radiographs are more susceptible to aberrant beam paths in fractured humeri. Altered radiographic beam paths around the vertical axis showed the most substantial influence on the assessment of PHF, with angular measurements demonstrating larger differences then offset measurements. Beam path alterations of 30° can influence the Neer classification, and might influence fracture displacement-based decisions.

Anterolateral Acromioplasty Does Not Change the Critical Shoulder Angle and Acromion Index in a Clinically Relevant Amount

PURPOSE

Assessment on whether radiographic parameters of the acromion measured in radiographs change significantly after anterolateral acromioplasty.

METHODS

This retrospective study included patients that underwent an arthroscopic anterolateral acromioplasty between January 2014 and September 2020. n = 435 subjects with high-quality preoperative and postoperative radiographs according to Suter-Henninger criteria were included in the final assessment. All measurements were independently performed by the first and second author in a blinded fashion using dicomPACS software: acromion index (AI), critical shoulder angle (CSA), lateral acromial angle (LAA), beta angle, acromio-humeral distance (AHD), Aoki angle, frontal supraspinatus outlet angle (FSOW), and acromion type, according to Bigliani. SPSS software was used for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

The beta angle and the CSA did not significantly change after operation (alpha power 0.32 and 0.11, respectively). In a subgroup analysis of patients with a pathological CSA >35° (n = 194), the CSA changed from 38.62 (range: 35.08-47.52, SD 2.83) to 38.04 (range: 29.18-48.12, SD 3.77) postoperatively (P = .028) (Fig 8). All other parameters changed significantly after operation (AI, AHD, FSOW, and Aoki; P = .001, LAA; P = .039) (Fig. 9). The interobserver and intraobserver reliability was good to excellent in the majority of measured values. Mean patient age was 59.2 years (range: 18.1-87.1; SD 11.3), mean height was 1.73 meters (range: 1,50-1.98, SD 0.09), mean weight was 80.2 kg (range: 37.0-133.0, SD 16.68), and mean body mass index was 26.6 (range: 0.0-46.1, SD 4.73).

CONCLUSION

Anterolateral acromioplasty producing a flat acromion undersurface did not result in a significant change of the CSA in the study population. Pathological preoperative CSA values of >35° were significantly reduced but not to normal values, but only by a small amount that puts the clinical relevance into question.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV, diagnostic study, case series.

Editorial Commentary: Is Your Critical Shoulder Angle Accurate? Only If You Can Verify That You Have the Correct Images

The critical shoulder angle (CSA) has been the focus of significant research related to the etiology and prognosis of rotator cuff tears in recent years, but the accuracy of CSA measurements on plain anteroposterior (Grashey) radiographs has been questioned. Research to better understand what qualifies as a "tolerable" radiograph for reliable measurement of the CSA can inform best practices for obtaining plain radiographs. Optimal measurements rely on optimal images, and knowing how much room for error there is regarding malrotation provides surgeons with unbiased criteria to rule out inadequate images.

The Ratio of the Transverse to Longitudinal Diameter of the Glenoid Projection Is of Good Predictive Value for Defining the Reliability of Critical Shoulder Angle in Nonstandard Anteroposterior Radiographs

PURPOSE

To investigate (1) whether measurement of the critical shoulder angle (CSA) is still reliable in some nonstandard anteroposterior radiographs; and (2) whether the ratio of the transverse to longitudinal diameter of the glenoid projection (RTL) could be used to determine the reliability of the CSA in nonstandard anteroposterior radiographs.

METHODS

The authors analyzed radiology records from 2017 to 2019 for patients with computed tomography (CT) scans of the shoulder. According to the Suter-Henninger classification system, each CT scan underwent 3-dimensional (3D) reconstructions to obtain 8 digitally reconstructed radiographs (DRRs), including 1 type A1 film and 7 type D1 films with different rotation angles. CSA and RTL were measured on all films, and 2 blinded reviewers evaluated DRRs. The relationship between RTL and CSA was determined by Pearson correlation test. The threshold value was determined by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses using RTL as predictors and defined reliable CSA as criterion in the logistic regression. Intra- and inter-rater reliability were assessed by the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Discriminative capacity was calculated with ROC analyses and area under the curve (AUC). An optimal measurement cutoff with resultant sensitivity and specificity was calculated.

RESULTS

A total of 86 patients were included, mean age 40.70 ± 18.25 years, 19 of whom had rotator cuff tears (RCTs) and 67 without RCTs. Spearman's correlation test revealed that the deviation of CSA was positively correlated with RTL, correlation coefficient 0.544 (P < .001) in all patients and 0.686 (P < .001) only in patients with RCTs. ROC analysis of all patients showed that the AUC of the RTL was 0.90, and the optimal cutoff point was 0.25 (sensitivity 88%, specificity 87%). ROC analysis only of patients with RCTs showed that the AUC of the RTL was 0.95, and the optimal cutoff point was 0.22 (sensitivity 95%, specificity 92%).

CONCLUSION

The ratio of the transverse to longitudinal diameter of the glenoid projection (RTL) is of good predictive value in defining the reliability of the CSA in malposition films. Based on the results, the CSA can be considered reliable if its RTL is <0.25.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III, retrospective cohort study investigating a diagnostic test.