Comparing expert opinion within the care team regarding postoperative rehabilitation protocol following rotator cuff repair

Sling Is Not Inferior to Brace Immobilization After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair: A Randomized Controlled Trial

PURPOSE

To compare the safety and efficacy of immobilizing the upper limb with a brace versus a less-constrained sling in the rehabilitation after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR), by documenting clinical and radiologic results.

METHODS

ARCR was performed in 110 patients (54.9 ± 8.3 years) randomized in group A, using a brace for 6 weeks after surgery (3 weeks day and night then 3 weeks only at night), and group B, using a simple sling for 2 weeks only. Patients were evaluated at baseline, 6 weeks, and 3 and 6 months. Functional outcomes were range of motion, strength, Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score, and Constant-Murley Score (CMS). Pain was assessed with a visual analog scale and quality of life with the SF-36 questionnaire. The primary outcome was the CMS at 6 months. At 6 months, 3-Tesla magnetic resonance imaging was performed to document the status of the rotator cuff repair. The minimal clinically important difference was also analyzed.

RESULTS

Both groups A and B showed a worsening at 6 weeks and an improvement at 3 and 6 months of Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand and CMS, as well as a significant visual analog scale decrease at every follow-up (P < .005). SF-36 showed a different trend: General health improved at 6 weeks, then decreased at 3 months, and increased again at 6 months. No difference was retrieved between the 2 groups at any follow-up in terms of pain, functional, and general health scores. The minimal clinically important difference for the primary outcome was 14.5 points and was reached in 56.5% and 61.2% of patients in the sling and brace group, respectively. The evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging scans identified 5 patients in each group with a supraspinatus tendon re-rupture, with no statistical difference in the re-rupture rate between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSIONS

This randomized controlled trial demonstrated that ARCR postoperative sling immobilization was not inferior to immobilization with a brace, having no differences in terms of functional scores, pain levels, general health, and risk of tendon re-rupture.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level I, high-quality randomized controlled trial (designed as a therapeutic study investigating the results of treatment) with statistically significant difference.

Association between timing of initiating supervised physical rehabilitation after rotator cuff repair and incidence of repeat repair and capsulitis: a population-based analysis

BACKGROUND

There is limited consensus on the optimal time to initiate supervised physical rehabilitation after a rotator cuff repair (RCR). We examined whether timing of initiating supervised physical rehabilitation was associated with repeat RCR or development of adhesive capsulitis within 12 months postoperatively in an observational cohort of commercially insured adults.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study used the IBM MarketScan Commercial Claims and Encounters Database. We included adults aged 18-64 who underwent a unilateral outpatient RCR between 2017 and 2020 and initiated supervised physical rehabilitation 1-90 days postoperatively. Multivariable logistic regression models examined the adjusted association between time of initiating supervised physical rehabilitation (1-13, 14-27, 28-41, and 42-90 days postoperatively) and each of the primary outcomes: repeat RCR and capsulitis. In a sensitivity analysis, time to rehabilitation was alternatively categorized using a data-driven approach of quartiles (1-7, 8-16, 17-30, and 31-90 days postoperatively). We report adjusted odds ratios (OR).

RESULTS

Among 33,841 patients (86.7% arthroscopic index RCR), the median time between index RCR and rehabilitation initiation was 16 days (interquartile range 7-30), with 39.9% initiating rehabilitation at 1-13 days. Additionally, 2.2% underwent repeat RCR within 12 months, and 12-month capsulitis was identified in 1.9% of patients. There were no significant associations between timing of initiating rehabilitation and 12-month repeat RCR (OR 0.85-0.93, P = .18-.49) or 12-month capsulitis (OR 0.83-0.94, P = .22-.63). Lack of associations between timing and outcomes was supported in sensitivity analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

Timing of initiating rehabilitation was not significantly associated with adverse outcomes after RCR. The finding of no increased odds of repeat RCR or capsulitis with the earliest timing may support earlier initiation of rehabilitation to accelerate return to daily activities. Findings should be replicated in another dataset of similarly-aged patients.

Provider opinions on effectiveness of physical therapy as treatment for glenohumeral arthritis

BACKGROUND

Physical therapy (PT) is a described first-line treatment option for glenohumeral arthritis, but its efficacy for treating this spectrum of disease is not well understood. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the opinions of expert providers-orthopedic surgeons and physical therapists-regarding the utility of PT in treating glenohumeral arthritis in different stages of radiographic severity. Our goal is to identify areas of interprofessional majority agreement as well as areas without agreement that warrant further investigation.

METHODS

A 35-question survey was created and distributed via email to members of the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons and the American Society of Shoulder and Elbow Therapists, collecting information on demographics, professional experience, and the perceived benefit of PT for patients with different stages of glenohumeral arthritis based on radiographic severity. Survey responses were analyzed for inter-professional differences in distribution of answer choices as well as for majority agreement statements. Items with >50% agreement from a professional group were considered statements of majority agreement.

RESULTS

One hundred and ninety surgeons and 39 physical therapists completed the survey. Surgeons and therapists demonstrated different distribution of answer choices in 25 of the 29 nondemographic related questions (86%). Surgeons and therapists reached the same majority statement in 8 items (28%) and reached disagreeing majority statements in 4 items (14%). They agreed on the benefits of PT for mild arthritis, the benefits of corticosteroid injections, the frequency of strengthening exercises, and that PT failure should not be required for surgical approval in patients with severe arthritis. They disagreed on the whether PT exacerbates symptoms in patients with moderate arthritis, and whether preoperative PT influences postoperative outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Both surgeons and therapists agreed that PT may be less beneficial for patients with more advanced radiographic arthritis and that PT failure should not be required for insurance approval for surgical intervention in patients with severe glenohumeral arthritis. Further research is needed to determine the efficacy of PT for patients with moderate arthritis as well as the utility of preoperative PT for improving postoperative outcomes.

Current Evidence Based Recommendations on Rehabilitation following Arthroscopic Shoulder Surgery: Rotator Cuff, Instability, Superior Labral Pathology, and Adhesive Capsulitis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Arthroscopy has become increasingly popular for a addressing a wide variety of shoulder pathology. However, despite increasing interest, there is still much uncertainty and variability amongst providers regarding optimal post-operative rehabilitation. This review provides an overview of the evidence underlying common rehab protocols used following arthroscopic interventions for rotator cuff disease, shoulder instability, superior labral anterior to posterior (SLAP) tears and adhesive capsulitis.

RECENT FINDINGS

For small and medium sized rotator cuff tears, early motion protocols do not seem to affect healing or retear rates, however there is no difference with regards to long term functional outcomes when compared to standard motion protocols. For larger tears (> 3 cm), early active motion may be associated with impaired tendon integrity. Early range of motion following arthroscopic Bankart repair has not been shown to increase rate of recurrence, however the data on return to sport requires more granularity to effectively guide care. Further research needs to be done to compare rehab protocols following SLAP repair and arthroscopic capsular release. Rehabilitation protocols following rotator cuff surgery and anterior shoulder stabilization have garnered the most research interest. However, there is still a need for larger higher-level studies examining the long-term effects of different rehab protocols. Regarding the arthroscopic management of other types of shoulder instability, SLAP tears and adhesive capsulitis, there is paucity of high-quality evidence. This knowledge gap likely underpins the variability in different rehab protocols seen in clinical practice, highlighting the need for more research.

The Reverse Fragility Index: Interpreting the Evidence for Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair Healing Associated With Early Versus Delayed Mobilization

Background: The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) note "strong" evidence that early and delayed mobilization protocols after small to medium arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs achieve similar rotator cuff healing rates. Purpose: We utilized the reverse fragility index (RFI) to assess the fragility of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) reporting no statistically significant difference in tendon re-tear rates after rotator cuff repair in those undergoing early versus delayed rehabilitation. Methods: Randomized controlled trials used in the most recent AAOS CPGs on the timing of postoperative mobilization after arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs were analyzed. Only RCTs with a reported P value ≥ .05 were included. The RFI at a threshold of P < .05 was calculated for each study. The reverse fragility quotient (RFQ) was calculated by dividing the RFI by the study sample size. Results: In 6 clinical trials with a total of 542 patients, the number of tendon re-tear events was 48. The median RFI at the P < .05 threshold was 4 (range: 3.25-4.75), and the median RFQ was .05 (range: 0.03-0.08). The median loss to follow-up was 6 patients. Of the 6 studies investigated, 3 reported a loss to follow-up greater than their respective RFI. Conclusion: The equivalence in rotator cuff repair healing rates associated with early and delayed mobilization protocols rests on fragile studies, as their statistical non-significance can be reversed by changing the outcome status of only a handful of patients. Consideration should be given to the routine reporting of RFI in clinical practice guidelines including RCTs with statistically non-significant results.

Variation in Utilization of Physical Therapist and Occupational Therapist Services After Rotator Cuff Repair: A Population-Based Study

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to describe the utilization of physical therapist and occupational therapist services after rotator cuff repair (RCR) and examine variation in rehabilitation characteristics by profession.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study used the IBM MarketScan Commercial Claims and Encounters database. Eligible patients were 18 to 64 years old and had undergone outpatient RCR between 2017 and 2020. Physical therapist and occupational therapist services were identified using evaluation and treatment codes with profession-specific modifiers ("GP" or "GO"). Factors predicting utilization of formal rehabilitation and physical therapist versus occupational therapist services were examined; and univariable and multivariable analyses of days to initiate therapy, number of visits, and episode length by profession were completed.

RESULTS

Among 53,497 patients with an RCR, 81.2% initiated formal rehabilitation (93.8% physical therapist, 5.2% occupational therapist, 1.0% both services). Patients in the Northeast and West (vs the South) were less likely to receive rehabilitation (odds ratio [OR] = 0.67 to 0.70) and less likely to receive occupational therapist services (OR = 0.39). Patients living in the Midwest (versus the South) were less likely to receive rehabilitation (OR = 0.79) but more likely to receive occupational therapist services (OR = 1.51). Similarly, those living in a rural (versus urban) area were less likely to utilize rehabilitation (OR = 0.89) but more likely to receive occupational therapist services (OR = 2.21). Additionally, receiving occupational therapist instead of physical therapist services was associated with decreased therapist visits (-16.89%), days to initiate therapy (-13.43%), and episode length (-13.78%).

CONCLUSION

Most patients in our commercially insured cohort utilized rehabilitation services, with a small percentage receiving occupational therapist services. We identified profession-specific variation in utilization characteristics that warrants further examination to understand predictors and associated outcomes.

IMPACT

Variation in rehabilitation utilization after RCR, including profession-specific and regional differences, may indicate opportunities to improve standardization and quality of care.

The Rehabilitation Journey of a Cricket Player With Partial Rotator Cuff Tear: A Case Report of Pre and Postoperative Physiotherapy

In adults, partial rotator cuff injuries can frequently be the root cause of pain in the shoulder. One recurrent pathology that may significantly impact a broad spectrum of individuals, including athletes, laborers, and sedentary people, is partial rotator cuff tears (RCTs). Physical therapy, anti-inflammatories, painkillers, rest or activity modifications, and corticosteroid injections are a few nonoperative treatment options for partial RCTs. We report a case of a 27-year-old male who sustained a rotator cuff injury of the right shoulder. The patient presented with pain and restriction of the right shoulder joint following the injury, which had occurred while throwing a ball forcefully with his right hand. The rehabilitation program emphasized pain management, restoring range of motion (ROM), increasing strength of muscles, and functional activities to optimize the patient's recovery. Concurrently, isometrics, ROM, and strengthening exercises were integrated into the rehabilitation program to enhance muscle strength, prevent tightness, and maintain ROM. The patient's progress was monitored by using the Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) score and the Upper Extremity Functional Scale (UEFS) at specific intervals during rehabilitation. The treatment and healing of a patient with an RCT who underwent both pre and postoperative physiotherapy are explored in this case report.

Rehabilitation following rotator cuff repair: A survey exploring clinical equipoise among surgical members of the British Elbow and Shoulder Society

BACKGROUND

We investigated clinical equipoise across surgical members of the British Elbow and Shoulder Society (BESS) in relation to rehabilitation following rotator cuff repair.

METHOD

An online survey explored clinical equipoise regarding early patient-directed versus standard rehabilitation after rotator cuff repair to inform the design of a national randomised controlled trial (RCT). It described different clinical scenarios relating to patient age, tear size, location and whether other patient-related and intra-operative factors would influence equipoise.

RESULTS

76 surgeons completed the survey. 81% agreed/ strongly agreed that early mobilisation might benefit recovery; 57% were neutral/ disagreed that this approach risks re-tear. 87% agreed/ strongly agreed that there is clinical uncertainty about the effectiveness of different approaches to rehabilitation. As age of the patient and tear size increased, the proportion of respondents who would agree to recruit and accept the outcome of randomisation reduced, and this was compounded if subscapularis was torn. Other factors that influenced equipoise were diabetes and non-secure repair.

CONCLUSION

Surgical members of BESS recognise uncertainty about the effectiveness of different approaches to rehabilitation following rotator cuff repair. We identified a range of factors that influence clinical equipoise that will be considered in the design of a new RCT.

Knowledge, beliefs, and attitudes of spinal manipulation: a cross-sectional survey of Italian physiotherapists

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

High-velocity low-amplitude thrust spinal manipulation (SM) is a recommended and commonly used manual therapy intervention in physiotherapy. Beliefs surrounding the safety and effectiveness of SM have challenged its use, and even advocated for its abandonment. Our study aimed to investigate the knowledge and beliefs surrounding SM by Italian physiotherapists compared with similar practitioners in other countries.

METHODS

An online survey with 41 questions was adapted from previous surveys and was distributed via a mailing list of the Italian Physiotherapists Association (March 22-26, 2020). The questionnaire was divided into 4 sections to capture information on participant demographics, utilization, potential barriers, and knowledge about SM. Questions were differentiated between spinal regions. Attitudes towards different spinal regions, attributes associated with beliefs, and the influence of previous educational background were each evaluated.

RESULTS

Of the 7398 registered physiotherapists, 575 (7.8%) completed the survey and were included for analysis. The majority of respondents perceived SM as safe and effective when applied to the thoracic (74.1%) and lumbar (72.2%) spines; whereas, a smaller proportion viewed SM to the upper cervical spine (56.8%) as safe and effective. Respondents reported they were less likely to provide and feel comfortable with upper cervical SM (respectively, 27.5% and 48.5%) compared to the thoracic (respectively, 52.2% and 74.8%) and lumbar spines (respectively, 46.3% and 74.3%). Most physiotherapists (70.4%) agreed they would perform additional screening prior to upper cervical SM compared to other spinal regions. Respondents who were aware of clinical prediction rules were more likely to report being comfortable with SM (OR 2.38-3.69) and to perceive it as safe (OR 1.75-3.12). Finally, physiotherapists without musculoskeletal specialization, especially those with a traditional manual therapy background, were more likely to perform additional screening prior to SM, use SM less frequently, report being less comfortable performing SM, and report upper cervical SM as less safe (p < 0.001).

DISCUSSION

The beliefs and attitudes of physiotherapists surrounding the use of SM are significantly different when comparing the upper cervical spine to other spinal regions. An educational background in traditional manual therapy significantly influences beliefs and attitudes. We propose an updated framework on evidence-based SM.

Managing shoulder pain: a meta-ethnography exploring healthcare providers' experiences

OBJECTIVE

To review and synthesize qualitative research studies exploring the experiences of Healthcare Providers (HCPs) of managing shoulder pain.

METHODS

A meta-ethnographic approach was adopted to review and synthesize eligible studies. The findings from each included study were translated into one another using Noblit and Hares' seven-stage process. A systematic search of eleven electronic databases was conducted in February 2021. Methodological quality was assessed using the CASP Appraisal Tool.

RESULTS

Ten studies were included in the meta-synthesis, all deemed of high methodological quality. Three themes were identified; (1) Lack of consensus: "we all have different approaches." (2) Challenges to Changing Practice: It's "really hard to change and switch to a different approach," (3) Getting "Buy in" to Treatment: "…so you have to really sell it early".

CONCLUSION

Healthcare providers working with people with shoulder pain struggle to reconcile, often conflicting, research recommendations with their own clinical experience, beliefs and patient expectations. These findings help explain the continued lack of consensus on how best to manage shoulder pain in clinical practice.IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONHealthcare providers (HCPs) working with people with shoulder pain struggle to resolve conflicts between evidence-based recommendations, clinical experience, their own shoulder pain beliefs and patient expectations and preferences.Stronger collaboration across professional disciplines is needed to address the current lack of consensus on the management of shoulder pain.Many HCP's find it difficult to engage patients with shoulder pain in exercise and they work hard to "sell" this approach to patients using strategies such as education, shared decision making and therapeutic alliance.

'Down to the person, the individual patient themselves': A qualitative study of treatment decision-making for shoulder pain

Introduction

Many inconsistencies have been identified in the translation of evidence‐based treatment recommendations for musculoskeletal shoulder pain into healthcare services, with little known about factors influencing decision‐making. The objective of this study was to explore the views and experiences of healthcare providers (HCPs) and people living with shoulder pain on treatment decision‐making.

Methods

Adopting a qualitative design, purposeful sampling was employed to recruit 13 individuals with nonspecific musculoskeletal shoulder pain and 30 HCPs. Data were collected through 1:1 semi‐structured interviews and analysed using an approach informed by Constructivist Grounded Theory. To facilitate analysis, two patient and public involvement (PPI) meetings were conducted.

Results

Most participants (69%) had shoulder pain of ≥1‐year duration. Biomechanical beliefs about shoulder pain predominated and were heavily influential in decision‐making for both patients and HCPs. Despite a consensus that therapeutic alliance facilitated decision‐making, the extent of collaboration between HCPs and patients in treatment decision‐making was rather limited. In addition to condition‐specific factors, Individual patient characteristics and resources also influenced treatment decisions.

Conclusion

Findings revealed the complexity of the decision‐making process for both patients and HCPs, exposing substantial gaps between the reported views and experiences of participants and the principles of client‐centred and evidence‐based practice. There is a pressing need to enhance the translation of evidence‐based knowledge into practice in this clinical area.

Patient or Public Contribution

In line with a consultative approach to collaborative data analysis, a subgroup of participants attended two PPI meetings to provide commentary and feedback on preliminary findings.

Assessing Cranial Nerves in Physical Therapy Practice: Findings from a Cross-Sectional Survey and Implication for Clinical Practice

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Serious pathologies of the neck can potentially result in cranial nerve palsy. Knowledge about cranial nerve examination (CNE) seems sparse, and its use is still unknown. We aim to investigate the knowledge, skills, and utilization of CNE of Italian physiotherapists.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

An online cross-sectional survey.

RESULTS

396 completed the survey, reaching the required sample size. Although Italian physiotherapists consider CNE relevant (mean ± SD = 7.6/10 ± 2.0), over half of all responders (n = 229 (57.8%)) were not trained in the fundamentals and around a third did not use it in their daily practice (n = 138 (34.8%)). Additionally, participants were unconfident and insecure in conducting (n = 152 (38.4%) and n = 147 (37.1%)), interpreting (n = 140 (35.4%) and n = 164 (41.4%)), and managing the CNE (n = 141 (35.6%) and n = 154 (38.9%)). Possessing a musculoskeletal specialization was associated with an increased value attributed to clinical practice guidelines and reduced the lack of confidence in conducting, interpreting, and managing the CNE (respectively, n = 35 (25.5%), p = 0.0001; n = 32 (23.4%) p = 0.0002; n = 32 (23.4%) p = 0.0002). Working in a direct access setting significantly increased the considered relevance of guidelines and the concerns about arterial (p = 0.004) and other serious pathologies (p = 0.021). Pain and visual disturbances were considered the main indicators to CNE, demonstrating limited knowledge of signs and symptoms' indicating CNE. Participants considered specific training in CNE as relevant (mean ± SD = 7.6/10 = 2.1).

CONCLUSIONS

a substantial proportion of Italian physiotherapists are not schooled in the fundamentals of cranial nerve examination. Given the number of physiotherapists who work in first contact roles, this is a professional concern.

Interprofessional Inconsistencies in the Diagnosis of Shoulder Instability: Survey Results of Physicians and Rehabilitation Providers

BACKGROUND

Clinicians of many specialties within sports medicine care for athletes with shoulder instability, but successful outcomes are inconsistent. Consistency across specialties in the diagnosis of shoulder instability is critical for care of the athlete, yet the extent of divergence in its diagnosis is unknown.

HYPOTHESIS

Physicians differ from rehabilitation providers in which findings they deem clinically important to differentiate shoulder instability from impingement, and in how they diagnose athlete scenarios with atraumatic shoulder instability.

STUDY DESIGN

Cross-sectional study.

METHODS

Physicians (orthopaedic surgeons, primary care sports medicine physicians) and rehabilitation providers (physical therapists, athletic trainers) were asked via an online survey to rate clinical factors used to diagnose shoulder instability. Clinicians were also asked to diagnose two athlete scenarios with concurrent clinical findings of atraumatic shoulder instability and impingement, differentiated by the absence or presence of a positive sulcus sign.

RESULTS

Responses were recorded from 888 clinicians. Orthopaedic surgeons (N=170) and primary care sports medicine physicians (N=108) ranked physical examination factors as more important for the diagnosis of shoulder instability than patient history factors, whereas physical therapists (N=379) and athletic trainers (N=231) preferred patient history factors. Orthopaedic surgeons differed from physical therapists and athletic trainers in their clinical diagnoses for both scenarios (P≤0.001).

CONCLUSION

A lack of consistency exists among sports medicine clinicians in recognizing which clinical factors are important when used to diagnose shoulder instability and in diagnoses given with concurrent findings of impingement.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 3.

Rehabilitation following rotator cuff repair: A multi-centre pilot & feasibility randomised controlled trial (RaCeR)

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the feasibility of a multi-centre randomised controlled trial to compare the clinical and cost-effectiveness of early patient-directed rehabilitation versus standard rehabilitation following surgical repair of the rotator cuff of the shoulder.

DESIGN

Two-arm, multi-centre pilot and feasibility randomised controlled trial.

SETTING

Five National Health Service hospitals in England.

PARTICIPANTS

Adults (n = 73) with non-traumatic rotator cuff tears scheduled for repair were recruited and randomly allocated remotely prior to surgery.

INTERVENTIONS

Early patient-directed rehabilitation (n = 37); advised to remove their sling as soon as able and move as symptoms allow. Standard rehabilitation (n = 36); sling immobilisation for four weeks.

MEASURES

(1) Randomisation of 20% or more eligible patients. (2) Difference in time out of sling of 40% or more between groups. (3) Follow-up greater than 70%.

RESULTS

73/185 (39%) potentially eligible patients were randomised. Twenty participants were withdrawn, 11 due to not receiving rotator cuff repair. The between-group difference in proportions of participants who exceeded the cut-off of 222.6 hours out of the sling was 50% (80% CI = 29%, 72%), with the early patient-directed rehabilitation group reporting greater time out of sling. 52/73 (71%) and 52/53 (98%) participants were followed-up at 12 weeks when withdrawals were included and excluded respectively. Eighteen full-thickness re-tears were reported (early patient-directed rehabilitation = 7, standard rehabilitation = 11). Five serious adverse events were reported.

CONCLUSION

A main randomised controlled trial is feasible but would require allocation of participants following surgery to counter the issue of withdrawal due to not receiving surgery.

Rehabilitation following rotator cuff repair: A survey of current practice (2020)

INTRODUCTION

Approaches to rehabilitation following rotator cuff repair are variable but typically include 4-6 weeks of immobilisation followed by a gradual introduction of movement and activity. However, research has questioned whether such an approach is optimal. The aim of this study was to undertake an updated survey to understand whether practice has evolved in line with contemporary research.

METHODS

An electronic survey was developed describing three case scenarios (medium-sized rotator cuff repair [2 cm], large-sized rotator cuff repair [4 cm] and large-sized rotator cuff repair with biceps tenodesis). Clinicians involved with rehabilitation following rotator cuff repair were invited to participate.

RESULTS

129 responses were received (United Kingdom = 87, other regions [ORs] = 42). Respondents would most commonly recommend four to six weeks of immobilisation for all case scenarios. Passive movement would commence during this period, with active movement recommended from four to six weeks. Resisted exercise would commence between seven to 12 weeks along with return to driving. There were some minor differences in recommendations between respondents from the United Kingdom and ORs, including a greater proportion from the United Kingdom recommending sling immobilisation rather than abduction brace immobilisation.

CONCLUSION

For many respondents to this survey, rehabilitation for the three case scenarios was similar and has not evolved in line with contemporary research evidence. The reasons behind this need to be explored and incorporated into the design of future research evaluating rehabilitation following rotator cuff repair.

Rehabilitation variability after rotator cuff repair

BACKGROUND

There has been increasing recognition of the importance for standardized postoperative rehabilitation protocols. Despite published guidelines in 2016 by the American Society of Shoulder and Elbow Therapists (ASSET), optimal postoperative rehabilitation after rotator cuff repair (RCR) remains an area of active academic debate. The goals of this study were (1) to assess the variability of RCR rehabilitation protocols published online, (2) to study the congruence between online RCR rehabilitation protocols and the ASSET consensus statement, and (3) to identify differences in online RCR rehabilitation protocols from before and after 2016.

METHODS

A web-based search was conducted for publicly available RCR rehabilitation protocols from websites of all Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) academic orthopedic institutions. A supplemental 10-page Google search was also performed with the search terms "rotator cuff repair rehabilitation protocol." Collected protocols were grouped by tear size (small/medium or large/massive) and examined for information relating to the following categories: protocol demographics, adjunctive therapy use, immobilization/range of motion, and strengthening. Findings were compared to the ASSET statement's recommendations. Protocols published before and after ASSET's 2016 publication were compared for differences.

RESULTS

A total of 66 online RCR rehabilitation protocols were collected. Only 16 of 187 (8.5%) ACGME institutions provided online RCR rehabilitation protocols. The collected protocols recommend more aggressive rehabilitation in comparison to ASSET, specifically regarding immobilization time, passive range of motion initiation, active assisted range of motion initiation, and strengthening initiation (P < .001). Protocols published after 2016 trended toward more conservative recommendations in comparison to protocols published before 2016. Regardless of this trend, the majority of these recommendations were still largely more aggressive than ASSET's recommendations.

CONCLUSION

Despite an attempt by ASSET to provide standardization, this study highlights the marked variations that still exist regarding RCR rehabilitation. Additionally, online RCR rehabilitation protocols tend to make more aggressive recommendations than the ASSET consensus statement. Further research is needed to address these variations and to either validate, alter, or reject the ASSET recommendations.

Effectiveness of early versus delayed rehabilitation following rotator cuff repair: Systematic review and meta-analyses

Objective

To investigate the effectiveness of early rehabilitation compared with delayed/standard rehabilitation after rotator cuff repair for pain, function, range of movement, strength, and repair integrity.

Design

Systematic review and meta-analyses.

Methods

We searched databases and included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing early with delayed/standard rehabilitation for patients undergoing rotator cuff repair surgery. We assessed risk of bias of the RCTs using the Cochrane RoB 2 tool.

Results

Twenty RCTs, with 1841 patients, were included. The majority of the RCTs were of high or unclear risk of overall bias. We found substantial variations in the rehabilitation programmes, time in the sling and timing of exercise progression. We found no statistically significant differences for pain and function at any follow-up except for the outcome measure Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation at six months (MD: 6.54; 95%CI: 2.24–10.84) in favour of early rehabilitation. We found statistically significant differences in favour of early rehabilitation for shoulder flexion at six weeks (MD: 7.36; 95%CI: 2.66–12.06), three (MD: 8.45; 95%CI: 3.43–13.47) and six months (MD: 3.57; 95%CI: 0.81–6.32) and one year (MD: 1.42; 95%CI: 0.21–2.64) and similar differences for other planes of movement. In terms of repair integrity, early mobilisation does not seem to increase the risk of re-tears (OR:1.05; 95%CI: 0.64–1.75).

Discussion

Current approaches to early mobilisation, based largely on early introduction of passive movement, did not demonstrate significant differences in most clinical outcomes, although we found statistically significant differences in favour of early rehabilitation for range of movement. Importantly, there were no differences in repair integrity between early and delayed/standard rehabilitation. Most rehabilitation programmes did not consider early active movement as soon as the patient feels able. With ongoing variation in rehabilitation protocols there remains a need for large high quality RCT to inform the optimal approach to rehabilitation after rotator cuff repair surgery.

Post-surgery rehabilitation following rotator cuff repair. A survey of current (2020) Italian clinical practice

AIMS

To analyse the clinical practice of Italian physiotherapists within the framework of postoperative rehabilitation of rotator cuff (RC) surgery patients, and to compare it with similar studies carried out in other countries.

METHODS

A web-based, voluntary, cross-sectional survey with 27 closed multiple-choice questions was developed and submitted to Italian-based physiotherapists in order to assess their clinical practice.

RESULTS

Data from 1160 questionnaires were then analysed. Thirty-five percent of respondents (n = 413/1160) reported that they commence passive range of motion from the first postoperative week, while 49.2% (n = 571/1160) start during the second or third week. The majority of respondents (n = 603/1160, 52.0%) introduce active mobilisation between the fourth and the sixth week after surgery and 41.1% (n = 477/1160) introduce overhead movements between the fourth and the sixth week after surgery.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS

When managing the postoperative rehabilitation of RC surgery patients, Italian physiotherapists' practice is congruent with the guidelines published by American Society of Shoulder and Elbow Therapists (ASSET) and also with other UK surveys. However, while Italian physiotherapists manage immobilisation periods, active and passive mobilisation and the return to sport activities, according to evidence-based best practice guidelines, there is less consistency with respect to physical exercise, patient follow-up and referral.IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONItalian physiotherapists' practice with patients following rotator cuff (RC) repair complies with evidence-based practice guidelines regarding immobilisation periods, passive and active mobilisation, and return to sport activities.There is less consistency between reported/declared practice and available evidence concerning physical exercise, patient follow-up, and referral.Physiotherapist with Orthopaedic Manipulative Physical Therapy (OMPT) training is more aligned with the current literature compared to physiotherapists without specific training, in terms of managing rehabilitation programmes, period of immobilisation and therapeutic exercise.More careful adherence to the international guidelines is recommended, in order to manage patients following RC repair in accordance with the evidence and to achieve the best possible outcomes.

Rehabilitation following rotator cuff repair: A nested qualitative study exploring the perceptions and experiences of participants in a randomised controlled trial

OBJECTIVE

To investigate acceptability, barriers to adherence with the interventions, and which outcome measures best reflect the participants' rehabilitation goals in a pilot and feasibility randomised controlled trial evaluating early patient-directed rehabilitation and standard rehabilitation, including sling immobilisation for four weeks, following surgical repair of the rotator cuff of the shoulder.

DESIGN

Nested qualitative study.

SETTING

Five English National Health Service Hospitals.

SUBJECTS

Nineteen patient participants who had undergone surgical repair of the rotator cuff and 10 healthcare practitioners involved in the trial.

METHOD

Individual semi-structured interviews. Data were analysed thematically.

RESULTS

Four themes: (1) Preconceptions of early mobilisation; many participants were motivated to enter the trial for the opportunity of removing their sling and getting moving early. (2) Sling use and movement restrictions; for some, sling use for four weeks was unacceptable and contributed to their pain, rather than relieving it. (3) Tensions associated with early mobilisation; clinical tensions regarding early mobilisation and the perceived risk to the surgical repair were apparent. (4) Processes of running the trial; participants found the trial processes to be largely appropriate and acceptable, but withholding the results of the post-operative research ultrasound scan was contentious.

CONCLUSION

Trial processes were largely acceptable, except for withholding results of the ultrasound scan. For some participants, use of the shoulder sling for a prolonged period after surgery was a reported barrier to standard rehabilitation whereas the concept of early mobilisation contributed tension for some healthcare practitioners due to concern about the effect on the surgical repair.