Neurologic deficit after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: correlation with distalization

Reverse shoulder arthroplasty design-inlay vs. onlay: does it really make a difference?

BACKGROUND

The design of reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) implants has evolved significantly over the past 50 years. Today there are many options available that differ in design of the glenoid and humeral components, fixation methods, sizes, and modularity. With respect to the humeral component, the literature has generally focused on the differences between inlay and onlay designs and the potential impact on outcomes. However, inlay and onlay design represents only one factor of many.

METHODS

It is our hypothesis that separating onlay and inlay designs into 2 distinct entities is an oversimplification as there can be a wide overlap of the 2 designs, depending on surgical technique and the implant selected. As such, the differences between inlay and onlay designs should be measured in absolute terms-meaning combined distalization and lateralization.

RESULTS

By reviewing the many factors that can contribute to the glenosphere-humerus relationship, the role of inlay and onlay humeral designs as an important distinguishing feature is shown to be limited. Preliminary studies suggest that the amount of distalization and lateralization of the construct may be the most accurate method of describing the differences in the constructs.

CONCLUSIONS

Inlay and onlay humeral component design represents only one factor of many that may impact outcomes. A more accurate method of defining specific design and technique factors in RSA is the degree of lateralization and distalization.

Convertible-platform shoulder arthroplasty

Background

Shoulder arthroplasty has become an increasingly common procedure used to treat degenerative, inflammatory, and traumatic conditions of the glenohumeral joint. With a significant increase in primary anatomic and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty, revision procedures have likewise increased. Updates in shoulder arthroplasty have allowed for the convertibility of implants, which allows for the retention of both glenoid and humeral components during revision surgery. This review aims to highlight the epidemiology, indications, and outcomes of convertible-platform total shoulder arthroplasty procedures.

Methods

A review of the current literature surrounding convertible-platform shoulder arthroplasty was completed to highlight the advantages and disadvantages of commercially available instrumentation and implant systems as well as their outcomes.

Discussion

Leading causes of shoulder arthroplasty revision surgery include glenoid failure, implant instability, and rotator cuff dysfunction. Variations in implant design between inlay and onlay humeral components and metal-backed glenoid components are important considerations at the time of revision surgery. Advantages of convertible-platform systems include increased efficiency and decreased complications during revision procedures as well as shorter recovery, lower cost, and better functional outcomes. Limitations of convertible systems include poorly positioned components during the index procedure, excessive soft-tissue tensioning, and problems associated with metal-backed glenoid implants. Changes in arm length have also been documented. These findings indicate the benefit of additional research and design to improve the effectiveness and utility of convertible-platform shoulder arthroplasty systems.

Glenoid lateralization in reverse shoulder arthroplasty: metal vs. bone offset in different implant designs

Background

Higher bone or metal glenoid offset in reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) reduces scapular notching, improves range of motion (ROM), and reduces postoperative instability. This retrospective multicenter study compared two implant designs to evaluate the short-term clinical and radiologic results of bone increased offset RSA (BIO-RSA) and metal increased offset RSA (MIO-RSA) in reverse shoulder. We hypothesized no difference between groups.

Methods

This study analyzed n = 62 BIO-RSA and n = 90 MIO-RSA cases with a mean follow-up of 29.7 ± 6.0 months (BIO-RSA, range 24-49 months) and 24.0 ± 1.1 months (MIO-RSA, range 22-28 months). A 145°-onlay humeral stem was utilized in BIO-RSA cases, while a 135°-semi-inlay humeral stem was implanted in all MIO-RSA cases. Preoperative and postoperative radiologic imaging was reviewed to identify signs of scapular notching. Additionally, lateralization was evaluated according to Erickson et al. The constant score, subjective shoulder value, and ROM were evaluated during the baseline and follow-up consultations, and the findings of both groups were subsequently compared.

Results

Scapular notching was observed in 7.0% (n = 8) of MIO-RSA cases and 8.1% (n = 5) of BIO-RSA cases (P = .801). MIO-group had a higher lateralization angle (P = .020) and the BIO-group had a higher distalization angle (P = .005). At baseline, mean constant score in the MIO-RSA group was higher than in the BIO-RSA group (P < .001), and it significantly increased to 67.8 ± 12.1P (MIO-RSA) and 69.5 ± 12.3P (BIO-RSA) to a similar level (P = .399). ROM improved in both groups with no significant difference between the two groups at follow-up.

Conclusion

BIO-RSA and MIO-RSA in two distinct implant designs provide comparable short-term outcomes with a similar increase in shoulder function with notable variations in the lateralization and distalization angles between both implants. Scapular notching was rarely seen and unaffected by the method of glenoid lateralization. Follow-up investigations of both techniques are necessary to complement and track changes in the long-term outcome.

Radial and median nerves distal peripheral tension after reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a cadaveric study

Background

Peripheral nerve injury is a recognized complication after reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) that has mainly been studied at the level of the brachial plexus and its proximal branches. However, the impact of RSA on distal peripheral nerves and the influence of elbow and wrist position is not known. This cadaveric study aimed to analyze the effect of RSA implantation and upper limb position on tension in the distal median and radial nerves. The hypothesis was that RSA increased distal nerve tension, which could be further affected by elbow and wrist position.

Methods

12 upper limbs in 9 full fresh-frozen cadavers were dissected. Nerve tension was measured in the median nerve at the level of the proximal arm, elbow, and distal forearm, and in the radial nerve at the level of the elbow, using a customized three-point tensiometer. Measurements were carried out before and after RSA implantation, using a semi-inlay implant (Medacta, Castel San Pietro, Switzerland). Two different configurations were tested, using the smallest and largest available implant sizes. Three upper-limb key positions were considered (plexus at risk, plexus relief, and neutral), from which the effect of elbow and wrist position was further tested.

Results

RSA implantation significantly increased median and radial nerve tension throughout the upper limb. The distal nerve segments were particularly dependent on elbow and wrist position. The plexus at risk position induced the most tension in all nerve segments, especially with the large implant configuration. On the other hand, the plexus relief position induced the least amount of tension. Flexing the elbow was the most efficient way to decrease nerve tension in all tested nerve segments and key positions. Wrist flexion significantly decreased nerve tension in the median nerve, whereas wrist extension decreased tension in the radial nerve.

Conclusion

RSA significantly increases tension in the median and radial nerves and makes them more susceptible to wrist and elbow positioning. The mechanism behind distal peripheral neuropathy after RSA may thus result from increased compression of tensioned nerves against anatomical fulcrums rather than nerve elongation alone. Elbow flexion was the most effective way to decrease nerve tension, while elbow extension should be avoided when implanting the humeral component. Further studies are needed to assess the ulnar nerve.

Optimising safe margins in shoulder surgeries: a cadaveric study on brachial plexus nerves with anthropometric and movement correlation

PURPOSE

Shoulder surgeries, vital for diverse pathologies, pose a risk of iatrogenic nerve damage. Existing literature lacks diverse bone landmark-specific nerve position data. The purpose of this study is to address this gap by investigating such relationships.

METHOD

This cadaveric study examines axillary, radial and suprascapular nerves' relation with acromion, coracoid and greater tuberosity of the humerus (GT). It also correlates this data with humeral lengths and explores nerve dynamics in relation to arm positions.

RESULTS

The mean distance from the axillary nerve to (i) GT was 4.38 cm (range 3.32-5.44, SD 0.53), (ii) acromion was 6.42 cm (range 5.03-7.8, SD 0.694) and (iii) coracoid process was 4.3 cm (range 2.76-5.84, SD 0.769). Abduction brought the nerve closer by 0.36 cm, 0.35 cm and 0.53 cm, respectively. The mean distance from radial nerve to (i) GT was 5.46 cm (range 3.78-7.14, SD 0.839), (ii) acromion was 7.82 cm (range 5.4-10.24, SD 1.21) and (iii) tip of the coracoid process was 6.09 cm (range 4.07-8.11 cm, SD 1.01). The mean distance from the suprascapular nerve to the acromion was 4.2 cm (range 3.1-5.4, SD 0.575). The mean humeral length was noted to be 27.83 cm (range 25.3-30.7, SD 1.13). There was no significant correlation between these distances and humeral lengths.

CONCLUSION

It is essential to exercise caution to avoid axillary nerve damage during the abduction manoeuvre, as its distance from the greater tuberosity and tip of the coracoid process has shown a significant reduction. The safe margins, in relation to the length of the humerus and consequently the patient's stature, exhibit no significant variation. In situations where the greater tuberosity (GT) and the border of the acromion are inaccessible due to reasons such as trauma, the tip of the coracoid process can serve as a dependable bone landmark for establishing a secure surgical margin.

Robert H. Cofield, MD, Award for Best Oral Presentation 2023: Up to 8 mm of glenoid-sided lateralization does not increase the risk of acromial or scapular spine stress fracture following reverse shoulder arthroplasty with a 135° inlay humeral component

BACKGROUND

Glenoid-sided lateralization in reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) decreases bony impingement and improves rotational range of motion, but has been theorized to increase the risk of acromial or scapular spine fractures (ASFs). The purpose of this study was to assess if glenoid-sided lateralization even up to 8 mm increases the risk for stress fracture following RSA with a 135° inlay humeral component.

METHODS

A retrospective review was performed from a multicenter prospectively collected database on patients who underwent primary RSA from 2015 to 2021. All RSAs were performed with a 135° inlay humeral component. Varying amounts of glenoid lateralization were used from 0 to 8 mm. Preoperative radiographs were reviewed for the presence of acromial thinning, acromiohumeral distance (AHD), and inclination. Postoperative implant position (distalization, lateralization, and inclination) as well as the presence of ASF was evaluated on minimum 1-year postoperative radiographs. Regression analyses were performed on component and clinical variables to assess for factors predictive of ASF.

RESULTS

Acromial or scapular spine fractures were identified in 26 of 470 shoulders (5.5%). Glenoid-sided lateralization was not associated with ASF risk (P = .890). Furthermore, the incidence of fracture did not vary based on glenoid-sided lateralization (0-2 mm, 7.4%; 4 mm, 5.6%; 6 mm, 4.4%; 8 mm, 6.0%; P > .05 for all comparisons). RSA on the dominant extremity was predictive of fracture (odds ratio [OR] 2.21, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.20-5.75; P = .037), but there was no relationship between patient age, sex, preoperative acromial thinning, or diagnosis and risk of fracture. Although there was no difference in mean postoperative AHD between groups (P = .443), the pre- to postoperative delta AHD was higher in the stress fracture group (2.0 ± 0.7 cm vs. 1.7 ± 0.7 cm; P = .015). For every centimeter increase in delta AHD, there was a 121% increased risk for fracture (OR 2.21, 95% CI 1.33-3.68; P = .012). Additionally, for every 1-mm increase in inferior glenosphere overhang, there was a 19% increase in fracture risk (P = .025).

CONCLUSION

Up to 8 mm of glenoid-sided metallic lateralization does not appear to increase the risk of ASF when combined with a 135° inlay humeral implant. Humeral distalization increases the risk of ASF, particularly when there is a larger change between pre- and postoperative AHD or higher inferior glenosphere overhang. In cases of pronounced preoperative superior humeral migration, it may be a consideration to avoid excessive postoperative distalization, but minimizing bony impingement via glenoid-sided lateralization appears to be safe.

Neuropathy of the suprascapular and axillary nerves in rotator cuff arthropathy: a prospective electrodiagnostic study

PURPOSE

Prevalence of axillary (AN) and/or suprascapular (SSN) neuropathy in rotator cuff tear arthropathy (RCTA) is unknown. We aimed to prospectively evaluate for preoperative neurodiagnostic abnormalities in order to determine their prevalence, location, and influence on reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) outcomes.

METHODS

Patients who underwent RSA for RCTA were prospectively included. An electromyography and nerve conduction study were performed pre and post-surgery. Clinical situation: VAS, Relative Constant-Murley Score (rCMS) and ROM over a minimum of two years follow-up.

RESULTS

Forty patients met the inclusion criteria; mean follow-up was 28.4 months (SD 4.4). Injuries in RCTA were present in 83.9% (77.4% in AN and 45.2% in SSN). There were no differences on preoperative VAS, ROM, and rCMS between patients with and without preoperative nerve injuries. Four acute postoperative neurological injuries were registered under chronic preoperative injuries. Six months after RSA, 69% of preoperative neuropathies had improved (82.14% chronic injuries and 77.7% disuse injuries). No differences in improvement between disuse and chronic injuries were found, but patients with preoperative neuropathy that had not improved at the postoperative electromyographic study at six months, scored worse on the VAS (1.44 vs 2.66; p .14) and rCMS (91.6 vs 89.04; p .27).

CONCLUSIONS

The frequency of axillary and suprascapular neuropathies in RCTA is much higher than expected. Most of these injuries improve after surgery, with almost complete neurophysiological recovery and little functional impact on RSA. However, those patients with preoperative neuropathies and absence of neurophysiological improvement six months after surgery have lower functional results.

Biomechanical Characteristics of Glenosphere Orientation Based on Tilting Angle and Overhang Changes in Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty

Background

Glenoid position and inclination are important factors in protecting against scapular notching, which is the most common complication that directly affects the longevity of reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA). This study aimed to investigate the biomechanical characteristics of glenosphere orientation, comparing neutral tilt, inferior overhang with an eccentric glenosphere at the same placement of baseplate, and inferior tilt after 10° inferior reaming in the lower part of the glenoid in RSA.

Methods

Nine cadaveric shoulders were tested with 5 combinations of customized glenoid components: a centric glenosphere was combined with a standard baseplate (group A); an eccentric glenosphere to provide 4-mm inferior overhang than the centric glenosphere was combined with a standard baseplate (group B); a centric glenosphere was combined with a wedge-shaped baseplate tilted inferiorly by 10° with the same center of rotation (group C); an eccentric glenosphere was attached to a wedge-shaped baseplate (group D); and 10° inferior reaming was performed on the lower part of the glenoid to apply 10° inferior tilt, with a centric glenosphere secured to the standard baseplate for simulation of clinical tilt (group E). Impingement-free angles for adduction, abduction, forward flexion, external rotation, and internal rotation were measured. The capability of the deltoid moment arm for abduction and forward flexion, deltoid length, and geometric analysis for adduction engagement were evaluated.

Results

Compared with neutral tilt, inferior tilt at the same position showed no significant difference in impingement-free angle, moment arm capability, and deltoid length. However, group D resulted in better biomechanical properties than a central position, regardless of inferior tilt. Group E demonstrated a greater range of adduction, internal and external rotation, and higher abduction and forward flexion capability with distalization, compared to corresponding parameters for inferior tilt with a customized wedge-shaped baseplate.

Conclusions

A 10° inferior tilt of the glenosphere, without changing the position of the baseplate, had no benefit in terms of the impingement-free angle and deltoid moment arm. However, an eccentric glenosphere had a significant advantage, regardless of inferior tilt. Inferior tilt through 10° inferior reaming showed better biomechanical results than neutral tilt due to the distalization effect.

Comparison of Functional Outcomes and Complications of Inlay and Onlay Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty in Neer Type 4 Proximal Humerus Fractures and Cuff Tear Arthropathy: A Multicentric Study

Background

This multicenter retrospective study was conducted with the objective of comparing the outcomes and complications between inlay and onlay reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) in patients presenting Neer Type 4 proximal humerus fractures and cuff tear arthropathy. The primary aim of this investigation was to assess and juxtapose the clinical as well as functional outcomes of individuals who underwent onlay reverse shoulder arthroplasty with those who underwent inlay reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

Methods

A retrospective cohort study was conducted, involving patients who had undergone reverse shoulder arthroplasty between the period of 2016 and 2022. The study divided the population into two groups: Group A received inlay humeral components, while Group B received onlay humeral components. Functional outcomes were evaluated using the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) and Constant scores. Range of motion, infection, periprosthetic fractures, and nerve injuries were also assessed.

Results

The study included 67 patients in Group A and 62 patients in Group B. Group A had significantly better functional outcomes, as indicated by higher ASES and Constant scores (p < 0.05). Group A also had greater shoulder joint motion (p < 0.05). Periprosthetic fractures were significantly more common in Group B (p < 0.05). However, complication rates, including infection and instability, did not significantly differ between the groups (p > 0.05). Nerve injuries occurred in both groups, with slightly higher occurrence in Group B.

Conclusion

Inlay humeral components in reverse shoulder arthroplasty for Neer Type 4 fractures and cuff tear arthropathy resulted in better functional outcomes, increased range of motion, and lower incidence of periprosthetic fractures compared to onlay components. Onlay components showed potential advantages in reducing instability rates. Further studies with larger samples and standardized protocols are needed to confirm these findings.

Managing rotator cuff tear arthropathy: a role for cuff tear arthropathy hemiarthroplasty as well as reverse total shoulder arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Disabling cuff tear arthropathy (CTA) is commonly managed with reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA). However, for patients with CTA having preserved active elevation, cuff tear arthropathy hemiarthroplasty (CTAH) may offer a cost-effective alternative that avoids the complications unique to RSA. We sought to determine the characteristics and outcomes of a series of patients with CTA managed with these procedures.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 103 patients with CTA treated with shoulder arthroplasty, the type of which was determined by the patient's ability to actively elevate the arm. Outcome measures included the change in the Simple Shoulder Test (SST), the percent maximum improvement in SST (%MPI), and the percentage of patients exceeding the minimal clinically important difference for the change in SST and %MPI. Postoperative x-rays were evaluated to assess the positions of the center of rotation and the greater tuberosity for each implant.

RESULTS

Forty-four percent of the 103 patients were managed with CTAH while 56% were managed with RSA. Both arthroplasties resulted in clinically significant improvement. Patients having RSA improved from a mean preoperative SST score of 1.7 (interquartile range [IQR], 0.0-3.0) to a postoperative score of 6.3 (IQR, 2.3-10.0) (P < .01). Patients having CTAH improved from a preoperative SST score of 3.1 (IQR, 1.0-4.0) to a postoperative score of 7.6 (IQR, 5.0-10.) (P < .001). These improvements exceeded the minimal clinically important difference. Instability accounted for most of the RSA complications; however, it did not account for any CTAH complications. The postoperative position of the center of rotation and greater tuberosity on anteroposterior radiographs did not correlate with the clinical outcomes for either procedure.

CONCLUSION

For 103 patients with CTA, clinically significant improvement was achieved with appropriately indicated CTAH and RSA. In view of the lower cost of the CTAH implant, it may provide a cost-effective alternative to RSA for patients with retained active elevation.

Can Distalisation and Lateralisation Shoulder Angles in Reverse Arthroplasty Interfere with the Functional Results in Patients with Rotator Cuff Arthropathy?

Objective:  To evaluate the influence of radiographic values on clinical and functional results in patients treated with reverse arthroplasty for rotator cuff arthropathy (RCA) using a lateralized design. Methods:  A retrospective analysis was performed. Patient demographics were recorded, as well as preoperative and postoperative range of motion. Function was calculated using the Constant-Murley score both before and after the procedure. Pre and postoperative anteroposterior and axial radiographs of the affected shoulder were analysed. In the preoperative images, the following was calculated: acromiohumeral distance (AHD) and lateral humeral offset (LHO). Postoperative measurements included: AHD, LHO, distalization shoulder angle (DSA) and lateralisation shoulder angle (LSA). Linear regression and quadratic regression analysis was performed to determine their degree of association with final functional outcomes. By applying a quadratic regression analysis and ROC curves, the cut-off values were determined with respect to the above-mentioned angles and the positive predictive value was calculated. Results:  The greater anterior elevation (AE) ranges were found with DSA between 40-45° and LSA among 80°- 90°, while better ABD was observed with LSA of 90-100°. Preoperative AHD was correlated to RE (r s :0.47; p:0.049). Postoperative AHD was found to be in a directly proportional relationship with AE (r s :0.49; p:0.03). Postoperative ABD showed an inverse linear regression with preoperative AHD (r s : -0.44, p:0.047). LSA and DSA were inversely related. Conclusion:  We found that a DSA between 40-45° and a LSA of 80-100° could lead to better range of motion regarding AE and ABD in patients with rotator cuff arthropathy treated with RSA.

Suprascapular nerve injury after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: correlation with screw out of vault penetration and functional situation: prospective study

BACKGROUND

Baseplate screws have been suggested as a possible cause of suprascapular neuropathy after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. This study aims to investigate the association between screw penetration out of the vault, electromyographic study, and the clinical outcomes.

METHODS

A total of 31 patients who underwent reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for cuff tear arthropathy were prospectively enrolled. They were followed up for a minimum of 24 months. All patients underwent computed tomography 6 months postoperatively to determine the extraosseous position of the screws (perforation of the second bone cortex and protrusion into the supra- or infraspinatus fossa). Electrodiagnostic evaluation was performed preoperatively and postoperatively to stablish any relation between cortex perforation of the screw and suprascapular nerve (SSN) injury. Clinical outcomes pre- and postoperatively (Constant score, ranges of motion, and visual analog scale) of patients with and without documented injury were recorded.

RESULTS

A total of 14 patients (45.2%) had an abnormal preoperative SSN electrodiagnostic study (chronic or disuse injuries), and 6 patients (19.4%) had an abnormal postoperative study (acute injury). Of the 6 patients, 2 cases appeared over the pre-existing lesion and 4 appeared over an intact preoperative nerve, all of them affecting the infraspinatus branch of the SSN. Perforation of the second cortex was detected for 60% of superior screws and 40% of posterior screws. The mean lengths of the superior and posterior screws were 30 and 18.2 mm, respectively. Patients with screw perforation of the second cortex were assessed as having a high risk of nerve injury (40% vs. 9.5%).

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative SSN injuries do not have a significant clinical impact and do not predispose to an acute postoperative SSN lesion. The Constant score and visual analog scale score for patients with acute SSN injuries were not statistically different from those without SSN injury. The extraosseous position of the screw increases the probability of an SSN injury to 31%. This risk is higher with the posterior screw, which leads us to question whether it is really necessary to use it.

The association between humeral lengthening and clinical outcomes after reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relationship between humeral lengthening and clinical outcomes after reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) with stratification based on measurement method and implant design.

METHODS

This systematic review was performed using PRISMA-P guidelines. PubMed/Medline, Cochrane Trials, and Embase were queried for articles evaluating the relationship between humeral lengthening and clinical outcomes inclusive of range of motion (ROM), strength, outcome scores, and pertinent complications (acromial and scapular spine fractures, nerve injury) after RSA. The relationship between humeral lengthening and clinical outcomes was reported descriptively overall and stratified by measurement method and implant design (globally medialized vs. lateralized). A positive association was defined as increased humeral lengthening being associated with greater ROM, outcome scores, or a greater incidence of complications, whereas a negative association denoted that increased humeral lengthening was associated with poorer ROM, outcome scores, or a lower incidence of complications. Meta-analysis was performed to compare humeral lengthening between patients with and without fractures of the acromion or scapular spine.

RESULTS

Twenty-two studies were included. Humeral lengthening was assessed as the acromiohumeral distance (AHD), the distance from the acromion to the greater tuberosity (AGT), the acromion to the deltoid tuberosity (ADT), and the acromion to the distal humerus (ADH). Of 11 studies that assessed forward elevation, a positive association with humeral lengthening was found in 6, a negative association was found in 1, and 4 studies reported no association. Of studies assessing internal rotation (n = 9), external rotation (n = 7), and abduction (n = 4), all either identified a positive or lack of association with humeral lengthening. Studies assessing outcome scores (n = 11) found either a positive (n = 5) or no (n = 6) association with humeral lengthening. Of the studies that assessed fractures of the acromion and/or scapular spine (n = 6), 2 identified a positive association with humeral lengthening, 1 identified a negative association, and 3 identified no association. The single study that assessed the incidence of nerve injury identified a positive association with humeral lengthening. Meta-analysis was possible for AGT (n = 2) and AHD (n = 2); greater humeral lengthening was found in patients with fractures for studies using the AGT (mean difference 4.5 mm, 95% CI 0.7-8.3) but not the AHD. Limited study inclusion and heterogeneity prohibited identification of trends based on method of measuring humeral lengthening and implant design.

CONCLUSION

The relationship between humeral lengthening and clinical outcomes after RSA remains unclear and requires future investigation using a standardized assessment method.

Long-Term Results of Primary Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty for Massive, Irreparable Rotator Cuff Tears Without Glenohumeral Arthritis with a Mean Follow up of 9.4 Years

Background

The aim of this single-center study was to analyze the long-term clinical results of reverse shoulder arthroplasty in patients with massive, irreparable rotator cuff tears without glenohumeral arthritis.

Methods

A retrospective cohort study of 105 patients (115 shoulders) was conducted. The mean age of the patient group was 76 years (range, 65 to 87 years). The mean clinical follow-up was 9.4 years (range, 5 to 17 years). Pain, range of motion, and complication rates were analyzed pre-operatively and at the last follow-up.

Results

The mean Constant-Murley score increased from 29 points (range, 21 to 34 points) preoperatively to 68.1 points (range, 57 to 81 points) postoperatively (p<0.05). Scapular notching was present in 50 shoulders (43.5%) and it was grade 1 or 2 in 47 of 115 cases (40.9%) and grade 3 or 4 in 3 of 115 cases (2.6%). Complications occurred in 19 patients (17%). Seven patients (6%) underwent revision surgery. The mean satisfaction rate was 94%.

Conclusions

Reverse shoulder arthroplasty is a viable treatment for massive, irreparable rotator cuff tears without glenohumeral arthritis with satisfactory clinical outcomes and low complication and reoperation rates with a mean follow up of 9.4 years after surgery.

How common is nerve injury after reverse shoulder arthroplasty? A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Nerve injury following reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) is a known risk factor with wide ranging incidences reported. This systematic review evaluates the overall incidence of nerve injury following primary and revision RSA and summarizes the characteristics of the nerve injuries reported in the current literature.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed using separate database searches (Pubmed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane) following the PRISMA guidelines. Search criteria included the title terms "reverse shoulder," "reverse total shoulder," "inverted shoulder," and "inverted total shoulder" with publication dates ranging from 01/01/2010 to 01/01/2022. Studies that reported neurological injuries and complications were included and evaluated for primary RSA, revision RSA, number of nerve injuries, and which nerves were affected.

RESULTS

After exclusion, our systematic review consisted of 188 articles. A total of 40,146 patients were included, with 65% female. The weighted mean age was 70.3 years. The weighted mean follow-up was 35.4 months. The rate of nerve injury after RSA was 1.3% (510 of 40,146 RSAs). The rate of injury was greater in revision RSA compared to primary RSA (2.4% vs. 1.3%). Nerve injury was most common in RSAs done for a primary diagnosis of acute proximal humerus fracture (4.0%), followed by cuff tear arthropathy (3.0%), DJD (2.6%), and inflammatory arthritis (1.7%). Massive rotator cuff tears and post-traumatic arthritis cases had the lowest nerve injury rates (1.0% and 1.4%, respectively). The axillary nerve was the most commonly reported nerve that was injured in both primary and revision RSA (0.6%), followed by the ulnar nerve (0.26%) and median nerve (0.23%). Brachial plexus injury was reported in 0.19% of overall RSA cases.

CONCLUSION

Based on current English literature, nerve injuries occur at a rate of 1.3% after primary RSA compared with 2.4% after revision RSA. The most common nerve injury was to the axillary nerve (0.64%), with the most common operative diagnosis associated with nerve injury after RSA being acute proximal humerus fracture (4.0%). Surgeons should carefully counsel patients prior to surgery regarding the risk of nerve injury.

Evaluation of the Painful Total Shoulder Arthroplasty

Despite the overall success of anatomic and reverse total shoulder arthroplasties (aTSA and rTSA), some patients continue to have or develop pain postoperatively. As the number of shoulder arthroplasties continues to increase in the United States, it is important that surgeons are able to recognize, diagnose, and treat the various pathologies. Some painful etiologies are specific to either aTSA or rTSA, and others can occur with both implant types. Infections, stiffness, neurologic syndromes, polyethylene wear, aseptic implant loosening, and metal allergies occur, regardless of implant choice. However, after an aTSA, subscapularis repair failure, superior rotator cuff tear, and joint overstuffing can result in shoulder pain. After a rTSA, specific causes of postoperative pain include instability, scapular notching, acromial or scapular spine fractures, subcoracoid pain, and neurologic injury. Regardless of the diagnosis, the surgeon must be methodical in the evaluation and, when appropriate, use blood work, advanced imaging studies, joint aspirations, shoulder arthroscopy, and nerve studies. Once diagnosed, appropriate treatment should be undertaken to resolve the cause of the pain or at least minimize the effect of the pain on the patient's outcome.

[Conversion of anatomic to reverse shoulder arthroplasty : Does it make sense?]

We can observe increasing numbers for the implantation of shoulder endoprostheses in developed industrial countries. This is accompanied by a certain number of revision surgeries. The conversion to reverse arthroplasty systems is by far the most common revision procedure. Depending on the primary implant and the individual situation, the surgical effort and consumption of resources can be substantial. Particularly favorable revision scenarios exist in the conversion of stemless primary implants that are part of a platform system and allow a partial exchange and easy conversion from anatomical to reverse implants.

Influence of humeral lengthening on clinical outcomes in reverse shoulder arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Deltoid tensioning secondary to humeral lengthening after reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) is commonly theorized to be crucial to improving range of motion (ROM) but may predispose patients to acromial/scapular spine fractures and neurologic injury. Clinical evidence linking patient outcomes to humeral lengthening is limited. This study assesses the relationship between humeral lengthening and clinical outcomes after RSA.

METHODS

A single institution review of 284 RSAs performed in 265 patients was performed. Humeral lengthening was defined as the difference in the subacromial height preoperatively to postoperatively as measured on Grashey radiographs. The subacromial height was measured as the vertical difference between the most inferolateral aspect of the acromion and the most superior aspect of the greater tuberosity. The relationship between humeral lengthening and clinical outcomes was assessed on a continuous basis. Secondarily, clinical outcomes were assessed using a dichotomous definition of humeral lengthening (≤25 vs. >25mm) based on prior clinical and biomechanical work purporting a correlation with clinical outcomes. Improvement exceeding the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and substantial clinical benefit (SCB) for ROM and outcome scores after RSA were also compared.

RESULTS

Humeral lengthening demonstrated a nonlinear relationship with postoperative ROM, clinical outcome scores, and shoulder strength and their improvement preoperatively to postoperatively. Furthermore, there were minimal differences in ROM measures, outcome scores, and shoulder strength when stratified using the dichotomous definition of humeral lengthening. No difference in the proportion of patients exceeding the MCID or SCB when stratified by humeral lengthening ≤25 vs. >25mm was found. There was no difference in humeral lengthening in patients with versus without complications.

CONCLUSION

No clear relationship between humeral lengthening and clinical outcomes was identified. The previously purported 25mm threshold for humeral lengthening did not predict improved patient outcomes. Outcomes after RSA are multifactorial; the relationship between humeral lengthening and outcomes is likely confounded by other patient and surgical factors.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV; Case Series.

Prevalence, management, and outcomes of nerve injury after shoulder arthroplasty: a case-control study and review of the literature

Background

Neurologic injury is a rare and potentially devastating complication of shoulder arthroplasty. Patients typically present with a mixed plexopathy or mononeuropathy, most commonly affecting the axillary and radial nerves. Given the paucity of studies available on the topic, our goal was to elucidate the prevalence of nerve injury after shoulder arthroplasty and to describe the treatment course and outcomes of neurologic injuries.

Methods

This is a retrospective case-control study performed at a single, urban, academic institution. Consecutive patients who underwent anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) or reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) by a single surgeon from 2014 to 2020 were reviewed, and patients with a documented nerve injury were identified. A control group of patients without nerve injury were selected in a 2:1 ratio controlling for age and procedure type (TSA vs. RSA; primary vs. revision). Data collected included demographics, comorbidities as per the Charlson Comorbidity Index, radiographic evaluations, surgical and implant details, patient-reported outcome measures, and perioperative complications.

Results

Of 923 patients, 33 (3.6%) sustained an iatrogenic nerve injury: 10 (2.1%) after TSA, 23 (5.0%) after RSA, and 3 (7.8%) after revision arthroplasty. Axillary mononeuropathy was most common (42%), followed by brachial plexopathies (18%). There was no significant difference in age, sex, race, body mass index, and preoperative diagnoses between groups. Patients with nerve injury had fewer comorbidities (Charlson Comorbidity Index <3, 33 vs. 65%, P<.001). Patients with nerve injury had higher rates of cervical spine pathology (15 vs. 6%; P = .15) and increased postoperative lateralization (8.9 mm [7.2] vs. 5.5 mm [7.3]; P<.06). The majority (91%) were managed with observation alone. Three (9%) underwent an additional procedure: carpal tunnel release (1, 3%), ulnar nerve decompression (1, 3%), and ulnar nerve transposition (1, 3%) for peripheral compressive neuropathies. At the final follow-up, 19 (57%) nerves fully recovered, and 14 (43%) showed mild residual sensorimotor dysfunction. The mean time to first sign of recovery and ultimate recovery were 11 (7.2) and 36 (23.5) weeks, respectively. At the final follow-up, patients with nerve injury performed worse on patient-reported outcomes, including visual analog score pain (2.2 vs. 1.0, P<.001), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score (67.8 vs. 84.8, P<.001), and Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation scores (62 vs. 77, P = .009).

Discussion

Nerve injury after shoulder arthroplasty is rare, occurring in 3.6% of our patient population. Axillary mononeuropathy and brachial plexopathies are the most common. Most patients can be managed expectantly with observation and will recover at least partial nerve function, although clinical outcomes remain inferior to those without nerve complication.

Inlay versus onlay humeral design for reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Since the introduction of the Grammont-style reverse total shoulder arthroplasty, the humeral stem design has been modified with improved clinical outcomes. Two distinct humeral designs have been used extensively: the inlay design, in which the humeral tray is seated within the metaphysis, and the onlay design, in which the humeral tray sits on the metaphysis at the level of the humeral neck cut. The purpose of this systematic review was to determine whether there are differences in clinical outcomes and complication rates between these designs.

METHODS

The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were used to perform this systematic review. A search of MEDLINE, PubMed, and Embase was performed to identify all studies comparing the clinical results of both humeral designs. Primary outcomes included patient-reported outcome measures, shoulder range of motion, and incidence of complications.

RESULTS

From the 156 identified publications, 12 studies were included in the final review. A total of 1447 patients were included, with a minimum follow-up period of 12 months. At final follow-up, both implants demonstrated significant improvements in comparison to preoperative baseline. On comparison of the inlay vs. onlay groups, the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score was higher in the inlay group (mean difference, 2.53 [95% confidence interval, 0.27-4.78]; P = .03). Postoperative motion, even if statistically greater in the onlay group (differences of 5° in forward flexion [P < .001], 3° in abduction [P = .003], and 4° in external rotation [P < .001]), was not clinically different. On comparison of complications, the inlay group showed more instances of scapular notching (93 of 322 patients vs. 70 of 415 patients; odds ratio, 0.35; P < .001) but fewer scapular spine fractures (26 of 727 patients vs. 21 of 559 patients, P = .09).

DISCUSSION

Inlay and onlay humeral tray designs in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty demonstrate similar clinical improvements postoperatively. Onlay implants have a low rate of scapular notching but a higher rate of scapular spine fracture. Understanding the strengths and weaknesses of the 2 humeral tray designs is important to provide surgeons with options to tailor surgical plans for high-risk patients.

Persistent and profound peripheral nerve injuries following reverse total shoulder arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Peripheral nerve injuries associated with reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) are rarely reported and are often dismissed as neuropraxias, particularly in the setting of perioperative nerve blocks. The purpose of this study was to evaluate nerve injuries following rTSA to determine if there is a pattern of injury and to evaluate outcomes of patients who sustain an intraoperative nerve injury.

METHODS

A retrospective review was performed identifying patients who underwent rTSA and had a concomitant major nerve injury who were referred to a multidisciplinary peripheral nerve injury clinic. Demographic data, preoperative nerve block use, physical examination, electrodiagnostic studies, injury pattern, and time from injury to referral was collected. Radiographs, Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire (QuickDASH) score, and outcomes surveys were obtained at final follow-up.

RESULTS

Twenty-two patients were identified with postoperative nerve injuries. Average time from injury to referral was 9.0 months, with 18.8 months' follow-up. Eight patients had undergone prior shoulder surgery, and 11 patients had prior shoulder trauma. Injury patterns were variable and involved diffuse pan-plexopathies with severity localized to the posterior and medial cords (11), the upper trunk (5), lateral cord (2), and axillary nerve (4). The average postoperative acromiohumeral distance (AHD) was 3.7 cm, with an average change of 2.9 cm. The average postoperative lateral humeral offset (LHO) was 1.1 cm, with an average change of 0.2 cm. Seventeen patients were confirmed to have undergone preoperative nerve blocks, which were initially attributed as the etiology of nerve injury. Eighteen patients were initially treated with observation: 11 experienced residual debilitating neuropathic pain and/or disability, and 7 had substantial improvement. One patient underwent nerve transfers, whereas the others underwent procedures for hand dysfunction improvement. The average QuickDASH score was 53.5 at average of 4 years post rTSA.

CONCLUSIONS

Although uncommon, permanent peripheral nerve injuries following rTSA do occur with debilitating effects. Preoperative regional blocks were used in most cases, but none of the blocks could be directly attributed to the nerve injuries. Nerve injuries were likely secondary to traction at the time of arthroplasty and/or substantial distalization and lateralization of the implants. Patients with medial cord injuries had the most debilitating loss of hand function. Surgeons should be cognizant of these injuries and make a timely referral to a peripheral nerve specialist.

Initiation Timing of Continuous Interscalene Brachial Plexus Blocks in Patients Undergoing Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Retrospective Before-and-After Study

A continuous interscalene brachial plexus block (CIBPB) is usually administered before surgery in awake patients. However, the use of CIBPB before surgery could hinder the identification of nerve injuries after total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA). This study aimed to compare the analgesic effects of preoperatively and postoperatively initiated CIBPBs in patients undergoing TSA. The medical records of patients who underwent TSA between January 2016 and August 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. The following analgesic phases were used: intravenous (IV) patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) phase (IV PCA group, n = 40), preoperative block phase (PreBlock group, n = 44), and postoperative block phase (PostBlock group, n = 33). The postoperative initiation of CIBPB after a neurologic exam provided better analgesia than IV PCA and had no differences with the preoperative initiation of CIBPB, except for the worst pain at the postanesthetic care unit. Opioid consumption was significantly greater in the IV PCA group, but there were no differences between the PreBlock and PostBlock groups on operation day after the transfer to the general ward. The initiation of CIBPB after a patient’s emergence from general anesthesia had comparable analgesic efficacy with preoperative CIBPB but offered the chance of a postoperative neurologic exam.

Elongation of the brachial plexus after reverse shoulder arthroplasty: an anatomical study

INTRODUCTION

The use of reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) is becoming more extended and its clinical results are good or excellent according to the literature. The main biomechanical characteristic of RSA is that it lowers and medializes the centre of rotation of the shoulder causing an arm lengthening. Although the number of neurological complications is low (5%), there are more neurophysiological changes in the brachial plexus with RSA than with the anatomic shoulder arthroplasty. The main goal of this study was to quantify the lengthening of the terminal branches of the brachial plexus suffered after RSA implantation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

20 Embalmed cadavers were analysed. Four distances using bone references were employed to measure the lengthening of the arm and subacromial space. The brachial plexus and its terminal branches (radial, axillary, ulnar, musculocutaneous and median nerves) and the axillary artery, were identified and marked. Measurements were made to determine the change of position of the neurovascular structures, the arm lengthening and the lengthening of each nerve before and after the implantation of RSA. Two models of RSA were used: SMR^®(Lima) and Delta Xtend^®(DePuy-Synthes).

RESULTS

The mean arm elongation was 10.5 mm. The subacromial space suffers an elongation of 20.5-29.8%. All the neurovascular structures suffered elongation: median nerve 23.1%, musculocutaneous nerve 22.1%, ulnar nerve 19%, radial nerve 17%, axillary nerve 12-14.5%, axillary artery 24.8%. There were no differences in the results between the types of prosthesis.

CONCLUSIONS

Due to its design, the RSA causes an arm lengthening which is reflected by the elongation of the neurovascular structures of the arm.

Incidence, Risk Factors, Prevention, and Management of Peripheral Nerve Injuries Following Shoulder Arthroplasty

In this article, the authors review the incidence and causes of iatrogenic peripheral nerve injuries following shoulder arthroplasty and provide preventative measures to decrease nerve injury rate and management options. They describe common direct and indirect causes of injury such as laceration and retractor use versus arm positioning and lengthening, respectively. Preventative measures include an understanding of anatomy and high-risk locations in the shoulder, minimizing extreme ranges of arm motion and utilization of intraoperative nerve monitoring. Lastly, the authors review diagnosis and management of neurologic symptoms including how and when to use electrodiagnostic studies, nerve grafts, transfers, or muscle/tendon transfers.

Risk Factors, Management, and Prognosis of Brachial Plexopathy Following Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty

Brachial plexus injuries can have a significant impact on patient outcomes following RTSA by slowing the overall recovery and return of function. Risk factors for brachial plexopathy include traction injury related to arm positioning and exposure during the procedure, direct nerve injury from surgical dissection, and compression injury from retractor placement. Risk of nerve injury can be minimized by limiting the time spent with the arm extended and externally rotated and avoiding excessive traction on the arm during humeral preparation and implant insertion. Prompt identification of postoperative brachial plexopathy is important to optimize the recovery of function.

Medialized vs. lateralized humeral implant in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: the comparison of outcomes in pseudoparalysis with massive rotator cuff tear

BACKGROUND

With the increasing use of lateralized humeral implants in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA), it is still unclear whether this design will be as advantageous as the medialized humeral implants in the setting of pseudoparalysis (PP).

METHODS

A total of 51 eligible RTSA cases for PP signs due to massive rotator cuff deficiency were selected for the retrospective review. Twenty-five patients were allocated to group L in which the isolated humeral side lateralization was performed (neck-shaft angle of 145°), and 26 patients were allocated to group M (neck-shaft angle of 155°). Pre- and postoperative radiologic measurements including critical shoulder angle, acromiohumeral distance (AHD), lateral humeral offset (LHO), and deltoid wrapping offset (DWO), as well as range of motion (ROM) and clinical outcome scores, were compared. The mean age was 71.0 ± 6.5 years for group L and 70.3 ± 7.0 years for group M, and the overall mean follow-up period was 49.0 ± 13.5 months (range, 25.7-68.9).

RESULTS

The preoperative radiologic measurements were similar, but the postoperative LHO and DWO were significantly larger for group L, whereas the postoperative AHD was larger for group M compared with group L, with the values being 39.8 ± 9.7 mm and 33.6 ± 10.4 mm, respectively (P = .034). For the ROM, active forward elevation did improve significantly for both, starting preoperatively with the active ranges of 39° ± 19° (passively 153° ± 24°) for group L and 42° ± 18° (passively 156° ± 11°) for group M-the final postoperative active ranges being 142° ± 16° and 133° ± 33°, respectively, without significant difference between the groups (P = .426). The postoperative recovery of PP for group L was 100% (25 of 25), whereas for group M, it was 96.2% (25 of 26). The final visual analog scale (VAS) scores and University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) shoulder scores improved significantly for both groups, but the differences between the groups at the final assessments were insignificant. The 4 complications were periprosthetic fracture, acromial stress fracture, periprosthetic joint infection, and neuropraxia, all of which were in group M, and scapular notching with higher grades were more prevalent for group M (26.9%, 7 of 26).

CONCLUSIONS

With RTSA, good outcomes and recovery were achieved in most cases of PP. The postoperative active elevation range and functional outcomes were not affected by medialization or lateralization of the humeral implant. Earlier recovery of motion was observed with the lateralized group, but no significant differences were seen in the final ROM between the groups.

Maximizing Muscle Function in Cuff-Deficient Shoulders: A Rehabilitation Proposal for Reverse Arthroplasty

Purpose

The purpose of this review is to describe the role of altered joint biomechanics in reverse shoulder arthroplasty and to propose a rehabilitation protocol for a cuff-deficient glenohumeral joint based on the current evidence.Methods and Materials: The proposed rehabilitation incorporates the principles of pertinent muscle loading while considering risk factors and surgical complications.

Results

In light of altered function of shoulder muscles in reverse arthroplasty, scapular plane abduction should be more often utilized as it better activates deltoid, teres minor, upper trapezius, and serratus anterior. Given the absence of supraspinatus and infraspinatus and reduction of external rotation moment arm of the deltoid in reverse arthroplasty, significant recovery of external rotation may not occur, although an intact teres minor may assist external rotation in the elevated position.

Conclusion

Improving the efficiency of deltoid function before and after reverse shoulder arthroplasty is a key factor in the rehabilitation of the cuff deficient shoulders. Performing exercises in scapular plane and higher abduction angles activates deltoid and other important muscles more efficiently and optimizes surgical outcomes.

Lateralization in Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty

Indications for Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty (RSA) have been extended over the last 25 years, and RSA has become the most frequently implanted shoulder arthroplasty worldwide. The initial Grammont design with medialization of the joint center of rotation (JCOR), placement of the JCOR at the bone–implant interface, distalization and semi-constrained configuration has been associated with drawbacks such as reduced rotation and range of motion (ROM), notching, instability and loss of shoulder contour. This review summarizes new strategies to overcome these drawbacks and analyzes the use of glenoid-sided, humeral-sided or global bipolar lateralization, which are applied differently by surgeons and current implant manufacturers. Advantages and drawbacks are discussed. There is evidence that lateralization addresses the initial drawbacks of the Grammont design, improving stability, rates of notching, ROM and shoulder contour, but the ideal extent of lateralization of the glenoid and humerus remains unclear, as well as the maximal acceptable joint reaction force after reduction. Overstuffing and spine of scapula fractures are potential risks. CT-based 3D planning as well as artificial intelligence will help surgeons with planning and execution of appropriate lateralization in RSA. Long-term follow-up of lateralization with new implant designs and implantation strategies is needed.

Radiological changes, infections and neurological complications after reverse shoulder arthroplasty related to different design types and their rates: Part II

Early reported complication rates with the Grammont-type reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) were very high, up to 24%.A 'problem' is defined as an intraoperative or postoperative event that is not likely to affect the patient's final outcome, such as intraoperative cement extravasation and radiographic changes. A 'complication' is defined as an intraoperative or postoperative event that is likely to affect the patient's final outcome, including infection, neurologic injury and intrathoracic central glenoid screw placement.Radiographic changes around the glenoid or humeral components of the RSA are very frequently observed and described in the literature.High complication rates related to the Grammont RSA design led to development of non-Grammont designs which led to a dramatic fall in the majority of complications.The percentage of radiological changes after RSA is not negligible and remains unsolved, despite a decrease in its occurrence in the last decade. However, such changes should be now considered as simple problems because they rarely have a negative influence on the patient's final outcome, and their prevalence has dramatically decreased.With further changes in indications and designs for RSA, it is crucial to accurately track the rates and types of complications to justify its new designs and increased indications. Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2021;6:1109-1121. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.6.210040.

The effect of glenosphere lateralization and inferiorization on deltoid force in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

A medialized center of rotation (COR) in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) comes with limitations such as scapular notching and reduced range of motion. To mitigate these effects, lateralization and inferiorization of the COR are performed, but may adversely affect deltoid muscle force. The study purposes were to measure the effect of RTSA with varying glenosphere configurations on (1) the COR and (2) deltoid force compared with intact shoulders and shoulders with massive posterosuperior rotator cuff tears (PS-RCT). We hypothesized that the highest deltoid forces would occur in shoulders with PS-RCT, and that RTSA would lead to a decrease in required forces that is further minimized with lateralization and inferiorization of the COR but still higher compared with native shoulders with an intact rotator cuff.

METHODS

In this study, 8 cadaveric shoulders were dissected leaving only the rotator cuff muscles and capsule intact. A custom apparatus incorporating motion capture and a dynamic tensile testing machine to measure the changes in COR and deltoid forces while simultaneously recording glenohumeral abduction was designed. Five consecutive testing states were tested: (1) intact shoulder, (2) PS-RCT, (3) RTSA with standard glenosphere, (4) RTSA with 4 mm lateralized glenosphere, and (5) RTSA with 2.5 mm inferiorized glenosphere. Statistical Parametric Mapping was used to analyze the deltoid force as a function of the abduction angle. One-way repeated-measures within-specimens analysis of variance was conducted, followed by post hoc t-tests for pairwise comparisons between the states.

RESULTS

All RTSA configurations shifted the COR medially and inferiorly with respect to native (standard: 4.2 ± 2.1 mm, 19.7 ± 3.6 mm; 4 mm lateralized: 3.9 ± 1.2 mm, 16.0 ± 1.8; 2.5 mm inferiorized: 6.9 ± 0.9 mm, 18.9 ± 1.7 mm). Analysis of variance showed a significant effect of specimen state on deltoid force across all abduction angles. Of the 10 paired t-test comparisons made between states, only 3 showed significant differences: (1) intact shoulders necessitated significantly lower deltoid force than specimens with PS-RCT below 42° abduction, (2) RTSAs with standard glenospheres required significantly lower deltoid force than RTSA with 4 mm lateralized glenospheres above 34° abduction, and (3) RTSAs with 2.5 mm inferiorized glenospheres had significantly lower deltoid force than RTSA with 4 mm of glenosphere lateralization at higher abduction angles.

CONCLUSIONS

RTSA with a 2.5 mm inferiorized glenosphere and no additional lateralization resulted in less deltoid force to abduct the arm compared with 4 mm lateralized glenospheres. Therefore, when aiming to mitigate downsides of a medialized COR, an inferiorized glenosphere may be preferable in terms of its effect on deltoid force.

Anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty for primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis is associated with excellent outcomes and low revision rates in the elderly

BACKGROUND

The relative indications of anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) and reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) continue to evolve. Some surgeons favor RSA over TSA for elderly patients with primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis (GHOA) and an intact rotator cuff due to fear of a postoperative (secondary) rotator cuff tear in this age group. However, RSA is associated with unique complications and a worse functional arc of motion compared with TSA. Therefore, it is important to understand the clinical outcomes and rates of revision surgery and secondary rotator cuff tears in elderly patients undergoing TSA.

METHODS

Between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2017, 377 consecutive TSAs were performed for primary GHOA in 340 patients 70 years of age or older. The mean age at surgery was 76.2 years (standard deviation [SD], 4.9). Clinical evaluation included pain, motion, and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score. Radiographs were reviewed for preoperative morphology and postoperative complications. All complications and reoperations were recorded. The average clinical follow-up time was 3.3 years (SD, 2.0). Statistical analyses were performed, and Kaplan-Meier implant survival estimates were calculated. For all analyses, a P value <.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

The mean pain visual analog scale and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score at the final follow-up were 1.6 (SD, 2.2) and 78.0 (SD, 17.8), respectively. Forward elevation and external rotation increased from 96° (SD, 30°) and 26° (SD, 20°) preoperatively to 160° (SD, 32°) and 64° (SD, 26°) postoperatively (P < .001 for each). The percentage of patients who had internal rotation to L5 or greater increased from 24.8% preoperatively to 71.8% postoperatively (P < .001). Revision surgery was performed in 3 shoulders (0.8%), and the 5-year implant survival estimate was 98.9% (95% confidence interval: 97.3%-100%). There were 3 medical (0.8%), 10 minor surgical (2.7%), and 5 major surgical (1.3%) complications. No shoulder had radiographic evidence of humeral component loosening, whereas 7 (2%) had evidence of some degree of glenoid component loosening. In total, there were 5 secondary rotator cuff tears (1.3%), of which 2 (0.5%) required revision surgery.

CONCLUSION

Elderly patients with primary GHOA and an intact rotator cuff have excellent clinical and radiographic outcomes after anatomic TSA, with high implant survival rates and a low incidence of secondary rotator cuff tears in the first 5 postoperative years. Age greater than 70 by itself should not be considered an indication for RSA over TSA.

Incidence of peripheral nerve injury in revision total shoulder arthroplasty: an intraoperative nerve monitoring study

BACKGROUND

The incidence of nerve injuries in revision total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) is not well defined in the literature and may be higher than that in primary procedures, with 1 study reporting a complication rate of 50% for shoulder revisions. Given that continuous intraoperative nerve monitoring (IONM) can be an effective tool in diagnosing evolving neurologic dysfunction and preventing postoperative injuries, the purpose of this study was to report on IONM data and nerve injury rates in a series of revision TSAs.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort review of consecutive patients who underwent revision TSA was performed from January 2016 to March 2020. Indications for revision included infection (n = 7); failed total arthroplasty and hemiarthroplasty secondary to pain, dysfunction, and/or loose components (n = 36); and periprosthetic fracture (n = 1). Of the shoulders, 32 underwent revision to a reverse TSA, 6 underwent revision to an anatomic TSA, and 6 underwent spacer placement. IONM data included transcranial electrical motor evoked potentials (MEPs), somatosensory evoked potentials, and free-run electromyography. The motor alert threshold was set at ≥80% signal attenuation in any peripheral nerve. Patients were screened for neurologic deficits immediately following surgery, prior to administration of an interscalene nerve block, and during the first 2 postoperative visits. Additional data collection included surgical indication, sex, laterality, age at surgery, procedure performed, body mass index, history of tobacco use, Charlson Comorbidity Index, medical history, and preoperative range of motion.

RESULTS

A total of 44 shoulders in 38 patients were included, with a mean age of 63.2 years (standard deviation, 13.0 years). Of the procedures, 22.4% (n = 10) had an MEP alert, with 8 isolated to a single nerve (7 axillary and 1 radial) and 1 isolated to the axillary and musculocutaneous nerves. Only 1 patient experienced a major brachial plexus alert involving axillary, musculocutaneous, radial, ulnar, and median nerve MEP alerts, as well as ulnar and median nerve somatosensory evoked potential alerts. Age, sex, body mass index, Charlson Comorbidity Index, and preoperative range of motion were not found to be significantly different between cases in which an MEP alert occurred and cases with no MEP alerts. In the postoperative period, no minor or major nerve injuries were found whereas distal peripheral neuropathy developed in 4 patients (9.1%).

CONCLUSION

Among 44 surgical procedures, no patients (0%) had a major or minor nerve injury postoperatively and 4 patients (9.1%) complained of distal peripheral neuropathy postoperatively. In this study, we have shown that through the use of IONM, the rate of minor and major nerve injuries can be minimized in revision shoulder arthroplasty.

Early clinical and radiographic outcomes of an augmented baseplate in reverse shoulder arthroplasty for glenohumeral arthritis with glenoid deformity

BACKGROUND

Glenoid deformity is commonly encountered in patients undergoing reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA). Augmented baseplates can correct glenoid deformity while potentially avoiding certain complications encountered with structural bone graft. Limited evidence exists to support the use of metallic augmented baseplates in RSA.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review to identify all patients treated with an augmented baseplate during primary RSA with a minimum of 1 year of clinical and radiographic follow-up. Preoperative radiographs and advanced imaging were used to determine glenoid morphology and deformity. Postoperative radiographs were used to evaluate for deformity correction, radiographic complications, and early baseplate loosening or failure. Prospectively collected clinical data and patient-reported outcome scores were determined.

RESULTS

Primary RSA was performed with an augmented baseplate in 44 patients (mean age, 72 ± 6 years; 15 half-wedge and 29 full-wedge augmentations). Glenoid retroversion was significantly improved for the entire cohort (P = .001). Among the 22 patients with either Walch type B2, B3, or C glenoid morphology, glenoid version improved from 28° ± 8° to 16° ± 8° (P = .001). Glenoid inclination, as determined by the β angle, was significantly improved for the entire cohort (P < .001). Among the 18 patients with Favard type E2 or E3 glenoid morphology, glenoid inclination improved from 67° ± 7° to 81° ± 8° (P < .001). Postoperative range of motion and functional outcome scores including the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, Simple Shoulder Test score, Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation score, and visual analog scale score for pain significantly improved within the entire cohort (P < .05). No patients had evidence of baseplate loosening or failure of the glenoid component. Acromial stress fractures developed in 5 patients (11.4%), and 2 patients (4.5%) underwent a reoperation unrelated to the glenoid component.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

Primary RSA with an augmented baseplate results in excellent short-term clinical outcomes and significant deformity correction in patients with advanced glenoid deformity. There were no complications related to the augmented baseplate or glenoid component. The rate of acromial stress fractures appears higher than typically reported and warrants further investigation.

Neurologic complications in primary anatomic and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: A review

Neurologic injury during shoulder replacement is one of the less common complications of the procedure, however the clinical implications can be significant. The purpose of this paper is to review the current literature on neurologic complications in various types of shoulder replacement and provide recommendations regarding avoidance, evaluation, and management of these complications.

Prevention and Treatment of Nerve Injuries in Shoulder Arthroplasty

➤

Nerve injuries during shoulder arthroplasty have traditionally been considered rare events, but recent electrodiagnostic studies have shown that intraoperative nerve trauma is relatively common.

➤

The brachial plexus and axillary and suprascapular nerves are the most commonly injured neurologic structures, with the radial and musculocutaneous nerves being less common sites of injury.

➤

Specific measures taken during the surgical approach, component implantation, and revision surgery may help to prevent direct nerve injury. Intraoperative positioning maneuvers and arm lengthening warrant consideration to minimize indirect injuries.

➤

Suspected nerve injuries should be investigated with electromyography preferably at 6 weeks and no later than 3 months postoperatively, allowing for primary reconstruction within 3 to 6 months of injury when indicated. Primary reconstructive options include neurolysis, direct nerve repair, nerve grafting, and nerve transfers.

➤

Secondary reconstruction is preferred for injuries presenting >12 months after surgery. Secondary reconstructive options with favorable outcomes include tendon transfers and free functioning muscle transfers.

Factors Influencing Appropriate Implant Selection and Position in Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty

Reverse shoulder arthroplasty has increased in popularity and has provided improved but somewhat variable results. These variable outcomes may be related to many factors, including implant design, component positioning, specific indication, and patient anatomy. The original Grammont design provided a solution to the high failure rate at the time but was found to have a high rate of scapular notching and poor restoration of rotation. Modern lateralized designs are more consistent in reducing scapular notching while improving range of motion, especially in regards to external rotation. This review article summarizes the effects of modern reverse shoulder prostheses on outcomes.

Identifying the axillary nerve during shoulder surgery: an anatomic study using advanced imaging

Background

The axillary nerve (AXN) is one of the more commonly injured nerves during shoulder surgery. Prior anatomic studies of the AXN in adults were performed using cadaveric specimens with small sample sizes. Our research observes a larger cohort of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies in order to gain a more representative sample of the course of the AXN and aid surgeons intraoperatively.

Methods

High-resolution 3T MRI studies performed at our institution from January 2010 to June 2019 were reviewed. Four blinded reviewers with musculoskeletal radiology or orthopedic surgery training measured the distance of the AXN to the surgical neck of the humerus (SNH), the lateral tip of the acromion (LTA), and the inferior glenoid rim (IGR). Intraclass correlation coefficient was calculated to assess reliability between reviewers. The nerve location was assessed relative to rotator cuff tear status.

Results

A total of 257 shoulder MRIs were included. Intraclass correlation coefficient was excellent at 0.80 for the SNH, 0.90 for the LTA, and 0.94 for the IGR. All intraobserver reliabilities were above 0.80. The mean distance from the AXN to SNH was 1.7 cm (range, 0.7-3.1 cm; interquartile range, 1.38-2.00) and that from the AXN to IGR was 1.6 cm (range, 0.6-2.6 cm; interquartile range, 1.33-1.88). The mean AXN to LTA distance was 7.1 cm, with a range of 5.2-9.0 cm across patient heights; there was a large effect size related to the LTA to AXN distance and patient height with a correlation of r = 0.603 (P < .001). Rotator cuff pathology appears to affect nerve location by increasing the distance between the AXN and SNH (P = .027).

Discussion/Conclusion

The AXN is vulnerable to injury during both open and arthroscopic shoulder procedures. This injury can be either a result of direct trauma to the nerve or secondary to traction placed on the nerve with reconstructive procedures that distalize the humerus. Our study demonstrates that the AXN can be found as little as 5.6 mm from the IGR and 6.9 mm from the SNH. In addition, we illustrate the relationship between patient height and the LTA to AXN distance and complete rotator cuff tears and the SNH to AXN distance. Our study is the first to demonstrate the nerve's proximity to important surgical landmarks of the shoulder using a large sample size of high-resolution images in living human shoulders.